Well, all the Sense 4 ROMs drain my battery like its nobody's business, and personally I really don't seem to like Sense anymore. I know that newtoroot came out with an AOSP rom awhile back in like February, but has anyone been working on one since? And I know people "claim" to have AOSP roms but all of them are still using sense's SystemUI, so im looking for a FULL AOSP rom. thanks to anyone who can help.
zZDave_Stud said:
Well, all the Sense 4 ROMs drain my battery like its nobody's business, and personally I really don't seem to like Sense anymore. I know that newtoroot came out with an AOSP rom awhile back in like February, but has anyone been working on one since? And I know people "claim" to have AOSP roms but all of them are still using sense's SystemUI, so im looking for a FULL AOSP rom. thanks to anyone who can help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since this is a pretty touchy subject... I'll handle it.
We do not have full functioning AOSP roms. The rezound has very difficult tech to reverse engineer. The AOSP roms that do exist all have no data, text, or call capability. Not even wifi. A few have tried to work on getting AOSP over but either stopped in the hopes that the ICS OTA stuff will help or they just dumped the rezound completely. I just hope you don't get flamed.
What hurts the rezound, was that everyone was expecting to get it and then immediately switch to ICS so the gingerbread development lacked a lot. And leaks don't really help us at all as far as ICS goes. Here we are 8 months after the debut of ICS and we are still left out in the cold.
There are a few people still trying to make AOSP happen, but for now, senseless is as close as you'll get.
bukithd said:
Since this is a pretty touchy subject... I'll handle it.
We do not have full functioning AOSP roms. The rezound has very difficult tech to reverse engineer. The AOSP roms that do exist all have no data, text, or call capability. Not even wifi. A few have tried to work on getting AOSP over but either stopped in the hopes that the ICS OTA stuff will help or they just dumped the rezound completely. I just hope you don't get flamed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not gonna get flamed. But newtoroots AOSP Rom was so close to perfect, ril worked, everything ran perfectly, except for a few bugs here and there. I would love if some awesome dev out there would take that Rom, fix it up, and put it on the forums. That's my two cents. Thanks for the feedback man.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
zZDave_Stud said:
I'm not gonna get flamed. But newtoroots AOSP Rom was so close to perfect, ril worked, everything ran perfectly, except for a few bugs here and there. I would love if some awesome dev out there would take that Rom, fix it up, and put it on the forums. That's my two cents. Thanks for the feedback man.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That wasn't aosp brohan. I reiterate, no aosp, only SENSELESS
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
I know but it actually used an AOSP SystemUI which is all that I really want. I can post pics if necessary (though it'll be hard on my phone lol)
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fix RIL would still be necessary for CM7 as it is for CM9. So given our most recent leaks/RUUs, makes since to focus on one vs. The other... Gingerbread is ooooooold
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the feedback man. And goodluck on your AOSP GB Rom man. And one quick question, (hope I don't sound like a noon) umm, who exactly is chad?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's interesting. I always just assumed everyone was so focused on ICS/CM9 that they just never bothered with CM7. I would probably use CM7 over our current crop of ICS choices to be honest.
zZDave_Stud said:
Thanks for the feedback man. And goodluck on your AOSP GB Rom man. And one quick question, (hope I don't sound like a noon) umm, who exactly is chad?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1437198&page=70 <<<< chad. Try to refrain from bugging him though, like I said, he is very busy.
fo0you said:
Fix RIL would still be necessary for CM7 as it is for CM9. So given our most recent leaks/RUUs, makes since to focus on one vs. The other... Gingerbread is ooooooold
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but it would be much much easier to fix because we has source. Chad even said that 99% of the issues is just rearranging libraries in the kernel.
dogswind said:
That's interesting. I always just assumed everyone was so focused on ICS/CM9 that they just never bothered with CM7. I would probably use CM7 over our current crop of ICS choices to be honest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would use CM7 over ICS sense as well. I believe a lot of users on here would feel the same.
Quada said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1437198&page=70 <<<< chad. Try to refrain from bugging him though, like I said, he is very busy.
Yes but it would be much much easier to fix because we has source. Chad even said that 99% of the issues is just rearranging libraries in the kernel.
I would use CM7 over ICS sense as well. I believe a lot of users on here would feel the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright thanks for letting me know who he was. So now, basically, Chads upcoming kernel will make all current AOSP roms a daily driver (with ril working)? Please tell me if this is incorrect. If its not then I'm actually kind of excited!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Quada said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1437198&page=70 <<<< chad. Try to refrain from bugging him though, like I said, he is very busy.
Yes but it would be much much easier to fix because we has source. Chad even said that 99% of the issues is just rearranging libraries in the kernel.
I would use CM7 over ICS sense as well. I believe a lot of users on here would feel the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yesss I'd love to have a cm7 . I actually just downgraded back to gb firmware
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
zZDave_Stud said:
Alright thanks for letting me know who he was. So now, basically, Chads upcoming kernel will make all current AOSP roms a daily driver (with ril working)? Please tell me if this is incorrect. If its not then I'm actually kind of excited!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no guarantee of him getting 3g/4g data working, but if he does then ICS AOSP roms will become a reality.
Quada said:
There is no guarantee of him getting 3g/4g data working, but if he does then ICS AOSP roms will become a reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright awesome, thanks for the replies everyone, I can't wait for chad's kernel. And I believe that atm I would use CM7 over the assortment of ics roms we have as well.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
zZDave_Stud said:
Alright thanks for letting me know who he was. So now, basically, Chads upcoming kernel will make all current AOSP roms a daily driver (with ril working)? Please tell me if this is incorrect. If its not then I'm actually kind of excited!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't hold my breath. Bottom line is that there has been no updates released to the "public" in a couple of months, just word of mouth that they have it working, except for a few bugs.
Quada said:
Let's not flame this guy. Let's turn this into a productive thread about AOSP even though we have scattered comments about AOSP/AOKP/CM in random threads.
Chad is working on RIL issues in his upcoming kernel. Chad is an extremely busy student so don't expect anything soon although he has gotten calls/sms/1x data working.
We really don't have an updated version of CM9 or AOKP but since we don't have data for them yet, there is no reason to make a ROM bot for them automatically compiling roms nightly.
OK now let's get productive. We have GB source. I don't understand why we don't have a CM7 rom yet. Well, I didn't understand why until I tried do compile/port one myself. I am not an expert at compiling from source especially when our device isn't officially supported but my port won't boot past the splash screen. I am thinking about putting the port up in the dev section and turning it into a community project. I have tried the Demonizing AOSP kernel and I have compiled multiple CM7 kernels from source but still no booting.
I know CM7 is GB based but it's better than nothing at least until we get ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think making it a community rom is a pretty good idea.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
zZDave_Stud said:
I know but it actually used an AOSP SystemUI which is all that I really want. I can post pics if necessary (though it'll be hard on my phone lol)
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If that's all you really need then use Slim or CleanRom DE. Slim especially has pretty much all of Sense stripped away either is worlds better for battery life.
Chad is doing what protekk couldnt do.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Newt is currently working on aokp. Says he has calls and texts working so far and next step is data.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Related
This is a modded version of Entropy's Hellraiser for Samsung-based roms.
This allows you to flash i9100 GSII roms based on AOSP (CM7, MIUI).
Flash ROM, then flash the hellraiser package via clockwork recovery.
All credits for this go to Entropy
Changes:
12/21/2011
Added Siyah 2.6 kernel for AT&T i777 GSII
Added KK6 modem
Removed nfc.apk
12/22/2011
Main package and modem flashed seperately (because I know no other way)
This is in testing phase only as of now.
USE AT YOUR OWN RISK
I am not responsible for damages done to your device for flashing this mod.
Download:
Flash 1st:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14624372/I9100_Hellraiser_Alpha0.3.1.zip
Flash 2nd:
http://db.tt/1ChH1dVo
i9100 CM7/MIUI ROM List:
GalnetMIUI/ICS Framework
Can't post, but it's out there in la la land...
WajkiUI
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1352386
HydroxygenMod
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1398628
NDT MIUI
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1307266
Evira MIUI:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1371553
SenseStyle CM7
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1324408
this is nice and all. but we have MIUI and CM7 without the need to hellraise bro.
task650 said:
this is nice and all. but we have MIUI and CM7 without the need to hellraise bro.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galnet MIUI, and there's a few CM7/MIUI roms for the i9100.
I could say the same for your ROM too. We already have samsung roms, no need to flash another soup variant. But, that wouldn't be nice.
come on guys....lets not start this thread in that manner...play nice.
Back on topic, thanks akira. I might give it a go. I've sorta wanted to try Galnet, but since they were kicked out, never had the chance.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Nice!! thank you
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Will a mod like this work on ICS based roms? Honestly im sticking to stock (works great unlike most androids lol) till I can get my hands on a ASOP ICS build.
sEnT fRoM mY ExYnOs PoWeReD MoNsTeR
mike21pr said:
Will a mod like this work on ICS based roms? Honestly im sticking to stock (works great unlike most androids lol) till I can get my hands on a ASOP ICS build.
sEnT fRoM mY ExYnOs PoWeReD MoNsTeR
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was just wondering this myself.
mike21pr said:
Will a mod like this work on ICS based roms? Honestly im sticking to stock (works great unlike most androids lol) till I can get my hands on a ASOP ICS build.
sEnT fRoM mY ExYnOs PoWeReD MoNsTeR
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately no. The ICS builds are using the 3.x kernel or a modified 2.6.x kernel. Siyah does not support ICS.
thank you so much for this!! i have been trying to hellraise cm7/miui roms from i9100. now u have made it possible. thank you!!
supercharged sgs2 i777 galnet rom/siyah kernel = beast
akira02rex said:
Unfortunately no. The ICS builds are using the 3.x kernel or a modified 2.6.x kernel. Siyah does not support ICS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But I would think that while this exact version may not be applicable, it is somewhat of a proof of concept that we could port CM9, which is nearing an early release
this.... is.. EXACTLY WHAT IVE BEEN WISHING FOR! SWEET!! THANKS YOUU
SupremeOverlord777 said:
But I would think that while this exact version may not be applicable, it is somewhat of a proof of concept that we could port CM9, which is nearing an early release
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well we know that we can port it, I don't think that there was any doubt about that
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
akira02rex said:
Galnet MIUI, and there's a few CM7/MIUI roms for the i9100.
I could say the same for your ROM too. We already have samsung roms, no need to flash another soup variant. But, that wouldn't be nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Umm... I ported Galnet MIUI for Galnet and ltldevil. You can read the announcement over there or ask Galnet himself. So.... i'm thinking you are incorrect. Im not trying to start a war here. im just stating a fact. this is very nice of you to do and im sure others will like it bro.
to make a point. i never discredited what you are doing. i love seeing anyone contribute here at XDA. so im not sure why it seems like you took it personal. or at least thats what i'm seeing. i was stating a fact that we have cm7, we have miui, and i ported Galnet miui already and they have released it.
akira02rex said:
Unfortunately no. The ICS builds are using the 3.x kernel or a modified 2.6.x kernel. Siyah does not support ICS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you could go ahead and make that work that'd be great. Mmmkay?
task650 said:
Umm... I ported Galnet MIUI for Galnet and ltldevil. You can read the announcement over there or ask Galnet himself. So.... i'm thinking you are incorrect. Im not trying to start a war here. im just stating a fact.
to make a point. i never discredited what you are doing. i love seeing anyone contribute here at XDA. so im not sure why it seems like you took it personal. or at least thats what i'm seeing. i was stating a fact that we have cm7, we have miui, and i ported Galnet miui already and they have released it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries.
task650 said:
Umm... I ported Galnet MIUI for Galnet and ltldevil. You can read the announcement over there or ask Galnet himself. So.... i'm thinking you are incorrect. Im not trying to start a war here. im just stating a fact. this is very nice of you to do.
to make a point. i never discredited what you are doing. i love seeing anyone contribute here at XDA. so im not sure why it seems like you took it personal. or at least thats what i'm seeing. i was stating a fact that we have cm7, we have miui, and i ported Galnet miui already and they have released it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see it on their website under downloads? It says coming soon!
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
dahlem said:
I don't see it on their website under downloads? It says coming soon!
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah they just got done doing a ton of maintenance to their site. everything should be back up shortly bro.
Cool saw on their site the other day that you ported it just been waiting patiently!
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
why did you pull the hellraiser? just got home to use it =\
Demonizing Kernelz
These are the first Kernels I have ever built so go easy on me. There are two versions AOSP GB and AOSP ICS. Currently there is no major modifications, as I get more experience I will start posting change logs and upload source code. For now we will keep all discussion in the thread. Please report any problems, or concerns. As of now I will only be uploading the zImage.
GB Beta: GB KERNEL
ICS Sense Beta: See Scroslers ROM ICS Kernel
ICS AOSP ALPHA: ALPHA
ICS ALPHA PROBLEMS: Well as with all alpha status kernels, I would not recommend daily use. Its a work in progress! Stay Posted for updates.
NO DATA
NO WIFI
NO ADB
NO USB MOUNTING
Awesome dude, you're the first to have an AOSP kernel for us. To bad we don't have a rom for it, but hey, progress is progress
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
yeah been up all night messing with it and finally got it to compile. Well right now I'm working on porting an ICS ROM so we shall see how it goes.
Hit up droid vicious, he has an MIUI port he could test with
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
antispiral said:
.............
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'll be thanking me when you have ICS on your Rezound.
Personally can't wait to see some AOSP on this phone.
This is awesome. I have been getting discouraged by not having any updates on AOSP progress lately.
Is it an ICS kernel or gingerbread?
I would be ecstatic with a CM7 port right now.
x3demond3x said:
Ok so iI built a KANG of the Tiamat AOSP Kernel for the Rezound. I am taking no credit. All credit goes to TIAMAT.
I am not sure this works, again this is AOSP so it has to be tested with an AOSP Port. If anyone has one please contact me for testing.
Thank You
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can I get a link? I have several aosp ports in the works
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk
A link would be nice, if you believe its presentable in your opinion
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
please post
please! post that stuff sos we can get some NON-Sense roms flowing!!!
I have been working on my own CM7 port so tonight I'll throw this in and see what happens
Been waiting for an AOSP kernel. I have been trying to compile my own but still don't know what I'm doing yet...
a.mcdear said:
I have been working on my own CM7 port so tonight I'll throw this in and see what happens
Been waiting for an AOSP kernel. I have been trying to compile my own but still don't know what I'm doing yet...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If anyone has an AOSP, CM7 or (preferably) a CM9 ROM built and wants a tester for the ROM/kernel combination send me a PM with the info/links.
Deathbyfugu said:
If anyone has an AOSP, CM7 or (preferably) a CM9 ROM built and wants a tester for the ROM/kernel combination send me a PM with the info/links.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I, like countless others, would also be willing to test, I'm sure.... Thanks for all the work!
FYI The only changes that need to be made for aosp are a few things for the touchscreen and to use the aosp WiFi module instead of htcs. Theres nothing that that should have prevented someone from booting aosp with the stock kernel... They just wouldn't have touch initially, which as a five minute fix. I also wouldn't use this kernel as the base for an aosp build since its highly modified and it will be difficult to separate kernel issues from ROM issues. I'll build a completely stock kernel with just the aosp changes later, if that's what's been holding everyone up.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
I just want an aosp rom idc who makes the kernel!
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
I check 20 times a day for an aosp Rom. Thanks Chad!!
chad0989 said:
FYI The only changes that need to be made for aosp are a few things for the touchscreen and to use the aosp WiFi module instead of htcs. Theres nothing that that should have prevented someone from booting aosp with the stock kernel... They just wouldn't have touch initially, which as a five minute fix. I also wouldn't use this kernel as the base for an aosp build since its highly modified and it will be difficult to separate kernel issues from ROM issues. I'll build a completely stock kernel with just the aosp changes later, if that's what's been holding everyone up.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
chad0989 said:
FYI The only changes that need to be made for aosp are a few things for the touchscreen and to use the aosp WiFi module instead of htcs. Theres nothing that that should have prevented someone from booting aosp with the stock kernel... They just wouldn't have touch initially, which as a five minute fix. I also wouldn't use this kernel as the base for an aosp build since its highly modified and it will be difficult to separate kernel issues from ROM issues. I'll build a completely stock kernel with just the aosp changes later, if that's what's been holding everyone up.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got this phone JUST YESTERDAY in the hopes that AOSP would follow shortly, so all of this news is going to give me an Androrgasm, srsly
chad0989 said:
FYI The only changes that need to be made for aosp are a few things for the touchscreen and to use the aosp WiFi module instead of htcs. Theres nothing that that should have prevented someone from booting aosp with the stock kernel... They just wouldn't have touch initially, which as a five minute fix. I also wouldn't use this kernel as the base for an aosp build since its highly modified and it will be difficult to separate kernel issues from ROM issues. I'll build a completely stock kernel with just the aosp changes later, if that's what's been holding everyone up.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From the changes I made, it looked to me as if it was completely stock with AOSP changes. Tiamat hasn't made this official so there is very few or no modifications. But man I wish I would of asked! This thing was a pain!
x3demond3x said:
From the changes I made, it looked to me as if it was completely stock with AOSP changes. Tiamat hasn't made this official so there is very few or no modifications. But man I wish I would of asked! This thing was a pain!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where did you pull the source from? You said Tiamat so I assumed you used their 8x60 Tiamat source as the base.
http://git.tiamat-dev.com/8x60/htc-kernel-msm8x60/
If you used the vigor branch it looks like they haven't done anything at all to it yet so it may just be fine. But in that case I would remove Tiamat kang from the title since you didn't kang anything from them if you made all the changes yourself... Haha.
Edit, I see where you pulled from, it looks like they started a new branch:
http://git.tiamat-dev.com/8x60/tiamat-kernel
It may or may not work, it doesn't look like they've made too many changes to it but its using the ruby kernel as the base with vigor files added to it, I still say it would be best to use the kernel straight from htc with just the changes for AOSP added.
I'm currently on ICScrewed 2.1 right now but i'm considering upgrading my phone to
ICS roms. However, there are two major choices right now: CM9 and AOSP
what is the difference between these two setup?
What exactly is the advantage of CM9 over AOSP or the other way around?
Are there any bugs that exist in these Roms?
just wanna clarify things a little bit
honghsien5 said:
I'm currently on ICScrewed 2.1 right now but i'm considering upgrading my phone to
ICS roms. However, there are two major choices right now: CM9 and AOSP
what is the difference between these two setup?
What exactly is the advantage of CM9 over AOSP or the other way around?
Are there any bugs that exist in these Roms?
just wanna clarify things a little bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look in ported development forum and check the respective Roms thread. Then READ them both so YOU can make a better decision of whats right for YOU.
CM9 is an AOSP ROM
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Just flash them both and find out for yourself.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Well right now IMO the aokp and current cm9 builds are very similar since cm9 doesn't have a lot of the tweaks
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
don't do it I wasted my whole Saturday morning on those ics things in ported section
I recommend the AOKP build by Fenny in Ported Development. I love the rom and have been getting great battery life. I mostly use my phone for email, text and social networking and have no complaints nor have found any bugs.
I've tried them both. CM9 is easier, AOKP has more stuff. Best to look at the threads if you want to know how it matters for what you care about.
They are both very similar and you will be fine with either.
why has this q been in the general all day? red your starting to slack a bit haha im just kidding. its saturday woo hoo!
Things aren't quite ready yet... give it another day or two, the floodgates will open soon.
I've been on fennys aokp all day and I'm loving it. Just video recorder doesn't work and right now I'm just trying to figure out how to get pics to save to external memory . But its super fast and the features are awesome especially the ocing and uving built in. I've been playing with face unlock it fun. Camera is better and faster than gb.
Haven't tried cm9
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I personal like AOKP. and I am a big CM fan. I've used CM9(altough I have tried CM9 since the 3/14/12 nightly) and AOKP sims alot nicer.
D/Ling the lastest CM9 now give it a try
Hands down no questions asked I gave been up and down both rims and aokp is better a lot more features and settings
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-4
With all the kernels and releases coming out, what is the general consensus on when ICS ROMs will be considered stable or feature-complete?
Was the recent i777 leak what developers were looking for to complete/optimize ICS ROMs? Or are we still waiting on i777 kernel source? Is Entropy's kernel a long-term solution?
Just wondering when to flash.
Thanks forum.
joebobjoe said:
With all the kernels and releases coming out, what is the general consensus on when ICS ROMs will be considered stable or feature-complete?
Was the recent i777 leak what developers were looking for to complete/optimize ICS ROMs? Or are we still waiting on i777 kernel source? Is Entropy's kernel a long-term solution?
Just wondering when to flash.
Thanks forum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would say we already have some stable ics roms like aokp and shomans rom and a few others im running ics now its perfect
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
But I remember being schooled about "oh we need i777 kernel source before we get ICS" whenever I inquired. We don't seem to have i777 source, but i9000 is good enough?
Let me rephrase my question, how much better will the current ROMs get when i777 kernel source is released? Will we see an AOSP ROM?
ymcmbforever said:
I would say we already have some stable ics roms like aokp and shomans rom and a few others im running ics now its perfect
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
joebobjoe said:
But I remember being schooled about "oh we need i777 kernel source before we get ICS" whenever I inquired. We don't seem to have i777 source, but i9000 is good enough?
Let me rephrase my question, how much better will the current ROMs get when i777 kernel source is released? Will we see an AOSP ROM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I honestly doubt the i777 kernel source will affect us whatsoever unless of coarse some type of nfc is included
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
I have yet to find a single bug running Shoman's rom. Your mileage may vary, read the thread et cetera but if you're asking when to flash I'd just go for it.
+1 on Shoman's ICS rom. It has operated flawlessly for me.
I9100 source is what we needed. We're only a little bit behind I9100 now. I9100 ICS has some nasty stability problems, I'm hoping to fix them before releasing DD for ICS. I'm working with gokhanmoral and a few others on it, it's not I777 unique.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
SHOstock ICS rom is amazingly stable and already in 5th release with more on the way
CM9 now has nightly builds for I-777. I fell in love with CM7 and am really liking the official CM9 nighty builds so far.
ICS leak
The ICS i777 leak, which has been bundled as a cwm zip without bootloaders
is working good for me with only a few minor bugs
alarms not working
wifi only scans after toggle
battery stats graph crashes
I don't know how this compares to i9100, the ICS leak is the first I've tried.
It's stable enough for me to not look back and stick with ICS
I'd definitely recommend SHOstock2, it's head and shoulders above the ATT leak in a lot of ways and I haven't had a single crash or noticed any bugs since installing RC4.
hbar said:
I'd definitely recommend SHOstock2, it's head and shoulders above the ATT leak in a lot of ways and I haven't had a single crash or noticed any bugs since installing RC4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with the uclc2 leak, I had the following issues: Titanium Backup would not install any of my games+data and 1/2 my apps would not install. From what I could tell were any of the apps and games that I had moved over to sd card would not be restored under the leak. Than all of a sudden, my phone had locked up after getting most of my apps *from the batch restore missing apps and data* and quit even getting service when wifi was on and try to turn off wifi = lockup/reboot. Really weird after 4 hours of running it. Under SHOstock2 Rc4 everything restored properly and even upgrading to rc5 which gave back the multi toggle options and running very stable. Zero issue with it.
HTH,
Charlie
I've been running LilChris's phone-bricker with zero problems. Restored apps and data using tibu. Fast and smooth.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA
Been running the AOKP build from Ported Dev thread with no major problems. Only problem is that when I am listening to music and a text or notification comes in, the music volume is lowered by 2 notches, then when I try to turn it up it goes by about 3 notches. Its a balancing act to get the volume back. Thats my only grippe. I havent had much time to read so I dont know if the newer ICS roms have fixed that issue.
It seems like all the ROMs have a few little glitches. Is there an ICS ROM that can record video at 1080p? Or connect to a 5GHz AP? Or has HDMI/MHL functionality?
I'm switching to the first one that does all 3. I'd be really excited if we can get NFC too.
Entropy512 said:
I9100 source is what we needed. We're only a little bit behind I9100 now. I9100 ICS has some nasty stability problems, I'm hoping to fix them before releasing DD for ICS. I'm working with gokhanmoral and a few others on it, it's not I777 unique.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what gets me excited. It's always great to hear that developers from the android community are working together to bring exciting features to our phones. Thanks for all of your hardwork. I wish I would have stayed a computer engineering in college so I could help out, but it you all need testers let me know.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
ferrocene said:
It seems like all the ROMs have a few little glitches. Is there an ICS ROM that can record video at 1080p? Or connect to a 5GHz AP? Or has HDMI/MHL functionality?
I'm switching to the first one that does all 3. I'd be really excited if we can get NFC too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try lp3 stock from i9100 forum.. Flash with mobil odin but make sure in same flash you use entropy kernel and one of are modems. Then switch usr touchkey file.. Instructions in port section for file.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-2
So, uh, whats the point of this thread? Why do we need another ICS thread? If this is truly different than the main ICS thread then it can stay open, but from what im reading, its not.
Red5 said:
So, uh, whats the point of this thread? Why do we need another ICS thread? If this is truly different than the main ICS thread then it can stay open, but from what im reading, its not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I now see why the mods are so close-happy in this sub-forum. I'm sorry, I didn't mean to invoke a flood of ROM-reviews by starting this thread. All I had wanted was a general outlook of ROM-stability coming from official leaks and releases.
Was gonna wait for the official ICS update for the thunderbolt but after 4months and numerous rumors not panning out im going to root and flash a rom any suggestions for the best daily driver ????
But browsing and reading up a little but still confused on whats available??? Would love to try jelly bean but i can settle for ICS
Battery life, speed and stability are the important points for a daily driver
Whats you suggestions????
I know I'm gonna regret it as soon as i root and flash the official update will probably come out but i remember when i first rooted my OG droid I never went back so what you guys suggest??? also next upgrade will probably be taking the nexus 4 to straight talk but wanna get a few more months out of my Thunderbolt u would think HTC would want to keep the customers that run out and bought the first 4G device but i guess all they really care about is our money.
Rpatton said:
Was gonna wait for the official ICS update for the thunderbolt but after 4months and numerous rumors not panning out im going to root and flash a rom any suggestions for the best daily driver ????
But browsing and reading up a little but still confused on whats available??? Would love to try jelly bean but i can settle for ICS
Battery life, speed and stability are the important points for a daily driver
Whats you suggestions????
I know I'm gonna regret it as soon as i root and flash the official update will probably come out but i remember when i first rooted my OG droid I never went back so what you guys suggest??? also next upgrade will probably be taking the nexus 4 to straight talk but wanna get a few more months out of my Thunderbolt u would think HTC would want to keep the customers that run out and bought the first 4G device but i guess all they really care about is our money.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're looking for an ICS build there really is no amazing one yet, but Liquid's is the best you will find with Nusense a close second. My personal recommendation for a daily driver though is Thundershed, or any of the roms from reds. I am running ikream nosense and enjoy it a bit. There is also the sense based offering of it both are pretty nice. Depending on what rom you go with there are kernels and things like that to pick up from there.
If you want something bug free i recommend Skyraider zeus 1.3. Thats what im using with the lean kernel. Its very smooth. Plus there is a sweet ics theme for it. Throw in halo launcher aswell and you pretty much have the complete look and feel of ics and bug free. Everything works perfect on this rom
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
bigligg said:
If you want something bug free i recommend Skyraider zeus 1.3. Thats what im using with the lean kernel. Its very smooth. Plus there is a sweet ics theme for it. Throw in halo launcher aswell and you pretty much have the complete look and feel of ics and bug free. Everything works perfect on this rom
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Skyraider always bootlooped or the radios were horrid and drew no signal for me for no reason even after clean flashing so I swapped over to the ikream ones personally
binkies said:
Skyraider always bootlooped or the radios were horrid and drew no signal for me for no reason even after clean flashing so I swapped over to the ikream ones personally
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats odd. I've used it for a long time with no issues. I use the .19 radio with it.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
bigligg said:
Thats odd. I've used it for a long time with no issues. I use the .19 radio with it.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As was I. I just assumed my phone had aids though since it sees to work quite well for a lot of users
Proving again that all Thunderbolts are different, don't know why, but each responds differently to different ROMS.
To the OP, remember! Flashing is cheap, don't hesitate to try several ROMs before deciding on one you like.
I lean toward the NuSense but battery life isn't quite what I need... <sigh>
Another hearty recommendation for SkyRaider 1.3.
I've been evaluating lots of other ROMs and radio combos. Nothing has been as solid a daily driver as SkyRaider Zeus.
I'm really working at using Twisted's AOKP ICS, but my Bolt doesn't love it. I keep getting data hangs, and have to reset the radios via Airplane mode off/on.
And the leaked Sense ICS was way too battery hungry for me.
BoulderGeek said:
Another hearty recommendation for SkyRaider 1.3.
I've been evaluating lots of other ROMs and radio combos. Nothing has been as solid a daily driver as SkyRaider Zeus.
I'm really working at using Twisted's AOKP ICS, but my Bolt doesn't love it. I keep getting data hangs, and have to reset the radios via Airplane mode off/on.
And the leaked Sense ICS was way too battery hungry for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been running on Sky Raider and once I got the right radio, I had no issues. Pretty solid
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using xda app-developers app
LiquidSmooth 3.2:good: with the .19 radio. It has been my daily driver for almost a year now. Way better than any current ICS rom for the mecha. No problems, everything works. And it all works plenty fast enough.
If you really want a solid ROM with everything working great, Sky Raider is excellent. Especially since I like having a good camera and video camera. Nice to have everything work perfectly. I love AOSP, it is very fast, but you don't get the same functionality (dont get me wrong it is very close, but small things like camera are just not quite as good) you do with Sense. I hate sense but skyraider really is a great ROM
ph19971207 said:
LiquidSmooth 3.2:good: with the .19 radio. It has been my daily driver for almost a year now. Way better than any current ICS rom for the mecha. No problems, everything works. And it all works plenty fast enough.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wanted to check that out. Cant find a working link
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
bigligg said:
I wanted to check that out. Cant find a working link
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I sent you a private message with the link. Not sure if I am allowed to post it in the forum. If anyone else needs it just PM me.
You should check out Twisted's new rom. I haven't had any problems with it and it's the smoothest rom I've had in awhile.
So can anyone give me a rundown on the differences on these ROM's? I've seen Liquid 3.2, Thundershed, and Skyraider mentioned here. Which are Sense based and which are AOSP. Are the Sense based Rom's laggy? I've tried NuSense, and it was a nice ROM, but just too laggy for my taste. I've tried Jesters and Twisted's 11-7 version of Liquids ICS ROM, and they've been great, but I'm having too many bluetooth issues which will interfere with work so it's a no go if I can't simply turn on the bluetooth and let it connect.
I understand flashing is supposed to be quick and easy so just try them all, but it seems to take me several hours to get everything backed up, flashed, and put back the way I like it. Any input would be greatly appreciated.
F350-6 said:
So can anyone give me a rundown on the differences on these ROM's? I've seen Liquid 3.2, Thundershed, and Skyraider mentioned here. Which are Sense based and which are AOSP. Are the Sense based Rom's laggy? .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have only used LiquidSmooth 3.2. It is a Gingerbread AOSP. Any Sense ROM tends to be very laggy on either of my Thunderbolts. And all of the ICS ROM's seem to have at least one problem or another that keeps it from being my daily driver(bluetooth, wifi, camera or camcorder especially!)
It all depends on what you can and can't live without on a DD. Most of the Gingerbread ROMS's shouldn't have many, if any, issues. Some may be slightly slower than others and look different but all should make a good DD. The current ICS ROM's for the mecha are extremely fast, but usually lack in the camcorder or wifi department.
This thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1905083 has most of the ROM's linked(except LiquidSmooth3.2 Not sure why all the links to it were removed, Liquid is the Man tho and gotta respect his decision)
ph19971207 said:
I have only used LiquidSmooth 3.2. It is a Gingerbread AOSP. Any Sense ROM tends to be very laggy on either of my Thunderbolts. And all of the ICS ROM's seem to have at least one problem or another that keeps it from being my daily driver(bluetooth, wifi, camera or camcorder especially!)
It all depends on what you can and can't live without on a DD. Most of the Gingerbread ROMS's shouldn't have many, if any, issues. Some may be slightly slower than others and look different but all should make a good DD. The current ICS ROM's for the mecha are extremely fast, but usually lack in the camcorder or wifi department.
This thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1905083 has most of the ROM's linked(except LiquidSmooth3.2 Not sure why all the links to it were removed, Liquid is the Man tho and gotta respect his decision)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I found basically all sense roms to be laggy except for Skyraider. I'd recommend it to anyone.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Bamf forever 1.10 or 1.11 or Skyraider? I cant find any of them all the links are broken If you can post a link or PM me a link to it other than the teambamf.net site cause it doesnt work that would be awesome.