I would killer the faster of three two if there is any difference please thank you
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Voodoo would be the better fix since it uses ext 4. OCLF uses ext 2 which in the long run could cause data corruption. I use oclf because I've got the larger nand and voodoo will only install on phones with the smaller one.
Bionix 1.9.1 w/JACs UV/0C v1.1
Pretty much as stated above. However in the interest of quelling yet another "I'm dense and borked my phone because I used Voodoo without understanding it fully" thread please be sure that you FULLY UNDERSTAND the responsibility you have as a user of Voodoo that you read carefully and always, always, always disable it before flashing anything.
Other than that, go for the Voodoo, if you want a workable lagfix with little input from the user, go with OCLF.
Personally I had horrible experiences with OCLF on my phone and the girlfriend. When removing OCLF, it doesn't sometime remove correctly. Which left me in a huge pile of infinite force closes in a loop. Voodoo is the right way to go if you have the smaller NAND chip.
They are both about equal. In my experience, ext2 is slightly faster than ext4, but it's barely noticeable. Anyway, if the z4 mod ever gets easier to use, that will definitely be the fix to use (and it lets you decide between ext2, 3 or 4)
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Oclf is a bit faster since it doesn't maintain a journal table. On the other hand, because of the journal filesystem on ext3 and ext4 your data is safer from corruption. Both tend to improve overall feel accessing the data, so it is personal preference.
Sent from my bionix powered Vibrant
Related
I am still trying to learn more about Voodoo Lag Fix before I download the Obsidian V3 w/ Voodoo Lag Fix (Team Whiskey).
I can't seem to find the thread about it explaining in greater detail what it is different between this fix over the other one (OCLF)
Yes, I know they are two different lag fixes, but would like to know more about the Voodoo Lag Fix in greater detail.
- I know that OCLF uses ext 2 and Voodoo uses ext 4
- I know that IT IS A MUST to disable Voodoo BEFORE flashing other ROM's
- I learned that in some people's opinion Voodoo is better than OCLF, vice versa
(These are the basic things that I know so far.)
Guess what I am trying to ask is what are the pros and cons of the Voodoo Lag Fix. (Everything explained in greater detail would be great.. just can't seem to find the thread or sticky on this topic.) Sorry if it seems that I haven't searched hard enough; I'm just sick of reading about which is better than the other ones.
Bump... are there none?
OCLF creates like a buffer between the normal filesystem and the OS. So the phone still uses RFS (the crappy Samsung filesystem), but through the buffer of ext2.
Voodoo actually converts the filesystem from RFS to ext4, and does not have a buffer of any kind.
OCLF may get better Quadrant scores, but Voodoo (or even better, z4mod) are much better for real-world usage.
so how would I go about disabling it if I ever have to reflash the phone? also, would the voodoo lagfix be better for battery life or no?
I don't really think either one affects battery life much. I get great battery life with on my phone that has Voodoo.
And to disable Voodoo, you just put a file called Disable Lagfix on in the Voodoo folder on your phone and reboot. Rebooting when enabling or disabling Voodoo can take a while, since it has to convert the filesystem back and forth.
Try browsing around the Project Voodoo site for more info.
alright I will take a look at the read! Thanks for the help!!
moved to main forum
I have oclf ext2, black glass swype, and the circular segmented battery. I am wondering if this will brick my phone since I want to flash Axura asap. I wouldn't be so hesitant to find out for my self if I had a computer and odin at the moment.
Sent from beyond galaxy s
Yes, you need to disable the lagfix.
Simple enough since its ext2. So I'm guessing removing bloatware shouldn't natter either or replacing the youtube app. Thanks
Sent from beyond galaxy s
Didn't see this posted here, thought I would share it. This lag fix supposedly has excellent performance and comes in APK form, so you can install it. It is compatible with Fascinate. I have yet to test it and see how performance compares over doing just a Voodoo kernel with ext4 partitions.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=784691
I have used it previous to flashing a voodoo kernel and I honestly think it just inflates quadrant scores. I notice no drop in performance on voodoo. It is however a viable option for those wanting to keep a stock kernel. The apk wrapper makes it a little more user friendly I suppose
Edit: if I recall correctly it uses Ext2 partitioning
Samsung Fascinate
Frankenclean 2.7 Voodoo
mob87's EB01 Honeycomb Theme
Sent from XDA Premium App
navenedrob said:
Didn't see this posted here, thought I would share it. This lag fix supposedly has excellent performance and comes in APK form, so you can install it. It is compatible with Fascinate. I have yet to test it and see how performance compares over doing just a Voodoo kernel with ext4 partitions.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=784691
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its been pretty well documented that this is a placebo lagfix that just inflates quadrant scores...very very little performance gains over rfs in real life usage
Outdated, and redundant. No need for this thread. A search would have turned this up.
I can personally vouch for the fact that it was not a placebo effect for me. Crazy Quadrant scores aside, I did notice an improvement in performance with it in some areas, and it was definitely a much safer fix than the older forms of Voodoo. However, once the reliable Voodoo 5 came out, this old ext2 lag fix was basically sent to the graveyard. It used a virtual ext2 partition on top of RFS, whereas the Voodoo fix directly converts RFS to ext4, resulting in far better performance all around.
Posted from my EB01 SuperClean Fascinate with Voodoo
navenedrob said:
I have yet to test it and see how performance compares over doing just a Voodoo kernel with ext4 partitions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
STRONGLY recommend you don't try applying this over Voodoo, since it will try to apply ext2 over RFS and you won't have RFS...
essentially...dont use this...if you want, use voodoo, but not this
I think you guys read into this way too much.
This fix is better than a stock RFS FS. So if you are running stock then this will perform better than a stock rom running RFS.
If you are running a Voodoo fix, then this will perform comparably to that, but you shouldn't use both at the same time, as that would not make any sense. Honestly, I feel like it runs better. It isn't a "placebo" effect, as it just creates an ext2 container to run files from, and is essentially the same thing as creating a partition with ext4 and running files directly from it, without the added functions of the ext4 fs.
I would recommend making some changes to minfree and the task scheduler, however, as that would improve performance and these are functions included in the APK.
navenedrob said:
I think you guys read into this way too much.
This fix is better than a stock RFS FS. So if you are running stock then this will perform better than a stock rom running RFS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most people that use it say that it only "works" for a day or two, then things start slowing down again. It is also placebo as you have to write to a virtual partition, which then writes to the actual file system, so you're doing two writes rather than one. It's also been seen that it's very buggy and can be problematic to remove as well. You'd be better off installing a voodoo kernel if you want faster I/O, otherwise, you should just stick with RFS.
So I'm sure the title makes this clear already, but I have an HTC Incredible as of now, but am preparing to trade for a Fascinate. From what I've gathered online, the Fascinate has the Incredible beat on hardware (except for the camera), but isn't quite up to par on software (TW vs Sense, Bing, just got Froyo, etc), but for a CM/AOSP guy, that's not too big of a problem.
So, I just have a few questions as I prepare to make the transition.
With the DInc, pretty much everything can be done on the phone after the one-click root with unrEVOked. It's to my understanding that much of what has to be done is in Odin? The concept of going through another technological medium to accomplish something on my phone is going to be a bit new for me, but I catch on really quickly, so I'm not too worried.
Are there any tricks or tips/helpful reading material that anyone could suggest as I settle in over here?
As I looked through the Dev section (however briefly), it seemed like Kaoscinator was the most stable GB rom available on the Fascinate. If this is not true, which is? I'm not a fan of MIUI, and tend to like stock GB (or as close as possible) the best, so this would really be my biggest question.
Thanks!
The stickies in the General section should get you off to a running start. As for CM/Aosp builds, JT's CM7, currently test build 5, is the most stable and functional at this time.
i would suggest ComRom, most AOSP like in that it doesn't have TW, but everything works, give CM a alittle time, it will be perfect when 100% working...but also know that OMFGB and OMGB will be ported soon, r2doesinc is on the case, and they are working on that atm...
I ended up going through ComRom to get to the CM7 alpha/beta/whatever it's being called. It's pretty stable, I was pleased with it. I needed me some real AOSP though (modded AOSP, but you get the point). The only issue I've had so far was the random ringing, but that disappeared after someone called me before I had the chance to reboot. Haven't had it since.
I was having problems using RM to flash a recovery, but that's because there was a step that I was skipping... Odin. If my bootloader had security disabled, S-Off, I could completely unroot, and go from pure stock to a rooted Rom in the time it takes to make a Nandroid, wipe, flash and boot. Being able to flash a recovery image through the bootloader on the phone is really the only thing I miss from the Incredible other than tthe optical trackpad. I'm loving the screen size, and everything else. The processor on this phone is fantastic. I can't wait to see what springs up in the development forum once the CM team officially supports this device. Especially some OC kernels... this thing could go even faster, I can feel it.
OMFGB will be a welcome addition as well. R2 and his team do great work!
I'm still learning things and establishing procedure, but if anyone could point me to some plain as day information on what exactly Voodoo is, that'd be great. That's not something I've ever heard of until now.
Thanks for the patience! I catch on quick, I promise I don't ask a whole lot of questions, as I try to figure it out on my own first, the switch is just a little daunting with the addition of Odin. Weird stuff.
Voodoo is comprised of a few parts.
Voodoo lagfix-- converts the file system from RFS to the speedier ext4. This improves the responsiveness of the phone
Voodoo Color-- makes the colors of the phone "pop" more and look better.
Voodoo sound-- The galaxy S series of phones have a VERY good audio chip. Voodoo sound lets you fully take advantage of the processor's power. Hook this phone up to a decent receiver and speaks and you will be pleasantly surprised.
Voodoo sound and color REQUIRE kernel source code to be baked in. Voodoo lagfix does not require kernel source. Thus, you can have voodoo lagfix without color/sound (and potentially vice-versa).
Aha! The Fascinate's partitions ARE Ext4 (except for non-Voodoo, of course)! I thought so! The partitions were all Ext3 on the DInc. That's pretty cool!
Now, how would one control Voodoo? Is there an app that does that, or is this controlled via the Voodoo Settings in the Lag-Fix Recovery?
Sound is controlled with voodoo control app in the market. Lagfix is controlled by clockwork. Color is just built into the kernel and has no setting options
Voodoo color only works when you have your backlight set to max brightness... unless I am mistaken
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
You are correct...its to help balance the colors to remove the blue tint of bright white display due to its pentile design
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
RegnierD said:
Especially some OC kernels... this thing could go even faster, I can feel it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We've had OC kernels for a long time, including for CM7: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1119169
Falcyn said:
We've had OC kernels for a long time, including for CM7: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1119169
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, I just found that exact kernel. I stumble into something new every time I go through the Dev forum. I'm definitely digging this phone.
I like the custom kernels but the voodoo conversion seems to do more harm than good sometimes, are there any cons to just not converting it?
Currently the difference is more placebo than real gain. My suggestion is to clear cache/dalvik and try out stock kernel for a few days, then try a voodoo kernel and compare them day 1/1 day 2/2 etc. I decided to stick with the stock kernel since it was working fine for me and it didn't mess up my screen with that voodoo color crap.
Are you referring to the voodoo lagfix?
No, there's no cons to not using it. I find my phone actually works better with it off.
The only con is that your phone is gonna run slower than it would if it had voodoo on it, also your gonna have a lower quadrant score, but that doesnt really mean anythinng. i dont recommend voodoo lagfix, but i do recommend voodoo sound
Aye, I've been running without the lagfix enabled for a while and I don't really regret it. Much less hassle for a flash-aholic.
sendan said:
Aye, I've been running without the lagfix enabled for a while and I don't really regret it. Much less hassle for a flash-aholic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had better results with lagfix disabled on tks kernal aswell. I really dont think ext4 is any faster than rfs on gb... now on froyo roms I noticed more of a difference...couldnt tell you why.