Our Verizon bill is ridiculous, and I might be switching to Sprint soon. If so, this is definitely the phone I want. What is this phone like compared to my rezound in terms of battery life, network speed, and performance?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
-Network Speed (For now)
+With Everything else
Probably the shortest & best way to describe that experience.
your speed is going to be heavily dependent on your location. Ive never used a rezound so I don't know what the difference will be, but the evo is a nice phone. Some minor annoyances, but if you can find a phone that doesn't have some let me know.
Going from a Rezound to an EVO 4G LTE you will experience:
-Much better, bigger screen
-Much faster
-Much better battery life
-Much thinner
-Much better camera
-Sense 4
-Terrible network speeds for a little while (unless you live in KC etc)
It's better in every way, besides the fact that Verizon is superior to Sprint in terms of service.
I have both phones. As stated network speed on Verizon is sick. And the rezound has great screen resolution but the evo is better in pretty much every way. Even the screen is better.the rezound feels like a brick In my hand. The battery life on the rezound is horrible.
If you can wait for the better network then get the evo
I love my shiny 4g iPhone!
You can always give sprint a 14day try to see how speeds are and what not. nd depending on your situation like if u have WiFi at work and home it may not matter to much about speeds.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
ckoadiyn said:
You can always give sprint a 14day try to see how speeds are and what not. nd depending on your situation like if u have WiFi at work and home it may not matter to much about speeds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And keep in mind you can just use the temp number sprint gives you for a week or so and then later port your number over from Verizon
It's rather silly to compare these two phones. I would ask any Sprint customers you know if they're pleased with their service. Also, if you don't qualify for a discount in any other way, get an account as a local credit union. I get 23% off on my bill for being part of a credit union.
This phone is godly. That is all
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
If you get lte you'll definitely regret it sprint 3G is slower then Verizon and most parts of the US the bill will come down tho, when I had Verizon and the amount of minutes I used to pay 170+ for two lines, it was unlimited data, sprint 3G wasn't as bad so I moved with my wife and we were paying 129$ at month big difference, if Tmobile had the evo I think it will be better at least till LTE rolls out I get up to 12-16 mbps on Tmobile but they do have some dead spots, att and Verizon have the next networks but they charged too much IMO, other then that the evo lte is my favorite phone I am getting the galaxy s 3 on Tmobile and most likely keeping my evo till their network could at least hit 5mbps cause I like that phone the much
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
You lose 720p slow motion, for what it's worth... haha.
brennen.exe said:
You lose 720p slow motion, for what it's worth... haha.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lmao
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Just remember boys and girls, if you know what you are doing, you can run your evo lte on verizon 3g with unlimited data and sprint pricing
Art2Fly said:
Just remember boys and girls, if you know what you are doing, you can run your evo lte on verizon 3g with unlimited data and sprint pricing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but their 3g ain't the mug better, their LTE would be amazing to do lol
Sent from my HTC VLE_U using Tapatalk 2
Just switched back to Sprint from Verizon on Launch day. EVO is awesome of course. I Luke it much better than the rrzound
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
jgalan14 said:
Yeah but their 3g ain't the mug better, their LTE would be amazing to do lol
Sent from my HTC VLE_U using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I'm not going to disagree with you because there are too many variables, but for me I get about 2mbps on verizon compared to my 200Kbps on sprint... so yeah, a lot better.
Art2Fly said:
Well I'm not going to disagree with you because there are too many variables, but for me I get about 2mbps on verizon compared to my 200Kbps on sprint... so yeah, a lot better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess it depends on where you located Verizon 3G in Las Vegas never impressed me as much as their 4g did but the thunderbolt sucked at the moment so I had to give it up after few months
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
reverepats said:
Just switched back to Sprint from Verizon on Launch day. EVO is awesome of course. I Luke it much better than the rrzound
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey me too . It's awesome
Sent from my EVO using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
Nevermind I didn't think it was that easy
Sent from my EVO using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
Related
Why should we get a sprint lte phone (next cycle) , when they are two years out from being turned on. Yes I know they are testing in some town with 10 residents (which none of them are probably sprint customers). I'm still waiting for 4G.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
babyschmoof said:
Why should we get a sprint lte phone (next cycle) , when they are two years out from being turned on. Yes I know they are testing in some town with 10 residents (which none of them are probably sprint customers). I'm still waiting for 4G.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe a better question...how about u just don't get it until u get 4G?
Sorry...don't wanna sound like a sh*ta** but yea...lol
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
Better hardware overall and all phones offerings are going to be 4G. So... Upgrade your phone or don't.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA
Personally I'm just buying a phone because I like it. I've had both evo 4g EVO 3d and both epics and am.still without 4g. I have got this far without its just a bonus to me if I ever do recieve lte. It's still the same price and my WiFi at home is better than 4g anyway. If you have stuck around this long no reason to jump ship now your halfway through the changeover
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
i work from home and am on wifi like 95% of my time, i do go to wimax areas every once in a while but but i can live without that. im buying it because 4.3" is too small for me lol
I don't use 4G as it is now so I could care less
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
It's hardware is far superior to any phone that is out or will be out for a while.
yousefak said:
It's hardware is far superior to any phone that is out or will be out for a while.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed and one of the reasons I got it. Would just like to be on the upside of phone tech for once. Never thought I would be jealous of AT & T.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
babyschmoof said:
Agreed and one of the reasons I got it. Would just like to be on the upside of phone tech for once. Never thought I would be jealous of AT & T.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol I may end up getting it when I am outta contract. Kinda wanna see what people think of it.. I don't care for the LTE or 4G just the specs are pretty nice no 3D which makes me happy just want my 8MP back so I can play with CM and other sense less builds.
The only reason I will eventually move to LTE (I'm already currently in a WiMAX area) is for the improved speeds and the lower frequencies. Lower frequency radio waves will better penetrate thick walls (like concrete) and will reduce how much battery it uses. Therefore, LTE is overall more stable than WiMAX technology.
Sent from my E3D
Nobody is forcing you to stay with Sprint. If you want 4g LTE now, switch to Verizon.
sitlet said:
Nobody is forcing you to stay with Sprint. If you want 4g LTE now, switch to Verizon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol he already bought one Anyway's think he is just asking a general question about what people think about it...
Verizon plans and phones are over priced Good service and everything else..
decayer177 said:
The only reason I will eventually move to LTE (I'm already currently in a WiMAX area) is for the improved speeds and the lower frequencies. Lower frequency radio waves will better penetrate thick walls (like concrete) and will reduce how much battery it uses. Therefore, LTE is overall more stable than WiMAX technology.
Sent from my E3D
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The big issue I see is a big price jump once lte is turned on. There is some serious traffic control that lte has that wimax doesn't. When they can truly see what being used and the rate of consumption, bye bye unlimited.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
babyschmoof said:
The big issue I see is a big price jump once lte is turned on. There is some serious traffic control that lte has that wimax doesn't. When they can truly see what being used and the rate of consumption, bye bye unlimited.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
though I do think there will be a day when unlimited will be no more, i don't think it will be anytime soon, for 2 reason, 1 the premium data fee ($10) we all pay according to dan hasse is the reason we don't have tier data plans already, so if they switched they can't charge that anymore and 2 sprint uses it too much to advertise with, and is a reason so many of the customers are staying... if they lose that they will lose A LOT of customers...
i never use 4g and i can get it almost all most all the time.. i use 3g cause its fast enough for me.. when i have used 4g in the past it just drains my battery to quick.. its crazy cause some people would love to get 4g and i have it and could care less.. lol i wish i could give it away!!!! to someone that would use it.. u kno..
evod3 said:
i never use 4g and i can get it almost all most all the time.. i use 3g cause its fast enough for me.. when i have used 4g in the past it just drains my battery to quick.. its crazy cause some people would love to get 4g and i have it and could care less.. lol i wish i could give it away!!!! to someone that would use it.. u kno..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My town doesnt have any 4g towers. What kind off BS is that? Hah
iTzLOLtrain said:
My town doesnt have any 4g towers. What kind off BS is that? Hah
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I only get to use it if I go to Atlanta or I go up north to Michigan
I am in no hurry to upgrade. I live in a small city about an hour north of Atlanta. My little city of 30k has WiMax and is set to get LTE the first round, but I get 4G inside my apartment and downtown. While I don't get LTE speeds, I do get around 7-8mb. And I'm okay with that till the next round of LTE phones come out. WiMax isn't going anywhere anytime soon for those of us that have it.
Sent from my iPhone with the bigger GeeBees.
point is there will always be a better fone :-/
reaper24 said:
I only get to use it if I go to Atlanta or I go up north to Michigan
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry that's the case. As a frequent traveler I am in almost always in Wimax coverage and have been very satisfied for the most part. However, thinking I'm hot s*?t pulling down 10mgbs on my couch always gets me into trouble as my buddy ( who is smartphone illiterate) pulls down 30 on his razr max. Yea at those speeds its basically just a pi$$ingcontest, but with almost 24 months on the competition you have to feel dissapointed in the way Wimax was.handled.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
So, for all of those lucky enough to receive the new EVO, what is your 3G speed. Post your speedtest screenshots and let us know what city you are in.
For the record, I didn't get one. :'(
iwalkthrowwalls said:
So, for all of those lucky enough to receive the new EVO, what is your 3G speed. Post your speedtest screenshots and let us know what city you are in.
For the record, I didn't get one. :'(
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some tests I ran between my 3D and LTE
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=26511061&postcount=2
I'd really like to see a comparison of WiMax speeds versus the 3G speeds of the LTEVO. I'm sure WiMax will still be faster, but I'm curious to see by how much.
Since I'm keeping my OG activated (for WiMax) until LTE is active in my area, it would be nice if the numbers were close enough for me to avoid having to carry around two phones for several months .
I'll post a speed test shortly
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
dagnasty said:
Some tests I ran between my 3D and LTE: Link to Post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow. That's ridiculous. I've read it is faster on 3G than other phones (namely the 3D), but I wonder if most zones will see that much improvement. Seems hard to believe.
Captain_Throwback said:
I'd really like to see a comparison of WiMax speeds versus the 3G speeds of the LTEVO. I'm sure WiMax will still be faster, but I'm curious to see by how much.
Since I'm keeping my OG activated (for WiMax) until LTE is active in my area, it would be nice if the numbers were close enough for me to avoid having to carry around two phones for several months .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3G for me on the LTE is between 500-700kbps while the unofficial 4G (not on Sprints map but shows on Clear's and connects as Sprint). I just ran my 3D on WiMax to Speedtest it. In my house with 1 bar of 4G and I got 5490kbps down. So you will probably want to carry 2 phones for a bit
I've done three speedtests and average 280 kbps down and 350 up here in Minneapolis with 1-3 bars in my apartment building.
Edit: though I did just get this...
My OG EVO, EVO 3D, and Epic 4G Touch have all had atrocious 3G speeds. Way below other carriers. This phone appears to have great 3G speeds (relatively), and my girlfriend's Sprint iPhone 4S also gets pretty good 3G speeds. I wouldn't be surprised if Sprint purposely throttles data from certain devices and allocates more data to others. Makes sense that they would want iPhone uses to have decent data, they don't have a 4G option. Similar to the EVO LTE, no LTE in the immediate future for most.
I bring this up because it's common knowledge that Sprint's 3G is absolutely garbage, when it fact it could be Sprint purposely throttling data. I wonder what would happen if they just opened up the pipes even to everyone.
Once NetworkVision upgrades are done all this will be moot....not worth fretting over now...
Comparing WiMax to the 3G speed is a pointless task as well, imho....different animals all together; and no phone is going to be faster than the another on 3G really in areas where the problem is capacity ridden issues...In areas its not, then you can see benefit/differences due to different antennae tech and radios used...
sgt. slaughter said:
Once NetworkVision upgrades are done all this will be moot....not worth fretting over now...
Comparing WiMax to the 3G speed is a pointless task as well, imho....different animals all together; and no phone is going to be faster than the another on 3G really in areas where the problem is capacity ridden issues...In areas its not, then you can see benefit/differences due to different antennae tech and radios used...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please don't dismiss this as not important, having usable 3g speeds until network vision comes out is important to many of us.We want this phone to succeed in all ways.
I haven't been able to test my speeds yet as it is taking forever (more than an hour so far) to download 6 apps over 3g. I screwed up and didn't test my OG Evo before I deactivated it, but it sure seems like the new lte Evo is a lot slower so far. I will update after it finally gets the speed test app downloaded.
Is the PRL different on all your evos??
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
huskers15 said:
Is the PRL different on all your evos??
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a screenshot from over on themikmik, which is definitely a different PRL than I have on my OG
I wonder if that's the reason. Didb try to update your prl on the og?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
huskers15 said:
I wonder if that's the reason. Didb try to update your prl on the og?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Latest update I have is 61087 (corporate account). Everyone else has 60687.
woody296 said:
Please don't dismiss this as not important, having usable 3g speeds until network vision comes out is important to many of us.We want this phone to succeed in all ways.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read what I wrote again...don't think u grasped what i was saying really....
Wasn't dismissing the importance of 3G speed as much as caring about the difference b/w what you got on your 3D and what you get now with the LTE...like I said no matter what phone you have the capacity troubled areas will continue to get slow speeds until NetworkVision is deployed in your area...Also its highly unlikely you will see a phone released that will get half the speed of its predecessor over 3G so there should be no worry really...b/c 90% any slow speed issues experienced here will be network related issues and not the phone...
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Captain_Throwback said:
Latest update I have is 61087 (corporate account). Everyone else has 60687.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its possible that prl is for lte
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
I'm getting around 300kb/s up and down around San Jose and the Oakland airport. I normally would get about 3000 with tmobile...
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Blue_Alien said:
I'm getting around 300kb/s up and down around San Jose and the Oakland airport. I normally would get about 3000 with tmobile...
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats with a totally different network
Sent from my Transformer
That's the same prl for the galaxy nexus....it's a lte prl ....
Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Nexus CDMA using Tapatalk 2
I really wanted to like the phone, but I ran into two issues.
a) my audio over bluetooth was terrible. Compared to the Photon that I was coming from, the calls were very choppy.
b) Reception... I spontaneously went to roaming mode in my office, where I have NEVER had reception issues. the same thing repeated itself on the freeway where Sprint has always had good coverage.
I'm sure it was probably just my handset, but with the SGS3 coming soon and my Photon still kicking like a champ, I took it back today, after just one day of use.
good luck everyone.
This reminds me that I've experienced the roaming issue. I have airave hooked up, so I thought it might have something to do with that; even though my NS4G and GS2 were fine in the same config.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Have fun, I think is funny cause this phone got better radios then my galaxy nexus sprint did, but I guess is not for everyone
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
jgalan14 said:
Have fun, I think is funny cause this phone got better radios then my galaxy nexus sprint did, but I guess is not for everyone
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will you quit buying phones....
Sent From My Sprint Galaxy Nexus via XDA Premium
ÜBER™ said:
Will you quit buying phones....
Sent From My Sprint Galaxy Nexus via XDA Premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For now yes
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
First issues and people are frantically returning there phones. The newer phones gnex EVO LTE, are gonna probably have more issues because of the new network vision rollout. Once that network is up and running, I'm certain it will succeed
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Going from a photon to a New EVO you would see a difference in coverage. The photon is awesome in the RF aspect.
I was able to compare my EVO LTE to an Epic yesterday in a fringe area. It seemed to be about the same.
Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge
digiblur said:
Going from a photon to a New EVO you would see a difference in coverage. The photon is awesome in the RF aspect.
I was able to compare my EVO LTE to an Epic yesterday in a fringe area. It seemed to be about the same.
Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My OG EVO had far better reception than my LTE Evo does. I roam at home where I didnt on my OG EVO
Edit: Not returning it though
94tbird said:
My OG EVO had far better reception than my LTE Evo does. I roam at home where I didnt on my OG EVO
Edit: Not returning it though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have acce ss to, at any given time, the OG Evo 4g, the Evo 3d, the Evo Shift, the ET4g, and now, the Evo 4g LTE. If I am having problems getting a signal somewhere, and absolutely NEED a signal, for some reason it's the Evo3d that never fails. I don't know what it is in the internals that causes it, but it's definitely true.
i think it would be pretty hard to make a decision to return a phone after one day.. but hey if you dont like it you dont like it..
You're generally right... However, going into roaming, in areas that I've used most phones in without incident, shows a clear issue that I won't risk dealing with.
I've already resigned to dealing with poor data speeds due to Sprint's network... Good calling should be a must for all phones.
Should I have expected the calling issues to go away by themselves?
Sent from my MB855 using XDA
So following in VZW footsteps, At&t now has shared data plans as well.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
merlin66676 said:
So following in VZW footsteps, At&t now has shared data plans as well.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think this really deserved its own thread... There is an off topic thread for a reason.
Not trying to be an ass or anything also, I'm sure most of us already knew this
Yep, difference is that they allow you to upgrade and keep your grandfathered plans (at least for now).
Just saw the commercial.
Well, looks like ill be going to sprint when my contract is over...
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
chrisjz said:
Well, looks like ill be going to sprint when my contract is over...
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Idk man. The unlimited 4G at T-Mobile looks nice when mine's up. Although, I'm trying to be hopeful that it will somehow encourage Verizon to rethink their stance because in terms of coverage in my area, no one comes close.
If you want to keep your unlimited plan just don't upgrade through Verizon. You can usually buy the newer phones on their networks for around $200 - $300 on eBay, swappa, craigslist, or amazon. Just pick up whatever phone you want and walk into Verizon and request a sim for the phone or have then program it.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
dogswind said:
Idk man. The unlimited 4G at T-Mobile looks nice when mine's up. Although, I'm trying to be hopeful that it will somehow encourage Verizon to rethink their stance because in terms of coverage in my area, no one comes close.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought about that to but doesn't T-Mobile throttle you after like 500mb though and force you on 3g or 2g for the remainder of the month? I think sprint is the only one that won't cut you off. For me if Verizon forces me off unlimited I think I'll stay cause nobody else has as good of service but sprint might be tempting.
Sent from my Sense 4 ICS Rezound
LakerStar25 said:
I thought about that to but doesn't T-Mobile throttle you after like 500mb though and force you on 3g or 2g for the remainder of the month? I think sprint is the only one that won't cut you off. For me if Verizon forces me off unlimited I think I'll stay cause nobody else has as good of service but sprint might be tempting.
Sent from my Sense 4 ICS Rezound
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The new plan going live on the 5th is being advertised as truly unlimited. No caps or throttling:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/21/t-mobile-leak-suggests-truly-unlimited-4g-data-add-on-launchin/
LakerStar25 said:
I thought about that to but doesn't T-Mobile throttle you after like 500mb though and force you on 3g or 2g for the remainder of the month? I think sprint is the only one that won't cut you off. For me if Verizon forces me off unlimited I think I'll stay cause nobody else has as good of service but sprint might be tempting.
Sent from my Sense 4 ICS Rezound
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sprint can't throttle you because if they slowed it down any more, it wouldnt even load the play store. It already took long enough to do that when I had sprint. I loved sprints customer service but their data network is awful, not to mention it will take them forever to roll out 4g. Verizon might cost more per month but it's worth it. Sprint has unlimited because their 3g is so slow you can't use a lot of data and their WiMAX is almost nonexistent unless you live in huge cities. Just warning you guys.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Evocm7 said:
Sprint can't throttle you because if they slowed it down any more, it wouldnt even load the play store. It already took long enough to do that when I had sprint. I loved sprints customer service but their data network is awful, not to mention it will take them forever to roll out 4g. Verizon might cost more per month but it's worth it. Sprint has unlimited because their 3g is so slow you can't use a lot of data and their WiMAX is almost nonexistent unless you live in huge cities. Just warning you guys.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stamp. So damn true about Sprint... Verizon is second worst on 3g though, to be fair. GSM has always trumped CDMA in the 3g department in my experience.
dogswind said:
The new plan going live on the 5th is being advertised as truly unlimited. No caps or throttling:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/21/t-mobile-leak-suggests-truly-unlimited-4g-data-add-on-launchin/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea looks good but their 4g isn't that good or as fast as lte and they won't have lte for a while and their service isn't great especially in my area. But in the next 5 years when everyone has lte it will be good to see them really compete for customers.
Sent from my Sense 4 ICS Rezound
Bonus is you can take the Rezound over to Tmo. They always have better android phones than vzw half the time anyway.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
AshtonTS said:
I don't think this really deserved its own thread... There is an off topic thread for a reason.
Not trying to be an ass or anything also, I'm sure most of us already knew this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is this not the general discussion board? Is this not a general discussion? For ****s sake...
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Phaded said:
Is this not the general discussion board? Is this not a general discussion? For ****s sake...
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Last I checked, I'm allowed to share my opinion without being called out
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
LakerStar25 said:
Yea looks good but their 4g isn't that good or as fast as lte and they won't have lte for a while and their service isn't great especially in my area. But in the next 5 years when everyone has lte it will be good to see them really compete for customers.
Sent from my Sense 4 ICS Rezound
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah they are behind. I have a long time on my contract though, so who knows by then.
dogswind said:
Stamp. So damn true about Sprint... Verizon is second worst on 3g though, to be fair. GSM has always trumped CDMA in the 3g department in my experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never had a phone on att that worked worth a damn (iPhone back when I didn't know how truely evil apple was) on 3g but I have seen others on att do well on 3g. But 3g works well for me on Verizon. I use it all the time since it doesn't hog battery like 4g which is great in my area. But when I'm running a speestest on 3g with my buddy and his HTC evo 3d next to me and I pull almost 2.0mbps down and 1 up and he barely pulls a .5 down and .1 up with his 400ms ping, Verizon's 3g is the **** lol. But you are right att 3g is better, their 4g is garbage through. Everyone i know barely pulls 7-8 down on att 4g while I'm flying by them at 40mbps while streaming Pandora in the background
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Yea I mean if atts service didn't literally make me mad, I would still use them just for the phones.. Verizon's is the only one I've had that I actually notice how good it is. The phones and the lock down aren't that great that ¦~\ but service is first and foremost. Plus on LTE I've never had lower than 11 down and 2 up (its usually over 15 and under 40 up, with over 5 down) and I've been across states down south in 4G areas... ATT and TMO and Sprint don't compare in places Ive been down here. Plus my 3G speeds are as fast and their 4G pretty often and that's unacceptable to me.
Pitty there isn't unlimited anymore and some gooder phones lulz
platinumrims said:
Pitty there isn't unlimited anymore and some gooder phones lulz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We can thank the bastards that have usenet accounts and use 50-100+gb per month for that one. It really is useless, they probably just have one for the sole purpose of racking up as much data as possible.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Evocm7 said:
We can thank the bastards that have usenet accounts and use 50-100+gb per month for that one. It really is useless, they probably just have one for the sole purpose of racking up as much data as possible.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't really think that's the reason... But I'm sure they considered that as well... I think it's because they own so much spectrum that they can increase the price of whatever they want and people will pay for it... Plus ATT started the teird data garbage. Verizon followed a year later... Then Verizon started the share plan garbage.. now ATT has followed that. It's all about money. Data used to be a lot cheaper once upon a time, but not as good persay.. Personally I think they should still have unlimited 4G and capped 3G or vice versa... Idk though... Meh it is what it is.
Folks, before I get flamed for posting that and before a Moderator closes my thread, please read what I have to say.
I live in Atlanta, where LTE supposedly is everywhere. Or so I thought "supposedly" when I had the Evo because ever since I got it, I've only seen it connected once(I thought maybe it just wasn't available yet.)
Then I thought maybe it was my phone since people were reporting getting 4G speeds a lot in Atlanta, so I argued my way into getting another one from Sprint. Same thing. Never connected.
Then I got myself a Galaxy Nexus. The phone was great (til I broke it) and it was always connected to 4G.
(I even made a thread about it here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1846041)
When my brother came to visit me, I even tested his Evo LTE. Same thing.
Then I broke my Galaxy Nexus and bought a Galaxy S III. To my surprise, it also always connected to 4G.
I went to Sprint and compared it to an Evo LTE to see if that one would connect. I checked the settings to make sure LTE is on and it still wouldn't connect.
Even my 3G speeds on the Samsung devices are better.
Thus, I learned so far that Samsung's antenna's are a LOT better than HTC antenna.
(FYI, I do not work or am endorsed by Samsung in any means. Matter of fact, I think their phones feel like cheap plastic pieces of sh*t and I wish I could have my HTC again (in working condition.))
Maybe we need to pressure HTC into putting in better antennas in our phones.
Are you sure you were on LTE on the Samsung phones? Correct me if I'm wrong but I think the EVOLTE is an LTE only phone and doesn't connect to Sprint's legacy 'faux-g' hspa network while I believe the Sammy phones do. My first Samsung phone was the intercept ( a miserable failure) and my second was the nexus s 4g(terrible reception but great phone). I've had much better luck with HTC phones when it comes to hardware.
I've only been to ATL once on a business trip and managed to connect to LTE before Sprint officially launched it so I was impressed
Edit: http://www.phonearena.com/phones/compare/HTC-EVO-4G-LTE,Samsung-Galaxy-S-III/phones/7019,6330
^Here is a decent source to prove it. I blame Sprint for being d***headed enough to insist on having an exclusive version of the One-X with features that didn't leave enough room for all the radios we need. They should have just taken the One-X as it was intended by HTC. Personally there us no 4g in my area at all so the Evo works fine picking up 3g
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
rubyknight said:
Are you sure you were on LTE on the Samsung phones? Correct me if I'm wrong but I think the EVOLTE is an LTE only phone and doesn't connect to Sprint's legacy 'faux-g' hspa network while I believe the Sammy phones do. My first Samsung phone was the intercept ( a miserable failure) and my second was the nexus s 4g(terrible reception but great phone). I've had much better luck with HTC phones when it comes to hardware.
I've only been to ATL once on a business trip and managed to connect to LTE before Sprint officially launched it so I was impressed
Edit: http://www.phonearena.com/phones/compare/HTC-EVO-4G-LTE,Samsung-Galaxy-S-III/phones/7019,6330
^Here is a decent source to prove it. I blame Sprint for being d***headed enough to insist on having an exclusive version of the One-X with features that didn't leave enough room for all the radios we need. They should have just taken the One-X as it was intended by HTC. Personally there us no 4g in my area at all so the Evo works fine picking up 3g
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see where you're coming from but yes these are both LTE.
Galaxy Nexus was Sprint's first LTE phone launched, then Evo and I believe then GS3.
And the speeds I'm getting (in good areas) are 20MB plus.
At work, I get a constant 3-5MB.
So I do not think it's T-Mobile's HSPA that I'm connecting to but actual LTE.
Even if it's true, false, or up for debate, you won't get a good discussion on it here.
I foresee posts about plastic phones, pentile screens, and TouchWiz.
arozer said:
I see where you're coming from but yes these are both LTE.
Galaxy Nexus was Sprint's first LTE phone launched, then Evo and I believe then GS3.
And the speeds I'm getting (in good areas) are 20MB plus.
At work, I get a constant 3-5MB.
So I do not think it's T-Mobile's HSPA that I'm connecting to but actual LTE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well the point is that I think Sprint has a bigger hspa footprint than LTE so you may be getting hspa and then LTE when you enter its range(thus the good 20mb spots). Even if the Samsung radio is slightly better you should still be able to connect on the Evo...
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
SoraX64 said:
Even if it's true, false, or up for debate, you won't get a good discussion on it here.
I foresee posts about plastic phones, pentile screens, and TouchWiz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know. I figured. I was think perhaps someone could come up with a better answer here. On Samsung section, I would only get things like "Yeah Samsung all the way!!!" Etc.
rubyknight said:
Well the point is that I think Sprint has a bigger hspa footprint than LTE so you may be getting hspa and then LTE when you enter its range(thus the good 20mb spots). Even if the Samsung radio is slightly better you should still be able to connect on the Evo...
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see what you're saying.
Also, I agree with the Evo should still be connecting. Not sure why it wasn't 3 Evo's at that.
(I tried all 3 different radios. Even lost my S-OFF and my Root in order to try the latest radio because I was that desperate for answers.)
Sprint doesn't have a hspa network. There are no phones that connect to Sprint’s previous 4G network (wimax) and their current 4G (LTE) network.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
newboyx said:
Sprint doesn't have a hspa+ network.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah that's what I thought too. Isn't T-Mobile the only one left with HSPA?
And honestly, Samsung vs. HTC aside, the problem is more on the carrier than HTC... Or both I guess. I used 2 friend's One X and GS3 next to each other in hspa+ 4G and they both were very close as far as load times. The GS3 person ended up swapping in her gs3 for the One X after seeing the software difference though Sprint just forced HTC to skimp on the radios with the extra evo features jammed in.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
arozer said:
Yeah that's what I thought too. Isn't T-Mobile the only one left with HSPA?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At&t uses a hspa+ network for 4G as well as LTE.
The connection issues are well documented and have been known to Sprint since at least April.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
newboyx said:
Sprint doesn't have a hspa network. There are no phones that connect to Sprint’s previous 4G network (wimax) and their current 4G (LTE) network.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I could be wrong then.. Whatever tech they used for their old fauxG is what I'm talking about. Is there really no phone that can use both?
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
I'm in dallas and my evo drops 4g left and right. Even when I find a strong siginal it switchs back to 3g. I'm currently lookin to sell mine an gettin a gs3 as I type this. It's bull**** payim 10$ extra for **** u can't use
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
newboyx said:
At&t uses a hspa+ network for 4G as well as LTE.
The connection issues are well documented and have been known to Sprint since at least April.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was not aware. It's not just signal issues. It's HTC signal issues, correct??
rubyknight said:
Well, I could be wrong then.. Whatever tech they used for their old fauxG is what I'm talking about. Is there really no phone that can use both?
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're talking WiMax.
And GS3 is not WiMax compatible.
sobaked2921 said:
I'm in dallas and my evo drops 4g left and right. Even when I find a strong siginal it switchs back to 3g. I'm currently lookin to sell mine an gettin a gs3 as I type this. It's bull**** payim 10$ extra for **** u can't use
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just be aware, on GS3 you'll still have to pay the $10 fee.
Only way you won't is if you switch to a non 4G WiMax or 4G LTE phone.
http://forums.androidcentral.com/sp...e-else-having-sprint-gs-iii-radio-issues.html
http://community.sprint.com/baw/thread/96470
http://community.sprint.com/baw/thread/92898
Honestly though, both phones are getting threads like this daily so I'm having a hard time believing any signal related complaints anymore.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Just be aware, on GS3 you'll still have to pay the $10 fee.
Only way you won't is if you switch to a non 4G WiMax or 4G LTE phone.[/QUOTE]
I know but at least ill get better connection as I impatiently wait for sprint to finish the LTE lol
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
I'm honestly torn between HTC and Samsung, sometimes. I love how an HTC phone feels in my hands, nice and solid. Sense looks good but can sometimes be a performance hog. Samsung does some pretty unique stuff to their devices (multiscreen, s-pen, etc) and I like that. I hate how the whole damn thing is just a bar of plastic, just don't like what it feels like compared to HTC. But software wise, Tocuhwiz isn't that bad, IMO. It's much closer to AOSP than any other OEMs version of Android.
But if you want a good read on the upcoming struggles with Samsung's Exynos-based devices, read this:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1922613&page=2
Start around post 16, some really good info from a CM dev. I like Samsung for always getting out their source early, but if it's broken and doesn't compile, then it doesn't matter. And if they can't help with any low level processor stuff because it's proprietary to them, they're not helping the community as much as they try to show that they are. Just my 2 cents.
Radio aside, how do you like the GS3 compared to the EVOLTE?
funcrusher said:
Radio aside, how do you like the GS3 compared to the EVOLTE?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't really wanna answer cuz I think you're a POS but no, I don't.
I wish I had my Evo back sometimes.
Very solid phone. GS3 freezes. My keyboard can't keep up with my typing and I end up with words like "whuoi dasu unjhoos" (this matters to me. I text a LOT.. like 500 or so texts per day.)
The speaker phones sounds terrible.
It's durable as a cold butter stick.
Feels very plastic-y.
However pros:
Service,
More developers available for it on XDA,
Very light.
arozer said:
Don't really wanna answer cuz I think you're a POS but no, I don't.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL!
I've actually come close to trading my EVO for a GS3 a couple times. No LTE here, so that's never factored in.
Basically 3 things have kept me from doing so:
1. People want way too much +$
2. Most that I've come across not in mint condition
3. I'm lazy
Oh, and also been trying to sell a car on CL, so haven't reposted my EVO for GS3 ad in awhile.
Doesn't most of the EVO's LTE connection problem stem from software? Bc last I heard the next ota is going to address it?
Personally, I won't have LTE for another few months at the earliest. So, it doesn't matter much to the majority of the US. Granted there are a lot of EVO users in the LTE startup cities. But does this mean a mass exodus from the EVO for 4g connectivity?
I can wait to see if an ota fixes the issues. I mean what are we gonna do, go to Verizon? Hahahaha.