I need a better cloud storage app for windows phone..
Because I know Skydrive won't let you upload nude content to the cloud or else it'll get removed with a chance of you getting banned.
Yes, I have pictures that I want to upload to the cloud like that, so what? Skydrive is a great cloud service, but the privacy is what bugs me.
I wish Google Drive was on windows phone but the only two apps of Drive on the WP8 are terrible and hardly work.
Anyone have any advice?
Ehm..didn't know skydrive removed nude pics ( actually I doubt that ).
Btw just set up a dropbox account and use a third party app in the market...
Inviato dal mio ST26i con Tapatalk 2
Taurenking said:
Ehm..didn't know skydrive removed nude pics ( actually I doubt that ).
Btw just set up a dropbox account and use a third party app in the market...
Inviato dal mio ST26i con Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Skydrive actually does. Had a whole topic going on tweakers.net (dutch/belgium site) about a guy that saved some pictures of his GF with the result of his outlook account being perma-banned.
Taurenking said:
Ehm..didn't know skydrive removed nude pics ( actually I doubt that ).
Btw just set up a dropbox account and use a third party app in the market...
Inviato dal mio ST26i con Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is taken from the agreement from Microsoft services.
"You will not upload, post, transmit, transfer, distribute or facilitate distribution of any content (including text, images, sound, video, data, information or software) or otherwise use the service in a way that:
depicts nudity of any sort including full or partial human nudity or nudity in non-human forms such as cartoons, fantasy art or manga.
incites, advocates, or expresses pornography, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity, hatred, bigotry, racism, or gratuitous violence."
Yes, they do not allow it.
I wish I could find a dropbox app that had multi-select.. I have a lot of pictures and files I want to save. :/
nhvider said:
This is taken from the agreement from Microsoft services.
"You will not upload, post, transmit, transfer, distribute or facilitate distribution of any content (including text, images, sound, video, data, information or software) or otherwise use the service in a way that:
depicts nudity of any sort including full or partial human nudity or nudity in non-human forms such as cartoons, fantasy art or manga.
incites, advocates, or expresses pornography, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity, hatred, bigotry, racism, or gratuitous violence."
Yes, they do not allow it.
I wish I could find a dropbox app that had multi-select.. I have a lot of pictures and files I want to save. :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about Box.com ? They got an app as well and it works very well. I do not really like Skydrive. Ther´s no privacy so i switched to Box and its perfect for me.
Manafest said:
What about Box.com ? They got an app as well and it works very well. I do not really like Skydrive. Ther´s no privacy so i switched to Box and its perfect for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
YESSS. Thank you! I never even knew about this. Thanks a lot.
nhvider said:
This is taken from the agreement from Microsoft services.
"You will not upload, post, transmit, transfer, distribute or facilitate distribution of any content (including text, images, sound, video, data, information or software) or otherwise use the service in a way that:
depicts nudity of any sort including full or partial human nudity or nudity in non-human forms such as cartoons, fantasy art or manga.
incites, advocates, or expresses pornography, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity, hatred, bigotry, racism, or gratuitous violence."
Yes, they do not allow it.
I wish I could find a dropbox app that had multi-select.. I have a lot of pictures and files I want to save. :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow i should really start to read those terms of agreement...and seriously??? Microsoft?? Looking into my stuff??? That's not cool at all...
Inviato dal mio ST26i con Tapatalk 2
Taurenking said:
Wow i should really start to read those terms of agreement...and seriously??? Microsoft?? Looking into my stuff??? That's not cool at all...
Inviato dal mio ST26i con Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All cloud-storage solutions look through your stuff.
*sigh*
taken from
https://www.box.com/static/html/terms.html
section 8, paragraph (h):
(h) use the Service to: (i) engage in any unlawful or fraudulent activity or perpetrate a hoax or engage in phishing schemes or forgery or other similar falsification or manipulation of data; (ii) send unsolicited or unauthorized junk mail, spam, chain letters, pyramid schemes or any other form of duplicative or unsolicited messages, whether commercial or otherwise; (iii) advertise or promote a commercial product or service that is not available through Box unless your account is subject to a small office, home office, business or enterprise subscription; (iv) store or transmit inappropriate Content, such as Content: (1) containing unlawful, defamatory, threatening, pornographic, abusive, libelous or otherwise objectionable material of any kind or nature, (2) containing any material that encourages conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, or (3) that violates the intellectual property rights or rights to the publicity or privacy of others; (iv) store or transmit any Content that contains or is used to initiate a denial of service attack, software viruses or other harmful or deleterious computer code, files or programs such as Trojan horses, worms, time bombs, cancelbots, or spyware; or (v) abuse, harass, stalk or otherwise violate the legal rights of a third party;
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good luck trying to explain their legal team that your nudes aren't "objectionable material", as nebulous as that definition is
look, you're subscribing to a free service in order to store sensitive data, and you are expecting privacy? ahahahahahahaha :silly:
and most hilariously for the guy wishing for the comfort and security of his trusted big brother google (the biggest oxymoron ever), be aware that google not only will snitch you to the cops if they feel it's appropriate -see point 3- but also will keep the pictures for jerking off afterwards:
By using Google services, you acknowledge and agree that Google may access, preserve, and disclose your account information and any Content associated with that account if required to do so by law or in a good faith belief that such access preservation or disclosure is reasonably necessary to: (a) satisfy any applicable law, regulation, legal process or enforceable governmental request, (b) enforce the Terms, including investigation of potential violations hereof, (c) detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or technical issues (including, without limitation, the filtering of spam), or (d) protect against imminent harm to the rights, property or safety of Google, its users or the public as required or permitted by law.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"good faith belief" being legalese for "whenever we want"
When you upload or otherwise submit content to our Services, you give Google (and those we work with) a worldwide license to use, host, store, reproduce, modify, create derivative works (such as those resulting from translations, adaptations or other changes we make so that your content works better with our Services), communicate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute such content. The rights you grant in this license are for the limited purpose of operating, promoting, and improving our Services, and to develop new ones. This license continues even if you stop using our Services
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but seriously, where's your common sense guys?
Related
Hello,
According to the Android Design Principles
Never lose my stuff
Save what people took time to create and let them access it from anywhere. Remember settings, personal touches, and creations across phones, tablets, and computers. It makes upgrading the easiest thing in the world.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
which I think is great. The app I'm designing involves storing photos and data about them. Is there a good way to back this up? I could sync with a webservice I could write/host, but then I'm opening myself up to potentially large bandwidth/storage charges.
I considered using drop box or something, but that would require my non tech savvy users to sign up. Is there any easy way to integrate the google cloud service (as my users will of course have a google account)? What do people normally do when they want to meet this design principle?
Many thanks
Russ_T said:
Hello,
According to the Android Design Principles
which I think is great. The app I'm designing involves storing photos and data about them. Is there a good way to back this up? I could sync with a webservice I could write/host, but then I'm opening myself up to potentially large bandwidth/storage charges.
I considered using drop box or something, but that would require my non tech savvy users to sign up. Is there any easy way to integrate the google cloud service (as my users will of course have a google account)? What do people normally do when they want to meet this design principle?
Many thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe there is an api for backing up user data to Google drive and since users will have a Google account they automatically have Google drive (Your app will have to request permissions to access users Google account I believe). This would be the easiest way to implement things as the drive api is a native part of Android, and you don't have to worry about bandwidth and hosting storage. In the past people have hosted there own storage for users to used and then usually tie this to an account users have to create. Overall, like I said I'd look into using the Google drive api.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
shimp208 said:
I believe there is an api for backing up user data to Google drive and since users will have a Google account they automatically have Google drive (Your app will have to request permissions to access users Google account I believe). This would be the easiest way to implement things as the drive api is a native part of Android, and you don't have to worry about bandwidth and hosting storage. In the past people have hosted there own storage for users to used and then usually tie this to an account users have to create. Overall, like I said I'd look into using the Google drive api.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks very much. A bit of an oversight on my part so I'll have a look through the API and see what it offers.
I do intend to charge a subscription for my app/service ultimately, but I think I need to make storage space the users problem to save myself sleepless nights.
I'll investigate and post back here what I find. If anyone can give me a link to an article on this I'd appreciate it.
Thanks
Russ_T said:
Thanks very much. A bit of an oversight on my part so I'll have a look through the API and see what it offers.
I do intend to charge a subscription for my app/service ultimately, but I think I need to make storage space the users problem to save myself sleepless nights.
I'll investigate and post back here what I find. If anyone can give me a link to an article on this I'd appreciate it.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is the official Google documentation on using the Google Drive Api:
https://developers.google.com/drive/
Check out this article on network storage and android:
http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/data/data-storage.html#netw
As well as this article on using the backup api and cloud sync:
http://developer.android.com/training/cloudsync/index.html
Also since you talked about eventually charging a subscription fee here is the official android developer documentation on that as well:
http://developer.android.com/guide/google/play/billing/billing_subscriptions.html
Wonderful, thank you very much indeed! I will give those a good read over when I get chance and let you know how I get on. It seems this could definitely be the answer, saving me money concerns and allowing my app to be multi user and backed up.
What I need to do is get my head around how I will use the cloud storage to allow my app to be multi user. Potentially I can make my database file based, and sync between two devices that way. My only trouble is when both devices are editing the same file / working on the same thing. I want the app to work offline, as I don't want connection issues to affect its usage.
Hmmm, I'll give it some thought.
Thanks again!
Hi all,
I'd like to share great news. Sicher, our free secure messenger finally comes to Windows Phone.
Sicher features true end-to-end encryption of both text messages and file attachments. With anonymous push notifications and the ability to set a timer for when messages will self-destruct, Sicher also includes password protection for the app itself.
Please try Sicher and share your feedback in this post.
FairyMary
Sicher Team
App is free, store link is here: EDIT: Removed because this thing looks like a scam and its description is a lie
I haven't been able to find a lot of info about how the app works (I'm talking about at a very technical level). My general advice regarding crypto code is to open it up for review, either publicly or by a professional security assessment firm (disclaimer: I work at one of those). If the code is already open for review somewhere, that would be awesome; if not, I recommend getting in touch with some external security experts (same disclaimer, but I can provide contact info if you want). The Internet is full of things that the developer claimed (and often even sincerely believed) were secure.
Aaaand just for fun, I decided to take a look at the app and see if there was anything obviously wrong. Let's start with the presence of no fewer than *three* advertisement networks, shall we? Begun Advertising is Russian and Google-owned, Google AdMob is self-explanatory, as is Microsoft Advertising Mobile. Your store description claims you
don’t use any advertising engines
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
. Did you really think nobody would check this?
WTF are you trying to pull here?!? I can't think of any way to faster burn trust in a "secure" app than to make a claim that is trivially disprovable in a way that benefits nobody except you.
I'll come right out and say it: Sicher looks like a scam!
Oh look, a Facebook library as well. Totally expected to see that, given that you
don’t integrate social network SDKs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, and before anybody asks about responsible disclosure, that's for when there's an unintentional bug in somebody's code. This just looks like pure exploitation of your users! (I say "looks like" because I haven't actually decompiled the code to see if those libraries are being used, but it's hard to imagine why you'd have them otherwise...). The only responsible way to disclose malware is to do it publicly, and this looks malicious.
EDIT: I'll give you 24 hours to give me a good argument why I shouldn't report my findings to the stores themselves.
Time's up. You actually got over 48 hours because I was busy yesterday. Hope not too many people got scammed and tracked by your "secure" and "private" app...
Hey @GoodDayToDie, unfortunately I don't know where else to ask this, since you seem to be really interested (and skilled) in this topic, what messengers do you consider secure? WhatsApp is obvious, the only ones on Windows Phone I know of that come to my mind are Telegram and (soon) Threema.
What do you think about the two? I have basically no knowledge, but what seems odd to me about Threema is their faqs answer to "what about MITM?" they just say they use certs, hardcoded in the app. Aren't they with their servers in control then? How I understand this, the Threema servers could perfectly perform a MITM attack.
And Telegram has a completely confusing protocol.. So please share your thoughts!
I have no personal knowledge of one, sadly. Take anything I say here with a huge grain of salt (including the fact that Sicher looks like a scam; I haven't actually verified that it *uses* all those ad networks + Facebook that it integrates, just that it has them) as I'm not spending the time & effort for a full security review of these apps at this time.
Threema actually looks quite good.
Pros:
They don't try to implement the crypto themselves (they use NaCl, which is both written by people who know what they're doing, and well-reviewed).
The design of their end-to-end solution makes sense (it connects through the server since phone networks won't allow incoming/direct connections, but the messages are encrypted to only the recipient and doesn't require that the recipient be online to receive the message).
They are relatively open about how things work (although those *could* be lies; I haven't pulled the app apart).
It is possible for the user to verify the key of another user.
Cons:
They don't have Perfect Forward Secrecy on messages. PFS would require that the intended recipient be online at the start of any given conversation (to negotiate the ephemeral keys) so this isn't terribly surprising, but it is disappointing. An attacker (including a government agency) who gets access to your private key could decrypt historical traffic to you if they'd recorded it.
The app is proprietary; there's nothing stopping them from pushing a malicious update.
The server supplies the public keys of users; until such time as the user validates the other party's key (which is difficult to do except in person) the server could have sent a public key that the server has the private key for (instead of the user's own public key) and then MitM the user's traffic. This would break down when verified though, unless the app lied about the result of the verification process (you don't actually see the key itself).
To address your concern about MitM, the app says they use certificate pinning (a standard and very smart security measure, assuming they did it right) for app-to-server communication, so nobody (including third-party security engineers) can MitM the app traffic. They also claim to use PFS. However, if the server itself is untrusted (i.e. some government thugs show up to demand access, although bear in mind that apparently the servers are all in Switzerland) then the server could give you the wrong public key for a user you try and add, allowing the server to MitM you. Also, the company could push an update that is malicious.
The only protection against the server-sends-wrong-key threat is to either require that the user manually import all keys (think PGP minus keyservers and assuming trustworthy key exchanges) or exactly verify the key (i.e. personally ensure that it matches the other user's key by actually checking the bytes or at least the hash). The only protection against the malicious update is to make the source code available and have a method by which users can either compile it themselves (though see "Reflections on Trusting Trust") and/or have a way to verify the application binaries.
I'll look at Telegram later. For the moment, though, I would loosely recommend Threema once it's available. There's also Skype, of course, but while it was decompiled once long ago (and found to use secure encryption, although some non-crypto vulns were found) that was many versions ago (and, in particular, was before Microsoft bought them).
My app named iFreeMovies is a simple list of youtube movies. It's not a playlist, it's searches the movies that orders in a list and you can watch them in youtube player api v3. Using an open source imdb api you can also get some informations in a webview. Unfortunately today I get this mail:
REASON FOR REMOVAL: Violation of the intellectual property and impersonation or deceptive behavior provisions of the Content Policy. Please refer to the IP infringement and impersonation policy help article for more information.
Your app and/or elements of its listing on Google Play, including title, description, logo(s), or promotional screenshots must not include unauthorized usage of protected works belonging to a third party.
Your app icon and promotional screenshots must not contain images that appear confusingly similar to existing products.
This particular app has been disabled as a policy strike. If your developer account is still in good standing, you may revise and upload a policy compliant version of this application as a new package name.
This notification also serves as notice for remaining, unsuspended violations in your catalog, and you may avoid further app suspensions by immediately unpublishing any apps in violation of (but not limited to) the above policy. Once you have resolved any existing violations, you may republish the app(s) at will. Before publishing applications, please ensure your apps’ compliance with the Developer Distribution Agreement and Content Policy.
All violations are tracked. Serious or repeated violations of any nature will result in the termination of your developer account, and investigation and possible termination of related Google accounts. If your account is terminated, payments will cease and Google may recover the proceeds of any past sales and the cost of any associated fees (such as chargebacks and payment transaction fees) from you.
If you feel we have made this determination in error, you can visit the Google Play Help Center article for additional information regarding this removal.
I don't understand. So since I'm not an expert developer, in order to learn, I would like that someone clarify me what's happened. In particular my great question is: What's the reason? The logo, the name, the company name ( I wrote Tuxmind as nickname) .
Help me to figure out, please!
I'm betting it's either you using YouTube images or the name. Apple has a habit of pulling this with alot of inames
I use YouTube thumbnails in the list. It's a possibility offered by YouTube api v3. So Could I change the name from ifree movies to free movies and solve the problem? But I will loose my users. Sigh!
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Free mobile app
Well I'll be honest. The title free movies is miss leading. All your app does is give you a list of YouTube videos. The name implies they could download those movies which is illegal.
Thank you for your answer. Then Free streaming movies or Free Underground Movies... Or something Like that you can't refer to download some Giles. Isn't it?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Free mobile app
maddom73 said:
Thank you for your answer. Then Free streaming movies or Free Underground Movies... Or something Like that you can't refer to download some Giles. Isn't it?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See your app doesnt do any of that. It doesnt stream movies, and it still implys that you can get movies for free.
Your better off with something like Youtube list or something along those lines.
Watch Movies Tube?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Free mobile app
Using a name that is similar to any other brand would get suspended. For example "iFreeMovies" imitates the Apple brand; "Youtube List" or "Watch Movies Tube" would imitate the YouTube Brand.
today I submitted an update for my movies app. I dont know if I can link the app, but basically it is similar to the more pupular MovieMate. My app allows the user to browse movies, read descriptions, add them to watch list and so on.
The update was rejected since according to the useless guys at google I'm violating intellectual property, while all the other movie apps on the play store apparently are ok. It frustrates me since I put in MONTHS of work for this app and got very few downloads in the first month. And now i cant even submit updates.
The data is fetched through TheMovieDatabase and I give them credits both in the app and in the store description. The API are explicitly saying that I'm ALLOWED to use their information for commercial purposes.
Now I want to appeal. What should I write to the google guys to get the update accepted?
cececefotl said:
today I submitted an update for my movies app. I dont know if I can link the app, but basically it is similar to the more pupular MovieMate. My app allows the user to browse movies, read descriptions, add them to watch list and so on.
The update was rejected since according to the useless guys at google I'm violating intellectual property, while all the other movie apps on the play store apparently are ok. It frustrates me since I put in MONTHS of work for this app and got very few downloads in the first month. And now i cant even submit updates.
The data is fetched through TheMovieDatabase and I give them credits both in the app and in the store description. The API are explicitly saying that I'm ALLOWED to use their information for commercial purposes.
Now I want to appeal. What should I write to the google guys to get the update accepted?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tell them to give you the reasons WHY they rejected your app, then, you can work on fixing these reasons.
This is from the email
I reviewed Movie and Tv suggestions, com.dcs.shows, and had to reject it because of an unauthorized use of copyrighted content. If you submitted an update, the previous version of your app is still live on Google Play.
Here’s how you can submit your app for another review:
Remove any content owned by a third party from your app. For example, your app contains: several images of movie posters like "Mad Max & Suicide Squad" in the phone screenshots and within the app experience. Affected Translations: en_US
Read through the Unauthorized Use of Copyrighted Content article for more details and examples.
Make sure your app is compliant with the Impersonation and Intellectual Property policy and all other policies listed in the Developer Program Policies. Remember that additional enforcement could occur if there are further policy issues with your apps.
Sign in to your Developer Console and submit your app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this my app: github (dot) com / fermatijoe / shows2
cececefotl said:
This is from the email
this my app: github (dot) com / fermatijoe / shows2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, these movies are copyrighted and you can't use them unless you have permission. To be honest, if you start such a big project that requires 2 months of coding, at least read through the rules before posting it.
RAZERZDAHACKER said:
Okay, these movies are copyrighted and you can't use them unless you have permission. To be honest, if you start such a big project that requires 2 months of coding, at least read through the rules before posting it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about the other 1000 apps that do the same thing? Look for Movie Mate on the play store. The first screen is a huge Mad max poster. And the appe is paid and has milions of downloads.
cececefotl said:
What about the other 1000 apps that do the same thing? Look for Movie Mate on the play store. The first screen is a huge Mad max poster. And the appe is paid and has milions of downloads.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? That app has copyright allowment.
Hey guys, I tried to use undeleter app on my Pocophone F1 after flashing, maybe it might recover something. (trying won't hurt right? hehe)
In the end, it did not recover anything useful. What bothered me was, I found MANY deleted screenshots which I have not taken at all. It's like every minute a new screenshot is performed and then deleted since there were tons of it from just like a moment ago, and most of them are partly corrupted which shows overwriting.
Can someone else try this? It needs root permissions
What I did was
Open Undeleter > Restore Files > Internal Storage > Deep Scan > Tick "JPG" > Scan
Can you share with me if you also found screenshots which you DID NOT capture?
Here's the playstore link for undeleter:
Undeleter Recover Files & Data
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=fahrbot.apps.undelete&hl=en
I'm not affiliated with nor advertising Undeleter.
Note: It has ads.
Also, does anyone know what process or app is doing this? And if there are some workarounds. I'm not sure if this is just a virus I obtained since I just rooted my phone several days ago using Magisk which I obtained from their GitHub page and official Stock ROM from bigota.miui
Here is a sample screenshot.
Look closely on the thumbnails, and you can see that those are screenshots. But I didn't take any of those. Whenever I use Undeleter at different times, it shows more screenshots which are just moments before using it again and those which were found before as well.
aztigin009 said:
Here is a sample screenshot.
Look closely on the thumbnails, and you can see that those are screenshots. But I didn't take any of those. Whenever I use Undeleter at different times, it shows more screenshots which are just moments before using it again and those which were found before as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks interesting. I have not used undelete app ever. But the screenshot might be some kind of thumbnail auto generated, just like from video (by vlc etc). But what purpose would it serve, sure to question.
I read the privacy policy of the undelete app. On the last item (number 6), which is all in capital letters by the way, it seems to me that they are saying something like (in my own words) they can disclose all your personal info if you tamper with their app. Maybe the deleted screenshots are an effect of that 'security mrasure'.
Corona is a *****... (my apologies if your name is Corona).
---------- Post added at 07:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:37 AM ----------
This is the part I am talking about:
FAHRBOT PRI MAY DISCLOSE ANY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION IN CASE IT BECOMES NECESSARY TO DEFEND ITS JURIDICAL RIGHTS. IN CASE YOUR ACTIONS LEAD TO SUSPICION OF TANGIBLE OR ASSUMED SABOTEUR ACTIONS OR POSE A POTENTIAL THREAT TO ANY PERSON'S PHYSICAL SAFETY OR ANY OTHER GRAVE CRIME, ALL YOUR KNOWN INFORMATION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PERSONAL DETAILS, IP ADDRESSES) MAY BE DISCLOSED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT ORGANIZATIONS AND/OR REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ISP WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE. IN CASE OF ANY EVIDENCE OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF FILES CONTAINING MATERIALS WHICH APPEAR TO INVOLVE CHILD EXPLOITATION, ALL KNOWN INFORMATION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PERSONAL DETAILS, IP ADDRESSES) WILL BE DIRECTED TO THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING & EXPLOITED CHILDREN AND/OR HOTLINE COMBATING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY ON THE INTERNET, AS WELL AS LAW ENFORCEMENT ORGANIZATIONS AND/OR REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ISP WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE. DISCLOSURE OF YOUR INFORMATION CAN BE LAWFUL AS A RESULT OF A LEGAL PROCESS.
Corona is a *****... (my apologies if your name is Corona).
This is the part of the privacy policy of the undelete app, I am talking about:
FAHRBOT PRI MAY DISCLOSE ANY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION IN CASE IT BECOMES NECESSARY TO DEFEND ITS JURIDICAL RIGHTS. IN CASE YOUR ACTIONS LEAD TO SUSPICION OF TANGIBLE OR ASSUMED SABOTEUR ACTIONS OR POSE A POTENTIAL THREAT TO ANY PERSON'S PHYSICAL SAFETY OR ANY OTHER GRAVE CRIME, ALL YOUR KNOWN INFORMATION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PERSONAL DETAILS, IP ADDRESSES) MAY BE DISCLOSED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT ORGANIZATIONS AND/OR REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ISP WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE. IN CASE OF ANY EVIDENCE OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF FILES CONTAINING MATERIALS WHICH APPEAR TO INVOLVE CHILD EXPLOITATION, ALL KNOWN INFORMATION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PERSONAL DETAILS, IP ADDRESSES) WILL BE DIRECTED TO THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING & EXPLOITED CHILDREN AND/OR HOTLINE COMBATING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY ON THE INTERNET, AS WELL AS LAW ENFORCEMENT ORGANIZATIONS AND/OR REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ISP WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE. DISCLOSURE OF YOUR INFORMATION CAN BE LAWFUL AS A RESULT OF A LEGAL PROCESS.
Corona is a *****... (my apologies if your name is Corona).
ko3st said:
I read the privacy policy of the undelete app. On the last item (number 6), which is all in capital letters by the way, it seems to me that they are saying something like (in my own words) they can disclose all your personal info if you tamper with their app. Maybe the deleted screenshots are an effect of that 'security mrasure'.
Corona is a *****... (my apologies if your name is Corona).
---------- Post added at 07:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:37 AM ----------
This is the part I am talking about:
FAHRBOT PRI MAY DISCLOSE ANY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION IN CASE IT BECOMES NECESSARY TO DEFEND ITS JURIDICAL RIGHTS. IN CASE YOUR ACTIONS LEAD TO SUSPICION OF TANGIBLE OR ASSUMED SABOTEUR ACTIONS OR POSE A POTENTIAL THREAT TO ANY PERSON'S PHYSICAL SAFETY OR ANY OTHER GRAVE CRIME, ALL YOUR KNOWN INFORMATION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PERSONAL DETAILS, IP ADDRESSES) MAY BE DISCLOSED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT ORGANIZATIONS AND/OR REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ISP WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE. IN CASE OF ANY EVIDENCE OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF FILES CONTAINING MATERIALS WHICH APPEAR TO INVOLVE CHILD EXPLOITATION, ALL KNOWN INFORMATION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PERSONAL DETAILS, IP ADDRESSES) WILL BE DIRECTED TO THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING & EXPLOITED CHILDREN AND/OR HOTLINE COMBATING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY ON THE INTERNET, AS WELL AS LAW ENFORCEMENT ORGANIZATIONS AND/OR REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ISP WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE. DISCLOSURE OF YOUR INFORMATION CAN BE LAWFUL AS A RESULT OF A LEGAL PROCESS.
Corona is a *****... (my apologies if your name is Corona).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think no, because the screenshots included pictures before my first install of undeleter.
digimith said:
Looks interesting. I have not used undelete app ever. But the screenshot might be some kind of thumbnail auto generated, just like from video (by vlc etc). But what purpose would it serve, sure to question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope. Those are not thumbnails for videos. Some are screenshots of me using messenger, some are screenshots on my gallery, some are just me plain browsing the internet.
These are not screenshots, they're thumbnails of apps that you see in the recents screen.
franz said:
These are not screenshots, they're thumbnails of apps that you see in the recents screen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^That is the correct answer. Everytime you click on home button or recent button, a screenshot will be taken to create what you see in recents screen, unless you want your recents screen to be blank. Those screenshots arent uploaded to anywhere and is immediately deleted after u go back into the app or clear apps from recents.
Thank you Franz and MM.626
You really answered this (and gave me peace of mind too haha)
Cheers!
This thread can be closed now.