(REQ) Tun.ko for ICS leak - HTC Amaze 4G

Simple enough request. Looking for someone who can compile a Tun.ko file for the ICS leak kernel so we can set up VPNs. Once achieved upload it on the Tun.ko installer so we can use it for DroidVPN. I don't really have enough technical know how to do this but know it is very relevant in our current online lives with CISPA and other governments fighting to destroy our freedoms. Thank you in advance. (note to mods. Apparently I can't post in dev due to post count move if nessecary)
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using XDA

Related

[Q] [KERNEL] NFS module - Any chance anyone's made one?

I've been wanting to do this for a while - I have an nfs server at my house for all my music and whatnot and if it would be frickin' sweet if I could just mount the share on my Vibrant over my wifi. I'm currently using the JAC XMOD OC/UV w/Voodoo kernel on JI6. If someone could send the module my way I'd love to mess around with it.
This is my first time posting in the Vibrant forums, so let me take a second to say thanks to all the devs and everyone who's helped turn this phone from being a laggy, buggy, "ugh this is disappointing" into an absolute pleasure to use!
First time posters usually get flamed for posting things in the incorrect section like you are doing.....so do yourself a favor and read before posting, or search
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Why reinvent the wheel... just put a upnp server on your server and share files through AllShare...
stefan.buddle said:
First time posters usually get flamed for posting things in the incorrect section like you are doing.....so do yourself a favor and read before posting, or search
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think his post is in the wrong forum, but...
Anyways, for the OP, you can get the source code for King's kernel here:
(argg... I can't post links yet)
So, check here: [KERNEL] [2.6.29.6] [Flashable-.zip] [LAGFIX][BFQ][Oc][Uv] #3 "Patches 'O Klick"
And scroll down to: "All my code is on github"
All you have to do then, is enable the nfs module in the config, and recompile.
If you have compile a kernel for yourself before, this shouldn't be that hard.
I don't know if JAC's kernel source is published anywhere. According to the GPL, he has the obligation to share. But I'm not sure anyone asked for it yet.
Jac has a github a well. It was a little out of date last time I looked, but it's there.
You'll also needs some userspace utilities, portmapper being the primary one. Might have to enable RPC as well. Havent looked at that part of the source so not sure if its on by default in anyone's repo.
Cool, I had a feeling I was going to have to just compile it lol. If/when I wind up getting it I'll be sure to post it. Thanks guys.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Any luck with this?

PDroid on ICS ROMS

Anyone got it working and care to explain how? thanks fellas.
-edit- i really meant to put this in Q&A
Let me save you some trouble.
From the FAQ:
Do you plan on adding Froyo/ICS support?
Yes. But I have not ported PDroid to Froyo or ICS yet. No ETAs yet. You'll need some patience there.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=19570074&postcount=1
Only works on GB at the moment.
pinoymutt said:
Let me save you some trouble.
From the FAQ:
Do you plan on adding Froyo/ICS support?
Yes. But I have not ported PDroid to Froyo or ICS yet. No ETAs yet. You'll need some patience there.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=19570074&postcount=1
Only works on GB at the moment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are patches floating around for cm9. I'll have to find the thread again and post it here. I don't really understand how to use the files in that thread.
Here's the link pastime posted for aokp. I hope someone can integrate this into one of tasks builds, or task himself. That would be a really awesome addition to a near perfect rom.
http://www.mediafire.com/?5b9gltodp1br7zz
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium

What to do after creating a rom?

I have created a rom and themed it. But i wnt some performance tweaks and some apps which i could integrate in settings.apk
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
hell_lock said:
I have created a rom and themed it. But i wnt some performance tweaks and some apps which i could integrate in settings.apk
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looking forward for your rom..
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium
maybe u coulf add rom control with its tweaks?
So start looking at performance tweaks and such, and if you are adding some stuff to pre-compiled APKs then look into smali and the tools you need to use to manipulate it.
thewadegeek said:
So start looking at performance tweaks and such, and if you are adding some stuff to pre-compiled APKs then look into smali and the tools you need to use to manipulate it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Smali is too hard for me! I only undrstnd xml
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
hell_lock said:
Smali is too hard for me! I only undrstnd xml
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If all you understand is XML then you are going to be hard pressed as what you want to do will need to be done by editing the smali or the Java source code
Sent for a corner cell in Arkham
[RANT]
Oh boy...I just love it when people start saying
"I'm building a ROM", "I'm doing dev work", "I want to be a recognized developer"
Then I make suggestions and I get "That's too hard", "Do you have a download link" "Cn u teac me hw mak a custm kernel?"
Yet they are totally unwilling to actually invest some time into these things and LEARN it.
Guy's Rome wasn't built in a day, and your ROM isn't going to be either. Look around, read, SEARCH SEARCH SEARCH. Download other people's stuff not just to Kang it, rename/re-post it under your name, but to LEARN, to figure out how it works, so you can UNDERSTAND. This isn't like a store, where you walk in and go "I want one of those, and I'll take one of them, and please get me that, where can I find this, etc, etc." Make little modifications, tweaks on top of tweaks, and keep doing that until it's soemthing new, soemthing different, and THEN post it. But please don't limit yourself, to what is "Easy" or "Comfortable", it's not the way to get anywhere with real development work, much less in life. Put some time into it, and some effort. I really do wish you all luck, but you guys have to stop looking for the easy way to get some quick credit.
[/RANT]
@OP I know of zero performance modifications that you can do in XML, and if you are looking to use someone else's work and use that then start searching and make sure you ask before you use it.
thewadegeek said:
[RANT]
Oh boy...I just love it when people start saying
"I'm building a ROM", "I'm doing dev work", "I want to be a recognized developer"
Then I make suggestions and I get "That's too hard", "Do you have a download link" "Cn u teac me hw mak a custm kernel?"
Yet they are totally unwilling to actually invest some time into these things and LEARN it.
Guy's Rome wasn't built in a day, and your ROM isn't going to be either. Look around, read, SEARCH SEARCH SEARCH. Download other people's stuff not just to Kang it, rename/re-post it under your name, but to LEARN, to figure out how it works, so you can UNDERSTAND. This isn't like a store, where you walk in and go "I want one of those, and I'll take one of them, and please get me that, where can I find this, etc, etc." Make little modifications, tweaks on top of tweaks, and keep doing that until it's soemthing new, soemthing different, and THEN post it. But please don't limit yourself, to what is "Easy" or "Comfortable", it's not the way to get anywhere with real development work, much less in life. Put some time into it, and some effort. I really do wish you all luck, but you guys have to stop looking for the easy way to get some quick credit.
[/RANT]
@OP I know of zero performance modifications that you can do in XML, and if you are looking to use someone else's work and use that then start searching and make sure you ask before you use it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This.
You won't develop a ROM overnight. Go learn some real programming and stop compiling other peoples work and making a ROM that is "your own."
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
rohan32 said:
This.
You won't develop a ROM overnight. Go learn some real programming and stop compiling other peoples work and making a ROM that is "your own."
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who are you referring it to? I cooked a rom and I think that I have made the rom. Of you don't have anything to help me then please don't comment. I don't understand smali but I know how to read tutorials and add more features in the rom by smali editing like swipe to remove, 14 toggle etc.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
I never ask for an easy way out. I add features in my rom manually!!
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
He was being helpful, he is bringing up a attitude that is rampant here on XDA, namely the "cooking" of ROMs. There are WAY too many people who just cook a ROM in a kitchen and claim to have "developed" it. No, you just re-packaged somebody's work, it's not the same thing. I'm not saying it's useless, but it causes way to many "developer" wanna-be's that just aren't interested in actually learning something. Up above we posted suggestions and you responded with
Smali is too hard for me! I only undrstnd xml
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That creates the impression that you aren't wanting to try any other methods for creating ROMs. If you were trying to say that you don't know smali, then maybe you should have said something like,
I don't know smali so I'm not sure how well I could implement features like that. Do you guys have any suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not only is that easier to read, but it also communicates much more clearly what you are trying to say/ask. But the way that post is currently worded it makes it sound like you are just wanting to re-package somebody's work and use it as your own.
thewadegeek said:
He was being helpful, he is bringing up a attitude that is rampant here on XDA, namely the "cooking" of ROMs. There are WAY too many people who just cook a ROM in a kitchen and claim to have "developed" it. No, you just re-packaged somebody's work, it's not the same thing. I'm not saying it's useless, but it causes way to many "developer" wanna-be's that just aren't interested in actually learning something. Up above we posted suggestions and you responded with
That creates the impression that you aren't wanting to try any other methods for creating ROMs. If you were trying to say that you don't know smali, then maybe you should have said something like,
Not only is that easier to read, but it also communicates much more clearly what you are trying to say/ask. But the way that post is currently worded it makes it sound like you are just wanting to re-package somebody's work and use it as your own.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is very true, I'm new to porting and I'm starting with porting so I can learn the ins and outs of a rom so at a later time I can learn to develop, even in porting I've had to back smali and make some edits to get things working so sooner or later you will have to as well.. I'm currently reading a begginers guide on java for android.. Google is my best friend and I'm trying to learn as much as I can because I have an idea of my 'ideal' rom.. I can't wait for someone else to do it so I can port it and I know it will never be the way I want.. I'm doing it mainly for myself and I hope one day I can share with others
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Best thing to do is get on the good side of a dev and ask them to teach you, I had great help from some of the best devs on XDA, but as above its not something you can just learn easily, I already had a pretty good knowledge of Java and XMLs etc before i got a smart phone lol, If you stick to it then you should get somewhere, Java is a pain in the ass though, editing .smalis is probably the hardest thing for a new dev
Think About It
TO GET STARTED
Fix Bugs
Test it,
Decompile APKS and modify them if you have permission
Add features and tweaks
Put it up on git.
Help YOUR USERS and stop asking silly questions
snowman77 said:
TO GET STARTED
Fix Bugs
Test it,
Decompile APKS and modify them if you have permission
Add features
Put it up on git
Help YOUR USERS and stop asking silly questions
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Done all dat.. Srry to ask dis question. Seems like people here are not helpful. Everyone is a flamer.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
hell_lock said:
Done all dat.. Srry to ask dis question. Seems like people here are not helpful. Everyone is a flamer.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't seen one post of someone flaming you in this thread. We tried to give you some advice and you said it was too "hard" so we all shut up and left you alone.
thewadegeek said:
I haven't seen one post of someone flaming you in this thread. We tried to give you some advice and you said it was too "hard" so we all shut up and left you alone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I prefer bein left alone so pls dont comment again..
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
hell_lock said:
I prefer bein left alone so pls dont comment again..
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well then you shouldn't have started the thread, I'm not trying to "flame" by any means... but if you wanna add some performance settings and mods I'll give you some advice thewadegeek gave me, take a look at aokps or cm9 or whoever's git repo you feel has some similar features to those you wish to add and start there, you'll get a good understanding of how everything works... at that point it comes to the fine details and making sure everything works.. when you have issues at that point you then can ask for help on getting the fine details fixed since at that time you'll have specific issues that someone can help with
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2
evol4g said:
Well then you shouldn't have started the thread, I'm not trying to "flame" by any means... but if you wanna add some performance settings and mods I'll give you some advice thewadegeek gave me, take a look at aokps or cm9 or whoever's git repo you feel has some similar features to those you wish to add and start there, you'll get a good understanding of how everything works... at that point it comes to the fine details and making sure everything works.. when you have issues at that point you then can ask for help on getting the fine details fixed since at that time you'll have specific issues that someone can help with
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks.. Thats what I wanted
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
hell_lock said:
Thanks.. Thats what I wanted
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem man, good luck to ya
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

HELP: Kernel Development Environment

Does anyone have a step by step guide to setup a kernel development environment for the HTC Flyer.
I am new to this and I cannot get the environment setup correctly
Please someone help or does anyone have an image of there dev machine
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using XDA Premium HD app
Anyone??
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using XDA Premium HD app
Start searching. If you can't find the info yourself, then you probably aren't going to do much good as a kernel "dev". Also read up on GPL, they are getting stricter about it around here and as such there are rules as to what you can post ROM/kernel wise. I would avoid any kitchens, and do it all from scratch. I'll give you two links though.
Toolchain: https://github.com/DooMLoRD/android_prebuilt_toolchains
Source: http://www.htcdev.com/devcenter/downloads
That and a Ubuntu machine are all you need to get going. Just as a warning, takinga image of somebody's dev machine, and then pulling Leedroid's or Doomlord's source code and compiling is not building your own kernel. Start from scratch, google, search, learn and it's going to take a bit. I'd start with adding some extra CPU governor's if I were you, it's the easiest.
Oh and I'd wait more then two hours next time before bumping my own post, also google is a amazing thing. Did you try it.
http://forums.androidcentral.com/ht...how-build-your-own-kernel-package-source.html
Some very nice and helpfull thoughts there.
First steps r always hard. With proper help they can get much easyer. U prolly wouldnt be walking if u wouldnt recive a help from your parents.
Ioiwillioi asked for help. He said he is new in kernel developing. He said he is having some problems with seting up. I am sure he is mature enought he knows for web search.
Not all ppl like to build their knewladge base up from scratch with no help... After all we all benefit on other ppl knewladge and take shortcuts... If u dont feel same then burn all books, cut off internet and do all from scratch.
Google search has some disadvantages as well not onlly Google knows it all syndrome...
Now if u can help him with going faster in proces please do.
Help or stfu?
Fake edit: IoiWilliI that bump... u siriuslly could do it faster lol
ninja edit:
IoiWillloI is Sensles HC rom developer. I seen first post at his early atempts:
"With all due respect, but adding an APK, swapping some files etc., is not an useful contribution for the community. If you really want to add something, work on ICS instead We need more developers on that case, and it would be more useful than 10 HoneyComb ROMs"
Today some belive his rom is best HC rom for Flyer. Gl IoiWillioI with growing in kernel developing skilz.
You seriously think my post is unhelpful? If so I'm more then happy to delete it buddy.
thewadegeek said:
You seriously think my post is unhelpful? If so I'm more then happy to delete it buddy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I appreciate the help wadegeek however you could be a little bit more supportive, so far i have stuck to ROM stuff and even if i do say so myself i have done quite a good job, and i though rather than google it i thought i would ask in the forum that was designed for the device, (in case of any device specific requirements etc) i mean thats just logical thinking :O
I dont think jprednik meant any offense
Also thank you for all of the positive comments and feedback jprednik,
EDIT: Its my post i'll bump when i want to
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using XDA Premium HD app
ioiwillioi said:
I appreciate the help wadegeek however you could be a little bit more supportive, so far i have stuck to ROM stuff and even if i do say so myself i have done quite a good job, and i though rather than google it i thought i would ask in the forum that was designed for the device, (in case of any device specific requirements etc) i mean thats just logical thinking :O
I dont think jprednik meant any offense
Also thank you for all of the positive comments and feedback jprednik,
EDIT: Its my post i'll bump when i want to
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am being supportive, I'm just saying if you take some to look it up on your own you'll get to the exact sameplace. Also I believe spamming is against the forum rules, which was why I mentioned the post bumping. It wasn't really needed.
Sent from my SCH-R760 using Tapatalk 2
thewadegeek said:
I am being supportive,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No you're not. You're being the opposite of supportive.
Its not a step by step, but this thread on the Nook Color 3.0 for ICS Kernel development has some insights into what it takes.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1677219&highlight=kernel
Ok, THIS supportive enough?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1748297
And I answered all his questions. Being supportive does not equal babying him(or her...I think your a him).
helpfull
thx and yes i believe thats helpfull and suportive.
thewadegeek said:
Ok, THIS supportive enough?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1748297
And I answered all his questions. Being supportive does not equal babying him(or her...I think your a him).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Thanks.
thewadegeek said:
Start searching. If you can't find the info yourself, then you probably aren't going to do much good as a kernel "dev". Also read up on GPL, they are getting stricter about it around here and as such there are rules as to what you can post ROM/kernel wise. I would avoid any kitchens, and do it all from scratch. I'll give you two links though.
Toolchain: https://github.com/DooMLoRD/android_prebuilt_toolchains
Source: http://www.htcdev.com/devcenter/downloads
That and a Ubuntu machine are all you need to get going. Just as a warning, takinga image of somebody's dev machine, and then pulling Leedroid's or Doomlord's source code and compiling is not building your own kernel. Start from scratch, google, search, learn and it's going to take a bit. I'd start with adding some extra CPU governor's if I were you, it's the easiest.
Oh and I'd wait more then two hours next time before bumping my own post, also google is a amazing thing. Did you try it.
http://forums.androidcentral.com/ht...how-build-your-own-kernel-package-source.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right another question ,
Once i have the Zimage what do i have to do with it, i know about building it into a boot.img but when i flash my kernel the cpu values etc don't appear to change :/ is it something i need to specify in the .config prior to building or is it something i do in the process of zimage to boot.img ?
That would all be in the config file. Are you using LeeDroid's CPU frequency tables? And if you started your source from scratch, did you add anything to Kconfig? I would really need to take a look at your source, do you have a Github? Or can you post exactly what you changed?
thewadegeek said:
That would all be in the config file. Are you using LeeDroid's CPU frequency tables? And if you started your source from scratch, did you add anything to Kconfig? I would really need to take a look at your source, do you have a Github? Or can you post exactly what you changed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't change the kconfig :/ I can commit it to github later is that any good??
So the kernel compiles fine but there are no options to got about 1495 when trying to OC
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using XDA Premium HD app
Yep get it into a github and I'll take a look to see if I can help. You will need to make some changes to the different configs though. And out of curiosity, which kernel did you pull your .config from? Or did you use a default from arch/arm/configs?
thewadegeek said:
Yep get it into a github and I'll take a look to see if I can help. You will need to make some changes to the different configs though. And out of curiosity, which kernel did you pull your .config from? Or did you use a default from arch/arm/configs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock HC config and will get it to got hub asap
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using XDA Premium HD app
Ok, I won't be able to take a serious look until this evening though.
This post I think is going to be quite helpful in my attempt to swing a bat at this dev stuff... thanks for the info folks

[DEV][KEXEC/INIT] Photon/Elecrify Kexec and Second Init

This thread includes discussion and work product for porting the kernel kexec facility as a module, and related tools (kexec-tools). The basis is the Eternity project and all git code repositories maintain the history from Eternity.
The project stems from the desire to overcome the OTA 2.3.5 locked bootloader/signed kernel limitation. More ideas will likely come during the work, but the starting point is clear.
As for the 'misspell' of Electrify (as Elecrify) -- my apologies to the good folks with that phone. Sheesh! One little typo -- forever it lives.
Status
kexec_load.ko:
The module was modified with the necessary information from the Photon kernel (Electrify to come). It currently loads, and (apparently) runs safely. However, until the kexec-tools (and relevant dependencies) work properly, the module will just sit there. There will surely be bugs as it moves, so don't load it unless you just want to see it load.
Source code: http://gitorious.org/xda/photon-kexec-mod
kexec-tools:
The tools currently build and will run on the phone. The point at which to load kexec, though, remains a work in progress. Kernel loads, atags read in, and initrd reads successfully. Reboot (kexec -e) success remains elusive.
Source code: https://gitorious.org/xda/photon-kexec-tools
Second Init:
Coming soon as we can get it reasonably safe ... check for updates for when code is checked in.
Kernel and Related Sources from Motorola:
Photon: http://sourceforge.net/projects/photon4g.motorola/files/
Electrify: http://sourceforge.net/projects/electrify.motorola/files
Developer Listing
tdhite (that would be me)
twaffle
Indirect
more to come... (hopefully)
I will keep this post up to date with any relevant new information as development progresses.
For background on getting to this point, please read this thread before posting. Our good friend nickman529 just couldn't stand the OTA mess any longer and asked for a solution. Thanks also goes to our man Indirect for not letting us get away early with a [paraphrasing] "nah -- can't work, right?" attitude. Many others also had many great ideas -- just read the other thread! We don't seek to exclude anyone here.
Here we go ...
Amazing work guys. Waiting for electrify one
Keep good job
LightingZ said:
Amazing work guys. Waiting for electrify one
Keep good job
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gopi at Motorola has put it on the software groups plate to clean up the builds to ensure they are complete. No ETA as of yet for the source release, but generally it takes them anywhere from a day to a week to respond to the requests.
Even though I was the one whom suggested kexec to begin with...I'll look into it when I get some free time.
-ahem- http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=36190270&postcount=112
Sent from my hidden jewel
Indirect said:
Even though I was the one whom suggested kexec to begin with...I'll look into it when I get some free time.
-ahem- http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=36190270&postcount=112
Sent from my hidden jewel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey, I was looking at information back in October. Of course, at that point, I had never knew (or heard) of KExec.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1942046
---------- Post added at 02:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:00 PM ----------
twaffle said:
Gopi at Motorola has put it on the software groups plate to clean up the builds to ensure they are complete. No ETA as of yet for the source release, but generally it takes them anywhere from a day to a week to respond to the requests.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Updated information. Gopi requested that sources be provided by the end of the week. So possibly, by tomorrow.
twaffle said:
Hey, I was looking at information back in October. Of course, at that point, I had never knew (or heard) of KExec.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1942046
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was mainly directing that I didn't get -any- credit. Kind of insulting because when I first pointed it out it was like "No that'll never work" "Oh wait, no it will" and they completely skipped over me. >.>
Indirect said:
I was mainly directing that I didn't get -any- credit. Kind of insulting because when I first pointed it out it was like "No that'll never work" "Oh wait, no it will" and they completely skipped over me. >.>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, I want to wholeheartedly apologize. I do remember reading your post now, when I was scanning the message thread.
It was originally thought it could not work, as kexec is not enabled in our kernel. I had to point out that kexec *modules* exist, which is what makes this possible, when combined with the dynamic loading of modules from /system during the init process.
But your right, and should be noted in the OP, imho.
Indirect said:
I was mainly directing that I didn't get -any- credit. Kind of insulting because when I first pointed it out it was like "No that'll never work" "Oh wait, no it will" and they completely skipped over me. >.>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You look good in print -- re-read the original post. LOL. Just remember, though, all sorts of folks brought all sorts of good ideas, but I have to say you did push on Kexec, though many of us know it well -- thinking no way. Good on ya dude :highfive: -- sign up to develop if you can help.
twaffle said:
Gopi at Motorola has put it on the software groups plate to clean up the builds to ensure they are complete. No ETA as of yet for the source release, but generally it takes them anywhere from a day to a week to respond to the requests.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey -- how comfortable are most folks with grabbing the Android and kernel sources, then setting up development? It's a chore, but if I need to add that to the original post (a pseudo tutorial link) I can do that. I'll create a new 'tools' repo on the xda Gitorious project and checkin my scripts regardless.
Just lemme know.
Happily sign up to dev. I'll take a look tonight after I get home in about an hour.
Sent from my hidden jewel
First issue for us is that the build of kexec-tools creates improper executables due to no crt0.o -- mean no _startup symbol exists. NDK apps have this a lot, I just haven't had time to resolve.
Sent from my Slim Photon using xda app-developers app
twaffle said:
Hey, I was looking at information back in October. Of course, at that point, I had never knew (or heard) of KExec.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1942046
---------- Post added at 02:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:00 PM ----------
Updated information. Gopi requested that sources be provided by the end of the week. So possibly, by tomorrow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ELECTRIFY OSS source code is available for Releases : 4.5.1A_SUN_USC_16.7 and 4.5.1A_SUN_USC_19.0
I am happy to be able announce that the sources for the Electrify have been published.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/electrify.motorola/files/4.5.1A_SUN_USC_16.7/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/electrify.motorola/files/4.5.1A_SUN_USC_19.0/
Feel free to spread the word!
---------- Post added at 04:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:25 PM ----------
tags07 said:
ELECTRIFY OSS source code is available for Releases : 4.5.1A_SUN_USC_16.7 and 4.5.1A_SUN_USC_19.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You beat me to the punch! X-D
Hey, can someone share their Electrify config file so I can build down a module?
Just do the following and send me the file, or post it:
zcat /process/config.gz >/sdcard/config
Thx
Sent from my Slim Photon using xda app-developers app
# zcat /process/config.gz >/sdcard
config
zcat: /process/config.gz: No such file or directory
Sent from my Motorola Electrify using Tapatalk 2
---------- Post added at 01:33 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:27 AM ----------
Lol figured it was proc. Upload some.
Sent from my Motorola Electrify using Tapatalk 2
I have an Electrify MB853 to help. Just gotta get squared away here and get everything set-up. I'm an novice, but will do what I can and hope to learn a thing or two.
tdhite said:
Hey, can someone share their Electrify config file so I can build down a module?
Just do the following and send me the file, or post it:
zcat /process/config.gz >/sdcard/config
Thx
Sent from my Slim Photon using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried to do that but...
C:\Users\Itay>adb shell
$ su
su
# zcat /process/config.gz >/sdcard/config
zcat /process/config.gz >/sdcard/config
cannot create /sdcard/config: read-only file system
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
_____________________________________________________________________________
I have copied it with ES File manager =]
config.gz (13 KB)
https://mega.co.nz/#!H0I0iIJD!DmSkf2AfxqVw0WcR30e7ZR2XtFc-H2JLNmDc2bNz1gk
BTW i love MEGA.
Jst wanted to know .. is it unlocked bootloader...??? I m getting bore.. to use this 2.3.5 and frustrating. Is there any way to moved out 2.3.5 ?????
Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk
sonurajput56 said:
Jst wanted to know .. is it unlocked bootloader...??? I m getting bore.. to use this 2.3.5 and frustrating. Is there any way to moved out 2.3.5 ?????
Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bootloader on 2.3.5 is locked down pretty god, that's why tdhite is trying to get kexec to work for 2.3.5, it will allow us to insert a new kernel and 2init to run a custom rom on a locked bootloader.
Heres the conf: http://www.mediafire.com/?ii1rb23emkhavp9
LightingZ said:
Tried to do that but...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm... Seems Electrify does not mount a sdcard at /sdcard? Maybe /mnt/sdcard is the place. Over time I need to know (don't have an Electrify so I dunno how the mounts go).
Thanks for the config, regardless. I'll be working on the kexec-mod build today.

Categories

Resources