I'm currently running the latest non oc/uv of dead horse, and I wanna know what exactly are the benefits of overclocking/undervolting?
I'm already getting really good battery life with the current kernel I have.
Thanks in advance!
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Basically Overclocking makes the phone faster at the sacrifice of lower battery life, Undervolting improves battery life potentially at the cost of processor speed. The proper combination of the two can give you a faster phone with the same or even improved battery life. (very basic explanation i know)
Using setcpu, correct?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
thachosenone said:
Using setcpu, correct?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
shreddintyres said:
Basically Overclocking makes the phone faster at the sacrifice of lower battery life, Undervolting improves battery life potentially at the cost of processor speed. The proper combination of the two can give you a faster phone with the same or even improved battery life. (very basic explanation i know)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think under volting has anything to do with processor speed. I've under volted quite a bit before with no drop in linpack or quadrant scores. If you drop the voltage too low it will cause the cpu to freeze though.
Related
I'm just curious. A lot of the overclock kernels are also listed as UV. I'm assuming that it means undervolt.
What does that do? Is it a battery thing?
Thanks.
That's what I think to, maybe a little Google could help lol
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
uses less power than stock kernal for said cpu setting. less power draw = longer lasting battery.
da_dragon2k3 said:
uses less power than stock kernal for said cpu setting. less power draw = longer lasting battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would that help overclocking?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
UV mean under-volting. And yes, it does help save on battery when overclocking.
This may be a dumb question but has underclocking a CPU been shown to damage it at all? Be it longterm or short? I know excessive overclocking can take it's toll on the life of a processor and was just wondering if the opposite was true also.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Well I'll answer with my common sense: I don't see a negative effect on the chip. Underclocking too much could effect your performance and might cause reboots. Best way to go about it is trial and error. Find a stable setting and go from there.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
radrian92 said:
Well I'll answer with my common sense: I don't see a negative effect on the chip. Underclocking too much could effect your performance and might cause reboots. Best way to go about it is trial and error. Find a stable setting and go from there.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not asking about stability...I'm asking about actual damage. I'm aware of what underclocking does to phone performanne. I'm asking if someone knows either from experience or from information available somewhere if it can physically damage the processor...not just an assumption...but thank you anyhow.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Underclocking does not damage anything hardware wise. In fact all recent processors do it very often for energy efficiency reasons. Your phone its probably doing it right now. It will go to its stock rated speed (1 GHz for photon) when you run a game or something else system intensive and it will clock back down to 216 GHz (lowest stock rated speed) when you quit or anywhere imbetween depending on load.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
EDIT: Meant 216 MHz. Sorry.
MultiDev said:
Underclocking does not damage anything hardware wise. In fact all recent processors do it very often for energy efficiency reasons. Your phone its probably doing it right now. It will go to its stock rated speed (1 GHz for photon) when you run a game or something else system intensive and it will clock back down to 216 GHz (lowest stock rated speed) when you quit or anywhere imbetween depending on load.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy crud, 216 ghz????
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
You cant underclock below what it was designed for and my regular kernels keep voltage below safe values so.....
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
MultiDev said:
Underclocking does not damage anything hardware wise. In fact all recent processors do it very often for energy efficiency reasons. Your phone its probably doing it right now. It will go to its stock rated speed (1 GHz for photon) when you run a game or something else system intensive and it will clock back down to 216 GHz (lowest stock rated speed) when you quit or anywhere imbetween depending on load.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now this makes sense...thank you.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
magui43212 said:
Holy crud, 216 ghz????
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its 216 Mhz...lol
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Yeah it shouldn't really have to much of an effect seeing as you are basically allowing it to do less. Just as long as you are not running to much for it to handle at its underclocked speed.... In theory at least.
I run both OC and UC setups depending upon what I'm doing IE "Charging" or "Screen off". And I've yet to see any negative effects.
Well seeing uderclocking makes it so its "walking" instead of "running" so it should be able to keep its "breath" longer.. less stress does usally me longer life. So i would say it helps your phone life overall and battery life longer overall
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
No its like running with less weight
Damanis1 said:
Well seeing uderclocking makes it so its "walking" instead of "running" so it should be able to keep its "breath" longer.. less stress does usally me longer life. So i would say it helps your phone life overall and battery life longer overall
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Would I get better speed if I disabled 1ghz frequency and left 1.2ghz the default Max frequency?
Would it be faster?
Or slower? Or nothing?
Don't like the 1ghz frequency. But I notice my phone is a little slower when disabling. It.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
I thought you were making a kernel with 1.9 ghz overclock? That should be fast enough
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Appl
Kidding, correct?
1.2 > 1.0
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
Good to see enyo has found where he belongs in xda. Asking questions and learning.
This is a big improvement enyo.
as to 1.2 feeling slower, your putting a massive undervolt on it. Try backing it off a bit and see if responsiveness comes back. Also, higher clock speeds can lead to better battery in theory by completing tasks faster and allowing the CPU to govern back down to a idle state.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
neh4pres said:
Good to see enyo has found where he belongs in xda. Asking questions and learning.
This is a big improvement enyo.
as to 1.2 feeling slower, your putting a massive undervolt on it. Try backing it off a bit and see if responsiveness comes back. Also, higher clock speeds can lead to better battery in theory by completing tasks faster and allowing the CPU to govern back down to a idle state.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. Your right. Backed to -75mV on 1.2ghz and faster response came back.
Also it because really fast after switching to the Medium Leakage.
I rarely let my phone sleep, so 1.2 is the maximum I'll go for speed/battery.
But, the more you UV, you get laggy if its too low, but stable?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Enyo. said:
Thanks. Your right. Backed to -75mV on 1.2ghz and faster response came back.
Also it because really fast after switching to the Medium Leakage.
I rarely let my phone sleep, so 1.2 is the maximum I'll go for speed/battery.
But, the more you UV, you get laggy if its too low, but stable?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly -50uv across the board yields the best performance, battery life and reliability.
droidstyle said:
Honestly -50uv across the board yields the best performance, battery life and reliability.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there a advantage if it's undervolted 100+ mV?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Enyo. said:
Is there a advantage if it's undervolted 100+ mV?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that would be called overvolting... yes performance may increase, but inturn added heat, less battery life and instability can occur with it.
droidstyle said:
that would be called overvolting... yes performance may increase, but inturn added heat, less battery life and instability can occur with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So -50mV is just enough?
I'll do that. Your good with setups of oc/uv.
Seems really stable for me.
Trying Low leakage for better battery. But Medium is perfect right
Now.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
droidstyle said:
that would be called overvolting... yes performance may increase, but inturn added heat, less battery life and instability can occur with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just tried your setup. And I didn't know how slow my phone was till I used yours. So undervolting to much does slow down your phone. And it Got hot out of no where.
Thanks
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
What does under volting do? And what happens if I do it? And what's the right amount to under volt?
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
kevinrubio1 said:
What does under volting do? And what happens if I do it? And what's the right amount to under volt?
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Undervolting reduces the amount of power the cpu uses, this helps to increase your battery life basically. How to do it? Depends on your kernel/rom, if they have the option, some kernels will require a special app, custom kernels can pretty much use any app that controls the cpu, you can start by reducing the voltage by -25mv, see how stable the device is, if it doesn't reboot, etc. If it does crash and reboot, you know that's 25mv below your processors limit.
I'm just curious to see everyone's experience with the Faux kernel as opposed to the one that comes pre-installed.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
Capgun_Homicide said:
I'm just curious to see everyone's experience with the Faux kernel as opposed to the one that comes pre-installed.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to read xda rules again.. Your free to use both of them and see it for your self without asking which is best in public!!
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda premium
Capgun_Homicide said:
I'm just curious to see everyone's experience with the Faux kernel as opposed to the one that comes pre-installed.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think they're both great you can't go wrong with either kernel. It's like choosing a lamborgini or ferrari, they're both awesome but it truly comes down to preference.
I think I got better battery with faux 31 but I under clocked and undervolted so I can't do a fair battery life test.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using Tapatalk 2
SuperAfnan said:
I think they're both great you can't go wrong with either kernel. It's like choosing a lamborgini or ferrari, they're both awesome but it truly comes down to preference.
I think I got better battery with faux 31 but I under clocked and undervolted so I can't do a fair battery life test.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've noticed better battery life as well; not majorly, but noticeably. Although I feel it also has a little perfomance drop. Could just be me, though.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
Sorry for a question within a question, but what does undervolting/overvolting do? I've only ever tampered with MHz frequencies.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
Capgun_Homicide said:
Sorry for a question within a question, but what does undervolting/overvolting do? I've only ever tampered with MHz frequencies.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't worry.
Undervolting is basically adjusting the voltages so the cpu uses less voltage aka electricity. It helps a little but it can make your phone unstable so watch out. Of you undervolt use the system tuner app on the market. You should definitely under clock if you want to save power too. When you undervolt be sure to underclock, and don't do it too low or your phone might freeze! That's why your shouldn't go so extreme on it.
Overvolting is basically adding more voltage to the cpu. There is no point in doing it for our amazes to be honest. It is already a battery hog. I guess it can help if you want to over clock a lot but there is absolutely no point in doing that.
In older legacy phones if you wanted to over clock because the cpu would be so weak, like 600mhz then you would have to overvolt to over clock to like 1ghz if you were lucky. Our devices are 1.5 ghz dual core and sense isn't THAT bad. There's no point in doing overvolt in this phone though.
PS, check out my rom in the development section.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using Tapatalk 2
SuperAfnan said:
Don't worry.
Undervolting is basically adjusting the voltages so the cpu uses less voltage aka electricity. It helps a little but it can make your phone unstable so watch out. Of you undervolt use the system tuner app on the market. You should definitely under clock if you want to save power too. When you undervolt be sure to underclock, and don't do it too low or your phone might freeze! That's why your shouldn't go so extreme on it.
Overvolting is basically adding more voltage to the cpu. There is no point in doing it for our amazes to be honest. It is already a battery hog. I guess it can help if you want to over clock a lot but there is absolutely no point in doing that.
In older legacy phones if you wanted to over clock because the cpu would be so weak, like 600mhz then you would have to overvolt to over clock to like 1ghz if you were lucky. Our devices are 1.5 ghz dual core and sense isn't THAT bad. There's no point in doing overvolt in this phone though.
PS, check out my rom in the development section.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just saw it in Venom Tweaks and was curious. The most I underclock to is 1 GHz; cuts down the CPU maximum by a third and doesn't hinder performance to much. What voltage would you recommend at that clock speed?
P.S. I have I plan on flashing it to try it out when I get WiFi access. Trying to cut down data usage since I don't have WiFi at home.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
Capgun_Homicide said:
I just saw it in Venom Tweaks and was curious. The most I underclock to is 1 GHz; cuts down the CPU maximum by a third and doesn't hinder performance to much. What voltage would you recommend at that clock speed?
P.S. I have I plan on flashing it to try it out when I get WiFi access. Trying to cut down data usage since I don't have WiFi at home.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1ghz is perfect. As for voltage it really varies but I subtract 75 or 50 mv from all voltages.
PS. Oh nice, hope you get wifi soon then.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using Tapatalk 2