http://www.shopping.hp.com/en_US/ho...us/en/pc_cons/higher_asp/slatebook_x2/buynow8
Processor
NVIDIA® Tegra® 4 T40S with Intel HD Graphics (1.8 GHz, 1 MB L2 cache)
Graphics
Intel HD Graphics 4000
WTF?!!!
This is completely backwards. Usually Intel makes the CPU, and Nvidia supplies the GPU.
Why would Intel step in and be like, "No... no... Mr. Nvidia, you no make GPU. Intel make GPU."
WTF??!!!
Are most Android games even compatible with the HD 4000?
Related
The CPU in the atrix is Dual-core ARM Cortex-A9 CPU, so why i see ARMV7?
it's beacuse that the andorid 2.2 not support in dual core?
The atrix will use the dual core just in 2.3 andorid ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_Cortex-A9_MPCore
Cortex-A9 uses ARMv7.
I'm not sure Android 2.2 uses dual core but apps that use dual core can still use both cores even on 2.2. (AFAIK)
wtf???
wtf?? the nvidea already develop the other processors?
Tegra (Kal-El) series
Processor: Quad-core ARM Cortex-A9 MPCore, up to 1.5 GHz
Ultra Low Power CPU mode
40 nm by TSMC
Video output up to 2560x1600
NEON instruction sets from ARM
1080p H.264 High Profile video decode
12-Core Nvidia GPU with support for 3D stereo (12 unified shaders); about 5 times faster than Tegra 2[14]
To be released in the second half of 2011
[edit]Tegra (Wayne) series
Processor: Quad-core ARM Cortex-A15 MPCore ?
28 nm by TSMC ?
Improved GPU core: about 10 times faster than Tegra 2
To be released in 2012
[edit]Tegra (Logan) series
Processor: ARM ?
Improved GPU core: about 50 times faster than Tegra 2
To be released in 2013
[edit]Tegra (Stark) series
Processor: ARM ?
Improved GPU core: about 100 times faster than Tegra 2
To be released in 2014
thats ****ing nutz.....nvidea solt tegra 2 but of what I see they already have develop another processor ...nvidea don't realease the processor because they want do more money and a controled evolution......:S thats sucks...I want the last ARM power by tegra :'(
Every <THING> company that wants to survive is always working on the next-gen <THING> technology that is more advanced than their current <THING> technology.
Oh noes Toyota already has a new Prius for next year but wont sell it yet. And Apple already has a new MacBook but won't sell it yet. OMG coach has a new style bag and they are nit selling it yet.
Every company does this. Every company wants you to buy things now and then buy something else later. That is how companies make money.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Its a programmed obsolesency
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Asus told us that the original Transformer was dual core but its actually 1ghz for computing and 1ghz for graphics (which i guess is dual core but not in the way we all thought.).
Just hoping they dont pull something similar with the Prime...
jleewong said:
Asus told us that the original Transformer was dual core but its actually 1ghz for computing and 1ghz for graphics (which i guess is dual core but not in the way we all thought.).
Just hoping they dont pull something similar with the Prime...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Huh? Not sure where you're pulling your information from, but Tegra 2 consists of a dual-core CPU with each core at 1Ghz and ULP GeFoce GPU running at 333Mhz.
Technically speaking its 5 cores and a gpu.
The Tegra 3, which the Prime has, consists of a 4 1.4GHz CPU cores along with another low-power core. It also has a 12 core GPU.
The TF101, the original transformer, had a Tegra 2. The Tegra 2 had 2 1GHz CPU cores and a 333MHz GPU core.
http :// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_Tegra
I guess it really was dual core, awhile back when I first purchased a Viewsonic G-tablet (I've had every other tegra 2 tablet since) I read a review that said tegra 2 wasnt really dual core because it was using 1ghz for cpu and another 1ghz for gpu. But according to the tegra 2 wiki it really is dual core.
Still dont understand why my Archos 70 runs webpages and go launcher better, it only has a single core 1ghz cpu . Maybe it was honeycomb that made the tegra 2 seem slugish.
Tegra 3 has the 4 cores and that single companion core, so it should have no problems I hope, expecially when ICS hits.
jleewong said:
I guess it really was dual core, awhile back when I first purchased a Viewsonic G-tablet (I've had every other tegra 2 tablet since) I read a review that said tegra 2 wasnt really dual core because it was using 1ghz for cpu and another 1ghz for gpu. But according to the tegra 2 wiki it really is dual core.
Still dont understand why my Archos 70 runs webpages and go launcher better, it only has a single core 1ghz cpu . Maybe it was honeycomb that made the tegra 2 seem slugish.
Tegra 3 has the 4 cores and that single companion core, so it should have no problems I hope, expecially when ICS hits.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Tegra 2 is two ARM A9 chips @ 1.00Ghz (and later on, 1.2Ghz) CPU alongside an 8 core GeForce GPU.
The The Tegra 3 is a four ARM A9 chips @ 1.4GHz alongside a 12 core GeForce GPU + a 5th underclocked A9 for power-saving features.
xTRICKYxx said:
The Tegra 2 is two ARM A9 chips @ 1.00Ghz (and later on, 1.2Ghz) CPU alongside an 8 core GeForce GPU.
The The Tegra 3 is a four ARM A9 chips @ 1.4GHz alongside a 12 core GeForce GPU + a 5th underclocked A9 for power-saving features.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The The Tegra 3 is a four ARM A9 chips @ 1.3GHz (upto 1.4GHz in single core mode) alongside a 12 core GeForce GPU + a 5th underclocked A9 for power-saving features.
jleewong said:
Maybe it was honeycomb that made the tegra 2 seem slugish.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably. They made a mistake of not making the home screen hardware accelerated. It's supposed to be fixed in ICS.
Hi first post -
Do you think these system requirements are okay for a game?
Chipsets:
nVidia Tegra 2 (ULP GeForce GPU)
nVidia Tegra 3 (ULP GeForce GPU)
Texas Instruments OMAP 3 (PowerVR SGX530 GPU)
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (PowerVR SGX540 GPU)
Samsung Hummingbird Exynos 3110 (PowerVR SGX540 GPU)
Samsung Orion Exynos 4210 (ARM Mali GPU)
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 ([Qualcomm Adreno 200 GPU)
Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 ([Qualcomm Adreno 205 GPU)
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 ([Qualcomm Adreno 220 GPU)
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 ([Qualcomm Adreno 225 GPU)
Android OS versions:
API Level 14/15 and above - Android 4.0.xxx (Ice Cream Sandwich)
Android RAM:
512MB
Instead of specifying devices, we specify Chipset, Android version and Ram size.
Do you think we should make a manual installation for Android devices?
Is there/ or any other resources we should add for Android users, for our?
landsofammox said:
Hi first post -
Do you think these system requirements are okay for a game?
Chipsets:
nVidia Tegra 2 (ULP GeForce GPU)
nVidia Tegra 3 (ULP GeForce GPU)
Texas Instruments OMAP 3 (PowerVR SGX530 GPU)
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (PowerVR SGX540 GPU)
Samsung Hummingbird Exynos 3110 (PowerVR SGX540 GPU)
Samsung Orion Exynos 4210 (ARM Mali GPU)
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 ([Qualcomm Adreno 200 GPU)
Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 ([Qualcomm Adreno 205 GPU)
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 ([Qualcomm Adreno 220 GPU)
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 ([Qualcomm Adreno 225 GPU)
Android OS versions:
API Level 14/15 and above - Android 4.0.xxx (Ice Cream Sandwich)
Android RAM:
512MB
Instead of specifying devices, we specify Chipset, Android version and Ram size.
Do you think we should make a manual installation for Android devices?
Is there/ or any other resources we should add for Android users, for our?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No
hej2010 said:
No
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you be more specific rather than "NO" ?
Your system requirements would depend largely on your game. e.g. A simple 2D game would require much less hardware support than a multiplayer 3D game with heavy textures. So, basically any system that can run your game is OK.
You should definitely specify the screen resolutions (and maybe sizes) your game supports
roc_vader said:
Your system requirements would depend largely on your game. e.g. A simple 2D game would require much less hardware support than a multiplayer 3D game with heavy textures. So, basically any system that can run your game is OK.
You should definitely specify the screen resolutions (and maybe sizes) your game supports
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We are developing a 3d-based game.
The screen resolutions are:
- landscape - minimum 1000 x 750.
Should we specify anything else more ... ? :fingers-crossed:
I am planning to buy a mobile which has
1.5Ghz Quad core processor,
Chipset of MTK 6589T,
GPU PowerVR SGX544.
I wanna know games like Asphalt 7, Asphalt 8, Nova 3 can play smoothly in GPU PowerVR SGX544.
Thanks in advance
Can i play hd games in a mobile which has 1.5ghz quadcore processor and powervrsgx544
boardaaa said:
how about Xiaomi Red Rice Hongmi?Xiaomi Red Rice Hongmi MTK6589T Quad Core 1.5GHz MIUI V5 3G ... GHz Cortex A7 Processor, MediaTek MT6589T Chipset, PowerVR SGX544 GPU
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah,, but interested in buying micromax..
Can i play hd games in a mobile which has 1.5ghz quadcore processor and powervrsgx544
so mtk6582 is quad core 1.3ghz cortex a7 with mali [email protected] 450mhz should i phone with this processor and resolution of 854x400 perform well in high 3d games ex asphalt 8 nova 3 gta sa etc? i had mtk6589 phone it played DECENTLY with single powervr sgx544gpu only game that was unplayable was asphalt 8. should the mali 400 [email protected] 450mhz and slightly faster cpu be good for gaming?
ian619420 said:
so mtk6582 is quad core 1.3ghz cortex a7 with mali [email protected] 450mhz should i phone with this processor and resolution of 854x400 perform well in high 3d games ex asphalt 8 nova 3 gta sa etc? i had mtk6589 phone it played DECENTLY with single powervr sgx544gpu only game that was unplayable was asphalt 8. should the mali 400 [email protected] 450mhz and slightly faster cpu be good for gaming?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CPU MTK6582 with GPU MaliMP2 can run All your mentioned HD Games Smoothy......