People that call root jailbreak... - Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II

Kinda annoying. Ya think? Must have had an iPhone for a bit and can't quit!
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app

Usually just people who don't know too much about rooting and such and think jailbreak and root are the same.

On a side note we now do jailbreak Android.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2

Also gotta consider that most people's only exposure to smart phone terminology is from Icrap
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app

Do we really need a thread on this in the Verizon Note 2 Section?
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2

gowansta said:
Kinda annoying. Ya think? Must have had an iPhone for a bit and can't quit!
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I personally think that root being called root is annoying.
You don't add root to a phone, nor do you root a phone. You unlock access to the root user.

Well, let's coin a new term. Any idea's?!

gowansta said:
Kinda annoying. Ya think? Must have had an iPhone for a bit and can't quit!
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since Adam is the name behind unlocking the bootloader, he started calling it jailbreak due to the fact that there are now legal issues with "unlocking." Yes we all know the legal issue with unlocking is about unlocking to use on a different carrier. To make it easier for people to understand that he is not involved in unlocking carriers, we now jailbreak.
Sent From My Beans Powered Note2

BoostedB18C said:
Since Adam is the name behind unlocking the bootloader, he started calling it jailbreak due to the fact that there are now legal issues with "unlocking." Yes we all know the legal issue with unlocking is about unlocking to use on a different carrier. To make it easier for people to understand that he is not involved in unlocking carriers, we now jailbreak.
Sent From My Beans Powered Note2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Adam was calling it that well before it became illegal to unlock to another carrier.

adrynalyne said:
Adam was calling it that well before it became illegal to unlock to another carrier.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but its the jist of it and it provides a reason so people dont keep asking why
Sent From My Beans Powered Note2

BoostedB18C said:
Since Adam is the name behind unlocking the bootloader, he started calling it jailbreak due to the fact that there are now legal issues with "unlocking." Yes we all know the legal issue with unlocking is about unlocking to use on a different carrier. To make it easier for people to understand that he is not involved in unlocking carriers, we now jailbreak.
Sent From My Beans Powered Note2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it is not the same. Jailbreak is to make a device be able to accept sideloading applications. Android doesn't need to do this. So there is no jailbreak for Android.
Unlocking, though now illegal, is not jailbreaking (making a device to accept sideloading apps).
Calling unlocking "jailbreak" is just adding the confusion with less techy people.
Summary of Devices
Device: Samsung Galaxy Note 2 (SGH-T889)
Android Version: 4.1.1 Jelly Bean
Build: JRO03C.T889UVALL4 (Rooted)
Root Method: mrRobinson injected root stock rom
Superuser: SuperSu Pro v1.0
Busybox: Busybox v1.20.2
Device: Motorola DROID X
Android Version: 2.3.3 Gingerbread
Build: 4.5.605.Accurate_Battery (Rooted)

JaguarXT said:
But it is not the same. Jailbreak is to make a device be able to accept sideloading applications. Android doesn't need to do this. So there is no jailbreak for Android.
Unlocking, though now illegal, is not jailbreaking (making a device to accept sideloading apps).
Calling unlocking "jailbreak" is just adding the confusion with less techy people.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you dont like it, change it. If you can't change it, change your attitude about it.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2

gowansta said:
Kinda annoying. Ya think? Must have had an iPhone for a bit and can't quit!
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree 100%.
So annoying. There are lots of questions on Android forums now about jailbreaking Android. But there is no jailbreak in Android, because we have the sideloading settings within our settings menu (Settings > Security > Device administration > Unknown sources).
Calling unlocking a device with the name of "jailbreak" is just adding the confusion with the less techy people.
What really they are asking is "how to root my Android device".
But they need to understand is what root really is. And what it is to have administration permissions in any Unix/Linux, including Android. Only then they will stop calling root with the name "jailbreak".
Summary of Devices
Device: Samsung Galaxy Note 2 (SGH-T889)
Android Version: 4.1.1 Jelly Bean
Build: JRO03C.T889UVALL4 (Rooted)
Root Method: mrRobinson injected root stock rom
Superuser: SuperSu Pro v1.0
Busybox: Busybox v1.20.2
Device: Motorola DROID X
Android Version: 2.3.3 Gingerbread
Build: 4.5.605.Accurate_Battery (Rooted)
---------- Post added at 06:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:43 PM ----------
Dakota0206 said:
If you dont like it, change it. If you can't change it, change your attitude about it.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Talking about it is educating people about it. Educating people is what we can do to change it. That is what I am doing.
What are you doing?
Summary of Devices
Device: Samsung Galaxy Note 2 (SGH-T889)
Android Version: 4.1.1 Jelly Bean
Build: JRO03C.T889UVALL4 (Rooted)
Root Method: mrRobinson injected root stock rom
Superuser: SuperSu Pro v1.0
Busybox: Busybox v1.20.2
Device: Motorola DROID X
Android Version: 2.3.3 Gingerbread
Build: 4.5.605.Accurate_Battery (Rooted)
---------- Post added at 06:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:48 PM ----------
Dakota0206 said:
Do we really need a thread on this in the Verizon Note 2 Section?
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.
This is educating people to use the correct terminology. When they use correct terminology then they will get better responses to their questions.
Summary of Devices
Device: Samsung Galaxy Note 2 (SGH-T889)
Android Version: 4.1.1 Jelly Bean
Build: JRO03C.T889UVALL4 (Rooted)
Root Method: mrRobinson injected root stock rom
Superuser: SuperSu Pro v1.0
Busybox: Busybox v1.20.2
Device: Motorola DROID X
Android Version: 2.3.3 Gingerbread
Build: 4.5.605.Accurate_Battery (Rooted)

JaguarXT said:
Talking about it is educating people about it. Educating people is what we can do to change it. That is what I am doing.
What are you doing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You got me. The only thing I am doing is questioning the logic of "educating" people by posting on the second page of a device specific thread, and how that is going to lead to real change for the entire Android development community that isnt limited to just XDA. Especially when its just a hobby to 90% of the community.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2

It is what it is. We can all just accept that and move on
Sent From My Beans Powered Note2

Alright here comes my subjective take on this whole jailbreaking Android devices thing.
Do I hate it? Yep.
In my 3 years on Android and gaining root privileges on various devices I have never seen it referred to as jailbreaking, until I got this Note 2. Now I see it everywhere in the Android scenes.
Another thing I noticed is that with the Note 2 never have I seen so many iDerps come on the forums professing their new found relationships with Android and how they broke up with iOS. This thread can be considered useless but my God are those iConvert threads the Queens of Useless Threads. Why does anyone give a s*** that you converted to Android? Really?
Point being made here is that with the influx of iDolt users converting to Android there's an uncanny correlation with their terminology starting to crop up more and more.

JaguarXT said:
Agree 100%.
So annoying. There are lots of questions on Android forums now about jailbreaking Android. But there is no jailbreak in Android, because we have the sideloading settings within our settings menu (Settings > Security > Device administration > Unknown sources).
Calling unlocking a device with the name of "jailbreak" is just adding the confusion with the less techy people.
What really they are asking is "how to root my Android device".
But they need to understand is what root really is. And what it is to have administration permissions in any Unix/Linux, including Android. Only then they will stop calling root with the name "jailbreak".
Summary of Devices
Device: Samsung Galaxy Note 2 (SGH-T889)
Android Version: 4.1.1 Jelly Bean
Build: JRO03C.T889UVALL4 (Rooted)
Root Method: mrRobinson injected root stock rom
Superuser: SuperSu Pro v1.0
Busybox: Busybox v1.20.2
Device: Motorola DROID X
Android Version: 2.3.3 Gingerbread
Build: 4.5.605.Accurate_Battery (Rooted)
---------- Post added at 06:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:43 PM ----------
Talking about it is educating people about it. Educating people is what we can do to change it. That is what I am doing.
What are you doing?
Summary of Devices
Device: Samsung Galaxy Note 2 (SGH-T889)
Android Version: 4.1.1 Jelly Bean
Build: JRO03C.T889UVALL4 (Rooted)
Root Method: mrRobinson injected root stock rom
Superuser: SuperSu Pro v1.0
Busybox: Busybox v1.20.2
Device: Motorola DROID X
Android Version: 2.3.3 Gingerbread
Build: 4.5.605.Accurate_Battery (Rooted)
---------- Post added at 06:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:48 PM ----------
Yes.
This is educating people to use the correct terminology. When they use correct terminology then they will get better responses to their questions.
Summary of Devices
Device: Samsung Galaxy Note 2 (SGH-T889)
Android Version: 4.1.1 Jelly Bean
Build: JRO03C.T889UVALL4 (Rooted)
Root Method: mrRobinson injected root stock rom
Superuser: SuperSu Pro v1.0
Busybox: Busybox v1.20.2
Device: Motorola DROID X
Android Version: 2.3.3 Gingerbread
Build: 4.5.605.Accurate_Battery (Rooted)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess I need to get more tech savvy because I thought when I was buying and selling I phones (those things are gold) I wrote to and modified system files. I thought to accept the gevy unlock it psyched and changed system files. I guess I'm wing though because jail breaking is only for side loading apps.
Oh and we don't need that please tell me how to add Google wallet without root. By the way you know att blocked unknown apps before. So I guess then we did jail break or phones?
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2

JaguarXT said:
Unlocking, though now illegal
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is incorrect, unlocking the bootloader is not illegal, unlocking for other carriers is but that's not what this thread is about.

I don't see why it matters what you call it. Break it down and the words works.
Jail break. To remove restrictions and become free. Isn't that what we did? Removed a restricted boot loader to allow custom kernels and recovery which allows custom Roms.
Stop trying to be politically correct on this. If you're feelings are hurt over a simple word then your life must be depressing.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app

JaguarXT said:
Calling unlocking a device with the name of "jailbreak" is just adding the confusion with the less techy people.
What really they are asking is "how to root my Android device".
Talking about it is educating people about it. Educating people is what we can do to change it. That is what I am doing.
This is educating people to use the correct terminology. When they use correct terminology then they will get better responses to their questions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Before you educate others you must first learn it for yourself, unlocking the bootloader is not illegal, and you don't root your phone, you gain root access.
---------- Post added at 09:40 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:38 AM ----------
nosympathy said:
I don't see why it matters what you call it. Break it down and the words works.
Jail break. To remove restrictions and become free. Isn't that what we did? Removed a restricted boot loader to allow custom kernels and recovery which allows custom Roms.
Stop trying to be politically correct on this. If you're feelings are hurt over a simple word then your life must be depressing.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Add to the fact that the people trying to be PC are factually incorrect.

Related

New to Android

Hello all!
My first post here and expectedly, it's regarding the fundamentals of the Android platform..
I have just gotten a Huawei phone, a Huawei Honor to be specific. It's running on Android 4.1 which is Jellybean right?
Hmmm should I do an upgrade to ICS?
And what's this thing about rooting? Is it an requirement to root my phone?
Thanks for the help, much appreciated
y3kesprit said:
Hello all!
My first post here and expectedly, it's regarding the fundamentals of the Android platform..
I have just gotten a Huawei phone, a Huawei Honor to be specific. It's running on Android 4.1 which is Jellybean right?
Hmmm should I do an upgrade to ICS?
And what's this thing about rooting? Is it an requirement to root my phone?
Thanks for the help, much appreciated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Android 4.0.x was ICS. The newer version is 4.1.X called jelly beans. So you'd be basically downgrading if you went to ICS.
Rooting is done to allow you adminstrator priveliges in Linux, similar to being an administrator in Windows rather than a standard user. You don't need to be rooted, most of the thing can be done without rooting. However, as you continue to use your device, you will often find apps that require changes in the system, hence their requirement will be to be rooted. Trying out different ROMs, customising it so that your wife/gf doesn't recognise your device will P) require you to root your device. For most devices , its pretty simple to root. However, you will learn as you read through posts and threads, and watch videos. Welcome to the Android world!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
y3kesprit said:
Hello all!
My first post here and expectedly, it's regarding the fundamentals of the Android platform..
I have just gotten a Huawei phone, a Huawei Honor to be specific. It's running on Android 4.1 which is Jellybean right?
Hmmm should I do an upgrade to ICS?
And what's this thing about rooting? Is it an requirement to root my phone?
Thanks for the help, much appreciated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, 4.1 is Jellybean but ICS is a downgrade. It came before Jellybean so you're better off sticking with JB.
It's not a requirement to root your phone but it's great because it gives you complete control of the phone. More control than the phone companies want us to have.
But I would suggest that you don't concentrate on rooting just yet. I say this because you're new to Android and trying to learn too much too quickly can become really confusing.
Before you even think about being ready to root, use these forums and read up about rooting and you'll learn everything you need to know.
Sent from Sony Xperia S using XDA Premium
Join my threads here and here.
Check out this [GUIDE] How to be a New User (and not a noob)
Sorry I got it wrong!
My phone, after I did a check, is running 2.3.6, which is Gingerbread right?
Ok thanks for the replies. It was informational
Anyway, if I were to root the phone, every different version has its own process to root right?
For example if I am running 2.3.6, and root it.. After I do a upgrade to ICS, I would have to re-root right? Am I getting this right?
y3kesprit said:
Sorry I got it wrong!
My phone, after I did a check, is running 2.3.6, which is Gingerbread right?
Ok thanks for the replies. It was informational
Anyway, if I were to root the phone, every different version has its own process to root right?
For example if I am running 2.3.6, and root it.. After I do a upgrade to ICS, I would have to re-root right? Am I getting this right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes that's Gingerbread.
The bit you're wrong about is the rooting bit. Rooting a device doesn't allow you to update to ICS when you couldn't before. If all you want to do is update to ICS then you don't need to root, you just need to look into flashing the device. When flashing it puts a whole different eom, kernel, theme etc onto the device.
You'll be better off looking that up through threads here on XDA or by watching videos on YouTube to show you how to do it. That's how I learnt to do it all.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
KidCarter93 said:
Yes that's Gingerbread.
The bit you're wrong about is the rooting bit. Rooting a device doesn't allow you to update to ICS when you couldn't before. If all you want to do is update to ICS then you don't need to root, you just need to look into flashing the device. When flashing it puts a whole different eom, kernel, theme etc onto the device.
You'll be better off looking that up through threads here on XDA or by watching videos on YouTube to show you how to do it. That's how I learnt to do it all.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay...
So I want to root as well as upgrade to ICS, how should I go about doing it?
I will go do a youtube and forum search now as well
y3kesprit said:
Sorry I got it wrong!
My phone, after I did a check, is running 2.3.6, which is Gingerbread right?
Ok thanks for the replies. It was informational
Anyway, if I were to root the phone, every different version has its own process to root right?
For example if I am running 2.3.6, and root it.. After I do a upgrade to ICS, I would have to re-root right? Am I getting this right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That depends. If you root your phone, and YOU perform the upgrade, i.e. you flash a modded rom, 99.9% of the time the dev who created it will add the su(superuser) app into the rom so that you end up flashing the rom and re-rooting your phone in the process.
With that being said, if you happen to receive an OTA update randomly, telling you that android needs to update, and you decide that's what you want to run, flashing that one WILL take away your su privileges. That is due to the fact that these OTA's are pushed out by your phone manufacturer, and what you are trying to do (gain su access) isn't what the manufacturers wants you doing, per say, so THEY don't include the su app. Happy hacking. Number one tip I could give ya: don't b afraid to Google every question, or topic you're interested in. Make Google your best friend.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda app-developers app
y3kesprit said:
Okay...
So I want to root as well as upgrade to ICS, how should I go about doing it?
I will go do a youtube and forum search now as well
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Each device has a different method of rooting and flashing ROMs..... you can check out your device's forum here on xda where I'm sure you'll find a suitable guide to help you out. Happy flashing
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
The way I done it was to use the program SuperOneClick (there's a thread for that on here) then a few days later I got ParanoidAndroid flashed on to here (there's a thread for that aswell).
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Android Device Manager

After reading about how Android 4.3 and beyond will change root and the new device manager boots the phone into recovery.....and I'm sure that it won't wipe with a custom recovery. I'm guessing our days of crack flashing will come to an end in the future. Hopefully Google will find some ways to keep security in line and also stay friendly to the Development community.
There have been many devices put out that the manufacturers had declared unrootable that ended up rooted.
kennyglass123 said:
There have been many devices put out that the manufacturers had declared unrootable that ended up rooted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a difference between gaining root and being able to install custom ROM.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4
318sugarhill said:
After reading about how Android 4.3 and beyond will change root and the new device manager boots the phone into recovery.....and I'm sure that it won't wipe with a custom recovery. I'm guessing our days of crack flashing will come to an end in the future. Hopefully Google will find some ways to keep security in line and also stay friendly to the Development community.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesn't the new device manager run once the OS is booted?
Also, I don't think Google has any interest in blocking root and the development community. Look at their devices and play store: all of their Nexus and GE products are unlocked and their play store allows rooted apps. I think you're being paranoid.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 2
---------- Post added at 01:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:53 PM ----------
jmgib said:
There is a difference between gaining root and being able to install custom ROM.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but on devices without locked bootloaders (not so uncommon outside of Verizon and AT&T) installing custom ROMs and recoveries is pretty straight forward.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 2

[Q] S4 verizon I545VRUDMG7 root help

Hi,
I went through all the form to root my S4 verizon(unlocked) but nothings related to MG7 baseband??
my baseband version is MG7 is it different than others?? i coudnt find any post related to this version
Main problem is KNOX security is installed in my phone in system directory,
KNOX preventing me from root access(when i tried super user app i am getting a notification ""An application has been forced to stop for an unauthorized attempt to access system in your device"),
so i tried to uninstall the KNOX but I need a root privilage to uninstall it. I stuck in the loop.
after I found to bypass the KNOX I should use the certified application to get into root. (i may be wrong i am not sure) is their any way for me to root and install cynagenMod ?? or if helped in uninstalling KNOX i can root it.
Thanks in Advance.
FYI: BaseBand version is I545VRUDMG7 its verizon and unlocked now using AT&T
Wifilevel3 said:
Hi,
I went through all the form to root my S4 verizon(unlocked) but nothings related to MG7 baseband??
my baseband version is MG7 is it different than others?? i coudnt find any post related to this version
Main problem is KNOX security is installed in my phone in system directory,
KNOX preventing me from root access(when i tried super user app i am getting a notification ""An application has been forced to stop for an unauthorized attempt to access system in your device"),
so i tried to uninstall the KNOX but I need a root privilage to uninstall it. I stuck in the loop.
after I found to bypass the KNOX I should use the certified application to get into root. (i may be wrong i am not sure) is their any way for me to root and install cynagenMod ?? or if helped in uninstalling KNOX i can root it.
Thanks in Advance.
FYI: BaseBand version is I545VRUDMG7 its verizon and unlocked now using AT&T
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure it's MG7 and not MJ7? I did a quick Google search for I545VRUDMG7 and the only thing I found were the posts you created on this and other sites.
Maybe you could post a screen shot of your phone info.
Even Google says...
Did you mean MJ7???
Lol
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
riker147 said:
Are you sure it's MG7 and not MJ7? I did a quick Google search for I545VRUDMG7 and the only thing I found were the posts you created on this and other sites.
Maybe you could post a screen shot of your phone info.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it is MG7, ya I even google a lot about about it and coudnt get any info, so last resort I posted here, I attached the screen shot info please go through it.
Thank you.
Wifilevel3 said:
Yes it is MG7, ya I even google a lot about about it and coudnt get any info, so last resort I posted here, I attached the screen shot info please go through it.
Thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[
[/COLOR]Grab this app
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.vndnguyen.phoneinfo
Take a screenshot for us since I don't see the one you say you've posted here
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
Mistertac said:
OK my bad... Doing a little more searching it looks like you may have the i9500/Exynos S4
This is the i545 S4 for Verizon forum
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 02:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:15 PM ----------
Grab this app
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.vndnguyen.phoneinfo
Take a screenshot for us since I don't see the one you say you've posted here
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 02:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:20 PM ----------
I could be wrong idk..... just get us that screen shot. Your build matches up with another model from what I see but who knows
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I attached the another screen shot using that app u mentioned, please go through it. and what I am thinking is KNOX is the only think which is not allowing me to root my phone, is there any way to remove the KNOX??
Weird...its 4.2.2. ...is this pre mdk?anyone know what this is lol...never seen this version...if it is surge may want a good look at it
Maybe some sort of test build? Did you purchase the phone used? Generally S4 build numbers have followed a pattern. The second letter generally indicates a date, I believe. That's why MDK was most likely a May 2013 build, ME7 was a June 2013 build, etc. So this may be somewhere in between ME7 and MI1. I would say this device could be a rare gem and may even provide more information towards a BL exploit.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
Its very strange I could only find i9500 with similar build number but clearly that shows as an i545. Someone here will know. He says he has Knox on there though?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
phobia09 said:
Maybe some sort of test build? Did you purchase the phone used? Generally S4 build numbers have followed a pattern. The second letter generally indicates a date, I believe. That's why MDK was most likely a May 2013 build, ME7 was a June 2013 build, etc. So this may be somewhere in between ME7 and MI1. I would say this device could be a rare gem and may even provide more information towards a BL exploit.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, its a used phone. Is there any way to root or to Uninstall KNOX which prevent root ?? to install CyanogenMod.!!
Wifilevel3 said:
Yes, its a used phone. Is there any way to root or to Uninstall KNOX which prevent root ?? to install CyanogenMod.!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would think it could be rooted with Kingo. I would try that first.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2473747
Please let us know if that works.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
Wait you dont have root on this? Try saferoot or any of the root methods we have they should work. Next it would be helpful if you sent me your bootloaders would you be willing to help us? Also please refrain from installing Cyanogenmod for a little bit until I can get some of the partitions from your device. Also don't upgrade the baseband yet either please.
There was a reason they didnt release this build. It would be helpful to know why I need to analyze the bootloaders from this build. I hope you read this soon and above all else do NOT update your phone!
Surge1223 said:
Wait you dont have root on this? Try saferoot or any of the root methods we have they should work. Next it would be helpful if you sent me your bootloaders would you be willing to help us? Also please refrain from installing Cyanogenmod for a little bit until I can get some of the partitions from your device. Also don't upgrade the baseband yet either please.
There was a reason they didnt release this build. It would be helpful to know why I need to analyze the bootloaders from this build. I hope you read this soon and above all else do NOT update your phone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope he listens to you surge
Wifilevel3 said:
Yes, its a used phone. Is there any way to root or to Uninstall KNOX which prevent root ?? to install CyanogenMod.!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey did you happen to root the phone yet? And how about helping out the community and sending Surge what he mentioned... That'd be huge
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
Bumping this thread so maybe WiFilevel3 sees it
I sent the OP a message. Hopefully something comes of it.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
Mistertac said:
Hey did you happen to root the phone yet? And how about helping out the community and sending Surge what he mentioned... That'd be huge
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes , I can root my phone and I can help surge NP in it.
Wifilevel3 said:
yes , I can root my phone and I can help surge NP in it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any contribution is MUCH appreciated. Thanks for helping.
Wifilevel3 said:
yes , I can root my phone and I can help surge NP in it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess @Surge1223 can send you pm's on how to extract the needed files to find more about your bootloader. He could probably write a script for you.
@Surge1223 he had asked me couple hours ago how to pm you. So if you guys arent already in contact maybe shoot him a message.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

[Q] Help upgrading to KitKat + re-rooting?

Hey guys! So, just a quick recap of my life with my Verizon Galaxy S4: I got it back in June and rooted it (using "I545ALL-IN-ONE-TOOL") within a couple hours of having it up and running. It is my first Android phone. I then disabled the service that persistently alerted me of Android updates (so that I would keep my root). I now would like to update to KitKat.
Currently, here are my phone's software specifications (I apologize if I include unnecessary information!):
Model number: SCH-I545
Android version: 4.2.2
Baseband version: I545VRUAMDK
Kernel version: 3.4.0-562219
Build number: JDQ39.I545VRUAMDK
I am just kind of lost as to how I would go about updating to KitKat. I would like to keep TouchWiz, because I use the IR and Camera features, as well as a few other things here and there that I would miss if I lost.
Finally, once I'm up to TouchWiz KitKat, I would like to root it, so I could disable/remove some bloaty parts of TouchWiz and just the general perks of rooting.
I have tried to look through the stickies a few times to find out how to do it on my own, but I kinda got confused.
Any help at all would be greatly appreciated, and let me know if any further information is needed.
Jesse402 said:
Hey guys! So, just a quick recap of my life with my Verizon Galaxy S4: I got it back in June and rooted it (using "I545ALL-IN-ONE-TOOL") within a couple hours of having it up and running. It is my first Android phone. I then disabled the service that persistently alerted me of Android updates (so that I would keep my root). I now would like to update to KitKat.
Currently, here are my phone's software specifications (I apologize if I include unnecessary information!):
Model number: SCH-I545
Android version: 4.2.2
Baseband version: I545VRUAMDK
Kernel version: 3.4.0-562219
Build number: JDQ39.I545VRUAMDK
I am just kind of lost as to how I would go about updating to KitKat. I would like to keep TouchWiz, because I use the IR and Camera features, as well as a few other things here and there that I would miss if I lost.
Finally, once I'm up to TouchWiz KitKat, I would like to root it, so I could disable/remove some bloaty parts of TouchWiz and just the general perks of rooting.
I have tried to look through the stickies a few times to find out how to do it on my own, but I kinda got confused.
Any help at all would be greatly appreciated, and let me know if any further information is needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would suggest simply flashing Echoe since you're on MDK: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2702592
Jesse402 said:
Hey guys! So, just a quick recap of my life with my Verizon Galaxy S4: I got it back in June and rooted it (using "I545ALL-IN-ONE-TOOL") within a couple hours of having it up and running. It is my first Android phone. I then disabled the service that persistently alerted me of Android updates (so that I would keep my root). I now would like to update to KitKat.
Currently, here are my phone's software specifications (I apologize if I include unnecessary information!):
Model number: SCH-I545
Android version: 4.2.2
Baseband version: I545VRUAMDK
Kernel version: 3.4.0-562219
Build number: JDQ39.I545VRUAMDK
I am just kind of lost as to how I would go about updating to KitKat. I would like to keep TouchWiz, because I use the IR and Camera features, as well as a few other things here and there that I would miss if I lost.
Finally, once I'm up to TouchWiz KitKat, I would like to root it, so I could disable/remove some bloaty parts of TouchWiz and just the general perks of rooting.
I have tried to look through the stickies a few times to find out how to do it on my own, but I kinda got confused.
Any help at all would be greatly appreciated, and let me know if any further information is needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
be aware that kitkat is not rootable on verizon phones yet
decaturbob said:
be aware that kitkat is not rootable on verizon phones yet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is the "Echoe" thing then? It says it's pre-rooted, and is 4.4.2.
Oishikatta said:
I would suggest simply flashing Echoe since you're on MDK: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2702592
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not true
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda app-developers app
epicroot said:
Not true
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait could you explain to me what exactly isn't true? Sorry, still confused.
Jesse402 said:
Hey guys! So, just a quick recap of my life with my Verizon Galaxy S4: I got it back in June and rooted it (using "I545ALL-IN-ONE-TOOL") within a couple hours of having it up and running. It is my first Android phone. I then disabled the service that persistently alerted me of Android updates (so that I would keep my root). I now would like to update to KitKat.
Currently, here are my phone's software specifications (I apologize if I include unnecessary information!):
Model number: SCH-I545
Android version: 4.2.2
Baseband version: I545VRUAMDK
Kernel version: 3.4.0-562219
Build number: JDQ39.I545VRUAMDK
I am just kind of lost as to how I would go about updating to KitKat. I would like to keep TouchWiz, because I use the IR and Camera features, as well as a few other things here and there that I would miss if I lost.
Finally, once I'm up to TouchWiz KitKat, I would like to root it, so I could disable/remove some bloaty parts of TouchWiz and just the general perks of rooting.
I have tried to look through the stickies a few times to find out how to do it on my own, but I kinda got confused.
Any help at all would be greatly appreciated, and let me know if any further information is needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since you have an original MDK S4 you should just root it , install a custom recovery, then you can flash all sorts of ROMs Touchwiz or AOSP.
Is your phone rooted? If so do you have a custom recovery?
Root your phone using this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2290796
Then since you appear to be new at this I'd suggest just using Goo or Flashify to install your custom recovery
Here's Flashify https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.cgollner.flashify
Then learn how to make a backup in recovery and do that.
Then look around these forums for whatever ROM best suits you.
There are KitKat Touchwiz ROMs that you can install that come from the International S4.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
---------- Post added at 04:52 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:43 AM ----------
By the way I just over looked the part where your already rooted so my bad... Its early what can I say.
Anyways here is the link to a patch we use to enable us to run international S4 Touchwiz 4.4 ROMs .
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2674280
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
jrkruse has made a flashable version of the verizon leak: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2721118
So that's probably the best option now for stock-kitkat. If you don't have a custom recovery, the easiest way would be to use goomanager and simply use 'install openrecoveryscript' from the options menu.

Verizon Galaxy S 4 5.0.1 VRUGOF1

So, I've been having one hard time figuring this out. It seems to be hard to find, or I'm not looking for the right things, so I come seeking your help.
I have a Galaxy S4 (obviously, lol), here's all about it:
Model Number: SCH-I545
Android Version: 5.0.1
Baseband Version: i545VRUGOF1
Build Number: LRX22C.I545VRUGOF1
Can someone tell me if I can root it or not? Towelroot and Kingroot do not work for it. I'm guessing that's because the software is still too new. So, might it just be that there is no root for it yet?
If so, is there anyway I can get rid of the bloatware (it's so frustrating!)?
Thank you in advance!
If on stock OF1, no there is no root for it, and no downgrade options either, as bootloader was updated and locked anything below OF1
bangdosa said:
If on stock OF1, no there is no root for it, and no downgrade options either, as bootloader was updated and locked anything below OF1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And I am on OF1, correct?
xuntamed said:
And I am on OF1, correct?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is correct, look at the last 3 letters in your build number.
sent from a Galaxy far far away.
So is this a 'hopefully someday' situation?
Help required
I HAVE GALAXY S4 I545 WITH 4.4.2 NK1 FIRMWARE i downloaded of1 update from sammobile.com and not instlling it because i m afraid it may lock network i m in pakistan please confirm it lock network or not please
There is no root for OF1 so the bootloader is locked on OF1, if that's what you're asking.
supposedly this thing SRS ROOT can do it but it can't root mines. Though, the computer reads out that it does.
I used the kingroot no pc apk download. [
It worked fine for me
Yep, use kingroot.
I found that last night that KINGO ROOT is working on sch-i545 build VRUGOF1.
Link for future reference. The old method is better imo. Root is possible with kingroot but didn't work when i swithed to supersu
You have to use kingroot to grant a terminal su permission, then uninstall kingroot, and lastly install SuperSU via the terminal. Google it for a more in-depth walkthrough. I did it in 5 minutes sitting in my car. SuperSU is better, and it plays nice with more apps. Good luck! Message me if you need a link.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA-Developers mobile app
if you just bought the phone and you was like *oh yeah, now I can customize the **** out of him* that must be a big disappoint like me you can't do **** with the device :d until the deves unlock it but if that even will happend .... just hopes
My sister in law just jumped from an iPhone to a Verizon Galaxy S4 (i545VRUGOF1) on Android 5.0.1
I'm currently with Tmobile on an S6 (rooted etc.) and have been since the S3 so I am accustomed to rooting etc. However, the root procedure for the Tmobile variant is obviously different.
Anyways, she wants me to root hers and so far as I can tell Kingroot is said to work and I can then remove it and replace with SuperSU.
My question though is what recovery works with this variant? I'm a TWRP guy myself but it doesn't sound like flashing TWRP via Odin will work with this Verizon S4.
Any feedback is appreciated. Thanks and rock on...
Ahhh, the lollipop update irreparably locks the bootloader so you can't even sideload twrp. Sorry man, but you're stuck. You can still root it tho...piece of cake. Use kingroot, then replace it with SuperSU. Instructions are in the link: http://www.w0lfdroid.com/2015/05/How-to-Remove-Replace-KingUser-KingRoot-with-SuperSU.html?m=1
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA-Developers mobile app
---------- Post added at 06:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:32 PM ----------
Right. Sorry, just reiterating for other readers.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Airsoftjunky said:
Ahhh, the lollipop update irreparably locks the bootloader so you can't even sideload twrp. Sorry man, but you're stuck. You can still root it tho...piece of cake. Use kingroot, then replace it with SuperSU. Instructions are in the link: http://www.w0lfdroid.com/2015/05/How-to-Remove-Replace-KingUser-KingRoot-with-SuperSU.html?m=1
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA-Developers mobile app
---------- Post added at 06:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:32 PM ----------
Right. Sorry, just reiterating for other readers.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm. No recovery at all then. Ah well...those are the breaks I guess. Thanks for confirming root.
Sent from my SM-G920T using XDA-Developers mobile app
Airsoftjunky said:
Ahhh, the lollipop update irreparably locks the bootloader so you can't even sideload twrp. Sorry man, but you're stuck. You can still root it tho...piece of cake. Use kingroot, then replace it with SuperSU. Instructions are in the link: http://www.w0lfdroid.com/2015/05/How-to-Remove-Replace-KingUser-KingRoot-with-SuperSU.html?m=1
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA-Developers mobile app
---------- Post added at 06:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:32 PM ----------
Right. Sorry, just reiterating for other readers.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read a few posts that alluded to it being possible to flash the Kitkat firmware via Odin. Yay or nay?
Sent from my SM-G920T using XDA-Developers mobile app
Oh dear. I recall being able to reflash the bootloader etc on a g3 using Odin...to roll it back...but that was over a year ago. About the s4...probably not. Worst case, you brick it. Otherwise it just won't boot. In other words, I would be really surprised. I'll think about it and let you know if I remember anything. The best way to confirm or negate would be to Google it.
The only reason they were rolling back to KitKat was to root it early in the lollipop stages, I think. The bootloader was already and permanently upgraded. -I think. I'm tied and groggy right now...
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Yeah I was Google it but couldn't find anything concrete. It would seem to work and I doubt a hard brick would ensue. A soft brick could be recovered using Kies or smartswitch though in most cases. Thanks
Sent from my SM-G920T using XDA-Developers mobile app

Categories

Resources