Do we have a way to record calls like we did in bamf remix 1.6 in gingerbread?..
do the kernels have support now like imorsyns lean kernel? if so what programs are out there?
Thank u
+1
asked but not answered. anyone know?
I didn't notice until reading this thread that moving from BAMF 1.7 to 2.0 #6 that I've lost call recorder. No biggie, but I probably will find a reason to use it now that I don't have it.
no we do not have a nice intergrated call recorder like in froyo. For it to work properly it is something that has to be codded in the kernal from my understanding, and we may need to wait for the source code for an offical GB kernal for the thunderbolt in order to get that done.
Dreamkernel for gb sense supports it
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
thanks for clearing that up escobar will have to check it out
the kid escobar said:
Dreamkernel for gb sense supports it
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That kernel only works on cm7, correct?
I restored callrecorder 2.0 with Titanium from BAMF 1.6.3 into my current 2.0-6 BAMF installation. It continually FC'd with the stock kernel so I flashed the norozehl dreamkernel 2.0.3 beta on Das BAMF 2.0-6 and I still get FC's each time I launch call recorder.
DreamKernel has recorder support and the latest app works fine... Only thing, it records incoming ONLY.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
Bump... Anything yet for full call recording on both sides on any GB Rom or Kernel?
thetwiztidfreak said:
no we do not have a nice intergrated call recorder like in froyo. For it to work properly it is something that has to be codded in the kernal from my understanding, and we may need to wait for the source code for an offical GB kernal for the thunderbolt in order to get that done.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This^^^^^^^^^
Do you guys mind if I ask why everybody seems to want/need a call recorder? I'm honestly curious and see these requests/questions all the time.
I kind of thought that recording somebody (*without their permission) is illegal anyway?
Thanks in advance
~
chimpsnest said:
Do you guys mind if I ask why everybody seems to want/need a call recorder? I'm honestly curious and see these requests/questions all the time.
I kind of thought that recording somebody (*without their permission) is illegal anyway?
Thanks in advance
~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So is pirating. Many do it, however.
Speeding, too. Smoking weed in most places, yep. Underage drinking? of course.
People don't care about the law, and its not illegal in all places.
chimpsnest said:
Do you guys mind if I ask why everybody seems to want/need a call recorder? I'm honestly curious and see these requests/questions all the time.
I kind of thought that recording somebody (*without their permission) is illegal anyway?
Thanks in advance
~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is state specific. In many states like NY, it's a 1 party recording state. So that means only 1 person has to have knowledge that recording is going on.
I am still on BAMF 1.8.6 which has it built in. I love it. I use it only for archival though, almost like a journal. To me, the thought of 30 years from now having every phone call I have ever made or received, and have it be searchable would be insanely cool! I don't know why other people want it, it can be a dangerous tool in the hands of an abusive person.
adrynalyne said:
So is pirating. Many do it, however.
Speeding, too. Smoking weed in most places, yep. Underage drinking? of course.
People don't care about the law, and its not illegal in all places.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I realize that alllll that stuff is illegal in most places, lol, but I'm just trying to wrap my head around the "why" of it, it's kind of creepy
Tx
---------- Post added at 02:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:27 PM ----------
igl007 said:
It is state specific. In many states like NY, it's a 1 party recording state. So that means only 1 person has to have knowledge that recording is going on.
I am still on BAMF 1.8.6 which has it built in. I love it. I use it only for archival though, almost like a journal. To me, the thought of 30 years from now having every phone call I have ever made or received, and have it be searchable would be insanely cool! I don't know why other people want it, it can be a dangerous tool in the hands of an abusive person.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, got ya, I never realized that it was different from state to state (never really thought about it).
Thanks!
the kid escobar said:
Dreamkernel for gb sense supports it
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most kernels are based off of the basic linux kernel, not our new GB kernel. Which means they may have bugs this finished product (If you can call it that) does. Use them until we get source if you must have call recording.
Ziggy's kernel is the only one with fully working call recorder. I sent a pm to neo to see if he planned to fix it in the dream kernel but he never responded.
miketoasty said:
Most kernels are based off of the basic linux kernel, not our new GB kernel. Which means they may have bugs this finished product (If you can call it that) does. Use them until we get source if you must have call recording.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not exactly the best description of it so I'll add a bit to it .
All Android kernels are Linux kernels. All gingerbread kernels that are not for Android Open Source Project (AOSP) ROMs come from the amazing work of Imoseyon to integrate and compile the kernel from the HTC Desire HD (Ace), which is basically the same phone as ours, only with GSM 3g radios. The kernel for Sense that's been out is already bleeding edge as far as it goes for Linux builds.
Having the actual source that was meant for our phones could help somewhat, but it won't matter as much as having a stable OS base that came with the latest Verizon/HTC update.
yareally said:
That's not exactly the best description of it so I'll add a bit to it .
All Android kernels are Linux kernels. All gingerbread kernels that are not for Android Open Source Project (AOSP) ROMs come from the amazing work of Imoseyon to integrate and compile the kernel from the HTC Desire HD (Ace), which is basically the same phone as ours, only with GSM 3g radios. The kernel for Sense that's been out is already bleeding edge as far as it goes for Linux builds.
Having the actual source that was meant for our phones could help somewhat, but it won't matter as much as having a stable OS base that came with the latest Verizon/HTC update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem is, the kernels, aosp and Sense included, have Froyo board sources still.
chimpsnest said:
Do you guys mind if I ask why everybody seems to want/need a call recorder? I'm honestly curious and see these requests/questions all the time.
I kind of thought that recording somebody (*without their permission) is illegal anyway?
Thanks in advance
~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use mine all the time and delete upon confirmation after call is complete. If I am talking to someone that I know I will want to keep the recording...I tell them that this call is being recorded. I do it with one of my clients all the time. I also use it on the ex...I have primary custody of our child and I'm not taking any chances with her...
Morkai Almandragon said:
Ziggy's kernel is the only one with fully working call recorder. I sent a pm to neo to see if he planned to fix it in the dream kernel but he never responded.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This ^^^
I am on Gingeritis VIII with Ziggy's kernel and it works flawlessly incoming, outgoing, on bluetooth, or speaker. Works awesome! Even get the after call dialog box asking if I want to delete or not.
hinds73
Related
They haven't been heavily tested, but IRC seems relatively content with them. Mind you, these were never meant for the Fascinate, but the Mesmerize.
Voodoo
ec10_voodoo.zip
or
http://adbdev.com/danknub/ec10_voodoo.zip
Nonvoodoo
ec10_nonvoodoo.zip
or
http://adbdev.com/danknub/ec10_nonvoodoo.zip
Once again, thanks jt1134 for his scripts.
adrynalyne said:
They haven't been heavily tested, but IRC seems relatively content with them. Mind you, these were never meant for the Fascinate, but the Mesmerize.
Voodoo
ec10_voodoo.zip
Nonvoodoo
ec10_nonvoodoo.zip
Once again, thanks jt1134 for his scripts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ill give it a go . thank you .
Downloading now. Any notable differences over your eb16 kernel?
Hi Adrynalyne!
Just installed. Everything's looking good so far. Will need more time with it though. Thanks.
Installing now. Hopefully no explosions =P
EDIT: I've played with it for 5 or 10 minutes now. Seems quite nice. I'll test the battery and all that fun stuff tomorrow.
Thanks adrynalyne.
Curious about this, however my battery is just settling in on EB01 so ill wait and see what everyone thinks...
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
A description of features would be nice, thanks!
Downloading and installing
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Same here, but since i'm still getting only 30hrs max on light usage I figure what the heck.... give it a try.
chargerfn909 said:
Curious about this, however my battery is just settling in on EB01 so ill wait and see what everyone thinks...
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is different from the [KERNEL][3.15.2011]EB16 Kernels?
Can we flash EC10 right over the EB16 Kernel?
Hotspot monitoring dummy kernel in both versions?
fitti28 said:
Can we flash EC10 right over the EB16 Kernel?
Hotspot monitoring dummy kernel in both versions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wiped both caches (dalvik+ regular) and then flashed right over EB16. No issues here.
I don't know about the monitoring dummy kernel but I'd be surprised if it wasn't in here.
MaskaMage said:
Same here, but since i'm still getting only 30hrs max on light usage I figure what the heck.... give it a try.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's excellent! I never go easy, between texting, this place, and the web in general in lucky to get 17 or so hours lol.. I can charge all day at work or whenever I need if I'm not going to be home though..
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
fitti28 said:
What is different from the [KERNEL][3.15.2011]EB16 Kernels?
Can we flash EC10 right over the EB16 Kernel?
Hotspot monitoring dummy kernel in both versions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should be fine flashing over eb16 but adrynalyn would have said they have the dummy file if they did. Plus they are very new (ec10 is code for march 10th 2011), so I doubt they have any mods yet.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
They have the dummy file.
There, I made you honest.
Not that it matters, but for those interested Quadrant scores (voodoo):
1470, 1593, 1659, 1641
So don't use your precious Quadrants as a reason to not install this
So an average quadrant of 1600??
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Flashed over SC 2.9.1 w/ stock EB01 kernel ... (non-voodoo here)
> Wifi still works! Already major improvement over the EB16s for me.
> *228/2 PRL update worked
> Still holding a wakelock on Gps Location Provider on boot, don't know if that has anything to do with the Kernel or not. Running a GPS app clears the lock just as it did before.
> Quadrant (non-voodoo): 946
So far so good. Will see how the battery is tomorrow.
cat /proc/version:
Linux version 2.6.32.9 ([email protected]) (gc version 4.4.1 (Sourcery G++ Lite 2009q3-67) ) #1 Thu Mar 10 12:52:44 KST 2011
Many thanks as always Adrynalyne!!
kuronosan said:
A description of features would be nice, thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
fitti28 said:
What is different from the [KERNEL][3.15.2011]EB16 Kernels?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Description:
It does mostly everything EB16 does, in mostly the same way.
Unfortunately, Verizon isn't nice enough to include a changelog in their leaked beta internal release software.
There seems to be a misunderstanding about what happens when stock beta kernels are leaked. Maybe people are coming from devices that have custom compiled kernels, where the kernel dev actually helped modify the source code. In this case, yes, a dev will know most everything about said kernel.
This is not the case with leaked stock kernels (or any leaked data). The person who posts the leaked data is rarely an active part of development with the pre-compiled source code. They usually can only see exactly what you see: a compiled binary file. They usually install them on their phone, do some general testing to make sure basic functionality is intact, then they give them to the public.
That's where the public comes in. There are virtually infinite amounts of configurations on everyones' phones. The leaker usually only has one phone. If they are thorough, they MAY test it in a few different environments. Everyone has something unique about their set up or something that they really care about and notice about the behavior of their phone. However, no dev or even a small group of beta testers have the time or resources to test every single application/configuration/feature.
On top of this, the public wants immediate leaks ("You've been running something newer than me?! I WANT IT NOW"). They want the bleeding edge, without any of the bleeding edge problems. This creates a conflict between someone sitting on a leak for too long vs. thoroughly testing a kernel.
So if that's too long of a story, or I haven't made myself clear, I offer this summary: You are the beta testers. You are the changelog writers. You find out the description of features. The leaker merely leaks. Someone who actually cares a bit about public safety/performance (like Adryn) will take an additional step and optimize/mod/lightly test. But after that, the public is just one giant test group, and this is the way it is supposed to be.
If that scares anyone, they are welcome to wait a while and read through people's reports of their experiences with the kernel. If that is still too scary, then I hear that Verizon might be releasing this software on the 12th of Never.
And just in case I hurt anyone's feelings, I'm not singling you two out, and I'm not flaming you. This is a general public post aimed at addressing the overall concern behind this issue that comes up in every new dev thread. You both seem genuine and non-confrontational, but there is a wide range of people who come into these types of threads and whine and complain. So it's nearly guaranteed that someone else will enter and be like "OMG guize my phone iz broked how come you didnt say phone is broked???!!!!!" Then, everyone can point to this post.
GizmoDroid said:
Description:
It does mostly everything EB16 does, in mostly the same way.
Unfortunately, Verizon isn't nice enough to include a changelog in their leaked beta internal release software.
There seems to be a misunderstanding about what happens when stock beta kernels are leaked. Maybe people are coming from devices that have custom compiled kernels, where the kernel dev actually helped modify the source code. In this case, yes, a dev will know most everything about said kernel.
This is not the case with leaked stock kernels (or any leaked data). The person who posts the leaked data is rarely an active part of development with the pre-compiled source code. They usually can only see exactly what you see: a compiled binary file. They usually install them on their phone, do some general testing to make sure basic functionality is intact, then they give them to the public.
That's where the public comes in. There are virtually infinite amounts of configurations on everyones' phones. The leaker usually only has one phone. If they are thorough, they MAY test it in a few different environments. Everyone has something unique about their set up or something that they really care about and notice about the behavior of their phone. However, no dev or even a small group of beta testers have the time or resources to test every single application/configuration/feature.
On top of this, the public wants immediate leaks ("You've been running something newer than me?! I WANT IT NOW"). They want the bleeding edge, without any of the bleeding edge problems. This creates a conflict between someone sitting on a leak for too long vs. thoroughly testing a kernel.
So if that's too long of a story, or I haven't made myself clear, I offer this summary: You are the beta testers. You are the changelog writers. You find out the description of features. The leaker merely leaks. Someone who actually cares a bit about public safety/performance (like Adryn) will take an additional step and optimize/mod/lightly test. But after that, the public is just one giant test group, and this is the way it is supposed to be.
If that scares anyone, they are welcome to wait a while and read through people's reports of their experiences with the kernel. If that is still too scary, then I hear that Verizon might be releasing this software on the 12th of Never.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very nicely said. But i think most of the time when people ask they are not trying to be rude or annoying. They are just not aware or hoping the person who leaked it might have the changelog as well.
Thanks adrynalyne...
I know I will almost indefinitely be flamed for asking this, but oh well here goes.
When I first got my AT&T SGS2, I installed an international rom (villain) It ran perfectly fine other than the fact calls were not operating properly. I immediately jumped ship though scared for my phone's life. I reflashed stock and AT&T modem, but now that I think back on it- wouldn't having flashed the at&t modem remedied that problem? and if truly need be couldn't an at&t version kernel be flashed( i.e. Entropy's DD) Everything seemed to operate perfectly fine (install went well, booted properly, smooth homescreen, apps running great)
In theory, replacing kernel/modem (and making sure the ROM doesn't include a bootloader) should work - however this is untested.
I'm going to be trying it tonight with SensatioN, as I did like that ROM when "hellraised" on Infuse and someone requested it, and it's about time someone tries to do a "hellraise" on an I9100 ROM.
Entropy512 said:
In theory, replacing kernel/modem (and making sure the ROM doesn't include a bootloader) should work - however this is untested.
I'm going to be trying it tonight with SensatioN, as I did like that ROM when "hellraised" on Infuse and someone requested it, and it's about time someone tries to do a "hellraise" on an I9100 ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You go entropy. Awesome. I will be glad to test it for you if needed.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Very cool! I more or less figured as much but i'm not quite that daring. I would be willing to do testing as well ( Oh and Entropy, Sensation was the rom I was looking at ) I too came over from the Infuse.(Thanks for all the kernel love!)
Hammersuit said:
Very cool! I more or less figured as much but i'm not quite that daring. I would be willing to do testing as well ( Oh and Entropy, Sensation was the rom I was looking at ) I too came over from the Infuse.(Thanks for all the kernel love!)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1328110 - Once I get permission to do so from the SensatioN ROM dev, I'll post it in dev as a proof-of-concept with details of what I did to port it.
Note that I don't have too much time to continue maintenance of a ROM - it's not where my skillset lies and between Real Life and kernel work, I'm pretty busy as is! But at least this will provide a starting point for those that want to go further.
Entropy512 said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1328110 - Once I get permission to do so from the SensatioN ROM dev, I'll post it in dev as a proof-of-concept with details of what I did to port it.
Note that I don't have too much time to continue maintenance of a ROM - it's not where my skillset lies and between Real Life and kernel work, I'm pretty busy as is! But at least this will provide a starting point for those that want to go further.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you're correct bro. ports from i9100 roms are very possible. the one thing you will need to do is change some of the lib and bin files to rid the issues with the mic on in calls. i think ive successfully ported just about most of the i9100 dev section so far. lol. for personal use only. if you need some help just let me know.
Entropy512 said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1328110 - Once I get permission to do so from the SensatioN ROM dev, I'll post it in dev as a proof-of-concept with details of what I did to port it.
Note that I don't have too much time to continue maintenance of a ROM - it's not where my skillset lies and between Real Life and kernel work, I'm pretty busy as is! But at least this will provide a starting point for those that want to go further.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha! Completely understandable. Thank you so much though, this proof-of-concept is wonderful news. It would be most beneficial to see some ports of well-supported GT-I9100 roms such as villain and DLEV rom etc.
Looks like there might be some known issues with my PoC port then... as I said, I haven't tested outgoing audio much (this is much harder for me to test than dialing voicemail...)
task650 said:
you're correct bro. ports from i9100 roms are very possible. the one thing you will need to do is change some of the lib and bin files to rid the issues with the mic on in calls. i think ive successfully ported just about most of the i9100 dev section so far. lol. for personal use only. if you need some help just let me know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which files are those? I tried to find the relevant CM7 commit (since they had mic issues in calls) but couldn't find it.
I know that turning Samsung Noise Reduction off (or on? It's freaking unclear whether "on" is the current state or destination state in the menus) seems to work around the problem on a per-call basis.
Entropy512 said:
Which files are those? I tried to find the relevant CM7 commit (since they had mic issues in calls) but couldn't find it.
I know that turning Samsung Noise Reduction off (or on? It's freaking unclear whether "on" is the current state or destination state in the menus) seems to work around the problem on a per-call basis.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I get home tonight ill look at which files I had to replace for dlev rom and shoot them over to you. Might be tomorrow depending on how late though bro.
Will the rom itself have that added or do I need to manually upgrade to 2.3.6?
mmtrago said:
Will the rom itself have that added or do I need to manually upgrade to 2.3.6?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2 completely different roms.
you have a bit of reading to do i think if you dont understand that.
Pirateghost said:
2 completely different roms.
you have a bit of reading to do i think if you dont understand that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ur right...I'm an idiot...I guess to the Q&A part of this forum isn't for retarded questions..I'm going to not read more and go outside to play sports
mmtrago said:
Ur right...I'm an idiot...I guess to the Q&A part of this forum isn't for retarded questions..I'm going to not read more and go outside to play sports
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
heres the skinny:
if you dont have time to read, comprehend, and understand what you are doing to your phone, you dont need to do anything to it.
if you want to get pissy because you didnt understand the difference between a firmware version and a rom, then fine. this website is not here to 'make your phone cool'
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=2031989&postcount=45
I'm hoping that the dev for UnNamed will incorporate a newer 2.3.6 or 2.3.7 base for their roms soon for further development. Maybe they're waiting for ICS like most other Devs?
mmtrago said:
Will the rom itself have that added or do I need to manually upgrade to 2.3.6?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The ROM Dev has to recreate the ROM on that base. Currently UnNamed is based off 2.3.4 and the dev will have to redo all his mods he incorporated in the 2.3.4 base into the new 2.3.6 base or other..... which he decides if at all. So basically you are at the mercy of the rom dev.
Don't worry about pirateghost..... he's been here a while and has too many questions like these.
shoman94 said:
Don't worry about pirateghost..... he's been here a while and has too many questions like these.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, i probably need to take a break....i get agitated too easily these days.
Pirateghost said:
yeah, i probably need to take a break....i get agitated too easily these days.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's those skyrocket forums. They're gettin to ya
Lol, they're actually not that bad. Got a crazy moderator that seems a bit lock thread crazy. But if it helps keep it clean I guess.
Just think happy thoughts of getting a new phone next week
Sent from my páhhōniē
Pirateghost said:
yeah, i probably need to take a break....i get agitated too easily these days.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I feel ya... I've had to do it myself.
shoman94 said:
The ROM Dev has to recreate the ROM on that base. Currently UnNamed is based off 2.3.4 and the dev will have to redo all his mods he incorporated in the 2.3.4 base into the new 2.3.6 base or other..... which he decides if at all. So basically you are at the mercy of the rom dev.
Don't worry about pirateghost..... he's been here a while and has too many questions like these.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
gtg's policy is just like mine - Unless there is a MAJOR reason to rebase on a leak, we don't do it. Leaks are a major hassle for ROM developers (and kernel devs) unless the leak offers a major feature. UXKG3 (Rogers Gingerbread) for the Infuse was such a ****ty release it actually did make sense to pull stuff from the AT&T leaks, however, completely rebasing onto them caused tons of problems for gtg (broken GPS, broken modems, wonky data, etc.) when he tried to pull in too much. In the end all he did was pull the camera libs (the only significant improvement).
So you'll see UnNamed move to 2.3.6 or 2.3.7 when an official AT&T update comes out based on it, or a MAJOR feature shows up (and even then, it's more likely to just get backported like the camera libs on Infuse.)
Entropy512 said:
gtg's policy is just like mine - Unless there is a MAJOR reason to rebase on a leak, we don't do it. Leaks are a major hassle for ROM developers (and kernel devs) unless the leak offers a major feature. UXKG3 (Rogers Gingerbread) for the Infuse was such a ****ty release it actually did make sense to pull stuff from the AT&T leaks, however, completely rebasing onto them caused tons of problems for gtg (broken GPS, broken modems, wonky data, etc.) when he tried to pull in too much. In the end all he did was pull the camera libs (the only significant improvement).
So you'll see UnNamed move to 2.3.6 or 2.3.7 when an official AT&T update comes out based on it, or a MAJOR feature shows up (and even then, it's more likely to just get backported like the camera libs on Infuse.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for being helpful and taking the time to explain yourself! you dont get that much around here
Well when people see you post things like
mmtrago said:
Ur right...I'm an idiot...I guess to the Q&A part of this forum isn't for retarded questions..I'm going to not read more and go outside to play sports
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it doesn't make people want to go out of their way for you.
Doesn't mean we won't, as most of us are here because we like helping out. Entropy512 usually goes above and beyond for most everybody. Creepyncrawly and Pirateghost just as much.
Check out their profiles and see how much they post and what they post as to how much they go out of their way to help.
Not to mention everyone else.
Sent from my páhhōniē
mmtrago said:
thanks for being helpful and taking the time to explain yourself! you dont get that much around here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then you're not on xda much bro. Tons of people help around here.
Hello, noob here! My OTA update failed so I installed UnNamed v2.1.1 (Based on UCKK6, Android 2.3.6). Everything works fine, but I notice that scroll-bounce effect (the bouncing at the end of scrolling) is replaced by a glow. Anyone knows if this also happens to the official UCKK6 update? I would love to have the scroll-bounce back without going back to stock Android 2.3.4
corrupteddata said:
Hello, noob here! My OTA update failed so I installed UnNamed v2.1.1 (Based on UCKK6, Android 2.3.6). Everything works fine, but I notice that scroll-bounce effect (the bouncing at the end of scrolling) is replaced by a glow. Anyone knows if this also happens to the official UCKK6 update? I would love to have the scroll-bounce back without going back to stock Android 2.3.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I know stock kk6 did that so no, he did say it might be added as an addon later
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Nick281051 said:
As far as I know stock kk6 did that so no, he did say it might be added as an addon later
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sounds good. Thanks.
I think its time to change the theme of this post, as the original question has been answered.
New Topic-What do we need from Samsung to create the closest to perfect rom for this phone?
PM me if you want Samsung to give us what we need, so we can show them that its wanted.
Also you can hit my thanks button just because : )
and i quote
"because you touch yourself"
oh man
Do we have anyone over 3 in here?
im actually 4.
Hey Bro
Well we need to promote creating a perfect 2.2.1 rom, because only then can we improve on GB and ICS!
mkcbbusiness said:
Well we need to promote creating a perfect 2.2.1 rom, because only then can we improve on GB and ICS!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...No that makes NO sense at all.
How would improving a 2.2 help with anything on GB or ICS?
Also no ROM can ever be perfect since our GPS is screwed and it works for some doesn't work for others.
Some ROMS 911 doesn't work.
There are issues that the developers just cannot fix without a bit of help from Samsung.
mkcbbusiness said:
Well we need to promote creating a perfect 2.2.1 rom, because only then can we improve on GB and ICS!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree...we also need Microsoft to create a perfect win98 before of giving us win7.
Theory
Listen the theory is to stabilize areas there where we already have degrees of stability will help us more easily figure out other problems. Its like playing minesweeper, you eventually get good and are able to beat the harder levels. Nothing is impossible even without the help of samsung. Have some faith in the skill of our developers here bros.
Although I see where you're coming from, but just know there's major updates in the way things work from 2.2(.1) -> 2.3 -> 4.0.
Honestly, devs have gotten really far with the bits and pieces we have.
We'll never have a perfect 2.2.1 or 2.3 or 4.0, why? Because devs can't pull correct drivers out of thin air, if Samsung or T-Mobile actually supported us, it'd be a hell of a lot easier.
So, honestly.. I dun know why you're saying we should perfect 2.2.1, it's outdated, it's old.. it's a completely different base than ICS, so that comparison doesn't work.
we never had a perfect donut rom either.....
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
theexel said:
Although I see where you're coming from, but just know there's major updates in the way things work from 2.2(.1) -> 2.3 -> 4.0.
Honestly, devs have gotten really far with the bits and pieces we have.
We'll never have a perfect 2.2.1 or 2.3 or 4.0, why? Because devs can't pull correct drivers out of thin air, if Samsung or T-Mobile actually supported us, it'd be a hell of a lot easier.
So, honestly.. I dun know why you're saying we should perfect 2.2.1, it's outdated, it's old.. it's a completely different base than ICS, so that comparison doesn't work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You bring out very valid points. Here is what I believe about that, the vibrant itself runs best on 2.2.1, and while the others are fun they will always be laggy. I'm not says the devs are not doing good, these are very intelligent people. I just believe that we need to get the rom working at 100‰ and if we can't 99 ‰ not including the GPS. The GPS we can overlook but force closes and other things shouldn't be a part of it. I think that moving on without completion will create a bad habit. Its like not finishing building a house and moving to build the bigger one. I don't mean to argue, I just like healthy discussion. : )
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Not sure which 2.2.1 rom you have been using but i never had a single issue on bi winning, in fact when i just need something good and reliable it's what i go back to
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Yeah, and I completely agree, I dun think devs should release a million different ROMs with the same bugs. So, on that end, I agree with you. I'd rather have a million updates of one ROM than have a million half-ass working ROMs. But, I don't think we should leave it to only 2.2.1 ROMs, some are working on 2.2.1, others on 2.3, and others on 4.0.
I can agree with that, I think we need to find a way to get the devs to collaborate on all the levels so that we can get some sweet custom roms flowing through the forums.... and I think I have an idea.... : )
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
mkcbbusiness said:
You bring out very valid points. Here is what I believe about that, the vibrant itself runs best on 2.2.1, and while the others are fun they will always be laggy. I'm not says the devs are not doing good, these are very intelligent people. I just believe that we need to get the rom working at 100‰ and if we can't 99 ‰ not including the GPS. The GPS we can overlook but force closes and other things shouldn't be a part of it. I think that moving on without completion will create a bad habit. Its like not finishing building a house and moving to build the bigger one. I don't mean to argue, I just like healthy discussion. : )
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Completely disagree with you there. "Others are fun they will always be laggy."
I honestly don't know if you've ever tried any GB or ICS rom.
NONE of them are "laggy" sure they have their moments when you're running 50 apps and they lag, no ****, so does Froyo. Do you realize that a ICS rom (passion) has gotten GPS to work for nearly everyone? Froyo roms aren't even CLOSE to that. No one thats tech-savvy wants to stay on Froyo, froyo is last years OS, we all want ICS and thats what the devs like. They like challenges, and we like the outcome.
What I'M trying to say is.. why stay on a old-os when we have a new one thats available and we've already accomplished so much on it in such a short time (ex. GPS)
Well I have used them all my friend, and they are laggy no much how we deny it. So lets build this Tom house!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
mkcbbusiness said:
Well I have used them all my friend, and they are laggy no much how we deny it. So lets build this Tom house!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suspect your phone has **** inside it.
Please open the cover and remove the battery and check for any signs of ****.
You must be in the denial stage of the whole thing.
ICS has absolute no lag when doing normal things and when it does lag, its because well.. this ics wasn't built from a vibrant source like froyo is.
Ask anyone.
You certainly have not tried ics passion.
If you did, make sure there's no **** in your phone.
Everyone who tried ics says its fast, and if they do leave its because of 911 issue or the phone mute unmute issue.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
Ics has less lag than any froyo rom.
Well I guess well agree to disagree. There is no need to come up with some smart allic response with no real reasoning behind it just because you have a mouth. I'm just saying with this phone ics yes even ics passion lags, maybe not on the galaxy s 2, but with the vibrant it does. Maybe your right, that it wont lag when we get a vibrant build of ics. But for now, those are the facts. Thank you for your contribution though. : )
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
mkcbbusiness said:
Well I guess well agree to disagree. There is no need to come up with some smart allic response with no real reasoning behind it just because you have a mouth. I'm just saying with this phone ics yes even ics passion lags, maybe not on the galaxy s 2, but with the vibrant it does. Maybe your right, that it wont lag when we get a vibrant build of ics. But for now, those are the facts. Thank you for your contribution though. : )
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Passion lags.
Onecosmic's has zero lag.
You are simply wrong. Very very wrong.
I'm looking for a rom that is similar to the Look of MIUI (obviously nothing will be very similar) but maybe something resembles it in some ways. I've recognized that there are 2 tpos of roms, the ones that follow the generic, gingerbread frame, or ICS frame (aokp, unamed, phonebricker, ICSrewed, CM7/9 etc.) and then MIUI, who kinda does their own design. I've been partial to MIUI ever since I laid my hands on it.
Reason why I'm asking for a look-a-like is because I've been running the scottish one for some time (1.11.9) but she's had the no service bug issue for some time now where everytime I attempt to make a call, 80% of the time it'll lose service and it takes like 4 tries or so till my call goes through. Unacceptable. Yet I can't keep myself away from the build. It's just so speedy. Wish I could have a more recent build for my I777 but I can't find one anywhere. I've also tried a million builds for the regular MIUI, 2.2.3 V2 being the most recent one I could find (I believe that's the most recent? I literally searched for hours), but this build also has the same call service drop bug. Can't stand it.
Can anyone help with my situation? Currently running MIUI V4 ICS, and it's sweet and all but it's wrecking my brain with how slow it isss . Anything similar to MIUI or help with a fix or newer version. Mucho appreciated!!!
Btw I'm no noob to flashing, have flashed at least 20 different roms and all, just wondering if there is anything I missed...in terms of what I'm looking for. Cus I hate settling.
Any ics rom with miui launcher.
Look here :
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1623026
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Only half the story
ACCUSED24 said:
Any ics rom with miui launcher.
Look here :
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1623026
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I'm really looking for more than just a launcher though. I'm already aware of the creation of MIUI launcher and that's sweet but it doesn't encompass settings themes and notification draw down etc. I'm not super picky about that but I'd prefer everything to be uniform...so not gonna go with that method.
LewaOS is something i I'd call pretty similar to MIUI. Lilchris has a post of it in ported section.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Weee
Biporch said:
LewaOS is something i I'd call pretty similar to MIUI. Lilchris has a post of it in ported section.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey thanks a lot for the feedback! I knew someone had to have an idea of something with relatively theme intensive design.
In ported themes
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1533897
Closest thing to MIUI? An iPhone.
Biporch said:
LewaOS is something i I'd call pretty similar to MIUI. Lilchris has a post of it in ported section.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Porting JoyOS soon, hopefully based on ICS.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA
Virus1x said:
In ported themes
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1533897
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeahhh but I mentioned how I didn't like how slowww it was
Red5 said:
Closest thing to MIUI? An iPhone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahah yeah but I don't want that crap.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jB_gs4Adwp4&feature=relmfu
For other reasons too, but I figured these would be funny enough
EDIT
thinking i may try JoyOS once ported
Help Needed
You guys know of any other MIUI builds other than WIUI and Galnet, which I'd like a later version of but can't seem to find anywhere. PM me if you have anything past 1.11.9, PLEASEEEEE.
VanillaCracker said:
You guys know of any other MIUI builds other than WIUI and Galnet, which I'd like a later version of but can't seem to find anywhere. PM me if you have anything past 1.1.9, PLEASEEEEE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
really?
i mean, did you even open your eyes when you went into the dev section?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1521
Pirateghost said:
really?
i mean, did you even open your eyes when you went into the dev section?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1521
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Duddeeeeeeeeee. Just went back through it and found AdyScorpius' version of MIUI. I'd gone through that before but I guess I missed this version. If it's anything like Galnet I'm gonna be soooooo happy. I'm gonna flash it now!! So excited hahah. I'm a speed freak, need my lag free interface, otherwise I get annoyed >.>
Thanks bro! Hope this rom isn't bug ridden. Seems very illegitimately put together, but all the people commend it! We'll see.
VanillaCracker said:
.... Seems very illegitimately put together, but all the people commend it! We'll see.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LMFAO.....
dude, its MIUI...it was built 'illegitimately' from the get-go...
Lol. If XDA ever gets a bus to drive us around in something tells me its gonna be a short bus.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Pirateghost said:
LMFAO.....
dude, its MIUI...it was built 'illegitimately' from the get-go...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahah idk, I was reading up on all these bugs that I haven't really heard of in the general MIUI builds. I'm using it though and it's snappy pappy. Except going back from a conversation message, to just the conversation list. It reverts quickly, but the text doesn't load as quick as the transition. Annoyanceeeee lol. Idc though...sorta. Is good though. Is real good. Wondering if it's worth bumpin up to ICS V4 cus I didn't realize RIUI and AdyScorp were making roms like this. Trying to decide whether upgrading is worth the stupid notification swipe or not. So annoying.
VanillaCracker said:
I'm looking for a rom that is similar to the Look of MIUI (obviously nothing will be very similar) but maybe something resembles it in some ways. I've recognized that there are 2 tpos of roms, the ones that follow the generic, gingerbread frame, or ICS frame (aokp, unamed, phonebricker, ICSrewed, CM7/9 etc.) and then MIUI, who kinda does their own design. I've been partial to MIUI ever since I laid my hands on it.
Reason why I'm asking for a look-a-like is because I've been running the scottish one for some time (1.11.9) but she's had the no service bug issue for some time now where everytime I attempt to make a call, 80% of the time it'll lose service and it takes like 4 tries or so till my call goes through. Unacceptable. Yet I can't keep myself away from the build. It's just so speedy. Wish I could have a more recent build for my I777 but I can't find one anywhere. I've also tried a million builds for the regular MIUI, 2.2.3 V2 being the most recent one I could find (I believe that's the most recent? I literally searched for hours), but this build also has the same call service drop bug. Can't stand it.
Can anyone help with my situation? Currently running MIUI V4 ICS, and it's sweet and all but it's wrecking my brain with how slow it isss . Anything similar to MIUI or help with a fix or newer version. Mucho appreciated!!!
Btw I'm no noob to flashing, have flashed at least 20 different roms and all, just wondering if there is anything I missed...in terms of what I'm looking for. Cus I hate settling.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MIUI sucks because it is so slow and in development. The only thing that is great about it is it's interconnected community and even app. Which is all JUST SHOW if you know how to flash your own ROMs.
If you want speed, battery, and best overall flawlessness I suggest: shostock!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1563747
It's the best. Just needs an android app so I know when it updates.
megamorphg said:
Just needs an android app so I know when it updates.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
An android app like what MIUI has?
megamorphg said:
MIUI sucks because it is so slow and in development. The only thing that is great about it is it's interconnected community and even app. Which is all JUST SHOW if you know how to flash your own ROMs.
If you want speed, battery, and best overall flawlessness I suggest: shostock!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1563747
It's the best. Just needs an android app so I know when it updates.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have nothing against all the Samsung Touchwiz based Roms. I just plain don't like em. I have two things that I need personally, and that is speed, and an appealing look/design. Although CM7/CM9 can have a...functional/sophisticated look to them, they aren't quite as unique and sophisticated as the MIUI themes. Namely, CM is all very square and proper, while MIUI seems to be a little more accommodating if you will. I like to speed through things, and I'm particular about the way I do things. For example: when texting someone I like to send a text, then go back to the conversation list, so that when I get a new text I can see who it was from. I used UnNamed rom for a little bit (a month maybe) - and also tried ShoStock because I'd heard a lot about that too. I flashed it, but it basically seemed to be the same thing. Anyway when using unnamed there was obvious lag interface between the message system when I'd press back twice really quick after sending a text (once to close keyboard, once to close keyboard, another to go back to conversation list). MIUI is more smooth in it's transition and seems to have not necesarilly more poignant scirpting but mayhaps faster. I like MIUI's notification bar and status bar. I like how the notifications have a page and I can click my wifi, data, airplane mode, gps, rotation, and brightness all on the same page, without having to swipe left or right to find more. Mostly I'm a fan of the themes of course, since they simply look awesome. If you care so much move to AOKP, it's better than any Samsung Touchwiz Rom I've ever used, for that type of person. I love AOKP, but I can't seem to stand the crude looking toggles/switches, and the damn launcer (all 3 of them). I find app drawers to be very unnecessary (my own personal opinion - plenty of interpretations there). But I'm willing to further discuss this if you want haha. No mean to be insulting but you basically started the engagement