Related
AOSP Kernels for HTC's 8x50, 7x30, and 8x60 Devices
Also available for the Motorola Xoom
Tiamat kernels are designed for use on all ROMs that are built from the AOSP source code. This includes ROMs built from MIUI, CyanogenMod, and others.
Tiamat receives no support for use with ROMs based on HTC's Sense - use at your own risk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tiamat Kernels
You can find full details about Tiamat Kernels at our website. The site is up and running and serves as a more centralized location to get updates, downloads, and changelogs for all Tiamat Kernels. There is no forum or Registration, it’s just a more convenient way to keep things organized as we work to add support for more devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Support
Join the Tiamat Kernel developers on IRC at irc.freenode.net, #tiamat. Support and questions are generally handled faster there than the forums. You can easily join via webchat here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Special Thanks to:
toastcfh, slayher and the CyanogenMod team for the base kernels and everything else they do for the Android community
bcnice20 for generally being awesome
TeamWin for also generally being awesome
netarchy, chad0989, cuviper, and invisiblek for some great code
intersectRaven and redstar3894 for the Mjolnir compiler
JasonK75 for updating threads
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quick Links
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
8x50 Changelog
8x60 Changelog
7x30 Changelog
Downloads
FAQ
Source Code
reserved for later
This kernel has been around for the Inc and the Evo. Now I'm bringing it to the N1 and the Desire!!
Great stuff, always nice to have more kernel choices
MOD : Can you post only Nexus One kernel on your post please (more readable)
Had been having some wifi issues this past week using cm7 nightly along with various kernels. Wifi was frequently dropping or just very slow. Spent most of Sunday screwing with my home network which seems stable now. I think comcast must have been doing something. however, my phone wifi was still poor. installed this kernel last night and so far phone is performing as it should on wifi. the difference was immediate. not sure whats going on. cant comment on battery life yet, but it's looking very good through this mornings use. Thank you!
allofusjw said:
Had been having some wifi issues this past week using cm7 nightly along with various kernels. Wifi was frequently dropping or just very slow. Spent most of Sunday screwing with my home network which seems stable now. I think comcast must have been doing something. however, my phone wifi was still poor. installed this kernel last night and so far phone is performing as it should on wifi. the difference was immediate. not sure whats going on. cant comment on battery life yet, but it's looking very good through this mornings use. Thank you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm glad it's working for you, but that is strange... The only change I make to wifi from CM is undervolting it. And now that I think about it, I may have forgotten to bring that tweak over to the n1 and desire...
Can you summarize how your kernel differs from the others (CM, pershoot, wildmonks, redstar).
mr_raider said:
Can you summarize how your kernel differs from the others (CM, pershoot, wildmonks, redstar).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Versus the main CM kernel, this has unrestricted overclocking, HAVS, smartass, undervotling, sysfs interface and several other tweaks/improvements. I don't have a N1 and honestly dont know anything about the other kernels out there for it. The kernel started on the Inc and Evo, mostly around MIUI, and I was asked by a few people to bring it over to the N1 and Desire, so I figured I would post it up for everyone.
Hi all,
Been running this since 0800 this morning (its now 1800) no problems at all.
Can't say its faster or better on the battery for sure but its certainly no worse than CM stock.
Whats the smartass govenor? Just the same as on demand as it seems to replace it?
Oh, just one thing, although it has the option (in SetCPU) to go down to 128mhz, I've not seen it go lower than 245mhz which makes me wonder if its clocking down to 128 with the screen off.
Anyone else?
bryanchapman9999 said:
Hi all,
Been running this since 0800 this morning (its now 1800) no problems at all.
Can't say its faster or better on the battery for sure but its certainly no worse than CM stock.
Whats the smartass govenor? Just the same as on demand as it seems to replace it?
Oh, just one thing, although it has the option (in SetCPU) to go down to 128mhz, I've not seen it go lower than 245mhz which makes me wonder if its clocking down to 128 with the screen off.
Anyone else?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The on demand governor was removed to force the default to smartass (the default is usually set to on demand by the ramdisk and is not affected by setting the default in the kenrel), but the two are not similar. Smartass was built off the interactive governor.
As for the 128Mhz floor - that is something finicky about the smartass governor. It should drop to 128 on any other governor though.
Smartass Governor shows real potential...thanks for this!
what about the wonk?
From what I gather the wonk is due to something in CM7 kernel. I also noticed that it is absent from stock 2.3.3 and also absent from AOSP builds.
Has anyone tried CM7 with this kernel?
thanks for the N1 kernel.
I'll try ASAP.
I will try this kernel now, thanks for posting. New kernel cooks are always welcomed.
After about 18 hrs on this kernel, the results are pleasing.
Extremely stable on the Smartass Governor, which is surprising because I've had friends compile me kernels incorporating this governor, and the end result = unusable.
Battery life seems fantastic so far.
Clocked 128-998. No profiles.
Thank you again for this kernel.
Results on N1
I have been running this kernel for 24hrs at 128/1228 and it's been running great with smartass selected on my AT&T N1. I tried going even higher than 1228 but that causes it to crash immediately (I'm surprised it can even handle 1228.) Linpack is a little low at 23 compared to other kernels that can get up to 40. Quadrant also comes up behind at only 1051.
tried going at the highest setting & it crashed my N1 , BACK TO RESDTAR'S kernel .
Been using the kernel for a few hours, Kernel seems stable but definatly doesnt feel snappy.
phewizzo said:
Been using the kernel for a few hours, Kernel seems stable but definatly doesnt feel snappy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same here, got some freeze
btw oc at 1267 without any crash
Thread closed.
Thread closed..
Thread closed...
Thread closed...
Thread closed.....
Reserved.
amazing!
will try it on SlimBean rom
thanks mate
SignalX said:
amazing!
will try it on SlimBean rom
thanks mate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just gimme another hour or so, I've a few Linux versions to go to be at 3.0.52
JP.
Hey JP!
Nice to see you made an aosp kernel,bravo!
I was considering trying an aosp based rom but i was wondering...
Are there any bugs or anything that's not working on aosp roms compared to sammy ones?
The last thing i remember that was an issue(a long time ago... )
Was that cm10 had memory leak,which now is fixed...
nfsmw_gr said:
Hey JP!
Nice to see you made an aosp kernel,bravo!
I was considering trying an aosp based rom but i was wondering...
Are there any bugs or anything that's not working on aosp roms compared to sammy ones?
The last thing i remember that was an issue(a long time ago... )
Was that cm10 had memory leak,which now is fixed...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I've been running Paranoid Android 2.54 for one day with stock kernel, and I liked it that much that I decided to "port" my Sammy kernel to CM10, or to be more precise, to add the same mods to a CM10 base as those I added to the Sammy kernel.
I'm test-compiling 3.0.45 right now, next step will be 3.0.52
JP.
Ok, time to shoot, here it is, just readily cooked, be carefull, still hot
Changelog v1.0
Based on CyanogenMod CM10 kernel for i9300 sources (Linux 3.0.31)
updated to kernel.org Linux 3.0.52
using Paranoid Android 2.54 ramdisk
swap support
/proc/config.gz support
optimized for size
Aroma installer with options
USB Forced Fast Charge v1.2a (Yank555.lu)
CPU OC up to 1.6GHz (Yank555.lu)
Triangle Away support (Chainfire)
Dynamic fsync control (faux123)
TCP westwood congest ctrl (faux123)
Proport. Rate Reduction TCP (faux123)
ARM AES/SHA1 (faux123)
JIT compiler for packet filters(faux123)
fix ipv6 protocol lookup (faux123)
ipv4 check ret.val. dst_alloc (faux123)
ipv6 check ret.val. dst_alloc (faux123)
updated LZO compression (faux123)
do_fsync() to fget_light() (faux123)
reduce mali utilization sampling timeout (AndreiLux)
mdnie: custom settings (AndreiLux)
Includes hardcore sharpnes fixes, and black gamma curve adjustment for black crush
ntfs (rw) support (kernel support only)
zram support (Android optimized)
Download link (MD5 fd4bbc970ef350621a8a3ed9c8003e8c)
Please do consider this v1.0 as beta, I've started working on this CM10 kernel this evening, and it's just done compiling, so you're testing this with me
Yank555 said:
Well I've been running Paranoid Android 2.54 for one day with stock kernel, and I liked it that much that I decided to "port" my Sammy kernel to CM10, or to be more precise, to add the same mods to a CM10 base as those I added to the Sammy kernel.
I'm test-compiling 3.0.45 right now, next step will be 3.0.52
JP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see...
Looking good!
Is anything not working or have bugs mate? (on the aosp side i mean not on your kernel)
I think you get that some want to have some info before flashing things on their phones.
nfsmw_gr said:
I see...
Looking good!
Is anything not working or have bugs mate? (on the aosp side i mean not on your kernel)
I think you get that some want to have some info before flashing things on their phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well the base (CM10 stock kernel) behaved perfectly well, today (I've not used it any longer, as I got my second S3 only yesterday )
So far, I'm running v1.0 since I compiled it about 1 hour ago, looking peachy, but well 1 hour is quite a little too short to make any conclusions.
JP.
Yank555 said:
Well the base (CM10 stock kernel) behaved perfectly well, today (I've not used it any longer, as I got my second S3 only yesterday )
So far, I'm running v1.0 since I compiled it about 1 hour ago, looking peachy, but well 1 hour is quite a little too short to make any conclusions.
JP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A second S3, wow. :silly:
I use this kernel with Helly_Bean (CM10) and everything is just fine!
Can I change the voltage settings and the touch-boost level?
Thanks!
BenjaminX2 said:
A second S3, wow. :silly:
I use this kernel with Helly_Bean (CM10) and everything is just fine!
Can I change the voltage settings and the touch-boost level?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Voltage control is something I'm not keen on introducing, as it brings close to no battery gain (nothing you could actually really measure) but adds a whole lot of risk of instability, especially users pushing the limits or even slightly above I wouldn't want any flooding with weird random reboot reports due to this
CPU and GPU (governor) behaviour is stock (except for the CPU OC ti 1.6GHz).
JP.
Yank555 said:
Voltage control is something I'm not keen on introducing, as it brings close to no battery gain (nothing you could actually really measure) but adds a whole lot of risk of instability, especially users pushing the limits or even slightly above I wouldn't want any flooding with weird random reboot reports due to this
CPU and GPU (governor) behaviour is stock (except for the CPU OC ti 1.6GHz).
JP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like to undervolt the CPU 100mV and the GPU 25/50mV. That is stable for me and reduces the temperature of the phone a bit. Most noticeable with the touch boost turned down to 200 MHz.
Let's see if a governor change can help.
BenjaminX2 said:
I like to undervolt the CPU 100mV and the GPU 25/50mV. That is stable for me and reduces the temperature of the phone a bit. Most noticeable with the touch boost turned down to 200 MHz.
Let's see if a governor change can help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure using a different gogernor than pegasusq is going to work well...
UV for temperature might be a good idea, but not for better battery as that doesn't realy make any measurable difference, brings only the risk of instability.
JP.
Sent from my Paranoid Android 2.54 / Yank555.lu CM10 kernel v1.0 (3.0.52) powered Galaxy S3 i9300 using Tapatalk 2
Okay,i switched over from hoxhound to helly bean and i must say this is great!
Your kernel works fine here...
I really really reallyyyy hope you update this kernel like the other one!
nfsmw_gr said:
Okay,i switched over from hoxhound to helly bean and i must say this is great!
Your kernel works fine here...
I really really reallyyyy hope you update this kernel like the other one!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will keep them in line each time I change something that can fit both
Just moved my daily to PA, switched S3, the white one's in my pocket now
So no worries there
JP.
Sent from my custom ARHD 14.0 / Yank555.lu JB kernel v2.5 Aroma (JB-U6 / Linux 3.0.52) powered Galaxy S3 i9300 using Tapatalk 2
Yank555 said:
Will keep them in line each time I change something that can fit both
Just moved my daily to PA, switched S3, the white one's in my pocket now
So no worries there
JP.
Sent from my custom ARHD 14.0 / Yank555.lu JB kernel v2.5 Aroma (JB-U6 / Linux 3.0.52) powered Galaxy S3 i9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's great man!Cheers!
I've received different recommendations from everybody I talked to, but I would like to know what custom kernel people love most right now. I'm running simple rooted version of 4.2.2 right now with the stock kernel. I'm looking for something to improve battery life a bit and get rid of the weird graphical hiccups that can take place when rapidly switching tasks.
Let's hear it. Thanks.
Sent from my Nexus 10 using xda app-developers app
lr4life said:
I've received different recommendations from everybody I talked to, but I would like to know what custom kernel people love most right now. I'm running simple rooted version of 4.2.2 right now with the stock kernel.
Let's hear it. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been using Franco Kernel since the start and it's worked great. Definitely helps with thermal throttling issues.
lr4life said:
I've received different recommendations from everybody I talked to, but I would like to know what custom kernel people love most right now. I'm running simple rooted version of 4.2.2 right now with the stock kernel.
Let's hear it. Thanks.
Sent from my Nexus 10 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using KTManta. Works pretty well and I can recommend.
Sent from my Nexus 10 with XDA Premium HD. ROM: AOKP PUB 4.4.2 Kernel: KTManta
Ktmanta is definitely the best kernel on nexus 10, and other devices for that matter. Load it up with the ktweaker app, set it to ktoonservative and row, and :good:
Franco seems to have a cult following, but the kernel just isn't where Ktmanta is at by any means.
Using KTManta, and loving it. I've tried all the others and keep coming back to KTManta. Behind that I would go with Morfic's Trinity kernel.
Franco and Trinity are great kernels that give smooth performance and good battery. KTmanta is also a smooth kernel though and has far more options and tweaks than the other kernels. By default you wont see that much difference on it over the stock kernel though, since ktoonsez does not like to set too many settings different than what stock has for its defaults. But you can easily load up his free tweaking program, or run Trickster MOD, and set any options you want. The ktoonservative governor is by far the best governor for this tablet.
Definitely KTManta great overall performance
Trinity for life.
KTManta
SLP and ZEN for best benchmark score
Ktoonservative and ZEN for best user experience (Which is all that matters)
Trinity little more soft and not so heat producing like other kernels, little help for battery also ..
Ktmanta its too laggy sometimes and not so much help to the battery like most of here are screaming..
Sent from my Nexus 10 using xda app-developers app
There is no such thing as `the best' in the specific sense of the question.. They're free.. Go download them and try them yourself. Pick the one "you" feel is the best. Polling the forum isn't going to help you. You know what they say about opinions...
I like franco.Kernel. Can't say it's the best or not though since I really didn't do any in-depth testing.
Plenty kernel I try, at the end, I still back to custom ROM stock kernel.
franco - some issue and not stable.
KTManta - I still not sure why this is so famous, not the best in performance, even after use some people setting, it was better but not really great, and hang up sometimes especially when use certain I/O setting.
Trinity - Quite nice actually, not much to complain about it, but I don't see a need to use it.
By the way, I am happily running mrRobinson AOKP ROM with it own kernel.
I'm actually quite happy with KTManta, using the Zen scheduler and ktoonservative governor. Extremely smooth, lag free, with good battery.
... beamed from my Nexus 10 to your planet
Andrewtst said:
[*]KTManta - I still not sure why this is so famous, not the best in performance, even after use some people setting, it was better but not really great, and hang up sometimes especially when use certain I/O setting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure how that happened. Using suggested settings this is the best performing kernel for me. If you're randomly messing with I/o settings yeah it can cause issues but I wouldn't suggest doing that unless you know what everything does KT + zen(minor tweaks) + ktoonservative + UV = battery and performance for me
Sent from my Nexus 10 using XDA Premium HD app
Andrewtst said:
Plenty kernel I try, at the end, I still back to custom ROM stock kernel.
franco - some issue and not stable.
KTManta - I still not sure why this is so famous, not the best in performance, even after use some people setting, it was better but not really great, and hang up sometimes especially when use certain I/O setting.
Trinity - Quite nice actually, not much to complain about it, but I don't see a need to use it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There have been a couple releases with issues for me on KTManta kernel, but a couple releases out of the 20 or so versions is not much. The issues are quickly fixed and a new version put out anyway so maybe you just happened to come in and try it on one of those releases. This kernel is so popular because it has the most active dev and the most options.
And why do you think the Franco kernel is not stable?
For what its worth, Im partial to Franco's r3 kernel--having tested the others. It improved my overall web browsing smoothness on 4.2.2 which is all I was looking for after moving from 4.2.1. As previously stated, what's "best" for me may not be "best" for others. Cheers!
Kernels much like silicon slabs are unique...each device will respond differently. Try em all...and pick your favorite.
Sent from my SGH-T889
You know actually.....
They are all good, if you know what you are doing.
Trinity and Franco are the best if you just want to set and forget. KTmanta is the best if you want to tweak and have options to play with.
There are any disadvantages to go back to ice cream sandwich 4.0 version? Now I have custom 4.4.2 and it is laggy no matter what.
P7500
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda premium
Lior84 said:
There are any disadvantages to go back to ice cream sandwich 4.0 version? Now I have custom 4.4.2 and it is laggy no matter what.
P7500
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perhaps you could try one of the lollipop versions. They (both aosp and Omni) are really stable. If you however need 3G I would suggest the aosp rom.
There's no harm in trying them out. If you still feel that they lag to much you can always go back to stock.
I've been running the aosp rom on my wifi tab for some time now and it performs pretty great actually.
Pretty great you mean responsive? Because I use omni 4.4.2 and it's laggy no matter what I do.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda premium
Lior84 said:
Pretty great you mean responsive? Because I use omni 4.4.2 and it's laggy no matter what I do.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, responsive. I did overclock it to 1400mhz but it's running stable. Only youtube is sometimes not the best when running 720p videos.
Not responsive :/
Is it smooth when using chrome, scrolling and doing other activities?
Tell me the best settings to get it fast with Lollipop.
P.S: i suggest the cm10.2 ROM with tabletUI if you want smooth scrolling and graphics.
Mast3rC22 said:
Is it smooth when using chrome, scrolling and doing other activities?
Tell me the best settings to get it fast with Lollipop.
P.S: i suggest the cm10.2 ROM with tabletUI if you want smooth scrolling and graphics.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can only speak from my experience with the aosp rom but scrolling in Chrome is smooth, I'm also using Nova Launcher and it is overclocked to 1400 mhz. Please don't expect miracles from this old device that samsung gave up on one ago. It runs 5.1.1 as smooth as it can. Also don't expect any hard core gaming and youtube will sometimes have issues. If all these things are deal-breakers then stay with whatever you have now. I wrote this from my own experience with my own tab. My father has the same one else only that one is bone stock. Touch wiz and everything with only a handful of apps installed. And yes it runs smooth and has less "issues" but it's running 4.0.4... I hope my explanation helps you make an informed decision.
Lior84 said:
There are any disadvantages to go back to ice cream sandwich 4.0 version? Now I have custom 4.4.2 and it is laggy no matter what.
P7500
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was considering the same. I was on 4.4 omni, seemed laggy. Flashed stock ICS, which did seem snappy but still bloated. I thought I'd give AOSP 5.1 a go. Haven't over clocked anything and its definitely smoother than 4.4 omni. Very compact ROM, I installed gapps and that only set google play. Currently tested WiFi and GPS and they're working. Chrome is smooth and running flash smoothly. Auto detected resolution on YouTube.com is smooth. Haven't tried YouTube app as yet. I normally use tubemate anyway. This tab will always have trouble playing 1080p vid. Max I go now is 720. Tried and its working fine using mxplayer. 5.1 is still in social testing but the bugs are slowly being fixed. I was on ICS for a long time as it performed well. Having experienced the same with 4.4 and now upgrading to this rom , I'm happy with how smooth and responsive it is. Ticks the boxes.
My main concern is lags. I run omni 4.4 on with nova and the response is disappointing.
Most of the time, my son use it to watch movies, YouTube and some games but nothing really hard. When I take it to do some stuff on it, the lags just giving me crazy. I know that the main problem is lack of RAM but hey, with 4.0.4 it works OK.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda premium
Going back does mean stability. The way I look at it though is you can only put so much into a mini, but it will always be a mini, not a Ferrari. Lollipop seems to work OK but its stretching the capability of this tab. For me with minor tweaks its going OK. A goto software always on all my droids is Greenify. It kills all the apps lingering in the background and stops them from opening again unless I open them. Try it out, you need all the ram you can get outta these older tabs. With the paid version it also kills system apps like google play services which is a big ram hog. I guess the only way you'll make your mind up is give ICS a go for a few days then try LP and see what you think.
A lollipop ROM might be smoother, if there would be the "Performance" menu in the settings app (like CM12).
If anyone has got any cyanogenmod ROM, i suggest these settings:
CPU governor:
• Intellidemand/ondemand: The CPU will increase the frequency when needed. It's default in many kernels. I really suggest that, because the device will be very stable (and smooth) and the battery life will be quite good :good: ;
• Performance: The CPU frequency will be set to max setting;
• Powersave: The CPU frequency will be set to minimum setting.
CPU min frequency: 150mhz (max. 200mhz)
CPU max frequency: overclock to 1400Mhz (do not overclock to 1.5 or 1.6ghz, the cpu will freeze and might be damaged)
I/O scheduler: deadline
zRam: 18%
Resources clean: on
KSM: on
PS: Enable "Set on boot" to each menu.
Sorry for the worst english ever.
I like decatf's 5.1 AOSP rom. He put a lot of work into creating a wrapper for hwcomposer which does a better job translating some of the newer rendering apis to work with the ancient ics binary Nvidia video driver blobs. That's why videos and animations are much smoother on his rom than the alternatives and why you don't get that weird "lightning bolt" rendering effect that's been around since pershoot's cyanogen jelly bean roms. He also implemented an audio driver wrapper as well in the same vein. And if you use his TWRP version, you can format /cache and /data to use f2fs, which definitely helps with disk I/O. He even ported over Multirom so you can dual-boot, but alas, it doesn't boot Ice Cream Sandwich roms at the moment.
It's the best modern rom thus far for the original Tab 10.1. Other than proper modern and native Nvidia drivers updated for Lollipop, the only thing really holding back the original 10.1 at this point is the Tegra 2's lack of NEON support. But there's nothing decatf can do about that.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk
This is loosely based on CTXz's kernel. I just wanted a little more from it. I'm using it on my "Nook". Hence the name.
So may I present to you.....
Nuki - Kernel
Install:
Just flash this through TWRP recovery. I use 2.8.7.0. It'll do it's own wipes.
It's built for the "Nook" version. But should work for any WiFi only ROM.
My preferred tuner for the kernel is Kernel Audiutor . But others should work also.
Changelog
V1.1 - Ubertec and Linaro toolchains
Enabled KSM and tweaked
init.d support
Selinux permissive
V1
OC to 1344mhz
Intelliplug 3.9
govs added - lionheart, pegasusq, conservativeX, darkness, nightmare.
Shedulers - sio, vr, zen. I haven't been able to get "row" to compile without errors.
Frandom
Lots of tweaks/optimizations
Downloads:
Nuki-V1.1-Linaro
Nuki-V1.1-Uber
Nuki-V1
Stock-OG1-Nook-Kernel
Thanks to
@CTXz
@laufersteppenwolf
@friedrich420
And the ton of other git's I went through to get this.
XDA:DevDB Information
[Kernel] Nuki-Stock-T230NU, Kernel for the Samsung Galaxy Tab 4
Contributors
engine95
Source Code: https://github.com/engine95/Degaswifi-CPU-tweaks.git
Kernel Special Features:
Version Information
Status: Stable
Stable Release Date: 2015-10-17
Created 2015-10-17
Last Updated 2015-10-17
reserved
Mine! Will post feedcack! :fingers-crossed:
@engine95 - awesome. Gonna test it out and let you know
Looking good. Confirm working looking the SM-T230NU......should work on SM-T230 as well.
Well done. I hope it works good for you all!
Just a little update.
I'm trying to work on the GPU now, and it's proving very interesting. This GC1000 GPU treats the cores as being separate. Meaning one is for 2d @ 416mhz the other is for [email protected]
It looks like our possible freq's are 533, 624, 702. And maybe one close to 800 according to the specs.
The problem I see happening, is that we'll be locked into whatever freq I build into it. Meaning there isn't a way to change it through a kernel tuner.
So far, I havent had any luck OC'ing either of them. But we'll see what happens.
V1.1 is in OP See read changelog
Still no luck with OC GPU. But theres 2 builds: Linaro and Ubertec toolchains. Let me know which one you like/prefer.
Enjoy
Nice
so what's the point?
new features?
overclocked?
emoboy (Official Name!)
Nice
so what's the point?
new features?
overclocked?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know you. So I don't know if this is sarcastic or not. So I'll play this answer in the middle.
Read the change log and look at the git. Almost everything here has been reworked, updated and/or added. Oc is the only thing I haven't touched. Yet.
@engine95 - for me, my tablet runs smoother on the linaro build.
Nice update and thank you.
g_ding84 said:
@engine95 - for me, my tablet runs smoother on the linaro build.
Nice update and thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
On my past kernels, Ubertec seems to usually run faster. While Linaro runs smoother. But on this tab, it's harder to tell. So Thanks for letting me know. :good:
I am impressed with a lot of the optimizations that "Sammy" has already build into this. Source code I'm used to changing is already in it. And this thing sleeps like a baby.
It's too bad Marvell/Vivante/Sammy has throttled this CPU/GPU so much according to the specs. I mean, for a low-end setup it could be a lot better. But then, it would probably lose battery.
I'm not going to add anymore "stuffs" to it, as I think we have a good selection now. What is in it should satisfy " battery thru performance" depending on the settings people choose.
I haven't even looked a OC CPU yet. All I've tried so far is GPU and that hasn't gone well.
These will be the next things I'll work on. Unless......"SQUIRREL!"
forgive my ignorance, normally i would use the googles and xdas to educate myself before asking such a question, however, I have basically given up on this tablet.....so does your development of this kernel bring the tab 4 7" owners any close to getting an aosp build, this tablet is useless running TW?
edit: upon review, my post was thankless but i am very thankful for you doing what you do for this tablet, it so needs the attention!
gammaxgoblin said:
forgive my ignorance, normally i would use the googles and xdas to educate myself before asking such a question, however, I have basically given up on this tablet.....so does your development of this kernel bring the tab 4 7" owners any close to getting an aosp build, this tablet is useless running TW?
edit: upon review, my post was thankless but i am very thankful for you doing what you do for this tablet, it so needs the attention!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its all good. No worries.
Unfortunately, no. It just improves on stock.
Im new to Samsung, so its all a new learning curve for me. I am kinda shocked at how "low-end " this is for a mainstream tablet. I'd have thought it would be.....better.
T-230 with nuki v1.1 linaro. Working amazingly. Thank you much.
Thank you for this kernel! I've never even thought to use another kernel for this low-end device.
Mine was originally the Nook version as well but I have flashed the latest non-nook firmware and heavily modded it.
I'm using the Linaro version. Xposed is running with a few modules. tuning with Kernel Audiutor.
The device it running very well. smoother than normal. It's a bit warmer too. but we'll see about that though.
Uber variant. Makes a huge difference. Thank you!!!
Still using the linaro. I can't seem to make either of the CPU frequencies stop being max. (1344)
Any suggestions? I'll end up trying the Uber kernel in a moment.
brossovitch said:
Still using the linaro. I can't seem to make either of the CPU frequencies stop being max. (1344)
Any suggestions? I'll end up trying the Uber kernel in a moment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When you reboot, you'll need to set min, manually. I don't know why.
Or, try a different gov. Lionheart and conservativex are my preference.
You may need to remove the set on boot option, then reenable it.
It shouldn't be sticking like that
Mhh, that all sounds very interesting. Possible I can test it this weekend.
CTXz kernel is my first choice all that last year, so I can test it against yours. Don't get me wrong it will be very interesting to see what's different.
Not to see what is better, I wish to see the difference. Every ROM has his specific use and modifications. So it is the science guy who wish to know it .
Will report later about it and CTXz I will be every time a fan of your work .