Does anyone know if the HC Kernel source for the HTC Evo View has been released yet? I checked on HTCDEV.com and they have a kernel source but it doesn say HC?
Wrong thread
Sent from my PG41200 using xda premium
wyldkard said:
Wrong thread
Sent from my PG41200 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is this the wrong thread? This is for android development is it not?
what you are asking is a question. This is development only. Now if you were to post a link to this "source code" and change the name of this topic to htc view HC kernel development and start a conversation out by saying "Here is the source code to the HC kernel for the View" then THAT would be acceptable in this forum ;-) just saying....
Now I'd probably change or do something before you get flamed by a whoooole lot of people lol
kevinrocksman said:
what you are asking is a question. This is development only. Now if you were to post a link to this "source code" and change the name of this topic to htc view HC kernel development and start a conversation out by saying "Here is the source code to the HC kernel for the View" then THAT would be acceptable in this forum ;-) just saying....
Now I'd probably change or do something before you get flamed by a whoooole lot of people lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Edit
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Its worth rooting just for v6 supercharger. That script is pretty incredible. To OP: this forum is for releasing goods only, everything else goes into general.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
I am working on a HC kernel right now. doesn't mean its going to work.
Related
Just curious what peoples takes were on the the current froyo Roms, differences seem minor, is it worth flashing around? Hows does this work as they are similar in nature without everyone being p.o.ed?
Sent from my FroyoEris using XDA App
I could be wrong here but this is probably a topic best suited for the General Discussion sub forum.
Who really cares where it goes the forum moderator can move it if need b the topic has better "advertising " here
Sent from my FroyoEris using XDA App
xnatex21 said:
I could be wrong here but this is probably a topic best suited for the General Discussion sub forum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup in fact there is already a topic about it-http://ip208-100-42-21.static.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=728873
In all honesty development is the only place I go I'm sure that has to go for a few others as well
Sent from my FroyoEris using XDA App
whojabacod said:
Who really cares where it goes the forum moderator can move it if need b the topic has better "advertising " here
Sent from my FroyoEris using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We care. We dont need junk like this clogging up the Development section.
I think the best way to deal with this is to simply answer the question:
They are based on the froyo source code and are built from that point on by different people in different place.
I'm on celb froyo and so far have not ran into any issues, haven't tried the others yet and may not if this keeps running as it is now
Sent from my froyo ERIS using XDA App
3? I can only think of 2
Oh nevermind
Wow. What arrogance displayed by some members.
I find that KaosFroYo works best for me simply by Linpack's benchmark tests. Cyanogen 6.0 was 1.0 MFLOPS slower than the Kaos. And since I only care about performance, I thought it was best for me.
1 vote for kaosfroyo and 1 vote for move to general section. Can I vote twice
Sent from my FroyoEris
kalala said:
Wow. What arrogance displayed by some members.
I find that KaosFroYo works best for me simply by Linpack's benchmark tests. Cyanogen 6.0 was 1.0 MFLOPS slower than the Kaos. And since I only care about performance, I thought it was best for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not arrogance. Post in the right section. Not very hard. Or go back to androidforums
LexusBrian400 said:
Its not arrogance. Post in the right section. Not very hard. Or go back to androidforums
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol omg such nerd hostility on these forums
LexusBrian400 said:
Its not arrogance. Post in the right section. Not very hard. Or go back to androidforums
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol omg such nerd hostility on these forums, ITS JUST A FORUM WHO CARES
whojabacod said:
lol omg such nerd hostility on these forums, ITS JUST A FORUM WHO CARES
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A MOD moved YOUR thread. Why dont you ask him? He moved it because, like a dumb ass, you posted it in the wrong section. Follow the thread rules, or go back to androidforums which you obviously came from.
LexusBrian400 said:
A MOD moved YOUR thread. Why dont you ask him? He moved it because, like a dumb ass, you posted it in the wrong section. Follow the thread rules, or go back to androidforums which you obviously came from.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha did you see my 2nd post anyway this thread is dead im glad lexusbrian is now my friend
Umm just my two cents, but ya'll are telling him his thread should be in another section but a mod moved it to development... so it should stand to reason that the hostility is not needed. I'm still a noob here so I don't want to step on any toes. Personally I think this would give insight to the devs about what people think of their roms. I'm just saying
*edit* my bad for the confusion. I didn't realize how the forum handles moved threads. But can't we all just get along?
Sent from my Eris using XDA App
Exactly
Sent from my FroyoEris using XDA App
whojabacod said:
lol omg such nerd hostility on these forums, ITS JUST A FORUM WHO CARES
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Funny thing is, he is the same on AF as well.
Wow.
10 characters
The thread in the dev section was shut down by the mods for having an external link. Ziggy does not want to maintain a thread of his own on xda since he already maintains his site. So if any of you want to find his kernels, you can google ziggy471.
I have found his kernels to be beasts both for the inc and for the bolt. And have helped him test those for both devices. If anybody wishes to ask questions, feel free to do so on his site. He is very responsive.
Finally, I'm not sure why xda cares so much about external links. Its not as though they share ad revenue with devs who actually drive business to the site with their work!
Sent from my thunderbolt
I also agree, used Ziggy kernels on previous devices and they were great.
Thanks for the info, ill be trying his kernel for the tbolt now
Its dumb that they don't allow externel links...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
Hold on a second... A lot of devs link to their external sites... This is not unusual... Is this a new rule?
Sent from my Thunderbolt using Tapatalk
I assume it's because his site contains a pseudo-blog. They don't allow that.
If the external site is purely downloads-only it's typically allowed. None of the mods ever had issue with devs hosting files on my site and linking to them.
Not sure why they are enforcing that now but the storm thread was also locked down for a short while.
And you are right, many of the threads have external links. I'm curiously watching which threads they go after and which ones are holy cows.
Sent from my thunderbolt
Been running the 4-6 Kernel on the Virus ROM 3.1 and it rocks
Just to clarify, yes my thread was closed due to external links but that's not the whole story. From what I understood from the moderator all kernels posted on xda has to be complaint to the GPL. I can post links to his kernel only if ziggy provides a link to his source. Will contact ziggy later for this info if possible so I can get my thread open again.
Sent my PowerBolt via XDA App
nemesys504 said:
Just to clarify, yes my thread was closed due to external links but that's not the whole story. From what I understood from the moderator all kernels posted on xda has to be complaint to the GPL. I can post links to his kernel only if ziggy provides a link to his source. Will contact ziggy later for this info if possible so I can get my thread open again.
Sent my PowerBolt via XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's my understanding too. XDA is really big on being compliant with GPL. When someone asks for a kernel source and there is no response, 99.9/100 XDA will close the thread.
But if Ziggy is well known then why would they assume he was doing something damaging with his kernels?
dansto82 said:
Been running the 4-6 Kernel on the Virus ROM 3.1 and it rocks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesn't it though?
htowngator said:
But if Ziggy is well known then why would they assume he was doing something damaging with his kernels?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It has nothing to do with that. XDA adheres to the GPL, and so should he. He is breaking the license by not posting his source. By the way, check his github. He is not publishing it.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=755389
Anyone remember the stink we had over HTC doing the same thing?
I have never fully understood the gpl thing. Can somebody explain what it means in non legal terms? Why isn't it a problem if google does not release their honeycomb source code? I'm confused. Also, does this apply only to kernels or to roms too? And finally are there any carve outs for developer's to create unique code for themselves? Or if I decide to modify something for myself, I have to share it, github etc.
Sent from my thunderbolt
By the way, it was never a thread he started. It was posted by somebody else to start a discussion on xda about his kernels. Ziggy had never really cared to be on xda himself. He did not have a thread on the inc kernels either. And none of us cared, because all knew where to get them.
Sent from my thunderbolt
Then get them there.
Posting them here requires adherence to the GPL.
As mentioned earlier, it was not his thread. We have always gotten them from his site. Somebody else started a discussion thread for the benefit of users. I was surprised on seeing the thread because he found maintaining a thread too much work and xda also is not the correct format.
If the gpl license terms have to be applied always, can we please also ban all miui threads too? Lets not be hypocritical. Miui has never released its source code either yet their threads thrive.
Sent from my thunderbolt
khanam said:
As mentioned earlier, it was not his thread. We have always gotten them from his site. Somebody else started a discussion thread for the benefit of users. I was surprised on seeing the thread because he found maintaining a thread too much work and xda also is not the correct format.
If the gpl license terms have to be applied always, can we please also ban all miui threads too? Lets not be hypocritical. Miui has never released its source code either yet their threads thrive.
Sent from my thunderbolt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Miui is not GPL. Hardly relevant.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
Ziggy's BFS kernel is amazing. Trying it out now and I still have 58% left after 7 hours. Wow...love this kernel! And that's with pretty heavy use. Its a keeper!
Thunderbolt Rooted!
adrynalyne said:
Miui is not GPL. Hardly relevant.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why is that not gpl? Its an android rom. Why would they be exempted from what cyanogen follows?
Sent from my thunderbolt
khanam said:
Why is that not gpl? Its an android rom. Why would they be exempted from what cyanogen follows?
Sent from my thunderbolt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HTC only has to post there code for kernals not sense. Same with miui. Cyanogen is open source by choice, a community rom
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
khanam said:
Why is that not gpl? Its an android rom. Why would they be exempted from what cyanogen follows?
Sent from my thunderbolt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kernel=GPL.
Rom= mix of proprietary and Apache licensed source.
Apache does NOT require you to release your source.
Hello Every Dev!
I know most people were really about Sense 3.0......
But I hate it! :-[
Is anyone working on releasing (or have already in wait) an AOSP ROM for the for the E3D???
THANKS!
*I'm not a Dev....although u can't tell by ego*
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
kushdeck tweeted that he had his 3D, so I assume he'll be planning to port EVO Deck over this way, eventually. I certainly hope so, because his was my AOSP ROM of choice on my 4G.
Can't be done I'm afraid, for you see we don't have full root or S-Off yet....Please post your questions on the general section next time buddy
orpheostelos said:
Can't be done I'm afraid, for you see we don't have full root or S-Off yet....Please post your questions on the general section next time buddy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well unless this thread was already moved before I got to it, then he posted in the correct section. It is a question, and I am in the q and a section. If it was originally in a different section, then I apologize.
To answer the question though, I'm sure
that once we have S off then we will have our AOSP roms. That will be an exciting time.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Does anyone have the ICS rom from any of the developers that locked their threads? I would really love to try one out!
Liquids thread on rootz is still active, and has everything functioning but camcorder and data, calls and SMS work
Sent from my HTC Mecha using Xparent ICS Tapatalk 2
Deftoolfinch said:
Liquids thread on rootz is still active, and has everything functioning but camcorder and data, calls and SMS work
Sent from my HTC Mecha using Xparent ICS Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you please send me the url to the thread
ATHORNFAM2 said:
can you please send me the url to the thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lmfao...are you serious?
This thread is prime example of exactly what's wrong with XDA and similar sites... no need to elaborate further.
*Thunderbolt 4G*
anybody else have a problem with me asking a question about a rom in the rom section. The section that you can't get any decent file sharing links out of and have to ask people for.
Actually, had u posted in qna like its sposed to, you would get better response, also a google search turns up all builds
Sent from my ADR6400L using xda app-developers app
Agree with the others. Not trying to bash you but this is a ROM Development section. This is where Devs post their work and gain feedback. There should be nothing else in here but ROM releases. All questions, no matter what they are in reference to, goes in the Question and Answer section. Ask your question again in that section and maybe someone will be nice enough to do your homework for you. Again, this is in no way to offend anyone, just pure common sense.
sent from my phone.
flapjaxx's CM10/AOKP/JB kernel thread was closed, no info in the OP. This was the only JB kernel thread for i717 Note...Anybody knows what's up?
Been moved to a different forum. The link is floating around in one of his other posts.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Version 1.3 got released yesterday on his goo.im site.
I just noticed his thread and most of his other ones are now locked. The PA thread is in a completely different forum and every other post towards the end is oka1, so that's turning to **** too.
I've had luck talking to the XDA admins before...might get them to look into the state of the Note forums because it really is getting rediculous.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA Premium HD app
jjc5891 said:
Version 1.3 got released yesterday on his goo.im site.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
link?
Edit: Nevermind, got it. For those, who might be interested: http://goo.im/devs/flappjaxxx/i717/kernel/JB