Hi, time ago i got 2200 on quadrant score with cyanogenmod. Now i can max get 1950. Why???
LoKKeR said:
Hi, time ago i got 2200 on quadrant score with cyanogenmod. Now i can max get 1950. Why???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not a big deal..Quadrants are a piece of ****..They never give an accurate reading
Maiby overclock have ruined the cpu? It's possible? I don't use anymore it from a lot of time.
Ah, last score i got was 2000. The scores vary according to the governor system i set. What's the best governor for big games or generally for games?
If your using your rom that's why. The miui stuff slows it down incredibly. But miui isn't about speed.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
jusada said:
If your using your rom that's why. The miui stuff slows it down incredibly. But miui isn't about speed.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nono i get this score with all roms.
A user of xda with my rom have got up to 2000 on quadrant score.
Mmmm... I'll try Cyanogenmod-7.1-KANG. I remember that is one of the best rom i have tryed.
LoKKeR said:
Maiby overclock have ruined the cpu? It's possible? I don't use anymore it from a lot of time.
Ah, last score i got was 2000. The scores vary according to the governor system i set. What's the best governor for big games or generally for games?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, overclocking MOST DEFINITELY fault your processor in some way.
And the Prawsome is right: Quadrant scores don't mean anything at all. 0% reliable. You know what the best benchmark is? Your experience
Oh, and the best governor for gaming would be performance.
This post was sent from hell.
Related
I flashed 1.2.2 rom first than I flashed bcblend kernel. Rebooted everything seems to work fine except I do a quadrant benchmark test and im getting low scores. When I go in set cpu and oc to 1.7 max .8 min i get high benchmark scores like I had with stock kernel. Anybody know whats happening? I unocked htcdev method. Hboot 1.5 with s-on
Are these low benchmark scores reflecting actual performance? If not, then don't care too much about it.
Are you using SetCPU, or a daemon?
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
DDiaz007 said:
Are these low benchmark scores reflecting actual performance? If not, then don't care too much about it.
Are you using SetCPU, or a daemon?
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using setcpu. No performance is superfast...It's like my phone smoked crystal meth, no matter what I set the CPU speed to. Regardless I'm getting low bench scores. But I'm gonna take your advice and not care about it. I was just wondering if that was normal for a custom ROM and kernel combo.
Jabawockee said:
I'm using setcpu. No performance is superfast...It's like my phone smoked crystal meth, no matter what I set the CPU speed to. Regardless I'm getting low bench scores. But I'm gonna take your advice and not care about it. I was just wondering if that was normal for a custom ROM and kernel combo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try setting the min freq as the same as max. Then select the performance governor, and run a bench. See what that does.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
DDiaz007 said:
Try setting the min freq as the same as max. Then select the performance governor, and run a bench. See what that does.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, I set it at 1.6 ghz min and max on demand. Then I ran the antutu bench test. My score barely passed the galaxy s2. Is that normal? Performance wise its real fast though so i dunno if I should be concerned???
Jabawockee said:
Performance wise its real fast though so i dunno if I should be concerned???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely no need for concern. Benchmark scores are terribly overrated. if the phone feels fast, then ride with it.
Hey guys I just started overclocking my ace and i must say i am seeing a difference in performance. Now a bit more details:
ROM: Stocklite V6
Using No Frills CPU Control (which came with the ROM)
So far my settings for the highest clock is:
MAX clock freq: 864mhz
Governor: performance
I/O sch: deadline
Should I keep pushing for a higher clock speed or is that good enough, and what are the signs of an unstable OC, i've been playing angry birds after each OC, also going on the market and downloading stuff, is that enough or should I run something else?
I know the minimum clock speed recommended for the ace is 245mhz, right now i'm just trying to get the highest clock speed, when I attain the highest clock speed, which governor would you guys recommend, on demand or smartass?
Try smartass v2
Use zimage which has multi overclock option
And keep min 245
And Max 902
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Thanks man, i'll give it a go now and report back.
HUMM...just tried 883mhz and within 2mins of playing angry birds the phone rebooted...i guess I will have to live with 864mhz...but still it's a good OC, everything feels much more.....crisp
Study about the CPU governors before you start using them. Performance governor uses the MAX CPU clock @ ALL THE TIME, Uses the hell of a battery. & SGA is meant to be working on 800 max at all the time, it was running 864 continuously. No wonder why your phone rebooted. Continuous OCs will hamper your phone life.
amd-dude said:
HUMM...just tried 883mhz and within 2mins of playing angry birds the phone rebooted...i guess I will have to live with 864mhz...but still it's a good OC, everything feels much more.....crisp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea well,but dont get into the habit of overclocking it every time or.......you will suffer the same thing i am suffering now
Prawesome said:
Yea well,but dont get into the habit of overclocking it every time or.......you will suffer the same thing i am suffering now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you suffering from?
shailpancholi said:
Try smartass v2
Use zimage which has multi overclock option
And keep min 245
And Max 902
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Zimage max is 800..
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA
syed.sayeed96 said:
Zimage max is 800..
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya by he should hv better kernal like the one with 902mhz
Its awesome and then use zimage then yummy will ft option
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-4
shailpancholi said:
Ya by he should hv better kernal like the one with 902mhz
Its awesome and then use zimage then yummy will ft option
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please, please, PLEASE. Don't use that gibberish writing style. Use normal english, as we all try to do (I think a very few of xda users speak english as a native language, as well).
Jar3112 said:
Please, please, PLEASE. Don't use that gibberish writing style. Use normal english, as we all try to do (I think a very few of xda users speak english as a native language, as well).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i can say that u speak for all of us. and u can read minds!
I'm not going to leave the governor on performance, I was just using it to let the phone run all out while OC'ing, I have enabled the Smartass V2 governor now and all is good. Now i'm finding the lowest clock speed where everything still moves smoothly. So far 320mhz is pretty decent..jittery but decent.
guys, which kernel i can use for a good overclock? I am using zImage-Mod v1.5 more i can´t overclock with this..
leo4b said:
guys, which kernel i can use for a good overclock? I am using zImage-Mod v1.5 more i can´t overclock with this..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ketuts OLD one... i could do 960 with that..
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA
Prawesome said:
Yea well,but dont get into the habit of overclocking it every time or.......you will suffer the same thing i am suffering now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what u suffering???
mine since last 3 month until now 24h oc..320 min 902 max using ketut kernel..
please share what u suffering...
If i OC mine beyond 844 MHz my phone restarts
Dont think that if one person gets 902 or 920, that you will be able to as well
test each stage carefully. IMHO OC isnt worth it (im happy with max 800)
So I got Samsung stock Rom I don't remember exactly and when I ran quadrant benchmark I got score like 6k the most of the score was the I/o
But now I installed check sum hd v4 and syhan kernel now my cpu score is high but the I/o is low
You forgot the question? Which is?
niba10 said:
So I got Samsung stock Rom I don't remember exactly and when I ran quadrant benchmark I got score like 6k the most of the score was the I/o
But now I installed check sum hd v4 and syhan kernel now my cpu score is high but the I/o is low
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quadrant scores are nothing, they are obsolete. as long as you have smooth ui and bug free you are good to use it
After I installed evo check sum hd v4 the ui is much faster and more smooth battery is more good
But I'm just wondering why after I installed the custom Rom the I/o is low
niba10 said:
After I installed evo check sum hd v4 the ui is much faster and more smooth battery is more good
But I'm just wondering why after I installed the custom Rom the I/o is low
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it has more to do with a kernel than Rom itself
I got syahn kernel 1.5beta6 it's good?
niba10 said:
I got syahn kernel 1.5beta6 it's good?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So is beer .
jje
JJEgan said:
So is beer .
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean ???
niba10 said:
I got syahn kernel 1.5beta6 it's good?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just try it. I am using it and battery life never been greater
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
does the benchmark score very important for you ?
XeactorZ said:
does the benchmark score very important for you ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes?
They score my device I should care of it ??
The thing to remember about benchmarks is that while they "test" performance in various categories all they are really doing are arbitrary calculations testing how well your device performs running that specific benchmark software. Extrapolating these scores to real world performance is often quite useless and inaccurate. Don't place too much stock on benchmark scores and just feel for yourself if certain roms/kernels feel laggier or faster.
Sent from my tricked out AOKP GT-I9300
Add to the post above that Quadrant is useless .
Benchmarks vary from one run to another .
One of 9000 followed by one of 12200 is a non reliable benchmarking tool .
jje
Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Is Geekbench an accepted Benchmark? How accurate is it? The scores seem to be all over the place with the Nexus 7 with the crappy tegra 3 beating the GS3 in one test while the GS3 beating it in another. Don't really trust it if the results change on the fly like that. haha
irzero said:
Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For what it's worth here:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032744
It was set at 1704mhz
Here is 1600mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032776
For gits and shiggles here is 1400mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032818
To compare clock for clock I set to 1000mhz, but left at quad core...though not sure it that actually matters...
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032862
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
2081 you got on 1.7ghz, running ics..
My name is Optimus Prime and I send this message..
irzero said:
Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I posted some scores on Beyond3D:
Nebuchadnezzar said:
I'm getting 1854, 1574, 1292 respectively for 4, 3 and 2 cores. So the final score doesn't seem to scale that well with cores, which is obvious consindering there's single-core performance tests.
Here's the Exynos [email protected] 1Ghz with only 2 cores for a clock-for-clock comparison;
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/1032330/1030202
And here's @ stock 1.4Ghz with 4 cores, frequency locked:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/1032351/1030202
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The A6 clearly and undisputedly has the upper hand here. The score may be lower but we're talking about vast IPC and frequency disparities here. The Cortex's are getting slaughtered in memory bandwidth.
And here's a 1704MHz bench for the hell for it: 2283 score.
Would be interesting if somebody with a Krait phone would run it at 1GHz and stock frequency respectively.
I hit 1800 at stock on Jelly bean Omega rom V26.
I might try and clock this phone and see what happens
What a junk benchmark.. kept running It till I got this.. my lowest was 1520..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Wanam Lite Stock stock LI1 blows the iphone away, I get 1780.
NOTE: My S3 is not OC'd, this was at the default 1400mhz with stock kernel (3.0.31-111170 [email protected] #1
Tomatoes8 said:
Is Geekbench an accepted Benchmark? How accurate is it? The scores seem to be all over the place with the Nexus 7 with the crappy tegra 3 beating the GS3 in one test while the GS3 beating it in another. Don't really trust it if the results change on the fly like that. haha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fade777 said:
What a junk benchmark.. kept running It till I got this.. my lowest was 1520..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any benchmark tool will be 'all over the place' depending on what is running in the background. Yes, you can turn off wireless, BT, data etc., but apps will still be launching and closing in the background which will affect the score. After all, these are supposed to be multitasking devices aren't they ?
Also, it's an inaccurate score if you actually go and forcibly disable system apps that would be running on a stock device, just to get a faster score.
Best way to use ANY benchmark tool is to get the device as near to stock as you can (consider a rom flash / data reset followed by very basic config) and then run the test a few times and take an average score. When I run benchmarks (Antutu, Quadrant, Geekbench), my results are often 'all over the place', so if I go with just one test, it would be luck of the draw really.
That said, my average score on S3 stock, rooted, unclocked in Geekbench 2.3.4 is 1586.
Funnily, when overclocked, the average was 1537
im on official (unofficial ) jellybean im updating to the latest leak now then i will come back with results that rape apple a6 cpu hard and in the arse
1830 at stock is my best so far without optimising anything other than a reboot.
The scores are higher on everything other than Memory Performance which is where Apple have beefed up the SoC.
How many points iphone5 do?
Enviado do meu GT-I9300
eric-filth said:
How many points iphone5 do?
Enviado do meu GT-I9300
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1601
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
This is my score... I use stock jb xxdli7...
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
This benchmark tests a combination of single and multi-threaded tasks. So obviously it will be all over the place when comparing an A9 quad-core phone to an A15 or Krait dual core phone. The phones also run differently clocked/speed memory, so tasks which are memory intensive would give a higher score to phones with faster memory.
I'm running Siyah kernel on Omega v26.1 and consistently get scores between 2000 and 2100. Only over-clocked to 1600MHz though.
siyah kernel + setcpu(performance,deadline,1704MHz)
Lucmuzz said:
I'm running Siyah kernel on Omega v26.1 and consistently get scores between 2000 and 2100. Only over-clocked to 1600MHz though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My score was almost identical with 1.6ghz on Omega 26.1
xtechx said:
For what it's worth here:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032744
It was set at 1704mhz
Here is 1600mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032776
For gits and shiggles here is 1400mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032818
To compare clock for clock I set to 1000mhz, but left at quad core...though not sure it that actually matters...
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032862
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gits and Shiggles! I like that one Gotta rember that!
Now to my answer: You just posted a useless thread and flamed about us members, now you want us to help you?
"How about you get a life?" Is what you said. Go ask someone else, or use the search engine by the same company that created Android "Google", ever heard of it? It's a really good site!
Let us know, what you have found..
familyguy59 said:
Gits and Shiggles! I like that one Gotta rember that!
Now to my answer: You just posted a useless thread and flamed about us members, now you want us to help you?
"How about you get a life?" Is what you said. Go ask someone else, or use the search engine by the same company that created Android "Google", ever heard of it? It's a really good site!
Let us know, what you have found..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What the f*ck are you talking about, you absolute schizo! :what:
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Hello all!
I hope some of you like numbers as much as I do. I thought I should run my handset through a series of benchmarks in order to see just what the dev community has unlocked within this device.
Here we go:
Overclocked to 1.72 GHZ - Governor: Performance
Cubed Kernel 1.2.5
Genome ROM v2
BenchmarkPi:
Average of 5 - 337.4 ms
Best of 5 - 224 ms
Linpack:
Average of 5 - 463.059 MFLOPS
Best of 5 - 510.427 MFLOPS
ANTUTU:
Average of 5 - 18396
Best of 5 - 19270
Vellamo:
HTML5 -- 1737
Metal -- 636
Quadrant:
Average of 3 - 8131
Best of 3 - 8364
These results put the Droid DNA well ahead of pretty much all competition for the next few months. I imagine things will get even better once AOSP Roms make their way to this amazing device.
So - does anyone with a higher overclock have any stats? I would be interested in seeing how well this processor scales.
That quadrant seems low. I've gotten 8254 stock unrooted.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
sent from my beastly powered DNA using Tapatalk 2
DSB's Cubed v 1.2.5
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
getting there...
DSB and UKB's latest
System Tuner Pro to take it up a notch or two
How did you get 9608 I got 8660 on quadrant with 1.83 gh cubed latest
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Ndaoud360 said:
How did you get 9608 I got 8660 on quadrant with 1.83 gh cubed latest
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The benchmarks usually don't turn on all the cores. At least that's what I think because I turn all my cores on and all on the performance governor and I get around the 9500's at 1.83Ghz.
I've received over 9k quadrant and 500+ linpack with 1.5ghz. Strangely, powersave gave me better scores than performance (stock kernel)
On cubed kernel 1.5ghz performance = 587
http://imgur.com/u4N5w
Whats the next step in mobile processing? How fast or powerful can they be?
iOSh8er said:
DSB's Cubed v 1.2.5
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
23345 cpu! Holy fruck!
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
I love this phone
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium
I managed to break the mystical 10k marker on quadrant.
I've been more of a lurker, until now.
Anyway, this is with cores set at 1890x4, performance governor setting. Running senseless ROM.
I'd like to thank everyone on XDA for their work on android.
neatojones said:
I managed to break the mystical 10k marker on quadrant.
I've been more of a lurker, until now.
Anyway, this is with cores set at 1890x4, performance governor setting. Running senseless ROM.
I'd like to thank everyone on XDA for their work on android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By the way, while my phone is stable on these settings it drains my battery too fast to be usable. I leave the cores set to 1890, but as long as I don't have the setting on "performance" I actually see decent battery life. My quadrant drops into the upper 9k's though without the governor set to performance.
neatojones said:
I managed to break the mystical 10k marker on quadrant.
I've been more of a lurker, until now.
Anyway, this is with cores set at 1890x4, performance governor setting. Running senseless ROM.
I'd like to thank everyone on XDA for their work on android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are the chosen one my friend. No, but really... dayyuummmnnn!
neatojones said:
I managed to break the mystical 10k marker on quadrant.
I've been more of a lurker, until now.
Anyway, this is with cores set at 1890x4, performance governor setting. Running senseless ROM.
I'd like to thank everyone on XDA for their work on android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers for breaking 10k but why is your I/O score so low? (I've got 15k+ on the Note 2) Also was expecting the 3D score to be a lot higher on the DNA, kernel doesn't have support for GPU OC? IMO with those CPU / MEM and tweaking 11000-11500 should easily come
tbukkos said:
Cheers for breaking 10k but why is your I/O score so low? (I've got 15k+ on the Note 2) Also was expecting the 3D score to be a lot higher on the DNA, kernel doesn't have support for GPU OC? IMO with those CPU / MEM and tweaking 11000-11500 should easily come
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True. I could probably have a done a little more tweaking on the I/O score. The kernel used for this does support GPU OC, but I haven't found a tool that I feel comfortable using to OC the GPU yet. That and probably more realistically: I moved on to conquering other things once I managed the 10k score that was my goal.