Dear all,
I am absolutely looking for a cable headphone remote control for my Blackstone. The E100 headset does not work and I do not want to use a bluetooth headset as I want to avoid as much radiation as possible.
Do you know a compatible headset with remote control for the music player?
Thanks!
What you are looking for doesn't exist, and you could have really searched this forum before asking this question.
And you are kidding about the radiation thing, aren't you?
vangrieg said:
What you are looking for doesn't exist, and you could have really searched this forum before asking this question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, does anyone know, if HTC is going to release something like that?
vangrieg said:
And you are kidding about the radiation thing, aren't you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Certainly I'm not. The Federal Ministry of Health have published a paper in collaboration with some universities, showing that the daily radiation that we are exposed to, provokes health damages. Well, I think, that's nothing suprising - and we are exposed to radiation all day - so, in my opinion, we should reduce it as much as possible.
That's why I am really angry that there is no such thing as a cable remote control, as it exists (E100) but not usable with the expensive Touch HD. So where's the problem? Why not making it compatible with the Touch HD? I do not see any reason.
The problem is lack of audio in the extUSB jack. It's all going to a much easier marketed 3.5 one.
lamajstro said:
Certainly I'm not. The Federal Ministry of Health have published a paper in collaboration with some universities, showing that the daily radiation that we are exposed to, provokes health damages. Well, I think, that's nothing suprising - and we are exposed to radiation all day - so, in my opinion, we should reduce it as much as possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't want to start a flame war, but just by carrying a phone you're exposing yourself to several times more radiation than a bluetooth headset could possibly emit. Here's a quick article on BusinessWeek:
But because it's a good idea to err on the side of caution in such matters, regulatory bodies have set exposure standards. These are expressed in terms of the "specific absorption rate" (SAR), which attempts to measure the radiation actually reaching body tissue. The U.S. and Canadian governments have set a maximum SAR of 1.6 watts per kilogram, while the European Union permits a slightly higher level.
"INSIGNIFICANT BY COMPARISON." In the real world, emissions generally stay well below the maximum allowed. According to data from BlackBerry-maker Research in Motion (RIMM ), SARs for GSM BlackBerry devices (those sold by Cingular and T-Mobile in the U.S.) fall in the range of 0.25 watts per kilogram when used at your ear.
Bluetooth radios operate at much lower power levels than phones so, not surprisingly, the radiation added by a Bluetooth headset is insignificant by comparison. A study by William G. Scanlon of Queen's University in Belfast found that a typical Ericsson (ERICY ) Bluetooth radio module generates an SAR of just 0.001 watts per kilogram.
So, if you're worried about the health impact of radio waves, remember that the phone itself is a much greater source of concern than a Bluetooth headset. That's especially true because, when you're using Bluetooth, the BlackBerry is likely positioned much farther from your body -- and especially your brain -- than when holding the phone up to your ear.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are bluetooth units with available that hang around your neck and into which you plug your headphones, like this Jabra unit. This would mean that the only radiation is at your chest and not next to your brain. Perhaps that might be a solution?
SiliconS said:
I don't want to start a flame war, but just by carrying a phone you're exposing yourself to several times more radiation than a bluetooth headset could possibly emit. Here's a quick article on BusinessWeek:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem, thanks for the link. Well, I'm aware of that and I know that we are exposed to radiation even if I go by train. But: You do not have to expose yourself to even more radiation if it is not really necessary and not making it possible to use the E100 cable rc is not necessary!
SiliconS said:
There are bluetooth units with available that hang around your neck and into which you plug your headphones, like this Jabra unit. This would mean that the only radiation is at your chest and not next to your brain. Perhaps that might be a solution?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I've seen this one. But same problem. I really would prefer a cable rc.
I thought, perhaps it is just a software issue, that the sound is sent to the 3,5mm jack...
regardless of radiation that and wifi this and stardust that
the only thing certain in life that needs no amount of academia to prove or disprove is.......
once you hit 25 you are dying and its a non stop slide into oblivion
ooo ps:
here in the UK a little while back, some academic scare mongering types published a paper that "proved" wired headsets INCREASED the exposure to the radiation our fones emit
then again, its academia that have set up a (broken) experiment under the alps that with either do nothing or create a black hole ending the world and its surrounds
go figure?!?!
the outcome of such research, changes and contradicts itself so frequently (and depending on who is actually funding it) that all bar what is common sense (eat well, dont do "poisons" (drink and drugs) exercise etc), is pretty worthless
ive been such a researcher so i know most of its twaddle, ive generated some of it!
Related
Has any any body tried if the wireless motorola headphones that ship with motorRoKR are compatible with hermes?I mean if they produce good sound these might be the best wireless headphones in the market...
i think they are stereo and produce good sound...Need ur suggestions guys...
If these are the ones you're on about:
http://direct.motorola.com/hellomoto/S9/?WT.mc_id=globalpr_s9
... I use them with my O2 XDA Trion [WM6], which is another version of the Hermes, and they are amazing. Amazingly lightweight, great sound, no wires and easily accessible buttons to play/pause/skip ahead/skip back/volume up/volume down and phone. Couple that with an 8Gb MicroSDHC card and its amazing.
I disagree. These headphones were garbage for me. They were very tight and wearing them for more than a few minutes caused headaches from the pressure they caused on my head. The real problem was reception though, as even turning my head in the wrong way could cause them to lose signal and stop the music, even when my hermes was just sitting on my belt. Considering how much they cost, you may want to purchase them from a place with a generous return policy in case you have the same issues as I did.
Has anyone found a good fm transmitter for G1 yet?
I've seen few on ebay, not sure if they are any good, one of them called FMTalk.
Thanks,
Dmitry
yeah the ones on ebay actually work great, it was $20 on ebay included shipping and i cant complain. you have to turn the volume down on your g1 handset and turn up your volume on what ever your playing your music through. i also love the fact it has a bulit-in mic. i use it as a hands free unit too. its worth spending $20 and much better than griffin transmitters for the iphone/ipod.
lilwill2806 said:
yeah the ones on ebay actually work great, it was $20 on ebay included shipping and i cant complain. you have to turn the volume down on your g1 handset and turn up your volume on what ever your playing your music through. i also love the fact it has a bulit-in mic. i use it as a hands free unit too. its worth spending $20 and much better than griffin transmitters for the iphone/ipod.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great, thanks for the info, just ordered one.
no problem !
can you guys provide the link or item number for this item on ebay?
thanks
blufabric said:
can you guys provide the link or item number for this item on ebay?
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=260356034462
This is the one I ordered, it just shipped out, hopefully it will be good when I get it (wrong item pic on the auction)
thanks, let me know how it goes..
tchort said:
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=260356034462
This is the one I ordered, it just shipped out, hopefully it will be good when I get it (wrong item pic on the auction)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I ordered the one in the pic and it was total crap. It would transmit but the sound quality was bad and it was full of static.
I just got mine, took about 5 minutes to find the right frequency so far seems like it's actually working really well, will test it out over next few days and write a quick update here.
Any more word on these? I want one but don't want to waste my time.
You can always just use an extUSB to 3.5mm headphone jack converter and then plug that into a generic fm transmitter.
Try this one.
http://www.designtech-intl.com/fm.asp
http://shop.ebay.com/items/?_nkw=fm..._trksid=m270.l1313&_odkw=fm+voyager&_osacat=0
I was personally involved in the design of the audio section of the FM Voyager before Directed Electronics purchased it from the company I formerly worked for.
In particular, I designed the bandpass circuitry that normalizes the frequency response. Most FM transmitters have no such circuitry - and so their end frequency response is nothing like a normal radio station. During developement this unit was compared to literally dozens of other transmitters, some costing upwards of 100 dollars. While this unit - like everything on the market - had its share of reductions/limitations in order to meet cost and engineering goals, the final result was a product that sounds better (in my opinion) than virtually anything else on the market - including the transmitters that cost many many times as much.
As a side note: Some FM transmitters are *NOT* FCC legal. The 12 channel version of the FM Voyager is. The result of being FCC legal is that the power output is limited - and that power can result in some (usually minor) static being received depending on the surrounding environment such as other transmitters and receiver design. In addition, you of course have slightly less channels to choose from, although this is not normally a major issue. While technically innaccurate, the basic thought for lack of better explination is that some receivers have such a low sensitivity that a legally operating portable transmitter may not provide a strong enough signal to eliminate static. The downside of not being FCC legal is primarily that the device could transmitt farther than intended - and it could effect other receivers/stations as a result. There is an older 14 channel version of the FM Voyager, but thats all I am going to say about it.
Call me biased, but its the transmitter I use exclusively and I am very happy with it.
DISCLAIMER: I do not, and never have worked for Directed Electronics. The information from this post is based on first hand knowledge acquired during employement at the company that was originally responsible for the dwevelopement of the FM Voyager. Its possible the design has changed and as such it is possible that nothing in this post is meaningful or accurate at this time.
Kieth
mightykc said:
I ordered the one in the pic and it was total crap. It would transmit but the sound quality was bad and it was full of static.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine was the same. Unuseable.
myron bennell said:
Any more word on these? I want one but don't want to waste my time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've used it for few weeks now, there is some static for sure, finding a clear channel is a bit of a pain, and station that works today, tomorrow might have more static. Also another negative is car charger plugs into the transmitter, but does not charge the phone.
tchort said:
Also another negative is car charger plugs into the transmitter, but does not charge the phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the biggest negtaive.
Henchman said:
That's the biggest negtaive.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. that was one reason i wanted to try these out. The phone only goes so far on a charge as it is.
Hey guys! I had a pair of beats tours, but I blew the speaker today (twice now) so I am looking for something new.
Does anyone have any recommendations for a pair of in ear bluetooth headphones?
Something that can be very loud with a decent (~6 hours streaming) battery life?
I know I don't want the LG ones with the 'necklace', way to ridiculous for me lol.
Price is not an issue.
Thanks!
Get a small Bluetooth receiver and then pick your own IEMs IMO, way better bang for your buck... Unless you're completely against the notion of slipping a matchbook sized receiver in your pocket or clipping it somewhere. This Sony receiver actually comes with some headphones (can't speak to their quality) but you could use any pair of headphones, it has built in controls and a display even. Proprietary charging cable I think but that's par for the course with Sony.
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Ericsson-Bluetooth-Stereo-Headset/dp/B003DQ1DCM/ref=pd_cp_cps_pw_1
I got this more basic receiver for other uses but I've used it with my Senheisser CX300, JVC 'mallows, and MEElec M9P headphones without issue, main drawback is no mic or controls, little cheaper tho and it probably has better range:
http://www.amazon.com/Miccus-BluBridge-mini-jack-Rx-Bluetooth/dp/B0038MA11U
These are THE smallest BT headphones I've seen, not worth the extra $20 if you ask me tho:
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Ericsson-HBH-IS800-Wireless-Headphone/dp/B001QTW21Y/ref=pd_sim_cps5
Battery life on those is obviously worse, tho it might be sufficient for you. I can't remember what other drawbacks I noted tho (they've been around a few years, used to cost $200), besides the fact that you're tied to the integrated headphones forever, and they're probably $20-30 quality headphones (which isn't bad per se, just depends on your needs and budget). Controlling playback is also probably fussier, if at all possible.
No one makes very high end BT headphones because you do lose some quality due to the compression BT uses, tho it's fine for mobile and car use IMO... But I'm not an audiophile and I don't pay more than $70 for a pair of headphon, and lately not even half that. Home cans are JCV RX700, cost $30, you'd be amazed at what you can get with a small budget if you just do some research (Head-Fi.org).
Thanks for your input, I really appreciate it. I was thinking more so the ones that are connected with the 1ft ish cord connecting it, but didn't even consider that option. I'll check them out, thanks again.
Edited the post with some extra comments, not quite sure what type of !BT headphone you're alluding too tho. Most of the others I've seen either have a behind the head band or they're over the ear and bulkier.
I've seen a couple other IEMs that are just tethered by one short cord (Jaybirds?) but they're still bulkier than those last Sony I linked, and probably not much cheaper... Might as well go with the sleekest possible if you wanna go that route, I'm not a Sony fan by any means but I doubt similar sets from companies that don't make any other audio gear (besides BT stuff and phone accesories) are gonna sound any better. My 2c
Impulses said:
Edited the post with some extra comments, not quite sure what type of !BT headphone you're alluding too tho. Most of the others I've seen either have a behind the head band or they're over the ear and bulkier.
I've seen a couple other IEMs that are just tethered by one short cord (Jaybirds?) but they're still bulkier than those last Sony I linked, and probably not much cheaper... Might as well go with the sleekest possible if you wanna go that route, I'm not a Sony fan by any means but I doubt similar sets from companies that don't make any other audio gear (besides BT stuff and phone accesories) are gonna sound any better. My 2c
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was talking about something similar to these
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B005B28DOM/ref=aw_d_iv_wireless?is=l&qid=1318655745&sr=8-16
But really looking for options, opinions, reviews.
I'll check out the website you posted, thanks.
Also, the BT receiver defeats the purpose of having a BT headset for me because 100% of the time the phone will be in my pocket anyways lol.
Hmm, whatever you linked isn't showing up on my Transformer... Point of the receiver is you can take the phone out and whatever without wrangling or dangling the cord, those receivers are tiny enough for a shirt pocket even... But if compact is what you want I haven't really seen anything smaller than those Sony I linked (last link). The whole BT/battery module is a tiny capsule mid string, most other BT IEMs I've seen are bulkier on the ear components.
Impulses said:
Hmm, whatever you linked isn't showing up on my Transformer... Point of the receiver is you can take the phone out and whatever without wrangling or dangling the cord, those receivers are tiny enough for a shirt pocket even... But if compact is what you want I haven't really seen anything smaller than those Sony I linked (last link). The whole BT/battery module is a tiny capsule mid string, most other BT IEMs I've seen are bulkier on the ear components.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I understand why you like the receiver, it just doesn't do anything for me.
I do like the ones in the last link, similar to the ones I linked, but was asking for reviews. They would be well worth the extra $20 in my book, if they work well.
Check out jabra sport.
Hi,
I want to buy an Atrix but have concerns about SAR rates. I may buy the Atrix or the 4g one but I have a question about it.
Under UMTS I 2100 frequency, is there a difference between SAR values of Atrix and the 4g Atrix?
Also, may I find a chart like the one attached?
Thanks in advance...
I don't know about that... It seems like the SAR value are not so popular anymore - people and manufacturers don't really seem to care about them anymore.
In any case, here's one point... You get irradiated even without using a mobile phone, because wireless networks are basically everywhere around us... One extra bit of a radiation punch in your body (from your phone) isn't really gonna hurt. But that's just me...
I honestly feel that the SAR are completely irrelevant. I'll put it this way, the sun is orders of magnitude more dangerous than your cell phone. quick physics explanations, electromagnetic waves as most know range from radio to gamma waves. These waves are not continuous like most believe instead comprised of individual photons. The power rating for radio is essentially the energy of the photons times the number of photons. So quick example say some source of radio waves produces 4 photons a sec each with one joule. The power output would be 4watts in that case. Lets also say a source of visible light produces one photon per second that has 4 joules of power. This would also be rated at 4 watts.
So think of it this way lets say you get hit with 100 foam dodge balls. it might hard but the force is distributed so it's not that bad. Now lets say you get hit with a bullet which has the same force as the 100 dodge balls. But how which one will you die from the bullet or 100 foam dodge balls.
This is analogous to the radio ways produced by your phone. it is essentially impossible for radio waves to cause damage to your body. Visible light form the sun is orders of magnitude stronger than anything your cell phone or a radio tower could produce
jonnyboyC13 said:
I honestly feel that the SAR are completely irrelevant. I'll put it this way, the sun is orders of magnitude more dangerous than your cell phone. quick physics explanations, electromagnetic waves as most know range from radio to gamma waves. These waves are not continuous like most believe instead comprised of individual photons. The power rating for radio is essentially the energy of the photons times the number of photons. So quick example say some source of radio waves produces 4 photons a sec each with one joule. The power output would be 4watts in that case. Lets also say a source of visible light produces one photon per second that has 4 joules of power. This would also be rated at 4 watts.
So think of it this way lets say you get hit with 100 foam dodge balls. it might hard but the force is distributed so it's not that bad. Now lets say you get hit with a bullet which has the same force as the 100 dodge balls. But how which one will you die from the bullet or 100 foam dodge balls.
This is analogous to the radio ways produced by your phone. it is essentially impossible for radio waves to cause damage to your body. Visible light form the sun is orders of magnitude stronger than anything your cell phone or a radio tower could produce
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It makes sense, but... why is there so much fuss regarding this? I mean, if it is that simple... why do scientists still argue on this? Either for the media, either they're not actually scientists, either... well, it's not that simple... right?
Seriously, if you are not using your phone in low reception location. There is nothing to worry about.
Formhault said:
It makes sense, but... why is there so much fuss regarding this? I mean, if it is that simple... why do scientists still argue on this? Either for the media, either they're not actually scientists, either... well, it's not that simple... right
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My opinion? Fear-mongering, ignorance of science, and the media's constant hunger to feed its 24/7 news cycle. Combine that with a tendency to distort, overstate, or understate the facts (gotta sensationalize in order to draw in the idiot viewers), and you end up with mass confusion and unwarranted panic over the issues, particularly issues where science is involved.
windozeanti said:
Seriously, if you are not using your phone in low reception location. There is nothing to worry about.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When the signal is low, the phone is going to do anything just to sip some network, even kill you with radiation, lol.
Sent from my Neutrino-loaded ATRIX
Hello Android Radio friends,
I have thought a lot about how to solve the problem of overheating Android devices with PX5 and PX6 processors. Next summer will come for sure.
My specially designed passive heat sinks are probably known by some people.
This time, I'm going to focus on active cooling + heatsink.
It was important that as many people as possible can use this method. It should be as easy as possible to install, even by people who have no manual skills.
Therefore I created 3D models of different top covers which you can easily print out if you have a 3D printer.
In this lid there are already the drillings for mounting a fan. I make the whole project available for the community on Thingiverse. I also add number 1 - 22 to each 3D model. If someone doesn't find the 3D model for his own top cover. Tell me the dimensions. I will create the 3d model. Let's make a collection of compatible devices.
Because high temperatures can occur in a car in summer, I used ABS as material. This can withstand temperatures up to 100°C.
Of course you could also drill a big hole in the top cover. But it does not look so nice. ?
If someone doesn't have a 3D printer. There are many different websites that offer 3D printing at low prices.
In the video I also show some used fans and some methods of power supply.
German video on YouTube
https://youtu.be/U36MYCj7FfY
English video on Youtube
https://youtu.be/U36MYCj7FfY
The whole project on Thingiverse
https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4240690
What do you think of this project?
Alex
Update 10.07.2020
Meanwhile there are 22 different 3D models.
Nice ideas.
Had some thoughts about that first minute I unpacked radio upgrade for my car, PX6 unit. It has some perforations on the back but it is all closed underneath with plastic so I think almost no air circulation happens there. Yeah it is 2DIN with aluminium heatsink on the back, and yes in my car ventilation is right above it but - I don't like it. Maybe some holes could help.
I'm writing this because of an experience with completely different thing, had annoying fan noise on an instrument amplifier, which was at 100% all the time. No matter how it was used or maybe unused at the time, noise was unbearable. Manual control is too dangerous because I know sooner or later I would forget to turn it up when needed, but it can be automatic so quick and nice fix was temperature control board: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/32886053224.html . I think it could work nice for projects like yours :good:
Is the fan mod really useful?
Does anyone else use a fan in his HU?
iMattmax said:
Is the fan mod really useful?
Does anyone else use a fan in his HU?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
simply useless. If you switch stock thermal pad with a better quality one and install a good heatsink all is done. I did it one year ago and nothing more is necessary.
Consider that PX5 is a 5W SoC so a passive cooling is more than sufficient to remove heat
giouncino said:
simply useless. If you switch stock thermal pad with a better quality one and install a good heatsink all is done. I did it one year ago and nothing more is necessary.
Consider that PX5 is a 5W SoC so a passive cooling is more than sufficient to remove heat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Definitely not useless. Did you see the temperatures in combination with a heatsink?
A fan in the top cover cooling down the whole device.
Ati_gangster said:
Definitely not useless. Did you see the temperatures in combination with a heatsink?
A fan in the top cover cooling down the whole device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I performed a torture test and SoC temperature during this test was between 70-80°C (never reached during normal use). So as I stated before: a 5W SoC can easily be cooled passively. If you want to increase noise, failure probability of the fan and dust inside the radio, you can but it's not necessary at all. I have experience in cooling CPUs (also with massive overclock) for decades, this is not my first experience.
Moreover my radio is working passively since last year and I've nevere experienced stuttering or problems due to heat.
Other parts of the radio are not hot at all.
Awesome job Alex, and great video. Comprehensive tests too. Thanks so much for your hard work
giouncino said:
Yes, I performed a torture test and SoC temperature during this test was between 70-80°C (never reached during normal use). So as I stated before: a 5W SoC can easily be cooled passively. If you want to increase noise, failure probability of the fan and dust inside the radio, you can but it's not necessary at all. I have experience in cooling CPUs (also with massive overclock) for decades, this is not my first experience.
Moreover my radio is working passively since last year and I've nevere experienced stuttering or problems due to heat.
Other parts of the radio are not hot at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
70 to 80°C under which conditions?
What outside temperature?
Device 1Din or 2Din?
Cover open or closed?
Air conditioning on?
The advantage of active cooling is that not only the CPU is cooled, but also all other components such as voltage regulators, capacitors, amplifier chip and other microchips.
And if the 5€ fan should break after years, it's still better than if a 300€+ device breaks down.
Ati_gangster said:
70 to 80°C under which conditions?
What outside temperature?
Device 1Din or 2Din?
Cover open or closed?
Air conditioning on?
The advantage of active cooling is that not only the CPU is cooled, but also all other components such as voltage regulators, capacitors, amplifier chip and other microchips.
And if the 5€ fan should break after years, it's still better than if a 300€+ device breaks down.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tested a lot with and without heat sink and fan, same as you did.
By the way... Thanks a lot for providing the 3-D-images to print the top cover. :highfive:
I printed the top cover for my head units to be used with a 80mm "be quiet" fan, which is really not audible if the unit is mounted in the dash board. Even on bench test the fan is really quiet.
The CPU temperature of all my 2-DIN units got down from (in Throttling Test) ~95°C down to max 48°C. Throttling was a real an issue. Up to 55% throttling without cooling down.
With normal usage (navigation with active route guidance, some Tasker tasks in background working, audio decoding active) the CPU is cooled down from nearly 80°C to ~30°C at ~25°C outside temperature, which is much more comfortable for all the parts in the unit and resolved the throttling issues to less than 5-10%, dependent of the unit.
Tested on:
PX5 (RK3368)
CSN2 (RK3368) ...which was delivered with a complete closed top cover. I got temperatures without any running apps of something about 85°C, because no ventilation was possible.
RL7A (RK3399)
SC9853i
Guys I’m in search for heatsink that fits my 1din PX6 unit. Do you have the measurements for the module size I need to cover with the heatsink?
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I added this to mine:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07RYK3J41/ref=dp_prsubs_1
the temps on my px5 swap were 90c which is way too hot for my liking, with this it never went above 60c and you cant hear any noise.
Hi, great job. Congratulations. Anyway, where to buy Alex's android fan kit from?
Geox70 said:
Hi, great job. Congratulations. Anyway, where to buy Alex's android fan kit from?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Directly from him. Search for his channel on YouTube, there is somewhere his WhatsApp number written. Just contact him over there and ask for fan kit.
Don't know if this is the right location to post this but I just purchased a Vanku px6 4/64 and had every intention of at least putting a heat sink on it and I was pleasantly surprised to find this.. and it was even secured with screws. Win win View attachment 5114453
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
View attachment 5114487
Sorry don't know why the picture isn't showing. It is a pretty robust heat sink.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
My solution is a low-noise 12v fan stuck on top of the heatsink with strong double-sided mounting tape. Works like a charm.
Attached is the picture I was trying to show earlier. This is the stock heatsink in the Vanku
Edit:
Sorry, I give up. I can't get the pic to show.
I simply put an old intel mobo southbridge chip heatsink on a px6, some of them are very large
It has very long fins (over 1 1/4 ") by chance i could mod it to put longer screws to hold the px6 in place with the added heat sink
Fully passive, never had any problems
I simply run my PX6 with no lid. Makes zero difference to induce RF noise etc and my temps are cut in half for free.
Kudos to Alex (Ati_gangster)!
Simply sent the width of the original cover and the position of the two side holes and the size of the favorite fan (not included in the scope of delivery) via WhatsApp and two days later I had my cover in the mailbox. The fit is great and my fan fits perfectly into the existing holes.
My fan:
https://www.amazon.de/dp/B08WHMP2CD/ref=cm_sw_r_apan_i_6X7857YXKXYD8QC9SYDB?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1
(trial assembly, still without fan)