Indian/Chinese 920s have Adreno 320? - Nokia Lumia 920

In phonemark, my bought in India 920 gets a graphic score of around 1200,compared to the normal one getting 800 something. So does this mean the rumours were true and these versions are much better than the international one?

As far as I know, Chinese version (so called 920T) still has Adreno 225.

I got 854. 920T released in China Mobile

Mine is a China Unicom version and scored 852 in graphics when tested individually,and 505 when I ran all the tests together. Anyway, the earlier leaked image of a China Mobile 920T sporting a quadcore qualcomm chip turned to have been faked. 1200 vs 850 that is a huge difference. I wonder how you managed to get such a high score, given that I and the another user called peiminglei have similar graphics scores. I would really like to see people from other countries post their scores as well. That would be very interesting. BTW mine firmware version is 1232.5951.1249.1002.

I was curious to see the score of my phone and did 10 consecutive graphics tests and here is the result:
Code:
1217 ( 986 msec)
1198 (1002 msec)
796 (1507 msec)
1167 (1028 msec)
1186 (1012 msec)
875 (1372 msec)
883 (1359 msec)
1080 (1111 msec)
1129 (1063 msec)
1106 (1085 msec)
Average:
1064 (1153 msec)
As you can see, there are couple of scores close to 1200, so I don't think the Chines version is different that the one in USA.

I have an AT&T US model and am getting anywhere from 978 to 1215. Most of the tests are over 1000.

800 to 1200 is a lot of variation for a benchmark. I only ran it once, and it got 1217ish, and also said I had the fastest graphic score. That's why I thought it had a 320(only other Adreno better than 225)

Nope, they shouldn't have different GPU. Haven't seen any of these 920Ts in the PhoneMark. If they are really better performing phones - there should be some results saved.

Related

A70H Quadrant

I ran a few Quadrant benchmarks with my A70H, and I found it to be pretty variable. In Overdrive, I got one just north of 1500, one 1700, and one over 1900.
I thought the HDD version would be slower than the SSD, but it seems a lot of the SSDs are running in the 1500-1700 range. Is this true?
Can't wait for a way to load custom, OC kernels on the HDD!

Vellamo Mobile Web Benchmark

https://market.android.com/details?id=com.quicinc.vellamo
I have been on it for a while and got "624"
Mine is 918
Set CPU to 1500 and got 833
Set CPU to 1800 and got 954
Stock CPU speed: 625
at 1728: 915
Mine is 589 !!!
Donno what does this mean?

Poor graphics performance in NFS

I have experienced some pretty choppy graphics when playing NFS Most Wanted with my i9300. The game stutters from time to time and by the looks of it it seems rendered at 20-22 FPS (not terribly laggy, but it's not good below 24).
So I decided to port NFS Most Wanted from my GS3 to my GS1 (i9000), which was probably incompatible from the market because of the "old" hardware. To my surprise, the game was rendered at a steady 40+ FPS with only the occasional stutter when 3+ cops are after me and 5 cars are on display. This, on a 1.14 Ghz Exynos Single core processor with a PowerVR SGX 540 card running at 200 Mhz.
Can someone tell me what is the reason behind this? Is this a Mali (ARM) specific problem? A Mali 400 running at 533 Mhz with the Exynos Quad should be able to smoke the SGX 540 running at 200 Mhz. Yes the SGX is powering a WVGA display I know, but with over twice the clock rate I don't see why the Mali should perform worse!
Experienced the same. I thought it was just a laggy game but I tried it on an Xperia Ion and was suprised that it turned out smoother than the SIII
works fine here. stock unrooted atm. i'm guessing over 40fps.
nikpik said:
Experienced the same. I thought it was just a laggy game but I tried it on an Xperia Ion and was suprised that it turned out smoother than the SIII
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ion has the Adreno 220 if i recall correctly? It should be more or less equal to Mali, but a Mali at that clock rate should be faster. Both the Ion and Sgs3 render 720p displays so its a fair fight there.
paintball23456 said:
works fine here. stock unrooted atm. i'm guessing over 40fps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I assume you are sticking with the stock clock rates as well (1.4 GHz CPU, 440 MHz GPU)? Are you on 4.1.2 or 4.1.1? I have tries both ELL5 4.1.2 and CM10.1 and they both produce similar results, but CM was slightly worse.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
ballsofsteel said:
Ion has the Adreno 220 if i recall correctly? It should be more or less equal to Mali, but a Mali at that clock rate should be faster. Both the Ion and Sgs3 render 720p displays so its a fair fight there.
I assume you are sticking with the stock clock rates as well (1.4 GHz CPU, 440 MHz GPU)? Are you on 4.1.2 or 4.1.1? I have tries both ELL5 4.1.2 and CM10.1 and they both produce similar results, but CM was slightly worse.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
stock 4.1.2 as i said unrooted. everything stock, clock speeds, drivers, etc. everything and works fine.
ballsofsteel said:
I have experienced some pretty choppy graphics when playing NFS Most Wanted with my i9300. The game stutters from time to time and by the looks of it it seems rendered at 20-22 FPS (not terribly laggy, but it's not good below 24).
So I decided to port NFS Most Wanted from my GS3 to my GS1 (i9000), which was probably incompatible from the market because of the "old" hardware. To my surprise, the game was rendered at a steady 40+ FPS with only the occasional stutter when 3+ cops are after me and 5 cars are on display. This, on a 1.14 Ghz Exynos Single core processor with a PowerVR SGX 540 card running at 200 Mhz.
Can someone tell me what is the reason behind this? Is this a Mali (ARM) specific problem? A Mali 400 running at 533 Mhz with the Exynos Quad should be able to smoke the SGX 540 running at 200 Mhz. Yes the SGX is powering a WVGA display I know, but with over twice the clock rate I don't see why the Mali should perform worse!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I too have no problem running the game. Runs smooth. Currently on ultima ROM
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

antutu benchmark too less

its 17400 only,
is only mine less or others too
The 3G model that you have has a slower processor (Cortex A7). For your model, your Antutu score sounds correct.

Why my Samsung s6 G92I benchmark are low?

My geekbench and even antutu benchmarks are low compared to other people. Me and my friend both got s6 recently. Mine is Indian version n his USA. His geekbench scores are single core - 1495 and multicore 5100.and mine is single core - 1422,multicore - 4536.
I never got beyond this.

Categories

Resources