Related
Thats right, just loaded it up after rooting this bad boy and it is working just fine!
I am not responsible if you brick your device in the process.
UPDATE!
Ok so here is what is needed to run this badboy without problems.
Use only the conservative option (least problematic and no sleep comas)
I dont use the widget, i already know the speeds i set it at.
The settings stick even after a reboot, but when you click on the setcpu icon they revert back and you lose your settings. If that happens just go back and click on detect auto speeds and set up your speeds again.
Happy clocking!
what version? 2.0.1?
Were you able to overclock it past the 1ghz?
I rooted mine today and installed setCPU which worked flawlessly but I am not able to move the slider past 1ghz.
I loaded it on mine and while it *appears* to work, it doesn't seem to effect the clocks any.
heck just underclock your phones to save battery lol
I can only seem to clock mines to 800? hmm. I noticed when i first opened setcpu it was clocked to 384/245!! wow so low
edit: setting it to nexus one/snapdragon Qsd it clocks to 1ghz exact. not really sure it's working though
jroid said:
I can only seem to clock mines to 800? hmm. I noticed when i first opened setcpu it was clocked to 384/245!! wow so low
edit: setting it to nexus one/snapdragon Qsd it clocks to 1ghz exact. not really sure it's working though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To see if it's working set it to underclock and then get into an adb shell and run the command: cat /proc/cpuinfo
It should display cpu data that includes the current clock speed.
I don't know if this helps but when I was in the Quadrant Standard app it has the system info. I hit it, scrolled down to cpu and it said
Current: 400 mhz, Max: 1000 mhz, Min: 100 mhz,
and I just checked it now and it said my current clock was 800 mhz, so i guess the cpu scales dynamically based on what the load is and what we are doing, thats a pretty great power saving feature.
Select 'Auto Detect'.
I believe you need an oc'd kernal to be able to move the slider past 1ghz.
Also, the dev has stated that it should be set to 'conservative', not 'ondemand'. 'Ondemand' was causing random shutdowns on the Galaxy S.
I installed SetCPU on my Vibrant too but removed it because it appears that it caused the phone to power off.
Does there need to be device specific support for a processor/device or does the auto-detect work on any processor?
Koblek said:
I installed SetCPU on my Vibrant too but removed it because it appears that it caused the phone to power off.
Does there need to be device specific support for a processor/device or does the auto-detect work on any processor?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look at the post before yours.......from me.
SetCPU needs to be set to 'conservative' on the Vibrant, not 'ondemand'. Also, per the dev in the "Random shutdowns?" thread: "You can "simulate" ondemand by changing freq step in Advanced to 100%"
Has anyone noticed any significant battery conservation with this?
MINUS Stl said:
Look at the post before yours.......from me.
SetCPU needs to be set to 'conservative' on the Vibrant, not 'ondemand'. Also, per the dev in the "Random shutdowns?" thread: "You can "simulate" ondemand by changing freq step in Advanced to 100%"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey, sorry if this sounds like a stupid question, but why does it max out at 800,000?
i am still having problems with setcpu even on conservative mode. i have stopped using setcpu completely for now.
wbexpress said:
Hey, sorry if this sounds like a stupid question, but why does it max out at 800,000?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Auto detect...
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
i have this on my rooted vibrant. Max is 1000 and Min is 100. My battery life has doubled. I have not experienced any force closes, no slowness and no freezing. the phone is running super fast and smooth. Love it. After looking at the stats, it seems like the CPU uses 400 and 800 a lot.....thats probably where the extra battery life comes into play. 1000 is used when on full load.
mygti02 said:
i have this on my rooted vibrant. Max is 1000 and Min is 100. My battery life has doubled. I have not experienced any force closes, no slowness and no freezing. the phone is running super fast and smooth. Love it. After looking at the stats, it seems like the CPU uses 400 and 800 a lot.....thats probably where the extra battery life comes into play. 1000 is used when on full load.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are your exact settings in profiles, advanced and overview?
any one running their phone at 1Ghz all the time?
+1, hah2110 please post your settings if they're working for you so a noob like me can learn some things!
Hey TB Users....
Was wondering who is rooted and using set CPU?
Also what profile set ups is everyone using and what are the outomes you are seeing.
Another thing i noticed is that the TB is auto set to 1024000 CPU instead of 998000. not sure if that is normal, but hey just my 2 cents.....
Anyway lets hear what everyone is set to
Franzie3 said:
Hey TB Users....
Was wondering who is rooted and using set CPU?
Also what profile set ups is everyone using and what are the outomes you are seeing.
Another thing i noticed is that the TB is auto set to 1024000 CPU instead of 998000. not sure if that is normal, but hey just my 2 cents.....
Anyway lets hear what everyone is set to
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think you have to wait for the source code for the kernal to be released and tinkered with to get anything useful from all that...but who knows
Yup. About all you can use it for right now is throttling (which isn't bad... the CPU is plenty fast already). It'll help save battery, at least.
Odinist said:
Yup. About all you can use it for right now is throttling (which isn't bad... the CPU is plenty fast already). It'll help save battery, at least.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. That's all I use it for now.
I have it set to the following:
Screen off = 245 max
Charging = 1024 max
Battery < 10% = 245 max
Battery less than 25% = 768 max
All other istances = 1024 max
It will do for now until we get custom kernels.
SuperFly03 said:
Agreed. That's all I use it for now.
I have it set to the following:
Screen off = 245 max
Charging = 1024 max
Battery < 10% = 245 max
Battery less than 25% = 768 max
All other istances = 1024 max
It will do for now until we get custom kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pretty much what I did, minus everything but the screen off
I always set the screen off on my evo 4g to 245 max, and will probably do the same here. Kinda waiting for kernal source code to be released so I can use the smartass governor. I always liked that one.
Franzie3 said:
Hey TB Users....
Was wondering who is rooted and using set CPU?
Also what profile set ups is everyone using and what are the outomes you are seeing.
Another thing i noticed is that the TB is auto set to 1024000 CPU instead of 998000. not sure if that is normal, but hey just my 2 cents.....
Anyway lets hear what everyone is set to
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I downloaded Quadrant immediately after rooting w/o installing SetCPU & first run pulled off a 1926...second run a 2000 flat! So I installed SetCPU & set it to performance & the most I got was mid 1800's which is what I was pulling off before I rooted.
I remember on my droid playing around with the up threshold & it would speed things up & so I did but still stayed at consistent 1800's. Uninstalled & I'm running 1900's consistent, only hit 2000 once lol.
I cannot wait to tinker once HTC releases the kernel source!
mthorn79 said:
I downloaded Quadrant immediately after rooting w/o installing SetCPU & first run pulled off a 1926...second run a 2000 flat! So I installed SetCPU & set it to performance & the most I got was mid 1800's which is what I was pulling off before I rooted.
I remember on my droid playing around with the up threshold & it would speed things up & so I did but still stayed at consistent 1800's. Uninstalled & I'm running 1900's consistent, only hit 2000 once lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quadrant scores don't mean everything. If you installed SetCPU and noticed a speed decrease then there would be a reason to not want it, but just because you get a lower score in quadrant?
*EDIT* just thought I'd say, I just ran Quadrant with SetCPU on performance, and got a 1978 score. So I DK what you are talking about.
HTC really needs to release the source code. To my understanding it should be out sooner than later? I sure hope so...
nosympathy said:
quadrant scores don't mean everything. If you installed SetCPU and noticed a speed decrease then there would be a reason to not want it, but just because you get a lower score in quadrant?
*EDIT* just thought I'd say, I just ran Quadrant with SetCPU on performance, and got a 1978 score. So I DK what you are talking about.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok I'm not an idiot, I know quadrant scores don't mean anything but some people use it as a gauge to get an idea on how their phone is. (If u feel it does nothing for you then don't use it if u don't want to no one asked you to)
If you know anything about phones you know certain people's will vary in speeds, I'm just posting my experience...this IS afterall a "Post Your SetCPU Settings' thread, so don't be getting all uppity.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
Jimmy058910 said:
HTC really needs to release the source code. To my understanding it should be out sooner than later? I sure hope so...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. I think they releases it within 45 days or something like that. It will most certainly be here soon.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
Any incoming call issues with Screen Off set at 245?
Steeler86 said:
Any incoming call issues with Screen Off set at 245?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no and their shouldn't be, unless you down the road, since you couldn't do it now, use one of the governors like Conservative which tend to really slow the phone down. On my Evo 4G it used to take a good 30 seconds to unlock the screen is I used that with screen off at 245Mhz.
1570 for me on stock rom.
I got 2000+ quadrants on stock ROM. SA for setCPU, I can't get my CPU to clock down by force with any app. I think the kernel source is going to be needed. Probably have perflock on like they did on my inc. Let me know if setCPU works please.
SetCPU works, you just have to hit the menu button and click "disable perflock"
1376 on VirusRom but it is soooo snapppy
Seems to be working for me. 39% battery after 12+ hours. Just with the "screen off: max245" setting.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
We finally got the source code!
Do I need to flash this to overclock
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1016916
or can I wait for SetCPU to update?
Undervolting and profiles.
I have tried a crap ton of different undervolting setting, but none work
Also the profiles in set cpu don't seem to work for me. I have a few of them set and it always sits on the top one I need some guidence with both please!
Another thing my xda premium app isn't pushing my notafications yes its set
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Undervolting is a delicate process. It takes time to find the max undervolt that is stable. With that being said, try undervolting everything by the lowest amount which is -25mv. Check to see if that is stable. If so proceed to go further. Remember lower freq will typically undervolt farther than higher frequencies.
As far as profiles go your probably not using the priority values right. The higher priority is what determines which profile setcpu uses. So for instance if you want a safeguard against overheating, you could set the profile for when the cpu goes above 55C to throttle the processor way down. If you set this profile to 100(max) it will overide all other profiles at 98, 99, 75, 50...etc. Also this may be obvious to some but be sure to tick(enable) the profiles button. If thats not ticked then it doesnt matter how many profiles you have set up. It simply wont use them.
jack_slapped said:
Undervolting is a delicate process. It takes time to find the max undervolt that is stable. With that being said, try undervolting everything by the lowest amount which is -25mv. Check to see if that is stable. If so proceed to go further. Remember lower freq will typically undervolt farther than higher frequencies.
As far as profiles go your probably not using the priority values right. The higher priority is what determines which profile setcpu uses. So for instance if you want a safeguard against overheating, you could set the profile for when the cpu goes above 55C to throttle the processor way down. If you set this profile to 100(max) it will overide all other profiles at 98, 99, 75, 50...etc. Also this may be obvious to some but be sure to tick(enable) the profiles button. If thats not ticked then it doesnt matter how many profiles you have set up. It simply wont use them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I was on alien rom, I tried 25 on all and it restarted after like a minute. What worked for me was 25 25,50,50,75,75,100 fromm bottom to top. I tried it with cm7 and total no go lol
Lemme tryi 25 on all and see what I get and I didn't know that. They all werent working, so I set them all to 100 lmao, I understand that now
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Aparently its been running 125,125,50,75,75,75,75bottom to top cm7 with 1.3 kernel.
It did restart a couple min ago randomly. Will keep posted
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Glad your getting some results. If it restarts even once it means at least one of your undervolted freq isn't stable. With your settings I would wager its in the uper freq considering your undervolt in the lower freq isn't too extreme. You might try decreasing the undervolt for your upper freq to -50 -50 -50 starting at the top. Might help to stabilize bc higher freq just require more voltage. If that proves to be stable continue trying to reduce the lower freq as much as possible. Mainly bc if you set your profiles right(screen off is the most important really) your phone will spend the majority of its time on the 200mhz freq. Thus the more undervolt on that freq should theoretically give the most benefit from undervolting. This is just all from personal experience. I'm no guru. Just spent way too much time adjusting voltages on phones . And of course having the upper freq undervolted as much as possible cant hurt either.
jack_slapped said:
Glad your getting some results. If it restarts even once it means at least one of your undervolted freq isn't stable. With your settings I would wager its in the uper freq considering your undervolt in the lower freq isn't too extreme. You might try decreasing the undervolt for your upper freq to -50 -50 -50 starting at the top. Might help to stabilize bc higher freq just require more voltage. If that proves to be stable continue trying to reduce the lower freq as much as possible. Mainly bc if you set your profiles right(screen off is the most important really) your phone will spend the majority of its time on the 200mhz freq. Thus the more undervolt on that freq should theoretically give the most benefit from undervolting. This is just all from personal experience. I'm no guru. Just spent way too much time adjusting voltages on phones . And of course having the upper freq undervolted as much as possible cant hurt either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
25,50,50,50,50,75,75
Still getting a reboot:'(
Only good thing about the reboot is it turns on instantly
PROFILES CONFIRMED WORKING trying to indwrvolt this thing
I think I'm gonna order another battery too bc this one isn't getting the 16 hours it was, I cant say much bc I'm screwing with the settings hardcore xD I will show.all settings in a sec
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Blahhh
Put blah there so it would post lol. Also going to download a stress test or quadrent thing to test the stress and find maximum uv
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Undervolting COMPLETE=D
QUAD SCORE! OCED 1.3 CM7
Right now I'm thinking my battery life is going to be amazig and if I turned the data off when not using it... omg I would last like 2 straight days prolly=D
So pumped to test everything morrow!!
Side note:800mhz or above wont go past 75 >:/
Had really important question to ask you but forgot
Also tried putting 215 to 275 that was a no go lol. My question was is there a battery manager and info like the stock one for cm7?!!!
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Smittyzz said:
Undervolting COMPLETE=D
QUAD SCORE! OCED 1.3 CM7
Right now I'm thinking my battery life is going to be amazig and if I turned the data off when not using it... omg I would last like 2 straight days prolly=D
So pumped to test everything morrow!!
Side note:800mhz or above wont go past 75 >:/
Had really important question to ask you but forgot
Also tried putting 215 to 275 that was a no go lol. My question was is there a battery manager and info like the stock one for cm7?!!!
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well my battery was draining mad quick so I am not overclocking It anymore unless I want to show off or play games lol, lost 20% in one hour. Now its stable and undervolted
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
First off, regarding SetCpu and over / undercloking, dev has said it'll only underclock/overclock ONE core at a time. It's a bug and he's working on it from what I understand. If both cores are needed to be in use at the same time, no over / underclocking will be applied. Secondly, profiles work as they should in SetCpu, so that's a problem on your end. Third, the undervolting can't be more than 100mv differnce between jumps. See screen shot.
http://www.multiupload.com/YUK0KPXZLJ
Phalanx7621 said:
First off, regarding SetCpu and over / undercloking, dev has said it'll only underclock/overclock ONE core at a time. It's a bug and he's working on it from what I understand. If both cores are needed to be in use at the same time, no over / underclocking will be applied. Secondly, profiles work as they should in SetCpu, so that's a problem on your end. Third, the undervolting can't be more than 100mv differnce between jumps. See screen shot.
http://www.multiupload.com/YUK0KPXZLJ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand the 100 thing and I got the undervolting and profiles done. I hope he gets both cores supported soon and thank you dmfor the reply
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Yea Im skeptical about not setcpu not having support for dual cores... Did some searching on the net and couldnt find anything to support that. As far as not the tegra 2 not being able to do over 100mv jumps. That's not true. My lowest frequency is 600mv (-150) and my next frequency is at 750mv. That's a 150mv difference right there... And I'm completely stable. Its entirely dependent on your processor. They are all different and respond differently to undervolting. You just have to find what works for you. Generally though the lesser the jumps in voltage will give you more stability.
a good kernal helps too im useing faux123 v2.0 0C1.3 its undervolts quite well
us/alienv4UL/OC1.3{webtop2sd{fixed}
hey guys.
i have been wondering about this problem for a long time, and i could not find a solution to it. Thus, i wanted to ask you guys about it. The max i can overclock my phone to is 748. whenever i try to raise it to about 768 or 787, the phone will freeze and restart. is it due to the hardware limitations of my phone? or isit due to some software limitations?
Please help.
Just Hardware.
(I can overclock to 729 )
Hi. I'm still using Gingerbread stock rom 2.3.3 but with latest franco's kernel. My max. clock is 710Mhz. Anything above that, my phone will get freeze very often. Is there any recommendation on what should i set for my min. clock as well as the Governor?
SacredGuy said:
Hi. I'm still using Gingerbread stock rom 2.3.3 but with latest franco's kernel. My max. clock is 710Mhz. Anything above that, my phone will get freeze very often. Is there any recommendation on what should i set for my min. clock as well as the Governor?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use the performance gov. and it's worked well.
SacredGuy said:
Hi. I'm still using Gingerbread stock rom 2.3.3 but with latest franco's kernel. My max. clock is 710Mhz. Anything above that, my phone will get freeze very often. Is there any recommendation on what should i set for my min. clock as well as the Governor?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use stock 2.3.3 v20g + franco kernel and set max clock at 729Mhz, sometimes it freeze, but normally work fine (with any gov).
Each CPU is a little different. My OV is stable at 600 with smartassv2 but once I step it up to 729 the phone will randomly freeze or reboot.
Sometimes you get a good cpu that can be OCed a bit, and sometimes you get one that can go no further then stock. If you can OC then consider yourself lucky.
Whenever you try to increase the max frequency beyond a certain limit the CPU can not handle that and tells the kernel about that and kernel starts to Panic... (reboots or freeze)
For example My phone remains stable upto 768 MHz (usually i keep it at 748Mhz....)
but if i increase it to beyond 806 MHz it starts to panic...
Hardware
Has differences on hardware, already tried with 2 differents P500, one could overclock to 768 Mhz, the other can reach 800Mhz without freeze.
karven said:
Has differences on hardware, already tried with 2 differents P500, one could overclock to 768 Mhz, the other can reach 800Mhz without freeze.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since all the p500 have same hardware, they can be OC to same max frequency if they have same software config...
806! never freezes but she gets warm! can get over 40 celcius
EDIT
Mind you i only get about 16 hours of battery life LOL
shubhamjain001 said:
Since all the p500 have same hardware, they can be OC to same max frequency if they have same software config...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
where did u get ur facts?
are u smart or just effin noob?
yours preferred governors????
actually the best one is....
Dude keep it around 652 and interactive otherwise UR Battery will drain fast
depends on ur ROM+kernel combo.
on oxygen v1.1 i smoothly ran on 480-768 and battery lasted around 2 days with average use.
Now on Cm7 nightly, equally smooth at 729-480 and battery is awesome too..
Overclock
Ohhh!!! lucky guys.. my phone only accepts 672Mhz at max or anything above that value leads to rebooting or freezing.
Rom: Cyanogenmod 9 (Android 4.0.3)[BETA4]
Kernal: Franco Kernal - 4
OC: 480/672 Max
I get 748MHz completely stable when pushing "performance" governor with franco #4.
But irrespective, this is not about bragging...one would see LITTLE real life difference (save for frying the CPU faster) going above 672MHz. Don't just look at synthetic benchmarks...feel your phone.
Oh...and it was mentioned multiple times that 600->806MHz uses the same voltage hence the same power consumption for Sidestep CPUs.
I am running max CPU @ 729 and it has been running smooth for days with no freeze/reboots, I also noticed having the Governer on Performance has helped my battery life and such, i havent noticed the phone getting any warmer whatsoever so no problems with heat, Also I am using a LG-P504 Optimus One which Ive heard is the final release for this phone, so maybe its more stable than the pervious versions.
My p500 can handle 768 max. With some kernels 787mhz. But i am running 245-710 with miui v4: lol:
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
Yea mine can handle that too but it drains my battery faster I've noticed. So now I run Max @ around 720 which seems quite stable!! Only time I use the nitrous feature also is with playing more top end games which I otherwise wouldn't be able to play without really low fps.
Sent from my LG-P504 using XDA App
Im using cyanogenmod nightly 7.2.0 build 34 on 748 mhz with any governer and it's working very well.OC also depends on ROM's.each ROM has different capabilities to OC...
alright. ive been playing around and cant find some good governors for what i want.
for hardcore gaming, what governor have you found that works the best
for best batter saving, but still be able to watch videos, surf web, email and just general navigating without it being too slow.
which governors do you guys use for both of those? thanks
Quadrider10 said:
alright. ive been playing around and cant find some good governors for what i want.
for hardcore gaming, what governor have you found that works the best
for best batter saving, but still be able to watch videos, surf web, email and just general navigating without it being too slow.
which governors do you guys use for both of those? thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
anyone?
Use the smartassV2 governor. It regulates the CPU frequency according to load (sorta like ondemand except it works better).
darkghost568 said:
Use the smartassV2 governor. It regulates the CPU frequency according to load (sorta like ondemand except it works better).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i tried and i liked it, but it like locked my cpu at 1.24ghz (thats the max i have it set to) and even if i changed it, it would lock to the max frequency????
Quadrider10 said:
i tried and i liked it, but it like locked my cpu at 1.24ghz (thats the max i have it set to) and even if i changed it, it would lock to the max frequency????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll have v1 of Funky kernel out soon if you want to try out wheatley.
I've been a fan of smartassV2 since the first time I used it on the Thunderbolt. It is as close to an ideal governor as I've ever used. SmartassV2, with a complete sysfs implementation, can be tweaked very nicely. It is a governor that you can really tune so that most of the time it's not running balls out, but it's not loafing along either, which is how a governor SHOULD function. (I like to see a nice bell curve peaking at an ideal frequency, and spiked way out at the bottom frequencies when I look at a bar chart of my time-in-state's.) From what I can tell, few if any devs tune their governors to their kernels. I'm thinking that's how we ended up with a dozen or so governors that are rather similar, yet rarely ideal.
Snuzzo said:
I'll have v1 of Funky kernel out soon if you want to try out wheatley.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wheatley is epic.
Sent from my Rezound using Tapatalk 2
loonatik78 said:
I've been a fan of smartassV2 since the first time I used it on the Thunderbolt. It is as close to an ideal governor as I've ever used. SmartassV2, with a complete sysfs implementation, can be tweaked very nicely. It is a governor that you can really tune so that most of the time it's not running balls out, but it's not loafing along either, which is how a governor SHOULD function. (I like to see a nice bell curve peaking at an ideal frequency, and spiked way out at the bottom frequencies when I look at a bar chart of my time-in-state's.) From what I can tell, few if any devs tune their governors to their kernels. I'm thinking that's how we ended up with a dozen or so governors that are rather similar, yet rarely ideal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright now my problem is that I set my CPU to 192mhz lowest and 1.24 max. And that's for normal use. I'm running smart ass2 Nd it's not licking my CPU at max anymore, but it keeps.moving the max to 1.51ghz.
any ideas on how to fix tht?
Quadrider10 said:
any ideas on how to fix tht?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No frills CPU in play store
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Quadrider10 said:
Alright now my problem is that I set my CPU to 192mhz lowest and 1.24 max. And that's for normal use. I'm running smart ass2 Nd it's not licking my CPU at max anymore, but it keeps.moving the max to 1.51ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrider10 said:
any ideas on how to fix tht?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. Don't use DSB's kernel. I spent DAYS trying to figure out what his kernel is trying to do as far as governors. I'm not going to talk smack about the guy's work, but I will tell you what I know.
I doesn't appear any of the governors have been tweaked for his kernel. It looks like code was just tossed in there and left however someone else wrote it. For instance, smartassV2 has a sleep_wakup_freq of .998GHz, which is much slower than it should be. It SHOULD be near or equal to scaling_max_freq. Likewise, the max_cpu_load (which determines when the cpu should scale up) is 70, a fairly aggressive number, while the awake_ideal_freq and sleep_ideal_freq are pointlessly high. If I had to guess, these look like parameters for a Snapdragon S1 SoC, not the dual core S3 the Rezound has. No matter what governor you choose, it's only active on "cpu0". "cpu1" runs ondemand no matter what. The reason you have trouble making settings for the governor stick is because the sysfs location disappears and reappears for no obvious reason. It appears when things pop in and out (presumably when cpu1 goes on and off line), things are reset.
Cold hard reality is this: You're NEVER going to optimize any kernel out there to it's fullest potential. Either the options aren't there to tweak, or they behave in inexplicable ways. I can't tell you why DSB's kernel (not to single out a dev or his work, but I'm certain that's the kernel you're talking about) does what it does, but it's so far divorced from optimized on such basic levels you're better off not wasting your time.
As an aside:
After getting a rough feel for what some of these kernels are doing, I'm not at all surprised some kernels have had significant heat and battery drain issues. There are things that simply do not work right or work consistently. The devs shouldn't be blamed for this. These are probably the issues they're trying to work around that they inherited from the sources they're starting from and what makes tweaking them so difficult.
I acutely got everything to work. I'm just trying to overclock the GPU.