so yeah tell what you've experienced or what you think about this.
I've seen people experience higher neocore scores without sounds so I guess that's true.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
Feeshie said:
I've seen people experience higher neocore scores without sounds so I guess that's true.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well yeah i already know that i get 55 fps with sound and 60 without it!
but i meant experience based on when they're playing.
Hmmmm? Sound processing needs CPU cycles. Kinda obvious.
there wont be much difference in higher clocks such as 806 mhz, maybe 1.5 fps difference...
Related
i am consistently getting low Quadrant Benchmark scores on my SG2. is there a hardware fault with my device? my average score is 2800 and there is virtually nothing running in the background when performing the benchmark tests.
Does it fell slow? If not you shouldn't care, Quadrant is a pos.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
well, interestingly, gameplay isn't so great in asphalt 6 adrenaline samsung apps free version, and there is minimal lag when swiping between screens in apps folder (could be due to crappy screen protector)
but i've gone through more than one sg2 in the past, and this is the first one showing scores less than 3000. =(
I do occasionally get 3000-3200, but in most cases <3000 (even when doing 3-4 tests in a row)
There is a new option in settings called system power saving that limits the cpu to only 800mhz, try that.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
MaBlo said:
Does it fell slow? If not you shouldn't care, Quadrant is a pos.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1.
Quadrant is ****. Nuff said.
This may be a dumb question but has underclocking a CPU been shown to damage it at all? Be it longterm or short? I know excessive overclocking can take it's toll on the life of a processor and was just wondering if the opposite was true also.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Well I'll answer with my common sense: I don't see a negative effect on the chip. Underclocking too much could effect your performance and might cause reboots. Best way to go about it is trial and error. Find a stable setting and go from there.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
radrian92 said:
Well I'll answer with my common sense: I don't see a negative effect on the chip. Underclocking too much could effect your performance and might cause reboots. Best way to go about it is trial and error. Find a stable setting and go from there.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not asking about stability...I'm asking about actual damage. I'm aware of what underclocking does to phone performanne. I'm asking if someone knows either from experience or from information available somewhere if it can physically damage the processor...not just an assumption...but thank you anyhow.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Underclocking does not damage anything hardware wise. In fact all recent processors do it very often for energy efficiency reasons. Your phone its probably doing it right now. It will go to its stock rated speed (1 GHz for photon) when you run a game or something else system intensive and it will clock back down to 216 GHz (lowest stock rated speed) when you quit or anywhere imbetween depending on load.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
EDIT: Meant 216 MHz. Sorry.
MultiDev said:
Underclocking does not damage anything hardware wise. In fact all recent processors do it very often for energy efficiency reasons. Your phone its probably doing it right now. It will go to its stock rated speed (1 GHz for photon) when you run a game or something else system intensive and it will clock back down to 216 GHz (lowest stock rated speed) when you quit or anywhere imbetween depending on load.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy crud, 216 ghz????
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
You cant underclock below what it was designed for and my regular kernels keep voltage below safe values so.....
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
MultiDev said:
Underclocking does not damage anything hardware wise. In fact all recent processors do it very often for energy efficiency reasons. Your phone its probably doing it right now. It will go to its stock rated speed (1 GHz for photon) when you run a game or something else system intensive and it will clock back down to 216 GHz (lowest stock rated speed) when you quit or anywhere imbetween depending on load.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now this makes sense...thank you.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
magui43212 said:
Holy crud, 216 ghz????
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its 216 Mhz...lol
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Yeah it shouldn't really have to much of an effect seeing as you are basically allowing it to do less. Just as long as you are not running to much for it to handle at its underclocked speed.... In theory at least.
I run both OC and UC setups depending upon what I'm doing IE "Charging" or "Screen off". And I've yet to see any negative effects.
Well seeing uderclocking makes it so its "walking" instead of "running" so it should be able to keep its "breath" longer.. less stress does usally me longer life. So i would say it helps your phone life overall and battery life longer overall
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
No its like running with less weight
Damanis1 said:
Well seeing uderclocking makes it so its "walking" instead of "running" so it should be able to keep its "breath" longer.. less stress does usally me longer life. So i would say it helps your phone life overall and battery life longer overall
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
The quadrant scores are quite low on 2.3.3. Is 2.3.5 any better??
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA Premium App
install quadrant booster and it will spike high enough to even surpass sgs. but then will the higher quadrant score make ur phone go speed demon? no, i'm afraid not. point is, do quadrant brings any meanings? no, its not.
running fera v20 on locked bl, using the 3.6kernel
i only score 885...
anything i can do to fix this?
thanks
Benchmarks (especially quadrant) dont really mean anything. They aren't an accurate indicator of phone speed. They are pretty much just for bragging rights but real world means nothing.
But if you REALLY want... I recall there was a mod to boost quadrant really high by tricking the benchmark lol
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
I flashed some of chaotic weaponry stweaks profile and did this benchmark to see what I get. Is my phone fast ? Can it be faster? Just wondering
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
What was the score prior to flashing the tweaks, and does your phone feel faster after flashing the tweaks?
The note 2 can benchmark way higher than that. However I prefer smoothness and battery efficiency..
People actually care about benchmark scores?
shrike1978 said:
People actually care about benchmark scores?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol my thought exactly. These days, it's all about the software. Worrying about hardware speed is a thing of the past.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2