The depth in 3d is better on the LG optimis 3d. is the a way to change the evo 3d depth to there's or to a different setting
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Please for all of us. Just go get the LG.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
liljacques said:
The depth in 3d is better on the LG optimis 3d. is the a way to change the evo 3d depth to there's or to a different setting
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The same 3d content viewed on both phones is going to have the exact same depth and or popout. All the screen is doing on either phone is showing two pictures, one to each eye. The same 3d source is showing the same two pictures on either phone so the 3d effect has to be the same on both.
I think you may be thinking of the camera and not the screen. The evo's cameras are farther apart and would likely make the point where objects appear to pop off the screen farther away on pics taken with the evo. However, if you view pics taken with the optimus on the evo it will have the same depth as when viewed on the optimus.
And to answer your question, you can only adjust the 3d effect in games not in any pictures or video. The games use computer generated images so the effect can be adjusted. In order to adjust the effect in pics and video you would have to photoshop the images seen by each eye which is not something the phone can do on the fly.
ian928 said:
The same 3d content viewed on both phones is going to have the exact same depth and or popout. All the screen is doing on either phone is showing two pictures, one to each eye. The same 3d source is showing the same two pictures on either phone so the 3d effect has to be the same on both.
I think you may be thinking of the camera and not the screen. The evo's cameras are farther apart and would likely make the point where objects appear to pop off the screen farther away on pics taken with the evo. However, if you view pics taken with the optimus on the evo it will have the same depth as when viewed on the optimus.
And to answer your question, you can only adjust the 3d effect in games not in any pictures or video. The games use computer generated images so the effect can be adjusted. In order to adjust the effect in pics and video you would have to photoshop the images seen by each eye which is not something the phone can do on the fly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everything he said. Also, with some 3d software, you can adjust the depth of field.
ian928 said:
The same 3d content viewed on both phones is going to have the exact same depth and or popout. All the screen is doing on either phone is showing two pictures, one to each eye. The same 3d source is showing the same two pictures on either phone so the 3d effect has to be the same on both.
I think you may be thinking of the camera and not the screen. The evo's cameras are farther apart and would likely make the point where objects appear to pop off the screen farther away on pics taken with the evo. However, if you view pics taken with the optimus on the evo it will have the same depth as when viewed on the optimus.
And to answer your question, you can only adjust the 3d effect in games not in any pictures or video. The games use computer generated images so the effect can be adjusted. In order to adjust the effect in pics and video you would have to photoshop the images seen by each eye which is not something the phone can do on the fly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? Or are you a fanboy of htc?
Because on youtube and on some topics here, people do say the optiumus 3d has more depth with the 3d effect.
Basicly you just said that the 3ds, evo3d and o3d all have desame depths, pop out effects...?
Maybe you can explain a bit more why people are saying the o3d has a better effect?
So if you watch a 3d movie, both the o3d, 3vo and 3ds will have desame effect, depths, pop outs ect?
You made me all confused
borgqueenx said:
Really? Or are you a fanboy of htc?
Because on youtube and on some topics here, people do say the optiumus 3d has more depth with the 3d effect.
Basicly you just said that the 3ds, evo3d and o3d all have desame depths, pop out effects...?
Maybe you can explain a bit more why people are saying the o3d has a better effect?
So if you watch a 3d movie, both the o3d, 3vo and 3ds will have desame effect, depths, pop outs ect?
You made me all confused
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, the depth will be the same if you watch the same files on any of these devices. The screen can't change the media, only the media itself can change.
Do some reattach on how 3d stuff works and you will see what I mean.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
borgqueenx said:
Really? Or are you a fanboy of htc?
Because on youtube and on some topics here, people do say the optiumus 3d has more depth with the 3d effect.
Basicly you just said that the 3ds, evo3d and o3d all have desame depths, pop out effects...?
Maybe you can explain a bit more why people are saying the o3d has a better effect?
So if you watch a 3d movie, both the o3d, 3vo and 3ds will have desame effect, depths, pop outs ect?
You made me all confused
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes absolutely the evo 3d, optimus 3d, and the 3ds will have the exact same 3d effect when viewing the same source file, such as avatar 3d or any other prerecorded media.
What people are referring to when they say the optimus has more depth or the evo has more popout is the pictures and video created by the phone. Since the evo's cameras are father apart the two phones will create a different 3d effect even when taking a picture in the exact same location with both phones. This difference is due to the 3d cameras and has absolutely nothing to do with the screen.
The 3d effect simply cannot have any difference in depth when viewing the same prerecorded media. Do a little more research into how 3d works and you will understand this better.
people. i just asked desame at the optimus 3d section and this is what ive got:
You are referring to the differences in the cameras, not the screens. Optimus photos viewed on the evo will have the same depth as when they are viewed on the optimus. All these phones are doing is showing two 2d pictures on the same screen at the same time while blocking the opposite eye from seeing the other pic. The same 3d source will have the same 3d effect on both phones. The same source has the same two pics when viewed on either screen and therefore cannot have a different 3d effect.
Now if we are talking about different sources then of course the 3d effect can be different.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only true if one assumes that both handsets are using a parallax barrier of the same quality which works equally effective. This doesn't seem to be the case. (3d images on the O3D are supposed to be more crisp and the viewing angle is supposed to be wider as well)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
seems the optimus 3d uses another parallax barrier, so it makes the screen much better in handling 3d.
The viewing angles may well be better on the optimus but when you're in the sweet spot on the evo there is absolutely no bleed over from the other image. This can be seen be winking each eye independently. Therefore the parallax barrier isn't effecting the amount of depth in the 3d when viewed properly.
The amount of depth is determined by the source not the screen. I suspect when people say the optimus has better 3d they're either not viewing the same source on both or they're referring to viewing angles which has nothing to do with the amount of depth in the 3d effect.
borgqueenx said:
people. i just asked desame at the optimus 3d section and this is what ive got:
seems the optimus 3d uses another parallax barrier, so it makes the screen much better in handling 3d.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How can a less crisp screen be more crisp? Hhmm
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
Well thanks guys but at least with the 3ds it is possible to set the depth/power of the 3d effect. Maybe the optimus is set higher then the evo3d?
And will there be a fix so the evo3d takes better 3d photos?
It seems everyone agrees the optimus3d is better in that...
Most 3d games you can adjust it. When viewing a picture tap the picture select effects and adjust the 3d alignment to your hearts content. Make it appear far away or make it popout.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
3d games are very different than pictures and video. They are computer generated and therefore the 3d effect can be easily adjusted on the fly. I have two 3d games on my evo and both can be adjusted over quite a large range from off to a lot of depth.
Pictures and video are a different animal. On the evo you can adjust the overlay of the pictures, which is just sliding one pic to the left and the other to the right. Now this does change the amount of depth but on most pictures there is only one point where the image looks correct without the other image bleeding over. This feature is there to compensate for the evo's, cameras being unable to swivel like your eyes. The cameras can't go crosseyed like your eyes can when viewing something close to your face. Some images will get the other image bleeding over and this feature allows you to compensate til there is none.
The problem is everyone here seems to think some super quality screen on one beats the other. Lol.
Ignorant.
People don't even see 3d the same. Certain types of 3d may effect someone more or less than another.
The LG simply assist with focussing on the 3d content.
Thus the content appears smoother more in depth. When really as you adjust. The LG cleary does too.
That would help eliminate the card board effect somewhat.
I'm not a doctor. Technologist is more fitting.
Sometimes an analytical view can assist in providing a better understanding of a competitors technical advantage.
This technology will be used by all manufacturers soon.
Then Apple will pull a patent out their ass or some bull**** rebrand it and call it the new hotness your grandma wish she lived long enough to have.
Apple will get its way and we will all get the iPhone.
Of course by 5 years time Apple would of purchased Android.
Rebranded it.
Send it out in pieces.
Call it the new hotness you wish you would of lived long enough to have.
Sorry some dork shiet. But you get it. I think.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
Related
Was at the sprint store yesterday and they let me play with EVO 3D.
First impressions:
Feels solid, just like the EVO 4G.
Shutter button is awesome and auto focus is very fast.
Pictures and videos taken in 3D did not look 3D and kept changing under different angles.
The Green Hornet in 3D was amazing, it actually looked 3D.
I don't understand why pictures taken with the phone don't look like the preloaded movie, which makes me think that the screen itself is capable of playing 3D content its just that the camera is not a true 3D camera.
Finally i wanted to compare 2D pictures to my EVO and so i emailed one to myself and here it is.
How did the screen look? Some reviews say it looks like poo because of it being 3D. I think that shouldn't be the case.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
So how does the pic you took with 3D compare to Ur 4G?
[/B]
goldt said:
Was at the sprint store yesterday and they let me play with EVO 3D.
First impressions:
Feels solid, just like the EVO 4G.
Shutter button is awesome and auto focus is very fast.
Pictures and videos taken in 3D did not look 3D and kept changing under different angles.
The Green Hornet in 3D was amazing, it actually looked 3D.
I don't understand why pictures taken with the phone don't look like the preloaded movie, which makes me think that the screen itself is capable of playing 3D content its just that the camera is not a true 3D camera.
Finally i wanted to compare 2D pictures to my EVO and so i emailed one to myself and here it is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
goldt said:
Was at the sprint store yesterday and they let me play with EVO 3D.
First impressions:
Feels solid, just like the EVO 4G.
Shutter button is awesome and auto focus is very fast.
Pictures and videos taken in 3D did not look 3D and kept changing under different angles.
The Green Hornet in 3D was amazing, it actually looked 3D.
I don't understand why pictures taken with the phone don't look like the preloaded movie, which makes me think that the screen itself is capable of playing 3D content its just that the camera is not a true 3D camera.
Finally i wanted to compare 2D pictures to my EVO and so i emailed one to myself and here it is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for this thread! Finally, not a thread from some POS attention whore. The pic looks great and I just may push my wife into getting a 3D as well. She was planning to get the OG EVO upgrading from a BB Curve
goldt said:
I don't understand why pictures taken with the phone don't look like the preloaded movie, which makes me think that the screen itself is capable of playing 3D content its just that the camera is not a true 3D camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because the movie was captured with professional 3D equipment. The Evo 3D is true 3D, all you need are 2 cameras, just like you have 2 eyeballs on your head. The problem with having 2 fixed cameras though, is that they cannot pivot (like your eyeballs) in order to compensate for the distance between the cameras and the subject, so the 3D/depth perception will not always be that good, especially for closeups.
fpineda101 said:
Thanks for this thread! Finally, not a thread from some POS attention whore. The pic looks great and I just may push my wife into getting a 3D as well. She was planning to get the OG EVO upgrading from a BB Curve
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, the pic does look quite nice ... even though I see plenty evidence of compression losses, that's not the camera's fault and can be easily fixed in the settings.
Thanks OP. I was having a hard time believing that HTC couldn't get a 5MP camera to take a decent pic.
Will be interesting to see how Vignette performs on the phone. By far, the superior camera app, because it limits compression.
The two cameras are too close together for the 3D effect to be as visible as what the movies are. Ideally they would be as far apart as both your eyes are but that's not very practical on a cell phone. The picture there looks pretty good to me though, not as good as what my DSLR can do but the lenses alone for that thing are more than that phone costs.
i'm not worried as much about the megapixel part of the camera or even the 3d portion... i just want it to be clear and the color right.
my evo 4g takes clear pictures but the colors are way off.
here's a picture of my bike taken with my EVO:
and here's what it really looks like...taken with a older Nikon point and shoot:
ps: thanks for snagging a picture with the phone though. the color looks better than my evo.... it does look grainy though.
Second picture is just about as good as the Samsung Epic 4G camera.
First picture is random (was going to look up what type of plant it was) and second picture is my friend's dock.
These look very similar to the quality of EVO 3D's camera.
samsung phone camera's do kick ass.. as a matter of fact the second pic of mine could have been taken with my old moment. too bad the rest of the samsung phone isn't as good as the camera.
this is a pic with my old Moment:
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/3kACqfLKhhFAPSAGYG6PNPBysbpwLdvsPkUAoJFAq4I?feat=directlink
DualSportDad said:
samsung phone camera's do kick ass.. as a matter of fact the second pic of mine could have been taken with my old moment. too bad the rest of the samsung phone isn't as good as the camera.
this is a pic with my old Moment:
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/3kACqfLKhhFAPSAGYG6PNPBysbpwLdvsPkUAoJFAq4I?feat=directlink
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, I have some amazing shots with my Vibrant
Yeah my moms epic camera is way better than my EVO.
I noticed your in a Sprint store. Anyone know when they will be up for display? I assume not until the 24th? I think I want to see the phone in person before I decide.
I honestly do think that HTC is not as good as samsung probably when it comes to writing software. I honestly do believe that software customizations that samsung makes are probably much better than HTC.
Touchwiz is much more buggy than sense imo. Samsung just uses better sensors for their cameras
Sent from my GT-P7510 using XDA Premium App
goldt said:
the camera is not a true 3D camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agh i wish htc just paid samsung for their camera sensors, it would make the 3D perfect. (well close enough). Or they could take out all the 3D, and just made the battery huge
fowenati said:
agh i wish htc just paid samsung for their camera sensors, it would make the 3D perfect. (well close enough). Or they could take out all the 3D, and just made the battery huge
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Their sensors are good, it's their optics and post processing that hurt the pictures.
xHausx said:
Their sensors are good, it's their optics and post processing that hurt the pictures.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
then htc needs to stop putting 10 layers on their damned lenses and keep one good GLASS layer that’s not protrududing from the damned phone so it gets frekin scratched.
/endrant
The evo 4g has the same sensor as the iphone4 IIRC....the lense and software not so much
Sent from my PC36100
Since there is not yet an Evo 3D Q&A forum, I'm asking this here. I hope no one gets offended.
I know very little about 3D technology, but from what I gather, our Evo 3D will actually take two separate photos when in 3D mode and by virtue of the parallax effect, allow us to view them as a single 3D image on the phone. I get that and have no problem wrapping my head around the concept. I confused, however, about the 3D's video capture. I viewed some Evo 3D video content on Youtube and it appears to look like conventional red/blue 3D video, that is, it just appears blurry or out of focus to the naked eye. If I had a pair of those glasses they hand out at 3D movies, would the YT content look like a conventional 3D movie? I found a pair on Amazon for less than $4 shipped and if that's all it takes to view other folk's 3D content, I'll order a pair today.
Does anyone have thoughts or suggestions?
erikivy said:
Since there is not yet an Evo 3D Q&A forum, I'm asking this here. I hope no one gets offended.
I know very little about 3D technology, but from what I gather, our Evo 3D will actually take two separate photos when in 3D mode and by virtue of the parallax effect, allow us to view them as a single 3D image on the phone. I get that and have no problem wrapping my head around the concept. I confused, however, about the 3D's video capture. I viewed some Evo 3D video content on Youtube and it appears to look like conventional red/blue 3D video, that is, it just appears blurry or out of focus to the naked eye. If I had a pair of those glasses they hand out at 3D movies, would the YT content look like a conventional 3D movie? I found a pair on Amazon for less than $4 shipped and if that's all it takes to view other folk's 3D content, I'll order a pair today.
Does anyone have thoughts or suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Saw it first hand. No glasses required.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
The videos actually upload to youtube as a side by side video, like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gi10cVU9B7U&feature=related.
If one has a 3d capable device, then the video is played back as 3d. however, if not, then the video is played back like it is above (assuming youre watching it on your 4g or laptop).
However, i have heard of people being able to use video editing software to put it into a stereoscopic red-blue type video and make it possible to use it with the 3d glasses.
Leoisright said:
Saw it first hand. No glasses required.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't mean on the device, I mean on YT.
codyisnottanner said:
The videos actually upload to youtube as a side by side video, like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gi10cVU9B7U&feature=related.
If one has a 3d capable device, then the video is played back as 3d. however, if not, then the video is played back like it is above (assuming youre watching it on your 4g or laptop).
However, i have heard of people being able to use video editing software to put it into a stereoscopic red-blue type video and make it possible to use it with the 3d glasses.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, I get it now. The clip I saw must not have been generated by the Evo 3D because it was the red-blue type. That was the primary source of my confusion.
And you couldn't put it in the device NAMED on behalf of its CAMERA?
****.http://www.betanews.com/article/HTC-puts-an-end-to-crappy-Android-cameras-with-the-TMobile-myTouch-4G-Slide/1309275865
This may be why we didn't get the sensations camera software, there is hope in the air
Bussin Caps from my 3D shooter
Wow,craptastic....I could of sworn the back of my phone says HD IMAGING....guess I should have gotten a my touch.
Sent from that EVO3D Thingy...I need an asprin.
So can they give us this software as an update for our EVO?
I wonder what HTC thinks sometimes when they make their devices....
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
ktrotter11 said:
This may be why we didn't get the sensations camera software, there is hope in the air
Bussin Caps from my 3D shooter
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
running off the same (if not minorly different) dualcore 1.2 snapdragon should mean it wouldn't be too difficult for devs to port over IMO. As the article says "the major improvements come in the [camera] software." Once we have root, all your hopes should become reality.
Well if it could be ported and it'd work ok that'd be fantabulous! Read somewhere that there's always been major issues when modding camera software tho. (I'm no dev!).
itsallsubliminal said:
running off the same (if not minorly different) dualcore 1.2 snapdragon should mean it wouldn't be too difficult for devs to port over IMO. As the article says "the major improvements come in the [camera] software." Once we have root, all your hopes should become reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the software really gonna help though, I always though it was the lense or sensor that was the problem with the photo quality. Hardware things. I'm not really liking the camera on the 3d, anything less than a perfectly clear sunny day looks like crap.
The issue is HTC would have to make a version for 3D devices. That software only has the 2D function. It would have to be modified to work with 3D. That or just loose your ability to take 3D photos. I wouldn't want that.
The software would help in the added features but not so much with picture quality. The ONLY software feature I see that would improve the image quality would be the HDR feature (high dynamic range - not high definition as we know HD).
For those who aren't familiar with HDR, you snap multiple photos in various exposure (usually 3). Then software combines them to produce a more evenly/naturally exposed image - shadows aren't pitch black, highlights aren't washed out white, etc.
The f/2.2 aperture and illuminated sensor are hardware features that really beef up the camera. You pay a pretty penny for a f/2 range lens in photography and the lower that number, the more like you can get into the lens (there's more to it too).
The illuminated sensor... I'll be honest that I don't know the technicalities of how this works but use a prosumer video camera with this feature and switching on the illumination does wonders for low-light image quality.
I've taken a LOT of pictures with my EVO 4G and they've all been eye catching to say the least. I'm too embarrassed to show off any pics I've taken with the EVO 3D; they look horrible!! Is there ANYTHING I can do that gets rid of the green tinge all my EVO 3D pics kick out?
ScandaLeX said:
I've taken a LOT of pictures with my EVO 4G and they've all been eye catching to say the least. I'm too embarrassed to show off any pics I've taken with the EVO 3D; they look horrible!! Is there ANYTHING I can do that gets rid of the green tinge all my EVO 3D pics kick out?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are all your evo 3d pics really "horrible" ?
If you want something that'll really show off the 3D on your 3vo, you have to get this movie.
clankfu said:
If you want something that'll really show off the 3D on your 3vo, you have to get this movie.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The IMAX Hubble 3D is really good too. the depth is almost too much. but great none the less.
Holy cow, yes! I use this one to: at around 21 minutes, the close-up of that fish popping out of the screen is amazing (they follow all the "rules" of 3D, so it looks fantastic).
Where can i get it?
.mkv works on evo?
pollo55 said:
.mkv works on evo?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use the free app Handbrake to convert it to mp4. Search the forum, there are step by step instructions posted.
Does any one knows where can I get 3d movies
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Forget the movie, what are these "rules" for 3D?
Kilmar said:
Forget the movie, what are these "rules" for 3D?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://androidforums.com/htc-evo-3d/345384-3d-pop-out-clarified-violations-lead-discomfort.html
novox77 said:
I spoke with my neighborhood stereoscopy expert (30-years of experience, custom-built camera rig, home-theater setup with polarized projectors, etc.) and learned quite a bit about 3D imagery. Thought I'd share some general facts and other factors that cause eye strain and headaches.
Regarding images that pop out: already proven possible with the screen technology. But will the phone's camera be able to capture a subject and then show it popping out? Most likely, but not guaranteed.
In another thread, I incorrectly concluded that the focal point determines the threshold where things pop out or appear behind the screen. Actually that threshold is fixed based on the distance between the lens and the offset of the sensors behind the lenses. I have no visibility into how the E3D's sensors are set, so there's no way to guess what the zero parallax line lies. However, once the phone is released, it will be trivial to determine this by taking a picture of a ruler (or tape measure) that extends from the camera. If you overlay the stereo images in photoshop, the ruler will appear as a thin X. Where the convergence of the X is on the ruler will be the zero parallax line (aka point of convergence).
Objects farther from zero parallax will appear behind the display; objects closer will appear to pop out from the screen.
This article makes it really simple to understand:
STEREOSCOPIC (3D) FILMMAKING OVERVIEW Part 2
Commonly, the distance between cameras (aka the stereo base) is set to the human interocular distance (distance between human eyes), which is about 2.5". But there's no real reason why this needs to be enforced; it really depends on the scale of your subject. If you're taking a picture of insects, your camera lenses should be much closer together. If you're taking a picture of the grand canyon, the cameras should be very far apart. Again, that article above talks about why you may want to use cameras that are further apart. But a moot point for E3D since we can't adjust the cameras. But given that the Evo's cameras are kinda close together, the best 3D shots will be with subjects closer to the screen.
Onto the discomfort.
My source tells me that pop-out is actually not very desirable for two reasons:
1) it causes eye strain due to the need to focus on a point close to the eyes (cross-eye). Prolonged cross-eye is not comfortable.
2) when a pop-out object is cropped by the edge of the screen, our brain freaks out because it conflicts with reality. The object should appear in front of the edge and not be cut off. This is considered a violation of good stereoscopy and should be avoided.
Another violation is an exaggeration of depth where the distance between stereo images exceeds the interocular distance. This isn't going to be a problem with the Evo 3D's images, but this is much more common in a theater. Film producers sometimes push the limit to try to give the scene maximum depth by spacing out the parallax images. This can trigger instant headaches. Also if you sit too close to the screen, the problem becomes amplified.
He rattled off a few more violations that I can't recall, but basically he says that the violations are what make 3D gimmicky, and it's also responsible for the discomfort and inability to see in 3D for some subset of the public. When the rules of stereoscopy are obeyed, the results are spectacular and comfortable to view, because they simulate depth realistically.
Just sharing for those of you actually interested in the 3D capabilities of the phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the link and info on 3D. That was a pretty good read. I definitely feel the discomfort of items that pop out and are cut off by the boarder of the screen. Very surreal.
dca1970 said:
Where can i get it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can get it from here but you'll have to convert it using Handbrake which is free.
Here's a tutorial:
I followed the tutorial with another 3D movie I had and it ended up looking great but the audio is choppy. Would MP3 perform better or should I try kicking the samplerate down to 44.1 or lower?
gthing said:
I followed the tutorial with another 3D movie I had and it ended up looking great but the audio is choppy. Would MP3 perform better or should I try kicking the samplerate down to 44.1 or lower?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure since I don't know crap about encoding videos but I followed that tutorial and all the movies I encoded turned out fine. Maybe it was a problem with that particular rip of your movie?
I followed the directions for converting the file and it's not in 3D. It plays but it's side by side videos.
plmiller0905 said:
I followed the directions for converting the file and it's not in 3D. It plays but it's side by side videos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to hit the menu button and switch to 3D mode.
clankfu said:
Not sure since I don't know crap about encoding videos but I followed that tutorial and all the movies I encoded turned out fine. Maybe it was a problem with that particular rip of your movie?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm ... thanks for your feedback. I tried watching the movie on my desktop and found it was messed up there as well, so it's not an issue with the phone player. I tested both aac encoders, the lame mp3 encoder, and even ac3 (each at various bitrates) with the same result. The original video (mkv) plays fine...
Edit: I tried another video and the settings worked fine. Not sure what the deal is with this particular video (Hubble 3D).
clankfu said:
You have to hit the menu button and switch to 3D mode.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks that worked
Wait so besides you can "look into" like a box, images can also "jump out"?
Nice!!! Or not, if i read that article lol.
daveeckert said:
Holy cow, yes! I use this one to: at around 21 minutes, the close-up of that fish popping out of the screen is amazing (they follow all the "rules" of 3D, so it looks fantastic).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow - you're right. That part looks amazing! I'm going to try to rip just that clip tonight and put it up on Youtube so everyone else can see it.
As a side note, I've found that the angle to view 3d on my phone is not straight on. I have to hold it at a bit of an angle with the right side of the phone further away from my face than the left. Is that what everyone else is finding or are you guys viewing things pretty much dead on?
el_chamuco said:
Does any one knows where can I get 3d movies
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SBS or Side-By-Side is the key search term to find 3D movies. Just go to one of the usual places and search it.
Hi guys!
Please Have a look attached file and advice me.
Is my evo 3d faulty? or common?
Need your help and opinion.
Thanks!
bboori said:
Hi guys!
Please Have a look attached file and advice me.
Is my evo 3d faulty? or common?
Need your help and opinion.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never heard of this before .. according to your screenshot and your "good" and "bad" pictures, there appears to be an issue. where did you obtain the "good" picture from? do you have two evo 3d devices you're comparing side by side?
Suppose if you wanted to add measurements on the physical gap between the two cameras along with the screenshots, then others could also measure the gap between their cameras and post their results.
Measuring the gap seems to be a pretty quantitative method of analyzing the issue.
Keep us updated!
joeykrim said:
Never heard of this before .. according to your screenshot and your "good" and "bad" pictures, there appears to be an issue. where did you obtain the "good" picture from? do you have two evo 3d devices you're comparing side by side?
Suppose if you wanted to add measurements on the physical gap between the two cameras along with the screenshots, then others could also measure the gap between their cameras and post their results.
Measuring the gap seems to be a pretty quantitative method of analyzing the issue.
Keep us updated!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3d photos from other web site for your understand.
coz I'm not good at speaking english. ^^; so I made it
But I can say My 3d photos are always like wrong 3d style. it makes headach. T.T
And please googleing about 3d photography than you will know which is good 3d photo. ^^
Thanks.
That picture of your camera is not square. You need to center the camera over the red square
Sent from my EVO 3D on XDA premium app
did you drop the phone at all. that looks like a probelm.
No I didn't..
Ignore a camera picture.
How is your photo look like?
you guys got 3d photo like a good 3d sample?
tell me and post your photo please.
I'd like to compare it.
Thanks.
Comparison
Ok, I think the position of both cameras are unimportant because. I think most of the corrections and overlaping of the images taken from the cameras and creating the 3d effect are software made (thats my opinion and my guess as an Electronic Engenieer). But I can't be sure because i wasn't in the design of the phone :S, jajaja... and I haven't even study about this process...
But I'll tell you what would I do for determining the problem.
The problem could be the display too... So i'd try taking a 3d pic and then look at it in other 3d device (maybe another evo 3d).
If the image is still the same, I'd try update firmware or Rom... or something in the phone software...
Think about the cameras, they are like eyes... and think about people, some have a larger space between the eyes than others and no one is perfect like your phone. It's the brain that fixes itself to watch the world in the better way.
If you have headache watching 3d pics, also you could be the problem jejeje... because you are not used to the watch it (like my father). Ask someone else if they have the same problem when watching 3d pics in your phone.
No no, that's not what I'm trying to say. ummm..
For example..If you want to take a 3d photo by 2 normal cameras. you must take a photo same level(horizontaly) of balance. because humen eyes like it.
if not same level of camera makes wrong 3D style of my smaple photo. Yes!! you can see this wrong 3d with 3d effect but it is not proepr method of take 3d photo. also gogleling LG3d camera photo sample. it is alligned verticaly.
I'm not good at speaking Eng. But I hope you guys understand what i'm talking to.
Thanks.
Maybe I don't understand what it takes to take a 3d pic.
Just think it's more like a software issue.
Also, the distance of the camera you are complaining about would result in a much more ugly photo because a little radious is higher at the distance.
When you are going to take a photo before you push the trigger, do you still see the it in a bad shape?
I also speak in Spanish, I'm from Mexico.
Feel free if it's easier in spanish but not in the forum, jejeje...
Please have a look this article.
Rotational and Vertical Disparities in Source Footage
Disparities corrected so all straight lines are parallel
Unwelcome Disparities (Geometric, lens and temporal)
Disparity is a “dirty word” for stereographers. In fact the only “good” type of disparity in S3D is horizontal disparity between the left and right eye images. As mentioned before, this is known as parallax.
Any other type of disparity in your image (vertical, rotational, zoom, keystone or temporal) will cause the viewers eyes to strain to accommodate. This can break the 3D effect and cause muscular pain in the viewer’s eyes or even nausea. Every stereographer will strive to avoid these disparities on set by carefully calibrating the steroescopic rig and it will be tweaked ever further in post production through the use of 3D mastering software.
From : http://www.dashwood3d.com/blog/beginners-guide-to-shooting-stereoscopic-3d/
So I think our camera has got Vertical Disparities problem. or my camera only?
If it is software problem. how can I adjust it? and finally don't you have this Vertical Disparities problem?
PS. You will not be able to 'see' this problem on your mobile screen, not until you put it on YouTube and can see what's going on when viewing anaglyph with no glasses on your pc. than You will notice it.
Thanks.
can you send me a pic taken from your phone?
I don't see any problems with mine.
fcomeba said:
can you send me a pic taken from your phone?
I don't see any problems with mine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is mine http://db.tt/N1d0DdEA