A lot of weird issues that popup while running Uruk Droid from the SD card may actually be the result of the card itself not being able to handle the constant read/write. Even if the card is labeled a class 10 you may get worse performance than the stock. I know, I used a class 10 for a week or two and it was essentially unusable, so I moved Uruk to the internal storage.
Use this thread to post your experiences and test speeds for the various SD cards. If you can, use $auron's method for some uniform baseline, but a general description of the experience is important because some of the issues don't seem to be captured by a speed test. Of course, please list the card's make and class as well as size.
Please use $auron's method in post 3 for testing.
Post results in this format, to the extent possible:
Manufacturer/brand name:
Card size:
Card class:
Card URL:
Filesystem type (/data partition):
Performance feelings:
Performance details:
Results:
p0rk burn Manufacturer/brand name: Wintec Filemate
Card size:16 gb
Card class: 10
Card URL: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820161405
Filesystem type (/data): ext4
Performance feelings: Horrible, don't use this card to run Uruk.
Performance details: (DD method) = 4.545 Mb/s, constant services crash, browsing almost unusable, not worth the hassle.
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 2588.8
Your metadata score is: 28283.5
localhost, 128M,768,32,2916,3,580,0,413,14,11067,7,7,5,0,16,16,0,27991,77,15,13,0,+++++,+++,11,0
SDCard by 52018 (0x1 manufacture date 12/2010, oemid 0x4245
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ripper2k8 (DD tests)Lexar 2GB, unclassified: 6,25MB/s
Adata 4GB, class6: 6,25MB/s
Sandisk 8GB, class 2: 6,66MB/s
Sandisk 8GB, class 4: 6,0MB/s (and dead now, so not available for future tests....
$auronManufacturer/brand name: Lexar
Card size: 16GB
Card class: 6
Card URL: http://www.lexar.com/products/lexar-...erformance-kit
Performance feelings: Ok - better then internal system on ext3 (haven't checked internal with ext4)
Performance details:
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 4847.8
Your metadata score is: 2328.3
localhost,128M,2242,78,6313,6,5014,5,2984,98,17486 ,9,20.3,0,16,93,1,+++++,+++,73,0,94,1,+++++,+++,68 ,0
SDCard by LEXAR (0x1 manufacture date 10/2010, oemid 0x4245
-----------------------------------------------------------------
chocolate5215Manufacturer/brand name: KingMax
Card size: 16 GB
Card class: 10
Card URL: http://www.kingmax.com/en_03_product_content.asp?sn=31
Performance feelings: good
Performance details:
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 5508.6
Your metadata score is: 2341.3
localhost,128M,2365,84,7647,9,5543,5,2867,95,19371 ,12,16.3,0,16,89,1,+++++,+++,94,1,95,1,+++++,+++,7 7,0
SDCard by SD16G (0x0 manufacture date 12/2010, oemid 0x4b47
-----------------------------------------------------------------
cjdalessioManufacturer/brand name: Kingston
Card size: 16GB
Card class: 10
Card URL: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0036V9AGU
Perforce feeling: Ok - bit better than internal system on average, except Media Scan which takes FOREVER (may not be due to card - it has no media on it whatsoever)
I'll dig up numbers again specifically, but a previous test on the vfat partition rendered results in the mid 6MB/S ballpark if I remember correctly. Kingston is known for being a bit on the slow side of things.
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 5398.4
Your metadata score is: 28952.1
localhost,128M,2045,72,7866,8,5461,5,2974,98,18296 ,10,14.1,0,16,28,0,28295,45,24,0,25,0,+++++,+++,16 ,0
SDCard by SD16G (0x3 manufacture date 09/2010, oemid 0x3432
-----------------------------------------------------------------
nimrodityI did a Test on the internal disk with ext4
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 6221
Your metadata score is: 2419.4
localhost,128M,2768,84,11084,11,7622,7,3322,97,167 09,9,147.4,0,16,86,1,+++++,+++,61,0,87,1,+++++,+++ ,58,0
thefunkygibbonManufacturer/brand name: sandisk
Card size: 8 GB
Card class: 4
Card URL: ?
Performance feelingsk
Performance details:
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 5833.8
Your metadata score is: 11598.4
localhost,128M,2204,79,9700,12,6704,7,2783,96,1807 8,12,40.4,0,16,97,2,+++++,+++,59,0,78,1,10621,31,4 3,0
SDCard by SU08G (0x8 manufacture date 09/2008, oemid 0x5344
d31b0yManufacturer/brand name: Kingston
Card size: 16GB
Card class: 10
Card URL: Generic / Specific
Performance feelings: Performance seems great. Very responsive. Get the very odd wait / force close but normally just clicking wait will kick it into gear after a minute.
Performance details:
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 5370.6
Your metadata score is: 2122
localhost,128M,2395,84,8150,9,5429,5,2945,97,18184,10,15.0,0,16,31,0,+++++,+++,24,0,32,0,+++++,+++,20,0
SDCard by SD16G (0x3 manufacture date 09/2010, oemid 0x3432
-----------------------------------------------------------------
snickleManufacturer/brand name: Kingston
Card size: 16GB
Card class: 10
Card URL:
Performance feelings: Ok
Performance details:
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 4915.2
Your metadata score is: 36001.7
localhost,128M,2014,70,8129,9,3820,4,2813,93,17100 ,10,15.7,0,16,37,0,15099,41,27,0,34,0,21874,70,25, 0
SDCard by SD16G (0x3 manufacture date 09/2010, oemid 0x3432
-----------------------------------------------------------------
squirlierManufacturer/brand name: Sandisk
Card size: 16GB
Card class: 2
Card URL:
Performance feelings: good.
Performance details:
---------------------
Your throughput score is: 2927
Your metadata score is: 22536.7
localhost,128M,2080,73,4686,5,2911,3,2622,90,11186 ,6,151.7,2,16,93,1,14544,29,85,1,42,0,8356,47,75,1
SDCard by SU16G (0x8: ) manufacture date 08/2010, oemid 0x5344
---------------------
fnetfManufacturer/brand name: Sandisk
Card size: 16GB
Card class: 2
Card URL:
Performance feelings: Really good
Performance details:
---------------------
Your throughput score is: 2848.6
Your metadata score is: 2520.1
localhost,128M,2052,72,5018,6,3323,3,2819,94,10081 ,6,189.1,2,16,96,1,85,0,109,1
SDCard by SU16G (0x8: ) manufacture date 05/2010, oemid 0x5344
My overall performance is quite good everything running smooth and got plenty of apps and widgets running !!!
butlermManufacturer/brand name: Wintec filemate
Card size: 16GB
Card class: 10
Card URL:
Filesystem type (/data partition): ext4
Performance feelings: hit and miss on responsiveness.
Performance details:
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 4959
Your metadata score is: 2367.8
localhost,128M,2033,90,6043,9,5542,6,2195,91,19382 ,12,12.8,0,16,111,1,+++++,+++,100,1,118,2,+++++,++ +,76,1
SDCard by 50272 (0x1 manufacture date 12/2010, oemid 0x4245
-----------------------------------------------------------------
digger94Manufacturer/brand name:
Card size: 4GB
Card class: 4
Card URL: x
Filesystem type (/data partition): EXT4
Performance feelings: not so good, little slow
Performance details: Little slow executing applications.
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 4157.8
Your metadata score is: 2197.2
localhost,128M,1537,67,5514,7,4311,5,2382,98,16395 ,10,45.2,0,16,54,1,+++++,+++,32,0,54,1,+++++,+++,3 2,0
SDCard by SA04G (0x0 manufacture date 07/2009, oemid 0x544d
-----------------------------------------------------------------
$auronManufacturer/brand name: Kingstone
Card size: 8GB
Card class: 4
Card URL:
Filesystem type (/data partition): ext4
Performance feelings: quite terrible system is slow and unresponsive
Performance details:
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 3111.8
Your metadata score is: 176.5
localhost,128M,607,23,2467,6,2177,3,2445,83,14163, 11,11.5,0,16,56,1,+++++,+++,41,0,56,1,+++++,+++,32 ,0
SDCard by SA08G (0x0 manufacture date 10/2010, oemid 0x544d
-----------------------------------------------------------------
$auronManufacturer/brand name: Sandisk
Card size: 4GB
Card class: 2
Card URL:
Filesystem type (/data partition): ext4
Performance feelings: good - works smooth and easy
Performance details:
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 4772.6
Your metadata score is: 339.2
localhost,128M,2427,93,6111,16,4809,6,2956,99,1881 0,11,42.2,0,16,99,1,+++++,+++,62,0,93,1,+++++,+++, 63,0
SDCard by SU04G (0x8 manufacture date 10/2008, oemid 0x5344
----------------------------------------------------------------
KrainManufacturer/brand name: Silicon Power
Card size: 8GB
Card class: 10
Card URL: http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B004...ef=oss_product
Filesystem type: ext4
Performance feelings: great
Performance details:
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 6170.8
Your metadata score is: 216.3
localhost,128M,2509,88,10532,12,7006,8,2918,97,186 89,11,23.3,0,16,50,0,+++++,+++,53,0,58,0,+++++,+++ ,32,0
SDCard by NCard (0x1 manufacture date 10/2010, oemid 0x0303
-----------------------------------------------------------------
butlerm1977 (Uruk .6 test)Manufacturer/brand name: Wintec filemate
Card size: 16GB
Card class: 10
Card URL:
Filesystem type (/data partition): ext4
Performance feelings: fresh install of Uruk 0.6
Performance details: big increase on throughput since my Uruk 0.5 test. this test was run right after the OS install. no other apps (other than Google Marketplace) have been installed at this point.
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 5812
Your metadata score is: 2221.4
localhost,128M,2363,83,8504,10,6249,6,2897,96,1939 7,12,16.4,0,16,55,0,+++++,+++,68,0,46,0,+++++,+++, 36,0
SDCard by 50272 (0x1 manufacture date 12/2010, oemid 0x4245
-----------------------------------------------------------------
p0rk burn (Uruk .6 test)Throughput: 5755.5
Metadata: 376.4
localhost,128M,195B,86,9339,13,6389,6,2373,98,19367,10,15,4,0,16,116,2,+++++,+++,107,1,114,2,+++++,+++,84,1
N23Manufacturer/brand name: Transcend
Card size: 8GB
Card class: 6
Card URL: http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B001...ef=oss_product
Filesystem type (/data partition): ext4
Performance feelings: okay
Performance details:
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 6274.8
Your metadata score is: 212
localhost,128M,2094,74,9783,10,7078,7,2935,97,1943 4,11,25.0,0,16,50,0,+++++,+++,55,0,47,0,+++++,+++, 35,0
SDCard by USD (0x1 manufacture date 12/2010, oemid 0x4142
-----------------------------------------------------------------
$auron's internal test (v2)------------------- Please report this data (V2) -------------------
Your throughput score is: 6508.07
Your metadata score is: 362.5
1.96,1.96,localhost,1,1298155133,128M,,76,98,12383 ,16,7895,8,551,96,19301,11,252.4,6,25,10,1,,,29,1, 1040,10,58,1,29,1,1122,10,35,0,192ms,740ms,610ms,9 2391us,19795us,1051ms,4031ms,202ms,2787ms,3868ms,4 0140us,6472ms
------------------------------------------------------------------
butlerm1977(different wintec class 10 16gb card - no errors experienced)
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 5556.8
Your metadata score is: 227.8
localhost,128M,2422,85,7896,9,5255,5,2981,99,19680 ,11,16.8,0,16,62,0,+++++,+++,67,0,46,0,+++++,+++,3 6,0
SDCard by 50272 (0x1 manufacture date 12/2010, oemid 0x4245
-----------------------------------------------------------------
sazfar13Manufacturer/brand name: Patriot
Card size: 2GB
Card class: ?
Card URL: http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applicatio...?EdpNo=3869652
Your throughput score is: 4477
Your metadata score is: 206.1
localhost,128M,2023,70,5612,6,4209,4,2799,93,16792 ,8,43.1,0,16,51,0,+++++,+++,31,0,48,0,+++++,+++,33 ,0
SDCard by SA02G (0x0 manufacture date 12/2009, oemid 0x544d
N23Manufacturer/brand name: Transcend
Card size: 8GB
Card class: 6
Card URL: http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B001...ef=oss_product
Filesystem type (/data partition): ext4
Performance feelings: nice (using 0.7RC2)
Performance details:
------------------- Please report this data (V2) -------------------
Your throughput score is: 5907.48
Your metadata score is: 437.833
1.96,1.96,localhost,1,1298710940,128M,,35,49,10699 ,15,6972,8,263,49,18249,11,24.9,1,25,10,1,,,40,1,1 249,11,58,1,40,1,1361,12,35,0,716ms,1372ms,1863ms, 44349us,93398us,3502ms,3780ms,104ms,3212ms,3679ms, 89432us,5112ms
SDCard by USD (0x1 manufacture date 12/2010, oemid 0x4142
------------------------------------------------------------------
$auron's feedback results graph:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I've created script with some io tests (based on bonnie++) - it should check both raw r/w and small files operations. It should be more precise that above script with dd (witch is of course also good - but can be not fully true if some sd cards prefer some specific block sizes)
Since UrukDroid 0.6 this script is installed by default. For older releases you can use this one:
File: UrukDroid-0.5-iobench.tbz2.
Save it with browser directly on Archos to /data/UrukUpdate (not over USB!).
How to run test?
To run the test, connect archos to power supply and run from shell
Code:
su
iobench.sh
Test run looks like this:
Code:
[[email protected] tst]# iobench.sh
Turning on max CPU frequency: 1000000 hz
Performing disk (/data) IO test. Test make take about 1h on slower systems - please connect device to power supply!
Done: 0%...12%...20%...28%...36%...44%...52%...60%...68%...76%...84%...92%...100%
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 4847.8
Your metadata score is: 2328.3
localhost,128M,2242,78,6313,6,5014,5,2984,98,17486,9,20.3,0,16,93,1,+++++,+++,73,0,94,1,+++++,+++,68,0
SDCard by LEXAR (0x1:) manufacture date 10/2010, oemid 0x4245
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Restoring previous cpu setting....
What does tests do?
It creates files with different method (per char, per block, in sequential or random order) - this is throughput part.
Second tests check how fast we can create/access/remove files. More you can read about tool called bonnie++ on Internet.
So called score is just for you - it may be not precise, full precise data are in line below score.
How to report results?
I've tried to get as much data as I can from system level - but it does not give info about class level and brand name of SD card (witch can be different from manufacturer name). So this data must be added by user. My proposal is:
Manufacturer/brand name:
Card size:
Card class:
Card URL:
Filesystem type (/data partition):
Performance feelings:
Performance details:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In performance details please cut/paste results from iobench.sh output - lines between ---- -----
How to buy cards?
Check graph from second post and try to get card that has possibly best metadata operation with throughput. Thumb rule is not to buy cards that has metadata operations below average - that is below red line.
Scores
I used the dd test and got the following scores:
Lexar 2GB, unclassified: 6,25MB/s
Adata 4GB, class6: 6,25MB/s
Sandisk 8GB, class 2: 6,66MB/s
Sandisk 8GB, class 4: 6,0MB/s (and dead now, so not available for future tests....
Not helping much I quess....
But maybe this helps:
I also tested under Windows with HD Speed from steelbytes, I found the standard block sizes of up to 8KB resulted in horrible, unstable performance. From 256KB up to 1MB performance became much more stable.
Ripper2K8 said:
I also tested under Windows with HD Speed from steelbytes, I found the standard block sizes of up to 8KB resulted in horrible, unstable performance. From 256KB up to 1MB performance became much more stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well - after few tests made by people - we will see if overall filling is connected with some test results. Or we need to do other tests - like iozone (witch tries different portion of data sizes during write)
Manufacturer/brand name: Lexar
Card size: 16GB
Card class: 6
Card URL: http://www.lexar.com/products/lexar-high-speed-microsdhc-card-performance-kit
Filesystem type: ext4
Performance feelings: Ok - better then internal system on ext3 (haven't checked internal with ext4)
Performance details:
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 4847.8
Your metadata score is: 2328.3
localhost,128M,2242,78,6313,6,5014,5,2984,98,17486,9,20.3,0,16,93,1,+++++,+++,73,0,94,1,+++++,+++,68,0
SDCard by LEXAR (0x1 manufacture date 10/2010, oemid 0x4245
-----------------------------------------------------------------
------------------- Please report this data (V2) -------------------
Your throughput score is: 3638.25
Your metadata score is: 401.833
1.96,1.96,urukdroid,1,1299006218,128M,,69,91,1693,2,1483,1,524,96,19249,11,17.5,0,25,10,1,,,32,1,1268,16,51,1,31,1,1214,18,37,0,1704ms,13439ms,9781ms,109ms,54443us,4825ms,5339ms,102ms,6353ms,6252ms,519ms,5496ms
SDCard by LEXAR (0x1 manufacture date 10/2010, oemid 0x4245
------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer/brand name: Kingston
Card size: 16GB
Card class: 10
Card URL: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0036V9AGU
Perforce feeling: Ok - bit better than internal system on average, except Media Scan which takes FOREVER (may not be due to card - it has no media on it whatsoever)
I'll dig up numbers again specifically, but a previous test on the vfat partition rendered results in the mid 6MB/S ballpark if I remember correctly. Kingston is known for being a bit on the slow side of things.
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 5398.4
Your metadata score is: 28952.1
localhost,128M,2045,72,7866,8,5461,5,2974,98,18296,10,14.1,0,16,28,0,28295,45,24,0,25,0,+++++,+++,16,0
SDCard by SD16G (0x3 manufacture date 09/2010, oemid 0x3432
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I die a Test on the internal disk with ext4
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 6221
Your metadata score is: 2419.4
localhost,128M,2768,84,11084,11,7622,7,3322,97,16709,9,147.4,0,16,86,1,+++++,+++,61,0,87,1,+++++,+++,58,0
Here are results of tests by: chocolate5215 (can't post because xda restrictions)
In advance - please send publication requests to p0rk burn - it's his initiative I merely made testing package...
Manufacturer/brand name: KingMax
Card size: 16 GB
Card class: 10
Card URL: http://www.kingmax.com/en_03_product_content.asp?sn=31
Performance feelings: good
Performance details:
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 5508.6
Your metadata score is: 2341.3
localhost,128M,2365,84,7647,9,5543,5,2867,95,19371 ,12,16.3,0,16,89,1,+++++,+++,94,1,95,1,+++++,+++,7 7,0
SDCard by SD16G (0x0 manufacture date 12/2010, oemid 0x4b47
-----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sakoman.com/OMAP/microsd-card-perfomance-test-results.html
Manufacturer/brand name: sandisk
Card size: 8 GB
Card class: 4
Card URL: ?
Performance feelings:ok
Performance details:
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 5833.8
Your metadata score is: 11598.4
localhost,128M,2204,79,9700,12,6704,7,2783,96,18078,12,40.4,0,16,97,2,+++++,+++,59,0,78,1,10621,31,43,0
SDCard by SU08G (0x8 manufacture date 09/2008, oemid 0x5344
Not sure if those figures mean good or bad but I've previously benched it at 10mb write/20mb read
Manufacturer/brand name: Kingston
Card size: 16GB
Card class: 10
Card URL: Generic / Specific
Performance feelings: Performance seems great. Very responsive. Get the very odd wait / force close but normally just clicking wait will kick it into gear after a minute.
Performance details:
Code:
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 5370.6
Your metadata score is: 2122
localhost,128M,2395,84,8150,9,5429,5,2945,97,18184,10,15.0,0,16,31,0,+++++,+++,24,0,32,0,+++++,+++,20,0
SDCard by SD16G (0x3:) manufacture date 09/2010, oemid 0x3432
-----------------------------------------------------------------
cjdalessio said:
Manufacturer/brand name: Kingston
Card size: 16GB
Card class: 10
Card URL: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0036V9AGU
Perforce feeling: Ok - bit better than internal system on average, except Media Scan which takes FOREVER (may not be due to card - it has no media on it whatsoever)
I'll dig up numbers again specifically, but a previous test on the vfat partition rendered results in the mid 6MB/S ballpark if I remember correctly. Kingston is known for being a bit on the slow side of things.
Code:
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 5398.4
Your metadata score is: 28952.1
localhost,128M,2045,72,7866,8,5461,5,2974,98,18296,10,14.1,0,16,28,0,28295,45,24,0,25,0,+++++,+++,16,0
SDCard by SD16G (0x3:) manufacture date 09/2010, oemid 0x3432
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, same card as cjdalessio but I don't really have the same issues as he does. Our metadata scores are completely different, similar throughput. What does the metadata score signify?
d31b0y said:
Hmm, same card as cjdalessio but I don't really have the same issues as he does. Our metadata scores are completely different, similar throughput. What does the metadata score signify?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like I said - score is just for you and it's not "real" benchmark result. I had to made some assumptions (that I've implemented in test - it still needs to be calibrated). While doing metadate test sometimes it runs too quick to be measured - that's why you can see in the last line of result some "+++++". I've substituted this "unmeasured" value with some number for score purpose - it's obviously to small. When you compare this line (with many coma separated number) they are almost identical.
And mediascanner - it's speed depends on how many small files you have and how your directory are "protected" with ".nomedia" lock.
Manufacturer/brand name: Kingston
Card size: 16GB
Card class: 10
Card URL:
Performance feelings: Ok
Performance details:
------------------- Please report this data ---------------------
Your throughput score is: 4915.2
Your metadata score is: 36001.7
localhost,128M,2014,70,8129,9,3820,4,2813,93,17100,10,15.7,0,16,37,0,15099,41,27,0,34,0,21874,70,25,0
SDCard by SD16G (0x3 manufacture date 09/2010, oemid 0x3432
-----------------------------------------------------------------
So... mediascanner seems to start any time you touch the filesystem. I think these results may be tainted with that right now. Not sure but suspecting. Trying to get some data to back that up.
cjdalessio said:
So... mediascanner seems to start any time you touch the filesystem. I think these results may be tainted with that right now. Not sure but suspecting. Trying to get some data to back that up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In Uruk 0.6 mediascanner can be disabled - and run on demand (we are testing it now and Solune is changing it's UrukConfig to back it up)
Excellent. Enough work today so I won't try it now but will try this weekend I think (expecting nasty snow the next couple days so may find time sooner.)
Via squirlier -
Manufacturer/brand name: Sandisk
Card size: 16GB
Card class: 2
Card URL:
Performance feelings: good.
Performance details:
---------------------
Your throughput score is: 2927
Your metadata score is: 22536.7
localhost,128M,2080,73,4686,5,2911,3,2622,90,11186 ,6,151.7,2,16,93,1,14544,29,85,1,42,0,8356,47,75,1
SDCard by SU16G (0x8: ) manufacture date 08/2010, oemid 0x5344
---------------------
I must say that nimrodity test on internal gave me some thinking - i'll test it then since it looks quite promising.
I've change some calculation (so your's "scores" may be not the same as on graph) - but this changes have been also put to iobench.sh (this are mostly fixes since sometimes " " empty chars made calculation wrong).
I've added also in description "filesystem type" since I've assumed it's always ext4 - but some of you switch back to ext3 - so please update this information (i'm talking about filesystem of /data partition).
We need some "bad" sdcard results! So please if you have some cards that feels to work badly/terrible - please test it
Like for now I guess that metadata score/tests has bigger influence on system "smoothness" (and this is what I was able to tell without test anyway) - but we needs some proofs and measure of this - bad card needed
V0.5 run smooth on my A70IT
Manufacturer/brand name: Sandisk
Card size: 16GB
Card class: 2
Card URL:
Performance feelings: Really good
Performance details:
---------------------
Your throughput score is: 2848.6
Your metadata score is: 2520.1
localhost,128M,2052,72,5018,6,3323,3,2819,94,10081 ,6,189.1,2,16,96,1,85,0,109,1
SDCard by SU16G (0x8: ) manufacture date 05/2010, oemid 0x5344
My overall performance is quite good everything running smooth and got plenty of apps and widgets running !!!