Related
But do you guys think that the X10 will EVER be cracked to use Custom Roms? And IF it is, do you think we will be able to get 2.2, 2.3, etc on it?
Again sorry if asked.
solidkevin said:
But do you guys think that the X10 will EVER be cracked to use Custom Roms? And IF it is, do you think we will be able to get 2.2, 2.3, etc on it?
Again sorry if asked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the guys (jerplea, maxrfon, bin4ry, zdzhiu etc) are making great progress
check their threads for more info but they appear to have loaded a /system folder from 2.2 onto a 2.1 kernel now, and have got right into the NAND area now. hopefully something soon but im not gunna pressure these guys - they are not getting paid and we will all benefit
original question, Yes, 2.2 Yes, 2.3 maybe (512mb ram is required/recommended - not sure which one)
From what I have read on xda forums over the years...
And seeing what ppl come up with. A lot of times devs on sites like these end up knowing more that the original creators of the device.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
mrtim123 said:
the guys (jerplea, maxrfon, bin4ry, zdzhiu etc) are making great progress
check their threads for more info but they appear to have loaded a /system folder from 2.2 onto a 2.1 kernel now, and have got right into the NAND area now. hopefully something soon but im not gunna pressure these guys - they are not getting paid and we will all benefit
original question, Yes, 2.2 Yes, 2.3 maybe (512mb ram is required/recommended - not sure which one)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like mrtim123 said, jerpelea and zdzhiu are working together now to complete the 2.2.1 custom froyo rom. once they figure out how to get gsm radio, wifi, gps figured out, it will be released. i suggest if you really benefit from their work to provide a small donation.
also, mrtim123, i'm pretty sure that 528 ram requirement is smoke and mirrors. not sure where that number originated, but i don't believe there is much truth behind it.
MOD EDIT: THIS IS THE Q&A SECTION FOR [BL1.1][BL1.2] GtabComb by zyhong
ALL Q&A FOR THIS ROM HAPPENS HERE.
Thanks.
BL1.1 ONLY
MOD EDIT: THIS IS THE Q&A SECTION FOR [BL1.1][BL1.2] GtabComb by zyhong
ALL Q&A FOR THIS ROM HAPPENS HERE.
Thanks.
Thank you very much! Just got it running, so far no issues or force closes. I have been waiting on a 1.1 bl honeycomb. Thank you!
Wow! Great news, definitely gonna give this a try, had lots of issues the last time I used a 1.2 based bootloader,so I'm really glad to see this!
Thanks!
Justin
Editing out, as I PM'd the OP instead.
Thanks in advance.
there's a 1.1 version of this now????
Sm0k3d 0uT said:
there's a 1.1 version of this now????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm actually surprised that it took this long.
We used the 1.2 bl initially because we had to as we ported directly from the Adam devs. But once there were Clem kernel ports, it wasn't technically a requirement anymore. I just never changed my port as my opinions on 1.2 are already well-stated and sticking with it made sense to me, at least. But that doesn't mean that a 1.1 based HC ROM was impossible.
However, if NI releases a HC port and it's using a .36 kernel to make everything work, this 1.1 ROM might have issues with porting that. But this is all speculation, at this point - I don't know if a NI port will even work on a GTAB yet, regardless of the bootloader used.
does this has the same bl 1.2 version issues or just the usb to pc?!
bl 1.2 version has these issues:
(copied from other forum)
- Camera isn't working (pulled out the app for now)
- Browser is working, but OpenGL is disabled for it to work. That means no Flash on the stock browser.
- (High-def) video playback does not work, yet.
any testers can confirm this? i'm a bit feeling lazy to try it today
confirmed but very smooth i love it its not reading my sdcard though how can i get it to read sd card?
Sent from my Bottle of Smoke using XDA Premium App
Editing out , as I PM'd the OP. Nothing bad, just some suggestions is all.
Awwwww, yeah! I'm pumped. Is this essentially the same as Roebeet's BOS, with the same features not working yet?
This is great news!
Is it accelerated?
Does it run Flash 10.3?
TIA
Sent from my Atrix using Tapatalk
remove as it is personal chat
jesemalave1 said:
confirmed but very smooth i love it its not reading my sdcard though how can i get it to read sd card?
Sent from my Bottle of Smoke using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Odd...seems to work ok on mine.
I did notice that it's called "/external_sd" though, might want to check to see if you have that on your device.
Justin
never mind i cpoied to external sd need to change storageto external as sdcard please as default had to copy all my info from external to internal usb..and flash and everything is working good QUICK QUESTION EVERYONE IM USING SETCPU AND LETS ME OVER CLOCK TO 1GHZ IS THIS A OVER CLOCKED KERNEL IF NOT WHICH APP SHOULD I USE TO OVERCLOCK
Sent from my Bottle of Smoke using XDA Premium App
(Editing out the first part, as I PM'd the OP directly. But leaving this part in....)
One other thing, on a good note -- I'm definitely happy to see more modders our there for the GTablet. Options are always a good thing and I plan to pull back a bit, starting new month. So the more HC ports we have, the better!
Quick question... If I'm running Vegan 5.1.1, what do I need to do to install this ROM? Full wipe? Just flash it from CWM? Something else entirely?
Sorry, I'm still a bit of a noob at all of this, but I promise I'm trying to learn!
roebeet said:
I was really hesitant to post anything, as I really don't want you taking this the wrong way. I apologize if it came off as anything else but a concern for post-support, that was not my intent (and, in retrospect, a PM would have been better. My bad).
The branding, for me, is mostly about post-support. Remember, I'm a sysadmin by trade so when I get PM's on issues, I usually ask the usual questions like what mod, what version, how did you install it, etc. That's actually why I started branding "TNT Lite" as such back in November, as it was easier for me to know if a user was actually using my ROM or not. That's really my only concern, here. When two different mods are branded the same, it will get confusing. Especially if they are on two different development branches. It is fun, I agree - that's why I do this. But for users who soft-brick, it's sometimes a major panic attack and a lot of them are hesitant to use nvflash.
One other thing, on a good note -- I'm definitely happy to see more modders our there for the GTablet. Options are always a good thing and I plan to pull back a bit, starting new month. So the more HC ports we have, the better!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Robeet, I think you were spot on, the OP is not reading it correctly. I can just see the flood of posts/PM's asking you questions and users cross posting between 1.1/1.2 because of this and the difficulty of tracking all this. it's difficult enough keeping up with all these great roms and boot loader types, I could not imagine what it is like on your guys side.
OP he is not dissing you, he is just asking that you rename it so you can support issues and he does not have to keep getting cross questions, it's pretty much non-issue in my eyes.
OP, thanks for supporting the Gtab and the 1.1. people like all you devs that make android so much fun and android FTW over IOS.
ZebTheCalvinist said:
Quick question... If I'm running Vegan 5.1.1, what do I need to do to install this ROM? Full wipe? Just flash it from CWM? Something else entirely?
Sorry, I'm still a bit of a noob at all of this, but I promise I'm trying to learn!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, full wipe and flash it. do a backup of course just incase you want to go back. back up your apps as well so you can restore them on the other side of HC.
removed as it is personal chat
roebeet said:
And it starts....says "Bottle of Smoke" in your XDA app.
Remember - it's a fork of BoS. It has a different kernel and possibly a different ramdisk, so I don't know how it will perform versus BoS (the original one).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe this should be called something like "Bottle of Smoke MOD" since technically it is a modified version of the original.
Any CM7 news for X2?
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/24376-motorola-droid-x2-mb870/page__p__227934
Nothing new.
Not until we unlock the bootloader...
Probably nothing especially since the bionic has come out. DX2 has always been the Red Headed Step Child.
quadjacks said:
Probably nothing especially since the bionic has come out. DX2 has always been the Red Headed Step Child.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And once the Prime and Vigor come out....wait what phone are we talking about?!
SwiftLegend said:
Not until we unlock the bootloader...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not true. CM7 for the DX1 works with a locked bootloader and 2nd-init. DX1 CM7 also only works right now with a Froyo kernel. It should not be impossible now that we have 2nd-init with GB.
Did anyone ask who was actually working on it? I remember the name "dragonzkiller" thrown around but nothing seemed to have come from it. If he isn't, did anyone actually start up the project again? I hate this idea of asking "what the status?" without asking "who is working on it?" and "can we help out?"
mostKnownUnknown said:
That's not true. CM7 for the DX1 works with a locked bootloader and 2nd-init. DX1 CM7 also only works right now with a Froyo kernel. It should not be impossible now that we have 2nd-init with GB.
Did anyone ask who was actually working on it? I remember the name "dragonzkiller" thrown around but nothing seemed to have come from it. If he isn't, did anyone actually start up the project again? I hate this idea of asking "what the status?" without asking "who is working on it?" and "can we help out?"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 'locked bootloader' response is pretty standard on this, and it's getting annoying.
Original X= locked bootloader = CM7
However (I may be wrong) didn't they get CM7 to work by using a dev X? Figured out some way to use 2nd-init after playing with a fully unlocked X? I remember reading something like that...
mostKnownUnknown said:
That's not true. CM7 for the DX1 works with a locked bootloader and 2nd-init. DX1 CM7 also only works right now with a Froyo kernel. It should not be impossible now that we have 2nd-init with GB.
Did anyone ask who was actually working on it? I remember the name "dragonzkiller" thrown around but nothing seemed to have come from it. If he isn't, did anyone actually start up the project again? I hate this idea of asking "what the status?" without asking "who is working on it?" and "can we help out?"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That being said, you will wind up with a CM7 that has no custom kernel. Nothing wrong with that, but it's kinda half assed if you ask me. Basically like installing a theme + apps and debloating. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
mistawolfe said:
The 'locked bootloader' response is pretty standard on this, and it's getting annoying.
Original X= locked bootloader = CM7
However (I may be wrong) didn't they get CM7 to work by using a dev X? Figured out some way to use 2nd-init after playing with a fully unlocked X? I remember reading something like that...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That wouldn't make any sense. If you are unlocked, you wouldn't need 2nd-init since you have complete access to the first init. Also, they had to pull a number of modifications to get the Froyo kernel to work on the CM7 GB base. If you are unlocked, you shouldn't need to do all that work. You would've just flashed the latest and greatest kernel.
the2dcour said:
That being said, you will wind up with a CM7 that has no custom kernel. Nothing wrong with that, but it's kinda half assed if you ask me. Basically like installing a theme + apps and debloating. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True. But my feeling right now is that we have no idea at the phone's base performance with all of the Moto blur running on top of it. I'd like to see at least one pure AOSP ROM to see where we are at.
Plus more flashing options are good and CM7 is not a bad option.
mostKnownUnknown said:
That wouldn't make any sense. If you are unlocked, you wouldn't need 2nd-init since you have complete access to the first init. Also, they had to pull a number of modifications to get the Froyo kernel to work on the CM7 GB base. If you are unlocked, you shouldn't need to do all that work. You would've just flashed the latest and greatest kernel.
True. But my feeling right now is that we have no idea at the phone's base performance with all of the Moto blur running on top of it. I'd like to see at least one pure AOSP ROM to see where we are at.
Plus more flashing options are good and CM7 is not a bad option.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My message came out wrong.
I always ask the same thing, "Why can they figure out CM on an X but not an X2?" - and someone told me they learned from an unlocked developer device what it would take to make it run on a standard locked X. Basically the ones engineers get.
This was the answer I got in a forum, so I guess I should take it with a grain of salt, but that's what I read.
the2dcour said:
That being said, you will wind up with a CM7 that has no custom kernel. Nothing wrong with that, but it's kinda half assed if you ask me. Basically like installing a theme + apps and debloating. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's why I responded with "Not until unlocked bootloader"
SwiftLegend said:
That's why I responded with "Not until unlocked bootloader"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to offend you because I don't really even know you, but I think this highlights a problem in our community.
I think our community has an awful mentality. There are too many people who say they want something without really knowing what to do to get it, let alone have the initiative to get it. I think the biggest problem in the community is our lack of devs. Most of them don't even own this phone. Yet we somehow expect good ROMs to appear overnight and when we don't get them, we blame Moto and VZW for all our problems. Really? Say we get a bootloader unlock at the end of this year. Do we really expect devs to come to our phone in droves with all the LTE goodness in everyone's road map? Really? If we want CM7 on our phone, how about we work on a 2nd-init version today so if we get unlocked, it takes a few weeks for a kernel-enhanced CM7 instead of a few months.
I want us to change our mentality to doers instead of winers. So much time is wasted on flaming Moto and VZW and wining about our phone instead of something constructive. Take the initiative people. You want a ROM that does X, Y, Z? How about you learn how to make that ROM. Don't know how to make a ROM? Ask Nitro. Ask navenedrob. Go and ask someone who knows to help. If someone else has a ROM with the same idea, pair up and become a team. You want a kernel to overclock? Learn about kexec and how to get that to work. Learn about our bootloader and possible ways to crack it. There are so many ways to contribute to this community yet soo many people love to post in the "state of our crappy phone" thread. Seriously. Take the initiative people.
Now that I got that out. Is anyone still working on a DX2 CM7? If not what, do we need to do to get that started up again if someone wants it?
mostKnownUnknown said:
Now that I got that out. Is anyone still working on a DX2 CM7? If not what, do we need to do to get that started up again if someone wants it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if i knew what to do id totally help. ive wanted to get into android development for a while just never had a device until a few weeks ago
mostKnownUnknown said:
Not to offend you because I don't really even know you, but I think this highlights a problem in our community.
I think our community has an awful mentality. There are too many people who say they want something without really knowing what to do to get it, let alone have the initiative to get it. I think the biggest problem in the community is our lack of devs. Most of them don't even own this phone. Yet we somehow expect good ROMs to appear overnight and when we don't get them, we blame Moto and VZW for all our problems. Really? Say we get a bootloader unlock at the end of this year. Do we really expect devs to come to our phone in droves with all the LTE goodness in everyone's road map? Really? If we want CM7 on our phone, how about we work on a 2nd-init version today so if we get unlocked, it takes a few weeks for a kernel-enhanced CM7 instead of a few months.
I want us to change our mentality to doers instead of winers. So much time is wasted on flaming Moto and VZW and wining about our phone instead of something constructive. Take the initiative people. You want a ROM that does X, Y, Z? How about you learn how to make that ROM. Don't know how to make a ROM? Ask Nitro. Ask navenedrob. Go and ask someone who knows to help. If someone else has a ROM with the same idea, pair up and become a team. You want a kernel to overclock? Learn about kexec and how to get that to work. Learn about our bootloader and possible ways to crack it. There are so many ways to contribute to this community yet soo many people love to post in the "state of our crappy phone" thread. Seriously. Take the initiative people.
Now that I got that out. Is anyone still working on a DX2 CM7? If not what, do we need to do to get that started up again if someone wants it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree. I would try helping with development if I knew how. I'd have to go learn Java now and who knows how long that will take. I was only saying that we needed an unlocked bootloader because you know that people are going to complain that we have CM7 (theoretically) but no custom kernel. You know how many headaches that would cause just from reading a bunch of threads full of complaints...
mostKnownUnknown said:
Now that I got that out. Is anyone still working on a DX2 CM7? If not what, do we need to do to get that started up again if someone wants it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone named dragonzkiller is who your looking for...just posted in the development section that he's still trying to get it going...
I know I will almost indefinitely be flamed for asking this, but oh well here goes.
When I first got my AT&T SGS2, I installed an international rom (villain) It ran perfectly fine other than the fact calls were not operating properly. I immediately jumped ship though scared for my phone's life. I reflashed stock and AT&T modem, but now that I think back on it- wouldn't having flashed the at&t modem remedied that problem? and if truly need be couldn't an at&t version kernel be flashed( i.e. Entropy's DD) Everything seemed to operate perfectly fine (install went well, booted properly, smooth homescreen, apps running great)
In theory, replacing kernel/modem (and making sure the ROM doesn't include a bootloader) should work - however this is untested.
I'm going to be trying it tonight with SensatioN, as I did like that ROM when "hellraised" on Infuse and someone requested it, and it's about time someone tries to do a "hellraise" on an I9100 ROM.
Entropy512 said:
In theory, replacing kernel/modem (and making sure the ROM doesn't include a bootloader) should work - however this is untested.
I'm going to be trying it tonight with SensatioN, as I did like that ROM when "hellraised" on Infuse and someone requested it, and it's about time someone tries to do a "hellraise" on an I9100 ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You go entropy. Awesome. I will be glad to test it for you if needed.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Very cool! I more or less figured as much but i'm not quite that daring. I would be willing to do testing as well ( Oh and Entropy, Sensation was the rom I was looking at ) I too came over from the Infuse.(Thanks for all the kernel love!)
Hammersuit said:
Very cool! I more or less figured as much but i'm not quite that daring. I would be willing to do testing as well ( Oh and Entropy, Sensation was the rom I was looking at ) I too came over from the Infuse.(Thanks for all the kernel love!)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1328110 - Once I get permission to do so from the SensatioN ROM dev, I'll post it in dev as a proof-of-concept with details of what I did to port it.
Note that I don't have too much time to continue maintenance of a ROM - it's not where my skillset lies and between Real Life and kernel work, I'm pretty busy as is! But at least this will provide a starting point for those that want to go further.
Entropy512 said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1328110 - Once I get permission to do so from the SensatioN ROM dev, I'll post it in dev as a proof-of-concept with details of what I did to port it.
Note that I don't have too much time to continue maintenance of a ROM - it's not where my skillset lies and between Real Life and kernel work, I'm pretty busy as is! But at least this will provide a starting point for those that want to go further.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you're correct bro. ports from i9100 roms are very possible. the one thing you will need to do is change some of the lib and bin files to rid the issues with the mic on in calls. i think ive successfully ported just about most of the i9100 dev section so far. lol. for personal use only. if you need some help just let me know.
Entropy512 said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1328110 - Once I get permission to do so from the SensatioN ROM dev, I'll post it in dev as a proof-of-concept with details of what I did to port it.
Note that I don't have too much time to continue maintenance of a ROM - it's not where my skillset lies and between Real Life and kernel work, I'm pretty busy as is! But at least this will provide a starting point for those that want to go further.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha! Completely understandable. Thank you so much though, this proof-of-concept is wonderful news. It would be most beneficial to see some ports of well-supported GT-I9100 roms such as villain and DLEV rom etc.
Looks like there might be some known issues with my PoC port then... as I said, I haven't tested outgoing audio much (this is much harder for me to test than dialing voicemail...)
task650 said:
you're correct bro. ports from i9100 roms are very possible. the one thing you will need to do is change some of the lib and bin files to rid the issues with the mic on in calls. i think ive successfully ported just about most of the i9100 dev section so far. lol. for personal use only. if you need some help just let me know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which files are those? I tried to find the relevant CM7 commit (since they had mic issues in calls) but couldn't find it.
I know that turning Samsung Noise Reduction off (or on? It's freaking unclear whether "on" is the current state or destination state in the menus) seems to work around the problem on a per-call basis.
Entropy512 said:
Which files are those? I tried to find the relevant CM7 commit (since they had mic issues in calls) but couldn't find it.
I know that turning Samsung Noise Reduction off (or on? It's freaking unclear whether "on" is the current state or destination state in the menus) seems to work around the problem on a per-call basis.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I get home tonight ill look at which files I had to replace for dlev rom and shoot them over to you. Might be tomorrow depending on how late though bro.
Alright, this thread is for all developers to post their progress, sources, etc for other developers to work on. There will be NO tolerance of "Good job" "thanks" etc, just click the damned button on the bottom. Now, what I have so far, is found that the tiamat kernels from cayniarb don't even boot so no kernel logs from that. I assume jmz may have something to contribute with kernels.
Here's a port of the flyer ICS rom (not the one chaos is working on) for the view. It boots to a black screen but you can get a logcat. We have gotten it to the bootanimation before so it should'nt be hard to do. If someone posts logcats (since I don't have the view) I will still help out
Link: http://d-h.st/j4hep7wqbo35
Good Job and Thanks ...sorry i had to. But yeah, what we have now is looking like a kernel issue. I have source and Im looking at it but that DOES NOT mean, im going to be able to do something useful. lol.
What we really need is a good work over the kernel aspect.. I think cayniarb's done a decent job getting it initiated but he doesn't have a view to test it on :/
I only understand how to modify the source of existing kernels, getting AOSP kernel out of the source for whatever was tailored by HTC is way beyond my skill, so I look towards you guys for that.
We've have several guys trying to work on a kernel though, what's the status from each of their end? (Thought they were all working independently, etc)
sorry to jump in to this discussion, but had to know if development is under action here or somewhere else? WOuld love to see some progress with ics on View, cos right now my View is about to die... ive lost intesest in it. Its sluggish, slow and not optimized... have faith in you guys though
Gumby63 said:
Here's a port of the flyer ICS rom (not the one chaos is working on) for the view. It boots to a black screen but you can get a logcat. We have gotten it to the bootanimation before so it should'nt be hard to do. If someone posts logcats (since I don't have the view) I will still help out
Link:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any chance you still have that port? I might be able to make some head-way if all we need to get this booting is kernel work.
Hmm well that port is really outdated. I tell you what, I will try and get a basic port going of the Sense 4.0 ROM of the flyer and upload that for you guys to mess around with hopefully you will be able to get a logcat out of it
Gumby63 said:
Hmm well that port is really outdated. I tell you what, I will try and get a basic port going of the Sense 4.0 ROM of the flyer and upload that for you guys to mess around with hopefully you will be able to get a logcat out of it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're the man, thank you sir.
Well I'm trying to upload it and I keep getting stuck on 1% which is really annoying so I'll try again later.
You could possibly use the boot.img from the kingdom ICS leak (evo design 4g) since it's the same exact chip and pretty much the same Hw except for the screen(which could cause an issue?). I tried just booting that leak(only changing the partitions in the update-script to match the views) and of course it was a no go which I expected but had to give it a shot anyway. lol So then I edited the build.prop and copied over some libs (which I think is the problem since they are HC libs). I also unpacked both the stock HC boot.img and the kingdom leak boot.img. I'm thinking I have to make changes there but I dont know what to change. I dont even get logcat access just stuck at the HTC screen
graffixnyc said:
You could possibly use the boot.img from the kingdom ICS leak (evo design 4g) since it's the same exact chip and pretty much the same Hw except for the screen(which could cause an issue?). I tried just booting that leak(only changing the partitions in the update-script to match the views) and of course it was a no go which I expected but had to give it a shot anyway. lol So then I edited the build.prop and copied over some libs (which I think is the problem since they are HC libs). I also unpacked both the stock HC boot.img and the kingdom leak boot.img. I'm thinking I have to make changes there but I dont know what to change. I dont even get logcat access just stuck at the HTC screen
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could try changing the bootclasspath in the init.rc file of the ramdisk to that of ICS? I've read around before that doing that would make a port boot but I've never had such luck in doing so. If I could ever get this uploaded maybe I can try and help if it has a logcat.
Gumby63 said:
You could try changing the bootclasspath in the init.rc file of the ramdisk to that of ICS? I've read around before that doing that would make a port boot but I've never had such luck in doing so. If I could ever get this uploaded maybe I can try and help if it has a logcat.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Gumby
If youve got a download path for the orig file i will try upload it if you want got quick internet so if you got the orig link i could hvae it uploaded within 30 mins
Let me know
Nope I don't even have a link yet, I'll try again today.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
Okay so I couldn't get it uploaded to Goo.im but dev-host worked. Here's the link to the sense 4.0 port.
http://d-h.st/QQ6
This will not boot. Hopefully someone can download and get a logcat out of it though.
Gumby63 said:
Okay so I couldn't get it uploaded to Goo.im but dev-host worked. Here's the link to the sense 4.0 port.
http://d-h.st/QQ6
This will not boot. Hopefully someone can download and get a logcat out of it though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
logcat: http://pastebin.com/dSmTH2gc
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713
Maybe this can help you guys with your progress
Sent from my PG41200 using xda premium
the key is this
-Quota2 Support
-Genlock Support
-Updated KGSL driver by applying Lord Clockans patches from his kernel
once u got that itll boot..
Well I'm visiting my grandparents and cousins this week and I won't be home until Saturday. So until then I won't have WiFi and I won't be able to help out at all
When I get back I'll see what I can do though
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
I know this is a Dev Only thread, but has anyone started a Donation Pool ($$$) yet for getting ICS on the View 4G? I would be willing to contribute...
theorie said:
I know this is a Dev Only thread, but has anyone started a Donation Pool ($$$) yet for getting ICS on the View 4G? I would be willing to contribute...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll be honest with you, I dont think I have ever really seen a donation pool thread work out the way it should. The donation pools that do usually work better are "get so and so dev this device" (as long as the so and so dev is a well known dev, well respected already yada yada yada)