Just like the title says. I've been searching for a while now with no luck. Can one point me in the right direction? Thanks!
acompres said:
Just like the title says. I've been searching for a while now with no luck. Can one point me in the right direction? Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
viper has its own custom kernal or atleast sense 5 does.
There's only 2 custom kernels for sense roms, one sense 4 and one sense 5 and they are not currently supported anymore. They are crpalmers sense kernel (sense 4) and beastmode by zarboz (sense 5) You can find them in the developement threads. Any other kernels such as joelz or viper are basically stock kernels.
xlxcrossing said:
There's only 2 custom kernels for sense roms, one sense 4 and one sense 5 and they are not currently supported anymore. They are crpalmers sense kernel (sense 4) and beastmode by zarboz (sense 5) You can find them in the developement threads. Any other kernels such as joelz or viper are basically stock kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thought cr had sense 5 kernal also
thayl0 said:
thought cr had sense 5 kernal also
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope. I contacted him about developing one and he stated that he he used aosp so he had no intention of producing another sense kernel.
xlxcrossing said:
Nope. I contacted him about developing one and he stated that he he used aosp so he had no intention of producing another sense kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Technically, that was about producing one without kernel source. When HTC releases kernel source code, I'll probably build a version with it unless it requires some major reworking.
crpalmer said:
Technically, that was about producing one without kernel source. When HTC releases kernel source code, I'll probably build a version with it unless it requires some major reworking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for clarifying. It should be noted for people wondering such as the OP in this case that a true custom kernel requires source to be released. I'm not sure which features zarboz put in beastmode 3.0.
xlxcrossing said:
Thanks for clarifying. It should be noted for people wondering such as the OP in this case that a true custom kernel requires source to be released. I'm not sure which features zarboz put in beastmode 3.0.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Zarboz made some display changes to make the source code we have work with 4.2.2 ROMs. Without, the display doesn't work at all.
crpalmer said:
Zarboz made some display changes to make the source code we have work with 4.2.2 ROMs. Without, the display doesn't work at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see, the lesson here being if source isn't released then you're stuck with modified stock kernels.
Related
[KERNEL] International FROST Kernel
NOTICE: This is COMPATIBLE with AOSP+ AND PureAosp JellyBean 4.3!
Just a statement regarding kernel source: The Kernel Source is of course covered under GPL version 2. Free software does NOT mean no work or time was spent working on it. I have donated a large sum of my free time to hack this kernel. If you use my modified kernel source in parts or in its entirety, I kindly ask you mention its origins and to send me a github pull request or PM whenever you find bugs or think you can help improve my kernel hack further. This way the entire community will truly benefit from the spirit of open source. Thank you !
THIS KERNEL IS CURRENTLY IN TESTING STATUS AND NOT BETA OR STABLE
*Features*
Quad Core is disabled by default, the X+ will now turn into a Dual core device (this can be changed with the performance governor)
Memory features are = to that of a 3.4 android kernel
more to come
XDA:DevDB Information
Frost, a Kernel for the HTC One X+
Contributors
Lloir, tombriden, corne, Maxwen, faux123
Kernel Special Features:
Version Information
Status: Testing
Created 2013-09-18
Last Updated 2013-09-30
Reserved
Reserved
Re: [KERNEL] SUPER WIP Pizza Kernel AT&T
Thb I know I dont have this phone but I planing on getting it and didn't see a linaro optimized just saying its a change of pace ...if u don't put it in its cool and anyone saying linaro doesn't do anything is crazy if its there why not use it ..its different could mean better
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
don728871 said:
Thb I know I dont have this phone but I planing on getting it and didn't see a linaro optimized just saying its a change of pace ...if u don't put it in its cool and anyone saying linaro doesn't do anything is crazy if its there why not use it ..its different could mean better
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure the Linaro optimizations consist of both changes made to the Android Open Source Project (and CM) as well as a special toolchain that uses GCC 4.7. Because this is a kernel that is only offered in its source form, it is up to you to build it with the Linaro toolchain if you want to see the performance benefits that can arise from the Linaro optimizations. Also Lloir was somewhat specific in telling you not to make feature requests (I would consider Linaro such a request), so you might want to read his post a bit more closely next time.
The link doesn't work! It's dead link!
Can you fix it?
fantik_m said:
The link doesn't work! It's dead link!
Can you fix it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can go here. This is the most up to date that i could find.
TheJokah said:
You can go....... This is the most up to date that i could find.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks but same sh***it bro...
fantik_m said:
Thanks but same sh***it bro...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a link to the kernel source. you would have to build the kernel yourself. if your looking for a CM kernel for ATT HOX+, then i would wait for a fully working CM rom first. There is still audio issues with CM, however devs are working on it. Be patient :laugh:
TheJokah said:
This is a link to the kernel source. you would have to build the kernel yourself. if your looking for a CM kernel for ATT HOX+, then i would wait for a fully working CM rom first. There is still audio issues with CM, however devs are working on it. Be patient :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and i'm ultra busy this month so i have VERY little time to debug or work on ATT X+
Lloir said:
and i'm ultra busy this month so i have VERY little time to debug or work on ATT X+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can take as long as you want. Nobody is trying to rush your fantastic work. Keep it up bro! :highfive:
[No message]
As stated in the cm 10.1 dev thread lets keep the general CM discussions here instead of cluttering the dev thread.
Great idea - now we can have all the misguided, misinformed speculation we want as to what hurdles have yet to be cleared before the DNA gets official CM nightly support
jk
Haha, exactly.
Actually, I think efforts might soon be underway to port straight AOSP as well I hope what I've heard (I can't give details, so please don't ask) comes to fruition.
That'd be great. I've been trying to learn more about programming and the build system so I can start helping out with some of it. I've setup ubuntu and sync and build cm every couple of days and I've been messing with building aokp since its based on cm.
AOKP, PA, PAC ROMs me want
Also some AOSP kernels as well
Sent from my TF300T using Tapatalk 2
I made a few changes and aokp started to build but I came across an error and haven't had time to look into it. If I get it built I'll try to learn some more about git and upload the source
skynet11 said:
Actually, I think efforts might soon be underway to port straight AOSP as well I hope what I've heard (I can't give details, so please don't ask) comes to fruition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why pure aosp as opposed to CM?
123421342 said:
Why pure aosp as opposed to CM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because a lot of popular ROMs out there are based on AOSP rather than on CM. Besides, there's always room for both right?
I'd love to try pure AOSP. I've always had HTC devices so I never got the pure Android experience.
123421342 said:
Why pure aosp as opposed to CM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because I want android and not all the stuff that comes with CM, if I want themes and mods ill do them myself
Does anyone have any resources that break down the build process?
I'm pretty excited for the 10.1 rom to become a daily driver. Once it's complete I hope to see possible other roms that are desensed... I'm sick of sense! I want some unadulterated android (or close to it)!
why would you want an aosp kernel? how are they better?
atishpatel2012 said:
why would you want an aosp kernel? how are they better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sense kernels won't work on aosp and the stock one they included in CM can't be overclocked or undervolted.
Nowak4G said:
Sense kernels won't work on aosp and the stock one they included in CM can't be overclocked or undervolted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel we are using right now is our stock kernel with cm commits. It doesn't include overclock or any other features because they could cause more bugs. Better to work all the bugs out of cm before you start doing things that could introduce more. Cplamer has already said that he has run a custom kernel with cm on his DNA so it is definitely going to happen. Just have to wait or build your own kernel unfortunately.
amathophobia said:
The kernel we are using right now is our stock kernel with cm commits. It doesn't include overclock or any other features because they could cause more bugs. Better to work all the bugs out of cm before you start doing things that could introduce more. Cplamer has already said that he has run a custom kernel with cm on his DNA so it is definitely going to happen. Just have to wait or build your own kernel unfortunately.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The other reason is because they're making so many changes to cm right now to get it working that a new kernel would have to be released for every update. I believe T1gartist has been running cm oc'd with a custom kernel as well
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
If you have the source it's not hard to add overclocking.
I'm not a dev or anything but I built AOKP
TheDanimal said:
I'm not a dev or anything but I built AOKP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can u upload the build.
I wud like to test it out.
What all features are working ? Are all" Whats Working" features CM10.1 working for it ?
Sorry for asking all these questions.
BTW, u should create a new thread in Orig. Android Dev. with AOKP build :victory:
I just saw this : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=41115145
Will this affect us who love the JB ROMs as there is no Kernel Source for JB yet from hTC
It will affect us if we post JB ROMs which are not based on stock kernel without releasing the source code. So I think we should show up in the thread there and start gathering devices which face the same or a similar problem, so we can form a greater community against those manufacturers.
Yes it will affect, basically according to it your JB ROM is against rules
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
What I understand is, if using the stock boot.img and there is no source code for it, we have to remove the boot.img from the ROM as every users supposed to have the stock boot.img in their device.
I have no problem to remove the boot.img but the problem is we have many noobs which are not so sure with all the workaround and how to get things done
buggingme said:
Yes it will affect, basically according to it your JB ROM is against rules
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I still can post the ROM but without the boot.img... so the ICS hboot users will have a hard time
ckpv5 said:
I still can post the ROM but without the boot.img... so the ICS hboot users will have a hard time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If we were to make a custom kernel, would we still have to provide source?
hcdav said:
If we were to make a custom kernel, would we still have to provide source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes obviously :laugh:
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
Hi
ckpv5 said:
I still can post the ROM but without the boot.img... so the ICS hboot users will have a hard time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good::goodont worry, you can unpack the stock boot.img. Just make some harmless changes in ramdisk and repack it. Then share the modified ramdisk on github along with zImage.
PM me if you need help on this.
Regards
Yasir
P.S. I know its a workaround, so some xda recognized dev is welcome to correct me if what i said above is wrong.:good::good:
I found This:
zelendel says:
"This is not so. The kernel source HAS to be made available. If the OEM doesnt provide the kernel source then no rom for that device will be allowed. OEMs post the source code for their kernels. Well most do anyway, the ones that dont are in violation of the GPL laws.
What ever kernel is in the rom that is posted must have available kernel source. If roms are using the stock kernel and no sources are available then it will be removed. If it is using a custom kernel based on the clone source and a link to the source can be provided then that is fine. But the source MUST match the kernel in the rom."
So i guess, custom JB Rom by you is in danger of removal.
neXus PRIME said:
So i guess, custom JB Rom by you is in danger of removal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is ok if I remove the kernel.
It just that I don't have much time to redo the ROM.
I'll try to find time to make init.d support without ramdisk mod and post updated ROM.
If I don't have enough time, I can only upload a new ROM after I come back from vacation in mid June
hcdav said:
If we were to make a custom kernel, would we still have to provide source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats whole point of zelendels post, also dont like to hear that, i think i have to download roms I wanted to try next week in advance
Now the question is whether we can boot jb with our ics kernel or not.
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
prototype-U said:
Now the question is whether we can boot jb with our ics kernel or not.
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried. Used ics zimage with jb ram disk. Logcat is ok . Display never appears. Unlocks n vibrates. But you can't see anything
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
Could it be possible just to use kernel from kernel.org, config from ICS HTC and adjusting this config a bit so that it works or is the kernel from android too much different from the linux kernel?
So i unnecessarily try to use prebuilt 3.4 kernel for cm10.1 because if it will working, i won't be able to share it -.-
atis112 said:
So i unnecessarily try to use prebuilt 3.4 kernel for cm10.1 because if it will working, i won't be able to share it -.-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your hard work is nonetheless appreciated, thank you for that and also your efforts towards organising the petition etc.
Ok, but if I'm not mistaken, as soon as HTC releases JB's kernel sources every ROM based on it will be "legal" or according to xda rules and not been removed right?
May be they're waiting for every country to get JB by OTA to release them (I believe only India doesn't have received it yet if I'm not mistaken).
By the way @atis112, did you get any answer from GPL?
Have you all a great day
Enviado desde mi HTC Desire X usando Tapatalk 2
gbueno6 said:
Ok, but if I'm not mistaken, as soon as HTC releases JB's kernel sources every ROM based on it will be "legal" or according to xda rules and not been removed right?
May be they're waiting for every country to get JB by OTA to release them (I believe only India doesn't have received it yet if I'm not mistaken).
By the way @atis112, did you get any answer from GPL?
Have you all a great day
Enviado desde mi HTC Desire X usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not yet. I think we need to wait some weeks for their answere.
Another point to note ... no recovery for JB ??
zelendel said:
If a recovery is being posted for a device that has no kernel source then it is removed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ckpv5 said:
Another point to note ... no recovery for JB ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems to be... So we should download the existing recoveries as fast as we can before they are deleted...
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda premium
ckpv5 said:
Another point to note ... no recovery for JB ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Recovery working fine with ics kernel on JB too.
Hi,
I want to build an AOSP kernel from source. I'm running a 5.1.1 AOSP build, so I'm trying to find out where I can get the source for 5.1.1 AOSP. Is there any source code for all Qualcomm MSM chipset devices in general? Thanks.
Bump; anyone got ideas?
You will have to find the source for your device. There is no one for all kernel source. If you are already running an aosp build then the kernel is already included
zelendel said:
You will have to find the source for your device. There is no one for all kernel source. If you are already running an aosp build then the kernel is already included
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So would I build with that kernel? Or can I use Motorola source? Will Motorola's 5.0.2 source code work with 5.1.1?
GreyArmour said:
So would I build with that kernel? Or can I use Motorola source? Will Motorola's 5.0.2 source code work with 5.1.1?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It may work but there will be bugs. As for the source that depends on the device your using and the set up. I have not touched a moto in years but I know that stick HTC and Samsung kernels don't work on aosp based roms so you will have tons if trouble shooting to do if you try
zelendel said:
It may work but there will be bugs. As for the source that depends on the device your using and the set up. I have not touched a moto in years but I know that stick HTC and Samsung kernels don't work on aosp based roms so you will have tons if trouble shooting to do if you try
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK. Would using the kernel that came with my AOSP ROM to build a kernel be wrong or is that alright?
still no aosp rom with oms support . aosp roms runs better than cm roms in my view .
sudipto ranjan said:
still no aosp rom with oms support . aosp roms runs better than cm roms in my view .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good luck for building one by your self
Sent from my Redmi 3S using Tapatalk
I asked to know if any aosp rom is under construction or not
sudipto ranjan said:
I asked to know if any aosp rom is under construction or not
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, you didn't ask anything, there are no question marks in the OP.
The kernel source its there, Android source is there too. Go build yourself a ROM.
The closest right now is LineageOS, you can find it on Development section
moralesnery said:
No, you didn't ask anything, there are no question marks in the OP.
The kernel source its there, Android source is there too. Go build yourself a ROM.
The closest right now is LineageOS, you can find it on Development section
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
stop being so rude lol non one asked you to build it,go build yourself a better attitude. He just asked is there rom since all roms so far are full of bugs.
moralesnery said:
No, you didn't ask anything, there are no question marks in the OP.
The kernel source its there, Android source is there too. Go build yourself a ROM.
The closest right now is LineageOS, you can find it on Development section
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1st of all who the hell asked you to build ??
So why are you doing this show off.if devs want to build they will. We are here to give our opinion and suggestion.
How about we all take a chill pill and relax a little for a bit. There are clear misunderstandings from posts that could have been worded more clearly, so we'll leave it at that.
As for AOSP roms running smoother than CM/LOS, CM/LOS is based on AOSP. Speed in roms is different the type of changes that are implemented into the rom, like how AOSPA is using LTO throughout their repos. Some AOSP roms add in compiler optimizations to speed up performance (like AOSPA), but it will cause regressions on certain devices with older/faulty hardware. Just my 2 cents, overall, performance on CM/LOS is not much different than any other AOSP rom out there, since they're essentially the same when it's down to the basics.