I made a small search on NVIDIA and I think that this is the drivers for ICS
Tegra Android Ice Cream Sandwich (4.0) OS Image for Tegra2 Developer Kit (Ventana)
This includes the Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) OS Image for Tegra2 Developer Kits. This image fully supports the debugging and profiling tools included in the Tegra Android Toolkit.
Windows
OSX
Ubuntu 32-bit
Ubuntu 64-bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here written that those drivers supports ICS and i hope it will help you
here the source on nvidia site
http://www.nvidia.com/content/devzone/tegra-android-developer-pack.html
do you think\know it will work with ICS now?
It's been discussed before, these aren't helpful.
Sent from my MB860
What would make this helpful is a member who actually knows 'WHY" its not helpful and spelling out the reason. Possibly linking another "Discussion" on the topic so when others pull this up on a search they don't leave empty handed and re post something similar. I vote MaxK47 do the honors since he seams know better already lol. Thanks very much .
I think these can't help.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
zlongmax said:
I think these can't help.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a very detailed answer! If you are not able to explain why these drivers and DK are not useful in order to make a fully functioning ICS for Atrix I'd rather say that it's better to stay tight-lipped and don't make useless posts. Okay? Thanks.
These aren't useful because we need a 3.x.x kernel source to make these work.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
djluis48 said:
These aren't useful because we need a 3.x.x kernel source to make these work.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great! The answer is almost right, almost. These drivers can be useful for 2.6 kernel as well but there are many but....so....it would be better and it's possible but difficult and annoying enough to work out a 3.0 kernel based on original basic ICS kernel modified in order to be used on Atrix.
Cab121 said:
What would make this helpful is a member who actually knows 'WHY" its not helpful and spelling out the reason. Possibly linking another "Discussion" on the topic so when others pull this up on a search they don't leave empty handed and re post something similar. I vote MaxK47 do the honors since he seams know better already lol. Thanks very much .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=29549045#post29549045
Said by one of the top developers of our community.
Related
Anyone know if there is a place to check for cyanogenmod updates? I know no deadlines, but gingerbread is so rough on a tablet.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
I am also interested since I have seen working ports already for my electrify and some progress for the nook color
Sent from my lil electric mopho using XDA App
look at dalingrin's twitter for updates.
If you're wondering about ICS on the touchpad...look at dalingrin's twitter posts.
If you're looking for CM9, all i know is they've released a pre-alpha version of the launcher from CM9 for Devices with ICS....how far that puts them down the line to finishing it? I do not know but i'm waiting too (impatiently)
Here is the official source of CM news:
http://www.cyanogenmod.com/
I would imagine any general news on CM9 will be all over once its out. I saw the news on the launcher in at least 3 different sites within hours of the announcement.
Sent from my Galaxy S II (i777)
T-Keith said:
Anyone know if there is a place to check for cyanogenmod updates? I know no deadlines, but gingerbread is so rough on a tablet.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The most obvious place would be:
http://www.cyanogenmod.com/:rolleyes:
EDIT: I was reheating dinner, and someone just posted the same while my food was being warmed. Sry for the double post
T-Keith said:
Anyone know if there is a place to check for cyanogenmod updates? I know no deadlines, but gingerbread is so rough on a tablet.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like how that was worded, it is truly rough. Phone versions of android do work on tablets but its clearly wrong.
The Jack of Clubs said:
I like how that was worded, it is truly rough. Phone versions of android do work on tablets but its clearly wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed Leo and Scott are doing a great job at developing cm7/MIUI to work on a tablet as best it can.. But it is almost a lost cause since ics is already on a lot of devices....
I'm sure modifying a kanged ROM is a lot easier than making a port/SDK ROM as a lot of the drivers have to be made from scratch... I've given up on android on the TP till ICS. When that happens ill donate a handsome reward to the team that does it.. till then... WebOS will have to do... As I only use it for media/web I'm good for now... I have a EVO 3d for apps and such that android excels in...
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
@dalingrin I know you don't give ETAs on anything, but is the ICS build anywhere close to GB Alpha 1? Thanks.
@dalingrin:
@SyncV2 Primary issues are GPU rendering under some circumstances and video playback. Hope to finally get back to working on it tonight.
I know it is very early.....but I was who seeing whether it was possible to port jellybean on HP touchpad via SDK....devs at Acer A500 have done it...
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
vipaman said:
I know it is very early.....but I was who seeing whether it was possible to port jellybean on HP touchpad via SDK....devs at Acer A500 have done it...
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it is possible... theres somebody on the evo 3D doing it, same chipset so its not a far fetched idea.....whether we get a working version, who knows, we'll have to wait for the cm team like last time and they never do things without source, and if anybody wants to port it via SDK, good luck i guess cuz i dont think anybody tried SDK ports for ICS on the touchpad
ace9988 said:
it is possible... theres somebody on the evo 3D doing it, same chipset so its not a far fetched idea.....whether we get a working version, who knows, we'll have to wait for the cm team like last time and they never do things without source, and if anybody wants to port it via SDK, good luck i guess cuz i dont think anybody tried SDK ports for ICS on the touchpad
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And since Jelly Bean is just like a small step from ICS.... It shouldn't be that hard.... Only project butter stands in our way...
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda app-developers app
vipaman said:
I know it is very early.....but I was who seeing whether it was possible to port jellybean on HP touchpad via SDK....devs at Acer A500 have done it...
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They use unmodified cm9 kernel
So we just need someone to compile the sdk
Sent from my HTC PucciniLte using XDA Premium HD app
sahhar1993 said:
They use unmodified cm9 kernel
So we just need someone to compile the sdk
Sent from my HTC PucciniLte using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We could contact the cm team but I guess they would not build the sdk one....so we will need to contact other devs
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
vipaman said:
And since Jelly Bean is just like a small step from ICS.... It shouldn't be that hard.... Only project butter stands in our way...
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
don't be saying things down that road lol...you'll get alot of backlash like the e3d forums.....froyo to gingerbread wasn't a huge step but it took people a very long time. Lets just wait for source to be out next month it isnt a very long time. Then since the base framework is similar, it won't take that much longer then it should. I'm more interested in the PDK feature which gives basic source codes for the hardware side of things, exciting times
ace9988 said:
don't be saying things down that road lol...you'll get alot of backlash like the e3d forums.....froyo to gingerbread wasn't a huge step but it took people a very long time. Lets just wait for source to be out next month it isnt a very long time. Then since the base framework is similar, it won't take that much longer then it should. I'm more interested in the PDK feature which gives basic source codes for the hardware side of things, exciting times
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U don't understand small step...the base is the same...the framework has been tweaked and the system has been made more fluid due to project butter so.....it should not be took hard to port from the sdk
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
vipaman said:
U don't understand small step...the base is the same...the framework has been tweaked and the system has been made more fluid due to project butter so.....it should not be took hard to port from the sdk
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Porting anything from the SDK has always been horrible, its not that easy and even if it were that isn't to say it'll be any good.
Remember those SDK ports of Honeycomb...horrendous. There's a reason nobody bothered with an SDK port of ICS for the Touchpad...there terrible.
I'm fine with just waiting until source code is ready. Unlike the switch from GB to ICS on a tablet which was huge, JB isn't really groundbreaking. It has some nice new features but after playing around in the SDK for a while I didn't really see anything that I couldn't wait a few months for.
vipaman said:
U don't understand small step...the base is the same...the framework has been tweaked and the system has been made more fluid due to project butter so.....it should not be took hard to port from the sdk
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand it perfectly......it is a small step yes, but in the grand scheme of things when you get an SDK port, when has it always worked perfectly?? If we're testing proof of concept here i can understand but you people want jelly bean to use straight away and to tinker with it. Devs I think have lives and if someone wanted to do it, they would've done it by now cuz its already being booted (albeit black screen) on the one x. Instead of the frustration of porting something using SDK they'd rather wait for source, because then people will start complaining that "this doesn't work, that doesn't work" so on and so forth
Anyone else think it's weird how they went back to the phone layout for the nexus 7? Will it be that way on larger tablets? I'm not a huge fan of how notifications work on my touchpad but the controls may be hard to reach if they go with a phone layout.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
I'd like to mess with SDK port. If a dev would do it. The port for one x has already been updated. They are really going at it...even if they know it wont ever fully work. Maybe they are just getting head start on development.
Sent from my HTC VLE_U using xda app-developers app
its a waste of time. why would any dev spend their time on it,just to have to start over when the real source
comes out.
Why don't you ask the one x dev working on SDK port why he is deving it? Jb source will be out in 2 weeks.
Sent from my HTC VLE_U using xda app-developers app
People do it because they want to. Why should that affect others?
Sent from my HTC Desire S using Tapatalk 2
T-Keith said:
Anyone else think it's weird how they went back to the phone layout for the nexus 7? Will it be that way on larger tablets? I'm not a huge fan of how notifications work on my touchpad but the controls may be hard to reach if they go with a phone layout.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
while the current tablet ui layout is mostly functional, its not very pretty and a bit disjointed when coming from a phone version of android. it also doesnt allow manufacturers to put physical buttons on a tablet without them being redundant, and is called fragmented when compared to the ios on the iphone to ipad. it wouldnt surprise me if they went with this design as their new tablet layout. and it probably wouldnt be as bad as you think. with future cm9 or aokp customizations, youll probably be able to adjust the positions of the nav bar however you want.
The Jack of Clubs said:
while the current tablet ui layout is mostly functional, its not very pretty and a bit disjointed when coming from a phone version of android. it also doesnt allow manufacturers to put physical buttons on a tablet without them being redundant, and is called fragmented when compared to the ios on the iphone to ipad. it wouldnt surprise me if they went with this design as their new tablet layout. and it probably wouldnt be as bad as you think. with future cm9 or aokp customizations, youll probably be able to adjust the positions of the nav bar however you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've long thought that the tablet UI for large tablets makes a lot of sense as if straddles the ground between desktop and phone quite nicely. Google aren't making the Nexus 7 UI default for these tablets either, if you emulate a touchpad withe the sdk then you get the UI we have now. On my small A100 the layout is pretty poor, and of course the resolution isn't all that great either but it's so crowded. The Nexus 7 UI works out nicely for smaller screens I think
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda premium
Yeah I tried a Galaxy tab 7 at the store yesterday and the ics tablet mode is a little tight. Maybe it wouldn't be a bad thing for a 7" tablet.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Does that mean that all the work that has been done so far to get a working camera and microphone on ICS for the TP will go to waste with a new firmware?
kalala said:
Does that mean that all the work that has been done so far to get a working camera and microphone on ICS for the TP will go to waste with a new firmware?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it shouldn't be a waste. ICS is 4.0.x, JB is 4.1.x and is a refined ICS. So all the progress should be able to migrate over.
Sent from my AOKP Touchpad.
Hi gang.
Here is an idea brewing in my head. I know it will spin your head. I am embarking on a mission to bring AOSP to this forsaken land... Fair warning. As you see, there is no "recognized developer" tag underneath my name and for a good reason, I am not one! An average newb here as far as AOSP deving is concerned. I do know the very basics, I did build a couple AOSP builds for the Dinc2 and Transformer prime, but that was trivial as those devices were already supported. This device is not. So, I'll need to figure out how to first setup the environment for this and then learn to make a kernel from the source HTC has (if they released it that is).
So, anyone here who can point me to the right direction to kick this off!?
This thread is intended to be a platform for all those interested in helping bring AOSP to our device. Any and all helpful suggestions in this regard will be appreciated!
Hell yeah! I'm pretty sure if we all pull together we can get something cooking. I was wondering though obviously we aren't on jelly bean. Would it be easier to build an ics cm9 and then add select features like the lock screen, camera, animations etc?
Linch89 said:
Hell yeah! I'm pretty sure if we all pull together we can get something cooking. I was wondering though obviously we aren't on jelly bean. Would it be easier to build an ics cm9 and then add select features like the lock screen, camera, animations etc?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dunno. I was actually thinking if it is better to build Jellybean 4.1 rather than the latest and greatest 4.2.1. But if there aren't significant changes, may be we can pull off a 4.2 build. I just want to first learn to compile AOSP so that it even boots. I believe I need to mod files to build it for our environment... I wonder where I can learn this stuff..
Nits, Andy, help please!
My new laptop is running Windows 8 and I believe it will be a PITA to get Linux running natively on that due to the UEFI fiasco... I wonder if VM linux will be as fast as native... If not, I'll use my current machine to build and use the new one to due my regular stuff...
litetaker said:
Dunno. I was actually thinking if it is better to build Jellybean 4.1 rather than the latest and greatest 4.2.1. But if there aren't significant changes, may be we can pull off a 4.2 build. I just want to first learn to compile AOSP so that it even boots. I believe I need to mod files to build it for our environment... I wonder where I can learn this stuff..
Nits, Andy, help please!
My new laptop is running Windows 8 and I believe it will be a PITA to get Linux running natively on that due to the UEFI fiasco... I wonder if VM linux will be as fast as native... If not, I'll use my current machine to build and use the new one to due my regular stuff...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know as there are significant changes but most of the changes are with the lock screen and launcher.
Im up my incredible comes friday
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app
jose51197 said:
Im up my incredible comes friday
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My new laptop has just arrived. I wanna ask, will building android be significantly hampered on a virtual machine instead of natively? This new machine comes with windows 8 and potentially will be a pain to load Linux on it. Plus this laptop is meant for someone else and I dont think they will be pleased with Linux on their PC...
Sent from my ADR6410LVW using XDA Premium HD app
litetaker said:
My new laptop has just arrived. I wanna ask, will building android be significantly hampered on a virtual machine instead of natively? This new machine comes with windows 8 and potentially will be a pain to load Linux on it. Plus this laptop is meant for someone else and I dont think they will be pleased with Linux on their PC...
Sent from my ADR6410LVW using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its always better to have full ubuntu, personally i have win8 too but i installed wubi for ubuntu and everything looks fine(for being a pentium) ubuntu doesnt take much
jose51197 said:
its always better to have full ubuntu, personally i have win8 too but i installed wubi for ubuntu and everything looks fine(for being a pentium) ubuntu doesnt take much
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMG! First build in progress. The damn thing is ACTUALLY building, I think! But still, if I were you, I wouldn't hold my breath. 99.9% sure the end result will most likely not boot!
EDIT: Of course, all that I said before is of any value only if this thing finishes compiling without errors. And I already had a few errors (which I was able to fix). God, I hope this thing compiles! :fingers-crossed:
Update: Several compilation errors. Failure guys :/ Will retry tomorrow...
Hey litetaker, just wanna say thanks so much for doing this I really appreciate it and I'm sure many others do too!
Ill work with him today on my free time, also welcome the new team fireballas member litetaker
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app
jose51197 said:
Ill work with him today on my free time, also welcome the new team fireballas member litetaker
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks buddy! Let's do this!
Watching you guys closely love what your doing for this community so for this and all future projects you may have plesse know I'm always willing to load up (Flash) any software you create no matter what beta stage it may be in, it is the least I can do for you and the rest of this great community since I can't develop which I wish I could oh do I wish but seriously keep that in mind my friends.
Sent from my all powerful Inc4G
prairiedogn said:
Watching you guys closely love what your doing for this community so for this and all future projects you may have plesse know I'm always willing to load up (Flash) any software you create no matter what beta stage it may be in, it is the least I can do for you and the rest of this great community since I can't develop which I wish I could oh do I wish but seriously keep that in mind my friends.
Sent from my all powerful Inc4G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great to have volunteers, but by now we are just getting close to get a booteable cm10, will tell you when it boots
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app
jose51197 said:
Great to have volunteers, but by now we are just getting close to get a booteable cm10, will tell you when it boots
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome, just awesome.
Sent from my ADR6410LVW using xda app-developers app
I've been informed that AOSP has booted on our phone..
andybones said:
I've been informed that AOSP has booted on our phone..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First, news of s-off. Now, AOSP has booted. I don't know how this day can get any better.
Sent from my ADR6410LVW using xda app-developers app
Like I said I'm really starting to love this phone very happy with all the activity in this forum.
Sent from my all powerful Inc4G
andybones said:
I've been informed that AOSP has booted on our phone..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know who else is working with this?(only if you can tell)
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app
Aosp booted
Heres a video of my progress on aosp on this device(never developed a rom without proper files so this is new to me)
will put right here when it uploads
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQ_AmZJ5Fu4
The evo 4g lte seems similar in specs to our phone in some regards and it has aosp. Could any of their work help us?
Sent from my ADR6410LVW using xda app-developers app
Hi all,
I dont know if this was checked just stumbled upon one old thread where the dev was talking about using old GB lib /driver for ICS for Qualcom.Can the similar thing be attempted on photon... ?
I do not have any knowledge on developing so just asking if this can be done..
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1960117
I don't think it would help since that's for Qualcomm processors. Besides, we are already using a frankensteined froyo kernel for our ics/jb roms.
Sent from my sunfire using xda premium
Akhileshjj said:
Hi all,
I dont know if this was checked just stumbled upon one old thread where the dev was talking about using old GB lib /driver for ICS for Qualcom.Can the similar thing be attempted on photon... ?
I do not have any knowledge on developing so just asking if this can be done..
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1960117
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know what you mean. I am going to be trying to figure out what I can do with our stock kernel very soon. I'm syncing the whole android repo as we speak. I have been for a few hours...lol. It will be my first attempt at building from source but I have a bit of background in linux and in android app/game development so I guess Ill give it a shot.
I wish you luck. newer drivers would be a great help to this community and the photon 4g in general.
Agreed, That would be much appreciated.
atsuisofu said:
Agreed, That would be much appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Ubuntu phone ROMs are available for Nexus devices, and from what little I've read, if you can install CM10 you can install Ubuntu. I know we have some CM10 projects, but is anyone interested in trying to get Ubuntu phone to run on a Player?
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda app-developers app
I dont have a linux system currently or any dev experience at all (other than making a "hello world" app)lol but im extremely interested in this project, im at least up for testing if necessary
Sent from my USA Galaxy Player 5.0
It is definitely possible however it hasn't been fully released yet, it would be quite difficult to port it at this stage.
Sent from my ZX Spectrum
joemhewitt said:
It is definitely possible however it hasn't been fully released yet, it would be quite difficult to port it at this stage.
Sent from my ZX Spectrum
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really there is a really simple quide on the ubuntu site
safariking said:
Not really there is a really simple quide on the ubuntu site
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you find it simple then you port it. I don't find it simple.
Sent from my ZX Spectrum
Just to give you guys a heads up.
The Ubuntu touch Dev preview is just a preview. Hardly anything works and it's just not made to be used right now. So I don't think the D's devs would waste their time on this.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Yeah, I noticed that when I went back to the site for a closer look. Still, glad to see I'm not the only one interested.
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda app-developers app
shahrukhraza said:
Just to give you guys a heads up.
The Ubuntu touch Dev preview is just a preview. Hardly anything works and it's just not made to be used right now. So I don't think the D's devs would waste their time on this.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right if it was stable then i was building it but now im not gonna waste my time on something that is a little to much unstable now!