[Q] ICS, Acer E330, stock kernel doesn't want to cooperate - Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

i have searched and re-searched a lot of times for threads that talk about my same problem, but none of them is related to it in terms of phone, kernel or ROM, and they're all nearly 2 years old
in addition, i am new to this forum, so please don't shoot me
anyway here it is:
i've tried almost every existing method to get governors like smartassV2 and interactive (my favorites) to stick without reverting to ondemand, but none worked
i noticed this:
in the exact moment the screen is locked, something sets the governor to ondemand
in the exact moment the screen is UNlocked, the same thing (i guess) sets it to performance, then to ondemand
since i know a bit about intents and receivers, i can say this behavior is triggered by android.intent.action.SCREEN_OFF/ON intents, so there must be some system apk with a receiver for those which reacts and changes governor accordingly
right now i'm running a modded init.qcom.post_boot.sh that sets back the governor to a custom one (i.e. smartassV2) every 20 seconds, which is the only way i can get it to "stick", however i hate this method 'cause it implies there is a shell running in the background, thus stealing some (yet minimal) resources and battery, and the problem is still there
some info that might come in handy:
phone: Acer Liquid Glow E330
ROM: Glowing Liquid 1.5.2 (ICS)
kernel: Lupo's kernel V3
take a look at the logcat screenshot attached, i think i found something but i have no idea what to do
EDIT: if you can't read what's in the pic, it's saying something about a CpuGovernorService

how is it possible that nobody cares? i've given more info than anyone else on this problem people, experts, devs, anyone, say sumthin'

Maybe try tot set it with an app like trickster mod and set it on boot? Or try another ROM to see if its a system app. Sorry I dont really know the programming part..
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium HD app

i'll disable my script and give it a shot, however there is no other ROM, only two existing alternatives are stock (which only has crappy ondemand) and glowing liquid by vache
EDIT: didn't work dammit

UPDATE: by raising the log level to 7 in a custom boot.img i can now see PrintK saying this:
cpu_policy->user_policy.governor name interactive, str_governor = ondemand
update_cpufreq_governor cpufreq_update_policy return = 0
as a linux user, i know that PrintK is basically the kernel talking to the user/log daemon, so i am now asking help to kernel developers for any clues about it, and maybe how to change that parameter (or whatever it is) in the kernel to get rid of ondemand
as difficult as this can be to figure out, i'm sure that this would be the end to many headaches, so anyone who knows about how linux kernels work please help me find the solution to this thing

Alright, i give up, ain't no answers here
Somebody close/delete this goddamned thread, please
Sent from my scumbag cheap phone

SuicideFlasher said:
Alright, i give up, ain't no answers here
Somebody close/delete this goddamned thread, please
Sent from my scumbag cheap phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hello , i got the same E330 , stock rom but root and kernel LupoV3 , to set it at 1300 mhz and SmartassV2 , maybe try Android tuner , or some who got possibility to change CPU with screen on/off , i'll try to see ...
Vache did a release 1.6 of this Rom , and Acer too (Acer_AV044_E330_1.041.01_EMEA) you can found them at Acer-club.fr
tchao

Speedo.thc said:
hello , i got the same E330 , stock rom but root and kernel LupoV3 , i set 1300 mhz and SmartassV2 with nofrills CPU , it work well.
Vache did a release 1.6 of this Rom , and Acer too (Acer_AV044_E330_1.041.01_EMEA) you can found them at Acer-club.fr
tchao
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you look closely, it resets to ondemand every time the screen changes state
Sent from an utter FAIL phone
EDIT: the thing is, i do have a cpu tuner with wake/sleep profiles, i simply can't seem to have it doing its job
also i stick on stock kernel because the other ones have buffer problems with music, and i'm not sacrificing my flac files for
crappy mp3s

SuicideFlasher said:
If you look closely, it resets to ondemand every time the screen changes state
Sent from an utter FAIL phone
EDIT: the thing is, i do have a cpu tuner with wake/sleep profiles, i simply can't seem to have it doing its job
also i stick on stock kernel because the other ones have buffer problems with music, and i'm not sacrificing my flac files for
crappy mp3s
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is it this one ? "CPU tuner (Rooted phones)" on play store , i give it a chance yesterday and it looks to do the job, more than nofrill etc .... no easy to set fine but if i see the log file 'journal' it works , i come back to "smartassV2" (wich is "virtuel" gov settings) after wake up and at enter calls ...

Speedo.thc said:
is it this one ? "CPU tuner (Rooted phones)" on play store , i give it a chance yesterday and it looks to do the job, more than nofrill etc .... no easy to set fine but if i see the log file 'journal' it works , i come back to "smartassV2" (wich is "virtuel" gov settings) after wake up and at enter calls ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, just the setcpu implementation in rom toolbox. anyway i tried that "cpu tuner" and it kept forcing the governor to ondemand despite the "normal" mode being set to interactive (and yes, "normal" was the current setting)
Sent from an utter FAIL phone

Related

[Q] CPU Governor in UrukDroid vs SetCPU

Hey guys!
Wanted to bounce a question off of all of you,
I have Uruk 1.0 installed, with Urukconfig 1.1.0, I also have SetCPU installed.
I'm looking to find the 'best' config to optimize my CPU governing....
SetCPU seems to take longer to 'set' due to SU permissions, but 'runs' just fine after booting - the system is nice and snappy, but there seems to be some slight bugs in it.... sometimes it wipes my settings out of it, especially after a reboot, but it is intermittant.
CPUGovernor in Urukconfig works well no matter how I cut it, but I am unsure how to set the scaling of the CPU.
One thing I did notice, between the two governors, if I have them both 'running' SetCPU reports 'interactive' scaling, while urukconfig reports 'ondemand' scaling... I think they might not like playing nice with each other, but don't quote me on that.
Any suggestions or comments?
wokker666 said:
CPUGovernor in Urukconfig works well no matter how I cut it, but I am unsure how to set the scaling of the CPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I figured this out, go into /etc/uruk.conf and edit the cpugovernor file.
wokker666 said:
SetCPU seems to take longer to 'set' due to SU permissions, but 'runs' just fine after booting - the system is nice and snappy, but there seems to be some slight bugs in it.... sometimes it wipes my settings out of it, especially after a reboot, but it is intermittant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think I may have 'fixed' this problem (I'm not sure though, I really hope I'm not screwing things up...)
I went into /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq and edited cpuinfo_min_freq to my desired 600000 (default 300000) and rebooted.
There seems to be no issues, SetCPU is now keeping my settings.
EDIT: Even after setting the cpu speeds manually, even making them read only permissions, the system resets them on reboot, seems like a fix described in this thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1169625 may do the trick.
EDIT2 Between the script I wrote and killing SU to SetCPU, the system is no longer rewriting the cpu_min/max_freq - Thanks arpruss!
wokker666 said:
One thing I did notice, between the two governors, if I have them both 'running' SetCPU reports 'interactive' scaling, while urukconfig reports 'ondemand' scaling... I think they might not like playing nice with each other, but don't quote me on that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can say, with the changes I implemented editing both the cpugovernor and cpuinfo_min_freq files, my system is most definitly running in interactive mode, but urukconfig still reports the mode as 'ondemand' - pretty sure it's not reporting correctly.
Im still open to thoughts on this, I would really like to hear what some of the seniors around here have to say
Cool, great info. What did you change in the cpugovernor file? Have you tried to change the Max freq yet? I'd love to get uruk to 1.2
bug splat said:
Cool, great info. What did you change in the cpugovernor file? Have you tried to change the Max freq yet? I'd love to get uruk to 1.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I set my desired min / max cpu speeds, and set the governor to interactive mode (seems to be a bit peppier than ondemand)
Unfortunately the only way to overclock is a kernel capable of it, then setting everything appropriately. Uruk 0.7 has an OC kernel - try it out
wokker666 said:
I set my desired min / max cpu speeds, and set the governor to interactive mode (seems to be a bit peppier than ondemand)
Unfortunately the only way to overclock is a kernel capable of it, then setting everything appropriately. Uruk 0.7 has an OC kernel - try it out
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, gotcha.
Yeah, I was afraid you says 0.7 was the only way. I was hoping you found a way on 1.0. I used to be on 0.7 with OC and I might go back.

Voltage settings reset after reboot...

Long time lurker... so I've done a lot of reading on this, but haven't seen anyone have the same problem I'm having so I'm curious if anyone can offer any insight.
I'm using the glitch 11.1 kernel running cyanogen mod 7 build 10.
Any time I set my CPU and OC it changes the IO settings, the CPU governor, OR undervolt the dif cpu states, they ALL reset after a reboot.
I've tried the kernel wiper script, and I've edited the kernel zip with the added script posted in the Glitch thread that'll make the CPU governor stay set... nothing seems to work.
This has happened ever since I started using CM7. The only way I can get the CPU state to stay set is to use the built in CPU governor in the CYNMODSETTING Performance section... but that doesn't help me with the undervolt.
Can anyone offer any insight? Am I overlooking something here? ****s killing me lol
EDIT: BTW... I hit "APPLY CHANGES" and "Save as boot settings" of course... just in case you all were wondering.
Thank you for posting in the right section!
You are using the voltage control app correct?
I just tested this on my phone. I am running the low version of the kernel (lucky phone I guess) and after a reboot my settings are still the same.
Maybe it is the type of glitch kernel you are using?
Try one of the others he has in the link and see if that fixes it. Worth a shot.
I am also assuming your using the recommended voltage control or pimp my CPU correct?

setting the cpu/govener/voltages now we have DoomKernel :D

hi all
now we have the doomkernel we can finaly play with the setttins
started this thread so we all can share the setting and foor noobies like myself share them so other can do their bennefit with them
I tried all the three apps..
setcpu; works damn fast but cant realy set the govenor ( not that i can figure out lol) maby some1 can help, great ics-theme
nofrill; makes my phone go cracy with reboots...but has the new cool thing that you can watch the batt-use like cpuspy.
incredicontrole; nice app you can set cpu,govenor and the voltages. but seems to give a little lagg
all of these set min/max to 192 - 1728 (seems like the standaard doom made it run with his kernel.)
smartassv2
cfq if possible
dont know how it works with the voltages..do i set them all lower ore just a few?
maby some1 already figured it out and can share..
hopefully this way the thread of the kernel keeps at developing an here the how to aply
I was using SetCpu which I had purchased and was causing a restarts on smartassv2
Bummer.
yesterday i tried al 3 of them and decidet to stick with setcpu...but after deleting the other my setcpu forced on demand evry time and couldnt get it back to smartass ore smartassv2..
i think maby all these apps are storing some kinda settings in the rom itself wich keep interfeering with the settings,
will try a fresh flash an keep just 1 without triying the other....
tried all, use incredicontrol - for a balance of power and battery, the best combo is ondemand with noop

[KERNEL][v500][4.4.2] AIC Kernel [MAY-4-2014]

AIC Kernel​for LG G Pad 8.3 V500​
Compatible with v500 STOCK BASED LG 4.4.2 roms ONLY! The "gamma improvement only" is available for other ROM's in the installer
This was just a private build that seems to have gained some demand to help with the v500 gamma issue. I have been running it the past week and it seems stable enough to share to other v500 users. I'm not a developer, I build and update TWRP for the Nabi tablets, have shared a few windows bat files, have a VB.net app to automate various mods to the Nabi's, and a lot of research of nvflash/APX nand formatting for the Nabi's. My only previous kernel builds were for the HP Touchpad for private use, and my Ubuntu computer. Basically taking what real developers have done and trying to make it work for my own use.
EDIT 5/11/14: I put the gamma improvement fix in just a stock kernel with no other changes, and the changes to CM11 kernel. There are 2 CM kernel version depending on which LG ROM you installed CM over to deal with the dimming issue at boot. Those are available in the new all in one installer.
Disclaimer:
Experimental. Use this at your own risk.
Please Please Please make a full backup of your tablet.
Base:
The starting source is V50020B from LG
Compiled with arm-eabi-4.7
Added features:
Initial
Improved gamma. Using default linear LUT (from 1.8-2.0 to 2.2-2.3 on my screen)
Default overclock from 1.72 to 1.78Ghz (no voltage increase)
Default underclock to 162 Mhz
Sysfs Voltage Table added for undervolting
Allow GPU to manually increase freq from 400Mhz to 487Mhz
Add GPU boost to GPU on demand governor
Add Faux Display interface (gamma control seems broken)
Add NTFS support(untested)
Add SIO Scheduler
Add FIOPS Scheduler
Optimize memcopy, string and square root functions
Add Intelliactive Governor
Download:
BETA: http://nabtabhacks.com/downloads/AICbeta2.zip Very stable but haven't got enough feedback to make it official. See changes here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=54482330&postcount=229
Installer for all gamma improvement kernels, tested by numerous members(AIC, stock, and CM) http://nabtabhacks.com/downloads.htm
Installer AIC Kernel: http://nabtabhacks.com/downloads.htm
Uninstaller, returns to stock 20B: http://nabtabhacks.com/downloads.htm
Install:
Reboot to recovery(TWRP)
Make a backup, just do it
Install AIC_kernel_flashable.zip
Wipe caches/dalvik if you see fit
Reboot
Source:
AIC: https://github.com/aicjofs/android_kernel_lge_v500
Stock with gamma only: https://github.com/aicjofs/android_kernel_lge_v500_stock
CM: https://github.com/aicjofs/android_kernel_lge_v500_cm
Credits
I need to give some specific acknowledgement to "oubeichen" for sharing his kernel tree, and sharing of information. Also to id10terror's install script was the easiest to use as a template.
Woohoooo, Finally some gamma correction love. Flashing now
ROM: LG-V500_KOT49I.V50020B_US_Stock-BB-Rooted
Working much smoother with your kernel, thank you for sharing!
Tested it yesterday and it made a subtle but noticeable difference to whiteness and brightness. Thanks again
Sent from my LG-V500 using XDA Free mobile app
Am really eager to try! Thx a million times @op!
So only run this if you're on a stock ROM not cm?
Sent from my LG-V500 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
xyojimbox said:
So only run this if you're on a stock ROM not cm?
Sent from my LG-V500 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct
Sent from my LG-V500 using XDA Free mobile app
tested with LRS ROM (stock based ) , working perfectly!
many thanks!
Gamma has been corrected perfectly. Antutu benchmark increases from 24,631 to 25,669. Two minor issues: 1) a secure boot error message is displayed during every boot though the boot process is fine (signature issue?); the display is dimmer (about 20%) after sleep as compared to that immediately after boot (any workaround?)
Sent from my LG-V500 using Tapatalk
bloommax said:
Gamma has been corrected perfectly. Antutu benchmark increases from 24,631 to 25,669. Two minor issues: 1) a secure boot error message is displayed during every boot though the boot process is fine (signature issue?); the display is dimmer (about 20%) after sleep as compared to that immediately after boot (any workaround?)
Sent from my LG-V500 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice increase on Antutu.
Secure boot error is normal with any custom boot image. Are you saying it stays on the screen once the LG logo starts "shimmering"?
Do you have auto brightness or manual brightness?
I have seen a couple of patches that might address that. I will give them a look next time I build. I want to turn off a debug config that makes the modules larger, intelliactive governor tops out at 1.72 instead of 1.78 by default, add exfat, and look in to replacing mpdecsion, maybe row scheduler. When I do that I will look at the dimming.
Before I do the above I was looking at anykernel script as some people have asked if I could make this work for other ROM's other then stock ROM's.
So anyone else notice anything thats an issue? Gamma decent? Stable? Probably only 3 of you, haha but I still am curious.
aicjofs said:
Nice increase on Antutu.
Secure boot error is normal with any custom boot image. Are you saying it stays on the screen once the LG logo starts "shimmering"?
Do you have auto brightness or manual brightness?
I have seen a couple of patches that might address that. I will give them a look next time I build. I want to turn off a debug config that makes the modules larger, intelliactive governor tops out at 1.72 instead of 1.78 by default, add exfat, and look in to replacing mpdecsion, maybe row scheduler. When I do that I will look at the dimming.
Before I do the above I was looking at anykernel script as some people have asked if I could make this work for other ROM's other then stock ROM's.
So anyone else notice anything thats an issue? Gamma decent? Stable? Probably only 3 of you, haha but I still am curious.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is nice to see you doing some kernel development! Uploading your kernel to XDA will also allow you to keep track of how many users have downloaded your kernel. You may be surprised. I'm guessing more in the 75-150 range so far.
I have been using the kernel all day and it's working great! Thanks!
As I mentioned in the other thread that you first posted this I have been using Infected's build of SimKat and thus this would not have been compatible.
But curiosity got the better of me and so I restored my backup of the stock ROM to install this kernel and see if I too noticed a difference...
Now I'm torn between the obvious advantages of using the stock ROM with this kernel (many thanks for that) or to go back to the preferred SlimKat build of KK and then lose he differences that this kernel brings.
Talk about a rock and a hard place - lol
Many thanks again for the kernel and sharing it with us
sleekmason said:
It is nice to see you doing some kernel development! Uploading your kernel to XDA will also allow you to keep track of how many users have downloaded your kernel. You may be surprised. I'm guessing more in the 75-150 range so far.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you good sir! Without SleekAI the 510 users would just have to run stock
I didn't even think to look on Box.net. Says 69 so you were close. I need to swap it over to my NabTabHacks website, I could monitor it there.
vimesUK said:
As I mentioned in the other thread that you first posted this I have been using Infected's build of SimKat and thus this would not have been compatible.
But curiosity got the better of me and so I restored my backup of the stock ROM to install this kernel and see if I too noticed a difference...
Now I'm torn between the obvious advantages of using the stock ROM with this kernel (many thanks for that) or to go back to the preferred SlimKat build of KK and then lose he differences that this kernel brings.
Talk about a rock and a hard place - lol
Many thanks again for the kernel and sharing it with us
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I combed over the anykernel script today. It copies the ramdisk out of whatever ROM you are currently running and then inserts just the kernel then copies modules over. Nothing elaborate but slick in the fact that you don't have to go messing with the ramdisk each time a ROM has an update that effects the ramdisk. I was thinking of doing it manually which would be a huge time sink.
Where the problem could be though is kernel module functionality. Let's take CM for example, I'm not sure the DSP Sound would work if what I describe above was used. Also there is the mobicore modules for example that aren't in this kernel. Speaking of other ROM's another bug would be the screen dimming for those running 4.2.2 base. While changing to 4.4.2 should clear it up it's still not plug and play solution. It's weird I thought I had a good grasp on what was happening with the dimming. If you look at board-palman-display.c(V510 GPE) and board.awfi-display.c(V500) and look at the lm3532 backlight stuff, you can see that values for palman start ridiculous low ~3, where awfi starts at 133 or something I think. Palman uses linear mapping and awifi uses exponential mapping. When I swapped those values I got the screen dimming at boot too. Problem is all that get swapped when installing a ROM and bootimg, so thats not it, or at least not in entirety.
Who knows... I guess in short I might have something to put together for all ROM's but what it breaks is quite unknown.
aicjofs said:
Thank you good sir! Without SleekAI the 510 users would just have to run stock
I didn't even think to look on Box.net. Says 69 so you were close. I need to swap it over to my NabTabHacks website, I could monitor it there.
Well I combed over the anykernel script today. It copies the ramdisk out of whatever ROM you are currently running and then inserts just the kernel then copies modules over. Nothing elaborate but slick in the fact that you don't have to go messing with the ramdisk each time a ROM has an update that effects the ramdisk. I was thinking of doing it manually which would be a huge time sink.
Where the problem could be though is kernel module functionality. Let's take CM for example, I'm not sure the DSP Sound would work if what I describe above was used. Also there is the mobicore modules for example that aren't in this kernel. Speaking of other ROM's another bug would be the screen dimming for those running 4.2.2 base. While changing to 4.4.2 should clear it up it's still not plug and play solution. It's weird I thought I had a good grasp on what was happening with the dimming. If you look at board-palman-display.c(V510 GPE) and board.awfi-display.c(V500) and look at the lm3532 backlight stuff, you can see that values for palman start ridiculous low ~3, where awfi starts at 133 or something I think. Palman uses linear mapping and awifi uses exponential mapping. When I swapped those values I got the screen dimming at boot too. Problem is all that get swapped when installing a ROM and bootimg, so thats not it, or at least not in entirety.
Who knows... I guess in short I might have something to put together for all ROM's but what it breaks is quite unknown.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you looked at the install script I use for the 510? You have the ability to change ramdisk files on the fly using sed (easiest language I could find), by opening the device ramdisk, insert one liner, close ramdisk, combine into boot.IMG.
I have a couple of simple changes for allowing tethering, and values that I couldn't make without it! This part of it may work for you!
aicjofs said:
Nice increase on Antutu.
Secure boot error is normal with any custom boot image. Are you saying it stays on the screen once the LG logo starts "shimmering"?
Do you have auto brightness or manual brightness?
I have seen a couple of patches that might address that. I will give them a look next time I build. I want to turn off a debug config that makes the modules larger, intelliactive governor tops out at 1.72 instead of 1.78 by default, add exfat, and look in to replacing mpdecsion, maybe row scheduler. When I do that I will look at the dimming.
Before I do the above I was looking at anykernel script as some people have asked if I could make this work for other ROM's other then stock ROM's.
So anyone else notice anything thats an issue? Gamma decent? Stable? Probably only 3 of you, haha but I still am curious.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I kept auto brightness disabled. It does not work well for 4.4.2. You may replicate the brightness issue with the following procedure: 1) reboot the tablet; 2) when adjusting the brightness slider, you will find 0% is very (too) bright, and the entire range is high; 3) after sleeping and waking, the brightness is much dimmer, and the entire range from 0% to 100% is lower in brightness. It seems a procedure during wake modified the range of brightness settings.
Sent from my LG-V500 using Tapatalk
Run with stock kernel 20B. I will test urs by now
Well after having to do a complete reinstall due to another issue, I tried this kernel. Man I've only used it for a few hours but color me highly impressed :good: My gamma is almost perfect and it seems noticeably faster and smoother.
Really great job and thanks.
How is the battery life?
aicjofs said:
Thank you good sir! Without SleekAI the 510 users would just have to run stock
I didn't even think to look on Box.net. Says 69 so you were close. I need to swap it over to my NabTabHacks website, I could monitor it there.
Well I combed over the anykernel script today. It copies the ramdisk out of whatever ROM you are currently running and then inserts just the kernel then copies modules over. Nothing elaborate but slick in the fact that you don't have to go messing with the ramdisk each time a ROM has an update that effects the ramdisk. I was thinking of doing it manually which would be a huge time sink.
Where the problem could be though is kernel module functionality. Let's take CM for example, I'm not sure the DSP Sound would work if what I describe above was used. Also there is the mobicore modules for example that aren't in this kernel. Speaking of other ROM's another bug would be the screen dimming for those running 4.2.2 base. While changing to 4.4.2 should clear it up it's still not plug and play solution. It's weird I thought I had a good grasp on what was happening with the dimming. If you look at board-palman-display.c(V510 GPE) and board.awfi-display.c(V500) and look at the lm3532 backlight stuff, you can see that values for palman start ridiculous low ~3, where awfi starts at 133 or something I think. Palman uses linear mapping and awifi uses exponential mapping. When I swapped those values I got the screen dimming at boot too. Problem is all that get swapped when installing a ROM and bootimg, so thats not it, or at least not in entirety.
Who knows... I guess in short I might have something to put together for all ROM's but what it breaks is quite unknown.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In my ignorance I was not aware of what could implicate the brightness values and range on this tablet. Having only just bought it, and upgraded to KK right away, I was not aware of how JB performed, in that respect. Prior to your kernel I was using the Screen Adjuster app as a sort of fix to compensate for the comparative (to my other tablets and phones) lackluster screen performance of the tablet. With the SlimKat ROM I was experiencing, but might have overcome them, some dimming issues which I did not understand.
Since restoring the stock KK backup and using your modified kernel I no longer need the screen adjuster app and things do seem to have improved.

gov-tuner project VS L speed !!doubts about freq and difference of these 2 mods

hello to all, i noticed that my redmi note 3 pro KATE ( i am on globerom 8.1.1.0 stable) has the minimum clock for big cluster, setted at 883mhz , and little cluster 691mhz BUT i can select on kernel adiutor the min freq of 400/ 400 mhz.
QUESTION 1 about freq​Now i am with L speed app , and applied battery profile, but i don't understand why it does not automatically set the value to the MINIMUM POSSIBLE. Is there a reason?
Is there any CON to set the minimum cloto to cpu at 400mhz? i don't understand why xiaomi.eu and globerom modders did not set this freq to lowest possible, is it maube harmfull for the device?
should i have to set it by myself in kernel adiutor app? please help me to use this app, i just suppose i must apply 400mh setting, THEN choose to apply to boot ( there is a toggle).
What if i set at 400 and NOT toggle it?
QUESTION 2 about differences L speed and gov tuner flashable zip.​I am sorry to admit that i'm not such skilled into android development and i have difficulties to understand terms like init.d or script meanings.....
For what i know i found pre installedon globerom the gov-tuner project zip file, then i discovered that that optimizations to the GOVERNOR, are also incorporated in another app called L speed. so i uninstalled gov tuner in this way:
1) entered into console, and entered the letter to disable gov tuner. ok,
2)then rebooted into recovery and flashed the zip for uninstaller.
DELETED! and i can say with that mod my battery life was really good almost perfect.
then i installed L speed, but still being a nice app with lots of features and explanatiions for EACH of them, i just setted overall provile to BATTERY, and cheched some other tweaks....EXCLUDING THE ONES that are described as battery wasting.
Then i asked to officiial thread if i have to reboot to apply, they said no... but it's PREFERABLE. OK I REBOOT.
by now i have worse battery life ( much worse) and i can't understand why.
I tested with console if gov tuner is still present, but NO. so there shoudn't be any conflict at all
sorry....if this 2nd question is THE BIGGEST ONE, but i really need to read someone suggestion and a simple explanation to understand if it's better l speed or gov tuner to me.
L speed seems very much powerful and can mod much more things... but is it safe? maybe there are so much options and i choosed 1 or 2 too much, and now i see bad battery life. but it's nearly impossible what is the option that causes me this.
And last important thing.... is it the same thing to implement these script or optimizations at the boot (i think gov tuner do it so) or after the boot like do L speed? ( i noticed into app a setting to choose 10 seconds after boot to apply scripts, in fact i see after each boot a notification about these applied scritps)
Hello,
sorry I can only answer question 1 since I dont use Lspeed.
Set it to 400MhZ Dude!
Doesnt harm your device, its still not laggy or anything.
Set apply on boot option and you`ll be golden.
RN3 has awesome battery life just stock. If you want more, install skynet. (was on xda, moved to google+)
There is even a guide somewhere out there for setting it to 400Mhz.
Cheers mate

Categories

Resources