Am on Froshedyo Vanilla + Green minimal theme and was wondering does the min CPU of 245mhz and 19mhz eat up the amount of battery? Do they run the same voltage? Any of you guys see a difference as far battery life running 19? I know it makes the phone take a little longer to wake up when a call is coming in. Thoughts?
Currently I have it 528/245 Smartass with a charging profile
I always had problems with lag when I clocked down to 19. I never really felt that it provided any extra battery life, but others feel that it does.
+1 on the lag. We run 245 and its smooth.
Sent from my FroyoEris using Tapatalk
+1
There have been occasions, possibly the particular combination of ROM, the apps installed, and what app or method I'm using to overclock which have resulted in 19 working fine sometimes, but most of the time at least 160 or 210 (?) would be a necessary happy medium so that waking the screen or answering calls wouldn't be downright excruciating, so my short answer is yes, at least 210 or 245. I forget and am too lazy to look if 210 was an option, and I'm tired. LOL.
FroShedYo runs Conap's CFS kernel, and, IIRC, it was made quite clear in that thread that the kernel runs best at a minimum of 245 MHz.
I'll say this - last month I spent a lot of time going back and forth between xtrSENSE and xtrROM, both running at 604.8 max and as low as 19.2 min (I tried all steps from 245 down to 19.2), and CELB, running at 710 max and 245 min, and I get much better battery life with CELB. In fact, with xtrROM I had to set some of my update times for apps that I use to longer intervals just to get through the end of the day with 20% battery life left. With CELB I never finish the day with less than 40%, and it's often over 50%.
It may be different for you, but that's what happens on my phone.
I use 19.2.
122 and 19.2 both use the same voltage though I believe. I only use 19.2 because it keeps the average down.
I listen to pandora with 19.2 min 480max smartass with no lag.
Related
Hi guys!For the last few days(that I have my Hero rooted that is) I'm using VillainRom 10 as my everyday ROM and have tried some others.Anyway,that's not the point!
Being one of the lucky ones whose Hero can happily overclock to 768 I came to use RaduG's extremekernel and ben39's no-bfs no-whining kernel.With the second,while configuring OverclockWidget I saw that it gives a 848MHz option with auto-detect frequencies.Is it possible?I'm not asking about stable daily use,but even for some minutes for benchmarking?Has anyone achieved it?Without making their phone catch on fire that is!
And secondly,why are we all using linux 2.6.29(for total newbies I mean the kernel) while there is 2.6.32-33-34?Can't a newer kernel be compiled for use with the Hero?Newer kernels would provide native ext4 support and would probably prove to be better overall.
Oh,forgot one more!I am currently running on minimum 176MHz-maximum 749MHz(after I got a couple reboots with 768 I abandoned 19MHz for stability) with screen on and minimum 123MHz-maximum 384MHz with screen off.Should I give it a higher minimum frequency?Sometimes it lags when waking up,the screen turns on but shows nothing but black and turns off again or it turns on and everything is distorted,colors are completely distorted,background is upside down and some other unnormal things,but everything is alright when turning the screen off and back on again.Does it have to do anything with the frequencies I am using?I am running on VillainRom 10.3.
Now I have set the minimums to 160 and 190 MHz to see what happens!
Thanks in advance!
About the high MHz... I have done it with over 800 but don't max it out at 848 or your phone will freeze but anything below works And that screen **** I've also had and it has something to do with the high MHz (don't know why) but it helped me to set the MHz lower when the phone sleeps in SetCPU And at last about the kernel... It runs on the old one on Android 2.1 but in 2.2 it will be upgraded to ....33 or ....32 don't remember which...
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
Thanks for your reply C0mpu13rFr34k!
I know Eclair is running on the old kernel.I just would like to know if it is possible to compile a newer kernel for it.
As for the frequencies...Are my settings alright?Some too high or too low?The way I see it there is a big gap between maximum and minimum frequencies when screen on which results on the CPU working at low frequencies most of the time,thus sacrificing performance.But it helps with battery life and presumably this and the screen-off underclocking reduce the overall damage caused to the CPU by the overclocking,which is said to reduce the CPU's total lifetime by 50% or more,depending on how much you overclock it.Working at 749 I sometimes get a nice 43 degrees Celsius while charging,but that's only when charging.Average temperatures are 30 for standby and 37 with screen on(average,can be lower or higher).
And one more question.At 800+ how hot does it get?Will it be stable for some minutes to do some basic benchmarking or nah..?
Thanks!
tolis626 said:
Thanks for your reply C0mpu13rFr34k!
I know Eclair is running on the old kernel.I just would like to know if it is possible to compile a newer kernel for it.
As for the frequencies...Are my settings alright?Some too high or too low?The way I see it there is a big gap between maximum and minimum frequencies when screen on which results on the CPU working at low frequencies most of the time,thus sacrificing performance.But it helps with battery life and presumably this and the screen-off underclocking reduce the overall damage caused to the CPU by the overclocking,which is said to reduce the CPU's total lifetime by 50% or more,depending on how much you overclock it.Working at 749 I sometimes get a nice 43 degrees Celsius while charging,but that's only when charging.Average temperatures are 30 for standby and 37 with screen on(average,can be lower or higher).
And one more question.At 800+ how hot does it get?Will it be stable for some minutes to do some basic benchmarking or nah..?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If your phone is stable your settings are just fine even though your phone might have problems waking up if the low freq is under 246MHz (something like that) Also if you want better performance you might want to test some other freqs and then benchmark... Sometimes it makes a BIG difference if your phone is running at 691MHz or 710MHz For me my phone works like **** if it runs at 749MHz but it works like a dream at 729MHz (I think the difference was 0.5-0.8MFLOPS) Im also pretty sure your temp is fine (OC shouldn't make your phone that much hotter since the voltages in all ROMs are adjustet). If you should compile a newer kernel you would first of all need a .32 (.33?) from HTC because of hardware capabilities and im sure there's is A LOT more things devs need to compile such a kernel but i don't know to much about kernels I don't really know that much about 800+ because I only did it once and benchmarked it (MFLOPS was **** and i couldn't get them high at all) actually it slowed down my phone but you should test it. Maybe your very lucky and your phone can take it
Well,I have set it to 653min-749max with screen on and 160min-352max with screen off.Testing only!But it runs like a dream if we don't take into account a small lagging when I turn the screen on and it has to change frequencies!But it's great so far.Will see how battery life goes!By the way,tried 800,806 and 848MHz,but none worked.It didn't crash or something,it just wouldn't change to it and stayed at lower frequencies(low as 246).
Thanks for your time anyway!
And a small question...How bad does overclocking affect the CPU's life?I asked around and was told that the maximum overclock for desktop PCs is 20-25%,depending on the CPU,while needing special cooling systems,and that it can reduce the CPU's life up to 50%.Given that we overclock over 40%,how bad do we damage our CPUs?
tolis626 said:
Well,I have set it to 653min-749max with screen on and 160min-352max with screen off.Testing only!But it runs like a dream if we don't take into account a small lagging when I turn the screen on and it has to change frequencies!But it's great so far.Will see how battery life goes!By the way,tried 800,806 and 848MHz,but none worked.It didn't crash or something,it just wouldn't change to it and stayed at lower frequencies(low as 246).
Thanks for your time anyway!
And a small question...How bad does overclocking affect the CPU's life?I asked around and was told that the maximum overclock for desktop PCs is 20-25%,depending on the CPU,while needing special cooling systems,and that it can reduce the CPU's life up to 50%.Given that we overclock over 40%,how bad do we damage our CPUs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't heard to much about that actually but from what I've heard it shouldn't damage the CPU at all because of the voltage adjustments but i find that very hard to believe... Talking from personal experience my phone runs as smooth now as it did when i bought it so my CPU has probably taken minamal- or no damage at all and I got it when it had just come out here in Denmark (Europe) which is about 8+ months i think? So I wouldn't care to much about the lifetime since It's probably like 1-2 years and by that time I don't think people are using the Hero anymore Keep up the good work with optimizing and your welcome
I just wanted to know what everyones eris is oc to. I am currently overlocked at 806mhz, i cant go any higher than that.
Mines at 768 anything over that it overheats
mines at 768. I can go up to 806 if I wanted to but it sometimes causes issues so its better to stay at 768 to be safe at least for my eris and my fiances as well.
ive seen some ppl overclocked to 825mhz fine
3.5 Ghz
ten chars
wow thats some eris you got there
mine is very stable at 787, it can go to 806 but s**t starts to force close. I use cpuboost on smartass governor with minimum 787 maximum 787 with no sleep profile and surprisingly it doesnt get hot or get horrible battery life and im on it pretty much all day (except when im with my chick she will throw my phone out the window) lol
710. I haven't even tried going higher, my battery's reached 105-110F just at 710 (yeah I know just the battery, but still) so I'm too worried to try anything higher.
710 does me well.
On both my old and new Eris, I can go up to 806 but I set the max at 768.
Mine shutters and self destructs if I set it higher than 710
Edit: just for giggles I tried again. As soon as I touched 787 it restarted and would not restart till I flashed it again. ;-) oh well. I have liked this phone but can't wait till the Thunderbolt launches.
Sent from my Eris using XDA App
two eris at 768 no issues here...
linpack average of 5.178 on Koas gingerbread V8 rom
Downloads 860kbit/s and upload 1740kbit/s Max after enabling autokiller
Radio 2.42.02.10.29 See http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=10748354&posted=1#post10748354
768 max is the highest it will go. Used to run it at 710 though recently I have found it is much happier at 768 on Smartass.
Autokiller: Ultimate
Linpack: 5.30 is the norm on Froyshedyo 10 w/ cfs v9
It ran about as smooth when I started running KaosFroyo back at about V34 at 710 max, though with Kaos busy with Gingerbread I hopped to a different rom until GB is a little more operational.
It does get a tad warm, though nothing I would fret about.
I just stick to 710-245 smartass
806 with colin's battery tweak.
CCCP4ever said:
I just stick to 710-245 smartass
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Word.
There was a fellow over on Androidforums.com that liked the way his Eris ran at 806. That phone was dead within one week of his commencement of overclocking. (He may have set min=max, rather than mess with governors, I don't know all of the details).
When electronics break down, they do so for two reasons:
(1) intrinsic chemical processes such as corrosion, electromigration, whisker formation, etc. - these are all accelerated by heat.
(2) mechanical ruptures caused by prolonged mechanical strain or thermal cycling - both caused by heat.
In both cases, heat is the principal enemy.
Your Eris has no fan inside - just sayin.
While we're at it, have a look at the VDD_6 versus VDD_7 supply voltage definitions in this kernel code
If the voltage ramping is the same as in the note in the code (see "MSM7201A") a processor supply step-up occurs in the frequency table like this:
F >= 787 --> Vdd = 1.325 V
120 <= F <= 767 --> Vdd = 1.2V
Because the power dissipation per clock is proportional to Vdd^2, and the power rate is proportional to the clock frequency, the expected power dissipation ratio of 806 versus 710 is
(806/710)*(1.325/1.2)^2 = 1.384
You are burning up nearly 40% more power at 806 than at 710 - for a performance benefit of only (806/710) = 1.135 .... 14%
bftb0
bftb0 said:
Word.
There was a fellow over on Androidforums.com that liked the way his Eris ran at 806. That phone was dead within one week of his commencement of overclocking. (He may have set min=max, rather than mess with governors, I don't know all of the details).
When electronics break down, they do so for two reasons:
(1) intrinsic chemical processes such as corrosion, electromigration, whisker formation, etc. - these are all accelerated by heat.
(2) mechanical ruptures caused by prolonged mechanical strain or thermal cycling - both caused by heat.
In both cases, heat is the principal enemy.
Your Eris has no fan inside - just sayin.
While we're at it, have a look at the VDD_6 versus VDD_7 supply voltage definitions in this kernel code
If the voltage ramping is the same as in the note in the code (see "MSM7201A") a processor supply step-up occurs in the frequency table like this:
F >= 787 --> Vdd = 1.325 V
120 <= F <= 767 --> Vdd = 1.2V
Because the power dissipation per clock is proportional to Vdd^2, and the power rate is proportional to the clock frequency, the expected power dissipation ratio of 806 versus 710 is
(806/710)*(1.325/1.2)^2 = 1.384
You are burning up nearly 40% more power at 806 than at 710 - for a performance benefit of only (806/710) = 1.135 .... 14%
bftb0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bftb, I don't think I've ever seen you post something that I haven't learned something from. Very interesting to see how little you gain going up to 806.
I usually stick around 710 too, but I bump up the min to 480 cause at 245 my phone takes too long to wake up when I get a call.
I decided to set my max at 528 today just for kicks, and I was surprised to see that it actually still felt kinda snappy. Not quite as smooth as with 710, but definitely usable for me.
first of all I dont feel 14% is a small amount when pushing the envelope as we are trying to do with the eris. In any hobby I've been in people go thru great lengths and spend all kinds of money and time for 10% improvements much less 14%. Actually more than I expected and makes me feel alot better about going from stock 528 to 768.
Now having made that argument I'm going to turn around and rubuke myself because even if there is an actual verifiable 30%+ improvement going from 528 to 786 it means nothing to me if I cant feel any difference in the contexts of a phone and I just cant tell much difference. Its not like a car in which it may feel the same to you but you win a race you would have lost before. With a phone subjective improvements experienced by the user is all that really matters. Many a time I've flashed, forgot to set OC and later THOUGHT I was overclocked or overclocked higher only to realize I've been using the phone without doing so. Never ONCE has it been because I thought "man this is slow, maybe I forgot to overclock". Always the other way: "man I thought this thing was overclocked and I'm running stock speeds". that alone tells me what I need to know about overclocking (yet I overclock to my phones stable max of 768 anyway. go figure).
i keep it at 710/245. its not a noticeable difference to me when i clock it above 710. however, when i put it back down to 528 it is noticeably more sluggish (the only exception to this being KGB or vanilla 2.1).
710 here. I can go up to 767 with a certain set up...
I seem to have one of the weaker Eris'. But 710 is fine for me!
I'm looking for a good baseline to see what works best on this phone.
list everything, screenshots prefer and please specify your rom, kernel, and theme.
Mine are as follows...
all info in my sig. I use 500-1400 conservative with a 500-500 power save profile set for when the screen is off.
My battery lasts between 28-42 hrs pending my usage level from high - low. YMMV.
Miui
200 to 1200
Conservative
Noop
Using no-frills
Same settings when using perception. Awesome battery life, almost two days.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
CM7
200-1400 On demand
nothing else changed in setcpu
using red drop them for theme changer
CM7 launcher (ADW)
Widgetlocker for lockscreen theme
So, I'm heavily themed, but not much in widgets.
Seems good on battery, can last ~14 hours with moderate to high use.
Stable as well, no major crashes other than the usual browser and market.
I use Voltage Control myself and I've UV'd all across the board by -50. I've also dropped max speed to 1000Mhz. The rest should be pretty self explanatory...
Oh and I can't really list battery life because my usage really varies day to day, by quite a bit. I will say that I definitely get through an entire day with very high usage with no problems at all. Much... MUCH better than when I was running stock.
Default voltages and frequencies, ondemand, ignore nice load
llescaflownell said:
CM7
200-1400 On demand
nothing else changed in setcpu
using red drop them for theme changer
CM7 launcher (ADW)
Widgetlocker for lockscreen theme
So, I'm heavily themed, but not much in widgets.
Seems good on battery, can last ~14 hours with moderate to high use.
Stable as well, no major crashes other than the usual browser and market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you notice any difference at all in performance? How much display time do you get?
Cansomeone tell me the stock voltages I think mine are messed up
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
roadrash7 said:
Cansomeone tell me the stock voltages I think mine are messed up
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Add 50 to each of the ones in my picture posted in the reply up above.
Simba501 said:
Default voltages and frequencies, ondemand, ignore nice load
Do you notice any difference at all in performance? How much display time do you get?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Day to day performance, there really is no difference than stock, but to compare quadrant, I got ~3300 stock, but at this OC I get ~4400. It's gonna be smooth as butter either way, I just like numbers
Display time, I'm not too sure, but my settings are at its 1/3 highest (so not too bright, but not too dim either for me). If I were to approximate, I would say a good 2 hours of the display being on, give or take an hour or too (not the best estimate, but Ill try and keep track next time and report back).
Rooted stock
No themes
I get a good 14 to 18 hrs (minimal usage during the day and heavier usage evenings/nights - lots of wifi or data intensive apps)
Kadin said:
Add 50 to each of the ones in my picture posted in the reply up above.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks but it looks like that is not stock settings, turns out if you click revert in setcpu it tells you how to get back to stock. they are...
1200-1275
1000-1175
800- 1075
500 - 975
200 - 950
my new settings are...
1200-1175
1000-1100
800 - 1000
500 - 925
200 - 850
all is well so far. stress test with no probs.
Here's my settings
Main Profile: 200Mhz Min 1Ghz Max running conservative governor. During the day. Conservative is performing better than ondemand for me.
I've also been toying with the up and down thresholds on the conservative governor to find a difference. Haven't really experienced any lag unless I set the up threshold to 90 or over.
Screen Off: 200 Min 500 Max also conservative
Charging: 200 Min 1400 Max ondemand
Battery <25% 200Min 800Max conservative
I've been finding the phone is just as good running at 800mhz max on the main profile. It's amazing how much faster this thing is then my captivate.
As far as voltages
1600: 1450
1400: 1325
1200: 1225
1000: 1100
800: 1000
500: 900
200: 825
Been getting amazing battery life. Been on battery for 10 hours now. Still 65% battery. Not bad.
My phone absolutely blows for overclocking. anytime i try the settings posted here it locks up
Also using No Frills here. Settings are:
Max: 1200
Min: 200
Conservative and Noop
I unplug it at 7am and by the time I get off of work at 5:30ish I still have 60%+ of my battery left. Running MIUI with quite a few widgets and I leave wifi on all the time.
roadrash7 said:
thanks but it looks like that is not stock settings, turns out if you click revert in setcpu it tells you how to get back to stock. they are...
1200-1275
1000-1175
800- 1075
500 - 975
200 - 950
my new settings are...
1200-1175
1000-1100
800 - 1000
500 - 925
200 - 850
all is well so far. stress test with no probs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for this!
DJSLINKARD said:
My phone absolutely blows for overclocking. anytime i try the settings posted here it locks up
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Might have to Overvolt. I had to overvolt 1400Mhz by 25mv in order to get it stable.
Also I've noticed lately when it's not happy with the setCPU settings I'm using the phone seems to emit a high pitched frequency when you put your ear to the back cover. When I get stable it appears to stop.
roadrash7 said:
thanks but it looks like that is not stock settings, turns out if you click revert in setcpu it tells you how to get back to stock. they are...
1200-1275
1000-1175
800- 1075
500 - 975
200 - 950
my new settings are...
1200-1175
1000-1100
800 - 1000
500 - 925
200 - 850
all is well so far. stress test with no probs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure what to tell ya. I just installed SetCPU and this is the default settings showing - the same as Voltage Control and what I was referring to. I deleted the boot and profile settings first from Voltage Control and then rebooted, then installed SetCPU.
The only thing I can think of is that since I'm running UnNamed with Entropy's daily driver, maybe the voltage was tweaked from him? I'm only assuming because reading through his thread doesn't seem to indicate that he upped the default voltage on all levels. Unless I missed it somewhere.
This is in Entropy's Daily Driver thread - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=18433190&postcount=213
Kadin said:
Not sure what to tell ya. I just installed SetCPU and this is the default settings showing - the same as Voltage Control and what I was referring to. I deleted the boot and profile settings first from Voltage Control and then rebooted, then installed SetCPU.
The only thing I can think of is that since I'm running UnNamed with Entropy's daily driver, maybe the voltage was tweaked from him? I'm only assuming because reading through his thread doesn't seem to indicate that he upped the default voltage on all levels. Unless I missed it somewhere.
This is in Entropy's Daily Driver thread - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=18433190&postcount=213
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the clarification
I'm still trying to find settings that give the most performance and give the best battery life
bump...
No one cares to share?
Stock voltages and frequencies - on demand
Charging - stock frequencies - on demand
screen off - 200-500 conservative
Hi!
While playing around with my hero more and more I've been experimenting with different roms, kernels and cpu clock speeds. While doing that I've been trying to keep below 710MHz, but after a while i thought "what the hell..." and kept it at 710MHz for a long time. At 710MHz my hero seems to work fine, a little faster then it used to be, and a little more battery consuming. My noob question is since most of the post in here says " be careful going all the way up to 710MHz" almost no one suggest trying anything above, am I doing something wrong? Is the increased performance and the decreased battery life all in my head? I'm using setcpu 2.24, been tested on most roms here, both flykernel 12 and 13 and LV 5.0 and LX 6.2 ++++, and of course i always give it SU.
also, if i'm doing this right, my phone does not get particularly hot at 710MHz, so could i go even higher?
There are differences in devices. Mine for example freezes totally at 710.
I have been using my overclocked hero for a year now, running at 730mhz with no problems, my maximum is 748mhz but approximately after 20 minutes of runing at so high freq the hero was doing really some weird things..730mhz is my ok freq where I can run it without freezing up or any errors, the back cover gets little hot only when doing hards tasks..oh and, dont enable auto apply overclock on boot when testing the highest overclock, did that you dont want to be there when hero freezes up I just pulled out the battery...
I can overcloking my Hero with no problem upto 748.8mHz. If i use 760mHz my Hero are freeze...
Overclocked to 729, it works fine but eats battery like anything. Speeds above 614 are too much for our Heros poor battery.
I'm overclocking to 691, cause it freezes at 710.
If the cpu is really running at 691 for a while it goes upto 40°C. Just use a temperature profile in setcpu.
691 Mhz - 176 Mhz too, moderately stable.
Mine is stable up to 729 MHz
Mine freezes at 710MHz. For everyday use i have 614/352 Screen On settings
172-691Mhz Smartass is good idea. My hero is freeze at 729Mhz.
I am not that aggressive, 352 - 633 MHz. So far very stable.
690 is optimal for me, it does not freeze at 710 but it becames slower if I do a benchmark.
264-633 smartassv2 works perfectly for me. I found at 710 it was a little faster/smoother, but my battery lasted less than a day - using gps at 710 would also cause my phone to reboot.
Mine works till 691, at 710 freezes after few minutes.
Ive been running the "cm7-1.4highpro-test-rev3" kernel and it runs great. I've been bumping up my undervolting slowly, and im at -475 at 216 mhz, which (in theory) should be the undervolt clock speed that will save me most battery becasue i have phone set to go between 216 mhz and 312 mhz when screens off. Ive got both 216 and 312 mhz undervolted extremely heavily and i haven't seen ANY issues. The rest of clock speeds are at -100 or so, and if i push much further than that the phone locks up and does weird stuff. This would lead me to believe that the undervolting IS indeed working. But can the processor really run at -475 @216mhz and [email protected] without any side affects?? I haven't once had it get stuck in sleep mode with screen off or ANYTHING, so im a bit unsure if it is actually undervolting or not.. Myrt undervolt shows that my phone is undervolted to the specific settings i set within SetCpu. I also havent seen much, if any, difference with battery life. With 10 hours of idle time, straight idle screen off whole time, wifi, gps, mobile data, 4g, bluetooth, all that stuff off and after 10 hours my battery is down to 85%.
I limited uv clocks, so there is a low limit. One day ill add more low end clocks but it won't matter because the photon uses a separate clock for suspend. I knew people would try to uv to 500 with it set on boot and screw there phone up. So this way I didn't have thousands of user error related uv issues. Uv does works but its more for high end than low end. Low end uv causes sleep of death.
w0lf215 said:
Ive been running the "cm7-1.4highpro-test-rev3" kernel and it runs great. I've been bumping up my undervolting slowly, and im at -475 at 216 mhz, which (in theory) should be the undervolt clock speed that will save me most battery becasue i have phone set to go between 216 mhz and 312 mhz when screens off. Ive got both 216 and 312 mhz undervolted extremely heavily and i haven't seen ANY issues. The rest of clock speeds are at -100 or so, and if i push much further than that the phone locks up and does weird stuff. This would lead me to believe that the undervolting IS indeed working. But can the processor really run at -475 @216mhz and [email protected] without any side affects?? I haven't once had it get stuck in sleep mode with screen off or ANYTHING, so im a bit unsure if it is actually undervolting or not.. Myrt undervolt shows that my phone is undervolted to the specific settings i set within SetCpu. I also havent seen much, if any, difference with battery life. With 10 hours of idle time, straight idle screen off whole time, wifi, gps, mobile data, 4g, bluetooth, all that stuff off and after 10 hours my battery is down to 85%.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
haha ok I understand, just thought I was going crazy there for a bit, or had the most amazing tegra 2 known to man. is there a way to UV the suspend mode then or no? And is my battery life at idle about average or low considering the UV. do you have any kernels for CM7 that aren't limited for UV? Thanks for reply, and all your hard work on the photon!!
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Changing suspend voltage can only be done in source. I havnt played with it yet because i need to test it on a stable kernel that way i know any issues would come from it. As far as extra uv steps its planned after wifi fix. I wont add 500 new steps probably 2 steps at a time(-25 steps). Im also planning on changing my clock table(multiples of 216 only). I might make a half step 1.0 kernel underclocked to 108~192. It will be mem underclocked and gpu/avp underclocked. With lower voltage tables on everything. Default scheduling will be powersave. Which you can check out with cpu master right now. That kernel will also have a tweaked 2 core start/stop.
w0lf215 said:
haha ok I understand, just thought I was going crazy there for a bit, or had the most amazing tegra 2 known to man. is there a way to UV the suspend mode then or no? And is my battery life at idle about average or low considering the UV. do you have any kernels for CM7 that aren't limited for UV? Thanks for reply, and all your hard work on the photon!!
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
"That kernel will also have a tweaked 2 core start/stop. "
Holy ****!
That would be the best thing
All new ones this week have tweaked 2nd core
DethMetalz69 said:
"That kernel will also have a tweaked 2 core start/stop. "
Holy ****!
That would be the best thing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Im building a battery version of top secret now
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App