Test from my RW6828 device before and after upgrade WM6 ROM.
- Jb2 = Java Benchmark 2
- VSB07 = VS Benchmark 2007
- spb = spb Benchmark
Interesting.
For the last two pics, results seems to be inverted, no ?
I've read that the CPU speed was increased on the WM6 ROM.
Can you check that ?
Otherwise the results have no real meaning.
Don't you agree ?
So I'd be interested to see the power consumption comparison.
Yes, the wm6 rom is for atom exec which the clock speed is 520. So the overall performance is better. But seemingly, the power consumption is higher.
noi_kog said:
Test from my RW6828 device before and after upgrade WM6 ROM.
- Jb2 = Java Benchmark 2
- VSB07 = VS Benchmark 2007
- spb = spb Benchmark
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you show me how to flash wm6 onto HP6828. very interested. thank you!
Related
Do you guys think WM6 speed is slower than WM5? or just my imagination?
I have tried AKU 2.2 , 2.3, 3.2 , then WM6 pdamobiz V2, WM6 PDAVIET 4.0.0.6 touch version, I found that both wm6 version respond time are slow, is it just these 2 build, or generally , WM6 is slower?
I have to downgrade to 2.2 jester R1 again.... still find that it's a best version at the moment....
I am using now PDAVIET 4.0.0.0.6 I find it ok for my needs. Indeed the fastest for me was ASERG 3.3.13 - amazingly fast rom. Before that I used the official version from o2 - it was an AKU 2.0 and was awful.
chavdar said:
I am using now PDAVIET 4.0.0.0.6 I find it ok for my needs. Indeed the fastest for me was ASERG 3.3.13 - amazingly fast rom. Before that I used the official version from o2 - it was an AKU 2.0 and was awful.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same with me for both;
PDAVIET 4.0.0.0.6 &
ASERG 3.3.13
still ASERG 3.3.13 is incredibly faster and stable,
PDAVIET 4.0.0.0.6 much faster in my s200 than wm5.. but battery deployment much higher...
fireburn said:
PDAVIET 4.0.0.0.6 much faster in my s200 than wm5.. but battery deployment much higher...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PDaviet 4.0.0.6 touch is the fastest Os ive tried although the program memmory is less since it is 8mb pagepool...........
it isn't really faster. wm6 has some improvements like faster loading of startmenu icons after a softreset or a faster windows directory access, but the rest of the speed is the same. opera doesn't render faster and coreplayer isn't able to use higher bitrates. and performance improvements which only can be recognized with benchmarking (for example sktools) aren't important. two or three point higher scores aren't subjective improvements.
wm6 is faster but it is only a little advantage over wm5.
Try Smart1 V3. It operates at lightspeed compared to official WM5 ROM. Specially when using Batterystatus. Mine is running constantly at 286Mhz without significant heating up.
oh, my official wm5 rom from o2 was SUCH A PAIN. they forced me to use these "illegal" unofficial roms. booting the device took 5 minutes and accessing the windows directory caused a 3 minutes long loading circle...
I'm a little bit confused
WM6 is so slow on my device and few bugs, but of course newer versions and functions in the core, sure it is better but slower
I'm using WM5 2.2 witch is old but fast and stable I try every newer version of pdaviet and Prophet Touch; as I have now adsl connection at my work but no time; in my tests they are the best but go back to wm5 2.2 always waiting the final wm6 version from microsoft and ROM makers here wish that it will be good
again wm6 is slower than wm5
Now that WM6 English AkU0.3 wad released, which ROM do you think is faster for you?
WM5 AKU 3.3.3
or
WM6 AKU 0.3.0..
For me testing of speed is not only depends on benchmarking. The best way to check it is to run heavy programs for each ROM and see how fast they response to the program. Like playing high resource demanding games like Azgard Defence ,Machine War ,Zio Golf Tiger woods etc..
In WM6 they run smoothly...thats it!! Which means for me, WM6 is faster..
WM6 is faster and able to handle heavy applications smoothly.. There is no jerk in between application.
generalriden said:
Now that WM6 English AkU0.3 wad released, which ROM do you think is faster for you?
WM5 AKU 3.3.3
or
WM6 AKU 0.3.0..
For me testing of speed is not only depends on benchmarking. The best way to check it is to run heavy programs for each ROM and see how fast they response to the program. Like playing high resource demanding games like Azgard Defence ,Machine War ,Zio Golf Tiger woods etc..
In WM6 they run smoothly...thats it!! Which means for me, WM6 is faster..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a litle bit slow on booting but faster on processing...
this is so fast and also quite stable . its worth of trying
go to www.filehippo.com, you can find a lot of application including Activesync 4.5
i tried to benchmark this ATOm w/ wm6 using sktools..
BENCHMARK i
184.11 Atom Pure WM6
while others..
172.56 HTC magician Wm2003Se px416mhz
196.64 XDA Trion WM5 samsung400mhz
216.15 HTC universal WM5 pxa270 520mhz
Benchmark defines
benchmark is the act of running a computer program, a set of programs, or other operations, in order to assess the relative performance of an object, normally by running a number of standard tests and trials against it. The term, benchmark, is also commonly used for specially-designed benchmarking programs themselves. Benchmarking is usually associated with assessing performance characteristics of computer hardware, for example, the floating point operation performance of a CPU, but there are circumstances when the technique is also applicable to software. Software benchmarks are, for example, run against compilers or database management systems.
Benchmarks provide a method of comparing the performance of various subsystems across different chip/system architectures. Benchmarking is helpful in understanding how the database manager responds under varying conditions. You can create scenarios that test deadlock handling, utility performance, different methods of loading data, transaction rate characteristics as more users are added, and even the effect on the application of using a new release of the product.
No fair comparing the Atom with those, riden <_<
It's already SLOWER than an O2 Mini by default >_>
Ultimate Chicken said:
No fair comparing the Atom with those, riden <_<
It's already SLOWER than an O2 Mini by default >_>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry this is the only info i got..if you can share other info ...thanks
Hi.. I just bought an MWg ATOM life... the picture is not exactly the same, but I suppose I can use the O2 XDA Atom files to upgrade right??
PDAVIET_WM61_ROM_OS19209_PP6M
thanks for the help
Absolutely no. Atom Life is a 624 Mhz processor powered-PDA; Atom is a 416 MHz device. Atom Life is 3g Radio equipped....... Atom is only a GPRS device.
Avoid to flash Atom ROMs on Atom Life.......... you 'll risk a general freeze and make the device unusable.
On this room you can find several Atom Life WM 6.1 ROMs. Use only them for flashing your PDA.
Actually I bought a MWG Atom Life and am successfully running PDAViet's rom so
sanjie78 said:
Actually I bought a MWG Atom Life and am successfully running PDAViet's rom so
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U meant Medkid's Atom Life ROM right? Atom rom should not run on ATOM life..
Sorry, yes i'm running the Atom Life rom. So far no issues
sanjie78 said:
Actually I bought a MWG Atom Life and am successfully running PDAViet's rom so
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I bought Mwg Atom Life about a week. It works perfect. no hanging no fast battery drain. no memory leakage . It works perfectly. What is the improvement in PV onofficial rom?(more efficient battery or more free ram?or improve speed!!) Is it worth a try?
If it is only threated sms and task manager it's not worth a dime for me. I also have a O2 xda atom and upgraded it to wm6.1 and familiar about thease two features.
THX
thanks.. you just saved me from a loaner bricked device!!
vocian said:
I bought Mwg Atom Life about a week. It works perfect. no hanging no fast battery drain. no memory leakage . It works perfectly. What is the improvement in PV onofficial rom?(more efficient battery or more free ram?or improve speed!!) Is it worth a try?
If it is only threated sms and task manager it's not worth a dime for me. I also have a O2 xda atom and upgraded it to wm6.1 and familiar about thease two features.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PV ROM has WM 6.1 (unofficial) and so has SMS Threader......... a great improvement for who uses strongly SMS services............. Threader collects SMS and queues them by sending number..... it order by date and time... it works great
dudu7559 said:
PV ROM has WM 6.1 (unofficial) and so has SMS Threader......... a great improvement for who uses strongly SMS services............. Threader collects SMS and queues them by sending number..... it order by date and time... it works great
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for your information.
I already knew what is threaded sms is. but for me it is worthless specially when there is dosens of freeware and software that do the same as threaded sms.
My main question is : If you have a mwg atom life whithout any problem is it worth the rist to update to a buggy unofficial rom or its just threaded sms and thats all?
no offence to the cooker but even best unofficial ROMs have big problems!!
Personnally I had freezing problems with the last WM6 official ROM from O2... Now I have upgraded to the last ROM version of Medkid and so far I'm perfectly happy, I don't have freeze problems anymore!
Also the Java midlets application is way better... I also like the HTC today screen, which you obviously don't have with the official ROM...
tnx for your answer.
while i have no proplem with freezing and don't need to run java midlets there is no diffrence between them? (speed? free ram)
htc home plugin can be downloaded(.cab file is everywhere)
Hello to all,
After almost 5 months, again a small contribution to our community, in a form of test od 6 different ROMs, 3x WM6 ROMs + 3x WM6.1 ROMs:
HTC_WWE_2.21.405.2
AP3 Dual by PK
WM6_TMUK_2.35.110.4
AP4 SPL 1.2 by Irus
Irus' SPL1.2 0 MB pp
MiChY's 2.14 light
3 new WM 6.1 ROMs are faster, and there is no itention to promote any of mentioned ROMs as the fastest one, or as the stablest one. Benchmarking is always a double-edged axe, so use the benchmark results only as - numbers
Testing conditions:
Device: T-Mobile Ameo
- clean ROM install, basic device configuration
- no miniSD, no SIM inserted
- SPB Benchmark(tm) DEVICE install (SPB Benchmark is a trade mark of Spb Software House)
- every ROM tested with 18 tests, 3 times x 15 minutes
Total time for installation, testing and table calculation: 6 h.
Regards,
MDA3__CRO
MDA3__CRO said:
- every ROM tested with 18 tests, 3 times x 15 minutes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Results seems to be very similar.
What is deviance among 3 performed tests?
(realy for statistics there need to be more than 3...)
MDA3__CRO said:
Hello to all,
After almost 5 months, again a small contribution to our community, in a form of test od 6 different ROMs, 3x WM6 ROMs + 3x WM6.1 ROMs:
HTC_WWE_2.21.405.2
AP3 Dual by PK
WM6_TMUK_2.35.110.4
AP4 SPL 1.2 by Irus
Irus' SPL1.2 0 MB pp
MiChY's 2.14 light
3 new WM 6.1 ROMs are faster, and there is no itention to promote any of mentioned ROMs as the fastest one, or as the stablest one. Benchmarking is always a double-edged axe, so use the benchmark results only as - numbers
Testing conditions:
Device: T-Mobile Ameo
- clean ROM install, basic device configuration
- no miniSD, no SIM inserted
- SPB Benchmark(tm) DEVICE install (SPB Benchmark is a trade mark of Spb Software House)
- every ROM tested with 18 tests, 3 times x 15 minutes
Total time for installation, testing and table calculation: 6 h.
Regards,
MDA3__CRO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AP4 by IRUS is Vanilla PP0 ????
vidmabal said:
Results seems to be very similar.
What is deviance among 3 performed tests?
(realy for statistics there need to be more than 3...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, results are very similar, because a half of SPB Benchmarks in Main Test is a hardware dependent.
Just for an exemplar, here is a link for a previous 3 ROM SPB Benchmarks, which contain data about all of 3 series of testing and average results:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=385810
Just because of results table size, this time I didn't include results for 3 series of testing, only average results.
If you are familiar with SPB Benchamrk, you will know that every single test is
performed 13 times as internal benchmark process. I made 3 series of 18
different tests (it took over 10 minutes per serie), every of it is repeated 13 times
as a way of how SPB Benchmark is performed. Just 1 (one) SPB Main Benchmark Test
is sufficient for a fair result, but I made 3, just for any case.
If you want a very big result table, please, let me know, and I will post it here.
Montecristo said:
AP4 by IRUS is Vanilla PP0 ????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it is AP4 VANILLA 4 SPL 1.2 by Irus, nbh file release date is 05/21/08
IMHO and very subjective, I tried it in a effort to find ROM without message flaw I found in the newest ROMs (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=2605629#post2605629). I found it a very slow in opening applications and useless for me. But on SPB Benchmarks this ROM is slightly faster (have better results) than others.
It will be great if some mortscript guru will define a test suite script for windows mobile devices... based on REAL LIFE usage!
EG. opening office test file, opening a website, starting opera, finding a string, tom tom starting, java speed....
Real life usage tests are the best to compare ROM, and may be this is the only realistic way. IF you compare, using SPB benchmarks, DIAMOND overall with BLUEANGEL.... Diamond is rubbish!
sergiopi said:
It will be great if some mortscript guru will define a test suite script for windows mobile devices... based on REAL LIFE usage!
EG. opening office test file, opening a website, starting opera, finding a string, tom tom starting, java speed....
Real life usage tests are the best to compare ROM, and may be this is the only realistic way. IF you compare, using SPB benchmarks, DIAMOND overall with BLUEANGEL.... Diamond is rubbish!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you. SPB Benchmark Main test has a section "Built-in applications",
and it can also test the following:
- Pocket Word document open
- Pocket Internet Explorer HTML load
- Pocket Internet Explorer JPEG load
- File Explorer large folder list
The only problem which may appear is when tested ROM do not contain required component, for exemplar - Pocket Word.
It will take a lot of time (flashing, testing, flashing, result table building etc), but I will try to find time to test a few SPL 1.2 ROMs with mentioned method.
Hi.
Here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=764268 ,
are my two cents' worth about bad behaviour of battery indicator.
Is it possible to change existing battdrv.dll driver to other version ( if exists of course ) without new ROM cooking ? Previously I utilized Novembre5 ROM, now ffboy WM 6.1 ROM.
In system registry driver description concerning battery driver, one can change "dll" value to any other than battdrv.dll but I guess so that new driver worked ok, it must be non XIP'ed.
Have You any idea ?
Regards
fxdjacentyfxd
fxdjacentyfxd said:
Hi.
Here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=764268 ,
are my two cents' worth about bad behaviour of battery indicator.
Is it possible to change existing battdrv.dll driver to other version ( if exists of course ) without new ROM cooking ? Previously I utilized Novembre5 ROM, now ffboy WM 6.1 ROM.
In system registry driver description concerning battery driver, one can change "dll" value to any other than battdrv.dll but I guess so that new driver worked ok, it must be non XIP'ed.
Have You any idea ?
Regards
fxdjacentyfxd
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have compare in my ROMs 6.1 , 6.5, 6.5.3 and 6.5.5 all has the same driver with 21 kB. And you can a driver from ROM not change wihout cooking.
The difference make the OS Version. All has as basis kernel 5.2. the best adaption is for 6.1 then 6.5.3 and 6.5.5 and then for 6.5. with wm 6.1 you have the best performance and battery time - BUT this is not all. important thing is also the UI. SPB Mobile Shell unload the battery very fast. HTC SENSE is little better. the best is "old6.1Style" or Titanium- bat wath helps if is not user friendly.
fact is for a powerCPU is the capacity with 1100 mAh to low. new devices has 1300 - 1500 mAh.
p.s.
the right place for your thried is:
TG01 General Discussion about the Toshiba TG01 (general Q&A, tips & tricks)
mirolg said:
i have compare in my ROMs 6.1 , 6.5, 6.5.3 and 6.5.5 all has the same driver with 21 kB. And you can a driver from ROM not change wihout cooking.
The difference make the OS Version. All has as basis kernel 5.2. the best adaption is for 6.1 then 6.5.3 and 6.5.5 and then for 6.5. with wm 6.1 you have the best performance and battery time - BUT this is not all. important thing is also the UI. SPB Mobile Shell unload the battery very fast. HTC SENSE is little better. the best is "old6.1Style" or Titanium- bat wath helps if is not user friendly.
fact is for a powerCPU is the capacity with 1100 mAh to low. new devices has 1300 - 1500 mAh.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mirlog, I do not consider what eats energy more or less. I say about bad battery driver behaviour ( can not see other guilty ) so it is strange nobody reports the same I noticed taking into account battery driver is the same for all WM versions as You mentioned.
It seems driver remeber only difference in voltage ( and in one direction - lowest level ) not current level.
Regards
fxdjacentyfxd
fxdjacentyfxd said:
mirlog, I do not consider what eats energy more or less. I say about bad battery driver behaviour ( can not see other guilty ) so it is strange nobody reports the same I noticed taking into account battery driver is the same for all WM versions as You mentioned.
It seems driver remeber only difference in voltage ( and in one direction - lowest level ) not current level.
Regards
fxdjacentyfxd
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I second miro's reply.
I have noticed it's more or less likely the UI which will affect the battery behaviour. Don't know how the driver will change anything as 6.1 > 6.5 in terms of battery saving, but again has same driver! So same driver behaves differently - meaning it's the rom that changes cpu usage which in turn changes battery behaviour.
What I have noticed is 'clean rom' (6.1 or 6.5.x) + titanium or basic WinMo UI = the best battery usage - I have had days when with plenty of calls and texts, I don't charge my tg01 till next morning or even late afternoon!
when I use 'cooked rom' + spb/sense = the battery usage is terrible. By end of one evening, I am there sitting and charging my tg01!