Hi, does anyone here know where can i get a digitizer without the at&t logo I saw a white galaxy note with a black screen digitizer and I have to say It looks awesome! like a huge galaxy nexus... but, however i looked all over the internet and i cannot find any that doesn't include the lcd, the ones with no lcd are for the n7000.
It's probably easier to get a black Note and swap the battery cover, than to get a white Note and swap the digitizer...
Same effect
Yes, but I need a european version because I don't want the AT&T logo on it.
Barry (NJ) said:
It's probably easier to get a black Note and swap the battery cover, than to get a white Note and swap the digitizer...
Same effect
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ajtorres14 said:
Yes, but I need a european version because I don't want the AT&T logo on it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Euro version will not be i717, and will have the button on the bottom.
Maybe a Rodgers or Bell, Canadian version, will be what you want(?)
ajtorres14 said:
Yes, but I need a european version because I don't want the AT&T logo on it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would suggest you ask or look in the GT-N7000 sub-forum (I assume that's the model you have). I doubt the AT&T logo digitizer would work as a replacement for your Euro version. Also make sure your phone doesn't or has the glass/digitizer glued together before you order and waste your money.
Barry (NJ) said:
The Euro version will not be i717, and will have the button on the bottom.
Maybe a Rodgers or Bell, Canadian version, will be what you want(?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suspect the Canadian versions are similar to the AT&T version, as they all have the same model designation + a letter to differentiate between carriers.
Rogers Note here, no AT&T logo anywhere, just says Samsung at the top.
clockcycle said:
I would suggest you ask or look in the GT-N7000 sub-forum (I assume that's the model you have). I doubt the AT&T logo digitizer would work as a replacement for your Euro version. Also make sure your phone doesn't or has the glass/digitizer glued together before you order and waste your money.
I suspect the Canadian versions are similar to the AT&T version, as they all have the same model designation + a letter to differentiate between carriers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He as a white I717 from AT&T, but wants a black digitizer and doesn't want the AT&T logo on it any more
Courtesy AllGamer from this post
SGH-i717 models:
SGH-i717 = ATT
SGH-i717R = Rogers
SGH-i717D = Telus
SGH-i717M = Bell
Barry (NJ) said:
He as a white I717 from AT&T, but wants a black digitizer and doesn't want the AT&T logo on it any more
Courtesy AllGamer from this post
SGH-i717 models:
SGH-i717 = ATT
SGH-i717R = Rogers
SGH-i717D = Telus
SGH-i717M = Bell
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the clarification, guess reading through tapatalk I wasn't reading it right
How about a screen protector with colored border?
This continues to be 1 of the main issues with the US carriers: their lame branding...
And the fact they decide to give different names to the same exact phone models (except with some changes here-and-there).
Too bad here in the US, we only get the iPhone and Motorola phones early (which is pathetic). We can thank the 2 reasons listed above for this fiasco.
Aren't the expensive? Like around $250 I believe
Sent from my SGH-I717R using xda premium
Personally its not worth the trouble..or the money. Just sayin...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
the screens are interchangeble. You can get screen without logo for international version but also you will need a set of new buttons. Since the screen is glued to housing it is also easier to install with new housing. Then just flash the rom with international version because of the button. Digitizer is glued to lcd touch so expect to waste roughly $300-350 in order to get rid of att logo. As stated earlier its not worth it.
Leo2005 said:
the screens are interchangeble. You can get screen without logo for international version but also you will need a set of new buttons. Since the screen is glued to housing it is also easier to install with new housing. Then just flash the rom with international version because of the button. Digitizer is glued to lcd touch so expect to waste roughly $300-350 in order to get rid of att logo. As stated earlier its not worth it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't flash an international rom, it will brick the phone. The hardware is different.
Related
Is there a reason why my GS2 has no samsung or carrier branding?
Completely black at the top, and logo at back.
I like it, but have always been curious as to why.
Here are some pics. MAybe it is carrier branded I never noticed the "q" thing before which carrier is that?, but there is no samsung.....
Seeing as I have been flashing roms for the past two weeks and no issues, so It seems genuine...
Quadrant=3229(Normal)
Are serial numbers on battery and label behind it supposed to be the same?
and BTW I have a matte screen protector, thats why its not glossy.
and lcd density set at 200, which is why the font looks slightly smaller
Battery and label looks official
Thanks!
Oops, shouldn't it have a Samsung logo just above the screen and under the Earpiece? The battery cover at the back could be easily replaced with an original one, and that icon at back is the NFC icon right? So is it a Korean GS II or what?
Sent from GT-I9100
My GS2 has Samsung on the top of the front and at the bottom of the back but came unlocked to all networks,personally i wouldn't buy a phone with say Vodafone or any mobile network branding on it again.
I though every SII has "Samsung" on the top front, no matter if branded or not
Sp1tfire said:
I though every SII has "Samsung" on the top front, no matter if branded or not
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i agree name brandings are always on phones or the phone is from China ^^ and have dual sim card slots.
If i where you i check it out if its a real samsung device.
Good luck.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
endor43 said:
Is there a reason why my GS2 has no samsung or carrier branding?
Completely black at the top, and logo at back.
I like it, but have always been curious as to why.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you post pictures?
Sp1tfire said:
I though every SII has "Samsung" on the top front, no matter if branded or not
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree return it to the seller .
Samsung label and product code under the branded Samsung battery as well .
jje
Just updated First post with pics and info,
Thanks!
Oh, edited my comment after the seeing pictures.
ithehappy said:
Oops, shouldn't it have a Samsung logo just above the screen and under the Earpiece? The battery cover at the back could be easily replaced with an original one, and that icon at back is the NFC icon right? So is it a Korean GS II or what?
Sent from GT-I9100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah, the NFC icon is this.
had ISDB-T antenna in corner so could it be a SC-02C? If so why does settings say its GT-I9100 and have no SC-02C branding at back?
Does anyone know what the icon in back is?
Even though quadrant is good, I'm really starting to worry...
I appreciate everyone's help.
Ah, the box tells alot
Its apparently a SHW M250-K, so not a GT-I9100, but still a GSII model!
The Q things is an O for Olleh its KT carrier in korea. Yes my phone is korean, but I took a chance and had bought it in China.
Though none of this explains the lack of Samsung branding in front. Or does it?
(or why my settings tells me its a GT-I9100 or is that the ROM's doing?)
endor43 said:
Ah, the box tells alot
Its apparently a SHW M250-K, so not a GT-I9100, but still a GSII model!
The Q things is an O for Olleh its KT carrier in korea. Yes my phone is korean, but I took a chance and had bought it in China.
Though none of this explains the lack of Samsung branding in front.
Or does it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does the SMS work? Because the SMS technology is locked to specific Korean carreir so you will not be able to use it. If I recall correctly.
If you did a google image search with the model, it would appear that there is no Samsung branding in the front.
No, sms works on china unicom for me (im living there for now).
But I've just discovered some inconsistencies.....
The box says its an SHW-M250K but sticker behind battery says M250S....
What is the difference between the two?
The battery has NFC label, but I have no Idea how to test if thats real.
What do you guys think? (about whether my phone is valid GSII)
Hmm the box has SHW-M250K and Olleh printed on it, but it has stickers and barcode sticker, that indicate SK telecom. Also, I've just discovered that M250S is SK and M250K dentoes KT. Seems a bit odd.
Again, Thoughts?
When I google'd "Galaxy S II" it came up both with samsung logo and without?
Not quite sure
Edit: SHW-M250K is the korean model which doesn't have a Samsung logo on the front
So yeah, it's not fake
The original Samsung Galaxy S II had a different front and a back cover. There was no branding on the front. The prototypes that our team saw had no branding. I can post a picture if you want.
Random but applicable---I also cannot get FM radio app to pick up fm radio in China. Does that have to do with my region settings (USA or Europe are only choices), or is this another inconsistency?
Where did you buy this device from?
Dinghao Electronics Market, Beijing. Which is black market.
I know not the best idea, but It was my only chance to get one...
Anyways, I just discovered that Korean GSII has DMB chip instead of FM radio chip, bummer, but not a big deal.
Crap what to do what to do....
http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-note-headed-to-usa-on-att-says-fcc-30184411/
I have had a cracked screened iphone since May waiting on the SGSII for AT&T... Im not gonna let speculations determine how long I wait for a new device ever again haha.
splitsonface said:
I have had a cracked screened iphone since May waiting on the SGSII for AT&T... Im not gonna let speculations determine how long I wait for a new device ever again haha.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm on the same boat, but this and the nexus prime both make me wonder.
i'm getting this no matter what. i'm tired of my fruit.... no more apples and mangoes.... back to the green robot i go.... and if something like and hd/note/prime comes out, the wife will be getting a pretty cool hand me down
"If you always wait for the latest and greatest, you'll never own a phone"
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Earthsdog said:
Crap what to do what to do....
http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-note-headed-to-usa-on-att-says-fcc-30184411/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing about that article says the Galaxy Note is coming to AT&T.
In fact if you look at the model number, it's clear that the version that just went through FCC approval will never be sold by AT&T. Usable on AT&T - yes. Actually sold by AT&T - no.
AT&T phones have a model designator starting with SGH. SGH-I897 (Captivate), SGH-I997 (Infuse), SGH-I777 (AT&T GSII)
International generic units have a model designator starting with GT. The unit in that article is GT-I9220. So it's an international model that, while it will work on AT&T's network, will NEVER be sold by them in a contract-subsidized fashion. AT&T has NEVER sold a GT model on contract in the United states. If history is any indicator, if the Galaxy Note is ever sold by AT&T, it's going to be about a six month latency before the AT&T version drops. (See, for example, the delay between the GT-I9100 and the SGH-I777)
Entropy512 said:
Nothing about that article says the Galaxy Note is coming to AT&T.
In fact if you look at the model number, it's clear that the version that just went through FCC approval will never be sold by AT&T. Usable on AT&T - yes. Actually sold by AT&T - no.
AT&T phones have a model designator starting with SGH. SGH-I897 (Captivate), SGH-I997 (Infuse), SGH-I777 (AT&T GSII)
International generic units have a model designator starting with GT. The unit in that article is GT-I9220. So it's an international model that, while it will work on AT&T's network, will NEVER be sold by them in a contract-subsidized fashion. AT&T has NEVER sold a GT model on contract in the United states. If history is any indicator, if the Galaxy Note is ever sold by AT&T, it's going to be about a six month latency before the AT&T version drops. (See, for example, the delay between the GT-I9100 and the SGH-I777)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How would one obtain an international version for T-Mo then? Or is it a possibility that they will pick it up?
If it's like the I9100, an International variant supporting the T-Mobile bands won't exist. T-Mobile may or may not sell their own variant.
The heavy customization of the T-Mobile GS2 is a sign that you likely won't see the Note sold on contract with TMo or even any compatible with their 3G bands.
I'm happy with my Streak...even if it is still running 2.2.2, but, I'm looking at the Note also. If it gets to at&t before summer of 2012, I'll grab it.
Is it going to have a notifications led light?
Entropy512 said:
If it's like the I9100, an International variant supporting the T-Mobile bands won't exist. T-Mobile may or may not sell their own variant.
The heavy customization of the T-Mobile GS2 is a sign that you likely won't see the Note sold on contract with TMo or even any compatible with their 3G bands.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It must suck being on a carrier that uses 3G bands that basically no one else in the world uses...
p51d007 said:
I'm happy with my Streak...even if it is still running 2.2.2, but, I'm looking at the Note also. If it gets to at&t before summer of 2012, I'll grab it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yah i was loving the streak too (esp with steve's excellent builds). but i sold that for the s2, and i really miss the big screen. for me, the sgs2 feels like a downgrade hahahaha. ill be getting the note when it comes out full price. might have to sell the s2 to help pay for it
Really want to lug around a 5.3 inch screen for a daily device? Your back pockets won't forgive you. 4.5 is the largest that is comfy I think...
jflexe99 said:
Really want to lug around a 5.3 inch screen for a daily device? Your back pockets won't forgive you. 4.5 is the largest that is comfy I think...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1........
I've carried the 5" streak in a velcro closing belt loop case for over a year w/o any problems. The Note, with the 5.3" screen has less top & bottom than the streak does, so it won't be all that different
jflexe99 said:
Really want to lug around a 5.3 inch screen for a daily device? Your back pockets won't forgive you. 4.5 is the largest that is comfy I think...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
TOO Big for my taste. and too small to be a "pad"... not sure where this falls in to .. I'll be keeping my SGS2... only thing I WOULD change to is the Prime
I think the Note would be great for me, especially at work where carring even a 7" pad would be restrictive. I would use the stylus to write my notes all day long at work.
jflexe99 said:
Really want to lug around a 5.3 inch screen for a daily device? Your back pockets won't forgive you. 4.5 is the largest that is comfy I think...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've had the streak in my pocket every day since December 26 2010. Not an issue at all, if it is then you haven't owned one or have a very small figure or wear skinny jeans. I can't wait for the Note to come out, it will be in my pockets daily as my personal phone, along with my Atrix work phone. And BTW, the Streak is more often in my front pocket than back.
I've had the S2 since Friday and I love it. However, I have had my eye on the Note since I heard about it last month. Looks like a lucky family member will be getting my S2 once the Note come out If I don't like the Note then I'll take my S2 back, I can because I'm indian.
I figured someone with more knowledge on this could set the record straight. The T-Mobile version of the Galaxy S II went on sale today and mine should arrive tomorrow. MY GUESS is that ROMs, modems, and kernels would not be interchangeable between the two devices. So should a new forum be created for the T-Mobile variant? Anyone have some insight?
EDIT: Question answered. Yes... we will need a new forum for the T-Mobile variant.
luckyduck69 said:
I figured someone with more knowledge on this could set the record straight. The T-Mobile version of the Galaxy S II went on sale today and mine should arrive tomorrow. MY GUESS is that ROMs, modems, and kernels would not be interchangeable between the two devices. So should a new forum be created for the T-Mobile variant? Anyone have some insight?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As to a new forum - no one in this forum would be able to do it, we're just users.
And NOTHING about the T-Mobile GS2 will be interchangeable with the AT&T version. The T-Mobile variant doesn't even deserve a GS2 designation - other than having a sAMOLED screen it's closer in hardware architecture to most HTC devices than any Samsung.
Entropy512 said:
As to a new forum - no one in this forum would be able to do it, we're just users.
And NOTHING about the T-Mobile GS2 will be interchangeable with the AT&T version. The T-Mobile variant doesn't even deserve a GS2 designation - other than having a sAMOLED screen it's closer in hardware architecture to most HTC devices than any Samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
uh...they're almost identical. the tmo version has a sexier backplate and a bigger screen. and snapdragon ftw.
but yeah, i just researched and found all of this out. which in turn answered my question. i originally thought they would be completely identical with the exception of operating frequencies. guess not.
luckyduck69 said:
uh...they're almost identical. the tmo version has a sexier backplate and a bigger screen. and snapdragon ftw.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol! Are you serious? Or joking? I can't read the e-sarcasm here.
If your not joking then let me explain further. The snapdragon is a completely different soc meaning that development will be completely different for it than the international or att sgs2. Essentially NOTHING is the same.... In the development world... Real world the only similarity is the manufacturer.... And it has an samoled screen... But even that's not the same. Lol
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
So...Mods... Will we be receiving a forum for the magenta variant? Will be at my local store early Wednesday morning.
txcyko said:
So...Mods... Will we be receiving a forum for the magenta variant? Will be at my local store early Wednesday morning.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This isn't the "ask the mods" forum, this is the "AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II" forum.
Hey there,
I am currently considering buying a Galaxy S II off eBay here in Australia and i was wondering what I should and shouldn't be looking for.
My main concern is that if I get Hong Kong/International stock then it may have differences (OS or Hardware) to the ones you can buy locally. Is there a way I could check to see where the handsets come from based on a model number or anything? and is anyone using an eBay bought SII to list the differences to local stock?
Thanks in advance,
DarkRyoushii
I bought mine off ebay ages ago, was listed as Australian stock...so if you are worried about overseas models just use the advanced search and choose only located in AU...then if it is not stated in the description just ask the seller if its aussie stock...though in most cases ones from overseas work just fine and I don't believe there are any differences (both local and overseas stock are international versions, besides the I9100T for telstra)
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Thanks, there's a massive price difference between Australian ($700) and Unmentioned ($550) stock though so if possible I'd just love to make sure it won't turn up in some unheard of language with no way to change it, the wrong bands, restrictions (I know NTT Docomo limit text messages to 160 characters) on the OS or something like that.
so the I9100 stock is all the same with no variations? I thought there were different letters at the end to signify which region they were made for..
Thanks again,
DarkRyoushii
hmm well I got mine for $600...I'm pretty certain they are the international version...as long as it states I9100 and nothing else, it should be fine...also some sellers (eBay shops usually), provide 1 year warranties as well..
EDIT: there is an Australian stock on eBay now for 600 + 15 postage...if you're really that worried I'd recommend you just save yourself the worrying... I'm sure you could message the seller and negotiate for free shipping or something...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
That's true Thanks for your help! +1 Thanks to you!
Your biggest concern with ebay is getting scammed, rather than getting a weirdo off-spec unit. As others say make sure it says I9100, and specs make sense (eg. 1.2 dual exynos, 4.3" screen, etc.) If you ended up with a qualcomm unit by accident (and wanted exynos...or vice versa) and your seller is legit they would have to accept return for product not as advertised.
I'm planning on ordering a case for my phone so I have it when it arrives. I've ordered the 32GB version through Verizon and was wondering if there was any difference in between the international version I9300 vs the LTE version I535. The specs seem to line up when comparing the two, but I'm concerned that the buttons may line up in slightly different places.
The case I'm looking at is here:
noreve.com/langue/en/product/Samsung_GT-i9300_Galaxy_S_III_Tradition_leather_case.html
Although it's for the international version, do you think it'll work the the Verizon LTE version?
Thanks for your help!
I'm pretty sure there are not physical differences on the outside
nicholaaaas said:
I'm pretty sure there are not physical differences on the outside
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I figured this was true. Thanks!