hey all,
just wondering...
- what is the current status for getting custom kernels running on the x10 mini / mini pro?
- has development of a kexec module or something similar begun based on code written for other phones?
- if so, does anybody know how far people have gotten? what difficulties are we facing at the moment in those regards?
i'm wondering because if nobody has started working on a kexec module then i thought i might try, but if someone is already working on it then i'd be glad to lend a hand if needed / if i can...
cheers,
uriah
uriahheep said:
hey all,
just wondering...
- what is the current status for getting custom kernels running on the x10 mini / mini pro?
- has development of a kexec module or something similar begun based on code written for other phones?
- if so, does anybody know how far people have gotten? what difficulties are we facing at the moment in those regards?
i'm wondering because if nobody has started working on a kexec module then i thought i might try, but if someone is already working on it then i'd be glad to lend a hand if needed / if i can...
cheers,
uriah
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here is the development thread for bootloader bypassing (on x8, but our phones are "twined" )
it is a dev thread, so don't post anything unless you're a dev.
link is here
answers to your questions may be there
i cant put the link cause my post, but u can serarch this in google
"how to build a linux kernel" sony ericsson
is from the original dev SE team
burnice said:
i cant put the link cause my post, but u can serarch this in google
"how to build a linux kernel" sony ericsson
is from the original dev SE team
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this link is only for open bootloader.
it is unuseful for now ^^
here is the link you are talking about: blogs.sonyericsson.com/wp/2011/05/06/how-to-build-a-linux-kernel/
wht z a kexec module?
death_syndrome said:
wht z a kexec module?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a kexec module is a kernel module which reconstructs the kexec functionality (which allows one to execute a kernel from within another kernel) that the linux kernel can have. usually kexec support needs to be built into the kernel (i.e. not a module), but by loading modules such as splboot (which is the kexec module that is being developed in the X8 bootloader bypassing thread based on work that was done for the X10) one can execute a kernel from within the current kernel even if kexec support wasn't built into it.
[EDIT] actually, splboot doesn't exactly reconstruct kexec support, but does something similar. see this post and the few that follow for more details.
Related
Can we expect Dell to release the kernel source? Are they required to release it?
Yes.......
they are supposed to release it ...
weather they do is another thing...
and if they don't who's gona fight em ... no one can afford it
http://gpl-violations.org/
how do we tell them that we want the source of dell and get them to get it??
@MattAtDell tweeted the other day in reply to some other random user that he would look into it, so its a good outlook that the kernel source will be made available... This will probably be the first phone I'd be willing to try and build a kernel for, lol. I'm sure we'd have a vanilla build of Android 2.1 (probably a bit broken) already IF we had the kernel source, 1.6 and 2.1 run the same kernel version 2.6.29 (froyo is 2.6.32 so it might actually take a bit more effort). This also explains why they show a 2.1 build even though they've committed to go straight to 2.2.
Random user my arse..
He was the first one from Dell that bothered to respond to *MY*query.
You can already build a vanilla froyo including kernel, but its taking a lot of experimenting to get a working combination of settings (I'm using the codearoura (qualcomm) surf ) git..
I may try a generic android git to see if it works..
jmhalder said:
@MattAtDell tweeted the other day in reply to some other random user that he would look into it, so its a good outlook that the kernel source will be made available... This will probably be the first phone I'd be willing to try and build a kernel for, lol. I'm sure we'd have a vanilla build of Android 2.1 (probably a bit broken) already IF we had the kernel source, 1.6 and 2.1 run the same kernel version 2.6.29 (froyo is 2.6.32 so it might actually take a bit more effort). This also explains why they show a 2.1 build even though they've committed to go straight to 2.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any success compiling a kernel 2.6.33+ for Streak?
Any success compiling a kernel for Dell Streak? Where to start for it? I've been trying cyanogen kernels, but they don't seem to work or maybe I am doing something wrong creating the boot.img file. Any doc for it?
Thanks in advance!
Kernel source for Dell Streak?
Hi,
I was wondering whether the android kernel uses some kind of standardized kernel versions and configurations that allow people to add a module to an existing kernel in, let's say a dell streak tablet/smartphone.
Is it easy to get the kernel configuration and patches to compile modules for the streak?
Do they put some kind of locking so that nobody having a jtag tool can make the configuration changes to make the kernel read a new module?
jsmanrique said:
Any success compiling a kernel for Dell Streak? Where to start for it? I've been trying cyanogen kernels, but they don't seem to work or maybe I am doing something wrong creating the boot.img file. Any doc for it?
Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ive had lots of success in building kernels, its just that none of them boot!
(technically I think this is known as not succeeding )
Building != Booting
So we have same situation... It's not a matter of building a kernel but booting it right on the device.
But what would be failing? Has anybody seen any log about what is happenning during boot to know what is failing? Because I would understand that a valid kernel would boot the device but some parts that would need propietary code wouldn't work (for example wifi, or whatever)... but no boot at all is quite strange.
Can anyone confirm at least a successful module compiling/running?
Not me
maxrfon said:
Can anyone confirm at least a successful module compiling/running?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not me! Is it really impossible the get it running?
If you ask dell for the linux source code, they must provide it. They have to make the exact source code available that can be used to compile the shipped binaries.
If they won't make it available upon request go inquire with http://gpl-violations.org as recommended earlier.
hey dcordes glad to see you here, I have asked via a few avenues, but was waiting till its available in the USA before pressing them further
theres a Guy popped up on modaco yesterday that thinks the boot.img needs 2k page file but 4k padding and suggested some changes to makeimg to get it to boot properly.
I'll play again later on
quiet bump, tweet by me:
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/3g0ebt
I also put something on twitter.
If you are as pissed as everybody about the lack of the sources, go write a mail to https://lists.gpl-violations.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
They are the attorney to each user of GPL licensed software ! They will tell you what to do. If you browse the archives they will advise to keep asking for sources. We did that. No it's time to collect evidence of the ignored requests and take further steps.
But first we should let that mailing list know ! If nobody will mail it in the next few days I will. I don't have the device but I hate industry going ignorant on customers. It is also an insult to everybody working on the Linux kernel source code. And that's many and includes myself.
cheers
dcordes said:
But first we should let that mailing list know ! If nobody will mail it in the next few days I will. I don't have the device but I hate industry going ignorant on customers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do have the device.
http://lists.gpl-violations.org/pipermail/legal/2010-September/002235.html
This is a dev thread. Do not install this release unless you know what you're doing. Do not post if you have nothing to contribute.
This is very early build, we're behind other qsd8k devices but will eventually catch up
Big thanks to all qsd8k developers working on this (N1, Desire, HD2, X10).
[KERNEL]
- ol' good 2.6.29-SEMC
- fixed touchscreen driver (now backward-compatibile with Gingerbread)
[ROM]
- partially based on drewis release (thanks!) - currently I don't have access to PC that could handle compilation of the whole thing
If someone could compile clean es209ra build and upload it would be awesome.
[WORKING]
- it boots
- radio, calls, txt (sms)
- audio partially working (in-call is fine, playing mp3/ringtones leads to WLOD)
- bluetooth, GPS seem to work
- wifi almost working ("can't find wlan0 device")
- mobile data (it gets IP but disconects afterwards, needs investiagtion)
[NOT WORKING]
- most of the stuff does not work
- quite unstable
[SOURCES]
Will upload all of the useful code/fixes here.
- ICS + GB compatibile touch driver: es209ra_touch_mt.c
- compatibile ramdisk (props FXP): http://www.mediafire.com/?1n51pn1upwv79ur
[DOWNLOAD]
Alpha1 ROM (for CWM5) + corresponding kernel (flashtool) is here:
http://www.mediafire.com/?ht6p6tbpj2988d4
Cheers,
z
Just did a major clean up on this thread mates....no more "thanks" posts please. If thankful... click the thanks button.
Regards,
M_T_M
Finally we get it. aZuZu is working on ASOP ICS 4.0.1. This may help him work easier. So with locked bootloader, can we flash cause' you wrote there CWM5?
VIDEO
here's a video for ics on x10 alpha build 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsOFn4YLvZU
@frosty666 please kindly include this on your ics discussion thread.
thankz
hi zdzihu, its great to see you back! is this only temporary or, are you going to be more active, like before?
mmmkay, I'm not dev, but I want to ask if you're compiling this from ground up (like Jerpelea's CM7), or you're like just mashup of current SE and ICS sources. if its a mashup, I can help. but I do very little design from ground up things.
Sent from my X10i using xda premium
if you have fixed audio hw sources i could recompile..
altho i have complete es209ra compile with ics hw, old cm gralloc / copybit sources and generic audio..
So for me doesn't even boot
As i came from night shift i will try later on more...
Here you are libhardware.so, libhardware_legacy.so & wpa_supplicant from my compiled ICS build so if someone can boot z rom maybe it could test this too
p.s.
it is searching ar6000.ko as normal stock one not wifi.ko as sdk port
aZuZu said:
So for me doesn't even boot
As i came from night shift i will try later on more...
Here you are libhardware.so, libhardware_legacy.so & wpa_supplicant from my compiled ICS build so if someone can boot z rom maybe it could test this too
p.s.
it is searching ar6000.ko as normal stock one not wifi.ko as sdk port
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Azuzu, I am able to compile single libs and binaries (libhw_legacy, supplicant), it's just dex and stuff causing problems (1GB of ram + 1.6GHz). As for libaudio, I will take a look soon
Cheers,
z
I help if u want
Hello guys, I'm new to the forum and I hope to see well with you.
I would be willing to help compile the source since EXCLUSIVELY use only Linux operating system and is much easier to work on programming because most of the libraries are already installed by default, I hope I was clear.
greetings
Joseph
zdzihu said:
Hi Azuzu, I am able to compile single libs and binaries (libhw_legacy, supplicant), it's just dex and stuff causing problems (1GB of ram + 1.6GHz). As for libaudio, I will take a look soon
Cheers,
z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yaay Z!!!
glad to see back!
now i feel so bad & depressed that i dont have a working x10 with me
hope that service center guy is able to repair it again...
@aZuZu
can u please upload ur work-in-progress sources to git... i know how much fixing u have done... it might help other too
aZuZu said:
So for me doesn't even boot
As i came from night shift i will try later on more...
Here you are libhardware.so, libhardware_legacy.so & wpa_supplicant from my compiled ICS build so if someone can boot z rom maybe it could test this too
p.s.
it is searching ar6000.ko as normal stock one not wifi.ko as sdk port
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so good
I will try to build ICS this weekend!
I have no time this weekday
Zdzihu, if the wifi still reports the same error (can't find wlan0 device), it probably means that the kernel refers to wlan interface as eth0. Try changing the wifi.interface entry in build.prop to eth0.
little help for folks that compile ICS on weak pc
make: *** [out/target/common/obj/JAVA_LIBRARIES/framework_intermediates/noproguard.classes-with-local.dex] Killed << if processes during compile get killed try this script > Fix Swap
Well to me helped so maybe it helps other ppl.
Has anyone pulled this Kernel apart, i'm trying to lock down some of the touch screen info but I can't gunzip the ICS ramdisk...not even sure if i should be able to.
I GPIO the main files out, can't see anything pertinent in there, so I can only assume its in this ramdisk...biggest problem is that if it is a corrupted archive I can't get ubuntu to open a recovery tool cos it's implementation of the Zlib system sucks dice
WHAT IS IT WITH SOME OF YOU GUYS, IT IS DEV ONLY THREAD AT THE REQUEST OF THE DEVELOPER, IF YOU CAN'T FOLLOW SIMPLE RULES THEN INFRACTIONS WILL BE HANDED OUT, YOU HAVE NOW BEEN WARNED!
wbbigdave said:
Has anyone pulled this Kernel apart, i'm trying to lock down some of the touch screen info but I can't gunzip the ICS ramdisk...not even sure if i should be able to.
I GPIO the main files out, can't see anything pertinent in there, so I can only assume its in this ramdisk...biggest problem is that if it is a corrupted archive I can't get ubuntu to open a recovery tool cos it's implementation of the Zlib system sucks dice
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
gunzip -c <ramdisk.gz> | cpio -i
Cheers,
z
The next member who disregards a developers request and posts in a non helpful way will be banned for a week.
i encourage any dev or helpful member to pm me or any other mod with the offending post and the user will be dealt with
Please don't reply tp them to tell them they are breaking th rules as you post will then also be rule break worthy
Hugs and kisses
PiLoT
http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#q,status:merged+project:CyanogenMod/android_frameworks_base,n,z
sorry for posting here. but is for development. for ICS, can we used modified 2.6.29, and modify, like what zdzihu did, it so it 100% or do we have to use 3.x (or whatever) becuase I'm starting to do kernel mods and I want to see what I can contribution.
so in all, does the newest kernel have to be ported? or can we continue using good old 2.6.29 and keep Modding it? (hopefully camera will work, drivers have to be rewritten for kernel. and no one likr to write drivers)
Sent from my X10i using xda premium
In case, we can see here how they get the SD Card working
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=19774268#post19774268
Hello! I just recently got a brand new MyTouch4GSlide ($5 from t-mobile xD) Anyhow since the lack of development going on for this phone I decided to join in and do my part... My original plan was to create a simple CM7 Kernel with support for UV and OC + Smartass... I have successfully in the past week set up my ubuntu virtual machine, kernel source, kitchen (boot.img extract/compile), voltage table & have successfully compiled a custom working kernel for my device, but i just need a bit of help.... I have 3 specific questions wich hopefully someone will be able to answer so I may get better with developing and continue developing in the future...
1) Adding new frequencies to the kernel
-I have created my voltage table and have added it to the file acpuclock-8x60.c (Which is corresponding to my device) located in /arch/arm/mach-msm O have also disabled the performance lock in the .config file using the make menuconfig command but when I compile the kernel and flash it setcpu does not recognize the frequencies... Did I not edit the correct file? Am I missing a lock placed by HTC somewhere else?
2) Adding Smartass
-I have found 1 source for the smartass module but whenever I try to compile the module I get #define OFS_KALLSYMS_LOOKUP_NAME 0xc009684c // kallsyms_lookup_name any reason why this is? am I using the wrong source? is there an easier way?
3) WiFi Module
-Whenever I compile my kernel the WiFi does not turn on... Probably because I have not compiled a Wifi module -_- but how can I compile a WiFi module? do I use the same source as the kernel? how would I go about doing this? how do I pack it with the boot.img?
Thats all for now... I shall edit this if I have more questions... I shall constantly be checking this thread hoping for some responses... I am eager to get this working!
Thanks in advanced! ~GiGoO
P.S. If you want you may add me on Skype if you would like to help me with this xD (robster105)
gigoo25 said:
Hello! I just recently got a brand new MyTouch4GSlide ($5 from t-mobile xD) Anyhow since the lack of development going on for this phone I decided to join in and do my part... My original plan was to create a simple CM7 Kernel with support for UV and OC + Smartass... I have successfully in the past week set up my ubuntu virtual machine, kernel source, kitchen (boot.img extract/compile), voltage table & have successfully compiled a custom working kernel for my device, but i just need a bit of help.... I have 3 specific questions wich hopefully someone will be able to answer so I may get better with developing and continue developing in the future...
1) Adding new frequencies to the kernel
-I have created my voltage table and have added it to the file acpuclock-8x60.c (Which is corresponding to my device) located in /arch/arm/mach-msm O have also disabled the performance lock in the .config file using the make menuconfig command but when I compile the kernel and flash it setcpu does not recognize the frequencies... Did I not edit the correct file? Am I missing a lock placed by HTC somewhere else?
2) Adding Smartass
-I have found 1 source for the smartass module but whenever I try to compile the module I get #define OFS_KALLSYMS_LOOKUP_NAME 0xc009684c // kallsyms_lookup_name any reason why this is? am I using the wrong source? is there an easier way?
3) WiFi Module
-Whenever I compile my kernel the WiFi does not turn on... Probably because I have not compiled a Wifi module -_- but how can I compile a WiFi module? do I use the same source as the kernel? how would I go about doing this? how do I pack it with the boot.img?
Thats all for now... I shall edit this if I have more questions... I shall constantly be checking this thread hoping for some responses... I am eager to get this working!
Thanks in advanced! ~GiGoO
P.S. If you want you may add me on Skype if you would like to help me with this xD (robster105)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey Rob, I wish you the best of luck and don't give up!
The one thing I can say is when I was compiling my own kernels a while back and when I was trying to do the exact same thing and add different frequencies, if I remember correctly, there is a couple files that need to be changed, not just one, but don't quote me on that
I would also try getting help from other phone developers too. Post in the Q&A section of the phones, you might get more help that way.
Other then that good luck!
Questions or Problems Should Not Be Posted in the Development Forum
Please Post in the Correct Forums
Moving to Q&A
Guys,
I have a CM802 Android 2.2 tablet that I would like to support external USB devices. My problem right now is that the default ROM doesn't seem to have USB host drivers, and I have no idea where to look. Can you guys point me in the right direction?
Thanks!
I don't know your hardware, but your android version should have no support for both usb host mode and USB otg. If you upgrade and hardware is ready, maybe. But very likely you'll need the kernel USB modules sources and a dev to compile them especially for that build. That's why on my se xperia x10 such feature is still missing ...
The hardware has support for it, and I don't care what version of Android I end up with, as long as there's support. I also don't mind installing them myself, but would like some direction as to where to find the modules.
have you tried going to the manufactures website?
Wrycu said:
The hardware has support for it, and I don't care what version of Android I end up with, as long as there's support. I also don't mind installing them myself, but would like some direction as to where to find the modules.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You will need to compile a proper kernel with support for it. There have been a few on the site that have done it for a few devices but it is not an overly popular mod
Well, I have just seen a site where they sell the android 2.3 version of the same device which seems to have the USB otg support. In any case, the first step must be one upgrading at least to android 2.3...
lucaoldb said:
Well, I have just seen a site where they sell the android 2.3 version of the same device which seems to have the USB otg support. In any case, the first step must be one upgrading at least to android 2.3...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the kernel would have been made to support it on that device. After building 2.3 from android source code I can say that it is not there by default.
Thanks, I agree that is not supported by default but maybe they had actually patched a kernel with those modules, though such kind of sites are not very reliable...
zelendel said:
the kernel would have been made to support it on that device. After building 2.3 from android source code I can say that it is not there by default.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you guys link me to the modules or whatever? Again, I'm perfectly willing to build the kernel from source myself, as long as I can have a little direction.
Any help? Links, information, tutorials.. whatever you can give me would be awesome, Internet <3.
Oh, and sorry for the double post.
I have a LG P350 which development has stopped but i want to keep it updated, i have my computer ready for building, also i have kernel sources, Cyanogenmod 11 and 10.1 sources too, (I don't know exactly if 10.1 sources could help) and i know that i need to apply patches to work on Armv6 but i don't know how to apply them to the source code, also i don't know if i would just need the pure source code to build or i need to do more modifications to it and finally, i don't know if the rom would work with 2.36 kernel which it's the most stable one for this device, i'm very new in this but i know that i can keep update my little phone, thank you all in advance for help.
DiegoConD said:
I have a LG P350 which development has stopped but i want to keep it updated, i have my computer ready for building, also i have kernel sources, Cyanogenmod 11 and 10.1 sources too, (I don't know exactly if 10.1 sources could help) and i know that i need to apply patches to work on Armv6 but i don't know how to apply them to the source code, also i don't know if i would just need the pure source code to build or i need to do more modifications to it and finally, i don't know if the rom would work with 2.36 kernel which it's the most stable one for this device, i'm very new in this but i know that i can keep update my little phone, thank you all in advance for help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello, looking at your situation here is what I can conclude. First off you will need to change things for building on ARMv6 architecture, check this out for example. But your biggest problem will be that Android 4.0+ uses Linux kernel version 3.0+, and with the 2.36 kernel you have a lot of things will be broken and need fixing. That being said if your up for the challenge for it cause that's what were all about .
shimp208 said:
Hello, looking at your situation here is what I can conclude. First off you will need to change things for building on ARMv6 architecture, check this out for example. But your biggest problem will be that Android 4.0+ uses Linux kernel version 3.0+, and with the 2.36 kernel you have a lot of things will be broken and need fixing. That being said if your up for the challenge for it cause that's what were all about .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, i got this http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2144790 that is the most similar phone talking about hardware, it has 3.0 kernel working well so i thought i could port it, i found this http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15961306/porting-kernel-from-another-device so i think i would have less problems due hardware similarities (Look here http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=3516&idPhone2=3735 ) so, if i have cm11 pure sources, i add this kernel sources and some patches i would have it booting? Sorry for this very dumb question but, i didn't get at all about the armv6 part, how to apply patches, which i would need and all that, i really want to learn about this so thank you for this answer and the next ones :good:
DiegoConD said:
Well, i got this http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2144790 that is the most similar phone talking about hardware, it has 3.0 kernel working well so i thought i could port it, i found this http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15961306/porting-kernel-from-another-device so i think i would have less problems due hardware similarities (Look here http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=3516&idPhone2=3735 ) so, if i have cm11 pure sources, i add this kernel sources and some patches i would have it booting? Sorry for this very dumb question but, i didn't get at all about the armv6 part, how to apply patches, which i would need and all that, i really want to learn about this so thank you for this answer and the next ones :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The best way to start is use the ARMv6 branch of Cyanogenmod 11, replace the CM 10.1 in the previous linked build guide with cm-11.0 ("repo init -u git://github.com/androidarmv6/android.git -b cm-11.0"), and then to direct the build to use your kernel take a look at this guide on integrated kernel building with Cyanogenmod.