Cm9 Source Code Depends On Sgs2 Hardware? - Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Hi,
I'm currently trying to find out what parts of Android are hardware dependent and which are not. My target device is a Samsung Galaxy S2. I searched for a way to compile Android from source for the SGS2 and found a Cyanogenmod wiki page which describes how to compile cyanogenmod 9 for my device.
This has worked for me fine. I compared the output with a build from the AOSP source code and have some questions concerning this:
1. There are quite some differences in comparison with the AOSP Source. Is this code adjusted to the SGS2 (excluding the device directory)?
2. Has the code for the libskia.so been patched? I tried to compile it from AOSP but I got missing functions for (I think) hardware stuff.
3. If the cyanogenmod sourcecode has been patched,is there anywhere an overview about all applied patches in cyanogenmod (e.g. as a patch file)?
4. How do you got this SGS2 device directory? Official Samsung source?
Regards
Klaus

Related

Forking and porting CM7 to an unsupported device? (Gio GT-S5660M)

Hello,
So far, I have:
A working Android build environment (Ubuntu 11.10 x64).
Managed to build, install and boot AOSP on my Nexus S. (I have downloaded but not attempted to build CM7 yet.)
Created a Github account.
Samsung's open source files for my target device, the Galaxy Gio GT-S5660M.
I've read some documentation and forum posts about Github, but I remain unsure as to what I should do to fork in a way that:
I'll be able to keep on syncing the remainder of the code.
My new device directories and modifications could be brought back (pulled?) to the main CM7 code base.
Will avoid needless frustrating re-downloads of the source code.
Thanks in advance,
Darkshado
After some further reading, I'm beginning to grasp some git basics...
I've forked two CM7 repos so far, added them as remotes in the appropriate installations. (Instead of forking and cloning, since I already had repo sync'ed the whole CM7 source. My commits show up on Github like they should, and I should be able to merge in commits to the origin remotes.)
I'm not going to do any pull requests until I've managed to build and boot.
By the way, yesterday I attempted to build AOSP with a bunch of files overwritten by the Samsung sources (that's how they tell you to do it!!) and this failed, as I expected.
Goodbye,
Darkshado
Update: I'm currently trying to port CM7 to the Gio 5660M. Still attempting a first successful build as I'm writing these lines.
My main issue so far has to do with the camera. I get the following error message:
make: *** No rule to make target « out/target/product/gio5660M/obj/lib/libcamera.so », needed by « out/target/product/gio5660M/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/libcameraservice_intermediates/LINKED/libcameraservice.so ». Stop.
After toggling off the camera by using the stub, I hit the same error further into the build with this:
make: *** No rule to make target « vendor/samsung/gio5660M/proprietary/wifi/ath6k/AR6003/hw2.0/athtcmd_ram.bin », needed by « out/target/product/gio5660M/system/wifi/ath6k/AR6003/hw2.0/athtcmd_ram.bin ». Stop.
I know this has to do with makefiles, but that's about it...
Thanks in advance for any help,
Darkshado
hi i'm interested too.
hi I found your github because I also interested poriting cyanogemod to galaxy gio korea(SHW-M290K). the device hardware is different from s5660. so I need some modification.
and your libcamera problem is that there is some reason that the make system can't find libcamera.so, so they cannot compile libcamera service. it should be in ./vendor/samsung/gio/proprietary according to your extract-files.sh .
have one cuorisity. I searched gio android device make file. and none of them are relreased source code. how did you make them?
I found this information. it may help you.
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/TI-Android-GingerBread-2.3.4-DevKit-2.1_PortingGuides
I'll have to update my Github, hadn't been in a rush due to lack of progress, but now my problem lies with libaudio instead.
I got the Samsung sources for the 5660M on their open source website, although I mostly worked with the CM7 ports for similar devices like Tass and Cooper as well as a Gio source provided by Phiexz but it didn't build either.
Thanks for the link, I'll check it out.
proprietary does not help
do you have any progress since last time?
well, I admit that proprietary files does not help.
does your s5660m hardware identical to s5660v?
becasuse galaxy gio in Korea(shw-m290k,shw-m290s) does different hardware.
well in this case, like me, you need to hack into not only android pdk, but also android kenel.
I have seen that phiexz has released kernel with latest cyanogenmod kenel in his github and I am modifing it to shw-m290k. there are some hardware differences i have to apply to.
I suggest you to compare phiexz's kernel and samsung original kernel from samsung opensource homepage.
My problem right now is that I don't have that much spare time to put into this, and that I'm very much learning as I go, so progress is not always that quick. Also, I'd like to get my Touchwiz based ROM updated and working properly before trying to build AOSP or CM again.
Another thing I want to try is building the kernel (probably based on Phiexz's) that will support ext4, and compare performance of the Touchwiz ROM on ext4 versus RFS.
As far as we can tell, GT-S5660 (Europe/Asia) GT-S5660M, L and V are identical except for the radio firmware. People with the 5660M initially encountered issues after flashing 5660 ROMs because they also contained the AMSS image.
my cyanogen kernel is based on samsung open source kernel
because cm-kernel on cyanogenmod github dont support our device, if we wnt use that kernel we must add some hardware pofile & board for galaxy gio
so alternative is make samsung's open source kernel compatible with cyanogenmod
Wouldn't it be much better from a code maintainability standpoint to make the CM kernel work on the Gio? (Also if you ever hope to get official CM team support, that's a given.)
The way I understand repo and git, you could create a github repo for your device and board configs and add those to your repo manifest so the whole CM7 source and your modifications all sync properly.
I've forked the CM7 manifest files off github, added my gio files and removed all those extra devices I didn't need, so my repo syncs are much faster too. (The idea comes from http://slightlymorethanworthless.blogspot.com/2011/05/remove-unwanted-devices-from.html)
hey a quick question...
just starting out here..
i'm on win7 32 bit, going to run ubuntu on virtualbox.
shud i choose ubuntu 32 bit or 64?
sorry for OT.
doesn't really matter
roofrider said:
hey a quick question...
just starting out here..
i'm on win7 32 bit, going to run ubuntu on virtualbox.
shud u choose ubuntu 32 bit or 64?
sorry for OT.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
doesn't really matter. but compiling process needs much cpu power. so 64x would be better.
Well, im not a dev or a user of gt5660m, but good luck to you, hope u can finally port it
Sent from the GUN in my pants
darkshado, if you have same problem untill now.
http://strazzere.com/blog/?p=220
look this page. and check out koush's proprietary page. especially for samsung cooper(galaxy ace). because many of kernel procedure are same for gio.
https://github.com/coolya/android_device_samsung_cooper.git
https://github.com/koush/proprietary_vendor_samsung
i've upload galaxy gio source + proprietary files for galaxy gio
please see & help to fix some problem
github.com/phiexz
Darkshado said:
Hello,
So far, I have:
A working Android build environment (Ubuntu 11.10 x64).
Managed to build, install and boot AOSP on my Nexus S. (I have downloaded but not attempted to build CM7 yet.)
Created a Github account.
Samsung's open source files for my target device, the Galaxy Gio GT-S5660M.
I've read some documentation and forum posts about Github, but I remain unsure as to what I should do to fork in a way that:
I'll be able to keep on syncing the remainder of the code.
My new device directories and modifications could be brought back (pulled?) to the main CM7 code base.
Will avoid needless frustrating re-downloads of the source code.
Thanks in advance,
Darkshado
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really the best kernel for your phone is here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1991020
BLN enabled, optimized&stable kernel, jelly bean look
Whoa! Zombie thread!
Dude: the ROM you linked was published over a year after my original post in this thread. I'm pretty sure there was NO CM7 build available for the Gio back then. That's what I was trying to work on, but got beat to the punch by Maclaw and a couple others. (Hard-bricking my Gio and having a sluggish laptop to build on didn't help.)
Besides, I got rid of my Gio a long time ago. I enjoy my Note 2 and keep my Nexus S as backup.

Found Kernel Sources, Help me narrow down the one for my device!

Hey Guys,
My Android lacks development, the only ROMs availible are just apk mods and build.prop edits. I am planning to build CM or some other AOSP-based ROM for my Phone. I found the source code for Qualcomm phones at CodeAurora: https://www.codeaurora.org/xwiki/bin/QAEP/WebHome
My Android runs 2.3.5 and the ro.product.board is msm7627a.
The problem is, there are 2 Gingerbreads for my msm7627a... "gingerbread" and "gingerbread_chocolate". And if I select one of them, I am presented with tons of other options.
I have built software from source in Ubuntu but something tells me that Android is completely different. Can somebody please point me in the right direction? After I find my device's source code, how will I use it to port CM?
And Mainly, which one is my Android's?
Note: I have attached the build.prop of my Rooted Stock ROM.

How do I develop an image for my Samsung Galaxy Note 3 from the Samsung Source Code?

I have a Samsung Galaxy Note 3 which I want to build an image for. I followed the procedures given by http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Build_for_hlte#Prepare_the_device-specific_code and I was able to compile it successfully. But I have an issue, and that is I need to patch the code to get additional functionality. The patch I need to apply is only available for Jelly Bean, and the Cyanogenmod procedures use Kitkat. I tried to manually apply the patch, and I had to remove a number of lines before the image compiled. But when I flash the phone with it, I get an error about NFC adapter. Basically the message says that NFC adapter is disabled. I think I know why it says that. The patch is for allowing extended functionality of NFC adapter, and well you know...It seems like either me or the patch broke the NFC adapter. Most likely it was me I tried to download the Jelly Bean version from Cyanogenmod repo, but the procedures explicitly say not to. And when I tried, I get a repo sync error and the whole thing does not download. So I am trying to do something different. I like to download the phone's source code from Samsung Source code. But that is just the kernel as I understand it. There is a lot of what Cyanogenmod people call "proprietary blob", which they provide a way to extract from the phone. So this is why I am where I am, and I am trying to mix the two together. Please tell me if there is a better way for me. And if not, then I like to know if it is possible for me to replace the Cyanogenmod source that I downloaded from Git repository with the Samsung Source and successfully compile it. I wish I could just download Cyanogenmod's version 10.5; I think they remove the previous version due to resource issues. I am not sure. I have to say Cyanogenmod rocks. My understanding is most developers there and here on this site are really busy. More power to you guys. You are really doing a big service for the open source community. Thank you all.
Thread moved to Q&A.

Mixing AOSP sources with Galaxy S4 Team-Gummy code

Hi all,
I've been experiencing with Team-Gummy Rom source code for quite some time now. I usually compile from source to get the latest, along with some of my own addition. Lately I've been obsessed with having Android L code running on my Galaxy S4 (qcom) and so I downloaded AOSP source and after some failed attempts I was able to build it with the S4 device package from Team gummy.
So way cool! I may have in my hands the first (maybe not but as far as I know anyway) Android L build on the S4. But before going further, I have a question. In theory if I flash the system.img file produced by the build process and keep the kernel and boot.img from my current install, it should all come together right? Anyone here has an Idea what it would do?

[Questions] Kernel source issues when compiling LOS/TWRP

Hello guys.
This question is specially for devs or advanced users with development skills.
My question is related to the kernel source of one of my devices, Huawei Mediapad T1 10 (codename: hwt1a21l). I got the kernel source from the oficial Huawei website and uploaded it to a github repo. My device, which has a msm8916 chiset, doesn't have any development (roms, recoveries, device tree, etc) and his rom, EMUI 3.0, is based on Kit Kat 4.4.2.
I have been trying to bring development for this tablet many months ago because the stock rom is too deprecated for the hardware that has, with the msm8916 there is a huge potential to bring it a lot of development.
Well, i'm going to summarize my problems when trying to bring development for the device:
To get started development, for example a LineageOS build i needed a solid base to start with: device tree, propietary blobs and kernel source, so i got all of them. I ported the device tree from another one very similar to mine (with the same chipset), extracted the propietary blobs with the build tools from the source and got the kernel source from the Huawei website. So everything seemed to be good, but when i start the build process with my Linux machine (repo sync > source build/envsetup.sh > breakfast hwt1a21l > brunch hwt1a21l) i always receive thousands of build error by the kernel source, and i have been fixing (or at least avoid) a lot of them but it never ends, so i don't know if it's worth to keep trying to "fix" them or if i'm wasting my time.
So, what i have been trying to do: i have been trying to build a LineageOS 14.1 and TWRP recovery with my device tree This: Mustang-ssc/android_device_huawei_msm8916-common ported from this one from @dianlujitao : dianlujitao/android_device_huawei_msm8916-common and the specific kernel source for my device downloaded from the Huawei website Mustang-ssc/android_kernel_huawei_hwt1a21l. Here ends the summary.
So after a lot of hours, days and nights over the last months trying to make progress with this and not getting any help from the few devs i asked after seeing my lack of progress i decided to publicly ask for help.
The questions:
1. I have the official kernel source (Mustang-ssc/android_kernel_huawei_hwt1a21l) which i didn't have success to compile it, and then i saw the kernel source from a device almost identical to mine (same chipset, brand, ram, ...) (dianlujitao/android_kernel_huawei_msm8916). Can i use that kernel source as a base for my device after porting the specific configurations of my official kernel source (defconfig, drivers, libraries)? That one is much more updated and probably optimized than mine, but i don't know if it's possible to adapt a kernel source from other device using your kernel source.
2. This may be a dumb question: my device has Kit Kat 4.4.2. Is there any link between the kernel source and the android version the device has? I mean, i don't know if i should do something to adapt my kernel source for newer android versions (Marshmallow, Nougat) of if it's ok to just build with it without any change.
If you read it all, congratulations, you're awesome
Still waiting for a reply

Categories

Resources