High kernel usage - HTC Droid DNA

Loving the DNA so far but I've noticed my kernel usage has been high. I don't think It's almost never been below 30%, at one point it was at 50%. From my understanding this is not normal and is creating bad battery drain. If anyone has any suggestions or advice it would be appreciated. Maybe I should try a different kernel? Here's some screenshots from a few minutes ago.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium

Kasab said:
Loving the DNA so far but I've noticed my kernel usage has been high. I don't think It's almost never been below 30%, at one point it was at 50%. From my understanding this is not normal. If anyone has any suggestions or advice it would be appreciated. Maybe I should try a different kernel? Here's some screenshots from a few minutes ago.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can try a different kernel there are two different ones in this forum: http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1967 . However, the kernel is (are) the piece(s) of software that basically runs everything, so having the most battery usage out of the kernel is to be expected. The kernels on the form I gave may have better battery usage for multiple reasons (optimized resource usage, bloat removed, etc.) but it will (probably) still be the biggest battery eater.

Mazer_R said:
You can try a different kernel there are two different ones in this forum: http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1967 . However, the kernel is (are) the piece(s) of software that basically runs everything, so having the most battery usage out of the kernel is to be expected. The kernels on the form I gave may have better battery usage for multiple reasons (optimized resource usage, bloat removed, etc.) but it will (probably) still be the biggest battery eater.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I was kinda thinking that. It makes sense that the kernel will be higher in percentage the less the screen is used and vice versa. Just seemed like my battery drain was excessive and since the kernel usage percentage was the highest I assumed that it was the problem. I'll give a different kernel a go and see what happens. Thanks again.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium

Kasab said:
Thanks. I was kinda thinking that. It makes sense that the kernel will be higher in percentage the less the screen is used and vice versa. Just seemed like my battery drain was excessive and since the kernel usage percentage was the highest I assumed that it was the problem. I'll give a different kernel a go and see what happens. Thanks again.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure thing, but don't expect much more battery life. With a quad core processor, two gigabytes of RAM, a 1080p screen, and an active 4G radio this monster draws a lot of power.

Mazer_R said:
Sure thing, but don't expect much more battery life. With a quad core processor, two gigabytes of RAM, a 1080p screen, and an active 4G radio this monster draws a lot of power.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hear ya. Just seems like I'm getting a lot less battery than what I've seen other people claim they get, especially in deep sleep but oh well. And yes, this thing is a monster lol. Best phone I've had yet.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium

I wondered the same. Both kernal usage and android system are many times higher than my last HTC.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app

Related

Battery

I recently switched to the galaxy note and the battery life is awful.. Is it just me? Should I go get a new phone?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
I've been using my note all day and my battery is still 37%
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
MUFC17JW said:
I recently switched to the galaxy note and the battery life is awful.. Is it just me? Should I go get a new phone?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I started a thread about battery problems. Its the one that says "battery problems" in the general forum. Check it out and compare
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
How could we possibly answer this when you do not define awful.
MUFC17JW said:
I recently switched to the galaxy note and the battery life is awful.. Is it just me? Should I go get a new phone?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you using LTE all day?
Sent from my SGH-I717D using xda premium
Battery life on my Note easily lasts all day.
Sent from my Galaxy Note (SGH-i717) using XDA Premium.
It would be helpful if you elaborate your Note's set-up. Such as like what ROM is being used, brightness level, LTE/no LTE, etc...
My Note currently has no issue lasting a full work-day with LTE on the whole time. And this is with moderate usage. (No videos, and minimal music)
I'm satisfied with mine... Just keep a charger near by.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
There are only a few reasons why you see your battery life as terrible.
1) You are coming from an iPhone. But now you're using a tool of a phone, not a toy, so your battery life will be lower.
2) You are coming from the Droid RAZR MAXX, which is the only android with a bigger battery.
3) You have a rogue app that you didn't use before that is draining your battery life.
4) You are using excessive amounts of LTE data, and you came from a phone without LTE.
If those apply to you, there's your answer. If they don't, you may just have a bad device or battery.
You really need to be more specific when stating something as subjective as battery life is terrible. May I suggest you post screenshots of your battery stats so that you can give some insight to why your battery life is terrible. Coming on these forums and ranting without evidence won't get you very far.
welchertc said:
There are only a few reasons why you see your battery life as terrible.
1) You are coming from an iPhone. But now you're using a tool of a phone, not a toy, so your battery life will be lower.
2) You are coming from the Droid RAZR MAXX, which is the only android with a bigger battery.
3) You have a rogue app that is draining your battery life that you never used before.
4) You are using excessive amounts of LTE data, and you came from a phone without LTE.
If those apply to you, there's your answer. If they don't, you may just have a bad device or battery.
You really need to be more specific when stating something as subjective as battery life is terrible. May I suggest you post screenshots of your battery stats so that you can give some insight to why your battery life is terrible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you elaborate more on bad device or battery? Is that a common issue?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
SkizzMcNizz said:
Can you elaborate more on bad device or battery? Is that a common issue?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty much every device is unique, even though they are produced and assembled in identical fashion. It's possible for a device to have faulty software or internal hardware from the factory that could drain battery, and it's also possible for it to be shipped with a faulty battery. It's not a common issue, but also not unheard of. If nothing in his usage of the device is out of the ordinary, then it's possible he received a faulty device or battery, and should exchange it.
Sent from my SAMSUNG G-Note I717 using Tapatalk
Install cpu spy and make sure you are going to deep sleep. For weeks I couldn't make it through the day and once I realized that the phone wasn't sleeping I found the app that was causing it and deleted it. I get great battery now but still reboot every morning because my original charging cable was lost so my phone will not sleep until I reboot.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
I would say battery life can be defined by screen on time only.
Brightness and lte makes much difference.
Anyways just refer to other battey forums. Search helps.
Sent from my SGH-I717R using XDA
Compared to what???
If you are trying to compare your Note to Apple itoy that is like trying to compare pink tricycle with pink tassels to a Corvette ZR1. No comparison at all, definitely more than apples and oranges. Having owed, well still own till I sell it, Dell Streak only other 5 inch screen out there. Agree it is still not apples to apples (or vette to vette), but Shelby Mustang to ZR1 and can say the battery performance is about the same. I upgraded my Steak to a 2400 mAh battery and had all services on and OC'ed to 1.9 ghz, yes I know single core, standard definition resolution, etc, but as close as you can get in 5 inch screen world. So far the 2500 mAh and stock ROM, with everything on, battery time is relatively the same. Will say only phone that might compare is Samsung Skyrocket HD that is set to come out this month(?), inside they are close to the same, but the screen is 4.6 inch super Amole plus.
Can anyone help me out? This is my battery on battery monitor widget. It says 1500 mah. I've only had my phone off the charger for 3 hours and I'm on 33 percent and watching it drop fast.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Sinful Animosity said:
Can anyone help me out? This is my battery on battery monitor widget. It says 1500 mah. I've only had my phone off the charger for 3 hours and I'm on 33 percent and watching it drop fast.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery Monitor Widget guesses at the capacity (or hard codes it). Go into the apps settings and you can tell it the battery capacity.
Also, make sure your using decent batteries. The two for $15 deals on ebay are not direct replacements. Stick with oem or brand names llike Anker.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk

[Q] How prevalent are the battery/power issues w/ the new kernel?

I'm thinking about flashing on the the roms based on the latest leak. Just wanted to know if everyone was having reduced battery life from it or just a select few?
I have had better battery since the upgrade.
GrayTheWolf said:
I have had better battery since the upgrade.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Mines been about the same since the leak was installed, no major changes.
I am running the leaked ICS RUU from last month and my battery life is a lot better than when I was on Gingerbread.
3g enabled: same. 4g: better
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA
Better battery for me. You should have done a poll
Sent from my rooted HRC Rezound
My battery life is better. But it will vary based on a lot of factors. I did somewhere around 30 firmware installs for other people. About 20 - 24 of those users have kept up with me. 2 are having really bad battery life and one more is poor but jot terrible, the really bad ones are both heavy users. They have high temp issues especially when downloading and streaming. Because I can't remotely look over their settings like I could on a computer, I can only deal with it further with some back and fourth trial and error while on gtalk. I know some is kernel related, as to why they have the heat and battery problems and others don't, I havent nailed it down.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium

Is my rezound just defective?

So I've been struggling with battery life on this rezound since I purchased it. It does get hot every now and then sometimes for no reason. I was waiting for aosp to come along to determine if it was just sense or the phone itself but since its not fully operational and makes my rezound hot as hell, I've stuck with sense roms for my day to day. The following screen shots are venom Rom desensed by me, including no weather, or facebook. The only thing syncing manually is gmail. That's it. No gaming here either. Downloaded a 7mb song, listened to mp3s with headphones and cruised the web a bunch.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
That's about what I had using viperrez, although it seems your phone is discharging quickly when screen is off. I'd recommend under clocking when screen off to about 500mhz that works for me. Doesn't help with the screen on time though
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
metalmike6 said:
So I've been struggling with battery life on this rezound since I purchased it. It does get hot every now and then sometimes for no reason. I was waiting for aosp to come along to determine if it was just sense or the phone itself but since its not fully operational and makes my rezound hot as hell, I've stuck with sense roms for my day to day. The following screen shots are venom Rom desensed by me, including no weather, or facebook. The only thing syncing manually is gmail. That's it. No gaming here either. Downloaded a 7mb song, listened to mp3s with headphones and cruised the web a bunch.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.) sense 4 is a MAJOR battery hog. id advise not to use ut unless your showing off
2.) i usually get 2hrs screen on, so id say NOT defective
3.) if you want like an extra 30-60 mins, try aosp. its fast and good on battery
hope this helps
Thanks for the replies guys I appreciate it. I did forget to mention something though... This is with the extended battery I know 2 hours would be about right on standard but I would think the extended should yield more no?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
metalmike6 said:
Thanks for the replies guys I appreciate it. I did forget to mention something though... This is with the extended battery I know 2 hours would be about right on standard but I would think the extended should yield more no?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most likely yes, isn't the extended battery 1.5x? Either way, battery consumption is hard to perfect. Like I said maybe underclock or find a battery saving build. Prop script to try I know system tuner pro has one built in.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
I thought we shouldn't underlock yet because of the perflock bug? Or did that get fixed?
carngeX said:
I thought we shouldn't underlock yet because of the perflock bug? Or did that get fixed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some people experience overheating, I personally have never experienced negative effects from using a cpu governor
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app

Eco Mode

I noticed we don't have any threads about Eco Mode. I would like to hear other users feedback / experiences?
My experience:
I turned on Eco Mode earlier this morning and haven't notice any difference performance wise. Battery wise I have seen about a 10% difference to what I would be about now. (10 hours and down to 65%, whereas I probably would be down to ~55%). From what I understand Eco Mode shuts down 2 cores, essentially making it a dual-core. I ran two quadrants (Not that these matter) with Eco Mode off 7500, and with Eco Mode on 5500 (2000 difference). I also played some games and couldn't notice anything. Honestly, I wouldn't even be able to tell if it was on or off without doing a quadrant.
Based on my experience with Eco Mode I would recommend it be turned on. At the end of a charge cycle there is potential to save 20% battery life at no cost to performance (visually). As always YMMV.
For the most part I don't see much difference. I know the phone runs cooler most of the time and a tad bit more battery life. A little bit if screen lag sometimes with it on. Most of what you will ever do with this phone won't need 4 cores so it's a nice addition.
whiteguypl said:
For the most part I don't see much difference. I know the phone runs cooler most of the time and a tad bit more battery life. A little bit if screen lag sometimes with it on. Most of what you will ever do with this phone won't need 4 cores so it's a nice addition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. Its very nice its there. Hopefully kernels/roms will incorporate it on aosp.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Joecascio2000 said:
Agreed. Its very nice its there. Hopefully kernels/roms will incorporate it on aosp.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thing is, they need the source code for that. Don't think LG has given up the source code for their kernel yet.
Joecascio2000 said:
Agreed. Its very nice its there. Hopefully kernels/roms will incorporate it on aosp.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope we see this as well. I read a review of the Nexus 4 a bit ago over at Ars Technica, at one point they compared the performance of it to our LGOG and found the Nexus 4 faster "out the gate" but would stutter after being under load for a while (think playing a somewhat graphically intensive game). The reviewer concluded the kernels used in the Nexus 4 allowed the processor to run full boar without much of a governor so it would start to approach the thermal barrier and subsequently hindering performance. The LGOG kernels, however, were more restricted and allowed for more substantiated performance, resulting in better battery life and a cooler phone.
See review here:
arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/11/nexus-4-two-thirds-of-a-great-phone/
I remember reading that article, too. I don't think LG gets enough credit for their Android "skin" and the thought they put into this phone. It's not perfect, but they did a really good job in my opinion.
A
I really do believe that Google rushed android 4.2. They should have added some kind of power management to the Nexus 4...
that which the hardware people giveth...the software people taketh away.
or...
you may not need all four cores today, but before end of life i'll bet you're glad you have em. i remember folks saying "what on earth would you need 512K of RAM for?" and "Why did you get a 100GB Hard Drive, you'll never need all that space."
Will Eco Mode keep your phone in dual-core mode no matter what, or does it dynamically turn cores on/off based on what you're doing?
It's dynamic AFAIK.
whiteguypl said:
It's dynamic AFAIK.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In that case, there seems like there is no reason NOT to have this enabled.
Just plugged in. With eco mode I got 1 day 45 minutes, with 3 hours 35 minutes screen on time. Much better than what I normally get.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Joecascio2000 said:
Just plugged in. With eco mode I got 1 day 45 minutes, with 3 hours 35 minutes screen on time. Much better than what I normally get.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That still sucks IMO. There still need to be major optimizations to AndroidOS. No way it should be my biggest battery user every day.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Jank4AU said:
That still sucks IMO. There still need to be major optimizations to AndroidOS. No way it should be my biggest battery user every day.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Me thinks there is no way to make you happy.
Sent from my LG-E970
Jank4AU said:
That still sucks IMO. There still need to be major optimizations to AndroidOS. No way it should be my biggest battery user every day.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The os is the biggest battery user only because the screen is using very little power by comparison, skewing percentages.
chrisphoenix7 said:
The os is the biggest battery user only because the screen is using very little power by comparison, skewing percentages.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not deep sleeping the way it should...If you use 3.5 hours of screen time, that should be your highest consumer of battery power, by far.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app
---------- Post added at 09:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:07 AM ----------
DraginMagik said:
Me thinks there is no way to make you happy.
Sent from my LG-E970
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perhaps I doth protest too much? :angel:
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app
Jank4AU said:
It's not deep sleeping the way it should...If you use 3.5 hours of screen time, that should be your highest consumer of battery power, by far.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app
---------- Post added at 09:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:07 AM ----------
Perhaps I doth protest too much? :angel:
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see where he showed the battery stats during that day of activity. So how do you know it's not the biggest source of power drain? Am I missing something here?
IrateCustomer said:
I don't see where he showed the battery stats during that day of activity. So how do you know it's not the biggest source of power drain? Am I missing something here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would be guessing as many people have complained about AndroidOS being out of control. However, what I was referencing was my post just above that where I said AOS should never be "MY" biggest source of battery consumption. If I get 3.5 hours of screen-on time, the battery would necessarily use more power than anything else unless there is an issue. No matter when I measure the battery stats, android os is the biggest consumer of battery. Right now I have 5hrs 35mins of charger. 23% screen power consumption with 2hrs 5 mins on time. However, I've 41% android battery consumption with on time of 3hrs 43 mins. It's a ROM or kernel thing. Not blaming our devs, they're doing the best with what they have released to them. However, there is something wrong as we should all be getting better battery life than we are with this size battery.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
After having several android devices, I know that if screen on time is over 2.5 hours it should always be the highest battery usage. Also, Android OS should never be above 20%. If it is, there is a problem.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
If you look at battery posts from nexus 4 users. You will see their android os % at about 6 where ours is usually 40%. Its definitely a software issue.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium

Help...Battery Life Problem

Like the title says,my amaze has a very low battery life.It us an unbranded amaze running "Energy" rom with Stock kernel.
I am having only 3-4 hours battery life(with screen on).It was good with gingerbread but after flashing ICS on it(unofficial way),it got worse.I tried other roms as well e.g "Android revolution","Energy with both faux and stock kernel but battery life was still same.
I also calibrated the battery.
Now you guys have to tell me what to do.I tried my best.
Thanks in advance.
umair42 said:
Like the title says,my amaze has a very low battery life.It us an unbranded amaze running "Energy" rom with Stock kernel.
I am having only 3-4 hours battery life(with screen on).It was good with gingerbread but after flashing ICS on it(unofficial way),it got worse.I tried other roms as well e.g "Android revolution","Energy with both faux and stock kernel but battery life was still same.
I also calibrated the battery.
Now you guys have to tell me what to do.I tried my best.
Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3-4 hour screen time is good. But if that's not enough for you, you can try the 3600 mah mugen power battery
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
filthygoat223996 said:
3-4 hour screen time is good. But if that's not enough for you, you can try the 3600 mah mugen power battery
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3-4 hours is not good time.I personally use Xperia U and it has great battery time(6-7 hours screen on).And I don't want extended battery because with it,phone looks fat and ugly.
umair42 said:
3-4 hours is not good time.I personally use Xperia U and it has great battery time(6-7 hours screen on).And I don't want extended battery because with it,phone looks fat and ugly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Xperia u has a smaller screen,a lower clocked processor, you can't expect the amaze to be the same in terms of battery life. It's like comparing the mileage of a Honda civic and a mustang. There is no magical way to double your battery life, but you can lower screen brightness, underclock, etc
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
filthygoat223996 said:
The Xperia u has a smaller screen,a lower clocked processor, you can't expect the amaze to be the same in terms of battery life. It's like comparing the mileage of a Honda civic and a mustang. There is no magical way to double your battery life, but you can lower screen brightness, underclock, etc
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it was not as bad on gingerbread as it is on ICS.It became worse only after updating to ICS.

Categories

Resources