/* 10 char rm */
Is that number accurate? 'cause if the screen time and total are correct, then this is some mighty impressive work.
please make it for sense too.
thnaks
michaelalias said:
Is that number accurate? 'cause if the screen time and total are correct, then this is some mighty impressive work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any idea to know what the actual screen on time is from that image?
im gonna test this and come back with some results. thanks so much for the share!! mind if I ask, would you ever impliment the logo2menu options to use the logo as a menu button instead of having to have soft buttons? Still going to try it out! Thanks again.
New version uploaded
FIXED: incall volume
adwinp said:
New version uploaded
FIXED: incall volume
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xda rules ask that op post source within 24-48hours of posting publicly consumed kernels
Looking forward to seeing the contribution to th community
Sent from my HTC One using xda app-developers app
adwinp said:
1f: I don't host a git; I'll release the source (prolly in tar/xz) once I iron out a few bugs - don't ask when. The base is from CM with some patches from CAF, backports from vanilla 3.9/3.10, faux' intellidemand cpu governor, some other interesting patches from githubs/bitbuckets & the rest, my patches.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We are not asking you to post your sources, GPL and XDA REQUIRE you too.
You have up to this time tomorrow to post your source one way or another or this thread will be deleted and your account will be looked into further with maybe infractions.
Thank you
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/xda-developers-and-the-gpl/
Mikey said:
We are not asking you to post your sources, GPL and XDA REQUIRE you too.
You have up to this time tomorrow to post your source one way or another or this thread will be deleted and your account will be looked into further with maybe infractions.
Thank you
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/xda-developers-and-the-gpl/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then by any means do delete this thread. I still have quite a few bugs to work on & I don't want to release the source in its current state.
adwinp said:
Then by any means do delete this thread. I still have quite a few bugs to work on & I don't want to release the source in its current state.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, as with a lot of developers you can upload your source as is and slowly push commits as you fix things and implement more features
poondog said:
Hi, as with a lot of developers you can upload your source as is and slowly push commits as you fix things and implement more features
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This contributes to our whole community
Sent from my HTC One using xda app-developers app
Thread closed. OP, you may report this thread when you want it to be reopened
Related
Hi there,
Im trying to compile an AOSP build. My device (toshiba Thrive) has Honeycomb and there is no source for it, hence there is no public GIT with a device tree or source of any kind rather than the kernel source.
Question is, how can I add my device to the lunch menu if I don't have any files to put in there? Also, if I compile for a different device, i.e. Xoom since it had Tegra2 support built in, what are the chances of porting that just by swapping bins, libs, etc files, and so on?
I'm guessing that the kernel is compiled during the process based on those proprietary files..... correct?
Bump
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Sorry, forgot to quote you in case you felt the need to edit your post
Ok, let's all take a visit to chill-town. If you don't like the thread, just ignore it. This isn't a snark contest, and no one wins a cupie doll.
And to the OP, it's best not to bump your own thread. Just be patient.
Peace.
Farmer Ted said:
And to the OP, it's best not to bump your own thread. Just be patient.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For that I am sorry. Please close this thread.
Sorry mate to post in a closed thread but i did it just to let you know that i've deleted some replies that are not in THE SPIRIT OF XDA.
Farmer Ted said:
Ok, let's all take a visit to chill-town. If you don't like the thread, just ignore it. This isn't a snark contest, and no one wins a cupie doll.
And to the OP, it's best not to bump your own thread. Just be patient.
Peace.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does anyone have a step by step guide to setup a kernel development environment for the HTC Flyer.
I am new to this and I cannot get the environment setup correctly
Please someone help or does anyone have an image of there dev machine
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using XDA Premium HD app
Anyone??
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using XDA Premium HD app
Start searching. If you can't find the info yourself, then you probably aren't going to do much good as a kernel "dev". Also read up on GPL, they are getting stricter about it around here and as such there are rules as to what you can post ROM/kernel wise. I would avoid any kitchens, and do it all from scratch. I'll give you two links though.
Toolchain: https://github.com/DooMLoRD/android_prebuilt_toolchains
Source: http://www.htcdev.com/devcenter/downloads
That and a Ubuntu machine are all you need to get going. Just as a warning, takinga image of somebody's dev machine, and then pulling Leedroid's or Doomlord's source code and compiling is not building your own kernel. Start from scratch, google, search, learn and it's going to take a bit. I'd start with adding some extra CPU governor's if I were you, it's the easiest.
Oh and I'd wait more then two hours next time before bumping my own post, also google is a amazing thing. Did you try it.
http://forums.androidcentral.com/ht...how-build-your-own-kernel-package-source.html
Some very nice and helpfull thoughts there.
First steps r always hard. With proper help they can get much easyer. U prolly wouldnt be walking if u wouldnt recive a help from your parents.
Ioiwillioi asked for help. He said he is new in kernel developing. He said he is having some problems with seting up. I am sure he is mature enought he knows for web search.
Not all ppl like to build their knewladge base up from scratch with no help... After all we all benefit on other ppl knewladge and take shortcuts... If u dont feel same then burn all books, cut off internet and do all from scratch.
Google search has some disadvantages as well not onlly Google knows it all syndrome...
Now if u can help him with going faster in proces please do.
Help or stfu?
Fake edit: IoiWilliI that bump... u siriuslly could do it faster lol
ninja edit:
IoiWillloI is Sensles HC rom developer. I seen first post at his early atempts:
"With all due respect, but adding an APK, swapping some files etc., is not an useful contribution for the community. If you really want to add something, work on ICS instead We need more developers on that case, and it would be more useful than 10 HoneyComb ROMs"
Today some belive his rom is best HC rom for Flyer. Gl IoiWillioI with growing in kernel developing skilz.
You seriously think my post is unhelpful? If so I'm more then happy to delete it buddy.
thewadegeek said:
You seriously think my post is unhelpful? If so I'm more then happy to delete it buddy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I appreciate the help wadegeek however you could be a little bit more supportive, so far i have stuck to ROM stuff and even if i do say so myself i have done quite a good job, and i though rather than google it i thought i would ask in the forum that was designed for the device, (in case of any device specific requirements etc) i mean thats just logical thinking :O
I dont think jprednik meant any offense
Also thank you for all of the positive comments and feedback jprednik,
EDIT: Its my post i'll bump when i want to
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using XDA Premium HD app
ioiwillioi said:
I appreciate the help wadegeek however you could be a little bit more supportive, so far i have stuck to ROM stuff and even if i do say so myself i have done quite a good job, and i though rather than google it i thought i would ask in the forum that was designed for the device, (in case of any device specific requirements etc) i mean thats just logical thinking :O
I dont think jprednik meant any offense
Also thank you for all of the positive comments and feedback jprednik,
EDIT: Its my post i'll bump when i want to
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am being supportive, I'm just saying if you take some to look it up on your own you'll get to the exact sameplace. Also I believe spamming is against the forum rules, which was why I mentioned the post bumping. It wasn't really needed.
Sent from my SCH-R760 using Tapatalk 2
thewadegeek said:
I am being supportive,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No you're not. You're being the opposite of supportive.
Its not a step by step, but this thread on the Nook Color 3.0 for ICS Kernel development has some insights into what it takes.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1677219&highlight=kernel
Ok, THIS supportive enough?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1748297
And I answered all his questions. Being supportive does not equal babying him(or her...I think your a him).
helpfull
thx and yes i believe thats helpfull and suportive.
thewadegeek said:
Ok, THIS supportive enough?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1748297
And I answered all his questions. Being supportive does not equal babying him(or her...I think your a him).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Thanks.
thewadegeek said:
Start searching. If you can't find the info yourself, then you probably aren't going to do much good as a kernel "dev". Also read up on GPL, they are getting stricter about it around here and as such there are rules as to what you can post ROM/kernel wise. I would avoid any kitchens, and do it all from scratch. I'll give you two links though.
Toolchain: https://github.com/DooMLoRD/android_prebuilt_toolchains
Source: http://www.htcdev.com/devcenter/downloads
That and a Ubuntu machine are all you need to get going. Just as a warning, takinga image of somebody's dev machine, and then pulling Leedroid's or Doomlord's source code and compiling is not building your own kernel. Start from scratch, google, search, learn and it's going to take a bit. I'd start with adding some extra CPU governor's if I were you, it's the easiest.
Oh and I'd wait more then two hours next time before bumping my own post, also google is a amazing thing. Did you try it.
http://forums.androidcentral.com/ht...how-build-your-own-kernel-package-source.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right another question ,
Once i have the Zimage what do i have to do with it, i know about building it into a boot.img but when i flash my kernel the cpu values etc don't appear to change :/ is it something i need to specify in the .config prior to building or is it something i do in the process of zimage to boot.img ?
That would all be in the config file. Are you using LeeDroid's CPU frequency tables? And if you started your source from scratch, did you add anything to Kconfig? I would really need to take a look at your source, do you have a Github? Or can you post exactly what you changed?
thewadegeek said:
That would all be in the config file. Are you using LeeDroid's CPU frequency tables? And if you started your source from scratch, did you add anything to Kconfig? I would really need to take a look at your source, do you have a Github? Or can you post exactly what you changed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't change the kconfig :/ I can commit it to github later is that any good??
So the kernel compiles fine but there are no options to got about 1495 when trying to OC
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using XDA Premium HD app
Yep get it into a github and I'll take a look to see if I can help. You will need to make some changes to the different configs though. And out of curiosity, which kernel did you pull your .config from? Or did you use a default from arch/arm/configs?
thewadegeek said:
Yep get it into a github and I'll take a look to see if I can help. You will need to make some changes to the different configs though. And out of curiosity, which kernel did you pull your .config from? Or did you use a default from arch/arm/configs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock HC config and will get it to got hub asap
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using XDA Premium HD app
Ok, I won't be able to take a serious look until this evening though.
This post I think is going to be quite helpful in my attempt to swing a bat at this dev stuff... thanks for the info folks
if crpalmer's kernel is based of elkay's which is based on dsb9938's and it pulls some source from a few others how do we keep them all straight? is crpalmer's based on the newest revisions of both other kernels? we need a comparison chart containing all the features of each kernel highlighting the differences and similarities of each.
by the wording in crpalmer's thread, assuming it's based on all the recent submits, then it would be the most recent update especially considering it uses linux 3.4.31 when the others use lower versions. (unless there is an even newer one i havn't read yet)
KyJelly69 said:
if crpalmer's kernel is based of elkay's which is based on dsb9938's and it pulls some source from a few others how do we keep them all straight? is crpalmer's based on the newest revisions of both other kernels? we need a comparison chart containing all the features of each kernel highlighting the differences and similarities of each.
by the wording in crpalmer's thread, assuming it's based on all the recent submits, then it would be the most recent update especially considering it uses linux 3.4.31 when the others use lower versions. (unless there is an even newer one i havn't read yet)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So make a chart then.
beaups said:
So make a chart then.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you clearly deserve a ribbon for most helpful.
If I knew what the differences were, or even how to find all of them, i would. but i sure as hell wouldn't share it with you.
KyJelly69 said:
you clearly deserve a ribbon for most helpful.
If I knew what the differences were, or even how to find all of them, i would. but i sure as hell wouldn't share it with you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's github links for each kernel in the their respective threads. I don't need a chart.
Now that's funny.
Then why are being a trolling ass? This topic obviously has nothing to do with you. This is the HELP section. If you want to be a jerk go do it in the dev section.
Now you get a gold star and your little buddy too.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
KyJelly69 said:
Then why are being a trolling ass? This topic obviously has nothing to do with you. This is the HELP section. If you want to be a jerk go do it in the dev section.
Now you get a gold star and your little buddy too.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nobody is being a jerk.
How can you come in here and say we "need" a chart? That would be a great way for you to contribute...
Instead, you pop off to the people who gave you the ability to run said custom kernels in the first place.
Nice.
beaups said:
Nobody is being a jerk.
How can you come in here and say we "need" a chart? That would be a great way for you to contribute...
Instead, you pop off to the people who gave you the ability to run said custom kernels in the first place.
Nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You sure as hell aren't being very helpful in the help section. All you are doing is being a self-righteous ***** becuase you think i owe you something. That's what donatons are for. If you can't help the people that are asking for it in the help section then shut up and move on.
Saying "we need one" is just another way of asking if there is one. so, for clarity, is there a list of features comparing kernels? Maybe if I get a second between raising a family and curing cancer I'll teach myself github but as of now I don't know how. That's why I posted in the help section. At least I followed the rules and didn't ask in the dev section. Get over yourself.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
beaups said:
So make a chart then.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly I was thinking the same thing. Take to bull by the horns OP. Not trying to be an a$$ but we would all have to dig through the information only the developers would really know what the differences are. Do it man!
You just assume I have the time and technical ability to do so. And, I didn't ask anybody to make one, only that we need/is there one.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
FYI, I wrote a high level summary of the differences in my kernel thread.
crpalmer said:
FYI, I wrote a high level summary of the differences in my kernel thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for pointing that out, I had to read through several pages to find it. But I was thinking more of a chart showing who's kernel has which parts from other's kernels. In the end it will probably never happen so at least thank you for that.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
If you're going to post to the forums please keep it respectful with each other.
As others have mentioned everyone should have a link to their github or respective sources in their OPs. Just go there and spend a few minutes browsing their recent activity tabs to see what all they've changed. But, if for some reason they're not providing their source please report the thread for violating GPL.
Thread Closed.
Project Unity
MOD EDIT
Other CM-11 ROMS worth looking at...
Check out the @ocarinaz64 builds here : https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B02ZZ1GsXhMkQ1F6Z1hjR245c0U&usp=sharing
They aren't mine, and are slightly different of course, but to not make waves in the community I am linking to them because I support his work too.
I ran one of the latest builds before building my own ROM and everything and thought it was great. (used it to sync up to the repo actually lol)
Also I'm sure he'd appreciate any thanks you're willing to give. Everyone likes to know you are grateful for the work they do right?
Water Check.....
So this is to test the acceptance of this ROM BEFORE I upload it.
Please anyone who would like to see this ROM uploaded, say so here.
I have really crappy internet like I said and will not bother taking the time to upload this if nobody wants it in the first place, makes sense to me lol.
Interesting . . .
P.S. I think @ocarinaz64 has been posting updated layout builds in my CM11 thread.
LiquidSmokeX64 said:
So this is to test the acceptance of this ROM BEFORE I upload it.
Please anyone who would like to see this ROM uploaded, say so here.
I have really crappy internet like I said and will not bother taking the time to upload this if nobody wants it in the first place, makes sense to me lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm interested, count me in. Please upload.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I'm, not sure, I found it hard to find an updated CM11 here. I saw the one in Android Development but was way outdated.
So you know, I'm not trying to rip you off Captain_Throwback or anything like that here, i really thank you for your work, and having it available to build with.
Just trying to make something more easily available for everyone. And will include links to other versions like yours too if i have them, whatever make things easiest for everyone
Evolution_Freak said:
I'm interested, count me in. Please upload.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will upload the ROM an send you a PM with link for now. Till I see more people who want it, I will not post it and please don't share it publicly until that time.
LiquidSmokeX64 said:
I will upload the ROM an send you a PM with link for now. Till I see more people who want it, I will not post it and please don't share it publicly until that time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you, I look forward to checking it out.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I am interested. Please upload :good:
LiquidSmokeX64 said:
First I have to say thanks to Captain Throwback for his commits otherwise this wouldn't be possible.
Ok so, this is basically just Cyanogenmod 11, built from source, with the commits for after the new partition layout, firmware upgrade.
I will be updating semi-regularly, maybe not nightly but at least once a week if I see people downloading it. If popularity increases, I will be more active on updates, and possible small changes such as additional apps, build.prop mods, and that kind of stuff.
Note: I am one man, not a team of developers. With a crappy internet connection. I don't know a whole lot but have some skills, but have no idea how to add/remove features and whatnot. That's not my area of expertise, but would like to have a few good people to fill in the gaps to make this a really nice ROM in the end. I will try to take requests, if I can do it, I will. This is for everyone in this community, so help me help you and we all will be happy.
This is an all-in-one ROM. I had issues flashing certain gapps packages, resulting in weird issues such as no SMS, so it seemed smarter to cut the hunt out for everyone else who just wants it to work great out of the box so to speak, thereby I already added the minimum gapps for the ROM to run smoothly. And everything seems fine as is.
Also, I have removed Gallery2.apk & Browser.apk, and they have been replaced by CMGallery.apk (aka GalleryNext), and Chrome.apk.
The gallery switch was just to stick to using as much CM code as possible, and Chrome was because I couldn't get the AOSP Browser to work for some weird reason yet to reveal itself to me. But it does make this ROM unique in its own way.
This should be easily upgradeable (dirty). I tried to make it to where you should not have to clean flash after the first install, but nobody's perfect.
DO NOT UPDATE OFFICIALLY AFTER THIS!!! CYANOGENMOD INC HAS NOT INCORPORATED THE NEW COMMITS TO THE BUILD YET!!!
I ONLY KEEP THE UPDATER TO CHECK FOR NOTABLE CHANGES WORTH MAKING THE NEXT BUILD FOR!!!
OK so here is the link to the ROM : (Not Uploaded yet)
If you support my work, please at the very least hit the thanks button.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Captain_Throwback said:
Interesting . . .
P.S. I think @ocarinaz64 has been posting updated layout builds in my CM11 thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Captain is right. I have been posting my builds with the new layout. They are easily found in my signature. The only thing that I did to it was applied Captain's commits for the new HBOOTS / partition layout. As such, I didn't think it merited a post under the "Original Development" section. I was keeping it under "Android Development", where Captain had it started.
ocarinaz64 said:
Captain is right. I have been posting my builds with the new layout. They are easily found in my signature. The only thing that I did to it was applied Captain's commits for the new HBOOTS / partition layout. As such, I didn't think it merited a post under the "Original Development" section. I was keeping it under "Android Development", where Captain had it started.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok I added a link to your builds in the second post. That way you are getting looked at no matter what, cause honestly I used your 20140625 build and was very pleased.
LiquidSmokeX64 said:
I will upload the ROM an send you a PM with link for now. Till I see more people who want it, I will not post it and please don't share it publicly until that time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please do the same for me. Would love to try it out and give you my reviewal.
Sent from my EVO using XDA Free mobile app
jmkarnai01 said:
Please do the same for me. Would love to try it out and give you my reviewal.
Sent from my EVO using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will do. Same rules to it right now though. At this rate I'll open it up soon
nohllywd said:
I am interested. Please upload :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PM me and i will send you the link
Posting anyway...
I was about to say I will try it out
---------- Post added at 12:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:31 PM ----------
I'm guessing gapps is built in..
hondafreak513 said:
I was about to say I will try it out
---------- Post added at 12:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:31 PM ----------
I'm guessing gapps is built in..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No reason to guess; it's stated in the OP .
Captain_Throwback said:
No reason to guess; it's stated in the OP .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh yeah I read that the other day I just forgot about it
Finally got this flashed on my EVO. Very nice work! So far, everything is working as it should. I particularly like the gallery app. Thanks again!
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Evolution_Freak said:
Finally got this flashed on my EVO. Very nice work! So far, everything is working as it should. I particularly like the gallery app. Thanks again!
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're welcome. Glad you enjoy the gallery change. I figured it was something unique i haven't seen in any other CM-11 so far for some odd reason.
n920c Kernel kanghis khan made by me
Change log
oc uc
ov uv
lots of gov
crontab/cortex brian
gpu adapted s7 driver
compiled using linaro
i/o scheduler
based on stock
credits googy MOD EDIT: REMOVED DEROGATORY REMARKS
Thread closed - no download link
XDA:DevDB Information
KANGHIS KHAN KERNEL, Kernel for the Samsung Galaxy Note 5
Contributors
muffinsmuffy, Just me
Source Code: https://github.com/googyanas/GoogyMax-N5
Kernel Special Features: its the best man
Version Information
Status: Stable
Current Stable Version: v1
Created 2016-06-05
Last Updated 2016-06-05
Welcome back man. I hope this kernel lives up to the name of the other. Will flash ASAP. Thankyou!
Dude...enough. You're just making the note 5 section becoming cancer. You think UITA doesn't kang from other people? Everyone takes commits from other devs. This is called open source. Why even bother uploading the source to github if you're not willing to share them? That's just plain selfish. And it's not that googy didn't give credits or anything. He explicitly stated that credits goes to UITA. You people are just blind followers of UITA. Go hang around at that new forum and leave XDA. It's because of you people this section is becoming such a cancer. You all hate XDA and the mods so much why even bother coming back here.
Btw you might wanna read this thread. http://forum.xda-developers.com/note5/help/future-note5-development-t3375489
Sent from my SM-N9208 using XDA Labs
eushaun99 said:
Dude...enough. You're just making the note 5 section becoming cancer. You think UITA doesn't kang from other people? Everyone takes commits from other devs. This is called open source. Why even bother uploading the source to github if you're not willing to share them? That's just plain selfish. And it's not that googy didn't give credits or anything. He explicitly stated that credits goes to UITA. You people are just blind followers of UITA. Go hang around at that new forum and leave XDA. It's because of you people this section is becoming such a cancer. You all hate XDA and the mods so much why even bother coming back here.
Btw you might wanna read this thread. http://forum.xda-developers.com/note5/help/future-note5-development-t3375489
Sent from my SM-N9208 using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey mate im picking up from where he left of i don't see continued development as problem
eushaun99 said:
Dude...enough. You're just making the note 5 section becoming cancer. You think UITA doesn't kang from other people? Everyone takes commits from other devs. This is called open source. Why even bother uploading the source to github if you're not willing to share them? That's just plain selfish. And it's not that googy didn't give credits or anything. He explicitly stated that credits goes to UITA. You people are just blind followers of UITA. Go hang around at that new forum and leave XDA. It's because of you people this section is becoming such a cancer. You all hate XDA and the mods so much why even bother coming back here.
Btw you might wanna read this thread. http://forum.xda-developers.com/note5/help/future-note5-development-t3375489
Sent from my SM-N9208 using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what I understand "ramdisk is not open-source" and UITA never kang anything NOT open-source that was not already publicly shared or WITHOUT obtaining PERMISSION first. . . I am posting this kernel (which actually compiles) under the protection of GPL. You are quite welcome to use it as you see fit. Enjoy the freedom but other wise what you have said just contradicted itself
I hope you can get AOD working soon!
nishanta2006 said:
I hope you can get AOD working soon!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to worry bro im going through s7 drivers now
muffinsmuffy said:
From what I understand "ramdisk is not open-source" and UITA never kang anything NOT open-source that was not already publicly shared or WITHOUT obtaining PERMISSION first. . . I am posting this kernel (which actually compiles) under the protection of GPL. You are quite welcome to use it as you see fit. Enjoy the freedom but other wise what you have said just contradicted itself
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have something burning in you and I won't put oil on the fire. I'm being ZEN because I know I am on the right side with right respectful behaviour and chosen words toward everybody. I may be not high in the sky but I am simply on earth talking to you directly not INDIRECTLY !
That will be my last word to you, whatever comes from you. Good luck to you ...
eushaun99 said:
Dude...enough. You're just making the note 5 section becoming cancer. You think UITA doesn't kang from other people? Everyone takes commits from other devs. This is called open source. Why even bother uploading the source to github if you're not willing to share them? That's just plain selfish. And it's not that googy didn't give credits or anything. He explicitly stated that credits goes to UITA. You people are just blind followers of UITA. Go hang around at that new forum and leave XDA. It's because of you people this section is becoming such a cancer. You all hate XDA and the mods so much why even bother coming back here.
Btw you might wanna read this thread. http://forum.xda-developers.com/note5/help/future-note5-development-t3375489
Sent from my SM-N9208 using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This !