I don't know about you guys but for me this update has made Chrome, which had already become very snappy, insanely fast. It opens up instantly, scrolling is as smooth as smooth can be, there's no input delay, and it can handle all of the simultaneous tabs you can throw at it.
Here's my Sunspider benchmark on my completely stock N10:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
No it doesn't
I agree it's faster than previous versions of Chrome, but still not as smooth as Dolphin. The difference in speed is minor but can be perceived.
Related
I have a problem with zooming in browser, as you can see on picture below. zoom problem appears only on some web pages. Is this normal behaviour for stock browser on ics, because on GB i did have any problems.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
I have never experinced that problem, so i would say - no - it's not normal. However my guess would be that the webpages are not quite build for mobile devices, contact the webmaster for clarification, or just to let them know it could be a problem.
Is Google Chrome limiting CPU speed on anyone else's devices? I noticed it seemed shower lately and sure enough, when in Chrome the cpu will not exceed 1242mhz.
In Chrome :
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Immediately after hitting home button :
Unlimited so that it's not constrained by screen resolution and can be compared for any phone, future and past.
This is my abnormally high score achieved by using much higher thermal limits and non-stock kernel settings.
Pure Nexus (6.0.0) and Kylo kernel R7.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Good morning
I have a problem with the instagram camera. Basically it all works just fine but when I try to zoom with it it lags a lot and that lag is seen In the video too. This happens even if I'm not recording. I have carbon from installed, do not remember if this problem was present with stock but it sure was when I had lineage, not too long ago.
It's frustrating because I see a friend with op5t, wich has the same chipset, and it all works fine. Is there an explanation different from "meh it's just badly optimized, suck it up" ? If so, can I fix it?
Thanks
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Looks like my One Plus 8 Pro has a similar single core score and better multi core score. I'm kind of disappointed as I would have thought it would have been much faster.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Bench marks are meaning less now days.
Unless you are a android gamer or saving the world with your device.
Strange that a 2 years old device out performs it or has simar results. Really debating if I should keep it now. I do save the world with my phone,