Hi I have found the way to port ICS to the galaxy players. :
http://www.freeyourandroid.com/guide/compile-ics
The problem is that I can't find the binaries for the galaxy player. Where I can find them?
arent they located in /system/bin?
Need root first though
(I would help out with this, but dont really know how to do it, and i dont have the player yet)
zaclimon said:
Hi I have found the way to port ICS to the galaxy players. :
http://www.freeyourandroid.com/guide/compile-ics
The problem is that I can't find the binaries for the galaxy player. Where I can find them?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will this actually boot and run? If it's that "easy", then why don't more devices have ICS? If you can extract the binaries and cook up a rom, I would be happy to test it . Also, if I have time later this week, I'll try to follow those instructions and then post my results. If everything works on the first try, I'll be very surprised but not at all dissapointed . Thanks for sharing this
Dyskmaster said:
Will this actually boot and run? If it's that "easy", then why don't more devices have ICS? If you can extract the binaries and cook up a rom, I would be happy to test it . Also, if I have time later this week, I'll try to follow those instructions and then post my results. If everything works on the first try, I'll be very surprised but not at all dissapointed . Thanks for sharing this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well maybe because people don't know how to do it. And as for the current rom the major problem is the hardware acceleration and the camera. Maybe We can find it (The binairies) at opensource.samsung.com
It should be easier than phones because you don't have to worry about not screwing with voice, data, and stuff like that. Just get it on and get all the apps working correctly. Radios are always the hardest.
I've also been triyng to compile the source for the player but i wasnt able to do so, the thing is that the source compiles fine with the pre-adjustments it comes with, i mean the androidboard.mk ( i think thats the name of the file not sure), but when i changed the variables for a armv5 build, which is the core of the device and the ones that comes in the same file on the opensource.samsung soource, it just doesnt compile and throws some kind of errors about some libraries that i didnt touched. i dont know what i had been doing wrong.
I Also found this video in which they show whats in every folder, and how to build and add packages from source to the build:
http://marakana.com/forums/android/general/269.html
This is a detail process description from the official android site to build from source, very similar like the one zaclimon found:
http://source.android.com/source/initializing.html
The source from samsung doesnt have all the drivers, just the alsa audio driver, i guess we gonna have to find a way to get the binaries like cyanogen did, maybe get some scripts they use and try to do it ourselves:
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/wiki/Sa...le_CyanogenMod_(Linux)#Copy_proprietary_files
it is done through the adb, but the thing is to get those files, maybe we could ask that fellow some help for this step, since he has the experience.
sodomywar said:
I've also been triyng to compile the source for the player but i wasnt able to do so, the thing is that the source compiles fine with the pre-adjustments it comes with, i mean the androidboard.mk ( i think thats the name of the file not sure), but when i changed the variables for a armv5 build, which is the core of the device and the ones that comes in the same file on the opensource.samsung soource, it just doesnt compile and throws some kind of errors about some libraries that i didnt touched. i dont know what i had been doing wrong.
I Also found this video in which they show whats in every folder, and how to build and add packages from source to the build:
http://marakana.com/forums/android/general/269.html
This is a detail process description from the official android site to build from source, very similar like the one zaclimon found:
http://source.android.com/source/initializing.html
The source from samsung doesnt have all the drivers, just the alsa audio driver, i guess we gonna have to find a way to get the binaries like cyanogen did, maybe get some scripts they use and try to do it ourselves:
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/wiki/Sa...le_CyanogenMod_(Linux)#Copy_proprietary_files
it is done through the adb, but the thing is to get those files, maybe we could ask that fellow some help for this step, since he has the experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The core is a ARMv7 right? because the hummingbird processor is a ARMv7. Maybe it did failed because of that? I found the gpu drivers from the opensource. Check in the kernel folder. If I can give you the gpu file if you want. Well tell me what files you are missing i'll find to give it to you. (Well I don't know how to program so I try do to my best.)
EDIT: Also its seem that to compile ICS is more difficult than the other versions. We do need ubuntu to extract the binaries right?
EDIT2: People are saying that it's easier to build from CM9 than from the source. It is right or it's the same thing?
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/38960-build-your-own-cm9ics-preview-on-ubuntu-and-perhaps-debian/
Galaxy S Phone
Shouldn't you just be able to modify a Galaxy S ICS port and take out the data and other stuff you don't need?
zaclimon said:
The core is a ARMv7 right? because the hummingbird processor is a ARMv7. Maybe it did failed because of that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, i configured it with the files of the samsung source, and it said ARMv5, we need to know which one it is, probably faild because of libaries compatibilities for that architecture.
zaclimon said:
EDIT: Also its seem that to compile ICS is more difficult than the other versions. We do need ubuntu to extract the binaries right?
EDIT2: People are saying that it's easier to build from CM9 than from the source. It is right or it's the same thing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe it is easier than the official source, they modify the source and takes out some things that cellphones dont need 'cause the source it's made for all devices, so it could be smaller and easier to compile, i'm gonna try this port and let ya' know, it will take a while since the source it's huge
Would be great if a couple of us do it, if you can @zaclimon try it, you don't need ubuntu, if you know which libaries that command has (sudo apt-get install build-essential). I have debian and i compiled the source just fine, debian has a minimal installation (no X11) but to compile source you dont need anything else! Let me know if anyone else it's triyng we could excahnge some ideas!
sodomywar said:
Well, i configured it with the files of the samsung source, and it said ARMv5, we need to know which one it is, probably faild because of libaries compatibilities for that architecture.
Maybe it is easier than the official source, they modify the source and takes out some things that cellphones dont need 'cause the source it's made for all devices, so it could be smaller and easier to compile, i'm gonna try this port and let ya' know, it will take a while since the source it's huge
Would be great if a couple of us do it, if you can @zaclimon try it, you don't need ubuntu, if you know which libaries that command has (sudo apt-get install build-essential). I have debian and i compiled the source just fine, debian has a minimal installation (no X11) but to compile source you dont need anything else! Let me know if anyone else it's triyng we could excahnge some ideas!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how many MB or GB the source has because I can't exceed my download's limitations?
EDIT: I'm a linux newbie. Is Ubuntu is the same thing as debian? Because Ubuntu is debian based right?
EDIT2: nevermind I'll be using ubuntu
alltellmobile said:
Shouldn't you just be able to modify a Galaxy S ICS port and take out the data and other stuff you don't need?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if we can (we should ask permissions) but it's definitly possible.
zaclimon said:
EDIT: I'm a linux newbie. Is Ubuntu is the same thing as debian? Because Ubuntu is debian based right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea Ubuntu should be pretty much the same.
Wish I knew how to program, because i would help out.
alltellmobile said:
Yea Ubuntu should be pretty much the same.
Wish I knew how to program, because i would help out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can help I follow the tutorials there:
http://www.freeyourandroid.com/guide/compile-ics
http://marakana.com/forums/android/general/269.html
Ok i was reading the first tutorial and got to the part about binaries for graphics acceleration; wouldn't we have to get ours before we compile it. Also i only have the US version of the galaxy player and if i made an image i couldn't test it because we don't have a custom recovery for ours.
alltellmobile said:
Ok i was reading the first tutorial and got to the part about binaries for graphics acceleration; wouldn't we have to get ours before we compile it. Also i only have the US version of the galaxy player and if i made an image i couldn't test it because we don't have a custom recovery for ours.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh that's true well you can try to port a custom recovery?
zaclimon said:
Oh that's true well you can try to port a custom recovery?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HaHa I'm not that good. that sounds way more complicated
hey guys, i've been following this thread and hopefully i can be of some help...
i'm currently in the process of pulling the system files from the original gingerbread build from the SGP...it looks like there will be some trial and error here comparing that of the nexus s build...correct me if i'm wrong, but is this where most of the proprietary libraries are located for the device?
i'm willing to engineer a generic build, described in the video tutorial and making the necessary adjustments for the ARMv7 board...
this is my first attempt at compiling Android source, so maybe we will have something or maybe i will have a good ol' brick...thanks for the great tutorial and video @zaclimon this has definitely shed some light on porting ICS for SGP
jdale38 said:
hey guys, i've been following this thread and hopefully i can be of some help...
i'm currently in the process of pulling the system files from the original gingerbread build from the SGP...it looks like there will be some trial and error here comparing that of the nexus s build...correct me if i'm wrong, but is this where most of the proprietary libraries are located for the device?
i'm willing to engineer a generic build, described in the video tutorial and making the necessary adjustments for the ARMv7 board...
this is my first attempt at compiling Android source, so maybe we will have something or maybe i will have a good ol' brick...thanks for the great tutorial and video @zaclimon this has definitely shed some light on porting ICS for SGP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes they are supposed to be there. But I have download all the source code of the firmware from opensource.samsung.com
Me and sodomywar are working with the internationnal version of the SGP4. If you want to join you're welcome.
EDIT: No problem for the tutorials.
alltellmobile said:
HaHa I'm not that good. that sounds way more complicated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google is your friend
So this is where i'm at currently. I'm trying to compile and I got this error:
Code:
build/core/base_rules.mk:166: *** system/extras/ext4_utils: MODULE.TARGET.EXECUTABLES.setup_fs already defined by device/samsung/galaxyplayer. Stop.
Does anyone know how to remove that error?
EDIT: nvm I managed to remove this error.
Related
Hello,
I believe a lot of us would like to do it, so let's please describe here how-to:
1. Linux
2. Mac os Leo
3. Windows
Gurus, please contribute!
Excellent initiative, I could write a short howto for Arch Linux later.
But one thing though, it might be a good idea to mention in the first post that you can't actually boot a custom kernel yet.
ddewbofh said:
Excellent initiative, I could write a short howto for Arch Linux later.
But one thing though, it might be a good idea to mention in the first post that you can't actually boot a custom kernel yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed agree, but to try we need to have it!
My topic about compiling kernel sources has already many infos so do you think another similar topic is really necessary ?
alx5962 said:
My topic about compiling kernel sources has already many infos so do you think another similar topic is really necessary ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your thread is excellent but I'd guess that this thread would be more oriented towards "hand-holding", really basic guides. Your topic was very broad requiring going to the android developers site and reading their docs on cross-compilation. Gathering that info into easier guides could be beneficial, if not to demystify the process.
As it stands right now just compiling modules seems almost insurmountable. But if the information needed could be condensed into simple guides it could show that while it takes considerable time and effort it's not an impossible task even for developers not familiar with cross-compiling kernels.
And information information on setting up cross-compilers for Win, Mac and popular Linux distros is nice to have available in an easy to find topic anyway.
IMHO, the easiest way to make modules would be a virtualbox image already set up with arm gcc, kernel sources and X10 kernel config. It's a long process to set everything up; virtualbox makes this easier and cross platform.
maxrfon said:
Hello,
I believe a lot of us would like to do it, so let's please describe here how-to:
1. Linux
2. Mac os Leo
3. Windows
Gurus, please contribute!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sources are here :
http://developer.sonyericsson.com/cws/download/1/823/877/1278570405/X10_mini_Donut_100630.tar.gz
Rest can be done in same way as for "big" X10.
alx5962 said:
IMHO, the easiest way to make modules would be a virtualbox image already set up with arm gcc, kernel sources and X10 kernel config. It's a long process to set everything up; virtualbox makes this easier and cross platform.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have such virtual box image or whatever it is?
maxrfon said:
Do you have such virtual box image or whatever it is?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep but can't share it as everything is set up in french and I'm sure you'll not like this
anyway, i'm sure the owner of this thread will enjoy to create one.
alx5962 said:
yep but can't share it as everything is set up in french and I'm sure you'll not like this
anyway, i'm sure the owner of this thread will enjoy to create one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, french for me is a bit difficult
Ok i managed to make Ubuntu on my Parallels, just finished with the gcc. Let's see how it works.
Maybe i will share it.
kernel config is included in the /etc folder if I remember well, hope it's the same for the mini X10
It's actually in /proc
zdzihu said:
It's actually in /proc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi zdzihu,
I managed somehow install arm gcc on my Ubuntu. Now it's time for the tools.
So i would like to ask what config should i use arm v4? V5?
I am so tired with this linux things, but finally at least the demo busybox compiled well
So i tried to compile with arm-v5te config but for flash read (which is normaly working) it says
Code:
# ./dump_image system /sdcard/tt.bin
error reading system: Inappropriate ioctl for device
My task it not to run flash tools available, but my own, to compile all myself, to try to do the trick with the CPU to accept kernel, that i compiled.
Thanks.
The Snapdragon is armv7 compliant, so that should be your target.
ddewbofh said:
The Snapdragon is armv7 compliant, so that should be your target.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://jackytw.blogspot.com/2009/11/howto-run-native-linux-application-on.html
This tut i was using.
I can't find v7 .. Should i consider the V as the CPU ver?
Then its 1136 if i am not wrong?
maxrfon said:
http://jackytw.blogspot.com/2009/11/howto-run-native-linux-application-on.html
This tut i was using.
I can't find v7 .. Should i consider the V as the CPU ver?
Then its 1136 if i am not wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you using that tool to build the toolchain? In that case it might not have the option to build for that arch. The best way to make sure you get the correct one is to build it manually from scratch.
ddewbofh said:
Are you using that tool to build the toolchain? In that case it might not have the option to build for that arch. The best way to make sure you get the correct one is to build it manually from scratch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks like there is no other tut to build the toolchain. I searched days and nights to find something working.
I even compiled bysybox with it and it works on my x10!
But i found some sources of flash backup, called nandtools, compiled them well, no errors but the exec files are 4x bigger than the precompiled ones... And it makes the IOControl error..
the NDK won't compile, it requires Makefile or Android.mk and those are real headache to learn.
The Makefile from the archive is not compatible with NDK's make system and so on...
And so 2 weeks..
Pufff.. I am so tired if just linux things
Any hand?
Hi there, ARM is backward compatibile so compiled for v5 should run just fine. Problem must be somewhere else... I'm at work at the moment so I can't help much
By the way, there was some kind of dedicated flash tool posted already HERE, maybe you could check with jerpelea for re-upload?
zdzihu said:
Hi there, ARM is backward compatibile so compiled for v5 should run just fine. Problem must be somewhere else... I'm at work at the moment so I can't help much
By the way, there was some kind of dedicated flash tool posted already HERE, maybe you could check with jerpelea for re-upload?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You see, i need to compile mine, i have enough tools here already working, but my task is to compile my own and that's why i need a toolchain.
NDK is ok for the kernel, i compiled it already. But the native applications are not supported fully. Like write is deprecated and you can't use this function, and lot other limitations. So independent toolchain would help.
That's the point.
maxrfon said:
So independent toolchain would help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PM sent =)
It has been released on June the 26th!
It can be found at this url.
That information seems to be quite good.
From what I understand, binaries from NVidia contain 2.6.38 kernel with Tegra 2 drivers.
Does anyone here knows if this has any chance of working on Folio 100 ?
Could this kernel be usefull for HC releases ?
Thanks !
It cannot be used as is. Btw I'll give it a try just to experiment.
I downloaded also all the source code from nvidia and'ill try to compile it adding some drivers to handle the touchscreen.
Hey thanks roglio, that's a good source of information. I will give it a try as well, but probably not in these few weeks
Im very interested in using this. I dont have any experiance with making my own rom tho, so i have to go and try to find some recources on that first. If you guy's has a link for me ill be very gratefull
Sent from my Folio 100 using XDA Premium App
Moved to proper forum.
shidima_101 said:
If you guy's has a link for me ill be very gratefull
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nvm, after some proper reading on my part, it seems that there is a document there that will help you get it up and running...
After a quick read of the supplied doc's, it seems to me that this is more or less the same way to get linux working as was posted previously. They make an ubuntu disk image and flash a kernel and boot files to load the image from a sdcard. The only diffrence here is that you have "official" drivers for the board.
Yes, you're right and consider that is nvidia in person to release this material.
Maybe we will get ubuntu before honeycomb in the meantime that google release ice cream (with source code).
shidima_101 said:
After a quick read of the supplied doc's, it seems to me that this is more or less the same way to get linux working as was posted previously. They make an ubuntu disk image and flash a kernel and boot files to load the image from a sdcard. The only diffrence here is that you have "official" drivers for the board.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Atm I'm very busy at the damn work and I can't get the time to try. But be sure I'll spend each minute of the upcoming weekend to work on it!!!!
roglio said:
Yes, you're right and consider that is nvidia in person to release this material.
Maybe we will get ubuntu before honeycomb in the meantime that google release ice cream (with source code).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm more interested in getting arch up and running than ubuntu
xitrumch said:
I'm more interested in getting arch up and running than ubuntu
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To get arch running you need to get a file system image similar to the Ubuntu one that nVidia is suggesting. You also need a Arch arm kernel. If I don't forget ill try to look into it
[edit]
Ok, after a quick search I found an Arch arm site and on the forum they have a guide on installing on an ac100, that as far as i know is the folio 100 with a keyboard. (Right?)
http://archlinuxarm.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=1626&sid=72ac121c87b9c825454207acde727e67
[/edit]
I've tried porting several roms to my devices and every time I try to flash I always get status 0 or some type of error! I can't logcat from recovery because some things do not work completely with clockworkmod I have. I even manually tried porting the same method that android kitchen does and still run into the same problem. I have no idea what I should try next? This is really making me made. I get no help at all after searching and searching every where!
android kitchen
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=633246
all in one guide
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1273718
And some other methods and still no luck!!
You are right. There is no guide. It's trial and error. Logcat helps and if you know what certain files do that helps too.
It's simple:
grab the sources from github, add your device and vendor folder, add the device to the list in the mk files, lunch, and build.
openetna is a repository with many bugfixes, as you will have them.
Easy ****!
mDroidd said:
It's simple:
grab the sources from github, add your device and vendor folder, add the device to the list in the mk files, lunch, and build.
openetna is a repository with many bugfixes, as you will have them.
Easy ****!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats great if building from source
but i think he is talking about porting roms that are not AOSP.
The problem with a porting tutorial is that all devices and roms are a bit different so there will never will be a tutorial to get this done 100%. They are great guides to give you a start but it can take a lot more to get things ported.
if the device architecture is similar
Ex... Evo 4g to Incredible
than porting is fairly easy
being able to logcat is very necessary when porting roms
getting that working is your first step.
I always gave up on porting just because i dont have the patients to do it.
Exactly. I've ported several roms from the E3D and Sensation to the Rezound, and they are easy because the processor is the same. All you really need to get it booting is the kernel in most cases.
mDroidd said:
It's simple:
grab the sources from github, add your device and vendor folder, add the device to the list in the mk files, lunch, and build.
openetna is a repository with many bugfixes, as you will have them.
Easy ****!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not that simple if you have to make a device tree from scratch like I'm doing
I've a question!!
I have an HTC Explorer (based on Qualcomm MSM7227) and I'd like to build a rom (AOSP or Cyano)...
I've downloaded Kernel Source Code but after hours of researches I haven't found a guide for merge a rom with a kernel..
can you help me?
thank you!
Can we port a rom from HTC desire to Motorola defy....is it easy??
HIT THANKS IF IVE HELPED
extremists said:
Can we port a rom from HTC desire to Motorola defy....is it easy??
HIT THANKS IF IVE HELPED
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's about as hard as it gets.
Unless building from source its not as difficult.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
wes342 said:
That's about as hard as it gets.
Unless building from source its not as difficult.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do u know how to port??
HIT THANKS IF IVE HELPED
The thing is there's also no real guide on how to make your own public repo for devices who don't have one .
E.g. Galaxy R
Herpderp Defy.
So I found out how to build from cm7 sources and it is a no go... I do not know how in the world you guys can port any roms. How do you get your files up on git hub any way? There is more to it then just compiling from cm sources..
Here's a slightly outdated one
EmoBoiix3 said:
The thing is there's also no real guide on how to make your own public repo for devices who don't have one .
E.g. Galaxy R
Herpderp Defy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just so its clear... this (slightly outdated) guide would be (the best I've found) for building a device tree (that you may elect to throw up on github) that can be used to build AOSP.. the same device tree probably could build CyanogenMod or MIUI fairly easily (minimal editing) but you are correct... no exact guide bc its not an exact science (lots of different devices out there with lots of different device configurations; even kernels different some are ti omap, some are qualcomm msm, etc.). Basically you build a tree to define your hardware.. AOSP, CM or MIUI will build themselves based on this definition (device) tree.
http://www.kandroid.org/online-pdk/guide/build_new_device.html
Now after you follow this guide, google the various build errors you get (one at a time) and perfect your tree until you get basic bring up... then perfect it some more until you get all your modules working (will take some aosp kernel cooking as well)... then perfect it some more... in a few months you should have something pretty decent (and learn tree building a bit more; we all learn by doing ) Best advice I have for you; going through the same thing myself.
Also wouldn't be a bad idea to download Hardware Info apk (Sleek Apps) and email yourself the info it spits out. That way you at least have a list of some of the hardware you are trying to define.
Rob
mDroidd said:
It's simple:
grab the sources from github, add your device and vendor folder, add the device to the list in the mk files, lunch, and build.
openetna is a repository with many bugfixes, as you will have them.
Easy ****!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How exactly do you do this? How do you build it completely specifically for your device?
Sorry, I'm a complete noob on building from scratch and Linux. Could anyone shed some some light?
Thanks you guys
Hi,
Just wondering if/when MadCatz will release the kernel?
I know linux being GPL, it has to be shared, but not sure about Nvidia's sources?
I'm new to android but not java(my day job) and linux.
I've compiled and installed my own kernels on desktop and on my mobile phone (Nokia N900).
I want to try and add a few things.. ie filesystem/DVB/webcam support etc.
Following this how to.
Apologies for the delay in getting this released. Here's the kernel source:
ftp://86.54.116.234/pub/software/mojo/firmware/mojo-jb-kernel.tar.gz
Mad Catz Rich said:
Apologies for the delay in getting this released. Here's the kernel source:
ftp://86.54.116.234/pub/software/mojo/firmware/mojo-jb-kernel.tar.gz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sweet! many thanks :victory:
:highfive:
:good:
omg.... does this mean we can finally have a cifs module!? AWESOME!
So now that the kernel source is avialable, I'm looking forward to the first custom kernels. Would be great to have some kernel optimizations and other tweaks built in :good:
RollingRoman said:
So now that the kernel source is avialable, I'm looking forward to the first custom kernels. Would be great to have some kernel optimizations and other tweaks built in :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes i hope someone can make a kernel to re-apply resolution settings on the m.o.j.o, as mad catz said to me via a phone call some tv's can't adjust to 1080p natively because the os is preventing it,and stupidly they removed the resolution changing slider in settings don't ask me why they did that?
If there is a way to set resolution without endangering the console booting up afterwards would be awesome,i am thinking it is there but hidden away and accessable some way but don't know how,developer options can be opened but not resolution settings as far as i have found any way.
PHYSC-1 said:
Yes i hope someone can make a kernel to re-apply resolution settings on the m.o.j.o, as mad catz said to me via a phone call some tv's can't adjust to 1080p natively because the os is preventing it,and stupidly they removed the resolution changing slider in settings don't ask me why they did that?
If there is a way to set resolution without endangering the console booting up afterwards would be awesome,i am thinking it is there but hidden away and accessable some way but don't know how,developer options can be opened but not resolution settings as far as i have found any way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it automatically sets the resolution based on the TV/monitor, try a different one?
TMK, the slider has nothing to do with the kernel.
gwaldo said:
I think it automatically sets the resolution based on the TV/monitor, try a different one?
TMK, the slider has nothing to do with the kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would do that but i only have a panasonic 50" plasma it's a 600hz 1080p it p50x50b model,there are 2 variants of it a hd ready and a 1080p model,i know it's the 1080p model as i used blu ray and xbox 360 and a wiiu etc in 1080p modes so it's definately not 720p only on my model.
I still think it is possible to reinstate that hdmi resolution slider though? I would love for someone to find a fix for that to bring back the slider though.
It also has nothing to do with the overscan as that's off,and the guy said it's an argument between the console's os and the tv,but maybe if i had an option to change resolution within the console when in operation it would ammend this,resolution changer pro works then looses usability eventually and it's awkward and time consuming to get that to work,only for it to stop after a time?
There is no forced hdmi resolution setting in the tv menu unless of course there is in engineer mode but all that seems to do when entered is show test and it's results coming up as ok,after testing it factory resets the tv as well so sick of trying that now.
Someone needs to get a custom rom made up with kitkat and 1080p natively set.
Mad Catz Rich said:
Apologies for the delay in getting this released. Here's the kernel source:
ftp://86.54.116.234/pub/software/mojo/firmware/mojo-jb-kernel.tar.gz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unable to untar the tar.gz file. It says "tar: kernel/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43341/src/include/proto/p2p.h: Cannot open: Not a directory" and there are many lines like this. Tried everything from sudo, sudo -s, chmod, chown....
Also it says cannot mkdir: is not a directory
Its a .h and .c files ofcourse they aren't directories! Its not letting me execute make without errors since my source is like crap crawling with this "NOT A DIRECTORY"
Nothing is working. Command used was tar xvfz mojo-jb-kernel.tar.gz with many combinations and OS is Ubuntu 12.04 LTS 64 bit...
Mad Catz Rich said:
Apologies for the delay in getting this released. Here's the kernel source:
ftp://86.54.116.234/pub/software/mojo/firmware/mojo-jb-kernel.tar.gz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you help me. Is there any other place from where I can get source?
Thanks in advance..
Kingshoo said:
Can you help me. Is there any other place from where I can get source?
Thanks in advance..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey,
I suggest downloading with wget or a good download/ftp application if it's timeout on you.
It's not corrupted, it worked for me and the date stamp is still the same.
gwaldo said:
Hey,
I suggest downloading with wget or a good download/ftp application if it's timeout on you.
It's not corrupted, it worked for me and the date stamp is still the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't time out but it says some .c and .h cannot open: Not a directory when I use tar to extract it. Then I thought that I should install something else to extract and tried ARC. It extracted and then the same message box as appeared in windows 7 OS "file already exists cancel or overwrite"
I then said overwrite and then I get the extracted package. I just want to ask you that when you extracted it did you got any errors? What procedure you used to extract it? I downloaded twice with same results...
gwaldo said:
Hey,
I suggest downloading with wget or a good download/ftp application if it's timeout on you.
It's not corrupted, it worked for me and the date stamp is still the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK as per your suggestion I used wget c and the address. That gave me again the same file and upon extracting it I am getting same errors.
May be that the file isn't corrupted as you can extract it and its possible that I am doing something wrong in extraction..
I tried to create the kernel from sources and got a make error, to remove that I must delete a line in the make file (Line no 603) and after that I can successfully compile the zimage. But the issue is that after completing the procedure for boot.img file the original and compiled one has a difference of 0.1 MB and device don't boot with the newly compiled boot.img
Please if you can provide me with the steps on how you exctracted it and which OS you are using?then it will be really helpful. Also can you please upload the makefile of kernel and config.gz file you are using to make the kernel...
One useful information that can prove that there is an issue in extraction:
Extracted content on windows OS with Administrator priviledges: 42889 items , 487.8 MB
Extracted content on Ubuntu with Tar and other utilities: 42692 items, 482.5 MB
gwaldo said:
Hey,
I suggest downloading with wget or a good download/ftp application if it's timeout on you.
It's not corrupted, it worked for me and the date stamp is still the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems like you are the only person who can help me as no one else seems to be active on MOJO development department. Sorry to disturb you again friend but you know I tried extracting on Android too and it failed there too!
I am completely exhaused with two days 24hrs of searching only extraction process. Please let me know if you successfully compiled and booted the kernel on your MOJO. If yes then I need more information from you as I had compiled the kernel but as I told you earlier it didn't worked... Please reply ASAP
Kingshoo said:
Seems like you are the only person who can help me as no one else seems to be active on MOJO development department. Sorry to disturb you again friend but you know I tried extracting on Android too and it failed there too!
I am completely exhaused with two days 24hrs of searching only extraction process. Please let me know if you successfully compiled and booted the kernel on your MOJO. If yes then I need more information from you as I had compiled the kernel but as I told you earlier it didn't worked... Please reply ASAP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
I'm in Aust. so there's a time difference.
I'm also about to leave on a 4week holiday and don't have my mojo dev stuff on my laptop.
I just used tar -vxzf filename
I think the only errors were a bad lsymbolic links which arent required.. from memory I could be wrong.
If you read the other threads here, I and someone else explain how we got the kernel compiled and yes it works fine.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2691985&page=2
You dont use their makefile you recreate it .
If this is your first linux kernel or even android kernel, it's a tricky process and it takes time research all the steps.
Good luck
gwaldo said:
Hi,
I'm in Aust. so there's a time difference.
I'm also about to leave on a 4week holiday and don't have my mojo dev stuff on my laptop.
I just used tar -vxzf filename
I think the only errors were a bad lsymbolic links which arent required.. from memory I could be wrong.
If you read the other threads here, I and someone else explain how we got the kernel compiled and yes it works fine.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2691985&page=2
You dont use their makefile you recreate it .
If this is your first linux kernel or even android kernel, it's a tricky process and it takes time research all the steps.
Good luck
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have gone through with the links you provided already and I understand every bit of conversation. Yes I am new to kernel compiling but its reasonably understandable.
I respect your valuable answer no matter when you reply since you have a minute for me and don't worry about TimeZone differences as I am not in a great hurry, I just don't wish to waste time on errors for which I ain't responsible
OK I tried compiling modules for which I had to compile the kernel to get the module.symvar file and "THE MODULES WORK!" that too with the Default kernel Makefile and ofcourse my own module Makefile.
"You dont use their makefile you recreate it" this line you wrote.. What do you mean by that??
I mean were you talking about the kernel Makefile or our own module Makefile, Please clear me here? As far as I know the Kernel Makefile should be the same when only compiling the stock kernel as that is my purpose "JUST TO COMPILE THE STOCK KERNEL"...
My compiled kernel boots but just shows a black screen! I don't want to spoil your holidays sincerely but if some help I can get from you then I will be able to relieve me from this burden
Hmm got it compiled finally even after that make issue with -k flag to make
Also all I needed was ramdisk from latest OTA and not the one from the kernel. That was the issue with kernel booting but it freezing at blank screen...
RESOLVED :highfive:
Kingshoo said:
Hmm got it compiled finally even after that make issue with -k flag to make
Also all I needed was ramdisk from latest OTA and not the one from the kernel. That was the issue with kernel booting but it freezing at blank screen...
RESOLVED :highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Glad you got it working.
Re the makefile, I think you have to run config first to check your systems compilers/linkers/etc which then creates the makefile.
:highfive:
Mad Catz Rich said:
Apologies for the delay in getting this released. Here's the kernel source:
ftp://86.54.116.234/pub/software/mojo/firmware/mojo-jb-kernel.tar.gz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is there any reason this is done via some random ftp server and not some place like github/bitbucket with better management? or heck even sourceforge would be an improvement.
is that account for developer outreach? are there any datasheets on the components used in the device? sony does a beta program for updates on their flagship devices have you considered doing something similar where people can grab images and help test updates? ever think about tossing the device trees up for aosp to help encourage a porting of 3rd party roms and spread the community?
the nook color and touchpad being hack and having Cyanogenmod and the like being ported to it drove sales up, i would imagine having a hackable android console that isnt some no name chinese brand would probably do decent. unfortunately now with android tv you guys have some serious competition on the horizon, its a matter of how you go from here and try to make the most of it so everyone already has your product and doesnt need another.
edit: i also see there is several updates yet only one kernel source... any chance of updated source?
@Mad Catz Rich
The new update (205-TS) has a new kernel build of May 2nd.
Any chance that can be put on the server?
from http://madcatz.com/mojo/en-ca/
Ready to Root
As any Android power-user knows, the best way to get the most out of your device is to root it. Root access opens up all sorts of options including adding custom keymapping capabilities and installing custom ROMs. Mad Catz provides a short step-by-step guide to rooting, and our tech support team is ready to help.
The best part – rooting won’t void your warranty.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please help, tech support team!
We need custom ROMs!
make kernelversion
3.4.35
Hello guys. Found this guide for kernel reverse-engineering via IDA pro. I have done several steps, but can`t separate the image itself from the extractor in the zImage file. Should i even continue, or the idea is useless? Is it`s useful, you can download and try to unpack the zimage by yourself, and i also have the symbols for a script.
[email protected] said:
Hello guys. Found this guide for kernel reverse-engineering via IDA pro. I have done several steps, but can`t separate the image itself from the extractor in the zImage file. Should i even continue, or the idea is useless? Is it`s useful, you can download and try to unpack the zimage by yourself, and i also have the symbols for a script.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw your post about this in another thread, and I did not want to discourage you, so I kept quiet. But, since you now ask directly, I will advise you to not waste your time. Even with full source code, kernel hacking is not for the faint-hearted, and is far from a trivial exercise. With no source code (or with incomplete source code), you might as well want to try getting hedgehogs to fly to Mars ...
Hi there! First, I'm no dev (got some experience about building Roms/Kernel from source) so sorry if I ask noobish things .
I got the same problem with the mi4s zimage (want to reverse engineer because official kernel sources are incomplete..) couldn't I just extract everything out of boot partition and create the source-code out of that? or what's the Problem by doing this? If the extracted source code (for whatever reason) is incomplete, wouldn't it be possible to get the missing things from official source released by xiaomi?
Thanks in advance
wertus33333 said:
...couldn't I just extract everything out of boot partition and create the source-code out of that? or what's the Problem by doing this? If the extracted source code (for whatever reason) is incomplete, wouldn't it be possible to get the missing things from official source released by xiaomi?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You want to extract compilable linux kernel source code from a compiled kernel? Sorry to disappoint you - but human beings will learn to climb a rope from Europe to the moon before you could achieve it. You might be able to disassemble the kernel, but you would not get anything near something compilable.
Hint: if it could readily be done, do you not think someone in these and other forums would have done it already?
DarthJabba9 said:
You want to extract compilable linux kernel source code from a compiled kernel? Sorry to disappoint you - but human beings will learn to climb a rope from Europe to the moon before you could achieve it. You might be able to disassemble the kernel, but you would not get anything near something compilable.
Hint: if it could readily be done, do you not think someone in these and other forums would have done it already?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are lots of people who already did this! (see xiaomi forums redmi 3s, mi pad, Samsung galaxy s3, i9000/9001 etc. etc.). And those kernel are indeed working (even better than the ones from source) (yes, I tried it).
U ask why no one already did this? maybe because Mi4s community is very small (not even our own section..) and its quite a new device.
So why is it possible with other phones but not with mi4s?
Ty for help and explanation
Btw, can u explain it technically? not like "humans will learn to breathe in space before"....
wertus33333 said:
There are lots of people who already did this! (see xiaomi forums redmi 3s, mi pad, Samsung galaxy s3, i9000/9001 etc. etc.). And those kernel are indeed working (even better than the ones from source) (yes, I tried it).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you mean that somebody patched a binary kernel, yes, that can be done, and I have done it myself. If you mean that somebody disassembled a binary kernel into compilable source code, I very much doubt that. If you claim that others have done it, why not post a link to the source code that they extracted, so that we too can try our hands at compiling it?
wertus33333 said:
U ask why no one already did this? maybe because Mi4s community is very small (not even our own section..) and its quite a new device.
So why is it possible with other phones but not with mi4s?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am totally unconvinced about the claim that "it is possible with other phones". Please show the evidence.
wertus33333 said:
Ty for help and explanation
Btw, can u explain it technically? not like "humans will learn to breathe in space before"....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A simple example - http://blog.packagecloud.io/eng/201...-and-disassmble-a-linux-kernel-image-vmlinuz/
Scroll to the bottom of the page and see what you will get for your efforts. Try compiling that. Better still, try editing it to add missing things or fix/remove broken things, and then compiling it. Finally, you are talking about 15 million lines of source code. Good luck.
for example here: http://en.miui.com/thread-125557-1-1.html
http://forum.xda-developers.com/android/software-hacking/how-to-reverse-engineer-kernel-t3137384
Maybe we're talking about different matters, I just want to implement UV and OC in the original xiaomi kernel to use it with smiui... As you seem to know a lot about linux kernels, how can this be done?
Greetz
wertus33333 said:
for example here: http://en.miui.com/thread-125557-1-1.html
http://forum.xda-developers.com/android/software-hacking/how-to-reverse-engineer-kernel-t3137384
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These are the bases of your claim that it can be done? I cannot see anywhere in those two threads where anybody was able to do anything useful with what was being proposed.
wertus33333 said:
Maybe we're talking about different matters, I just want to implement UV and OC in the original xiaomi kernel to use it with smiui... As you seem to know a lot about linux kernels, how can this be done?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know how to compile linux kernels when the full source code exists. I also know how to patch such sources to edit/add/remove specific things. I also know how to patch an uncompressed binary kernel if I know exactly which offset(s) to patch and which values to substitute for what is already there. I have done this for 32-bit RK3188 android kernels in my old tablets (search the ARCTABLET forums and you might see some of my historic work on overclocking RK3188 binary kernels). This was easier for RK kernels than for MTK, and much can go wrong. If all is that is needed for what you want to do is to change specific values at specific offsets, then all you need is a hex editor and the necessary information about offsets/values. If you are trying to add a new feature, then you need the full source code from the vendor.
Get yourself a backup phone before trying anything of the sort. Like I said before, I wish you good luck!
Thank you for that information. Wouldn't it be possible to edit the things in zimage (unpacked) and then just re-pack it and use it? There shouldn't be anything missing if I'm able to find the correct offset for the lzo compressor...
wertus33333 said:
Thank you for that information. Wouldn't it be possible to edit the things in zimage (unpacked) and then just re-pack it and use it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is a binary file, which of course you can edit with a hex editor. But what exactly are you proposing to edit in it?
Isn't it an image containing files from Kernel? Otherwise they wouldn't talk about extracting it... Yes, I need to edit it with a hex-editor to remove the lzo header (zimage is a self extracting archive, but i want to extract it with normal zip extractor) but cant find where the header starts.
wertus33333 said:
Isn't it an image containing files from Kernel? Otherwise they wouldn't talk about extracting it... Yes, I need to edit it with a hex-editor to remove the lzo header (zimage is a self extracting archive, but i want to extract it with normal zip extractor) but cant find where the header starts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your questions show a misunderstanding of what a kernel is. The best I can do is to refer you to Android kernel development information - see e.g.,
http://www.99droid.com/android-kernel-development-tutorial-let-the-development-begin/
http://source.android.com/source/index.html
http://source.android.com/source/building-kernels.html
At this point, I bow out of this discussion.