{video}jelly bean on touchpad - TouchPad General

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJvkfizgVEc
[HPTouchpad] 3.0.0 Preview1,There's quite a bit not working, this is just a preview
this is not my work, this rom its from evervolv team

whats working and doesnt working
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using XDA Premium HD app

sahhar1993 said:
whats working and doesnt working
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you mean WHAT doesnt working
no sound
no hardware accelaration
no mic
no wifi

nikos5800 said:
you mean WHAT doesnt working
no sound
no hardware accelaration
no mic
no wifi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wifi works.

reverendkjr said:
wifi works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah on cm10 unofficial, this ROM its from evervolv team

nikos5800 said:
Yeah on cm10 unofficial, this ROM its from evervolv team
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't realize that this was from evervolv. You may want to specify that in your post or on your video description.

I'm not allowed to post this in the Development section and I have a Captcha to deal with..........................................
But I read that Jelly bean is "Faster" but is this not because most features on the TP are not working right now?

drfp said:
I'm not allowed to post this in the Development section and I have a Captcha to deal with..........................................
But I read that Jelly bean is "Faster" but is this not because most features on the TP are not working right now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jelly Bean is a faster ROM with all feutures working, but that currently is not the case. HW acceleration does not work, and that is a big function to obtain the use of project butter. CM9 is still faster currently. Those that believe the unofficial cm10 update is faster are currently under a "placebo effect". In other words, they want the experience so bad that they truly believe they are having a "faster" UI experience. If you keep an unbiased opinion and try out both you will see CM9 is much faster (and stable). Although, once HW is implemented, this will be another story and made irrelevant.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda app-developers app

Cm9 is becoming pretty polished with just the camera as a major issue, the TP even charges from most sources now unlike WEBOS needing original adaptor :thumbdown:
All in all with ICS still being new for mainstream I'm happy
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 2

Problem
I have problem when flash cm10 :
symlink: some symlinks failed
(Status 7)
Installation Aborted.
How to fix ?

harry277 said:
I have problem when flash cm10 :
symlink: some symlinks failed
(Status 7)
Installation Aborted.
How to fix ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try redownloading, my'ne installed on the first try.
sent from my HP Touchpad. Dual-booting Android 4.0.4 and WebOS 3.0.5

Apparantely Dev oats is running a jb rom that has almost everything working :laugh:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1557111&page=91

Related

[Q] CM7 or CM9?

Which is better? CM7 or CM9? which is more stable at this moment? Some are saying these bugs and some are not. Need help.
Cm7 is stable.
Cm9 is in development stage.
kindly search before posting .and also think before posting something.
use common sense.
evil_penguin said:
Cm7 is stable.
Cm9 is in development stage.
kindly search before posting .and also think before posting something.
use common sense.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for that. I'm new here. I'd like to find someone who can help me.
pakeronjay said:
Sorry for that. I'm new here. I'd like to find someone who can help me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FIRST READ ALL THE STICKIES THREAD!!!
----------------
Sent from my Ace. Galaxy Ace
pakeronjay said:
Which is better? CM7 or CM9? which is more stable at this moment? Some are saying these bugs and some are not. Need help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM9 is currently under development, although it almost has no major issues (only camera) it's still better to use cm7 as of now. Kabayan! ^.^
Doo:DAce said:
CM9 is currently under development, although it almost has no major issues (only camera) it's still better to use cm7 as of now. Kabayan! ^.^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hoo! Kabayan! Are you using CM9 already?
Has evil_penguin said for the moment cm9 is on development but the port made by Maclaw and his team are really stable (some force close of course sometime but it's a beta so it's normal ). For me the big different for the moment between cm7 and cm9 it's just the camera who does not work for the moment in cm9. But if you want more details just go here===>http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1490867. Hope i help you
*Sorry for my imperfect english
hmm...
cm9 available?
For me, cm7 is stable because for example camera and radio works (in cm9 currently don't work). But i think cm9 looks better. if you don't use camera and radio, install cm9.
---------- Post added at 03:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:31 PM ----------
jereka08 said:
cm9 available?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes is available but in beta version.
jereka08 said:
cm9 available?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah it is available but yet unstable. What ROM are you using?
pakeronjay said:
Yeah it is available but yet unstable. What ROM are you using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For my part it's cm9 beta5 from Maclaw and his team but i don't really understand what is "better" for you if it's the stabilty and all fonctionnality work so it's cm7 but cm9 look really great but still in beta so it's sure it will be less stable and some function are missing (camera is the big one for the moment). It's all about how you use your phone if you use a lot your camera if you want to have a smooth surf on the net...etc. I use cm9 and i'm really happy with it just wait a little and cm9 will have all the functionality work
*Sorry for my imperfect english
Maclaw's CM9 is smoother than GB and CM7.... Only Camera is the main problem!
The performance of CM9 forced me to use it... Lol
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
I'm using CM7 atm, I like it. It's clean and fast.
CM9 is one of the most desirable roms now a days as it is ice creams sandwitch. but the main issue right now is the camera and it is still in the development stage(Beta). So, if you can manage w/o using your camera on your phone you can go for CM9 other wise CM7
how about radio in the CM9 ?
I'm not fond of cm9 as its lack of compatibility. Bleeding edge rom
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk
scoffyburito said:
I'm not fond of cm9 as its lack of compatibility. Bleeding edge rom
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right..certain apps are not compatible with ICS. But gradually they will be....with time.Happens with every new OS upgrade.
+1 for CM9..i'm using it now. beta 6 is very smooth with 4.0.4 version.
now just waiting for camera fix and 3.x kernel
go for the CM7 coz its more stable and everthing i mean everthing works like charm , while CM9 still in devolopedment and there are some issues and might not be good for daily use
Stable? Go for CM7.
Forget CM9. Forget it. At least for now
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk

ICS ROMS better than the ICS passion

can you please tell me roms which are better than the ics passion (smooth,reliablitity etc)
and if you name a rom..can you name the bugs in that rom???
manu_ha2001 said:
can you please tell me roms which are better than the ics passion (smooth,reliablitity etc)
and if you name a rom..can you name the bugs in that rom???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ice Cream Zenwich is your answer....there's no more on xda but on rootzwiki....and here's the link: http://rootzwiki.com/topic/21742-ro...mmer-of-buddha-5-26-12-deficient-development/
Enjoy!
Thats a personal preference answer. BUT, i prefer ICZenwich also. i actually go back and forth between ICZ, AOKP, and Gummy. I dont have a problem with passion, it was my first ICS, but there was a point where there were way too many test updates going on. i could never get GPS to work except for on one particular release with a certain kernel but it ended up being outdated. but i still kept the files though. It has been a while but maybe i will try passion again
CM9 nightlies seem to be doing well right now! Maybe try those, they have no bugs.
whatiznt said:
CM9 nightlies seem to be doing well right now! Maybe try those, they have no bugs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wouldn't say NO bugs but any ICS ROM bug exists between ALL variants.
CM9 has bugs--->AOKP is based on CM9 so AOKP has bugs ---> MIUI is based on CM9 so MIUI has bugs
Has anyone tried Chimera v1.1 on Team Passion website? Hows that one?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
Nabeel10 said:
Has anyone tried Chimera v1.1 on Team Passion website? Hows that one?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Amazing!!
I've been running it for a couple of weeks now and it's both fast and stable. I personally think it's the best out there. And the Amora rom installer is awesome.
razredge said:
Amazing!!
I've been running it for a couple of weeks now and it's both fast and stable. I personally think it's the best out there. And the Amora rom installer is awesome.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, loving chimera with platypus kernel and great battery life. Videos do not work on sub zero kernel FYI. The aroma installer is pretty sick, very easy to install.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
iTz KeeFy said:
Videos do not work on sub zero kernel FYI.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not true, 720p video playback works flawlessly for me on subZero #80. However, I believe MP's latest build (#128) may require an add-on fix for it to work properly with BIGMEM enabled... You know what, I'm gonna go install the latest subZero right now and post back here on what I find.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk 2
manu_ha2001 said:
can you please tell me roms which are better than the ics passion (smooth,reliablitity etc)
and if you name a rom..can you name the bugs in that rom???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ice Cream Zenwich
ICZen just rolled out with a new version yesterday that was compiled with the Linaro toolchain...I'm excited to see the effects ^^ (Today will be my first day running it)...but I can say confidently that based on my experience across the different ICS roms....Br1cK'd's Zen is always phenomenal.

[Q] Which rom should I use for Samsung galaxy tab 10.1 P7500

Title says it all.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda app-developers app
Ayouby said:
Title says it all.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is going to be closed soo fast, but get the latest cm9 nightly.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
kilometers4 said:
This is going to be closed soo fast, but get the latest cm9 nightly.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, completely with him. But, oh well.
For HoneyComb, I've always preferred Galaxy Task 14. Its fast, stable, smooth, and it feels great. But if you're looking for a non-touchwized HC version I suggest Clean Rom. You'll need honeycomb for now if you want camera support, no ICS/JB ROMs support camera until Sammy' decides to cough up the source/drivers.
For ICS it really depends. CM9 nightly builds are great, but I've always gone back to AOKP nightlies/milestones after a CM9 flash. I feel AOKP has a quicker, snappier feel to it. Plus, AOKP is highly customizable. I suggest Milestone 6.
For JB theres just one port, but this really isn't for the faint of heart since wifi, sound, and the camera do not work at all. This is highly experimental and you really should go here if you're looking for a daily driver, but it is really smooth.
Overall, I suggest AOKP M6 its really smooth, and its ICS. The only down side is the camera issue.
With the ease of flashing these ROM's it would be beneficial to test each one and see what you think offers you the best stability, response, and works with whichever apps you use.
I have been playing with Scott's CleanROM 2.0 and Task650's Task14 slim. I am currently on Task's ROM and using Pershoots kernel. I honestly like both ROM's thus far.... going to test out Bindroid next.
Those roms task14 and clean are for wifi only he has p7500 use bindroid for honey comb or cyanogennod9 for ics.. I'd recommend cm9 look for it in cm9 Site as p4 with no variants but p4
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Wait for stable Jelly Bean Rom
I have tested JB ROM. Still its to early to comment but its buttery smooth and lightning fast. After a stable rom comes. It would be way better then ICS or honeycomb.
Test and explore different Roms and decide for yourself. I settled on Task's Slim 14.
npalmy said:
Test and explore different Roms and decide for yourself. I settled on Task's Slim 14.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not for 3g
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
kilometers4 said:
This is going to be closed soo fast...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see why that has to be the case, provided people can stay mature and polite to one another.
If the thread descends into flaming then of course it'll be locked but in the mean time, I see no reason not to give it a fair chance.
Ayouby said:
Title says it all.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you can see all roms available for specific devices in one thread. see this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1651794

CyanogenMOD 10 Support thread Alpha1

Hey guys, this thread will be used to share peoples ways and how they fix some problem in CM10.
Well heres mine, I managed to fix super user remembering problems by installing SuperSU.
What about you?
Also anyone can tell me how to change the speaker to loud speaker? Since Maclaw said loudspeaker is working. Can anyone tell me. And confirm that my super user guide worked?
i was not satisfied with CM9 and hence i am using apocalypse rom (superb performance). Is cm10 better than cm9??? hows the battery performance/ stability? hangs?? is camera working??
swaroop_p1988 said:
i was not satisfied with CM9 and hence i am using apocalypse rom (superb performance). Is cm10 better than cm9??? hows the battery performance/ stability? hangs?? is camera working??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Woah woah.....!!!
Stop right there my dear friend!!
The CM10 is still in alpha stage! Remember that!
Anyway, the alpha stage is smoother than Cm9 due to project butter, stable enough, deep sleep works for some users only and you cant expect camera yet and you know that!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
hmm ok.. thanks for the reply.. hope we can wait for few more days to get a stable cm9 and cm10 working with all features.
There is already a support thread for CM10
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1793071
acd1055 said:
There is already a support thread for CM10
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1793071
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know but this one was created first
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk
acd1055 said:
There is already a support thread for CM10
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1793071
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That thread is a little different from this thread. It is a general thread for discussion of the rom, reviews, help, etc...it is not only a support thread, but is also for other discussion!
Well said
dhalham said:
I know but this one was created first
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair enough..

Is it ok to flash cm10?

Hello I'm on notachtrix with Mrom kernal and i want to go for cm10 so is it ok to flash it right away? Because I'm little concerned about the kernel should i install a stock kernal before or it doesn't matter?
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2
Monzer_ said:
Hello I'm on notachtrix with Mrom kernal and i want to go for cm10 so is it ok to flash it right away? Because I'm little concerned about the kernel should i install a stock kernal before or it doesn't matter?
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you're talking about epinter's cm10, it already comes with its modified kernel. you dont have to do any kernel stuff, just follow instructions.
saldirai said:
if you're talking about epinter's cm10, it already comes with its modified kernel. you dont have to do any kernel stuff, just follow instructions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes you were right thanks .
Epinters cm10.1 works great too!
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
But do bluetooh and video recorder work out of the box on epinter's CM10.1?
Nope. BT works on 10.0 though. My video is messed up on both.
tkirkland said:
Nope. BT works on 10.0 though. My video is messed up on both.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I'll stick with the whole functional CM7 until a more stable CM10 is released.
I think Epinter's cm10 works almost perfect as a daily drive if you don't care much about playing game because of lack of hwa. A new kernel is under development by some dedicated devs and it probably takes about 2-3 months to get done (i guess ).
Is there any video hardware acceleration support (2D/3D HW) with any ICS/JB rom? or is it broken due to the non-provision of drivers and stuff?
dark_prince said:
Is there any video hardware acceleration support (2D/3D HW) with any ICS/JB rom? or is it broken due to the non-provision of drivers and stuff?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no at the moment. and yes, because there is no official video driver.

Categories

Resources