Which rom and kernel do you use - Nexus 6P General

Just looking to find people's preferences to which rom and kernel people use and why they enjoy using that combination.
Share your configurations with the community and help others discover new ways to use their phones

Stock ROM with Franco Kernel. When Google will drop support I will install Pure Nexus.
Sent from Enterprise bridge

Currently using Dirty Unicorns 11.5 and flash kernel with balanced profile for features, frequent updates and battery life.
There's also this thread where we share ROMs and mods:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3494191
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

darkrom+stock kernel+naptime+wakeblock+arise

DU + EX

I am running the latest Pure Nexus and latest EX Kernel. If I let my phone completely die, I would be getting about 4 hours SOT.

i root SGH i777 said:
I am running the latest Pure Nexus and latest EX Kernel. If I let my phone completely die, I would be getting about 4 hours SOT.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wish google never went with the 810 :/ Considering the battery size, life should be much better. I'm lucky to hit 5.

Related

[Q] AOSP Vs Samsung ROM. Battery Life

Been thinking about this and cant decide, well wonder if anyone knows.
Do people think that the Samsung ROMS de-bloated and stripped to minimum with a decent Kernel, have better battery life than say a AOSP ROM, with a custom Kernel?
Just a thought!?
superleeds27 said:
Been thinking about this and cant decide, well wonder if anyone knows.
Do people think that the Samsung ROMS de-bloated and stripped to minimum with a decent Kernel, have better battery life than say a AOSP ROM, with a custom Kernel?
Just a thought!?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For sure, why not matey?
Look at my results
Sent via my s2 monster
Where are your results?
The maximum I ever achieved on a Samsung ROM was just under 7 hours screen time with stock battery. Max I've ever got on AOSP is 5 hours screen time. But I've just flashed a new kernel so I have yet to see if that makes a noticeable difference.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
superleeds27 said:
Where are your results?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=25243106&postcount=528
What do you think matey?
Sent via my s2 monster
See that was my thought. I remember back in the GB days i always seemed to get more battery out of the Samsung lite ROMs than i did with CM7 etc.
I have a 2000Mah Battery and I'm only really seeing 1 day 14 hours on AOSP with 5 hours screen time.
On GB, i would have around 2 days, maybe a little more with the same screen time.
ram3n said:
Here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=25243106&postcount=528
What do you think matey?
Sent via my s2 monster
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your results look interesting. Im tempted to flash a Stock ROM (Wanam Lite) most probably and try that with NEAK Kernel, or Abyss (Never tried Abyss)
Battery 69% with 13h of use. Resurrection v1.5 with stock kernel. Awesome!!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Going to try Wanamlite.
Will strip more crap out of it as 235mb is still alot!
Will most probably add NEAK Kernel with Lulzctive tweaks and see what happens!
I still think stock ROM is better for battery life, for some reason!
At least with Vertumus' new theme its more or less similar looking
superleeds27 said:
Going to try Wanamlite.
Will strip more crap out of it as 235mb is still alot!
Will most probably add NEAK Kernel with Lulzctive tweaks and see what happens!
I still think stock ROM is better for battery life, for some reason!
At least with Vertumus' new theme its more or less similar looking
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can go ahead sir.
I'm interested in how well you can perform with new neak kernel.
Sent via my s2 monster
I do believe its true though.
I'd love to see some 'proper' results though. Wonder why Stock Roms perform better battery wise than AOSP.
superleeds27 said:
I do believe its true though.
I'd love to see some 'proper' results though. Wonder why Stock Roms perform better battery wise than AOSP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't know why but I'm still a believer.
Well, now it's time fore to eat some maxi pizza mate.
See ya
Sent via my s2 monster
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Airplane Mode was ou only at night... From 23h to 7h
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
---------- Post added at 09:22 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:34 AM ----------
With N.E.A.K. I was having some SoD. I dont know why... so i decided to use custom kernel of Resurection remix v1.5. With Thoravukk 2.30 and siyah 3.0rc6 the battery life was weak.
Getting excellent battery life with VK ROM and speedmod kernel. Amazing combination.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I was on stock, unrooted. Rarely on wifi since I have a mobile 3g plan. Use email and twitter often. Some surfing (rarely), play bit of games etc. I get 40+ hours out of it.
I just rooted, still stock (for now). Removed all the telco crap and am gonna freeze the useless stuff. Perhaps it will be better.
Only thing is i hate the Stock look, and even with vertumus theme its still not the same!
I hear good things about the LP9 Base.
Not sure whether to try Wanam's LP9 Or Dynamic Slim!
macho3215 said:
Getting excellent battery life with VK ROM and speedmod kernel. Amazing combination.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I love SpeedMod kernel. I've been using it with Foxhound ROMs (GB and now ICS) for a while. It just gives great battery life, and I've had no issues with it at all.
i get good batt life an iam on stock 2.3.5 gb but i was neva satisfied wiv custum roms life..but every phone is diff an depends on how u use it,may b custum or stock.....cheeerz
Combination of HYDR0G3NICS + Siyah 3.1rc6 gives me about 6-7 screen on time. Which is quite impressive. GPU + CPU UV. Tweaks. etc.

[Q] Battery Life with custom ROMs

Hi there,
i am new into this custom ROM stuff and i been trying few ROM and now i am on the UltimaROM 2.3.2
but Battery going down from 100 to 84 in short time
Which is the best to have more Battery
and is there anyway removing the default SMS app and use chompsms instead ?
Nothing is best here. Just keep experience yourself with different rom, kernel and tweaks to find the best battery performance for your phone.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Android System %34
Device Idle 20%
Cell Standby 18%
Screen 16%
is this figures normal ?
Arsaw said:
Nothing is best here. Just keep experience yourself with different rom, kernel and tweaks to find the best battery performance for your phone.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These things depend on how you use your phone, but system and idle seem high on your list. Screen and talking are my top two. Batteries have so many variables. I would try different ROMs and kernels.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
I am using the Stock Kernel but when i was installing the UltimaROM asked me which kernel do i want and had a list of kernels but where can i see what is the diff for each kernel ? i cant find such info ,
davis9491 said:
These things depend on how you use your phone, but system and idle seem high on your list. Screen and talking are my top two. Batteries have so many variables. I would try different ROMs and kernels.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cypriotxx said:
I am using the Stock Kernel but when i was installing the UltimaROM asked me which kernel do i want and had a list of kernels but where can i see what is the diff for each kernel ? i cant find such info ,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go to page one General and you will find stickys .
Alternative is to read the kernel posts in development section .
Or even that new fangled idea google search .
jje
I think stock kernal is probably your best bet for battery life...
Hi everyone!
1st post on xda, but I'm new in android world!
Anyway, I'm using Omega ROM v27.2 (JB)/stock kernel and I experienced some battery drain issues. After getting BBS, I didn't able to point out what was the cause.
After many readings, I found a possible solution: in advanced WiFi settings, they advised to disable "Keep WiFi on during sleep". By default it's set on "always". They advise to set it to "never" but I prefer set it to "only when plugged in". I think it's more logical!
I don't know yet if it's efficient but I'm trying this and I'll come back later to tell you.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
you could use phenomenal kernel for better battery life. it is better than stock kernel in terms of battery life but you need to check compatibility with the custom rom you choose
Foxhound Essential .2 with latest siyah kernel
Best Battery life I ever tried - I've used Foxhound, Criskelo, and Omega JB roms but the Foxhound Essential is the fastest, ram free (430mb), best battery life performance around (8hours extensive use with mobile date turned on). Try it its great! Thanks
---------- Post added at 12:49 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:44 AM ----------
sag35 said:
I think stock kernal is probably your best bet for battery life...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try latest siyah kernel - plus Foxhound Essential ver .2 - No bloatware and best battery life performance..
I flashed Phenomenal Extreme kernel yesterday but to test it properly I have to wait for Monday when I'll be at work.
I'm not a fanatic of battery life, I just want to find the right mix between performance & battery life. For now, I found the phenom extreme not enough smooth, I'll probably change it for the medium one in few days.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
cypriotxx said:
Android System %34
Device Idle 20%
Cell Standby 18%
Screen 16%
is this figures normal ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Get betterbatterystats and check the wake locks! The default battery stats from our phone can't allow us to deduce whether there is an issue
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Coop_fr said:
I flashed Phenomenal Extreme kernel yesterday but to test it properly I have to wait for Monday when I'll be at work.
I'm not a fanatic of battery life, I just want to find the right mix between performance & battery life. For now, I found the phenom extreme not enough smooth, I'll probably change it for the medium one in few days.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My best results with battery life has been with Phenomenal Extreme and VikingROM. I got about 6 hours screentime with wifi, sync, and lots of gaming. Though i think you can make almost any rom or kernel last about 5-6 hours screentime if you check your running processes and apps running in the backround.
I hv tried lots of roms
Psycho rom XXDLJ1 v 0.0.1 is one of the best
it gives u maximum performance and an amazing battary life
Though you can flash different ROMS and kernels to experiment with battery performance, most reputable ROMS like AOKP or CM10 Wong yield much difference. Too many other variables. I've heard Trinity kernel is a good one, but I just got an extended battery. I found it to be the most sure way of extending battery life.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
I've tried omega Rom and phenomenal kernel but these didn't really give me any more battery.
I found the stock kernel and Rom gave me the best battery performance at around 10 hours with WiFi on and surfing internet and maybe a quick go of a game or two.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Android System %29
Device Idle 16%
Cell Standby 14%
Screen 36%
is this statics normal ?
Yes, perfectly normal.
cypriotxx said:
I am using the Stock Kernel but when i was installing the UltimaROM asked me which kernel do i want and had a list of kernels but where can i see what is the diff for each kernel ? i cant find such info ,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i can assure you insertcoin ROM and Siyah kernel will give you the best battery life.
amadeus_l said:
i can assure you insertcoin ROM and Siyah kernel will give you the best battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Replies like this^^^ are the reason "best"threads aren't allowed, nice try lads.....but.......©®™

Best rom

I know it would be a toss up to which one is better cause its a personal opinion but I just got my DNA yesterday and I wanna know which rom is best for battery saving that's my main focus on it. I know there is users out there that can chime in and help me cause I don't wanna keep flashing Roms
Try hatka Rom I get great battery life about 10-12 hrs a day with average use
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
sirrdeezy said:
I know it would be a toss up to which one is better cause its a personal opinion but I just got my DNA yesterday and I wanna know which rom is best for battery saving that's my main focus on it. I know there is users out there that can chime in and help me cause I don't wanna keep flashing Roms
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery Plus is my favorite ROM, fast, responsive and have yet to have any issues. average of 10 hours of battery life
currently on the hatka Rom (just flashed yesterday) so i can vouch for it being really nice and battery efficient. plus i love the transparent pulldown and app drawer on it.
Viper DNA just dropped today. I was on the beta testing team and not only is the ROM incredible, but I was getting improved battery life on it as compared to stock and UKB.
If u like a customizable Rom and tweaks and a lot of other things viper rom is the one for u. Me I'm on it I too was apart of the beta team and I will say viper is the sheit :thumbup:
sent from my beastly powered viperDNA using Tapatalk 2

Best Battery Friendly Custom Rom

Hey guys what is the best battery friendly custom rom. just wondering. newbie here. since we can flash the roms built for the international HTC One.
Try them for yourself.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Iv had good battery with the tripNdroid rom but there a few small thing i dont like about the rom so i am back to ice cold just my 2 cents.
Test test and test some more see what works best for you
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Viper is amazing compared to pre-root. 75% more for me. Lots of variables though.
Sent from my HTC One using xda app-developers app
spk99 said:
Viper is amazing compared to pre-root. 75% more for me. Lots of variables though.
Sent from my HTC One using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your battery life increased by 75%?!?! 0_o
Sent from my HTC One running CM 10.1
killman2659 said:
Your battery life increased by 75%?!?! 0_o
Sent from my HTC One running CM 10.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hear ya.... Per GSam averaged 20ish hours per charge now 36ish...
Sent from my HTC One using xda app-developers app
rahtrip said:
Hey guys what is the best battery friendly custom rom. just wondering. newbie here. since we can flash the roms built for the international HTC One.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery life on ROMs is a tough variable. Having hung around these forums for a really long time I can tell you that you will see huge swings in reeactions to battery life, often on the same ROM. There are so many things that can influence battery life that it really is a YMMV thing. you might be able to get some general trends from reading ROM threads, but there is no such thing as "gospel truth". some genral thoughts
1. Push email and facebook chew through battery
2. The accepted consensus is that battery saver prgrams like juice defender can eat as much battery ormore than they save but if you have a specific use case they may work.
3. you can spend your whole day chasing wakelocks...
All ROMs generally have about the same battery life. Battery is all about how you use your phone and how you manage what is running in the background.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 2
Obviously everyone's mileage will vary, but of every ROM I've tried I've seen the best battery out of the Sentinel sense based ROM over in the international one development section. Yes it and basically every other ROM over there is compatible with the att variant
Sent from my HTC One using xda app-developers app
I have tried Sense 5.0, the Google Play Edition ROM and two CM nightly, the most recent one being July 5.
Both the GE and CM handily beat the stock Sense ROM in battery life (at least that was my perception).
CM 10.1 seemed to be a bit better than the Google Edition ROM (it also seems to be significantly more efficient in its use of resources which translates into better battery life), but there are still some issues with CM...NFC, Bluetooth, no Beats Audio Drivers, and I like the new Jelly Bean Camera App better so I am sticking with the GE ROM for the time being.
I love CM though and will probably go back to it once everything gets ironed out...
OK so I too have been questioning battery life. CM 11 did... OK. My previous phone was the Moto G, and comparatively my One has been doing terrible on battery life! I'm currently on Pacrom, tried PA and a couple similar as well, getting 9 hr battery life, 2 hr on (like what the f***!) according to GSam. I'm thinking about stock gpe and playing with kernels? Thoughts? Testing has been taking a while as I try to give every rom kernel combo 3 days at least, a week preferred.
the_odom_project said:
OK so I too have been questioning battery life. CM 11 did... OK. My previous phone was the Moto G, and comparatively my One has been doing terrible on battery life! I'm currently on Pacrom, tried PA and a couple similar as well, getting 9 hr battery life, 2 hr on (like what the f***!) according to GSam. I'm thinking about stock gpe and playing with kernels? Thoughts? Testing has been taking a while as I try to give every rom kernel combo 3 days at least, a week preferred.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A some what general consensus of Battery life for the One:
Sense > Google Edition > AOSP
In my opinion the best battery life will come from a fairly close to stock sense Rom such as MaximusHD with poondog's Kangaroo Kernel.
Sent from my HTC One using XDA Free mobile app

What ROM do you run?

Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
CrDroid with crpalmer's kernel. Blazing fast with awesome battery life
Sent from my crDroid DNA
I've been switching back and forth between NOS's GPE and a few different aosp Roms (running Vanir ATM). The customization of aosp Roms is awesome, but the performance and screen-on time just isn't up to par with sense based Roms so I go back and forth a lot. Too bad we can't have the best of both worlds, but GPE+xposed modules is about as close as it gets.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4
_phoey said:
CrDroid with crpalmer's kernel. Blazing fast with awesome battery life
Sent from my crDroid DNA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Me too... specifically the 9/23 build because the active display works perfectly with crpalmers 4.4.15 great combo with 3-3.5 hours of screen time
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium
CM 10.2 /w crpalmer Kernel
Carbon has been my daily driver until just recently as pio isn't actively developing it anymore. Hopefully he will come back to it when the time is right, but in the meantime I've been bouncing around all over between Sense and AOSP...flashed Viper 2.0 and ran it all day yesterday and it's pretty close to the customization I was used to with Carbon and PAC, and it was nice to have full speaker volume for a change. But right now I'm flashing crDroid and will probably spend a little time playing with Beanstalk today too.
When picking a ROM, my main concern is whether or not it will still be supported a week from now. With a lot of the AOSP roms for the DNA, it looks like each developer is building and supporting three or four roms, and in some cases stop building/supporting an older rom when they have three or four new ones to compile.
Because of this I stick to CM (or really any other rom with a full team behind it who releases regular builds).
I just switched back to AOSP from ViperDNA and had a good run with that.
shobon said:
When picking a ROM, my main concern is whether or not it will still be supported a week from now. With a lot of the AOSP roms for the DNA, it looks like each developer is building and supporting three or four roms, and in some cases stop building/supporting an older rom when they have three or four new ones to compile.
Because of this I stick to CM (or really any other rom with a full team behind it who releases regular builds).
I just switched back to AOSP from ViperDNA and had a good run with that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None of the roms which i build has been abandoned. If they have been abandoned its due to the fact that their main team has stopped developing like jellybeer, uXylon etc.
Tapatalked from TF300T - PA
LuckyPuppy said:
Me too... specifically the 9/23 build because the active display works perfectly with crpalmers 4.4.15 great combo with 3-3.5 hours of screen time
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow didn't realize there was Active Display for the DNA...is crdroid that only rom that offers it?
detonation said:
Wow didn't realize there was Active Display for the DNA...is crdroid that only rom that offers it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No... but it works best for me.... Amit has done a great job with this one :thumbup:
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium
Viper DNA sense 5. Won't be much longer since I have an HTC One coming in.
Sent from my dlx using xda app-developers app
jamiethemorris said:
GPE+xposed modules is about as close as it gets.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the tip. I've been using Carbon for months but the low speaker volume of CM-based roms started to bug me. Now I'm using GPE + xposed.
...
I'm on stock still, ya I know. Anyway, what is active display?
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
amit_sen said:
None of the roms which i build has been abandoned. If they have been abandoned its due to the fact that their main team has stopped developing like jellybeer, uXylon etc.
Tapatalked from TF300T - PA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh I wasn't referring to anyone in particular! I've just had a bad history on other devices of independent devs losing interest over time. I'm actually on Gummy right now and thoroughly enjoying it. I just tend to stick to "official" roms since they get updated daily, lol.
Now I flashed the 4.3.1 [ROM][4.3.1][16-Oct]**crDroid AOSP**|CM10.2|HALO 2.0|SLIMPIE|APPBAR and it's simply the best I tried so far... Awesome battery life, and perfect customization options!
GPE + xposed
orangechoochoo said:
Thanks for the tip. I've been using Carbon for months but the low speaker volume of CM-based roms started to bug me. Now I'm using GPE + xposed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you elaborating on GPE + xposed...I love the carbon rom and would love to increase the volume and I am getting frustrated.
I know AOSP roms have bugs. But why is it that I cannot use my voip apps on my phone whenever I have anything AOSP on it?? Is there something I'm missing?? Like changing settings somewhere?? My main complain with AOSP are the constant crashes, and that it renders my voip apps useless. Also, in my experience battery life was poor in AOSP and most of the feature rich sense based roms. I'm currently running DNA-Super-Digital rom on my phone. It's not fancy but at least it is very stable and offers a good battery life. I wish there were more stable roms with good battery life like it.
rajamania said:
Do you elaborating on GPE + xposed...I love the carbon rom and would love to increase the volume and I am getting frustrated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xposed frameworks basically lets you modify apk's on the fly as if the functionality was built into the ROM, I think that's the best way to explain it. Right now I'm using xposed framework with gravitybox (various mods similar to what you find in aosp Roms), xblast tools (same type of thing), xposed statusbar mods (self-explanatory), xposed app settings (per-app DPI/permissions), and xtheme engine (let's you use cm10 themes, although they have to be pre-modified to work with xtheme). Here is the thread for xposed http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1574401 installation instructions are in the thread, and all of the modules I mentioned are available through the app.
Sent from my Droid DNA using Tapatalk Pro
rajamania said:
Do you elaborating on GPE + xposed...I love the carbon rom and would love to increase the volume and I am getting frustrated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jammiethemorris answered the question about xposed framework. Regarding the volume, xposed framework doesn't fix that. All CM-based roms have low speaker volume because the amplifier is not working correctly. So I switched to the GE rom which is Sense-based and therefore doesn't have the low volume problem. The GE rom looks very much like AOSP but doesn't have options to tweak it, hence the need for xposed framework which allows you to tweak he look and feel of the rom.

Categories

Resources