Hey ive noticed people putting up screenshots of their phones performance up against other phone types.. ive been trying to track down one of them screenshots to show you what i ment, but its sorta like a graph. and usually there Device is at the top.
Sorry for not being specific. what is this ? i wanna see how my device is doing after i added some tweaks
It's a benchmark app called Quadrant , but it's not accurate .
A more accurate one would be AnTuTu Benchmark .
But then again , all these scores should be taken with a pinch of salt , or sugar or whatever condiment you prefer (= not pure)
Herpderp Defy.
Related
I am kinda lost here,
i dont really care about the score of benchmarks but its wierd that my score dont go higher than 3200 ( thats on custom roms ) while i got 3600+ on stock roms.
also has anyone figured out a fix for the wifi bug? wifi is connected but cant get any data. only fix so far is to toggle it on and off.
thanks
Benchmark software's like Quadrant is not well optimized with Dual Core phone's yet, so whatever you get don't bother it. And you want high score? Well run it for 5-6 times back to back, lets see
Hello XDA
This is my first tome to start a thread, hopefully I do it right
I am just confused on how ROMs show High Benchmark results in there screenshots, but when I try to do a benchmark on my Ace I get a VERY Low result compared to what it's supposed to be, Though I have made sure no apps are running in the background, and cleared my RAM, even after checking the Media tweak, Still Very low result, Can anyone Clarify me on how to make my phone better or is that I am doing something wrong?
I am using the glmst v2 KPO ROM
Don't even worry about it. With coderom I had 1927 max. Now with gingerReal I only get 1000+, but I feel this rom much better. So I dont rely anymore on quadrant scores. I suggest you to do the same.
even if u got trillion benchmark score it doesnt mean anything.. nowadays benchmark score is crap, doesnt mean a squat. i said that because gingerbread had some problem with quadrant, thus its result is inconsistent. even there are rom makers that spoof quadrant score by tinkering with phone i/o value to make their rom looks like it got highest benchmark score. i even found an app here on xda that automate that i/o spoof, install it and u'll get godlike quadrant score.
edited: the app to spoof benchmark score like i said is that in skynet post below. that should spike anyone quadrant score to 5000
Quadrant benchmark does not mean anything....its only relevant for lagfix or filesystem changes or some kernel tweaks. Otherwise it can be hacked easily to show high benchmark scores. Someone even showed quadrant benchmark above 2100 in ace by an app which hacked quadrant .
Yes there is even an app called quadrant booster which utilizes i/o hack to boost scores by Doomlord here-http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=17110408
Ok thanks guys..... Its that it gets annoying when u dont get what the rom promises ya
anyone tried benchmarks on honeycomb...? please share some results.... that will help all decide to update to HC or not on performance grounds....
thnx
Which benchmarks. Will depend if user is running a rom
mcord11758 said:
Which benchmarks. Will depend if user is running a rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
general ones quadrant, linpack ,pi ,antutu , browsermark and others... i was asking about official rom HC 3.2.1
benchmark
I ran the Quadrant app. dont know much about it, guess I did it correctly- I ran the full benchmark and my device scored 2096. I've ran it 3 times, each time it scores between 1900-2000 range. my device is a stock View 4G upgraded to Honeycomb through system updates. I updated over wifi, I don't have a sprint data plan. hope this helps-
Quadrant is same as it was on GB interesting!!! 3D n 2D benchmark scores on GB were quite low... i guess honeycomb wont affect these thing these r mainly depend on GPU n processor...
there will b just marginal difference...
With Nenemark2 i get 23-25 fps on Honeycomb
GB it was around 12-14 fps
Vellamo between 850-1100 - dont remember GB results
I would ask you not to mention specific ROMs
When the HD2 came out, the first months it was all about benchmark results...
There were ROM ranking lists based on benchmarks... but the comunity realized fast this was pure bull**** so it stopped after a while
Cooks optimized only for specfic benchmarks to get on top casue people started looking only at results... which often had nothin to do wit real life performance
Flyer.michael said:
With Nenemark2 i get 23-25 fps on Honeycomb
GB it was around 12-14 fps
Vellamo between 850-1100 - dont remember GB results
I would ask you not to mention specific ROMs
When the HD2 came out, the first months it was all about benchmark results...
There were ROM ranking lists based on benchmarks... but the comunity realized fast this was pure bull**** so it stopped after a while
Cooks optimized only for specfic benchmarks to get on top casue people started looking only at results... which often had nothin to do wit real life performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
after reading thing i might move to honeycomb .... so we get improved graphics perfomance.....
and vellamo was 820 on GB...
so flyer was under powered with GB...
i heard 1.5 ghz processor was also under powered so i guess bechmark pi will also give better result...
thanx man please test some more on HC... antutu gave a bad score with GB
Ok the title says it..I don't know about you guys but either I was blind before or what but I have a slight boost in performance in quadrant by 300 points to around 2300 or so..I also tried CF bench and antutu...antutu puts my phone exactly on par with the GS2 but the GS2 is slightly ahead...also cf bench shows an increase in overall score..ill put pics up later..just my 2 cents....what are you guys seeing after the OTA?
jonathan413 said:
Ok the title says it..I don't know about you guys but either I was blind before or what but I have a slight boost in performance in quadrant by 300 points to around 2300 or so..I also tried CF bench and antutu...antutu puts my phone exactly on par with the GS2 but the GS2 is slightly ahead...also cf bench shows an increase in overall score..ill put pics up later..just my 2 cents....what are you guys seeing after the OTA?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Edit: I do take in mind that quadrant does not work well with dual core so scores won't be accurate from my understanding.
ok so i kno people say benchmarks dont mean ishh but i like to play around with them to see what i can pull.. so they mean something to me. what i do not understand is why i cant get over 3100 on quadrant.. my evo lets me overclock to 1.8.. i have tryed just about every rom and cant get over 3100.. the set up that i got 3100 with was kmmod7beta7_3 htc shooterCDMA.. i quess its a new cm7 rom.. i used that rom and the kernel that it comes with.. its an anthrax kernel that comes with the rom.. can someone please let me kno of a few set ups that mite let me beat the 3100 score.. rom and kernel combo... yes i do have alot of free time on my hands because im collecting unemployment at this time.. so with me not working rite now the only this there is to do is fill out job apps and tinker with my phone!!!! lol
evod3 said:
ok so i kno people say benchmarks dont mean ishh but i like to play around with them to see what i can pull.. so they mean something to me. what i do not understand is why i cant get over 3100 on quadrant.. my evo lets me overclock to 1.8.. i have tryed just about every rom and cant get over 3100.. the set up that i got 3100 with was kmmod7beta7_3 htc shooterCDMA.. i quess its a new cm7 rom.. i used that rom and the kernel that it comes with.. its an anthrax kernel that comes with the rom.. can someone please let me kno of a few set ups that mite let me beat the 3100 score.. rom and kernel combo... yes i do have alot of free time on my hands because im collecting unemployment at this time.. so with me not working rite now the only this there is to do is fill out job apps and tinker with my phone!!!! lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant is the worst benchmark program available. It's old and runs too quickly on new hardware to be consistent which is why you get 5 different numbers if you run it 5 times. Often you get a higher Quadrant score if you run it 5 times: you'll notice the score gets higher each time you run it up to about the 3rd or 4th time. That said, Quadrant puts a heavy emphasis on database I/O. Search for a tweak called Adrenaline Shot. It has updated sqlite lib files that make Quadrant scream through the database I/O portion and that'll bring your scores up dramatically. That is... if you just want higher Quadrant scores. It isn't useful for anything else.
Mike
mikeyxda said:
Quadrant is the worst benchmark program available. It's old and runs too quickly on new hardware to be consistent which is why you get 5 different numbers if you run it 5 times. Often you get a higher Quadrant score if you run it 5 times: you'll notice the score gets higher each time you run it up to about the 3rd or 4th time. That said, Quadrant puts a heavy emphasis on database I/O. Search for a tweak called Adrenaline Shot. It has updated sqlite lib files that make Quadrant scream through the database I/O portion and that'll bring your scores up dramatically. That is... if you just want higher Quadrant scores. It isn't useful for anything else.
Mike
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks bro!! yea i kno its not a big deal it just gets me heated i cant get over 3100!! lolz! ill try what u said.. by the way your awakenings kick ass!!