Since we now have kernal source any of you's think. We will be getting an official cm base rom. Me particular. I like cm7 any ideas ?
justin lamantia said:
Since we now have kernal source any of you's think. We will be getting an official cm base rom. Me particular. I like cm7 any ideas ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM isn't supporting the msm8660 for cm7 that's why it took me so long to get it running and my cm9 will be merged once GSM is fixed
sportsstar89 said:
CM isn't supporting the msm8660 for cm7 that's why it took me so long to get it running and my cm9 will be merged once GSM is fixed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. Unfortunately I knew that I was hoping for some good neWS for cm7. Btw ur work isssss great.
Related
hi,
my first post in the go/sola/p/u forum. i really like the idea of a clean version of android without bloatware and the proprietary ui of the device manufacturers. so i was wondering if there is any rom based on cm10 or cm9 currently in the works for our devices?
srprashant91 said:
so i was wondering if there is any rom based on cm10 or cm9 currently in the works for our devices?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FXP is working on it. Check this page.
jsel said:
FXP is working on it. Check this page.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
waiting eagerly for a release. stock androids give the best user experience imo
Maybe is it real now?
I owuld appreciate to test it, but I don't know how, if it like AOKP or something like that.
http://get.cm/?device=umts_spyder
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Umts_spyder_Info
sound great!
but i think it just like the official AOKP
even though we have a good news again!
yyh2503 said:
sound great!
but i think it just like the official AOKP
even though we have a good news again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortnatly, I've tried to flash just like AOKP but it stucks in "booting..." (with the android and engines in the background)
I've not tried in slot 1, I'm little affraid installing into slot 1 and brick or something else
Sv: [rom][gsm] cm 10.1 official
There is already a thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2028020
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
guibovo said:
Maybe is it real now?
I owuld appreciate to test it, but I don't know how, if it like AOKP or something like that.
http://get.cm/?device=umts_spyder
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Umts_spyder_Info
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is because of Hashcode's hard work and extraordinary amount of input into the Unofficial CM10.1, I am sure he will make a new post himself. I dont think you meant to steal his glory tho.
BlueEditionE6 said:
This is because of Hashcode's hard work and extraordinary amount of input into the Unofficial CM10.1, I am sure he will make a new post himself. I dont think you meant to steal his glory tho.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uuh, sorry, I really did not see his post. ;$
My apologizes.
guibovo said:
Unfortnatly, I've tried to flash just like AOKP but it stucks in "booting..." (with the android and engines in the background)
I've not tried in slot 1, I'm little affraid installing into slot 1 and brick or something else
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you must be on a jb kernel....be careful with ics kernel,probably brick the device
Vallerino WR said:
I think you must be on a jb kernel....be careful with ics kernel,probably brick the device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's the opposite
Yes, it is, you must be on ICS kernel, that's the reason it has some bugs still, as BT one... IMHO
Enviado desde mi MOTOROLA RAZR usando Tapatalk 2
But I can ONLY install into sot_1?
Or are there a way to instal into slot_2?
Are there any problem installing in slot_1?
romdroid. said:
There is already a thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2028020
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're wrong, it's a unofficial release. The one in this topic is a Official Release from cryanogen team.
Installed using BMM in slot 2, with the "why_we_have_to_skip_devfs_setup_myth.zip" patch.
Works great! Camcorder working but still no flash with de camera.
Anárhér said:
You're wrong, it's a unofficial release. The one in this topic is a Official Release from cryanogen team.
Installed using BMM in slot 2, with the "why_we_have_to_skip_devfs_setup_myth.zip" patch.
Works great! Camcorder working but still no flash with de camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why the CM, and the AOKP are made in ICS Kernel? Why the developers don't use the JB Kernel of the leaked Verizon?? Something prevents it?
Maybe because it's not an official version (it's a leaked).
guibovo said:
Maybe is it real now?
I owuld appreciate to test it, but I don't know how, if it like AOKP or something like that.
http://get.cm/?device=umts_spyder
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Umts_spyder_Info
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's an image for download in the Nightly's session. You may download it and flash. That's all. I did it here through Safestrap 3.11 on Slot 1 and it wokred very well.
This ROM is awesome, but there still some artifacts and some other bugs known from AOKP.
But, for the whole thing, the system is sort of stable.
The official cm and aokp Roms are the same as Hashcode and Dhackers unofficial roms. The only difference is that we get updates directly from the aokp and cm teams now instead of Hashcode and Dhacker having to merge the changes from aokp and cm.
The official builds will stay on the ics kernel until the official jellybean build is released from Motorola. And probably will have to wait until Motorola releases the kernel source code.
Anárhér said:
You're wrong, it's a unofficial release. The one in this topic is a Official Release from cryanogen team.
Installed using BMM in slot 2, with the "why_we_have_to_skip_devfs_setup_myth.zip" patch.
Works great! Camcorder working but still no flash with de camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dude dont be stupid. its the same developer and the thread needs only to change the title to "official" from "unofficial" use common sense
I'm testing
I'm testing this rom since yesterday and it's very stable...
My razr has the ICS kernel, and I used Boot Manager on slot3 to test... Needed to patch devfs to boot..
The ROM is fast... but some old problems... like camera flash... the bluetooth I cant test since I dont have any BT devices...
Google now working... camera recording working... notification bar is the new 4.2.2 one
when flash camera is working it will be my default ROM...
awesome..
romdroid. said:
dude dont be stupid. its the same developer and the thread needs only to change the title to "official" from "unofficial" use common sense
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First, you need to be more polite with people you don't know. And second, despite the official build is only "cm" merged with hashcode's work it's still a new build since only now it will receive support from cyanogen team (not only about the razr port, which probably will continue to be hashcode's work, but about functionality, apps and more). But you're right, changing hashcode's thread title resolves, till he do that,it's the only thread that talk about the official release.
couillu44 said:
Maybe because it's not an official version (it's a leaked).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, but the ROM's make with the JB Kernel are very good and eliminate bugs such as camera flash and bluetooth.
>.< Is only for the JB kernel dude ? |
As stated in the cm 10.1 dev thread lets keep the general CM discussions here instead of cluttering the dev thread.
Great idea - now we can have all the misguided, misinformed speculation we want as to what hurdles have yet to be cleared before the DNA gets official CM nightly support
jk
Haha, exactly.
Actually, I think efforts might soon be underway to port straight AOSP as well I hope what I've heard (I can't give details, so please don't ask) comes to fruition.
That'd be great. I've been trying to learn more about programming and the build system so I can start helping out with some of it. I've setup ubuntu and sync and build cm every couple of days and I've been messing with building aokp since its based on cm.
AOKP, PA, PAC ROMs me want
Also some AOSP kernels as well
Sent from my TF300T using Tapatalk 2
I made a few changes and aokp started to build but I came across an error and haven't had time to look into it. If I get it built I'll try to learn some more about git and upload the source
skynet11 said:
Actually, I think efforts might soon be underway to port straight AOSP as well I hope what I've heard (I can't give details, so please don't ask) comes to fruition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why pure aosp as opposed to CM?
123421342 said:
Why pure aosp as opposed to CM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because a lot of popular ROMs out there are based on AOSP rather than on CM. Besides, there's always room for both right?
I'd love to try pure AOSP. I've always had HTC devices so I never got the pure Android experience.
123421342 said:
Why pure aosp as opposed to CM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because I want android and not all the stuff that comes with CM, if I want themes and mods ill do them myself
Does anyone have any resources that break down the build process?
I'm pretty excited for the 10.1 rom to become a daily driver. Once it's complete I hope to see possible other roms that are desensed... I'm sick of sense! I want some unadulterated android (or close to it)!
why would you want an aosp kernel? how are they better?
atishpatel2012 said:
why would you want an aosp kernel? how are they better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sense kernels won't work on aosp and the stock one they included in CM can't be overclocked or undervolted.
Nowak4G said:
Sense kernels won't work on aosp and the stock one they included in CM can't be overclocked or undervolted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel we are using right now is our stock kernel with cm commits. It doesn't include overclock or any other features because they could cause more bugs. Better to work all the bugs out of cm before you start doing things that could introduce more. Cplamer has already said that he has run a custom kernel with cm on his DNA so it is definitely going to happen. Just have to wait or build your own kernel unfortunately.
amathophobia said:
The kernel we are using right now is our stock kernel with cm commits. It doesn't include overclock or any other features because they could cause more bugs. Better to work all the bugs out of cm before you start doing things that could introduce more. Cplamer has already said that he has run a custom kernel with cm on his DNA so it is definitely going to happen. Just have to wait or build your own kernel unfortunately.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The other reason is because they're making so many changes to cm right now to get it working that a new kernel would have to be released for every update. I believe T1gartist has been running cm oc'd with a custom kernel as well
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
If you have the source it's not hard to add overclocking.
I'm not a dev or anything but I built AOKP
TheDanimal said:
I'm not a dev or anything but I built AOKP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can u upload the build.
I wud like to test it out.
What all features are working ? Are all" Whats Working" features CM10.1 working for it ?
Sorry for asking all these questions.
BTW, u should create a new thread in Orig. Android Dev. with AOKP build :victory:
Hello,
I just read that Cyanogenmod 10.1 is stable for some SII. However I don't see i777 in the list
Do you know whether will be a an stable version for it? or can I use the version for the others SII?
Thanks
All S2s are different
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
cabrerachaparro said:
Hello,
I just read that Cyanogenmod 10.1 is stable for some SII. However I don't see i777 in the list
Do you know whether will be a an stable version for it? or can I use the version for the others SII?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We probably won't be getting a stable build because we can never get H/W Composer to properly function. This doesnt pass stable requirements so we just get nightlies that are basically stable. Just read what people are saying about them and if it's good then go for it
It's official now. https://plus.google.com/+CyanogenMod/posts/2a8SiSZpxPn
i777 will be still getting nightly build but no stable.
Wing2468 said:
It's official now. https://plus.google.com/+CyanogenMod/posts/2a8SiSZpxPn
i777 will be still getting nightly build but no stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everyone knew that already
122ninjas said:
Everyone knew that already
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's true but the OP seems a little bit "lost"! :silly:
Wing2468 said:
That's true but the OP seems a little bit "lost"! :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you suggest to keep on ICS or JB would be better?
cabrerachaparro said:
Do you suggest to keep on ICS or JB would be better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That depends. For me, ICS (CM 9.1 9/16 nightly) worked great. After moved to JB (CM 10.1 6/26 nightly ATM), I don't think I would go back. Although some stuffs worked perfectly fine in ICS but had problems in JB (like TV out, wired/bt headset, etc.), I think I can live with that.
I'm now considering changing to 4.1.2 (either SHOstock3 or stock) to give it a try (I jumped from 4.0 to 4.2.)
I would highly suggest to go for a JB ROM that you like. From what I have read so far, CM would be a better choice at least for me. The only downside is we most likely will not get a stable 4.2.2 build in the foreseeable future!
Anyone know of any ICS or CM9 based roms that are still maintained? I've done a search and can't find anything.
I don't think the Jellbean roms run very well on this phone.
gneville said:
Anyone know of any ICS or CM9 based roms that are still maintained? I've done a search and can't find anything.
I don't think the Jellbean roms run very well on this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure about other custom ICS rom's but I'm sure CM9 is now just being maintained with security updates, no actual development work goes on by either the CM team or the device maintainers.
Mike.
Mcjim113 said:
Not sure about other custom ICS rom's but I'm sure CM9 is now just being maintained with security updates, no actual development work goes on by either the CM team or the device maintainers.
Mike.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess no..the link for cm 9 stable from get cm hasnt changed