Why Cronos Froyo is out of this forum?
It is the most stable and solid rom I tried on my Hero and I currently use this.
See the link below for more informations:
Linking to banned user's site is not permitted, per egzthunder1 and stericson's explanation posts
Yes its good, but Feeyo was banned from XDA-Developers.
Azure465 said:
Yes its good, but Feeyo was banned from XDA-Developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh! Naughty boy!
Too bad! The rom is very good. But rules are rules!
Thanks for your reply.
cestovuoro said:
Oh! Naughty boy!
Too bad! The rom is very good. But rules are rules!
Thanks for your reply.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pff you can discuss that ban...
Hey... I was wondering why he got banned, I was hanging round off topic when he got banned, and only when I came back I realised
i've to say, the best 2.1 rom came from feeyo, solid, fast and clean
still have to try 2.2 though...anyway, it's not much an effort to go on his own forum, it's easy to find on google
MacaronyMax said:
Hey... I was wondering why he got banned, I was hanging round off topic when he got banned, and only when I came back I realised
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is a loooooooooooooooooooooooong loooooooooooooooooooooooong story That would take me like an hour to fully explain...
If I am not mistaken the short version is something like:
If and when Feeyo makes his kernel sources public he can come back.
erasmux said:
If I am not mistaken the short version is something like:
If and when Feeyo makes his kernel sources public he can come back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah Okay
Thanks
The source in question was the 32 kernel if i recall correctly. As far as i know, feeyo does not even have his original source on that anymore, and feeyo has been making his other source available to anyone who asks.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
erasmux said:
If I am not mistaken the short version is something like:
If and when Feeyo makes his kernel sources public he can come back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As herandroid said he has made his sources public but he cannot come back since he made some accounts after he was banned I think.
C0mpu13rFr34k said:
As herandroid said he has made his sources public but he cannot come back since he made some accounts after he was banned I think.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where ?
erasmux said:
Where ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have minimal understanding of what you devs needs for sources but here? I think the kernel source is up to date but the name hasn't been changed but I'm not sure (it's the CK29- one). Is this correct?
C0mpu13rFr34k said:
I have minimal understanding of what you devs needs for sources but here? I think the kernel source is up to date but the name hasn't been changed but I'm not sure (it's the CK29- one). Is this correct?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What we "devs" call sources is: a group of files which when downloaded to a properly configured linux system, it is possible to build them and, get this, even run them on an actual hero device!
For example: https://github.com/erasmux/hero-2.6.29-flykernel
On my FlyKernel post you can find detailed instruction on how to build it, and if you have a linux system and are interested, you should be able to build my kernel with no problems.
EDIT: damn, again reading too fast. The CK29- one, does look like kernel sources, and I am sorry but don't have time now to download them and try and compile them. But did Feeyo really not update his kernel since august?
EDIT2: From the Cronos 1.6.0 release notes:
Release notes:
21 Nov 2010 | Cronos Froyo 1.6.0:
...
* New Kernel tweaks.
...
Where are these tweaks?
erasmux said:
What we "devs" call sources is: a group of files which when downloaded to a properly configured linux system, it is possible to build them and, get this, even run them on an actual hero device!
For example: https://github.com/erasmux/hero-2.6.29-flykernel
On my FlyKernel post you can find detailed instruction on how to build it, and if you have a linux system and are interested, you should be able to build my kernel with no problems.
On Feeyo's github, the only thing which seems like its sources for a kernel is this one:
https://github.com/Feeyo/cm-kernel-32A-Magic
These are obviously sources for a kernel for the Magic device and not the hero....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay then I guess I'll ask him...
Please see my edits above. I tend to read posts way to fast, I was sure I checked all the repositories on Feeyos github before posting my original one, but after I noticed you said its "CK29-", I rechecked it.....
erasmux said:
Release notes:
21 Nov 2010 | Cronos Froyo 1.6.0:
...
* New Kernel tweaks.
...
Where are these tweaks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those tweaks you can find in 30tweaks under init.d in one of his kernel flashable zip.
Yes the kernel has been updated and it has been updated A LOT. I'm guessing Feeyo probably hasn't bothered updating his kernel but I'll ask him about it
EDIT: He has been trying out some very experimental stuff like compiling with a new toolchain and he is also very busy ATM. I think he said he would compile a new kernel with the old toolchain since the new one wasn't that good so maybe he is waiting till he get a proper kernel to release. That could also be it.
EDIT2: He just told me it was not the toolchain but a Linux kernel patch
I am sorry, but I don't have time for these games. Feeyo, does not wish to share his kernel sources. It his right, not his legal right, but still his decision.
Personally, the events that caused his banning do not sit well with me and I think it would have been better if they had never happened.
That said, it does not change the fact, Feeyo, for reasons only he knows, does not share his work with others, quite the opposite.
I will not waste any more of my time on supposed sources for his kernels, which, at best, are old sources which he really used at the time.
Okay whatever I don't understand this... I'm going to link this thread to Feeyo though...
I would love to see such talented developers such as feeyo and erasmux working together. Yeah i know, feeyo has to publish his sources, your are all right. I hope Cfreak can get him doing this.
The dev. at the hero section is getting really quiet.
I think the point is the villian team. They are making really good ROMs but when Feeyo came to XDA he delivered a very nice ROM. Noobody was very nice to him only said "play by rules, give me your sources". I think you get him in a very wrong way. He is a nice guy and very friendly over Cronos Forum, doing a great job and very intersting in new things. It would be a pleaure to welcome Feeyo back on board here but i think you all scared him.
Sorry for my bad english.
Related
This is a dev thread, and only for developers, please avoid of posting UNUSEFUL things. Thanks
Guys, there you go, this is zImage compiled with x10_x10mini_X10minipro_x8_eclair_2.1.A.0.435.tar.gz sources, built with semc_mimmi_defconfig. I would recommend to devs to go here, seems like it's more active that old threads.
Added splboot.ko compiled with X10 mini pro kernel sources (same config as zImage) , address 0x00200000
Also included a nice sh for insmodding, and dmesg modules.
SPLBOOT MODDED SOURCES ON MY APPORTS INDEX!
Original sources can be found on FreeXperia git, and ARMv6 by nAa at X8 bootloader bypass thread
Thanks to nobodyAtall for porting splboot to ARMv6. Thanks to aZuZu and doixanh for helping and side tips.
D4rKn3sSyS said:
This is a dev thread, and only for developers, please avoid of posting UNUSEFUL things. Thanks
Guys, there you go, this is zImage compiled with x10_x10mini_X10minipro_x8_eclair_2.1.A.0.435.tar.g z sources, built with semc_mimmi_defconfig. I would recommend to devs to go here, seems like it's more active that old threads.
Thanks to aZuZu and doixanh for helping me compiling.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it seems to be great news! but what is zImage for? how can it improve the Custom roms?
PTGamer said:
it seems to be great news! but what is zImage for? how can it improve the Custom roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just read the wikipedia article on zImage. Here.
wikipedia said:
The filename of the bootable image is not important, but by convention it is called vmlinuz or zImage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you make bzImage? 2.3 Mb is to big for download... Thanks! Nice work!
Any progress on bootloader bypass?
PTGamer said:
it seems to be great news! but what is zImage for? how can it improve the Custom roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a dev thread, why it's supposed that this is related with custom roms?. zImage it's kernel executable (compressed btw).
Uploaded splboot.ko module, seems working well, if you are gonna try, be sure that you chmod to 777.
For development & testing you can use chmod 777 but never forget to set permissions correctly before releasing something!
Snoopo said:
For development & testing you can use chmod 777 but never forget to set permissions correctly before releasing something!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry, don't get your point. If i get you ok then you mean that I need to chmod +x or 777 on linux, before publishing some?... then why people can use on windows, and then release?? (Yes windows simply damages permissions)
You just need to chmod on phone (or use unyaffs.. chmod sounds easier)
D4rKn3sSyS said:
I'm sorry, don't get your point. If i get you ok then you mean that I need to chmod +x or 777 on linux, before publishing some?... then why people can use on windows, and then release?? (Yes windows simply damages permissions)
You just need to chmod on phone (or use unyaffs.. chmod sounds easier)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think he mean you can use chmod 777 while For development & testing
but set correct permissions before releasing
mean dont keep 777 but correct it if 777 not needed
(+x or what ever i dont know more permissions type lol )
heh yeah... Maybe it's my linux administration thinking:
Permission 777 is bad ^^
You should better find out which user or group shall have execute ,rewad or write-rights and then set the correct permission...
for example:
chown 0:2000 /foo
chmod 750 /foo
you see? Okay on a mobile it's really not that important but think of that there is someone who writes a bad app that exploits just a permission of CM7 or CM6 that is used in every phone... and woops ^^ or whatever ^^
D4rKn3sSyS said:
Guys, there you go, this is zImage compiled with x10_x10mini_X10minipro_x8_eclair_2.1.A.0.435.tar.gz sources, built with semc_mimmi_defconfig.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi D4rKn3sSyS (toughest nickname to write :-D),
Where do you get the sources? From SE developers' site?
What's that kernel version? If it's to 2.6.29, it should be patched to reach 2.6.32, am i wrong?
What's splboot module for? Does anybody try to kexec-tool way?
Cheers,
ff0000.it
... I almost forget: this is the best thread on the forum, thanks D4! ;-D
ff0000.it said:
Hi D4rKn3sSyS (toughest nickname to write :-D),
Where do you get the sources? From SE developers' site?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes... i think.
ff0000.it said:
What's that kernel version? If it's to 2.6.29, it should be patched to reach 2.6.32, am i wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no... more source required.
ff0000.it said:
What's splboot module for? Does anybody try to kexec-tool way?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bootloader bypass.
Or at least, i think i'm right.
OmegaRED^ said:
Yes... i think.
no... more source required.
bootloader bypass.
Or at least, i think i'm right.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right, s.e site, right, and right
OmegaRED^ said:
no... more source required.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not such a big answer , i downloaded the sources from SE and it's a 2.6.29 kernel release as the one actually found in SE roms... now suppose i'd like to build a custom Android ROM based on Gingerbread branch that comes with kernel 2.6.35, it should be a good thing patch the kernel in order to take the SE one up to 2.6.35, isn't it?
To do that i think we've to take the Android kernel source git clone, extract all the patches from 2.6.29 to 2.6.35 (dealing with a single patch is harder than a small set of patches) and apply one by one crossing our fingers and hoping SE doesn't make so much modifications to the base parts of the kernel.
If we succeed we could maintain a custom kernel through patches.
OmegaRED^ said:
bootloader bypass.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If the meaning of bootloader bypassing is only to load a custom kernel, what if kexec-tool works? Isn't it a simple way to deal with a custom kernel? I never use it but it sounds easier...
ff0000.it said:
Not such a big answer , i downloaded the sources from SE and it's a 2.6.29 kernel release as the one actually found in SE roms... now suppose i'd like to build a custom Android ROM based on Gingerbread branch that comes with kernel 2.6.35, it should be a good thing patch the kernel in order to take the SE one up to 2.6.35, isn't it?
To do that i think we've to take the Android kernel source git clone, extract all the patches from 2.6.29 to 2.6.35 (dealing with a single patch is harder than a small set of patches) and apply one by one crossing our fingers and hoping SE doesn't make so much modifications to the base parts of the kernel.
If we succeed we could maintain a custom kernel through patches.
If the meaning of bootloader bypassing is only to load a custom kernel, what if kexec-tool works? Isn't it a simple way to deal with a custom kernel? I never use it but it sounds easier...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's simple enough to flash using Xrecovery or CMW.
The x10 forums made almost everything flash-able via Xrecovery
It's hard to isolate what to patch... consider that the big x10 threads have been messing with modified kernels for quite some time now..
Ip-tables, (CPU undervolt, overvolt and overclock) and many other mods directly implemented into the kernels.
And even so they are still stuck on the same kernel version.
SE has not even upgraded the kernel version with the 2.3.3 update.
So it may be possible but it makes alot of work for new drivers...ect..
It's best to try and optimize the current version and already working source instead of creating a whole new ball game.
OmegaRED^ said:
It's simple enough to flash using Xrecovery or CMW.
The x10 forums made almost everything flashable via Xrecovery
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you don't get my point... i was saying (from my point of view) that a kernel upgrading is mandatory (or it should be)...
It's the same if i have a Linux 2.4.x kernel with a GNU distribution that relies on mechanism such as sysfs that isn't supported in 2.4.x kernels (>= 2.6.x); so to build a custom Gingerbread ROM it's a good choice having a related kernel (from wikipedia it's 2.6.35).
And what's within Xrecovery and CWM? Flashing differs from building...
Saying that i don't want bluetooth or GPS or wifi support in my ROM, disable it from kernel and ROM building... that's the benefit of having custom kernels and ROMS.
Still i don't understand why you answer me with Xrecovery and CWM
Please don't miss under stand.
All i am saying is that without source it becomes hard.
SE did not upgrade the kernel to 35 for the big x10 or the x8 so there is very little to work with.
It would be awesome to get the kernel to that level.
But it's easier to rather tweak the kernel we currently have.
ff0000.it said:
If the meaning of bootloader bypassing is only to load a custom kernel, what if kexec-tool works? Isn't it a simple way to deal with a custom kernel? I never use it but it sounds easier...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^^
This is why i commented on CWM and Xrecovery.
Afair there are even custom kernels but they are not really stable and discontinued.
s0ftcorn said:
Afair there are even custom kernels but they are not really stable and discontinued.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you talking about?, we haven't already bypassed bootloader.
s0ftcorn said:
Afair there are even custom kernels but they are not really stable and discontinued.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The point is not the stability or the instability of a custom kernel, it's to have the chance of building a custom one...
It's my right to have a unstable custom kernel builded by me installed on my phone, isn't it? :-D
@D4: i'm going to learn more about "git" and then i'll try (in the spare time) to patch SE kernel up to 2.6.35 (with all git tags/branches) and the i'll upload it to github... no promise at all, by i'll try ;-D
D4rKn3sSyS said:
What are you talking about?, we haven't already bypassed bootloader.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah my bad. Have read the custom kernel stuff while i was completely new to smartphones. The X10 has custom kernels, but theire development is afair discontinued.
Sorry for the irritation.
Been playing around with Kernel development and created an overclocked kernel for the 4.0.2.A.0 stock Rom.
There's nothing too speciall in it at the moment, but lets you overclock the Ray to 1.9Ghz using the source released by SE and the modified CPU steps that IF2 posted here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1165355
There's no custom bootloader/Clockwork mod and no additional governers (at the moment) although I may add these in future as I learn more.
It seems to work well enough, and everything seems to be working as standard. I experience random lock-ups at 1.9 and occasionally 1.8Ghz, especially when it goes into/out of sleep when the screen turns off. Lower frequencies seem stable though.
This is released as-is, I'm using it myself but I can't be held responsible for any instabilities or failures you might experience. Just thought it might be of use to some people.
The new .img file can be downloaded from here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17615284/4.0.2.A.0-Overclock.img
To install just use fastboot in the usual way. To return to stock, extract kernel.sin from the official update image using WinZip/WinRar etc and flash using fastboot again.
Thanks a lot hartej !
Just flashed it, seems to work as described. I OC to 1.4 Ghz
Will report back if there is any issue.
Looking forward for additional CPU governors, insecure kernel, autoroot and clockwork recovery
Thanks again for your hard work
piflechien said:
Looking forward for additional CPU governors, insecure kernel, autoroot and clockwork recovery
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the plan eventually, but still just learing the ropes so don't expect all that by tomorrow Glad I could help.
Thanks for the efforts. I set up to 1.3 Ghz and so far so good.
glad to see u finally posting this
my latest sources are pushed to:
https://github.com/DooMLoRD/Xperia-2011-Kernel-2.6.32.9
enjoy!
DooMLoRD said:
glad to see u finally posting this
my latest sources are pushed to:
https://github.com/DooMLoRD/Xperia-2011-Kernel-2.6.32.9
enjoy!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Finally? Cheeky buggar!
Not really had any time unfortunately due to work, but if you've updated the defconfig for the Ray I might have a bash at your sources in the morning (still don't understand them!)
Thanks again though - if it wasn't for your help and the fact you stopped developing for the Ray I'd never had started playing about with kernels myself!
hartej said:
Finally? Cheeky buggar!
Not really had any time unfortunately due to work, but if you've updated the defconfig for the Ray I might have a bash at your sources in the morning (still don't understand them!)
Thanks again though - if it wasn't for your help and the fact you stopped developing for the Ray I'd never had started playing about with kernels myself!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hehe... no defconfigs are only updated for ARC & PLAY... i wont be updating defconfigs for other devices... though u can easily figure out the additions to be done
if u need any help send me p.m./gtalk
DooMLoRD said:
hehe... no defconfigs are only updated for ARC & PLAY... i wont be updating defconfigs for other devices... though u can easily figure out the additions to be done
if u need any help send me p.m./gtalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will do - thanks again for your help
It could be a good idea to move this thread in the newly created subforum dedicated to the Ray: http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1351
Can you also make a kernel for cm7 with some other governors like Doomkernel's one but for fxp043. Thanks in advance
I've created a new thread in the Ray forum as I don't think I can move this one without being a mod: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=18829345
nos1609 said:
Can you also make a kernel for cm7 with some other governors like Doomkernel's one but for fxp043. Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is all pretty new to me, so don't expect too much too fast!
In future I may look at CM7 images but currently I'm on the stock firmware (at least until the flash in CM7 is fixed) and as I have to use the phone daily I'm not prepared to switch between firmwares to be developing for different sources at this time.
I've been using CM7 on my other devices (HTC Desire and ZTE Blade) so will most likely switch to it when some of the bugs have been worked out.When this happens I'll look at the CM7 Kernel.
what does it mean when they say rom has been re synced.
thks
It's when the dev recompiles the ROM with the latest source code oh which it's based. Cyanogenmod9 for example might be updated so you get whatever fixes came with that. But the dev didn't do anything to fix something device specific (like our 2d drivers being broken). Here is a changelog for CM9 so you can see what updates you got from a CM9 resync
http://changelog.bbqdroid.org/#olympus/cm9/next
Of course I could be talking out my ass and someone can feel free to correct me.
great explanation. exactly what i was looking for. thank you sir.
Because I'm not planning to develop kernel in XDA, I just want to share my kernel to any Xperia S that may want to test it...
Here is the infos about the kernel :
http://www.kaskus.co.id/showpost.php?p=730472163&postcount=4003
Here is the download link for the kernel :
http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?gvdnocvcm7k4kic
Here is the download modules for fix WIFI, backlight, etc because of in compatible module version
http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?28zfi5b2icqniye
I recommend to test the kernel for 1 day, after you satisfied, backup current module in /system/lib/modules, and flash the new modules using CWM.
Post any problem/screenshoot here..
thxyou
thxyou
i'm already prepare the next version, going to test it for 1 week,,, really cool...
A little update to KAMSEUPAY kernel user..., enjoy..
http://www.kaskus.co.id/showpost.php?p=734161982&postcount=4154
Nice to see Indonesian developer on XDA.
Why dont you just post the thread under Development subforum since many would see your work there. There are not many developments going on for Xperia S, it would be really nice to see one more developer as it may encourage other developers to come and show their skills.
wisnuhadi23 said:
Nice to see Indonesian developer on XDA.
Why dont you just post the thread under Development subforum since many would see your work there. There are not many developments going on for Xperia S, it would be really nice to see one more developer as it may encourage other developers to come and show their skills.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I don't plan to put any development in XDA, I just want to share my current work, especially for local forum.. just posting here, incase someone want to test it..
Hi, does this kernel come with autorooting feature and CWM recovery?
Would be very useful if you could add into next version becos I really like your kernel. But since there's no root, I use advanced ics kernel for the time being.
fajarep said:
Hi, I don't plan to put any development in XDA, I just want to share my current work, especially for local forum.. just posting here, incase someone want to test it..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No the point of putting this in development is that a lot more people could download, test and report feedback on your work this seems like a decent kernel aswell, it'd be worth seeing what other devs have to say about it
xperiasuser said:
Hi, does this kernel come with autorooting feature and CWM recovery?
Would be very useful if you could add into next version becos I really like your kernel. But since there's no root, I use advanced ics kernel for the time being.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i don't know about autorooting, because it should be autoroot.sh(at least i saw it on script, but, because i'm using advanced kernel version before flashing this kernel, so I don't know if autoot.sh execute properly
fNOOB said:
No the point of putting this in development is that a lot more people could download, test and report feedback on your work this seems like a decent kernel aswell, it'd be worth seeing what other devs have to say about it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks but i just want to keep it in general section..., because i'm not developing in xda, i think, it is not nice to put something in development section while you can't find something that "developed" in those area. i mean, for me, i just patch, fix some little error, nothing else, i haven't actually "develope" kernel(making new feature), i just backport some high kernel version into this kernel, and i don't think that count as "develope"
fajarep said:
i don't know about autorooting, because it should be autoroot.sh(at least i saw it on script, but, because i'm using advanced kernel version before flashing this kernel, so I don't know if autoot.sh execute properly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The newer kernel version has much better battery life compared to 3.0.8, I can confirm that your kernel's root did not execute properly on ICS, 6.1.A.1.58
Tested out apps that require root like titanium backup and adaway, all returned messages saying no root access.
So, I temporarily use the advanced stock ics kernel.
Wow keren nih ada Orang Indo
xperiasuser said:
The newer kernel version has much better battery life compared to 3.0.8, I can confirm that your kernel's root did not execute properly on ICS, 6.1.A.1.58
Tested out apps that require root like titanium backup and adaway, all returned messages saying no root access.
So, I temporarily use the advanced stock ics kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i see, thanks, going to take a look for the script. i haven't test 6.1.A.1.58, because my local ICS version doesn't release that version...
Elwino2.3 said:
Wow keren nih ada Orang Indo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hehehe terima kasih bro..
fajarep said:
i see, thanks, going to take a look for the script. i haven't test 6.1.A.1.58, because my local ICS version doesn't release that version...
hehehe terima kasih bro..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
guys.. please. use English
it's too bad that i've just seen this now. ur 2nd kernel booting just fine without wipe anything. and i thinks it's really good too. gonna flash the modules later on.
keep modding bro..
id kaskus: cLcL xD
Not sure, if it is possible...
But, due to the fact, that Rebellos is inactive and volk204 obviously stopped development and Tigrouzen also quit ZenDroKat, we have to look for new devs to continue work on Android development on Wave devices...
Next target should be Android 4.4.3...
What do you think?
I am pretty much sure the last developer that is willing to work is both rebellos and volk.
I have one dev here in poland, but No on XDA. I tell him about that )
In my opinion...
Better move is to answer here the truth about further Develpment:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1459391&page=3
Please our main Developer:
@volk204
@Rebellos
Is this end of Development for S8500 and S8530?
@Tigrouzen
I saw only you have removed your work from your site...
I know no details nor reason...
Thanx in advance.
Best Regards
Yes...
It seems to be the end...
Taxidriver05 said:
Yes...
It seems to be the end...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
End , but @volk204 , @Rebellos @Tigrouzen i request u plz make kernel for wave3 , nd support adfree , team work :good:
How bout u guys try compiling yourself?
I mean they're already many guides out there, So anyone can learn and compile there own Rom!
And I do t think it makes any point to compile a rom with same bugs etc...
I'd rather focus on fixing present bugs then compiling a new rom,
Anyways, M not being disrespectful or something, but telling u the fact!
But if u guys really want then I can compile Rom, but kernel is a bit complicated for me,
So Team work is best!
Cheers.
How bout u guys try compiling yourself?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very good idea... but...
I think if some users are waiting, and we waiting very long during all this time...
years.
So maybe it is not wrong, if main Developers could tell us...
discontinued or not...
As you can see, Rebellos for instance, not more talk in public...
...but he is "active" in XDA...
In my opinion it is an question of respect...
We are not married... but it is strange... that so many Devs left project...
But nobody is able to say good bye...
hero355 is good example. Check his Signature:
I'm out of from bada development! Thanks all who were interested my Rom and all works on bada.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanx hero355, he made things for bada and more and he is fair...
Because he knows few users have hope for his help...
And Rebellos for instance could update his Thread:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1459391
""Sorry, no more updates"" or something similar...
Nobody will kill him.
Really easy task...
Best Regards
Compiling is a thing, fixing bugs another.
I can compile ROM or kernel, and changes some in sources for rom and kernel (making Bigmem, SD or Nand kernels for example), but i can't solve any bugs, because it need a knowledge i don't have, and few here have this knowledge...
Well...
I think, we have all abilities...
GT-S85XX are no problem anymore...
GT-S8600 Bootloader is nearly open for Android...
I tihnk, GT-S8600 is a good device to run Android 4.4.3...
Loyal tester, user & fan
After hundreds of flash still back to bada now..
Thank you to all developers
Just made little customization rom base on china's LC2 bada
2.0 source..
WFFARREL
As from my side - the project is discontinued. I'm not interested in working on it anymore. Thanks for such a long time "together".
As from my side - the project is discontinued. I'm not interested in working on it anymore. Thanks for such a long time "together".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much for answer.
So we know now actual status from our project leader Rebellos.
@volk204
Please, could you answer also...
Continue or end of Development for Wave 1 and 2 ?
Btw. it is NO shame to end projects.
Thanx in advance.
Best Regards
adfree said:
Thank you very much for answer.
So we know now actual status from our project leader Rebellos.
@volk204
Please, could you answer also...
Continue or end of Development for Wave 1 and 2 ?
Btw. it is NO shame to end projects.
Thanx in advance.
Best Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi adfree
I think it is near end. I can't fix functional kernel issue like charger without Rebellos.
Now i'm very busy with real life
And my USB is completely broken, but i hope i will repair it.
But i think i can find time to build new releases and support RIL bugs, if we will find it.
Regards
Nikolay
volk204 thank you very much for fast answer.
So we know actual status.
Thanx.
Best Regards
volk204 said:
Now i'm very busy with real life
And my USB is completely broken, but i hope i will repair it.
But i think i can find time to build new releases and support RIL bugs, if we will find it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mr. Volk, if you repair your cable and find time for it, is it possible to put latest updates (GPS, modem etc.) on your 4.1.2 rom for one last time? Your roms was really good. A bit slow but number of bugs are very very small. Because of that I always prefer your roms. Thank you for your all works.
Best regards
@volk204
- Could you help us to build Android Kernel on first place, then later ROM for S8600 WAVE3.
Because adfree already hacked bootloader and its opened now for new OS.
If you get some free time, please, take look and try to help us.
Thanx in advance for you help.
Someone asked earlier to compile Oleg sources, here is what i got after compiling with "make PROJECTNAME=s8600" : http://www.multiupload.nl/01QBHIU857
I have absolutely no idea on how to use this, look like it's little kernel made to boot android kernel.
BenzoX said:
Someone asked earlier to compile Oleg sources, here is what i got after compiling with "make PROJECTNAME=s8600" : http://www.multiupload.nl/01QBHIU857
I have absolutely no idea on how to use this, look like it's little kernel made to boot android kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@BenzoX its kernel, thank you very very much..
@adfree you must try this, i think you finally can finish this.
Galaxy3HELL said:
@BenzoX its kernel, thank you very very much..
@adfree you must try this, i think you finally can finish this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After some search, it look like it's "Little" kernel, some kind of bootloader. It load some function (see here for more info : https://www.codeaurora.org/blogs/little-kernel-based-android-bootloader, i don't find lot of doc about it) but i highly doubt it can boot the whole android system.