The title says so, wad i must be good at? I know that i must have ubuntu for compiling and creating... And what else?
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk
Dax, have you consulted with fserve or franco, those two are the leading one's on kernel development, if you get a link to what you wanna know, pass it this way, don't have a computer just yet but having the info on hand would be nice
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
get LG kernel sources modify and compile using ubuntu
Does all of this require a super fast computer because the one Im fixing is an emachine with bare minimal hardware specs, aka-cheap computer
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
u know programming? java? c? c#?
My resources are limited, the only thing I have is this phone so any further education on Java programming is on hold....but yes I have experience with all you have said, I learned alot when I was using a G1...the only reason I ask is because I've heard word that downloading ics sources require a so called super computer, which I'm far from having, I'm lucky if the computer I do have is capable of running 2gb's of ram as far as storage is concerned, I'm only limited to the hard drive in the computer, I sold my 1tb external hard drive
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Kernel is different, an average laptop would do
Yeah I figured it would be, heck wish I had a laptop....
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
ccdreadcc said:
u know programming? java? c? c#?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no java no c# for kernel
---------- Post added at 07:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:27 PM ----------
terratrix said:
get LG kernel sources modify and compile using ubuntu
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LG source, search for Mobile phone P500
http://www.lg.com/global/support/opensource/opensource.jsp
---------- Post added at 07:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:28 PM ----------
DaxElectro said:
The title says so, wad i must be good at? I know that i must have ubuntu for compiling and creating... And what else?
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you only want to compile then ubuntu, compiler, linker would be enough
you must be good at C programming
and if you want to tweak to optimize, then you also need to have some understanding in micro digital electronic and also good understanding in processor or system architecture
sweetpotatoz said:
no java no c# for kernel
---------- Post added at 07:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:27 PM ----------
LG source, search for Mobile phone P500
http://www.lg.com/global/support/opensource/opensource.jsp
---------- Post added at 07:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:28 PM ----------
if you only want to compile then ubuntu, compiler, linker would be enough
you must be good at C programming
and if you want to tweak to optimize, then you also need to have some understanding in micro digital electronic and also good understanding in processor or system architecture
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@ terratrix, thanks!
Hmm, C programming? Can show me a dummy guide or it just coding? Need to renew code or something?
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk
Google is your friend. Anyway it's not a thing you learn in two-three days.
ZatBaloo said:
Google is your friend. Anyway it's not a thing you learn in two-three days.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I search in google but they give me ****s... Nevermind, i will try and get a consult by fserve or franco...
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk
DaxElectro said:
I search in google but they give me ****s... Nevermind, i will try and get a consult by fserve or franco...
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I know if you want a kernel,configure your workstation with this,or if you want CM kernel,use tuts on CM wiki. But if you want stock 2.2/2.3 LG froyo kernel,download it from LG website,then make.
After configuring repo BEFORE repo sync edit manifest.xml in WORKING_DIRECTORY and leave only kernel stuff,then modify sources and build
Kernel devs please correct me,I'm not sure at all for this one.
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/wiki/Building_Kernel_from_source
Related
Hey guys, just found this and I know it's not my phone, but it's pretty close.
Please don't flame for me just digging around
http://phandroid.com/2012/03/19/htc...xe-and-vivid-get-ics-kernel-source-published/
how would we know if they're similar if the Amaze one hasn't come out?
IDK if this is the same info but i found this one too http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/0...tion-sensation-xe-vivid-get-it-while-its-hot/
---------- Post added at 12:17 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:09 AM ----------
Veras1996 said:
how would we know if they're similar if the Amaze one hasn't come out?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seeing as they also dropped the Vivid source codes and it is very similar to the amaze I would think that the Vivid codes would be very close.
TramainM said:
IDK if this is the same info but i found this one too http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/0...tion-sensation-xe-vivid-get-it-while-its-hot/
---------- Post added at 12:17 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:09 AM ----------
Seeing as they also dropped the Vivid source codes and it is very similar to the amaze I would think that the Vivid codes would be very close.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So the vivids closer??? Man, ahh well, already started on this cyanogen mod port
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using XDA
dubt17 said:
So the vivids closer??? Man, ahh well, already started on this cyanogen mod port
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to late to bestow upon us another sense 3.5 from vivid or something else. IDK if anything ICS would work seeing as nothing is really booming with that
Hahaha, I wish, maybe after I gain some chops. I have no dev work in porting or modifying android whatsoever, but do know how to use Linux and there are some great tools out there!
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using XDA
I want to make my first ROM for s3 and thus I got dsixda kitchen.
I have windows 7 and ubuntu(kept for emergency) but i hate ubuntu and cant make rom on it, so installed cygwin.
It said tjat it needs some files from net bit when i click next the list of sources is empty, what to do now ?
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda premium
Does cygwin has a forum or mailing list?
The point is, it is hardly an android topic. Much less an S3 one.
Don't take the General forum that far.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
rishabho1 said:
I want to make my first ROM for s3 and thus I got dsixda kitchen.
I have windows 7 and ubuntu(kept for emergency) but i hate ubuntu and cant make rom on it, so installed cygwin.
It said tjat it needs some files from net bit when i click next the list of sources is empty, what to do now ?
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was able to setup cygwin on windows 7 64bit with no issues 2 days ago. Which version of .NET are you using? I am on 4.0.30320
---------- Post added at 02:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:02 PM ----------
Cygwin has a website, try requesting support from them. http://cygwin.com/problems.html
priyana said:
Does cygwin has a forum or mailing list?
The point is, it is hardly an android topic. Much less an S3 one.
Don't take the General forum that far.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd like to see this topic open as it is specific to gs3.
☞ sent from GS3 or Nexus
priyana said:
Does cygwin has a forum or mailing list?
The point is, it is hardly an android topic. Much less an S3 one.
Don't take the General forum that far.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also think it's absurd for somebody to use this forum to ask development related questions.
sargasso said:
I also think it's absurd for somebody to use this forum to ask development related questions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it is absurd that a person like you is on xda who believes that asking development related questions is ridiculous
You should leave xda if you dont like development
hisham027 said:
I was able to setup cygwin on windows 7 64bit with no issues 2 days ago. Which version of .NET are you using? I am on 4.0.30320
---------- Post added at 02:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:02 PM ----------
Cygwin has a website, try requesting support from them. http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anyways problem has been solved as I had some viruses
Which I discovered when my phone drivers were disapperring after every reboot.
Work shifted to my laptop from pc
Nice, good for you and bad for friends and family. Now it goes where ever you go
rishabho1 said:
I think it is absurd that a person like you is on xda who believes that asking development related questions is ridiculous
You should leave xda if you dont like development
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah. The fine art of irony and the casual reader. I hope you threw a tantrum.
This thread includes discussion and work product for porting the kernel kexec facility as a module, and related tools (kexec-tools). The basis is the Eternity project and all git code repositories maintain the history from Eternity.
The project stems from the desire to overcome the OTA 2.3.5 locked bootloader/signed kernel limitation. More ideas will likely come during the work, but the starting point is clear.
As for the 'misspell' of Electrify (as Elecrify) -- my apologies to the good folks with that phone. Sheesh! One little typo -- forever it lives.
Status
kexec_load.ko:
The module was modified with the necessary information from the Photon kernel (Electrify to come). It currently loads, and (apparently) runs safely. However, until the kexec-tools (and relevant dependencies) work properly, the module will just sit there. There will surely be bugs as it moves, so don't load it unless you just want to see it load.
Source code: http://gitorious.org/xda/photon-kexec-mod
kexec-tools:
The tools currently build and will run on the phone. The point at which to load kexec, though, remains a work in progress. Kernel loads, atags read in, and initrd reads successfully. Reboot (kexec -e) success remains elusive.
Source code: https://gitorious.org/xda/photon-kexec-tools
Second Init:
Coming soon as we can get it reasonably safe ... check for updates for when code is checked in.
Kernel and Related Sources from Motorola:
Photon: http://sourceforge.net/projects/photon4g.motorola/files/
Electrify: http://sourceforge.net/projects/electrify.motorola/files
Developer Listing
tdhite (that would be me)
twaffle
Indirect
more to come... (hopefully)
I will keep this post up to date with any relevant new information as development progresses.
For background on getting to this point, please read this thread before posting. Our good friend nickman529 just couldn't stand the OTA mess any longer and asked for a solution. Thanks also goes to our man Indirect for not letting us get away early with a [paraphrasing] "nah -- can't work, right?" attitude. Many others also had many great ideas -- just read the other thread! We don't seek to exclude anyone here.
Here we go ...
Amazing work guys. Waiting for electrify one
Keep good job
LightingZ said:
Amazing work guys. Waiting for electrify one
Keep good job
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gopi at Motorola has put it on the software groups plate to clean up the builds to ensure they are complete. No ETA as of yet for the source release, but generally it takes them anywhere from a day to a week to respond to the requests.
Even though I was the one whom suggested kexec to begin with...I'll look into it when I get some free time.
-ahem- http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=36190270&postcount=112
Sent from my hidden jewel
Indirect said:
Even though I was the one whom suggested kexec to begin with...I'll look into it when I get some free time.
-ahem- http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=36190270&postcount=112
Sent from my hidden jewel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey, I was looking at information back in October. Of course, at that point, I had never knew (or heard) of KExec.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1942046
---------- Post added at 02:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:00 PM ----------
twaffle said:
Gopi at Motorola has put it on the software groups plate to clean up the builds to ensure they are complete. No ETA as of yet for the source release, but generally it takes them anywhere from a day to a week to respond to the requests.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Updated information. Gopi requested that sources be provided by the end of the week. So possibly, by tomorrow.
twaffle said:
Hey, I was looking at information back in October. Of course, at that point, I had never knew (or heard) of KExec.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1942046
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was mainly directing that I didn't get -any- credit. Kind of insulting because when I first pointed it out it was like "No that'll never work" "Oh wait, no it will" and they completely skipped over me. >.>
Indirect said:
I was mainly directing that I didn't get -any- credit. Kind of insulting because when I first pointed it out it was like "No that'll never work" "Oh wait, no it will" and they completely skipped over me. >.>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, I want to wholeheartedly apologize. I do remember reading your post now, when I was scanning the message thread.
It was originally thought it could not work, as kexec is not enabled in our kernel. I had to point out that kexec *modules* exist, which is what makes this possible, when combined with the dynamic loading of modules from /system during the init process.
But your right, and should be noted in the OP, imho.
Indirect said:
I was mainly directing that I didn't get -any- credit. Kind of insulting because when I first pointed it out it was like "No that'll never work" "Oh wait, no it will" and they completely skipped over me. >.>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You look good in print -- re-read the original post. LOL. Just remember, though, all sorts of folks brought all sorts of good ideas, but I have to say you did push on Kexec, though many of us know it well -- thinking no way. Good on ya dude :highfive: -- sign up to develop if you can help.
twaffle said:
Gopi at Motorola has put it on the software groups plate to clean up the builds to ensure they are complete. No ETA as of yet for the source release, but generally it takes them anywhere from a day to a week to respond to the requests.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey -- how comfortable are most folks with grabbing the Android and kernel sources, then setting up development? It's a chore, but if I need to add that to the original post (a pseudo tutorial link) I can do that. I'll create a new 'tools' repo on the xda Gitorious project and checkin my scripts regardless.
Just lemme know.
Happily sign up to dev. I'll take a look tonight after I get home in about an hour.
Sent from my hidden jewel
First issue for us is that the build of kexec-tools creates improper executables due to no crt0.o -- mean no _startup symbol exists. NDK apps have this a lot, I just haven't had time to resolve.
Sent from my Slim Photon using xda app-developers app
twaffle said:
Hey, I was looking at information back in October. Of course, at that point, I had never knew (or heard) of KExec.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1942046
---------- Post added at 02:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:00 PM ----------
Updated information. Gopi requested that sources be provided by the end of the week. So possibly, by tomorrow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ELECTRIFY OSS source code is available for Releases : 4.5.1A_SUN_USC_16.7 and 4.5.1A_SUN_USC_19.0
I am happy to be able announce that the sources for the Electrify have been published.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/electrify.motorola/files/4.5.1A_SUN_USC_16.7/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/electrify.motorola/files/4.5.1A_SUN_USC_19.0/
Feel free to spread the word!
---------- Post added at 04:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:25 PM ----------
tags07 said:
ELECTRIFY OSS source code is available for Releases : 4.5.1A_SUN_USC_16.7 and 4.5.1A_SUN_USC_19.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You beat me to the punch! X-D
Hey, can someone share their Electrify config file so I can build down a module?
Just do the following and send me the file, or post it:
zcat /process/config.gz >/sdcard/config
Thx
Sent from my Slim Photon using xda app-developers app
# zcat /process/config.gz >/sdcard
config
zcat: /process/config.gz: No such file or directory
Sent from my Motorola Electrify using Tapatalk 2
---------- Post added at 01:33 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:27 AM ----------
Lol figured it was proc. Upload some.
Sent from my Motorola Electrify using Tapatalk 2
I have an Electrify MB853 to help. Just gotta get squared away here and get everything set-up. I'm an novice, but will do what I can and hope to learn a thing or two.
tdhite said:
Hey, can someone share their Electrify config file so I can build down a module?
Just do the following and send me the file, or post it:
zcat /process/config.gz >/sdcard/config
Thx
Sent from my Slim Photon using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried to do that but...
C:\Users\Itay>adb shell
$ su
su
# zcat /process/config.gz >/sdcard/config
zcat /process/config.gz >/sdcard/config
cannot create /sdcard/config: read-only file system
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
_____________________________________________________________________________
I have copied it with ES File manager =]
config.gz (13 KB)
https://mega.co.nz/#!H0I0iIJD!DmSkf2AfxqVw0WcR30e7ZR2XtFc-H2JLNmDc2bNz1gk
BTW i love MEGA.
Jst wanted to know .. is it unlocked bootloader...??? I m getting bore.. to use this 2.3.5 and frustrating. Is there any way to moved out 2.3.5 ?????
Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk
sonurajput56 said:
Jst wanted to know .. is it unlocked bootloader...??? I m getting bore.. to use this 2.3.5 and frustrating. Is there any way to moved out 2.3.5 ?????
Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bootloader on 2.3.5 is locked down pretty god, that's why tdhite is trying to get kexec to work for 2.3.5, it will allow us to insert a new kernel and 2init to run a custom rom on a locked bootloader.
Heres the conf: http://www.mediafire.com/?ii1rb23emkhavp9
LightingZ said:
Tried to do that but...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm... Seems Electrify does not mount a sdcard at /sdcard? Maybe /mnt/sdcard is the place. Over time I need to know (don't have an Electrify so I dunno how the mounts go).
Thanks for the config, regardless. I'll be working on the kexec-mod build today.
Hey, guys, with all due respect for Flapp and what's going on, the dude's kernels are something else, so i'd like to throw a mirror up here for y'all. I haven't cleared out my goomanager folder in months, so here's kernel versions 2.1 through 3.0.2, simply for the sake of archiving, which i'm OCD about. I personally use 3.0 redux with CM10 nightlies, due to the fact that it has the smartassV2 governor, but your mileage may vary.
By clicking this, you're agreeing not to act a fool and make anyone mad (Mediafire link)
EDIT: Sources, courtesy of some_other_guy
I've always preferred straight CM when possible, with a custom kernel to be able to overclock and have BLN, probably because I spent so long on Nexus devices before my Note, and the only other kernel that's out there is King Kangers, which I don't like using.
So far only h0tw1r3 and flappjaxxx have made kernels I can use and enjoy, so I hope when the CM 10.1 nightlies roll around, these older kernels will support it.
thanks for these, I went and downloaded them for safe keeping on my desktop. I hope he'll come back. :fingers-crossed:
If anybody has the touchwiz ics version they can share. I would greatly appreciate it.
Sent from my SGH-I717M using Tapatalk 2
Just to be clear on this, the Mighty Pulser_g2 posted>>>>Here
So OP it appears you are within standards. Thank You.
bigjoe2675 said:
Just to be clear on this, the Mighty Pulser_g2 posted>>>>Here
So OP it appears you are within standards. Thank You.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yessir, I did make sure that I was within GPL boundaries, seeing as how the code was open source
bigjoe2675 said:
Just to be clear on this, the Mighty Pulser_g2 posted>>>>Here
So OP it appears you are within standards. Thank You.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Link to the source must be made available if requested along side it for binary distribution.
Edit:
He won't be back. He is banned from XDA for life. Words from his own mouth. He misbehaved and is now getting his due punishment. He also apologizes to all who endured his rampages.
Known him personally for over 20 years. Has some issues he is trying to work through.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
some_other_guy said:
Link to the source must be made available if requested along side it for binary distribution.
Edit:
He won't be back. He is banned from XDA for life. Words from his own mouth. He misbehaved and is now getting his due punishment. He also apologizes to all who endured his rampages.
Known him personally for over 20 years. Has some issues he is trying to work through.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let him know that he'll be missed, but I'm sure he's thought it through by now.
bigjoe2675 said:
Just to be clear on this, the Mighty Pulser_g2 posted>>>>Here
So OP it appears you are within standards. Thank You.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
His post is correct that kernel source must be made available to all. But where flappjaxxx failed to be more specific is that if the kernel is to be distributed in it's compiled form the source must be made available as well. If the kernel is not being distributed publicly anywhere then of course said kernel may not even exist.
I will make it easy for everyone.
flappjaxxx's h0tcake kernel source
---------- Post added at 10:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:38 PM ----------
some_other_guy said:
Link to the source must be made available if requested along side it for binary distribution.
Edit:
He won't be back. He is banned from XDA for life. Words from his own mouth. He misbehaved and is now getting his due punishment. He also apologizes to all who endured his rampages.
Known him personally for over 20 years. Has some issues he is trying to work through.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In that case ....I hope he is able to beat whatever demons are plaguing him.
His talents are undisputed, but if leaving means healing, I'm good with that ...as he fights for his peace ....g
---------- Post added at 07:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:56 PM ----------
Jasonliw93 said:
If anybody has the touchwiz ics version they can share. I would greatly appreciate it.
Sent from my SGH-I717M using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed .....g
Jasonliw93 said:
If anybody has the touchwiz ics version they can share. I would greatly appreciate it.
Sent from my SGH-I717M using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure what you are looking for, but I have copy of SGH-1717-UCLF6-FJMod-B8.zip, this it?
some_other_guy said:
His post is correct that kernel source must be made available to all. But where flappjaxxx failed to be more specific is that if the kernel is to be distributed in it's compiled form the source must be made available as well. If the kernel is not being distributed publicly anywhere then of course said kernel may not even exist.
I will make it easy for everyone.
flappjaxxx's h0tcake kernel source
---------- Post added at 10:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:38 PM ----------
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info and BTW......
I have dual set of toggles in status bar. hire do I remove a set
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
troyolson92 said:
I have dual set of toggles in status bar. hire do I remove a set
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go into CM settings and uncheck your toggles.
Sent from my NookColor using xda app-developers app
I annotated the OP with the sources, thanks, bro.
yungskeeme said:
I tried to flash his aosp it's kernel and my screen wouldn't cut on. Any other kernels that would work with Flaps aosp ics rom!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which kernel did you flash? His ICS aosp? Did you wipe cache /dalvik cache before boot?
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD
roloracer said:
Which kernel did you flash? His ICS aosp? Did you wipe cache /dalvik cache before boot?
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes his ics aosp kernel.
h0tcakez-ICS-AOSP-kernel-v3.0.2.zip
I dont think I wiped caches.
Edit... I tried wiping cache before and after. No go
hello, what happens with
flappjaxxx?
Account currently disabled
his threads there are no appear
alexloz said:
hello, what happens with
flappjaxxx?
Account currently disabled
his threads there are no appear
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Member has moved on from XDA. Lets just leave it at that, please. Thread Closed, time to move on, Thanks
Im downloading files now but wish someone whould yell STOP! If they know it will screw my phone up. Should be fine, Right??
hackedout said:
Im downloading files now but wish someone whould yell STOP! If they know it will screw my phone up. Should be fine, Right??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where are the files located could you post a link?
Jk Found it.....
Tell me how it works out
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
No link. Ya just have to have linux on your pc. Theres a write up and in structions here. Use the search.
Yeah i found it lol...I went to the same page a few diffrent times and was looking for an actual download link lol. Im dual booting windows and ubuntu so im good. So did it work?
I just downloaded 12.4. Havent even put it on my pc yet I will though, soon, Ill post a report in a day or two.
I am in no way a dev. but I can do this. But if someone beats me to it then great.
I guess ill be the idiot to try it out.
+1 if it screws it up I got an old Atrix you can have.
Very interested to see how this will work out. Good luck and let us know how it goes
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Off topic but dose my n4g have loop back support? Can I boot real ubuntu on it?
Im kind of worried about doing this.
God speed my friend
____
Sent from my LG Original Gangsta
I just flashed this on my nexus and its OK to laggy and not much you can do right now
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
non ubuntu users could try this
http://www.droid-life.com/2013/02/21/how-to-flash-ubuntu-touch-preview-on-a-nexus-device-using-custom-recovery/
---------- Post added at 03:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:56 PM ----------
It works!!! Well this method does i didnt try the install from ubuntu.....Its not laggy for me
This is why the conversion rules......i wonder if it would work with out converting...mabey ill try that too
---------- Post added at 03:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:11 PM ----------
Edit Sometimes its difficult to use. Hopefully more work gets put into this to where i can come back and make it my daily
Dsmforlife92 said:
I just flashed this on my nexus and its OK to laggy and not much you can do right now
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you flash from the lg or from the converted lg
Edit: never mind read it again. Sorry
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Does phone and sms work on the phone?
Sent from my Nexus G using Tapatalk 2