Any 4.2 roms worth suggestion - Motorola Droid RAZR

Any 4.2 roms worth suggestion, I installed the new un-leaked JB and i lost root leading to safestrap being lost also. I had CM10.1 but i lost the .zip file and CM10.1 appears to be only for the ICS kernel. So back to my main point are there any STABLE, good roms with 4.2, thanks.

try this http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2162827&page=1 good stable AOKP rom and it has Kexec

AW: Any 4.2 roms worth suggestion
mr.noob said:
Any 4.2 roms worth suggestion, I installed the new un-leaked JB and i lost root leading to safestrap being lost also. I had CM10.1 but i lost the .zip file and CM10.1 appears to be only for the ICS kernel. So back to my main point are there any STABLE, good roms with 4.2, thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I think cm10.1 works now with kexecs too as some bugs were caused by the ics kernel... But my information is only for xt910
Sent from my XT910 using xda app-developers app

CM10.1
I think CM10.1 is a pretty good one. Their are some bugs, like no auto camera flash and gps , but its good for daily use. Also u schould have a look at the PAC ROM.
Max

CM10.1 is a pretty good ROM. It uses kexec. So, no matter if you have installed ICS or JB kernel.

Please visit the development section to find a ROM which fits your needs most.
Thread closed.

Related

CyanogenMod 10.1 becomes Officially Nightly

Just sharing the information I saw today in Google+:
Motorola Droid RAZR/RAZR MAXX (XT910) and Motorola Droid RAZR (XT912) are now officially supported by CyanogenMod Team.
As they said in this post, the developers who are porting this ROM to us joined the CM family.
You can see the Device page here:
CDMA
GSM
Hope we all could enjoy it's stable release soon!
wow I have been waiting for this, very awesome. I hope we can see stable builds soon :good::good::victory:
one thing I miss is BMM compability...
Based
Sorry, but i read all and dont see if this rom is ICS based or JB. Any know? I think is ICS
Lxledesma said:
Sorry, but i read all and dont see if this rom is ICS based or JB. Any know? I think is ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's CM10.1, based on Android 4.2.2
fredamsouza said:
It's CM10.1, based on Android 4.2.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know jaja, but my question is: for install CM0.1 official, I neet have a ICS kernel or JB kernel?
Lxledesma said:
I know jaja, but my question is: for install CM0.1 official, I neet have a ICS kernel or JB kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty sure its the ics kernel still
Full-Throttle Team
Fuzion Team
Android Aggression team
Lxledesma said:
I know jaja, but my question is: for install CM0.1 official, I neet have a ICS kernel or JB kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Per the web site: "This is for XT912 with stock ICS KERNEL ONLY!"
Awesome... hope they solve the bluetooth issue soon.
We'll likely see it stick to ICS Kernel only until a bit after the official Jelly Bean OTA, at which point you'll start to see dhacker and Hash switch things over permanently. I still can't believe that a new Motorola device is supported, much less one as locked down as Verizon has the CDMA version haha. Kudos to both dhacker and Hash for their hard work on all this.
Lxledesma said:
I know jaja, but my question is: for install CM0.1 official, I neet have a ICS kernel or JB kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a ICS kernel and safestrap, I install this in slot 4 and works fine.
Enviado desde mi XT910 usando Tapatalk 2
Great news! I'm glad all their hard work has paid off
Running it now. Works fine although there's still no Bluetooth and no flash.
Sent from my XT910 using xda app-developers app
Nikorasu said:
Awesome... hope they solve the bluetooth issue soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The bluetooth has been my biggest pet peeve with 10.1. I really wish I could use 10.1 daily but it doesn't make sense for me without bluetooth functioning correctly.
R: CyanogenMod 10.1 becomes Officially Nightly
cschuck320 said:
The bluetooth has been my biggest pet peeve with 10.1. I really wish I could use 10.1 daily but it doesn't make sense for me without bluetooth functioning correctly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my XT910 using xda app-developers app
Lxledesma said:
I know jaja, but my question is: for install CM0.1 official, I neet have a ICS kernel or JB kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did it with ICS Kernel, and Safestrap 3.11 on Slot-1-2GB. Worked as expected.
fredamsouza said:
I did it with ICS Kernel, and Safestrap 3.11 on Slot-1-2GB. Worked as expected.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Running this with the 20th March nightly on SS3.11. Wondering if anyone has been successful getting it working under BMM or if anyone has even tried with CWM? Happy it works under SS but kind of perfer the way BMM opperates and would like to give it a go... any thoughts ??
Many thanks,
:fingers-crossed:
AW: CyanogenMod 10.1 becomes Officially Nightly
Should be working I know many people who are using bmm
Here is one example:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=39392901
Sent from my XT910 using xda app-developers app
philharmonick said:
Running this with the 20th March nightly on SS3.11. Wondering if anyone has been successful getting it working under BMM or if anyone has even tried with CWM? Happy it works under SS but kind of perfer the way BMM opperates and would like to give it a go... any thoughts ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I'm using it at the moment, so the current kexec official builds definitely work with BMM
JFYI, the kexec official builds also work after performing the OTA JB EU update. Just removed SS3.11 saved root with OTA Root Keeper, Flashed (held breath) booted all good.. renabled root, reinstalled SS.. booted into recovery, selected by CM10.1, wiped cache and dalvic (a few times each for good measure) rebooted and away she goes... now I've got 4.1.2 Stock and CM10.1 4.2.2 under SS. Happy Days!
working fine with bmm.there are some issues.but it is good enough for daily use.:good:

[Q] JB OTA vs CM10.1 or AOKP

Hi Guys,
Might be a bit of a noob question but I'll shoot it off anyway. I'm currently happily running SS3.11 with UTMS_Spyder CM10.1Nightly with ICS EU 4.04 Stock on XT910. :victory:
Everything seems to work like a charm and I'm wondering if anyone can tell me what benefit there is to taking everything back to stock and flash the JB EU OTA?
Seems like until Hashcode and Dhacker get CM10.1 and AOKP running properly with JB Kernel I'd actaully be loosing functionality?
Any devs care to comment / clarify?
Cheers,
Phil
It's really just personal preference. There used to be a whole list of things that didn't work on AOKP/CM10 however Hashcode/Dhacker have worked extremely hard to iron them all out, it's really impressive. CM10 just updated to using the JB kernel meaning there is no more graphic tearing and battery life is almost the same as stock. Bluetooth problems were fixed last month. I think the only big bug left is automatic flash on the camera (however this still works when setting manually).
But to answer your question, technically running stock you are losing functionality. CM10/AOKP are running 4.2.2 while stock is 4.1.2 (I believe), meaning there's a whole bunch of features missing in stock. CM10/AOKP are being updated nightly meaning they will only improve while stock... well it's just stock. There wont be another update unless something is seriously wrong or Motorola decides to upgrade to the next AOS. Stock also includes a crapton of bloatware which slow down the phone. Even if you manually remove/freeze everything, I still believe CM10/AOKP to have better performance than stock any day. Hope this answers your questions
Sv: [Q] JB OTA vs CM10.1 or AOKP
I just love the customizations that cm 10.1 gives you. I can never go back to stock again. I also run the hotplug governor un order to save battery (one cpu shuts down when not in use) with noop scheduler. This tips were given by the poster above! Try cm and you'll never go back!
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
Is there an AOSP ROM that works with the leak JB kernel that the camera and tearing is fixed or only the soak kernel?
-Sent from Marino's Razr Maxx-
Many thanks
I Am Marino said:
Is there an AOSP ROM that works with the leak JB kernel that the camera and tearing is fixed or only the soak kernel?
-Sent from Marino's Razr Maxx-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well then... I think the decision is easy. Wait for Moto to release JB Fastboot and the amazing devs here to make a root tool and update CM10.1.
Why take a step backwards from available functionality for an official OTA.
Cheers Guys,
:fingers-crossed:
Latest AOSP ROM posted http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2162827 is really good only bug is camera flash ....other bugs have been fixed great rom for daily use....
assassin34 said:
Latest AOSP ROM posted http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2162827 is really good only bug is camera flash ....other bugs have been fixed great rom for daily use....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I was running AOKP previously but have paid version of Juice Defender which started complaining that it didn't like ASOP base and I should switch to Cyanogenmod. Besides that compatabililty issue though I do really like AOKP ROM.. and did find it both fast and very stable.

Recommend a rom for p7500

Can anyone recommend a stable rom for my tab? (p7500)
Ive recently rooted and want a stable rom that will maximise battery life.
Im currently on 4.04 ics. Ideally I would like JB but unsure which one due to all different models of tab and which roms are compatible with my tablet?
Thanks.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
If you want jellybean for the 7500 CM10.1 is going to be your best bet right now. That or the Ganbarou ROM. For ICS the Jellybean ROM from Toldo is available, and I think maybe Bindroid has a 3g option...not sure about that one though...
Best thing you can do is try them all and see what works best! Just remember that the filesystem for Android is different on tablets for 4.2 ROMs so make sure you read up about the /0 folder and how to move your files around if you go back and forth. Happy flashing!

[Q] Little help with info with Roms

So I finally cracked and Rooted and installed safe strap for rooms a few weeks back. I've been running the Cyanogen JB rom since. As nice as the mod is, it just has to many bugs for me. I did remember to back up my original ICS, but I don't want to go back.
So a while back I saw people recommending Roms for stability, but can't find that thread what so ever, I've found the Dev thread on all the Roms available, but am looking for a JB rom that is stable, so any recommendation?
Also, just because I couldn't find an answer anywhere, when I install a second Rom on my phone, should i delete the Cyanogen mod and just use that partition and install the new Rom, or use one of the other partitions and then delete the Cyanogen mod partition?
Thanks guys
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2174390
here is a stable rom. it's CDMA. for GSM flash gsm patch after flash rom, then reboot
for second rom just flash it onto second system, follow OP instruction
Try avatar rom. Seems like a pretty solid rom. Lots of cool features. Though it is based off of cm 10.1 so it may have the same bugs. But it is still worth a try.
Sent from my XT912 using xda app-developers app
I like the Liquid Smooth rom very much - stable, fast and good looking.

[Q] So i'm willing to Flash CM10.1.3 Stable on my i9100, I need assistance, Please :)

Good day,
So First of all i have a Samsung Galaxy SII Gt-i9100 with Official Kernel and 4.1.2Jb
Overall, Jelly bean is good but not on the S2, still a noticable speed difference with its successor i9300
I Looked up some ROMS on Cyanogen website, And i looked for Stable roms, and the latest stable version is this one
http://download.cyanogenmod.org/?device=i9100&type=stable
I really don't know what they exactly mean by "Stable" and All i'm worried about is the battery life, i want a better battery life than the one i already have, and i would really appreciate some guidance from you experienced S2 users in choosing a custom Kernel that suits my needs which are nothing but good battery life and no random reboots. i heard Siyah kernels are pretty good and cyanogen's too.
And all Cyanogen ROM Suggestions are highly appreciated.
Thanks for reading
OK......CM JB is gonna be more battery friendly than stock JB simply because of the lack of bloatware........
Please don't ask for kernel/ROM recommendations as this is against XDA rules.......
the idea is YOU try them out and YOU decide what is best for YOU.........
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
jadellah177 said:
Good day,
So First of all i have a Samsung Galaxy SII Gt-i9100 with Official Kernel and 4.1.2Jb
Overall, Jelly bean is good but not on the S2, still a noticable speed difference with its successor i9300
I Looked up some ROMS on Cyanogen website, And i looked for Stable roms, and the latest stable version is this one
http://download.cyanogenmod.org/?device=i9100&type=stable
I really don't know what they exactly mean by "Stable" and All i'm worried about is the battery life, i want a better battery life than the one i already have, and i would really appreciate some guidance from you experienced S2 users in choosing a custom Kernel that suits my needs which are nothing but good battery life and no random reboots. i heard Siyah kernels are pretty good and cyanogen's too.
And all Cyanogen ROM Suggestions are highly appreciated.
Thanks for reading
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
use cm10.1.3 is it the best most battery friendly ,actually most of cm nightlys are ok for daily usage u can even try cm11m3 its also almost stable ,there are many options for custom kernels in stock ,u choose the best for yourself ,for cm and other aosp/aokp roms use the provided kernel for stock bestrecommendation is dorimanx kernel
keithross39 said:
OK......CM JB is gonna be more battery friendly than stock JB simply because of the lack of bloatware........
Please don't ask for kernel/ROM recommendations as this is against XDA rules.......
the idea is YOU try them out and YOU decide what is best for YOU.........
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the clarification, But trying all kernels available will be just a total waste of time and energy, although i'm actually thinking about flashing the cm10.1.3, Do i have to change the kernel? can i just
download latest CWM,
flash it with odin,
do all wipes etc and
flash rom + gapps?
will this process change kernel? because cm10.1.3 doesn't come with any custom kernel inside the package..
All ROMs come with their own built in kernels......if you want to change this, it's up to you.....just gotta do your research first........
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
i'd suggest you to flash cm10.1.3 stable release or cm10.2 last nightly ( i guess 26th jan nightly was the last one ) as they both are stable and can be used as daily drivers . if the tag " stable " matters to you and of course , the battery too , try out Infected_'s EOL cm10.2.1 final release .. it is a stable release and is a bit faster than the official one as it is compiled using the linaro toolchain .. all the roms i mentioned are smooth , lagless , and yes , stable and battery friendly . i hope my suggestions are helpful and all the best ! #HappyFlashing

Categories

Resources