Related
Ok so I've been reading these forums and time after time I see posts about the evo 3d being slow and the gs2 just being a beast..am I missing something bc last I checked the 3d hasn't been released yet and the only review I saw was on wirefly the 3d looked very impressive to me. No indication of lag or slow down? I still believe in HTC..I don't think they would release a ****ty or out classed phone..not saying the gs2 isn't sick but I just don't see what makes it so much better..I've seen a lot of quality/screen issues on their forums..
i think the lag they are seeing is based on the governors operation of the a sync cores but there is no doubt that the gs2 is faster
I just don't know how that can be said without the phone being released yet..no one has used it..I think it solely based on the benchmarks which are inaccurate based in the a sync cores..even a gs2 fan can't deny that..
firmbiz94 said:
I just don't know how that can be said without the phone being released yet..no one has used it..I think it solely based on the benchmarks which are inaccurate based in the a sync cores..even a gs2 fan can't deny that..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+10000 10chrs
People are basing it on the sensation reviews because they think its the same phone when its not wirefly said it was super fast and smooth so we will see
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
I sure hope the EVO-3D is on par with the Galaxy S 2 smoothness and lag free, because the Sensation reviews sure make it seem choppy, and just an average phone, nothing spectacular.
Sent from my EVO 4G "Myn's RS 5"
Specs are similar. If it is laggy it may be software related. But I don't for see any issues.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App
cspen said:
Specs are similar. If it is laggy it may be software related. But I don't for see any issues.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct with those specs. It should fly..I think the devs will make it ridiculous with a slick custom Rom and a oc kernel
Root+titanium backup-bloatware= happy times
sent from anything but an iPhone
I think GS2 is out in Europe already. Saw a video of it on Phonedog youtube channel.
For some reason people are thinking that this phone is the same as the Sensation even though they are 2 different phones.What they are thinking is: So since the sensation has lag the evo 3d must have lag too. When in reality nobody will know until more reviews hit.
I'm pretty sure any of us prior Evo4G owners are going to be quite happy with the performance of the new Qualcomm dual in here, increase in RAM, Adreno 220 GPU (YES!) and higher screen res. I can't wait for this phone. I love Samsung displays, but I really am not a fan of their handsets for some reason.
bigant262 said:
I think GS2 is out in Europe already. Saw a video of it on Phonedog youtube channel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's been out for weeks
aaronpoweruser said:
i think the lag they are seeing is based on the governors operation of the a sync cores but there is no doubt that the gs2 is faster
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What lag? I've watched every video i can and I've never seen lag. no doubt the gs2 is faster? Evo 3D isn't even out yet, not sure you can make a claim like that. (but i think the E3D will beat the gs2 in the end)
sprinttouch666 said:
What lag? I've watched every video i can and I've never seen lag. no doubt the gs2 is faster? Evo 3D isn't even out yet, not sure you can make a claim like that. (but i think the E3D will beat the gs2 in the end)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just because the phone isn't out does not mean nobody has EVER used it.
If you do some research you will see people that have used BOTH phones and side by side the GS2 is SIGNIFICANTLY faster in all of the benchmark apps out there. I know that does not mean much, and it is not to say that the EVO 3D will be slow or laggy, but the GS2 *IS* going to be faster stock.
I believe once the EVO 3D gets rooted and we are able to overclock and remove the bloatware it definitely has the potential to outperform the GS2 assuming that the Samsung doesn't get as much development support as HTC phones get. I am getting the EVO 3D, but I am not expecting it to perform like a GS2.
No video says the sgs 2 is faster then the evo 3d there only against the sensation which is not the same phone
fmedina2 said:
Just because the phone isn't out does not mean nobody has EVER used it.
If you do some research you will see people that have used BOTH phones and side by side the GS2 is SIGNIFICANTLY faster in all of the benchmark apps out there. I know that does not mean much, and it is not to say that the EVO 3D will be slow or laggy, but the GS2 *IS* going to be faster stock.
I believe once the EVO 3D gets rooted and we are able to overclock and remove the bloatware it definitely has the potential to outperform the GS2 assuming that the Samsung doesn't get as much development support as HTC phones get. I am getting the EVO 3D, but I am not expecting it to perform like a GS2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
One word: sense
Two words: new sense
Two more words: is bloated
That is all
Sent from my PC36100
ttieder said:
No video says the sgs 2 is faster then the evo 3d there only against the sensation which is not the same phone
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only difference between the Sensation and the EVO 3D that will affect performance is 768 RAM vs 1 GB.
I asked bob at wirefly if there was any lag at all he said no and said its faster then the sensation
fmedina2 said:
The only difference between the Sensation and the EVO 3D that will affect performance is 768 RAM vs 1 GB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
fmedina2 said:
The only difference between the Sensation and the EVO 3D that will affect performance is 768 RAM vs 1 GB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is not true..they use different displays..both qhd yes but different panels..they also have different cameras..and of course the RAM ,those benchmarks.don't mean **** ..I know that people love to brag about there high bull**** quadrant scores but it is useless..honestly I thought the sensation held up very well against the gs2 ..the reviews online were so ridiculously biased I couldn't watch them. The first thing they do is "oh I'm.gonna run some benchmarks here" in Their British accent..in one comparison he was comparing messaging apps and the two apps were basically identical besides one be black background (gs2) and the sensation white..and he was like the gs2 clearly wins here again. Anyways side by side i did not see the epic difference in speed between the two..they seemed to be very similiar running through tasks IMHO..both very fast and smooth..and people act like 3d is no big deal but I think its pretty cool..its easy to call it a gag when your phone can't do it..and its an option u don't need to use it..but I'm sure it will "wow" the friends at work
That live wallpaper test honestly made me cringe a little. I am willing to bet though that most live wallpapers I use like microbes will work flawless, so that's all that matters. I'm not very worried about quadrant benchmarks either, at least not right now with the latest update and all seeming to be a little buggy.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using Tapatalk
HarmonyFlame said:
That live wallpaper test honestly made me cringe a little. I am willing to bet though that most live wallpapers I use like microbes will work flawless, so that's all that matters. I'm not very worried about quadrant benchmarks either, at least not right now with the latest update and all seeming to be a little buggy.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As a International GNote owner I was impressed. I have never tried a live wallpaper so do not know if the International would fare better, I doubt it. The screen transitions on static wallpaper looked impressive. Would have thought the Quadrant would be higher and the Antutu was right there with the International at 6400+
Overall it looks as though the ATT model has optimized touch wiz well. Initially, the International Note was laggy until a few updates were able to optimize and speed it up significantly.
Overall I think it looks great!
planoman said:
As a International GNote owner I was impressed. I have never tried a live wallpaper so do not know if the International would fare better, I doubt it. The screen transitions on static wallpaper looked impressive. Would have thought the Quadrant would be higher and the Antutu was right there with the International at 6400+
Overall it looks as though the ATT model has optimized touch wiz well. Initially, the International Note was laggy until a few updates were able to optimize and speed it up significantly.
Overall I think it looks great!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your honesty instead of bashing the device,enjoy your note because i know i'll enjoy mines
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium
That was rather.....meh. But I have no doubt the geniuses at xda will get this thing humming in no time.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
jpeg42 said:
That was rather.....meh. But I have no doubt the geniuses at xda will get this thing humming in no time.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I went from a 900 quadrant score on my SGS4G to a 3.5k so yeah I am sure it will be souped up in no time.
When he opened the app drawer, ATT crapware.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
ICS
I wonder how much better the Note will get with ICS?
Weird, this benchmarks considerably lower than the international version.
http://pocketnow.com/android/samsung-galaxy-note-review
A little disappointing if this is what att version does.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
http://www.gottabemobile.com/2012/02/14/samsung-galaxy-note-initial-speed-and-battery-tests/
The other issue is battery life. Yesterday I used the Galaxy Note heavily since it was my first day and I wanted to try everything. The result is that the battery was down to 4% after about 6 hours.
Not too surprising when overusing your phone the first day though.
mron0903 said:
Weird, this benchmarks considerably lower than the international version.
http://pocketnow.com/android/samsung-galaxy-note-review
A little disappointing if this is what att version does.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not weird at all. Qualcomm chip just can't compete with Exynose in these benchmarks. It's a well known fact.
jpeg42 said:
http://www.gottabemobile.com/2012/02/14/samsung-galaxy-note-initial-speed-and-battery-tests/
The other issue is battery life. Yesterday I used the Galaxy Note heavily since it was my first day and I wanted to try everything. The result is that the battery was down to 4% after about 6 hours.
Not too surprising when overusing your phone the first day though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
jpeg42,
Did you write the article? Nice job. The battery is something I am looking at closely before getting the ATT version. I have found 25-30% brightness more than adequate on my GNote and as you say it takes several cycles to see the full capacity on the battery. The other area I am interested in is Bluetooth. The International GNote has a BT that is superb! My skyrocket BT sucks and I am hoping it is not because of LTE. The LTE network in Dallas and Texas is top notch which is why I am considering the ATT model. Any insights will be appreciated.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA App
foxbat121 said:
It is not weird at all. Qualcomm chip just can't compete with Exynose in these benchmarks. It's a well known fact.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but I wasn't expecting such a huge difference considering that the att note is still a 1.5ghz phone. It's a little disappointing because my atrix benchmarks are around the same at a 1ghz clock speed.
I know rom development is going to be big with the note which is one of the reasons I'll be getting one, along with lte.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Benchmark and real world experience are two different thing. Qualcomm chip is 1-gen older than Exynos.
The new quadrant benchmark that he was using has lower scores in general., I just retested my Dell Streak using the new quadrant and the scores were about 500 points lower. The international note should be re-benchmarked with this new quadrant for perspective. If you notice the other benchmark scores arent really that off par.
Interestingly, Phone Dog just did an update on his 30 day challenge with the Note and just switched to the AT&T version. He's saying that in actual use, he feels like the Snapdragon has been faster than the Exynos. Granted, it's only been a day of use, but still interesting to hear from someone who's been using the International version for a few days and picks up the AT&T version.
http://www.phonedog.com/videos/samsung-galaxy-note-challenge-day-11/
Once we can freeze the bloatware, I'm sure its gonna fly! Even the international version would suffer with all of that installed...
Sent from my Dell Streak using Tapatalk
New Quadrant score for stock Intl. GNote
ucanthang29 said:
The new quadrant benchmark that he was using has lower scores in general., I just retested my Dell Streak using the new quadrant and the scores were about 500 points lower. The international note should be re-benchmarked with this new quadrant for perspective. If you notice the other benchmark scores arent really that off par.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is my stock Intl GNote on the new quadrant. Was a 4105 now 3753. As many are saying there are objective and subjective benchmarks. The app benchmarks are objective and the personal experience (Flipping the screens etc.) is subjective (Aaron on phone dog). Not sure what the ATT quadrant is, but in the subjective observations I have had on the videos, it looks fine and even snappy. Lisa on mobile tech review says they are comparable and that is good enough for me! lol! The Intl. GNote was not that snappy on screen transitions for a couple of updates but is pretty speedy now! The phones are comparable on the things I will use a phone for and for 90+% of us either model will be fine in performance in my opinion.
I know I'm in the gs2 forum but if anyone here has owned a nexus which do u think is better? It looks like our phone destroys the nexus but I wanted to see what others thought. Be gentle lol.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Skyler2Dope said:
I know I'm in the gs2 forum but if anyone here has owned a nexus which do u think is better? It looks like our phone destroys the nexus but I wanted to see what others thought. Be gentle lol.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
theres a million post just like this both phones are awesome if you wanna go for spec for spec i would say i777 is better only by a tiny bit not much better but if you wanna go software to software the Nexus is going to be better and also have more support for roms and development
Adam Outler in another thread mentioned Nexus S is actually a quad core, two for remedial tasks and two for hardcore processing like games. Sounds like the winner to me.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
AntwanL said:
Adam Outler in another thread mentioned Nexus S is actually a quad core, two for remedial tasks and two for hardcore processing like games. Sounds like the winner to me.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Gnex is a dual-core for its CPU. The "quad core" mess is if you include the DSPs, which only those a**holes hawking chinese tablets claim. Anyone repectable will call it a dual-core.
Heck, by that math my Prime is an Octo-core.
Simply put, the Gnex is about the same CPU-wise as the SGS2, but the SGS2's GPU dominates the Gnex. In trade, the Gnex has a technically better screen, but I wouldn't trade because I HATE Pentile screens. Also the Gnex lacks a SD card slot.
SGS II: Better CPU, GPU, camera
Galaxy Nexus: Better software, better screen, updates straight from google
i'm thinking of getting the Galaxy s3 but i'm having a bit of trouble deciding which one. before i continue i would like to sate a couple factor :
I have att, 3gb of data
I live in New York so i have LTE coverage everywhere
i barely use data for anything other than downloading an app, browsing the web, or watching something on youtube
i'm a major gamer so thats were getting the international one with its Exynos chip v.s the us one with snapdragon s4
So a couple of questions i wanted to ask you guys was:
Does 1gb vs 2gb of ram really make a difference and improve speed, i don't multitask a lot just like 2 or 3 apps
how good is the snapdragons 4 actually?( Give your opinion, and if you ever had lag when you used it)
How good is the snapdragon s4 for gaming, ex. GTA3, Max Payne, Modern Combat 3: Fallen Nation, N.O.V.A 3, and if the games ever felt laggy or a little glitchy?
Also they are more developers for the international version
thanks in advance
If you are not worried too much about the LTE speeds than your best bet is i9300. Exynos 4 Quad is definitely better for gaming ... I have the AT&T variant just because I wanted to have unlimited 4G plan (grandfathered unlimited 3G upgraded to unlimited 4G now).
Also, if u have ORD then i9300 is the best choice hands down. I can speak from my own experience when I chose to get i9100 over local US variants. The amount of developer support for the international models is mind boggling. You don't get that much support (as quickly) for the US variants.
So better gaming, better developer support. I would say go for i9300 ... Hope this helps.
enaybee said:
If you are not worried too much about the LTE speeds than your best bet is i9300. Exynos 4 Quad is definitely better for gaming ... I have the AT&T variant just because I wanted to have unlimited 4G plan (grandfathered unlimited 3G upgraded to unlimited 4G now).
Also, if u have ORD then i9300 is the best choice hands down. I can speak from my own experience when I chose to get i9100 over local US variants. The amount of developer support for the international models is mind boggling. You don't get that much support (as quickly) for the US variants.
So better gaming, better developer support. I would say go for i9300 ... Hope this helps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i really want to get the international version, i do, its just that $600 is out of my budget
Can anyone tell me if they ever experienced lag while play a high graphic intensive 3d game on any of the us/canadian Samsung galaxy s3?????
Please I have been trying to find out the answer for sooooo long, I'm begging you. Can some one please give me an honest and true answer
Sent from my LG-E739 using XDA Premium App
Get the international, trust me its worth the $600.
Nickel Dime Bay said:
Get the international, trust me its worth the $600.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's soooooooooooooooo good about the international one that makes it worth the $600. Is the difference in speed and performance really better on the international one?
Sent from my LG-E739 using XDA Premium App
I have the US version and I game quite a bit. I frequently play Max Payne, Shadow gun, Dead trigger and GTA3. I don't experience any lag what so ever. I couldn't make this thing lag if I wanted to. The 2Gs of RAM makes a world of difference IMO.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
yotorogo said:
What's soooooooooooooooo good about the international one that makes it worth the $600. Is the difference in speed and performance really better on the international one?
Sent from my LG-E739 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For ME the development alone is the biggest reason why i went for the international, we have so many recognized devs working on so many ROM's and its nice to get the first updates as soon as they come. The quad core is a bonus, as i have never seen a hint of lag or stutter on this thing. The 2gb of ram vs 1gb of ram isnt really that big of a deal to me, phones run perfectly fine on 1gb but 2gb is awesome too. This is why i chose the I9300, its different for everybody but i love this beast.
I come to these forums a lot to see what the US version has cooking and so far it looks like things are getting ready to pick up! Task and Ktoonz (sp?) are awesome devs.
If the $600 is out of your budget, then the convo is done. I mean what else do you need people to say?
Please don't take me being blunt, for rudeness.
Sent from my Aokp Galaxy s3!
TheJanitor07 said:
I have the US version and I game quite a bit. I frequently play Max Payne, Shadow gun, Dead trigger and GTA3. I don't experience any lag what so ever. I couldn't make this thing lag if I wanted to. The 2Gs of RAM makes a world of difference IMO.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THANK YOU, I have been trying to see if the us version had lag, that was my main concern, looks like I'll be getting the us versoin, or get it and sell it, then from the money I make I could get the international versoin. Thanks to everyone that helped me make my decision
Sent from my LG-E739 using XDA Premium App
yotorogo said:
THANK YOU, I have been trying to see if the us version had lag, that was my main concern, looks like I'll be getting the us versoin, or get it and sell it, then from the money I make I could get the international versoin. Thanks to everyone that helped me make my decision
Sent from my LG-E739 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem. Trust me, your going to love it. You probably won't even want to sell it for the international version. The US version handles everything just fine. In fact, tests have shown where the S4 processor actually performed faster in some situations. Most phones can't even utilize 4 threads yet. Put simply, you get all the performance of the quad-core (and then some), plus amazing battery life. We've seen video proof of the performance. With the S4 Qualcomm has introduced a new architecture, and it's cutting edge. It's based on the same instruction set as the new ARM A15 processors, which gives it a significant advantage over it's competitors. It will do tasks faster, and more efficiently than the rest of the current generation hardware. So performance is just as good overall and battery life should be better.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
TheJanitor07 said:
No problem. Trust me, your going to love it. You probably won't even want to sell it for the international version. The US version handles everything just fine. In fact, tests have shown where the S4 processor actually performed faster in some situations. Most phones can't even utilize 4 threads yet. Put simply, you get all the performance of the quad-core (and then some), plus amazing battery life. We've seen video proof of the performance. With the S4 Qualcomm has introduced a new architecture, and it's cutting edge. It's based on the same instruction set as the new ARM A15 processors, which gives it a significant advantage over it's competitors. It will do tasks faster, and more efficiently than the rest of the current generation hardware. So performance is just as good overall and battery life should be better.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks you, you really helped me make my decision of getting this phone
Sent from my LG-E739 using XDA Premium App
Don't believe everything you hear the s4 chip is a beast. Not as good as the sammy quad but i say better than tegra. Either way a duel core phone going toe to toe with either of theses processors speak for itself. It's a notice different from last generation duel core. It handles games without a hitch battery life omg all day long . This phone isn't perfect but it's Pretty darn close. I own the evo 4g lte with the s4 chip and it runs sense4 like butter no lag get the phone enjoy it. Development isn't where the international version is because the rest of the world78% to be exact got the same phone and little usa has to have there altered to work with lte. Plus they got theres before us. The u.s galaxy s3 development will pick up fast the delays and Verizon just getting it a few days plays a roll to.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using XDA Premium App
One question I have though, is what's the difference bettween att galaxy s3 and HTC one XL by att
They both are dual core
Both have snapdragon s4
1.5 ghz
And adrenno 255
So other than the fact the galaxy s3 has 2gb of ram, what's the difference?
Sent from my LG-E739 using XDA Premium App
yotorogo said:
One question I have though, is what's the difference bettween att galaxy s3 and HTC one XL by att
They both are dual core
Both have snapdragon s4
1.5 ghz
And adrenno 255
So other than the fact the galaxy s3 has 2gb of ram, what's the difference?
Sent from my LG-E739 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to be rude but you need to research the specs yourself, someone could say one has magic faeries inside for all you know.
The One X has a super lcd2 IPS display, while the GS3 has a samoled hd+ screen.
The One X has no removable storage or battery, while the GS3 has both.
The One X has 1gb of RAM, while the GS3 (USA) has 2gb.
The One X has Sense, we have TouchWiz
KillaHurtz said:
Not to be rude but you need to research the specs yourself, someone could say one has magic faeries inside for all you know.
The One X has a super lcd2 IPS display, while the GS3 has a samoled hd+ screen.
The One X has no removable storage or battery, while the GS3 has both.
The One X has 1gb of RAM, while the GS3 (USA) has 2gb.
The One X has Sense, we have TouchWiz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to be rude but I clealry indicated that I was talking about the us one by att also known as the HTC one XL
Also I did look up the specs myself on phonearena.com but I wanted to know what was the opinion of the wonderful people on xda
Sent from my LG-E739 using XDA Premium App
http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph6425/51292.png
As you can see here the nexus 4 scores much lower than the galaxy s3 running the dual core s4. These benchmarks shouldn't even be taken with a grain of salt if the dual core s4 out performs the quad core by such a large margin. Now I know this involves the 4, but I wonder if the same could be applied to the nexus 10. For example the nexus 10's sunspider benchmark is about half that of the chromebook and they have the same cpu at the same clock speed.
Look here how much higher the optimus g scores than the nexus 4.
http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph6426/51313.png
http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph6426/51314.png
My S3 is a quad not a dual. PS, note the resolutions?
MentaLrz said:
My S3 is a quad not a dual. PS, note the resolutions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know the international version is quad core, but it doesn't use the s4 quad. The tmobile galaxy s3 uses snapdragon s4 dual core. The resolutions are the same I believe due to the three buttons for home and such on the display. Also the resolution wouldn't affect sunspider or other cpu benchmarks.
On the nexus 4 the cpu under clocks itself because it gets too hot.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
ian1 said:
On the nexus 4 the cpu under clocks itself because it gets too hot.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't read anything where they mentioned the cpu underclocking itself. How can this be true if the optimus g is almost it's clone and doesn't have these issues? If I could get some links it would be greatly appreciated.
tcb4 said:
I didn't read anything where they mentioned the cpu underclocking itself. How can this be true if the optimus g is almost it's clone and doesn't have these issues? If I could get some links it would be greatly appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is in that very (mini) review you posted from anandtech, I am a huge follower of them, just Ctrl+F the word hot, I bet you will find out where they mentioned that the nexus 4 runs hot.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
akash3656 said:
It is in that very (mini) review you posted from anandtech, I am a huge follower of them, just Ctrl+F the word hot, I bet you will find out where they mentioned that the nexus 4 runs hot.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I searched for the word hot in their review and it didn't find any results. Either way does it mention that it underclocks due to the heat?
I have to believe that the performance in only going to get much much better with future updates from Google.. The result clearly show how premature the kernel is for 4.2.. Show in the N10 and the N4
It's quite possible that the benchmarks produce BS results.
philosopher09 said:
It's quite possible that the benchmarks produce BS results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im with you this... I highly doubt the iphone 5 outperforms my S3.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
Damn my infinity almost topped the iphone 5 in browser mark, here are some quadrant n sunspider. I was thinking of selling this beast 4 the n10 but nvm..
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using XDA Premium HD app
Oh wait i did lol didnt notice by 6,000 points haaa iphone5 lol
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using XDA Premium HD app
hit173 said:
Oh wait i did lol didnt notice by 6,000 points haaa iphone5 lol
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, what's your clock speed?
I hope the nexus 10 gets a bump to 2.0 ghz by some dev. That just sounds killer.
tcb4 said:
Lol, what's your clock speed?
I hope the nexus 10 gets a bump to 2.0 ghz by some dev. That just sounds killer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.8GHz
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app
hit173 said:
1.8GHz
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha ha, we'll I am tempted to pick up an infinity, but I really want the developer support that will come with a nexus device.
tkoreaper said:
Im with you this... I highly doubt the iphone 5 outperforms my S3.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in all honesty, i would not put it past the iphone 5 to beat the S3.
even if you ignore the benchmarks, which a lot seem to imply that the A6 gives even the 5250 in the nexus 10 a run for it's money in some (rare?) cases. (although the case of optimization argument may be made),
note that the PowerVR graphics chip in the iphone 5 is absolutely fantastic, as it seems apple are focusing more on bumping up graphics than CPU in the new A6.
(you should also bare in mind that it seems the A6 is A-15 based, compared to the A9 in the S3 international)
speaking of which. i'm pretty sure the dual core S4 in the S3 you have would be slower in most cases than the i9300 anyways,
so this idea that your s3 could beat the iphone 5 in raw power is a bit hopeful,
and definitely not in terms of games, loading apps ect, purely because of the whole iOS has less devices, ect ect.
Fissurez said:
in all honesty, i would not put it past the iphone 5 to beat the S3.
even if you ignore the benchmarks, which a lot seem to imply that the A6 gives even the 5250 in the nexus 10 a run for it's money in some (rare?) cases. (although the case of optimization argument may be made),
note that the PowerVR graphics chip in the iphone 5 is absolutely fantastic, as it seems apple are focusing more on bumping up graphics than CPU in the new A6.
(you should also bare in mind that it seems the A6 is A-15 based, compared to the A9 in the S3 international)
speaking of which. i'm pretty sure the dual core S4 in the S3 you have would be slower in most cases than the i9300 anyways,
so this idea that your s3 could beat the iphone 5 in raw power is a bit hopeful,
and definitely not in terms of games, loading apps ect, purely because of the whole iOS has less devices, ect ect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you may be right there, but I think the nexus 4's gpu is better than the one in the iphone 5. I mean look at glbenchmark, the nexus 4 has a higher fps running at a higher a resolution(egypt hd onscreen). Also the cpu is a quad core krait so I highly doubt the iphone can compete there. The only reason I bring this up is because you were claiming that the iphone 5 has a fanatastic gpu, when in reality it's very good, but I'm not sure it's the best.. You could argue that the iphone 5 scores higher in the fill rate and the triangle throughput, but I feel like these ones may be easier to rig as they are the ones that don't actually render a game.