In canada how much is the laptop dock and how much is the other dock. Also what is included in the other dock.
Do I need a separate plan and all that for the laptop dock like on AT&T.
Thanks
Check out the Bell's site on the Atrix:
Multi Media Desk Dock $49.95
Vehicle Dock $59.95
HD Multimedia Dock $129.95
MOTOROLA LAPDOCK™ $329.95
And no, Bell doesn't have a tethering plan like AT&T. Tethering comes with your data plan.
Are you planning to switch from Rogers to Bell? I'm not sure if it Bell will do it again any time soon but couple of weeks ago, the Atrix was priced at $69.95. It's currently $99.95 on a 3 years contract right now.
Alright thanks. Do you have an Atrix on Rogers?
Is everything working great? anything I should look out for?
RacecarBMW said:
Alright thanks. Do you have an Atrix on Rogers?
Is everything working great? anything I should look out for?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oui, if you're using it on Rogers, the caller display of the the caller ID must be disabled by calling Rogers. If you don't, calls that are from landlines and numbers not on your contact list are shown as 'Payphone' and you are unable to call them back. Once disabled, you will still see the names of ppl that are on your contact list and only numbers if they are not.
-Roze- said:
Oui, if you're using it on Rogers, the caller display of the the caller ID must be disabled by calling Rogers. If you don't, calls that are from landlines and numbers not on your contact list are shown as 'Payphone' and you are unable to call them back. Once disabled, you will still see the names of ppl that are on your contact list and only numbers if they are not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What if someone calls me from a landline phone and I have him as one of my contacts. Will his name show up because I have him as a contact?
RacecarBMW said:
What if someone calls me from a landline phone and I have him as one of my contacts. Will his name show up because I have him as a contact?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes [10char...]
-Roze- said:
Yes [10char...]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even if I didn't disable caller display?
RacecarBMW said:
Even if I didn't disable caller display?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, you need your caller display to be disabled. Any calls from landline even on your contact list will be shown as 'PAY PHONE'.
-Roze- said:
No, you need your caller display to be disabled. Any calls from landline even on your contact list will be shown as 'PAY PHONE'.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok thank you.
Do you know if this will be fixed in the future or does Motorola not care because we are unlocked.
You don't disable call display you just ask them to omit name display and then your caller ID will function normally.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
evenstarr said:
You don't disable call display you just ask them to omit name display and then your caller ID will function normally.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Opps, is it called name display? XD The Rogers guy understood me though
-Roze- said:
Opps, is it called name display? XD The Rogers guy understood me though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, it's caller name display that needs to be disabled. the Rogers tech guys know all about this issue and will disable it without any problems.
Will a USB keyboard work with HD multimedia dock?
Related
OK, I got a real nice surprise today when I saw in my phone bill that i had been dialing internationally through my wireless provider even though "google voice" would pop up on my phone since it is set to be used for ALL international calls. I now set it to ask before dialing, but I go check my call history in google voice and I have no calls made... WTF????
same
I had the same problem with $160 surprise bill.
Thank you very much!
It seems that the calls dialed out are just not going out through GV - regardless if they were local or international.
I called a friend's phone from my GV and my regular cell number shows despite asking it to dial all calls. While the phone shows that google voice is dialing out, it's just your phone dialing.
WTF, stuck with a very high bill now. Who is to blame? SE, ATT, GV?
I am out of the country at the moment and cannot check but I saww Google voice was updated, maybe it works after this update.
loony33 said:
WTF, stuck with a very high bill now. Who is to blame? SE, ATT, GV?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately you. The best way to ensure gv is being used is to make calls from the browser. I have had ongoing problems with the app.
Instead I created an icon on my nineteen with gv as the bookmark. When I hit it, it goes straight to the gv call screen. It ain't pretty but it works.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
gavriel18 said:
Unfortunately you. The best way to ensure gv is being used is to make calls from the browser. I have had ongoing problems with the app.
Instead I created an icon on my nineteen with gv as the bookmark. When I hit it, it goes straight to the gv call screen. It ain't pretty but it works.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is a snarky answer. I never ever had a problem with GV on 1.6 from March to October of this year, and from what I read it was even more integrated in 2.1, why would I assume a Google App would not work properly when it pops up when I make an international call? Thank you for the workaround though.
Sorry, I didn't mean for it to come across that way :-( .
I agree I did expect the same as you. When I got stung it was around $300 more than my bill normally was. Calling my buddy in Cali at 35 cents a minute flat!
The only way I have found to be sure is the browser way and only because you are receiving a call. IMO gv should have some sort of pre-ring notification to verify it's operating.
I'm running an unlocked and rooted Atrix on Fido in Canada and have noticed a peculiar problem. Whenever a call is made to me from my landline at home, the Caller ID displays "Pay Phone" instead of the contact associated with that number. This does not happen with my wifes iPhone or my old HTC Desire HD. Other landline numbers show up properly, but this (and one other number) keep showing up as "Pay Phone". I've tried removing the number from the associated contact, but it keeps showing up as "Pay Phone".
Anyone else seen this with their Atrix? Any helpful suggestions?
Cause Determined: See this post for more details:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=11726211&postcount=6
Installed TrueCaller on my Atrix - this does report the number correctly but the font is pretty small and not too readable.
It seems like the number is being transmitted, but the stock caller ID app has a bug that causes it to display "Pay Phone". Looking around on the web shows it may be a Rogers/Fido network - Stock caller ID app issue that may be the root of the problem.
If anyone is on the Fido/Rogers network, are you seeing this sort of behaviour on your Atrix?
I'll be able to let you know later in the week. I should have mine on Rogers by mid-week.
rajeshr said:
Installed TrueCaller on my Atrix - this does report the number correctly but the font is pretty small and not too readable.
It seems like the number is being transmitted, but the stock caller ID app has a bug that causes it to display "Pay Phone". Looking around on the web shows it may be a Rogers/Fido network - Stock caller ID app issue that may be the root of the problem.
If anyone is on the Fido/Rogers network, are you seeing this sort of behaviour on your Atrix?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for using TrueCaller!
/Team TC
This happened to me earlier today. I'm on Rogers.
Caller called from north on Mississauga road - a business (I was expecting it). Big office, many trunks in the building. I've never had it display as PAY PHONE before though today it did.
This isn't happening from all calls, just this one so far.
I think the Motorola support folks have found the root of the problem. It looks like there is a bug in the Atrix Dialer app that makes it behave incorrectly and display "Pay Phone" without the number if you have Caller ID with Name Display enabled with your carrier.
Rogers(and Fido) is the only North American carrier (I think) that has the option to give you the Name Display along with Caller ID. The fix for now is to get Rogers/Fido to enable Basic Caller ID (without Name Display) and then the numbers will start showing up. It sucks to lose Name Display and I hope the Motorola development team will have a fix for it at some point.
BTW, this will affect any carrier worldwide that has the Name Display option with Caller ID.
FYI - here's a thread I've had going on the Motorola Support forums.
https://supportforums.motorola.com/thread/45848?tstart=0https://supportforums.motorola.com/thread/45848?tstart=0
mister_al said:
This happened to me earlier today. I'm on Rogers.
Caller called from north on Mississauga road - a business (I was expecting it). Big office, many trunks in the building. I've never had it display as PAY PHONE before though today it did.
This isn't happening from all calls, just this one so far.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I found it happened only on certain numbers, not on all.
How did you get True Caller - did you sideload it? I can't get it from the market
mister_al said:
How did you get True Caller - did you sideload it? I can't get it from the market
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
TrueCaller is available from the market. The only issue with it is that the Caller ID number is displayed only for 1-2 rings. Unless I am waiting for it, I'm not fast enough to see the number with TrueCaller until the call ends.
If the caller ID problem really annoys you (like it did me), you should ask Rogers to remove the Name Display option from your Caller ID.
i got the same problem, grrrrrrr
any way of getting the dialer from another build of android?
this sucks, i hate that all calls are as Pay Phone
rajeshr said:
TrueCaller is available from the market. The only issue with it is that the Caller ID number is displayed only for 1-2 rings. Unless I am waiting for it, I'm not fast enough to see the number with TrueCaller until the call ends.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it's not the best solution :/
If the caller ID problem really annoys you (like it did me), you should ask Rogers to remove the Name Display option from your Caller ID.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But won't this remove ALL name display? I only get the caller ID issue for some numbers but not all.
-Roze- said:
But won't this remove ALL name display? I only get the caller ID issue for some numbers but not all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
name display is a feature that you can add or remove from the basic caller id, it shows up the names of people calling who are not on your contact list. if you ask for it remove and someone that is not on your contacts calls you then you will only see the number. just make sure that you still have caller id without name display.
neotekz said:
name display is a feature that you can add or remove from the basic caller id, it shows up the names of people calling who are not on your contact list. if you ask for it remove and someone that is not on your contacts calls you then you will only see the number. just make sure that you still have caller id without name display.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So just to confirm, if you're in my contact list, your name is still displayed?
-Roze- said:
So just to confirm, if you're in my contact list, your name is still displayed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup you still see their names
neotekz said:
yup you still see their names
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks Tested and it works!
Anyone tested to see if the new firmware fixes the issue?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
the update wont fix this as its not a problem with bell and at&t atrix. doubt they are ever going to do anything about this unless the phone comes to a carrier with name display.
Maybe, but it would be nice to get a confirmation from a rogers customer
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
neotekz said:
the update wont fix this as its not a problem with bell and at&t atrix. doubt they are ever going to do anything about this unless the phone comes to a carrier with name display.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well the Atrix will be released in Europe soon, so maybe that version will have the name display option like us What do you think? lol
Hello All.
I was hoping someone could advise me on how to make a normal carrier based video call. I've looked everywhere and am a little shocked to see that my atrix does not support video calls.
when calling my atrix from another phone on the same network that supports video calling (Telecom New Zealand XT network which is UMTS(WCDMA)) i get 'cannt call, other phone does not support video calling'. hmph!
can anyone help?
many thanks
Gavin.
glegge said:
Hello All.
I was hoping someone could advise me on how to make a normal carrier based video call. I've looked everywhere and am a little shocked to see that my atrix does not support video calls.
when calling my atrix from another phone on the same network that supports video calling (Telecom New Zealand XT network which is UMTS(WCDMA)) i get 'cannt call, other phone does not support video calling'. hmph!
can anyone help?
many thanks
Gavin.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, for real? There is Qik, Skype, Gtalk, Tang, Yahoo Messenger, Fring... Just because there is not a carrier specific one (Hardly any carrier actually supports carrier specific video calls)...who cares?
You looked everywhere? LOL with what, Bing?
BravoMotorola said:
Wow, for real? There is Qik, Skype, Gtalk, Tang, Yahoo Messenger, Fring... Just because there is not a carrier specific one (Hardly any carrier actually supports carrier specific video calls)...who cares?
You looked everywhere? LOL with what, Bing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Carrier based video calling is actually pretty common outside the US, even though it is almost completely unheard of here. I'm a little surprised the international versions of this phone don't support video calls, but not surprised at all to see that feature lacking on the US version.
Have there been any Android phones that do this? I know the international version of my old Fuze (Touch Pro) had an FFC and did it even though the AT&T version didn't.
Sent from my MB860
Unfortunately android phones don't support standard video calling.
And yes, most of the world has a standard video call that works same on all carriers, even between carriers works. The usa is the only place that does not have video calling.
Does anyone know why this is though?
And does anyone know how video calling (direct, not third-party like google, skype, fring, etc.) works exactly, I get that a line is connected between the two phones, but what about information sharing? Are there any special permissions needed to use this direct data connection?
What about the video/sound compressors?
Why doesn't America feature this?
I hope i didn't go off topic, but I am rather interested in this......
Will google, and if any cares/helps me find me answer, i will post everything i'va gathered
Mizulunaris said:
Does anyone know why this is though?
And does anyone know how video calling (direct, not third-party like google, skype, fring, etc.) works exactly, I get that a line is connected between the two phones, but what about information sharing? Are there any special permissions needed to use this direct data connection?
What about the video/sound compressors?
Why doesn't America feature this?
I hope i didn't go off topic, but I am rather interested in this......
Will google, and if any cares/helps me find me answer, i will post everything i'va gathered
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it uses your data connection to stream video to each other. plain and simple. uses the same data network as your phone's internet.
Actually my friend has a galaxy s ii which does have carrier video calling.I wonder how I can enable it on my atrix with gingerbread loaded, fresh from motorola update...
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
dLo GSR said:
it uses your data connection to stream video to each other. plain and simple. uses the same data network as your phone's internet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The service does have to be enabled per subscriber in the hlr also
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
glegge said:
The service does have to be enabled per subscriber in the hlr also
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i don't know what "HLR" is, but Qik, Tango and Google Talk Video (the apps that work on the Atrix) are not carrier dependent. i've gotten all three to work fine on a Galaxy Tab Wifi (no cellular carrier).
dLo GSR said:
i don't know what "HLR" is, but Qik, Tango and Google Talk Video (the apps that work on the Atrix) are not carrier dependent. i've gotten all three to work fine on a Galaxy Tab Wifi (no cellular carrier).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah yes they will work because they just use any old internet connection.the service I am looking for runs over the carrier. Hlr is home location register. Or your subscriber profile.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1180432
That is a link to folks that found video call on there galaxy. This is what I am looking for on the atrix.I guess there must be a module which can be installed...fingers crossed someone knows..
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
yeah even in canada rogers had this service but it didn't take off as the cameras sucked and there wasn't much use for it when you add in the screen size of the phones that had it. I had it on my HTC TyTn and Touch Pro. I think one carrier was looking to roll it out in the US. AT&T was against it so all those winmo devices that came out on their network had the front camera taken out. I could be wrong, but the Iphone 4 was the first device where they allowed it.
RogerPodacter said:
Unfortunately android phones don't support standard video calling.
And yes, most of the world has a standard video call that works same on all carriers, even between carriers works. The usa is the only place that does not have video calling.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I confirm that some Android phones have a carrier video calling feature.
I own an Atrix 4G (2.3.4), and my wife owns a Samsung Galaxy S II (2.3.3)
And yes, there is a video call option in her phone's dialer.
We live in Moscow and have different carriers. 2 days ago i bricked my Atrix 4G trying to unlock its bootloader, so i had to stick back to my rubbish Samsung Z510. As soon as i put my sim-card into it and powered on the phone i could see a "3g" icon in status bar. And yes there was a video call option in my z510's dialer. It worked like a charm. Carriers video calls in Moscow cost the same as regular voice calls, so i'm quite interested in finding a way to mod my atrix as soon as i get a new one instead of bricked one. From today the source code of Atrix 4G is opened and i just hope that xda developers will pay attention to adding carrier video call in their future custom roms.
You can also try Oovoo. It works for both computer to phone and phone to phone calls.
Sent from my I500 using XDA App
oovoo doesn't work on the ATRIX.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Just a bump incase anyone has something more to contribute
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Dowload "Qik for Atrix". The app was designed for the Atrix but works on other phones. Its best to tell the other user to download Qik on their phone as well.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
android dialers doesnt support yet, just with apps we can do that...
I use Tango. worked better than fring for me.
but I live in California.
so then... I guess my input is useless...
sorry. :\
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
please note this thread is just for network provider provided video calling.native to the network. So apps like skype etc are not related to this thread. Android does do video call on the galaxy so it must be a mater of time before someone makes this work on atrix.
Many thanks.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
again, the iP 3GS is my 1st and only smart phone. 1 thing i love about it is the instant/digital Voicemail. does/will Android/Note have this same/similar feature??
tx --- art.
ARTAQaf said:
again, the iP 3GS is my 1st and only smart phone. 1 thing i love about it is the instant/digital Voicemail. does/will Android/Note have this same/similar feature??
tx --- art.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check out Google Voice. It is even better and will transcribe & email messages to you!
ARTAQaf said:
again, the iP 3GS is my 1st and only smart phone. 1 thing i love about it is the instant/digital Voicemail. does/will Android/Note have this same/similar feature??
tx --- art.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it will have visual voicemail.
ARTAQaf said:
again, the iP 3GS is my 1st and only smart phone. 1 thing i love about it is the instant/digital Voicemail. does/will Android/Note have this same/similar feature??
tx --- art.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will probably work like visual voicemail on the Skyrocket: http://www.samsung.com/us/support/SupportOwnersFAQPopup.do?faq_id=FAQ00044776&fm_seq=45375
hauj0bb said:
It will probably work like visual voicemail on the Skyrocket: http://www.samsung.com/us/support/SupportOwnersFAQPopup.do?faq_id=FAQ00044776&fm_seq=45375
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whoa seriously?? That's awesome Visual Voicemail is on the Note. That was one of the biggest things I missed from iOS. Using the same voicemail as dumbphones seemed like such a contridiction on my Captivate.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using xda premium
Consider Google Voice.
Visual voice mail with text transcription is just One of the features.
Others include setting same phone number on multiple phones (land line or mobile phones) and choose when to ring them based on a schedule.
View or listen to your voicemail via phone, mobile app, or web app.
Custom voice greeting per user
http://www.google.com/googlevoice/about.html
x10 !! GV rocks.
alexige said:
Whoa seriously?? That's awesome Visual Voicemail is on the Note. That was one of the biggest things I missed from iOS. Using the same voicemail as dumbphones seemed like such a contridiction on my Captivate.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What contradiction? Why didn't you just use Google Voice?
Dave*228 said:
Consider Google Voice.
Visual voice mail with text transcription is just One of the features.
Others include setting same phone number on multiple phones (land line or mobile phones) and choose when to ring them based on a schedule.
View or listen to your voicemail via phone, mobile app, or web app.
Custom voice greeting per user
http://www.google.com/googlevoice/about.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Voicemails sound metallic with google voice, and the transcription is almost never correct.
I noticed when someone is leaving me a voicemail this what happens: phone starts ringing about 4 to 5 times then stops while the caller is still hearing that the phone is ringing for another 5 - 6 times then Google voice kicks in. TOO LONG for the caller to leave a message. Any way to shorter the amount of the phone rings before Google answering machine picks up ?
If only google voice allowed mms
And not sure if you guys have noticed that they say calls wont be free next year? Not sure what that means.
SysAdmNj said:
If only google voice allowed mms
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There was a news recently that Google is experimenting MMS.
And not sure if you guys have noticed that they say calls wont be free next year? Not sure what that means.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google says that every year. Basically, they don't want to you get the idea that the way current GV charges will be that way forever.
I'm actually using GV primarily for international calling (not Canada) because it is cheaper and hassle free than any other methods.
daraj said:
I noticed when someone is leaving me a voicemail this what happens: phone starts ringing about 4 to 5 times then stops while the caller is still hearing that the phone is ringing for another 5 - 6 times then Google voice kicks in. TOO LONG for the caller to leave a message. Any way to shorter the amount of the phone rings before Google answering machine picks up ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if this is true then no thanks to GV. my clients need to leave a message, i can't have them just hanging up because they can't wait forever wondering if VM will come on.
foxbat121 said:
There was a news recently that Google is experimenting MMS.
Google says that every year. Basically, they don't want to you get the idea that the way current GV charges will be that way forever.
I'm actually using GV primarily for international calling (not Canada) because it is cheaper and hassle free than any other methods.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know whats funny sometimes, certain friends may send me an mms message and gv will notify me of it but I'll have to look in the gmail inbox to view it. It only happens with some not all.
Its like I use my minutes every time I make a local call with gv anyways, so I have no idea what they mean. I hope they dont mean it'll cost me double to use gv.
ARTAQaf said:
if this is true then no thanks to GV. my clients need to leave a message, i can't have them just hanging up because they can't wait forever wondering if VM will come on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a code you can dial on your phone to change the duration when your voicemail will pick up. It's an AT&T setting, not configuration through any other way.
This is how you adjust when a call goes to vmail
On your phone, dial *#61# and click Send.
Some information should be displayed: number that the calls are being forwarded to and the delay before the forwarding engages.
Write down the number (including +1)
Dial **61*+1xxxyyyzzzz*11*30# and hit Send. +1xxxyyyzzzz is the number you wrote down previously, 30 is the delay in seconds. The delay can be set in 5 second increments, 30 is maximum
Dial *#61# to verify that the new settings are active.
hauj0bb said:
Voicemails sound metallic with google voice, and the transcription is almost never correct.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I find the VM quality as good as the carriers. The transcriptions are not always perfect, but they are alsays close enough to allow me to quietly read all my VMs (during a boring meeting) to determine if i can delete them or save them to take action on. I find it to be an amazing service; of which the Voicemail is just one part. If you have multiple phone's its invaluable.
bkeaver said:
This is how you adjust when a call goes to vmail
On your phone, dial *#61# and click Send.
Some information should be displayed: number that the calls are being forwarded to and the delay before the forwarding engages.
Write down the number (including +1)
Dial **61*+1xxxyyyzzzz*11*30# and hit Send. +1xxxyyyzzzz is the number you wrote down previously, 30 is the delay in seconds. The delay can be set in 5 second increments, 30 is maximum
Dial *#61# to verify that the new settings are active.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for that, but even if I set ATT voice mail to 5 sec pickup Google voice takes forever to pick up. Seems like GV is the one needs adjustment. im sure there is a setting somewhere
SysAdmNj said:
Its like I use my minutes every time I make a local call with gv anyways, so I have no idea what they mean. I hope they dont mean it'll cost me double to use gv.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GV app on your phone doesn't use VoIP at all. What it does is auto-forward your outgoing GV calls to a local phone number nearby. It does this to avoid anger carriers. If GV does VoIP calls, all carrier will bar the app being avaialabe to their phones.
So, yes, you still use you minutes.
Anyone know of a trick to getting AT&T Visual Voicemail to work on Unlocked T-Mobile? The app will install, but not connect during setup process.
Thank you in advance for any help you can provide.
****EDIT*** It turns out that is was an AT&T issue when they provisioned my SIMS for LTE they didn't setup my email.
Thanks everyone for the help!
chrispyutec said:
Anyone know of a trick to getting AT&T Visual Voicemail to work on Unlocked T-Mobile? The app will install, but not connect during setup process.
Thank you in advance for any help you can provide.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have it working just fine. I downloaded the app from the app store and opened it up. After opening the app, I was prompted to dial my voicemail. Then entered my password. I had no new messages so I closed it out and then was prompted to enter my voicemail password in visual voicemail. Haven't had any issues. I am using an international ROM as well
slimc84 said:
I have it working just fine. I downloaded the app from the app store and opened it up. After opening the app, I was prompted to dial my voicemail. Then entered my password. I had no new messages so I closed it out and then was prompted to enter my voicemail password in visual voicemail. Haven't had any issues. I am using an international ROM as well
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wonder why I'm having a problem. I'm running Alliance rom from the international thread. It ask me to enter the 10 digit mail box number of the person I'm trying to reach and when I enter my phone number it says sorry can't find the mail box. A third party app works so I'm wondering if my problem might be carrier related.
Thank you for your response.
chrispyutec said:
Wonder why I'm having a problem. I'm running Alliance rom from the international thread. It ask me to enter the 10 digit mail box number of the person I'm trying to reach and when I enter my phone number it says sorry can't find the mail box. A third party app works so I'm wondering if my problem might be carrier related.
Thank you for your response.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which version of Alliance are you using? I'm using V3.1 and haven't had any issues.
slimc84 said:
Which version of Alliance are you using? I'm using V3.1 and haven't had any issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'M ON 3.1 I think it's carrier related because it does the same on other roms. Plus I had to get AT&T to provision my sim card for LTE. I'm sure they screwed something up.
chrispyutec said:
i'M ON 3.1 I think it's carrier related because it does the same on other roms. Plus I had to get AT&T to provision my sim card for LTE. I'm sure they screwed something up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's odd. I didn't have to do any of that. I purchased my phone from T-Mobile, SIM unlock through Cellunlocker.net, changed my APN settings and I was good to go. It shouldn't make a difference as I am using an unlocked T-Mobile variant and my VVM is working fine. Send me a PM around 7PM EST or so and I can see if I can get it working for you.
slimc84 said:
That's odd. I didn't have to do any of that. I purchased my phone from T-Mobile, SIM unlock through Cellunlocker.net, changed my APN settings and I was good to go. It shouldn't make a difference as I am using an unlocked T-Mobile variant and my VVM is working fine. Send me a PM around 7PM EST or so and I can see if I can get it working for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using SIM unlocked T-Mobile on AT&T. I have my APN set just like my wife's AT&T S5.
slimc84 said:
That's odd. I didn't have to do any of that. I purchased my phone from T-Mobile, SIM unlock through Cellunlocker.net, changed my APN settings and I was good to go. It shouldn't make a difference as I am using an unlocked T-Mobile variant and my VVM is working fine. Send me a PM around 7PM EST or so and I can see if I can get it working for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Problem solved. It was AT&T that had something screwed up. I want to thank you so much for trying to help and offering the PM for additional direct help. People like you what makes XDA as awesome as it is!!! I hit your thanks button.
chrispyutec said:
Problem solved. It was AT&T that had something screwed up. I want to thank you so much for trying to help and offering the PM for additional direct help. People like you what makes XDA as awesome as it is!!! I hit your thanks button.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm glad that you got it taken care of. I know how frustrating it can be for a phone not to function as intended.