I have a Korean SGSII, and I looked up the system information by Quadrant and it says 'cores: 1'.
ARM V7I
Isn't it supposed to show 2?
Sent from my SHW-M250K using xda premium
You mean quadrant standard information? Yeah, mine is two..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Huh...it says ARM V7 Processor rev 1(V7I)...with only one core.
Sent from my SHW-M250K using xda premium
minho422 said:
Huh...it says ARM V7 Processor rev 1(V7I)...with only one core.
Sent from my SHW-M250K using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One here as well, it doesn't really matter though as it still uses both. Probably just setcpu detecting the information incorrectly.
Try using quadrant standard.. I only get 1 core in quadrant advanced and 2 cores in quadrant standard..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
At the.time you check it only uses 1cpu.
Your governor is probably set to: ondemand.
So if you do a lot of things fast, and it neeeds another cpu to keep up with you, that's when the second cpu kicks in.
When you can simulate that and open app fast, you will see it detects two cpu's. I had same issue intil I started switching between tabs really fast and checked back; two instead of one.
Try it.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
ephraim033 said:
.. and 2 cores in quadrant standard..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Standard got ads. Advanced doesn't.
This is also why you see 1 in advanced, and 2 in standard. For the standard version it needs more cpu-power to do everything the app asks for; permissions, ads etc. advanced doesnt have this so thats why you see one. (less actions, less cpu-power needed.)
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Quadrant doesn't truly support 2 cores, therefore it sometimes shows 1, other times 2.
bruflot said:
Quadrant doesn't truly support 2 cores, therefore it sometimes shows 1, other times 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't mean to be rude. But I was trying to point that out with my story!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
BryanNL said:
Standard got ads. Advanced doesn't.
This is also why you see 1 in advanced, and 2 in standard. For the standard version it needs more cpu-power to do everything the app asks for; permissions, ads etc. advanced doesnt have this so thats why you see one. (less actions, less cpu-power needed.)
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I disabled the add in quadrant standard so i think it's not the culprit..
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Related
Hi all,i just want to share with you this application that improve your phones performance on stock kernel without overclocking.
It's (Sysctl config *root*) you can find in market.(root needed)
All that you need to do is to download this app and set the settings that fit best for our phone(check my screenshots).
Before:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
After:
Before:
After:
Settings:
Where is the app? or what is it´s name?
Apology11 said:
Where is the app? or what is it´s name?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sysctl in market.
Sent from my LT26i using Tapatalk 2
After overclocking to 1.728 ghz my score was 7200 on Antutu. So this tweak should score around 7400-7500
Interesting
Great thread, I'm using the same settings quoted above and while I am seeing an improvement, I'm getting less impressive results. My results are as follows...
Score 6827
Cpu - 3174
Ram - 1364
Gpu - 1551
I/O - 738
Has anyone else got other suggestions to beat this?
Any config for Xperia p
Send from Xperia P
Ohh well,The apps crashes on my phone.
Sent from my LT26i using xda app-developers app
Works fine with your settings on CM9.1 fxp141
big improvement in quadrant (stock speed 1512mhz) from 3380-3598
thanks man!
Any suggestions for xperia u ics?
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda app-developers app
You can use system tuner app too
Sent from my LT26i using Tapatalk 2
Seems to work, thanks for this tip! :victory:
But what is it actually doing to the way the phone runs?
Sent from my LT26i using Tapatalk 2
Gonna try this right now.
Thanks for sharing:thumbup:
Sent from my LT26i using xda premium
darth5zaft said:
Ohh well,The apps crashes on my phone.
Sent from my LT26i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
make sure you install busybox by Stephen stericsson.
Ben36 said:
But what is it actually doing to the way the phone runs?
Sent from my LT26i using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
And is this safe to run, no overclocking or heating?
CiscoX said:
+1
And is this safe to run, no overclocking or heating?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It just changes some values in the System's config, which leads to better performance(mostly in benchmarks though) if set up properly. You can always get back to your stock values by just unchecking Apply on boot(if you checked it tho) and reboot.
realfelix said:
It just changes some values in the System's config, which leads to better performance(mostly in benchmarks though) if set up properly. You can always get back to your stock values by just unchecking Apply on boot(if you checked it tho) and reboot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much realfelix
CiscoX said:
Thank you very much realfelix
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're welcome mate
just ran antutu. got a score of 7473... i also used your settings from the screenshot you posted. just copied it. am very with the result but
is your settings ideal for every day use?
lunacy8 said:
just ran antutu. got a score of 7473... i also used your settings from the screenshot you posted. just copied it. am very with the result but
is your settings ideal for every day use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been using these settings for 2/3 days now and didn't encounter any problem so I'd say yes
I've been using quadrant, but I've heard others claim this is worthless. What are you using and why?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
Antutu benchmark
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Wildfire S A510e using xda premium
Real world experience....It's the best of them all...never lies
studacris said:
Real world experience....It's the best of them all...never lies
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. Benchmarks are virtually worthless compared to actual user experiences.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
welchertc said:
+1. Benchmarks are virtually worthless compared to actual user experiences.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm. I don't go buy a pc without researching the benchmarks. I might be using an amd chip had I not looked at the benchmarks of the Intel chips in comparison. I don't suspect our phones and the chips we have in them are any different. There has to be certain tests that prove a chip's performance. There's always a game or function that can push a chip to it's limits, and some of us want to know what those limits are.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
Guitarfreak12 said:
Antutu benchmark
Sent from my Wildfire S A510e using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was about to say that score is pretty bad... but then I noticed you aren't on a GNote.
Benchmarking serves a purpose, surely. But real world experience trumps sheer numbers (within reason). For instance, S4 versus Tegra 3. Both excel at certain benchmarks, but in reality, both are great.
Where benchmarking is f'in retarded is when someone *****es that they scored a 6200 and joe schmoe scored a 6250...and they are pissed.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
the apps are easily fooled, i can build you a Rom that will show "over 9000!!!!" On benches, but run like total and complete garbage.
studacris said:
the apps are easily fooled, i can build you a Rom that will show "over 9000!!!!" On benches, but run like total and complete garbage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh, but that's why we need a benchmark program that's not fooled by the rom. Pc's have them. Aren't our phones merely small pc's?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
I know....a benchmark program built into the recovery mode software, so you could test the chip outside of the rom. That is a good idea. That way the test won't be skewed by widgets and background processes. Although I do like to know how much improvement comes from my overclocking.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
hey guys i am getting just 8600 benchmark scoring.. am on foxhound rom.. any suggestions how to improve the score.. the highest is around 16000 :/
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Same here u.j
Enviado desde mi GT-I9300 usando Tapatalk 2
drdanishkhannew.540 said:
hey guys i am getting just 8600 benchmark scoring.. am on foxhound rom.. any suggestions how to improve the score.. the highest is around 16000 :/
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What application did you used in performing such test? You can overclock the gpu and cpu for better results. And also..turn off the power saving mode before benchmarking because it affects the result.
Benchmarks have nothing to do with real-world usage, in fact many optimizations for real-world usage will cause Quadrant to massively drop.
It there anything performance-wise you are unhappy with and if so: whah.
I'd strongly recommend retaining from overclocking unless you know exactly why you need it and what you are doing (something 99% of people don't seem to get)
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
No i dont need any overclocking.. i used Antutu.. getting just 50% marks in a test.. that was bothering me.. otherwise performance wise theres absolutely no problem..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
are you sure power-saving is off?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
drdanishkhannew.540 said:
No i dont need any overclocking.. i used Antutu.. getting just 50% marks in a test.. that was bothering me.. otherwise performance wise theres absolutely no problem..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does the phone work?
do those results change the way you use the phone?
Does getting a lower score mean you cant do what you want to do?
Naah the phones perfect.. but i am rooyed so why not try gettin good benchmarks also.. no problem otherwise.. thanks everyone..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Here's mine on Android Revolution HD (ICS ROM)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
You should do the benchmark test when your phone is cool.
I've noticed that I get about 12K when it's cool, and about 8K-9K when it's after some use.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I was just wondering how come in the system panel app it says the phone only has 3 processors? What does it mean?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
:facepalm: do you not see the processor cores???
prinzhernan said:
I was just wondering how come in the system panel app it says the phone only has 3 processors? What does it mean?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't even have 3 processors, it only has 1!!!
Luckily that one processor has 4 cores!
"It's all in the game yo, all in the game..." - Omar Little
b-eock said:
:facepalm: do you not see the processor cores???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do see it. But the 3rd line says 3. What's the difference from the first and third line?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
prinzhernan said:
I do see it. But the 3rd line says 3. What's the difference from the first and third line?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Number 3 is the 4th core. Cores go by 0,1,2 and 3. The details in the app are for the 4th core.
circuit89 said:
Number 3 is the 4th core. Cores go by 0,1,2 and 3. The details in the app are for the 4th core.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh I see! Now I get it. Thanks!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Another thing, but shouldn't be ARM A9 not A7??
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Asseel said:
Another thing, but shouldn't be ARM A9 not A7??
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's an ARMv7 -- which just happens to be an A9.
I know, it's confusing.
Asseel said:
Another thing, but shouldn't be ARM A9 not A7??
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ARM7 is the instruction set, Cortex A9 is the architecture
nodstuff said:
It doesn't even have 3 processors, it only has 1!!!
Luckily that one processor has 4 cores!
"It's all in the game yo, all in the game..." - Omar Little
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeahhh, people always got this confusion... luckily u there giving the xplaination. Our GS3 have 1 processor but have 4 cores. Hehehe.. don't get confuse, okeyh?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Is just me or what?
After I enable GPU rendering, feels everything become little laggy than it is disabled?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
qtwrk said:
Is just me or what?
After I enable GPU rendering, feels everything become little laggy than it is disabled?
View attachment 1720357
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GPU rendering isn't effective for MOST apps. Also take into account, that the MALI 400MP is a very weak GPU. Also, don't mess about in developer option's if you don't know what they do eh?
No you have it disabled. And for the the other dude saying that the MALI 400 is a weak GPU. You are retarded. It has one point (triangles) where it fails compared to newer GPUs. But it is still one of the top GPUs around.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
b-eock said:
No you have it disabled. And for the the other dude saying that the MALI 400 is a weak GPU. You are retarded. It has one point (triangles) where it fails compared to newer GPUs. But it is still one of the top GPUs around.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's WEAK for 2013 i never meant it that way, last year it was a good GPU, 2011 was when the s2 was announced and it carried a mali 400mp. That was clocked at about 200mhz or so, all Samsung did was just overclock it to 440mhz. THAT is the ONLY reason that it kept up with some other GPU's on the market.
paintball23456 said:
it's WEAK for 2013 i never meant it that way, last year it was a good GPU, 2011 was when the s2 was announced and it carried a mali 400mp. That was clocked at about 200mhz or so, all Samsung did was just overclock it to 440mhz. THAT is the ONLY reason that it kept up with some other GPU's on the market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It still isn't weak.
I guess Nvdia's (Tegra chipset) GPU is better as they have been working on PC GPU for many years?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
qtwrk said:
I guess Nvdia's (Tegra chipset) GPU is better as they have been working on PC GPU for many years?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should ask Linus Torvalds.
He gave a personal middle finger and a "F*ck you, Nvidia"