Why is the touch so slow on my x10? When im using an Samsung Galaxy S or even an HTC Wildfire the touch response is very good, for example when i drag down the status bar it follows my finger perfectly. But when I drag down the status bar with my x10 it rolls down after my finger. Iv'e installed alot of roms, but none of them makes the response faster. Is there anyway I can fix this?
Im on an pretty old baseband, can it be that?
a1exander said:
Why is the touch so slow on my x10? When im using an Samsung Galaxy S or even an HTC Wildfire the touch response is very good, for example when i drag down the status bar it follows my finger perfectly. But when I drag down the status bar with my x10 it rolls down after my finger. Iv'e installed alot of roms, but none of them makes the response faster. Is there anyway I can fix this?
Im on an pretty old baseband, can it be that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the 32fps cap doing it's thing. There's not much you can do about it right now, unless you wan't to try zdzihu's alpha-kernel, but it has it's problems and I'd rather wait for a properly tested and supported kernel instead.
add this to your build prop
windowsmgr.max_events_per_sec=260
I'm also aware that..I've tried freekernel but it is still the same..it is not so responsive..for me iphone has the best responsive..
eureka9092000 said:
I'm also aware that..I've tried freekernel but it is still the same..it is not so responsive..for me iphone has the best responsive..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean freekernel as in the one jerpelea cooked, or the alpha-kernel as in the first kernel that was released for use to the community? Because the freekernel doesn't unlock the FPS while the alpha-kernel does.
ooidort said:
You mean freekernel as in the one jerpelea cooked, or the alpha-kernel as in the first kernel that was released for use to the community? Because the freekernel doesn't unlock the FPS while the alpha-kernel does.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The custom kernel released by zdzihu..not by jerpelea..
Whats the downside with that kernel? Link?
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using XDA App
a1exander said:
Whats the downside with that kernel? Link?
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It just can be used with baseband .52,and bb .52 is not supported by 2.2 rom..if I not mistake usb debugging is not working and many more probs,that why it is call alpha-kernel..Maybe it take weeks or months before our devs can make it stable and support all baseband versions..
a1exander said:
Whats the downside with that kernel? Link?
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the links:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1027111
Okay! Will the build prop thing work on tripnmiui?
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using XDA App
a1exander said:
Okay! Will the build prop thing work on tripnmiui?
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes works on any rom...
Greatly improves touch tracking
fiscidtox said:
yes works on any rom...
Greatly improves touch tracking
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then why doesnt trip do it in Tripnmiui as standard? Or is it there already?
a1exander said:
Then why doesnt trip do it in Tripnmiui as standard? Or is it there already?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope you have to add it.
I dunno since when was a dev jesus? Maybe he doesn't know about it?
Im currently using trips miui with the custom kernel and I must say that finger tracking is HUGELY improved. It may no be up to par with the galaxy s or iphone but its much much better
dforesi said:
Im currently using trips miui with the custom kernel and I must say that finger tracking is HUGELY improved. It may no be up to par with the galaxy s or iphone but its much much better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's just as good as either now to tell you the truth...
so much better than it was
fiscidtox said:
yes works on any rom...
Greatly improves touch tracking
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's already included on Wolfbreak's CM 6.1.3 V05.
I just went to add it, but it was already there.
agentJBM said:
It's already included on Wolfbreak's CM 6.1.3 V05.
I just went to add it, but it was already there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah he does add it!! he's the only dev who does though
With trips miui rom the response is ALOT faster gr8 work trip!
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using XDA App
fiscidtox said:
add this to your build prop
windowsmgr.max_events_per_sec=260
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, that works great!
Sent from my SE_X10a using XDA App
it seems that the x10 should at least be more responsive than the iphone 3gs due to the better hardware etc... well the future looks bright for the x10 anyways, can only wait
Related
is it? can anyone create a short video of whats new, how much it is smoother ect. thanks
No! If you would read you would see its not a complete kernel its nothing more than a proof of concept. Z's announcement was meant for developers to know he had accomplished the bypass and would be providing source for custom kernels. The current kernel will never be developed or supported. There is absolutely no reason for 99% of the people here to flash this kernel.
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
As of now, I don't think it's a good idea.
Just wait patiently for devs to do their work.
I don't think the wait will be long
Things sure changed fast in the X10 development in the last few weeks.
It's a good idea xD
It's nice and smooth...
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
Flo95 said:
It's a good idea xD
It's nice and smooth...
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed it works. Well for daily use
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Backup you're current ROM and try flashing it. I tried it on 2.1 and 2.2 but on wrong bb. For the few seconds it worked (before it restarted) i was amazed at how much more responsive it was. Back to SE kernel for now. If was on the right bb i would gladly use it as a daily rom.
Flash the right bb, it's worth it
Nah, I think I keep my 2.2 until SE releases Gingerbread.
Flash-support and JIT really makes my phone smooth even if its still locked in FPS.
But it will be really interesting to see what the devs can do with custom kernels.
I can't even think of going back to the fps capped froyo roms now. Its just so smooth. Like a new phone.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
too early, imo.
a.monteiro said:
too early, imo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's worth it. But hopefully it will get better with 2.3 kernels!
does camera and video recorder work on the new kernal?
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
its well worth it! everything is so fast and smooth espesiaclly launcher pros scrolling between homepages. i have had no problems with this custom kernal at all so i think its fir for daily use.
I have always been confused by members who complain about the official SE firmware and the SE devs being completely incompetent and slow, when all of the custom ROMs have insufficiencies of their own and the devs are considered Gods. Especially, when our devs haven't brought us any of the major implementations themselves, like fully functional camera, 60 fps cap, 16mil colors, or multitouch.
No offense to our devs, because they have limitations by bootloader, but the problem isn't just bootloader, it's having someone who can create all the drivers, which was the case before bypass.
What is important to you? Fully functional or speed? Which bugs are major? A little lag on timescape or rebooting, or a touchscreen that freezes or becomes partially unresponsive?
agentJBM said:
I have always been confused by members who complain about the official SE firmware and the SE devs being completely incompetent and slow, when all of the custom ROMs have insufficiencies of their own and the devs are considered Gods. Especially, when our devs haven't brought us any of the major implementations themselves, like fully functional camera, 60 fps cap, 16mil colors, or multitouch.
No offense to our devs, because they have limitations by bootloader, but the problem isn't just bootloader, it's having someone who can create all the drivers, which was the case before bypass.
What is important to you? Fully functional or speed? Which bugs are major? A little lag on timescape or rebooting, or a touchscreen that freezes or becomes partially unresponsive?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Repost in general discussion i think it would be more usefull there
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
rtblittlebrown said:
Repost in general discussion i think it would be more usefull there
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a Question, dumby. How about an actual opinion rather than playing moderator?
Many people have questions about the differences between custom ROMs and official firmware.
What about fully functional AND fast? try wolfbreak's rom
Jokes aside, remember that SE gave up on x10 updates before going back on their decision and giving us gingerbread. And honestly, only the 2.3 custom roms don't have fully working cameras, Froyo is pretty much complete and has been my daily rom for many months now, i can't thank SE for that.
agentJBM said:
It's a Question, dumby. How about an actual opinion rather than playing moderator?
Many people have questions about the differences between custom ROMs and official firmware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay chill out a lot of things in general section are questions not trying to “play moderator“ more people look in general discussion anyways.Just tryin to help out
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
a.monteiro said:
What about fully functional AND fast? try wolfbreak's rom
Jokes aside, remember that SE gave up on x10 updates before going back on their decision and giving us gingerbread. And honestly, only the 2.3 custom roms don't have fully working cameras, Froyo is pretty much complete and has been my daily rom for many months now, i can't thank SE for that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My confusion continues.....
There are ZERO 2.2+ ROMS that are fully functional. PERIOD.
Why do xda fanboys seem to think different?
If SE released a ROM that didn't have a fully functional camera, xda members would lose it.
agentJBM said:
My confusion continues.....
There are ZERO 2.2+ ROMS that are fully functional. PERIOD.
Why do xda fanboys seem to think different?
If SE released a ROM that didn't have a fully functional camera, xda members would lose it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2,2 roms dont have camera zoom ooooh big deal
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
rtblittlebrown said:
2,2 roms dont have camera zoom ooooh big deal
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct flash, zoom, or audio recording.
Official firmware only has lag on certain stock apps like Timescape or Face Recognition. Oh big deal.
Is 60 fps cap, 16mil colors, or multitouch a big deal? Not Really. It doesn't make our phones more usefull.
agentJBM said:
Correct flash, zoom, or audio recording.
Official firmware only has lag on certain stock apps like Timescape or Face Recognition. Oh big deal.
Is 60 fps cap, 16mil colors, or multitouch a big deal? Not Really. It doesn't make our phones more usefull.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Multitouch does
You can record audio on a lot of 2.2
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
rtblittlebrown said:
Multitouch does
You can record audio on a lot of 2.2
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, it is not fully functional or not working. You are the "perfect" example of xda dev "Immortality".
agentJBM said:
Correct flash, zoom, or audio recording.
Official firmware only has lag on certain stock apps like Timescape or Face Recognition. Oh big deal.
Is 60 fps cap, 16mil colors, or multitouch a big deal? Not Really. It doesn't make our phones more usefull.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know what your going to say to me, your thinking I'm jumping down your throat etc but you've answered your own question there. Repair with seus then root and optimise with flashtool. That way your phone will be fully functional and fast with the benefits from JIT etc. Hope this helps out
Edit,
Why not try out ericks 2.1 rom which is extremely fast, like gingerbread speeds and literally everything works. Want teether then grab barnacle for free off the market. This rom has been my daily for perhaps a week or two at a guess but you won't be disappointed with broken features etc. Trust me really worth a shot trying it out
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
The Gingerbread Man said:
I know what your going to say to me, your thinking I'm jumping down your throat etc but you've answered your own question there. Repair with seus then root and optimise with flashtool. That way your phone will be fully functional and fast with the benefits from JIT etc. Hope this helps out
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely not, this is about the differences between firmware and custom ROMs. We already know the differences. I just wanted to know who is a bigger majority...fully functional vs custom ROMs.
If you or any other moron suggests that speed is the number one customer concern of software, you are STUPID.
agentJBM said:
Absolutely not, this is about the differences between firmware and custom ROMs. We already know the differences. I just wanted to know who is a bigger majority...fully functional vs custom ROMs.
If you or any other moron suggests that speed is the number one customer concern of software, you are STUPID.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here I say you can have both, full functionality and speed. I edited my previous post, check over that last bit I added. Oh btw really I'm not here to make arguments etc with you just purely to offer a little advice man. Peace, no need to call me stupid etc lol
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
A suggestion, if your trying to find majority between custom rom and official why not call your thread 'custom roms VS stock, votes please' or something
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
The Gingerbread Man said:
Here I say you can have both, full functionality and speed. The I edited my previous post, check that last bit I added over. Oh btw really I'm not here to make arguments etc with you just purely to offer a little advice man. Peace, no need to call me stupid etc lol
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NAME ONE ROM THAT IS FULLY FUNCTIONAL, and a fast Custom ROM at same time. You are a liar.
The Gingerbread Man said:
A suggestion, if your trying to find majority between custom rom and official why not call your thread 'custom roms VS stock, votes please' or something
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not about the differences between versions. It's about camera vs load speed.
agentJBM said:
NAME ONE ROM THAT IS FULLY FUNCTIONAL, and a fast Custom ROM at same time. You are a liar.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, check here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=941745 fully functional and possibly the fastest rom out there. Camera and video recording work 100% perfect. It's a custom rom, it all works, its fast and i wish you try it out before accusing me of being a liar.
Edit
My daily choose of rom for about 2 weeks, i left cm7 for this
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
The reason Erick's rom is so speedy is that many features(which most people do not use) are disabled. Once you add them on again, the speed is comparable to stock firmware. I would say that is the closest 'custom rom' to being fully functional.
All the 2.2+ roms, while very nice and speedy, often have things that don't work.. like camera, and all of them suffer from poor battery life. A big gripe for me is the wifi disconnect issue with all 2.2 and above custom roms. I find it hard to believe that most people would prefer speed over functionality.
I've tried most of the roms out there in my year with the x10, and I always found myself coming back to stock.
And now with the arc, I don't have a choice There are no custom roms for bootloader locked arcs
pngface said:
The reason Erick's rom is so speedy is that many features(which most people do not use) are disabled. Once you add them on again, the speed is comparable to stock firmware. I would say that is the closest 'custom rom' to being fully functional.
All the 2.2+ roms, while very nice and speedy, often have things that don't work.. like camera, and all of them suffer from poor battery life. A big gripe for me is the wifi disconnect issue with all 2.2 and above custom roms. I find it hard to believe that most people would prefer speed over functionality.
I've tried most of the roms out there in my year with the x10, and I always found myself coming back to stock.
And now with the arc, I don't have a choice There are no custom roms for bootloader locked arcs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dunno man, iv been running it in a few different versions over last couple of weeks and if you apply all extras like me id still say much faster than stock.
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
agentJBM said:
It's not about the differences between versions. It's about camera vs load speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see either camera or load speed in your title for this thread.
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
most of people said,milk's cm7 rom definitely over modded gingerbread 2.3.3, actually what is the real diffirence between it?
is only different between battery n quadrant score?
actually the quadrant score gt affect the phone performance?
Official GB ROM is bugless and with better battery life..
mik's CM7 has some bugs, but its performance is incredible! it's amazingly smooth (it's the smoothest ROM I have ever used).
You can try to flash both of them and choose, which one is better for you..
Currently I'm waiting for andy's new ROM. I think, it'll be a bomb..
GL.
His nick is not milk, it is mik.
droidaem said:
Official GB ROM is bugless
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not really..
it has ugly icons in status-bar (not in same line), animation bug??? and slow USB-transfer, some people have problems with proximity sensor ...
rockvoid said:
not really..
it has ugly icons in status-bar (not in same line), animation bug??? and slow USB-transfer, some people have problems with proximity sensor ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In v20c update, icons in notification bar are fixed..
For me USB transfering is like in other ROMs, also proximity sensor is working..
But, after some using I have to reboot the phone because it usually becomes slower (scrolling is laggin').. With CM7 I didn't have this problem.
Oh, and what's the animation bug?
droidaem said:
In v20c update, icons in notification bar are fixed..
For me USB transfering is like in other ROMs, also proximity sensor is working..
But, after some using I have to reboot the phone because it usually becomes slower (scrolling is laggin').. With CM7 I didn't have this problem.
Oh, and what's the animation bug?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they say that sensor is not working:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1179607
yasingedik said:
His nick is not milk, it is mik.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah +1
Sent from my LG Optimus One P500 using XDA App
milk is not a bad word, so its ok and mik wont mind it...
I'm also debating whether to upgrade to GB ROM. hmm
I hope the new ROM to include support for the new baseband.
ccdreadcc said:
milk is not a bad word, so its ok and mik wont mind it...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe he should sell a shirt with an Android on it and "Got Mik?"
fratermus said:
Maybe he should sell a shirt with an Android on it and "Got Mik?"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe not cuz now is MIA... Dunno wen he continues it...
Sent from my LG P500 with Franco 2.6.35.13 v1 (12 July) using Xda premium app
tried miks cyanogen port 6.6 today and went back to gingerlol. it has less bugs and i personally prefer more or less stock gingerbread over cm. i dont want to play around as much with my phone as cm allows me to so i am happy with 2.3.3. i dont care about benchmarks but i also have to say that miks rom is definately smoother. just try both and decide which one you like better. it is a matter of taste imo.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
Hiya! Okay, I'm quite experienced with Android now, and I know this is a noobs question, and possibly frowned upon, but I was wondering what the best Kernel and ROM for my X10 is?
I previously used an X8 with CM7 (2.3.4) v.138 HACKDROID, and I pretty much want the same awesomeness on my X10 but better. There are a load here, and the Master Thread doesn't have any recommendations like the X8 Master Thread (which recommends HACKDROID).
I just need a few pointers and I won't post a noob question again. This is all I pretty much need to know.
Thanks
DM
If your into Cyanogen, check out CM7-ZMOD, butter smooth. If you want a more Sony Ericsson feel, check out Wolfs 2.3.3 rom. Again, butter smooth.
There is not really any kernel options at the moment. SE hasn't released the sources yet.
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
Thanks. Yeah, its just like Hackdroid I found a 'Power to The People' Kernel by DoomLord, but it seems to turn off my signal, wifi and the USB cannot be recognised at all?
Only two quams with the ROM is lack of Governers - Not unless this Smartass one is good enough?? And the Volume in general is far too low.
Wish there was a Kernel to improve the ability even further. It's got the potential.
if you want a fast, reliable rom then j's cm7 j004 with doomlord's custom kernel can't be beat. until se release sources for gingerbread. this is the best custom setup around... in my opinion...
Delusphere said:
Thanks. Yeah, its just like Hackdroid I found a 'Power to The People' Kernel by DoomLord, but it seems to turn off my signal, wifi and the USB cannot be recognised at all?
Only two quams with the ROM is lack of Governers - Not unless this Smartass one is good enough?? And the Volume in general is far too low.
Wish there was a Kernel to improve the ability even further. It's got the potential.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ditto. can't wait for se to release sources! then game on!!
kemmo123 said:
ditto. can't wait for se to release sources! then game on!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When will they release sources?
kantk20111 said:
When will they release sources?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Under the GPL, I believe they must be released within 15 days of launch. I'm no expert though so don't quote me.
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
Frosty666 said:
Under the GPL, I believe they must be released within 15 days of launch. I'm no expert though so don't quote me.
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In which part of GPL says that?
kantk20111 said:
When will they release sources?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd like to know why they are holding them back....
SE does so much slimy stuff
Hzu said:
In which part of GPL says that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I stated, I'm no expert, in fact, I could even be completely incorrect. I have however read other peoples responses to similar questions about SE releasing their kernel sources. They state that the Linux kernel sources, which are licenced under the GPL, must be disclosed within a certain period of time, which I believe to be 15 days.
Apologies for my somewhat limited knowledge about such licenses.
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
No worries, I just want a confirmation. I've never heard such rule in GPL(confuses me a lot since there are variants of GPL out there).
I prefer this ROM, I'm still playing around with different one's.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1192326
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
May I ask a noob question what difference does different kernals actually do
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
Frosty666 said:
If your into Cyanogen, check out CM7-ZMOD, butter smooth. If you want a more Sony Ericsson feel, check out Wolfs 2.3.3 rom. Again, butter smooth.
There is not really any kernel options at the moment. SE hasn't released the sources yet.
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even the new Achotjan CM7 released... Just checked it now. Looks pretty awesome. I'd say try ZMOD one or The Achotjan CM7 if you are a Cynogen fan. I was using Wolf's 2.3.3 for almost two weeks now and I'd say thats the best if you dont want to use Cynogen ROM... Cheers
I'm going to give Wolf's a shot, but I really enjoyed ZMOD's, but it could be better. The HTC Mod keyboard doesn't work on it sadly. I've just resorted to using thumb keyboard, its pretty good actually
Went back to ZMOD. It's amazing. Plus, the new kernels are making it a better experience now. Its running like lightning now. And the battery has improved too. Doomlords kernel is amazing
DM
hi, I'm on wolf's 2.3 rom. I wanna update to v4, and update 4.0.3 is also avail, so is it mandatory to update kernel as well? do i need to wipe anything before flashing to v4?
jaddadial said:
hi, I'm on wolf's 2.3 rom. I wanna update to v4, and update 4.0.3 is also avail, so is it mandatory to update kernel as well? do i need to wipe anything before flashing to v4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No you don't have to update your kernel, and no you don't have to wipe anything. The custom kernel is optional. I'm using stock kernel on 4.0.2.1 and its extremely snappy. I'm going to update to 4.0.3 tonight.
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
I'm running Wolf's 4.0.3 with Stock Kernel and Undervolt Addon, running very smoothly. Juice plotter tells me 51 hours of battery after calibration and a two days running. Best ROM I've used!
I know this thread is old , but since now there are new kernels to choose from, there are certainly new answers for this thread...
So, what's the best ROM / kernel combo for you guys?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-20124966-266/will-my-android-get-ice-cream-sandwich-ask-maggie/
according to this article there is no specific req... for ics..but it also says that older devices will not run it smoothly....my question is that is our device too old to run ics?? i think we have a fairly decent cpu nd gpu only prob is that our ram is low....
lijinc said:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-20124966-266/will-my-android-get-ice-cream-sandwich-ask-maggie/
according to this article there is no specific req... for ics..but it also says that older devices will not run it smoothly....my question is that is our device too old to run ics?? i think we have a fairly decent cpu nd gpu only prob is that our ram is low....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not compatible
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=18811839&postcount=173
I disagree with that. Obviously there won't be any official rom for ICS but I'd bet that custom CM roms will be available for this arch. Its only a matter of how smooth and complete they will be. And yea, that is if anyone is left to work on this arch.
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App
nobodyAtall said:
I disagree with that. Obviously there won't be any official rom for ICS but I'd bet that custom CM roms will be available for this arch. Its only a matter of how smooth and complete they will be. And yea, that is if anyone is left to work on this arch.
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have much reason nobodyatall but thanks to your wonderful work our minis have been the best and expecting the prompt updating of minicm7 I'm sure will be the official greetings support your work.
I think if CM gets ready, nAa will be able to make a miniCM
and ur minis are the best smartphones ever XD fun XD
but there good
Why all want 4.0? just because of the number?
we dont even have a extra front cam to use face unlock from ICS, is ridiculous -
I love my mini with MiniCM 2.1.3 Thanks to nAa!
sorry for my bad english
ChavitoArg said:
Why all want 4.0? just because of the number?
we dont even have a extra front cam to use face unlock from ICS, is ridiculous -
I love my mini with MiniCM 2.1.3 Thanks to nAa!
sorry for my bad english
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed I think the devs should just make gingerbread into perfection wether its minicm or gingerdx the time will come when ics will be ready to port
sent from my x10mini with minicm7 nAa kernal v5 supercharged using XDA App
if ics is not compatible with our devices then some of the dev's can try to add some new features into their existing rom's.
like the new single shot 3D panorama..
sunil.s125 said:
if ics is not compatible with our devices then some of the dev's can try to add some new features into their existing rom's.
like the new single shot 3D panorama..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Brilliant idea and 3d panoramic sounds slick
sent from my x10mini with minicm7 nAa kernal v5 supercharged using XDA App