Hey Guys,
I got my Note about 2 weeks ago and have noticed that the camera and pictures are unusually grainy/noisy and the auto focus is subpar which results in blurry pictures. I have messed with the ISO settings changing it to 100 and 200.. which seems to help some, but its still noticeable as well as the settings dont save. I have tried 3rd party apps as well, still the problem persists. I've also compared my camera and photos to a buddy's Sprint Note 2 and his are far superior. My next step is to go to Verizon, but i just wanted to see if anyone else was having issues. I have heard that it could probably be the Drivers and that it might be fixed with an update, hopefully so, because of now, im highly disappointed.
any input or advice is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Josh
That doesn't sound right, I get great pics from mine.
Obviously they are not as good as my EOS 1D Canon DSLR but they are amazing for a camera phone IMHO.
Here is a shot I took in a very dimly lit room where I wasn't even sure the pics would come out:
http://s361.beta.photobucket.com/user/jmorton10_photo/media/Camera-ZOOM_zpsbafd9ff2.jpg.html
I took over 100 shots and they all came out great. I printed an 8"x10" pic from this and nobody can believe it's from my phone.
I have used Camera ZoomFX or Camera FV-5 (to save RAW images) in my last 3-4 phones.
it's definitely not right.
to get even a decent picture, i have to manually set the ISO to 100 or 200, then focus (because the auto focus is terrible as well) and then if i move even the slightest, the picture comes out blurry.
Moose1988 said:
it's definitely not right.
to get even a decent picture, i have to manually set the ISO to 100 or 200, then focus (because the auto focus is terrible as well) and then if i move even the slightest, the picture comes out blurry.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have anti shake on?
Like most phones I find pics pretty bad if im not in bright light...or using flash..
And manually setting the iso at 100 in dark conditions is obviously gonna blur..youre better off using the flash and turning the exposure down a bit
bendystrawboy said:
You have anti shake on?
Like most phones I find pics pretty bad if im not in bright light...or using flash..
And manually setting the iso at 100 in dark conditions is obviously gonna blur..youre better off using the flash and turning the exposure down a bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well when setting the ISO to lower levels, Anti Shake is greyed out.
and everything in low light is gonna blur, yeah.. but im talking about all the time. regardless of light. I can get somewhat better pictures when I adjust the settings, but, that is somewhat time consuming when wanting to take a quick picture, especially since it doesnt save the settings I choose.
I am having the same problem. No solution yet.
Is your camera lense dirty? Wipe it with a microfiber cloth or something.
I'm having problems with blurry pictures as well. Seems like the camera is not "fast" enough trying to capture kids who move around while you're trying to take a picture. I've got it set to single shot, highest resolution, auto iso and auto exposure and still get some noisy pics and blurry faces. Not sure what it is....
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
gime_time said:
I am having the same problem. No solution yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe an update will help. Here's to hoping
nnnnr14 said:
Is your camera lense dirty? Wipe it with a microfiber cloth or something.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I make sure its clean everytime. I thought that might be it but no. Its more of a grain.. like its the software or a driver issue
1dirtypanda said:
I'm having problems with blurry pictures as well. Seems like the camera is not "fast" enough trying to capture kids who move around while you're trying to take a picture. I've got it set to single shot, highest resolution, auto iso and auto exposure and still get some noisy pics and blurry faces. Not sure what it is....
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah exactly. I have the same exact issues.
Could it be a Verizon Note issue?
I just did some testing, seems anti shake adds an enormous amount of noise to images, as does auto contrast.
AOSP Camera (Camera JB+, stock settings, no flash)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Touchwiz Camera: AS On
Touchwiz camera: AS off
edit: links should be right now
tdrussell said:
I just did some testing, seems anti shake adds an enormous amount of noise to images, as does auto contrast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never use either of those settings, but I'm definitely surprised that as ruins the image like that.
---------- Post added at 07:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:24 PM ----------
1dirtypanda said:
I'm having problems with blurry pictures as well. Seems like the camera is not "fast" enough trying to capture kids who move around while you're trying to take a picture.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, no big surprise there.
Some real digital cameras are going to have that problem..
I don't think its the anti shake as I have mine turned off. I have my flash set to off but maybe because the room I'm in isn't bright enough so it's pumping up the iso to capture the shot and thus its grainier..
But I've still notice that it's hard to get a good picture of moving subjects like kids oe dogs as it doesn't seem to focus on the right place or the focus point moves to easily.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
1dirtypanda said:
But I've still notice that it's hard to get a good picture of moving subjects like kids oe dogs as it doesn't seem to focus on the right place or the focus point moves to easily.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These are some of the main reasons people buy DSLRs. NO little dc is going to be fast enough for any kind of action shots.
I have done pro photography for years. When I want to take any kind of action (especially in lower light like you typically find inside your house), I grab my DSLR with a fast lens. That camera will shoot 8 frames per second, all in perfect focus, stops all action and will do it easily in lower light conditions.
The camera phone however works great if you give it half a chance. If you are taking a posed shot (like the one I posted where the girls were not moving) and have enough light (use the flash if necessary) then the phone and its tiny little lens and sensor will give very decent results.
I have been playing with the camera a ton in the last couple days using this app:
http://www.camerafv5.com/
The more I practice with it, the more impressed I am with this device.
If you understand basic photography, FV-5 gives you tons of ways to very quickly/easily make a fast settings change with one fast click to change things like the auto focus point, white balance setting etc to give really outstanding results within the limitations of the actual hardware.
Posters talk about an update like that will magically cure why they can't take a decent picture. No update is going to fix blurry pics when the cause of that is user error (and reading some of these posts it is obvious to me that is the case).
Posters are expecting results that are way beyond the capabilities of a device that is a phone first and also happens to also take snapshots. Expecting it to capture perfectly focused, sharp images of your kid or dog running around the yard is ridiculous. That is the job of a DSLR, even some of the better dedicated DCs will struggle with those kind of shots.
There are two basic settings that apply to any picture taken, F stop (how much light the lens lets in) and shutter speed (how long the shutter stays open while snapping the picture). Both these settings are adjustable on the better quality digital cameras. The faster the shutter speed, the better it is for stopping action. If you shoot at say 1/1000 of a second, you can shoot a clear pic of a race car. On the other hand, 1/15 of a second is so slow that even a slight twitch on the photographers part will result in a blurry image.
With the phone cameras, you don't have the luxury of altering these settings much (if there is any adjustment at all). With the tiny lens of the N2 (or ANY camera phone) you cannot alter the F stop setting at all, it is what's called a fixed aperature and is not adjustable. That only leaves the shutter speed to change to get the correct exposure for any particular shot.
Using Camera FV-5, you can get a small amount of manual control to make that shutter speed faster (better to stop movement) but it doesn't help all that much because if you pick a really fast/short shutter speed the image will usually come out way too dark as it is not letting in enough light to properly expose the image. With a good quality DC, you would open up the F stop more to compensate for this, but you can't do that with the fixed aperature phone camera lens (which is so tiny it doesn't let in much light to begin with)
Camera FV-5 gives you more control than the stock camera app which gives you no control al all, but the tiny lens/sensor etc can only do just so much. I have simplified a lot of this info to make it easier to understand, but the same basic principles apply to any camera all the way back to film cameras.
To take better pics with the N2, try to...
1: hold the camera as still as possible, brace it against something to help with this if possible
2: provide as much light as possible. Either add more ambient light or use the flash (or both)
3: don't expect results that equal a good quality digital camera, the N2 works great for basically posed snapshots etc. If you're trying to shhot your kids Varsity Basketball league or your 2 year old chasing the dog around the back yard get yourself a basic DSLR.
Well for me... I do know how to use a camera.. I've set all the settings, I know basic photography. I know its a phone camera, but my thunderbolt took better pictures than this. To me it seems like a phone issue... NOT a user issue. Thanks for the lesson though. Appreciate it. :good:
Moose1988 said:
Well for me... I do know how to use a camera.. I've set all the settings, I know basic photography. I know its a phone camera, but my thunderbolt took better pictures than this. To me it seems like a phone issue... NOT a user issue. Thanks for the lesson though. Appreciate it. :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So maybe it is a phone issue, maybe yours has defective hardware??
I'm hoping so. It really seems more grainy than it should be. I still need to go to Verizon and check another Note 2.
jmorton10 said:
I never use either of those settings, but I'm definitely surprised that as ruins the image like that.
---------- Post added at 07:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:24 PM ----------
LOL, no big surprise there.
Some real digital cameras are going to have that problem..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not talking about kids running around but rather them sitting still long a full 2-3s so I can snap a good picture without them moving their head. I don't have problems with my gnex camera at all in the same location. I seem to be having similar focus or grainy images that the op is seeing.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
The problem is that your last phone was an htc. Im coming from a Rezound and that camera was way better than this one. Never really even mess with the settings on the Rezound and the pictures always came out crisp and detailed.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
ripster said:
The problem is that your last phone was an htc. Im coming from a Rezound and that camera was way better than this one. Never really even mess with the settings on the Rezound and the pictures always came out crisp and detailed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not trying to be argumentative here at all, but I don't agree with this.
I still have two Rezounds and I rarely used the cameras because even though I kept reading how awesome the Rezound camera was I was never overly impressed with mine. I recently compared identical shots from one of the Rezounds with my N2. I left both on full auto so it was a fair comparison.
All the shots from the N2 came out perfect while the shots from the Rezound varied considerably. Some of the Rezound shots where too dark and others missed the focus point.
I really think some of you guys may have defective N2s and should go back to verizon and compare yours to another unit to compare results. My N2 is the first phone camera that works so well for me that I don't feel the need to carry an extra small P&S camera with me along with the phone.
I took over 100 shots of a Christmas party for my 12 year old daughters soccer team. I sent them to all the parents of the girls and they are thrilled with the shots. I took them inside where the light was not that great and most other phone cameras would have produced disastrous results. The shots are all perfectly exposed and it only missed the AF point on a couple shots.
The parents have all seen me shooting with my Canon EOS 1D DSLR over the years and naturally assumed that was what I was using to take the shots. When I told them the shots all came from my phone they where astounded. I printed a few 8"x10" shots for some of the parents and they can't believe it was possible to get a shot of that quality from a phone.
One of them told me yesterday they had framed the shot and hung it in their family room. Now, granted I have been doing photography professionally for years and I will always take better pictures in most situations without even thinking about it but I don't think that's the case here. I had my wife take some shots with the note to make sure that it wasn't just me. Her results where not as good as mine, but they where just fine as far as the camera performance.
Related
When I take pictures it looks real fuzzy..
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app
Try cleaning the lens. Jk, my camera takes great photos.
you have to press somewhere on the screen to have it focus first..then take the pic
i know its a pain, but i noticed the same thing
busties said:
When I take pictures it looks real fuzzy..
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine seems to be ok! But the thing is I don't have high standards for my phone camera. As I don't use it much sadly! I hope you get an easy fix for it!
I am having the same issue. I can very rarely get barcode scanning apps to work.
Here is a picture from my gs3, I reset the settings on the default camera app.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
And here is from my GS2, default camera app, default settings.
The GS3 is much more blurry.
Maybe you have a bad sensor? Or your lens could be dirty. Fog underneath it? Go to where you bought it and complain to get a new one and see what they do. Mine is perfect, for a phone anyway.
Just for kicks is a picture from instagram
Does anyone have Sprint and have GD camera?
d_bot said:
I am having the same issue. I can very rarely get barcode scanning apps to work.
Here is a picture from my gs3, I reset the settings on the default camera app.
And here is from my GS2, default camera app, default settings.
The GS3 is much more blurry.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The gs3 is a bit more advanced camera , and along with that the user must be a bit more advanced, and I'm also having to hear this myself. With the pic you took for example, you should very used hdr mode and keep a very steady hand. What hdr is for is when you have a mixed lighting situation like the one in your pic(bright & dark, or a sunny day but in the shade) it will actually take two pics & blend them to get it right. Try googling galaxy s3 camera tips & you will have to read & study it a bit, but you will have much more user control. Once you've figured it out you will have to make adjustments for each pic according to the environment, but the pics will be of pretty high quality. I hope I've helped you some.
I have a Sprint 32gb S3 and my camera works great. One of the best smartphone cameras I've used so far. I do notice that on all my smart phones that I'll regularly have a finger print on my camera lens, so I always be default wipe off the lens before i use the camera. (i do really miss my dedicated camera button though)
androholic said:
The gs3 is a bit more advanced camera , and along with that the user must be a bit more advanced, and I'm also having to hear this myself. With the pic you took for example, you should very used hdr mode and keep a very steady hand. What hdr is for is when you have a mixed lighting situation like the one in your pic(bright & dark, or a sunny day but in the shade) it will actually take two pics & blend them to get it right. Try googling galaxy s3 camera tips & you will have to read & study it a bit, but you will have much more user control. Once you've figured it out you will have to make adjustments for each pic according to the environment, but the pics will be of pretty high quality. I hope I've helped you some.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks I'll have a look around.
I attached 3 images from a hike we did on Sunday. 1 HDR and 2 Single shot pictures.
I'll play around with the setting and see if I can get it dialed in. The main issue I have found is in low light, or in mixed light like you said, but even outdoors, some pictures are awesome, some are just like pictures from my first camera phone.
Thanks for your help.
d_bot said:
Thanks I'll have a look around.
I attached 3 images from a hike we did on Sunday. 1 HDR and 2 Single shot pictures.
I'll play around with the setting and see if I can get it dialed in. The main issue I have found is in low light, or in mixed light like you said, but even outdoors, some pictures are awesome, some are just like pictures from my first camera phone.
Thanks for your help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, the settings are a bit tricky but I'm learning how to use them slowly but surely. But wow, I wish I was on that hike, that is a beautiful scenery!
---------- Post added at 02:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:39 PM ----------
d_bot said:
Thanks I'll have a look around.
I attached 3 images from a hike we did on Sunday. 1 HDR and 2 Single shot pictures.
I'll play around with the setting and see if I can get it dialed in. The main issue I have found is in low light, or in mixed light like you said, but even outdoors, some pictures are awesome, some are just like pictures from my first camera phone.
Thanks for your help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've also discovered that for myself, when taking a picture of an object or person less than maybe 3 feet away(give or take) I use macro mode & manually focus to get a nice shot with pretty distinctive details. I especially find them nice when I edit them with the Samsung photo editor app & turn them into Grey scale.
androholic said:
Yes, the settings are a bit tricky but I'm learning how to use them slowly but surely. But wow, I wish I was on that hike, that is a beautiful scenery!
---------- Post added at 02:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:39 PM ----------
I've also discovered that for myself, when taking a picture of an object or person less than maybe 3 feet away(give or take) I use macro mode & manually focus to get a nice shot with pretty distinctive details. I especially find them nice when I edit them with the Samsung photo editor app & turn them into Grey scale.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah I ended up cleaning the lens real good, played with some settings. It's much better...I think LOL, thanks for your help.
yeah it was an awesome hike. Its called donut falls in utah. Im sure there are videos and pictures if you look around.
I know a lot of folks with the international phones had some of the same issues with the camera. Not sure if its related or not.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1724124
blackhemi4x4 said:
I know a lot of folks with the international phones had some of the same issues with the camera. Not sure if its related or not.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1724124
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I've been lurking there. I can't get my camera to take decent pictures. Especially like has been mentioned, in low light. The gs2 camera is insanely better. Compared to the gs2 and the iphone4s my gs3 is like my first camera phone. LOL I hope it's just a software thing...and not a hardware.
I notice some noise every now and then, usually only in low light settings. For the most part my S3 takes amazing pictures. This is easily the best camera I have ever seen on a smartphone. Night and day difference compared to my S2.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
Yeah I think there is for sure something wrong with the camera.
The attached pics should be much better than that.......
My pictures do not look like that. It looks like there is more noise in the S2 shot but less blur so perhaps the S3 defaults to a lower iso setting and slower shutter speed hence more blur. Check your iso settings. There's also an antishake option, Im not 100% sure but I'm pretty sure it bumps up the iso to 1600 (normal max is iso 800) and limits the shutter speed to no slower than 1/30 (with anti-shake off it's 1/15)
busties said:
When I take pictures it looks real fuzzy..
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Low light is fuzzy
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
from what I have noticed, pictures up close seem fine.....anything further than like 3 feet or so......total blur. It's almost like the camera is stuck in the "up close" mode, or like it won't re-focus.
So I was trying to take a picture of my son sleeping on my wife's lap tonight. There was a light on in the bedroom, but it was too dark to take a picture without the flash. I opened the camera app and without adjusting any settings, tried to take several pictures. The flash was set to AUTO and it did activate each time I clicked the shutter button, however the actual picture would not be taken until the flash had already gone off. I tried 4 images with the flash set to AUTO and 4 images with the flash set to ON. Only 3 of the 8 images were actually captured while the flash was still visible. So there is an obvious issue with the timing of the flash and the shutter not being synchronized.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
In addition, the image quality is really bad. The pictures all seem to have been run through some sort of photoshop filter that makes the image look like a watercolor or something.
All 8 images can be viewed here: http://imgur.com/a/lDIrg
911jason said:
So I was trying to take a picture of my son sleeping on my wife's lap tonight. There was a light on in the bedroom, but it was too dark to take a picture without the flash. I opened the camera app and without adjusting any settings, tried to take several pictures. The flash was set to AUTO and it did activate each time I clicked the shutter button, however the actual picture would not be taken until the flash had already gone off. I tried 4 images with the flash set to AUTO and 4 images with the flash set to ON. Only 3 of the 8 images were actually captured while the flash was still visible. So there is an obvious issue with the timing of the flash and the shutter not being synchronized.
In addition, the image quality is really bad. The pictures all seem to have been run through some sort of photoshop filter that makes the image look like a watercolor or something.
All 8 images can be viewed here: http://imgur.com/a/lDIrg
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Turn off continuous shooting. I had the same problem.
I wasn't shooting multiple shots at the time, but I will give that a try. Thanks!
Flash only work at first shoot
Sent from my HTC One X+ using xda app-developers app
I wasn't using continuous mode at the time, just taking single pictures. I will try disabling the continuous mode option though.
Any one have a comment on why the image quality is so bad though?
I got the same problem, looks like some sort of filter is added to the pics.
Doesnt have that problem, all works fine except the quality at low light ...
But the camera do his job perfect most times
this will look like perfectly working vs the CM10 camera right now
Notechis said:
Doesnt have that problem, all works fine except the quality at low light ...
But the camera do his job perfect most times
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't had the flash sync problem anymore either. A simple reboot seems to have fixed that. Are you seeing any quality issues though?
Lloir said:
this will look like perfectly working vs the CM10 camera right now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha ha... I bet. CM doesn't use the HTC image processor... Is the CM camera really bad right now though?
911jason said:
I haven't had the flash sync problem anymore either. A simple reboot seems to have fixed that. Are you seeing any quality issues though?
Ha ha... I bet. CM doesn't use the HTC image processor... Is the CM camera really bad right now though?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
honestly it doesnt look "too" bad but it does make the world look a bit lopsided
No the quality and the sync is fine, but at low light, the quality is ok but not not perfect.
But that problem is quite normal for small chips and ISO
Will post some links, if I have 10 Threads, otherwise I am not allowed
Here you see the differences
Same Watercolor issue
I have been trying to get a good picture out of this camera and I keep reading reviews where people say it rivals the iPhone, which is ridiculous. The photos look smeared and filtered. I cleaned my lens, tried every setting in every configuration and it still looks horrible. This is an example of a 100% zoom. All pictures take on this quality its super annoying.
Edit: These images were not taken with digital zoom. All images were cropped at 100% to show quality of the pictures.
My front facing camera seems to be fine though... so wtf?
Luckyfinch said:
I have been trying to get a good picture out of this camera and I keep reading reviews where people say it rivals the iPhone, which is ridiculous. The photos look smeared and filtered. I cleaned my lens, tried every setting in every configuration and it still looks horrible. This is an example of a 100% zoom. All pictures take on this quality its super annoying.
My front facing camera seems to be fine though... so wtf?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Digital zoom is never the best tbh
No digital zoom
WigglesGRN said:
Digital zoom is never the best tbh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those images were not taken with digital zoom. They are just cropped at 100% to show the quality of the images.
Yep, that's how my pictures look too. If I can't figure this out in the next week, I'm going to have to return my X+. Not sure if I'll try another one or just switch to another device.
Pretty sure you're looking at what would have been an really grainy picture, and HTC knows everyone hates grainy pictures. So HTC tried to dial in what they thought would be an aesthetically pleasing image filter that summarizes colors and sort of substitutes "grainy" with "splotchy". I only really see it on lowlight pictures and if I zoom in real close.
I have a lot of reference pics of this one corner where the sidewalk meets the road outside my office where I go to smoke. I used to be a flashaholic on my HTC Inspire (AKA America's Desire HD), and I would compare camera shots of this one corner to see how the camera software on different ROMs handled it. during the day I can get direct sunlight and shade, so I have a ton of reference material. I can say with the "watercolor effect" you're really not missing out on much. It really is just "watercolor" instead of "grainy".
I think compression has a lot to do with it too. I think HTC probably has JPEG compression dialed in higher than we normally would, and the watercolor masks artifacts as well.
All that nay-saying aside, It does murder HDR shots. I'm looking forward to a time when either HTC hands us more ability to tweek settings and/or releases enough source for devs to manipulate the image chip. Sometimes I just want to save what the sensor sees.
Ok I think I've rambled enough.
iggdawg said:
Pretty sure you're looking at what would have been an really grainy picture, and HTC knows everyone hates grainy pictures. So HTC tried to dial in what they thought would be an aesthetically pleasing image filter that summarizes colors and sort of substitutes "grainy" with "splotchy". I only really see it on lowlight pictures and if I zoom in real close.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can easily see the effect in this picture taken at a distance of a foot or two with the flash on. Definitely far from low-light. You might have to zoom in a bit to see it, but not past 100%. My wife would kill me for posting this by the way! She's pregnant and not very happy with me taking any pics at all!
^Accidental like. Bumpy bus ride home from work.
The quality can always be improved with modding.
Sent from my HTC One X+ using xda premium
Huh?
scroll down to see my post with updated pics with the new tricks!!
so one thing i noticed is that the camera doesn't light up the flash to focus when you have the flash on like most other phones do (the S3 is one)
this makes low light shots 10x worse on the DNA than the S3 for example. If there was a way to make the camera flash while focusing so it can actually get that thing in focus in the dark, then i believe low light pictures would come out much better.
i've tried Camera JB+ but it's the same as the stock...wonder if theres a cmaera app out there that uses the flash while focusing? any thoughts?
here's two pics:
http://imgur.com/a/Bb5ju
the first is the S3. the second is the DNA. since when you focus with the S3, the flash comes on, it was easily able to focus and get a better shot. on the DNA, it was blindly focusing on whatever, despite the fact the screen was black since there was no light in the room.
you can also notice how soft the DNA seems...which is the post-processing "auto enhance" crap that HTC forced us to use on this camera. on my Rezound, i always turned that off because it looked awful, and now they're not giving us a chance to.
I'm very interested in the answer to this, as I think that low-light shots with flash are absolute garbage on the DNA. I love everything about the phone except for that. I think even my old Blunderbolt did better.
earthrocker said:
so one thing i noticed is that the camera doesn't light up the flash to focus when you have the flash on like most other phones do (the S3 is one)
this makes low light shots 10x worse on the DNA than the S3 for example. If there was a way to make the camera flash while focusing so it can actually get that thing in focus in the dark, then i believe low light pictures would come out much better.
i've tried Camera JB+ but it's the same as the stock...wonder if theres a cmaera app out there that uses the flash while focusing? any thoughts?
here's two pics:
http://imgur.com/a/Bb5ju
the first is the S3. the second is the DNA. since when you focus with the S3, the flash comes on, it was easily able to focus and get a better shot. on the DNA, it was blindly focusing on whatever, despite the fact the screen was black since there was no light in the room.
you can also notice how soft the DNA seems...which is the post-processing "auto enhance" crap that HTC forced us to use on this camera. on my Rezound, i always turned that off because it looked awful, and now they're not giving us a chance to.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
odesskiy said:
I'm very interested in the answer to this, as I think that low-light shots with flash are absolute garbage on the DNA. I love everything about the phone except for that. I think even my old Blunderbolt did better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the big problem here is Auto ISO. do me a favor, turn the ISO to 200, and then try to take a low-light photo with flash. It may be very hard to focus on exactly where you want, but i guarantee there will be MUCH less noise. the ISO over-compensates, and at auto, its very grainy. i took pitch black shots last night at iso 200 and 400 with flash on, and to my surprise there wasn't much noise.
also, turn your sharpness up +1. this helps compensate for HTC's built in auto-enhance, which tends to "blur" the background out to try to get rid of noise..the rezound had this too, and i always had it off because it looks terrible. unfortunately, on the DNA, you can't turn it off yet.
I know it's not the solution you were looking for, but on my Rezound if I were taking very low light shots I'd turn on my flashlight app first, so the flash would be on permanently. The phone would then both focus with and take the photo with the flash on.
Until such time as a solution is found, feel free to try my hassle of a work-around haha
xxfallacyxx said:
I know it's not the solution you were looking for, but on my Rezound if I were taking very low light shots I'd turn on my flashlight app first, so the flash would be on permanently. The phone would then both focus with and take the photo with the flash on.
Until such time as a solution is found, feel free to try my hassle of a work-around haha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey thanks for the tip! what app did you use to do it? that would be great, but unfortunately, the flashlight shuts off the second i enter the camera app :\
It might just be part of the ROM I'm on, but I use the flashlight toggle from the quick-settings pull down menu. If that's the case, then I apologize for getting your hopes up haha.
ahh dang! yeah, tiny flashlihgt doesn't let me keep it on when going into the camera app
earthrocker said:
the big problem here is Auto ISO. do me a favor, turn the ISO to 200, and then try to take a low-light photo with flash. It may be very hard to focus on exactly where you want, but i guarantee there will be MUCH less noise. the ISO over-compensates, and at auto, its very grainy. i took pitch black shots last night at iso 200 and 400 with flash on, and to my surprise there wasn't much noise.
also, turn your sharpness up +1. this helps compensate for HTC's built in auto-enhance, which tends to "blur" the background out to try to get rid of noise..the rezound had this too, and i always had it off because it looks terrible. unfortunately, on the DNA, you can't turn it off yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and change white balance to flourescent, this will make photo not yellowish.
Sweet! I'm gonna try this tonight at home. I've been trying to take pictures of my Xmas tree, which is really beautiful and photos were coming out horrid. Too bad you can't save all these settings to some sort of a preset to be enabled quickly for low-light shots
guys, I've figured out the secret to low light shots! the pic I took looks identical to the gs3 now, from what I can tell on my dna. check it out!
set your iso to 200...always use 200 for least noise possible. put sharpness up + 1. then, the secret here, jack exposure up ALL THE WAY! bam! great night shots with flash that even focus decently too. your screen will be black bevsuseThe iso is so low, but take the pic and you'll see!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC Droid DNA using Tapatalk 2
Holy crap! That totally worked! Much, much better results! Now we need some sort of a settings switcher for the camera
Check the contrast
Hey all, this is my first post and I know that I'm a noob - glad I got that out of the way.
As I read these posts and looked at the settings on my DNA, I found that by defult HTC sets their contrast WAY too high - it actually makes the pictures look darker. So I suggest that you play around with the contrast. I lowered it all the way down and my scenes look brighter and cleaner.
Yes, ISO 200 and 400 work best. Also, if you want to make your images looks 'artsy,' the camera app has built in filters.
Well, that's all I have for you all.
Later.
xeroatticus said:
Hey all, this is my first post and I know that I'm a noob - glad I got that out of the way.
As I read these posts and looked at the settings on my DNA, I found that by defult HTC sets their contrast WAY too high - it actually makes the pictures look darker. So I suggest that you play around with the contrast. I lowered it all the way down and my scenes look brighter and cleaner.
Yes, ISO 200 and 400 work best. Also, if you want to make your images looks 'artsy,' the camera app has built in filters.
Well, that's all I have for you all.
Later.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey, thanks for the contribution! i'm going to give the contrast a shot now. i never really played that much around with that, just ISO and exposure. thanks!
ok so here's a small contrast comparison:
the first picture is contrast -1
the second picture is stock contrast
which looks better to you?
http://imgur.com/a/Jjplk
earthrocker said:
ok so here's a small contrast comparison:
the first picture is contrast -1
the second picture is stock contrast
which looks better to you?
http://imgur.com/a/Jjplk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tonight i'm going to try some night shots again, wtih the same liquor cabinet pic, but make the contrast -1 and -2 and throw them up here.
Great thread and info guys. Always looking to make phone camera pics the best possible...
Some of my own tests
Hey, I like the first image: the one that has stock contrast.
I will also be making some tests, I will post them soon.
HDR is also a great option under well lit conditions. It will give the the greatest range.
xeroatticus said:
Hey, I like the first image: the one that has stock contrast.
I will also be making some tests, I will post them soon.
HDR is also a great option under well lit conditions. It will give the the greatest range.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
to be honest, i never really knew what HDR meant or did lol sometimes it looks great, soemtimes terrible
xeroatticus said:
Hey, I like the first image: the one that has stock contrast.
I will also be making some tests, I will post them soon.
HDR is also a great option under well lit conditions. It will give the the greatest range.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
btw the first pic is the -1 contrast..second is stock..
Very interesting thread!
Methodolgy
6P: shot with Google camera with auto HDR and SOOC.
6D: shot with a Sigma 24-35 F/2 Art on aperture priority at F/2 everything else on Auto and RAW
Lumia 1020: Shot with Lumia camera and windows phone 10 on RAW+JPG
RAWs edited in lightroom to taste but not to perfection. Mild noise reduction, I prefer a bit of noise/detail over loss of detail but less noise.
sidenote: I attempted to shoot RAW using Manual Camera but the program is still buggy as it decided it didn't want to save the pictures and it sometimes force closes. I was annoyed when I got back and there was nothing there but the google camera photos. Camera FV5 does not work at all, it chooses some random settings and sticks with it and it is unable to physically take a picture.
Photos here:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0Bykn_7SF2z7JblZxbnl2VDBWa2M&usp=sharing
staticx57 said:
Methodolgy
6P: shot with Google camera with auto HDR and SOOC.
6D: shot with a Sigma 24-35 F/2 Art on aperture priority at F/2 everything else on Auto and RAW
Lumia 1020: Shot with Lumia camera and windows phone 10 on RAW+JPG
RAWs edited in lightroom to taste but not to perfection. Mild noise reduction, I prefer a bit of noise/detail over loss of detail but less noise.
sidenote: I attempted to shoot RAW using Manual Camera but the program is still buggy as it decided it didn't want to save the pictures and it sometimes force closes. I was annoyed when I got back and there was nothing there but the google camera photos. Camera FV5 does not work at all, it chooses some random settings and sticks with it and it is unable to physically take a picture.
Photos here:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0Bykn_7SF2z7JblZxbnl2VDBWa2M&usp=sharing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cool photos. I think all the pics are great. the 6D is the best and the 6p is the least good but man is it good for a phone in my opinion.
well I had to edit b/c the 6p does seem to have a faster shutter on some of the photos than the Lumia but that Lumia has some nice contrast.
Nice photos. Not sure why 1020 photos are really saturated artificially. I like how 6D takes photos in detail yet soft around the edges making ease in the eye.
staticx57 said:
Methodolgy
6P: shot with Google camera with auto HDR and SOOC.
6D: shot with a Sigma 24-35 F/2 Art on aperture priority at F/2 everything else on Auto and RAW
Lumia 1020: Shot with Lumia camera and windows phone 10 on RAW+JPG
RAWs edited in lightroom to taste but not to perfection. Mild noise reduction, I prefer a bit of noise/detail over loss of detail but less noise.
sidenote: I attempted to shoot RAW using Manual Camera but the program is still buggy as it decided it didn't want to save the pictures and it sometimes force closes. I was annoyed when I got back and there was nothing there but the google camera photos. Camera FV5 does not work at all, it chooses some random settings and sticks with it and it is unable to physically take a picture.
Photos here:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0Bykn_7SF2z7JblZxbnl2VDBWa2M&usp=sharing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just as a heads up, Manual Camera is saving RAW files for me. However, it appears Google Photos and some other gallery apps aren't picking up the file. Manual Camera seems finicky on picking it up in the built-in gallery too. However, I navigated to the folder via ES File Explorer and there was a .dng file present, and if you share the photo to an app such as Snapseed (which recently added RAW support), you can pull up and edit the photo. I'm going to start looking for a new gallery app that recognizes the .dng format and go from there. Kinda funny that Google lets the new Nexus devices shoot in RAW but Google Photos doesn't recognize the format.
@staticx57 Love comparisons like these. Thanks for posting it up. Here's to hoping FV5 or other camera apps get to working in marshmallow somewhat soon.
Any chance for the unedited photos from the D5 and 1020?
outofluck said:
Just as a heads up, Manual Camera is saving RAW files for me. However, it appears Google Photos and some other gallery apps aren't picking up the file. Manual Camera seems finicky on picking it up in the built-in gallery too. However, I navigated to the folder via ES File Explorer and there was a .dng file present, and if you share the photo to an app such as Snapseed (which recently added RAW support), you can pull up and edit the photo. I'm going to start looking for a new gallery app that recognizes the .dng format and go from there. Kinda funny that Google lets the new Nexus devices shoot in RAW but Google Photos doesn't recognize the format.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Later when I got back and noticed the lack of DNG files I realized it saved nothing. To be clear the program wasn't working right, I had no jpegs or raws. Later I also shot a few test shots of my keyboard and to my surprise it did save the files, but it promptly forced closed after as it did many times before, but this time it saved. I am going to chalk this up to teething problems and fully expect the 6P to take much better or at least better editable photos as things mature.
Elnrik said:
@staticx57 Love comparisons like these. Thanks for posting it up. Here's to hoping FV5 or other camera apps get to working in marshmallow somewhat soon.
Any chance for the unedited photos from the D5 and 1020?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll edit the album and add the SOOC jpegs from the 1020 and DSLR. To note though is the 1020 takes 5MP JPEG + 38 MP DNG(what I use) or 5 MP JPEG + 38 JPEG so they will be slightly different.
staticx57 said:
I'll edit the album and add the SOOC jpegs from the 1020 and DSLR. To note though is the 1020 takes 5MP JPEG + 38 MP DNG or 5 MP JPEG + 38 JPEG so they will be slightly different.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No rush, and no worries. You've done us a huge favor already by putting those up. Seriously, thanks a ton! My goal with that was to get a rough idea on how much post processing the google camera is doing to these photos. Is the camera just average and there is stellar post processing going on, or... you know, that kind of stuff.
Much thanks!
Elnrik said:
No rush, and no worries. You've done us a huge favor already by putting those up. Seriously, thanks a ton! My goal with that was to get a rough idea on how much post processing the google camera is doing to these photos. Is the camera just average and there is stellar post processing going on, or... you know, that kind of stuff.
Much thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Too late, already added.
My opinion here is the jpegs here produced by all three devices are similar but the ability to reliably shoot RAW is where the magic happens.
I really want to do a part two and three with some low light and some bright sunny day but I may hold off until things mature a bit on the 6P. Ill shoot a few night scenes when I get a chance to hold us over though. And ill see if Manual Camera decides to work with me. I already sent an email to the devs of FV5 so maybe that will get sorted.
staticx57 said:
Too late, already added.
My opinion here is the jpegs here produced by all three devices are similar but the ability to reliably shoot RAW is where the magic happens.
I really want to do a part two and three with some low light and some bright sunny day but I may hold off until things mature a bit on the 6P. Ill shoot a few night scenes when I get a chance to hold us over though. And ill see if Manual Camera decides to work with me. I already sent an email to the devs of FV5 so maybe that will get sorted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SUBSCRIBED! hehehe :good:
---------- Post added at 12:43 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:09 AM ----------
Wow, the 6D shrub SOOC vs LR photo... Good stuff. The color that the raw held on to in the shaded areas is great. I need to suck it up and pull the trigger on that D610 I've been eyeballing for a while. Now to find creative financing options... hehe.
Elnrik said:
SUBSCRIBED! hehehe :good:
---------- Post added at 12:43 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:09 AM ----------
Wow, the 6D shrub SOOC vs LR photo... Good stuff. The color that the raw held on to in the shaded areas is great. I need to suck it up and pull the trigger on that D610 I've been eyeballing for a while. Now to find creative financing options... hehe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly the D610 is a fantastic camera. The sony sensors Nikon uses in the DSLRs at least half a generation if not a full generation ahead of what Canon has so that 610 will outperform my 6D easily.
If you are interested:
http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Comp...on-D610-versus-Nokia-Lumia-1020___836_915_933
Thank you for that.
I inherited some Nikon AF lenses along with a broken body... I think it was a D700? Would be crazy of me to get a Canon and let the lenses go to waste. A friend of mine recommended the 610. If he says it's good, I won't argue. He does that stuff for a living. I just want to take pictures of mountains and my dog. I'm getting sick of the poor results with cheap point and shoots and smartphones.
For example, this pic would be so much better if it weren't taken by my old crappy smartphone of the time.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Elnrik said:
Thank you for that.
I inherited some Nikon AF lenses along with a broken body... I think it was a D700? Would be crazy of me to get a Canon and let the lenses go to waste. A friend of mine recommended the 610. If he says it's good, I won't argue. He does that stuff for a living. I just want to take pictures of mountains and my dog. I'm getting sick of the poor results with cheap point and shoots and smartphones.
For example, this pic would be so much better if it weren't taken by my old crappy smartphone of the time.
View attachment 3525573
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds like you have the makings of a very nice start then. I shoot Canon since it is what I started with many many years ago, and it gets expensive to switch. It would be hard to justify unless you had a professional reason to do so and I do not. But you cannot go wrong with either. Your friend made a very very good recommendation. I did a little searching on the D610 and it is a very nice camera to start with. It might be a tad more difficult to use at first over a pure beginner camera such as the d3200 my best friend has, but even with 10 minutes with the d3200 I felt limited by its features. You would not have this limitation with the D610.
What you took isn't a bad picture at all! Would a DSLR or mirrorless camera make a cleaner image? Of course but you also have to consider the size of the thing. We will carry our 6Ps everywhere and in a month or two when everything starts to settle it will hit its stride and easily take pictures (although at a lower resolution) as good as the 1020. I still consider the 1020 to be the gold standard in terms of picture quality although not speed where the initial shot takes 10 seconds and shot to shot time is around 4 seconds.
Now like others have said if only these 3rd party camera apps can unlock the full potential with RAW this could get pretty exciting. Combine that with the tweaks that you know Google will push out sooner rather than later and can't wait to see this camera at full power!
Hello all
I am observing something that angers me a bit and I see as kind of an issue with the camera and the processing my S23 Ultra does to each shot, more specifically to those taken in 50 and 200mp modes.
I have noticed a considerable oversaturation, increase in warmer tones and maybe even adding of contrast. Whenever there is a scenario where I have oranges or reds, the phone adds more to those and they blow up. I noticed it the other day while shooting a sunset.
The attached pictures are from the standard app, but the same happens in Pro and Expert RAW. The 1st pic is at 12 mp. There is some saturation added, but not too much. The 2nd one is from the 50mp where it goes crazy. After I take the shot it looks good, but it shows that it is processing it and than - crap happens. Same is with the 200 mode.
I spoke with a Samsung rep, I have reset the camera settings, restarted the phone and I am on the newest version, having updated a few hours ago.
Do you see the same behaviour with your S23 Ultras or is it just me? And is there something I can do? I have disabled and disabled the Picture color mode in Dev Options with no effect.
Thank you a lot in advance for helping out!
Korowin said:
Hello all
I am observing something that angers me a bit and I see as kind of an issue with the camera and the processing my S23 Ultra does to each shot, more specifically to those taken in 50 and 200mp modes.
I have noticed a considerable oversaturation, increase in warmer tones and maybe even adding of contrast. Whenever there is a scenario where I have oranges or reds, the phone adds more to those and they blow up. I noticed it the other day while shooting a sunset.
The attached pictures are from the standard app, but the same happens in Pro and Expert RAW. The 1st pic is at 12 mp. There is some saturation added, but not too much. The 2nd one is from the 50mp where it goes crazy. After I take the shot it looks good, but it shows that it is processing it and than - crap happens. Same is with the 200 mode.
I spoke with a Samsung rep, I have reset the camera settings, restarted the phone and I am on the newest version, having updated a few hours ago.
Do you see the same behaviour with your S23 Ultras or is it just me? And is there something I can do? I have disabled and disabled the Picture color mode in Dev Options with no effect.
Thank you a lot in advance for helping out!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try to disable "scene optimizer". It could be the issue.
Klaudas said:
Try to disable "scene optimizer". It could be the issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That should certainly be done but it does not help a ton. The most significant thing I have found is to always shoot in pro mode and take saturation down 2-3 clicks, click the right most icon on the top of the screen to get access to that setting. As mentioned in the gcam thread I also take down shadows and highlights 2-3 clicks and turn contrast up 2-3 clicks. That tends to expand the dynamic range just enough to make a difference. Make sure to use the additional camera settings to tell the cam to always remember your last mode and filter settings.
And about the image in the OP - getting this type of scene right in "auto everything" mode is tough even for DSLR cameras costing thousands of dollars. You have to futz a bit with the white balance and exposure to get something pleasing on practically any camera. shooting into the sun requires good understanding of what the sensor is seeing, and almost always takes significant post processing to make it look natural
GroovyGeek said:
That should certainly be done but it does not help a ton. The most significant thing I have found is to always shoot in pro mode and take saturation down 2-3 clicks, click the right most icon on the top of the screen to get access to that setting. As mentioned in the gcam thread I also take down shadows and highlights 2-3 clicks and turn contrast up 2-3 clicks. That tends to expand the dynamic range just enough to make a difference. Make sure to use the additional camera settings to tell the cam to always remember your last mode and filter settings.
And about the image in the OP - getting this type of scene right in "auto everything" mode is tough even for DSLR cameras costing thousands of dollars. You have to futz a bit with the white balance and exposure to get something pleasing on practically any camera. shooting into the sun requires good understanding of what the sensor is seeing, and almost always takes significant post processing to make it look natural
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you both. Scene Optimizer didn't help at all and i will try that saturation thing, though it tells me it is not available for RAW mode
Still it is good to hear, that I am not the only one, so it is not a HW issue, but a software one. Right?
I am not expecting for the phone to replace my Nikon 6 II, but use it, when I am taking a walk and shoot something nice and not need to carry the camera and all the additional things with it
Stock app on s23u screen look ok. Because the screen is washed out with too much blue and green.
But when Ive edited the picture on my benq 4k screen 99% color accuracy, wow, indeed over saturated !
I will follow the Gcam thread closely, I think a member is very close to have a config file on point.
Itnis actually a really good point. I javent thought that i also have Vivid mode on the phone and things might look quite different on other devices.
I assume you also have the same issue as I do with the phone oversaturating shots?
Korowin said:
I assume you also have the same issue as I do with the phone oversaturating shots?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably report it with a photo/video evidence and detailed description in Samsung members application.
Klaudas said:
Probably report it with a photo/video evidence and detailed description in Samsung members application.
Already did. I aslo spoke with a rep from Samsun US, but I am not sure if he will log it
Does it mean though that you dont have such an issue with your phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe I have but I like colors on my photos
Well not when the Oranges in your shot are trying to get out of the screen and have a life of their own
Don't use Expert RAW, as best as I can tell it has fewer capabilities that PRO mode in the stock app. Once in pro mode click the icon in the top right of the screen (looks like two concentric circles connected by spokes). Then along the bottom there are a bunch of cryptic icons. When you click on each some verbiage will appear explaining what they are. First one is contrast, second highlights, third shadows, fourth saturation, fifth tint. Take down saturation, highlights and shadows 2-3 clicks and bring contrast up the same amount and see what you think.
Other settings to adjust in tandem: from the modes panel pull down Pro mode to the modes strip at the bottom; under Advanced Picture options change storage mode to either RAW or RAW+JPEG if you want to futz with things in Photoshop; and most importantly under Settings to Keep make sure that camera mode and filters are checked.
Korowin said:
Hello all
I am observing something that angers me a bit and I see as kind of an issue with the camera and the processing my S23 Ultra does to each shot, more specifically to those taken in 50 and 200mp modes.
I have noticed a considerable oversaturation, increase in warmer tones and maybe even adding of contrast. Whenever there is a scenario where I have oranges or reds, the phone adds more to those and they blow up. I noticed it the other day while shooting a sunset.
The attached pictures are from the standard app, but the same happens in Pro and Expert RAW. The 1st pic is at 12 mp. There is some saturation added, but not too much. The 2nd one is from the 50mp where it goes crazy. After I take the shot it looks good, but it shows that it is processing it and than - crap happens. Same is with the 200 mode.
I spoke with a Samsung rep, I have reset the camera settings, restarted the phone and I am on the newest version, having updated a few hours ago.
Do you see the same behavior with your S23 Ultras or is it just me? And is there something I can do? I have disabled and disabled the Picture color mode in Dev Options with no effect.
Thank you a lot in advance for helping out!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I don't have my S23 Ultra yet and don't know how you got yours so fast. I'm still waiting and I ordered mine on the 16th, day before they were to be released.
That said, all high end phones and my Nikon Camera have settings that affect that, for an example the "VIVID" setting in my Nikon would cause the saturation problem with your photos and can be adjusted.
Also mid to high end Samsung TVs have that too. In the showrooms they're all set to VIVID or something similar to make the picture POP. Samsung phones probably comes that way as well.
So read your manual and find settings for saturation and adjust to your liking.
Thank you, William. To add to it, I actually got mine the next day, the 2nd from my local Samsung store. I guess it depends per country, but we just got the upgrade from 256 to 512 as a benefit and nothing else.
I have taken some shots the past day, having turned off scene optimization and HDR and making sure that I am looking at the RAW shot, not the jpeg and it seems better.
Your Nikon camera, mine including, has a similar option, but it affects the jpeg shot only and not the RAW, where you can do whatever you like. I am kind of expecting the same with the phones RAW shots.
Still when looking at the jpeg, when I have set it up to take both, the jpeg seems worse, while the RAW is ok. I guess it will take some playing with it and it became better and I thank all that spared time to reply to me. The phone is just amazing. Even 3 weeks after I got it, I still can stop wondering how big of an upgrade it is for me and how much I like it
Cheers!
Korowin said:
Thank you, William. To add to it, I actually got mine the next day, the 2nd from my local Samsung store. I guess it depends per country, but we just got the upgrade from 256 to 512 as a benefit and nothing else.
I have taken some shots the past day, having turned off scene optimization and HDR and making sure that I am looking at the RAW shot, not the jpeg and it seems better.
Your Nikon camera, mine including, has a similar option, but it affects the jpeg shot only and not the RAW, where you can do whatever you like. I am kind of expecting the same with the phones RAW shots.
Still when looking at the jpeg, when I have set it up to take both, the jpeg seems worse, while the RAW is ok. I guess it will take some playing with it and it became better and I thank all that spared time to reply to me. The phone is just amazing. Even 3 weeks after I got it, I still can stop wondering how big of an upgrade it is for me and how much I like it
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got a great deal with my S23 Ultra:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I ordered this phone for the photography features as I was surprised how good my former S21+ was... I started leaving my Nikons home too much. LOL But these camera phones will never be able to shoot BIF that I like to do. Anyways I'm a semi-pro and here is my website if you care to look.
https://moskovita-photography.com/
william58 said:
I got a great deal with my S23 Ultra:
View attachment 5847523I ordered this phone for the photography features as I was surprised how good my former S21+ was... I started leaving my Nikons home too much. LOL But these camera phones will never be able to shoot BIF that I like to do. Anyways I'm a semi-pro and here is my website if you care to look.
https://moskovita-photography.com/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you have quite a lot of amazing shots there, mate. I urge you not to stop taking your Nikon with you . I know it can be quite a lot and when I decide to go full out, my backpack is close to 15 kilos, but oh, well. It is worth it when you take that amazing shot
The phone is quite impressive for a phone camera, but it is still not close to the real deal. The difference is sensor size does matter a lot.
Here are some of mine then too
Vasil Andreev Photography
Vasil Andreev Photography, София, България. 1,548 likes · 62 talking about this. Landscape, Wildlife and Macro Photography
www.facebook.com
Korowin said:
you have quite a lot of amazing shots there, mate. I urge you not to stop taking your Nikon with you . I know it can be quite a lot and when I decide to go full out, my backpack is close to 15 kilos, but oh, well. It is worth it when you take that amazing shot
The phone is quite impressive for a phone camera, but it is still not close to the real deal. The difference is sensor size does matter a lot.
Here are some of mine then too
Vasil Andreev Photography
Vasil Andreev Photography, София, България. 1,548 likes · 62 talking about this. Landscape, Wildlife and Macro Photography
www.facebook.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah... indeed you do have some great photos on FB.
Here is my older website with 40 years worth of photos
http://www.moskovita-photography.com/stock_photography.htm
william58 said:
Ah... indeed you do have some great photos on FB.
Here is my older website with 40 years worth of photos
http://www.moskovita-photography.com/stock_photography.htm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome. I am still browsing and I love it. I am still new. Got the Nikon a year ago, had no clue what is going on, and still pushing through it. It is quite a lot of fun, having in mind I hated taking pictures before.
And I kind of like it, that this phone gives me the opportunity to dig into how it is working and what it does to get even more out of it.
I found that using my note9 for photos they came out exactly as what I see with my eyes. The 23 ultra threw a bunch of blue into the sky and made things much more vibrant than what it really looks like. When comparing the iPhone and s23 yes you can see pros and cons but no one really can see how enhanced the photos are. I can't find a way to make the pictures look less exaggerated. I don't think we should have to resort to using pro settings every time. Has anyone foud a way to correct the photos? Debating on returning back to the note
Master255 said:
I recommend just switching to S22. It has no such problems and everything works automatically. With him you do not need to be a professional to just take a photo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure. Makes sens. Ditch the batter battery, go for exinos, leave the better and flatter display, the otherwise perfect performance for me, the better ram and storage, etc. I can also get a Nokia with a flash life.
Having in mind I own a semi pro camera, this is a solid advice.
Cheers!
Master255 said:
The battery in the s22 is exactly the same, the s22 also has snapdragon, the screen in the s23 is greener displays less details and has fewer colors compared to the s22, the RAM is exactly the same, the drive too. As you can see the camera is so professional in the s23 that ordinary users can not use it. So you don't lose anything by switching to the s22!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The things you are listing are not the same. I will get exinos cuz i am in the EU. The display is more energy efficient and i dont see the color stuff you are listing. It is a matter of set up.
The s23 ram is 5x, which means newer and faster. The storage is 4.0, which also means newer and faster, and more efficient
There is more in the s23U than the spec sheet tells in comparison to s22U.