Related
Hello there,while working on OMFGB and CM6,I decided to take ICS CAF sources and build them since andy is working at AOSP,arjen is working at CM9 and now I'm working at CAF. I opened this since I can handle various projects at a time,infact I'm developing for other stuff also.
Current status: Fixing build errors
All d best little genius..
@Bytecode, maybe this small info can be helpful:
you need to change a lot of configs in CAF to build - its like the AOSP configs.
the most pro on this project is, its made for MSM devices, possible you can get more
things to function (if things are fixed by CAF) as in CM9 or AOSP ... good luck
Good luck bro!
OT: Mind I ask u why u changed ur name?
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
andy572 said:
@Bytecode, maybe this small info can be helpful:
you need to change a lot of configs in CAF to build - its like the AOSP configs.
the most pro on this project is, its made for MSM devices, possible you can get more
things to function (if things are fixed by CAF) as in CM9 or AOSP ... good luck
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So developing for AOSP is same configs **** to fix
One thing I always asked myself: There is no msm7227 manifest in every caf build,but there's msm7627a,which is basically the same. Doesnìt matter if i build msm7627a?
Keep doing your thing Bytecode. Maybe just make one board for everything. Then when all is final release them in individual posts.
mentalityx said:
Keep doing your thing Bytecode. Maybe just make one board for everything. Then when all is final release them in individual posts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right. But now i've already created them,so for the next time.
Bytecode said:
So developing for AOSP is same configs **** to fix
One thing I always asked myself: There is no msm7227 manifest in every caf build,but there's msm7627a,which is basically the same. Doesnìt matter if i build msm7627a?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont know, the hw specs are the same - at least the same cpu/gpu and memory.
maybe only another camera^^
Building now
sooo... any news here?
Bytecode said:
Building now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha ha little bytecode is going again
Enjoy your build procedure well be waiting
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
So... libskia is giving me ****:
make: *** No rule to make target "out/target/product/thunderg/obj/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libqc-skia_intermediates/libqc-skia.a", needed for per "out/target/product/thunderg/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/libskia_intermediates/LINKED/libskia.so". Stop.
(BTW: Used andy's device and vendor folder as well as his kernel).
Bytecode said:
So... libskia is giving me ****:
make: *** No rule to make target "out/target/product/thunderg/obj/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libqc-skia_intermediates/libqc-skia.a", needed for per "out/target/product/thunderg/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/libskia_intermediates/LINKED/libskia.so". Stop.
(BTW: Used andy's device and vendor folder as well as his kernel).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems like it's a missing file our a target file.
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Bytecode said:
So... libskia is giving me ****:
make: *** No rule to make target "out/target/product/thunderg/obj/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libqc-skia_intermediates/libqc-skia.a", needed for per "out/target/product/thunderg/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/libskia_intermediates/LINKED/libskia.so". Stop.
(BTW: Used andy's device and vendor folder as well as his kernel).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
edit the Android.mk and remove that lib, its proprietary **** only
SWEATTAIMI said:
Seems like it's a missing file our a target file.
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have that anymore
Wow,I can already smell CAF optimized code: Frameworks base is different for lots of stuff: Using AOSP andy's framework base was a bad idea: I'll check on his github what he changed on frameworks base.
@andy: Did you change stuff in framework base for making it boot or you did it later?
I guess he changed things for his Phoenix Android look
Also some fixes needed there for loading old adreno-drivers.
_Arjen_ said:
I guess he changed things for his Phoenix Android look
Also some fixes needed there for loading old adreno-drivers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm getting really,really confused here
Adding vendor and device folder from andy gives me libskia ****,adding all from andy gives me framework ****,I don't know what to do here
Lemme basically explain: What files are needed for building/booting CAF ICS succesfully? Don't post stuff necessary for fixing bugs later
Thank you
Just one little question, what branch did you use from framework_base?
You took the master-branch?
Guess you won't need the msm and qcom repo's, but need evereything else.
I can't remember I had problems related to skia during build, I have taken a look if I did change anything there, but I did not...
Don't have CAF-sources synced yet, so can't take a look what is going wrong.
Perhaps Lupohirp has them and can take a look.
Bytecode said:
I don't have that anymore
Wow,I can already smell CAF optimized code: Frameworks base is different for lots of stuff: Using AOSP andy's framework base was a bad idea: I'll check on his github what he changed on frameworks base.
@andy: Did you change stuff in framework base for making it boot or you did it later?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOSP is not CAF, AOSP is not CM - each framework has its own code, it
has nothing to do with my changes, as you can see in my patches, its nothing
to make it "feel me like a phoenix"
To help you a bit:
some makefile variables cant be used in CAF, CM or AOSP and vice versa,
you have to look in relevant config variables ad what its used for,
than look in the source code if the name has changed or the variable
cant be used (or what ever).
_Arjen_ said:
Just one little question, what branch did you use from framework_base?
You took the master-branch?
Guess you won't need the msm and qcom repo's, but need evereything else.
I can't remember I had problems related to skia during build, I have taken a look if I did change anything there, but I did not...
Don't have CAF-sources synced yet, so can't take a look what is going wrong.
Perhaps Lupohirp has them and can take a look.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
qcom repos are very needed to compile qcom related changes like audio/media.
I have made a build environment in VMWare. I have added all necessary programs to the Gnome menu. I spent a good 6 hours on making this and compressing this.
Before you use the VMWare image change RAM and CPU to your needings. I suggest at least 2GB RAM and 2 cores assigned for decent performance.
I have also enabled 3D acceleration for OpenGL developers or those who want to try making games.
Requirements
VMWare Player (FREE)
VMWare Workstation (optional, paid)
Features
- Everything is installed:
- Android SDK Tools
- Eclipse
- Android AOSP ready: tested with Jelly Bean
- CyanogenMod ready: tested with CyanogenMod 10 and later
- Developer links in Firefox to CyanogenMod and Android AOSP.
Downloads
One package
http://rapidgator.net/file/49386792/Android_Developer_Environment_1.7z.html
Splitted
http://rapidgator.net/file/49403760/Android_Developer_Environment_1.zip.001.html
http://rapidgator.net/file/49400833/Android_Developer_Environment_1.zip.002.html
FAQ
Can you upload on a mirror?
- No it takes too much time and bandwidth. I don't have the money to buy extra bandwidth.
Passwords?
- All passwords are: 'root'
Looks awesome! I just finished downloading it.. But whats the passwords? For the user anddev and root.
mattmannlt said:
Looks awesome! I just finished downloading it.. But whats the passwords? For the user anddev and root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would highly recommend each user and ESPECIALLY new users go through the process of setting up and configuring their own development environment. You will gain a lot of understanding on how Linux and thus Android operates by working with it yourself, and this really is important. This is great for a experienced dev who wants to have a backup of his own environment, but I think it's just adding one more crutch that the newbies really won't understand.
Password is 'root'
I thought this was a nice and obvious password to use. Sorry for letting you wait.
djjonastybe said:
Password is 'root'
I thought this was a nice and obvious password to use. Sorry for letting you wait.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
aa
---------- Post added at 08:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:01 AM ----------
Djj, was building cm10 in vmware are more stable then virtualbox? Tks
Sent from my LG-P990
orbital_71 said:
Djj, was building cm10 in vmware are more stable then virtualbox? Tks
Sent from my LG-P990
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Just about the same. I use virtual box .
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
lithid-cm said:
No. Just about the same. I use virtual box .
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lithid-cm, i am a beginner as i had install virtualbox with ubuntu 12.04 in it, but with 512m. I not rushing for building rom up just for mine knowledge and understand on building enviroment would that be fine? Tks
Sent from my LG-P990
orbital_71 said:
aa
---------- Post added at 08:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:01 AM ----------
Djj, was building cm10 in vmware are more stable then virtualbox? Tks
Sent from my LG-P990
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's much more stable using VMWare. Many systems have trouble downloading the source code. Virtual Box gets the 'HTTPS ... not received' errors. Honestly I don't know how to say the error accurately because I simply skipped Virtual Box due to that issue
djjonastybe said:
It's much more stable using VMWare. Many systems have trouble downloading the source code. Virtual Box gets the 'HTTPS ... not received' errors. Honestly I don't know how to say the error accurately because I simply skipped Virtual Box due to that issue
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Djj, here another question. i am a beginner if i set to only with 512m for vmware will that be fine as I not rushing for building rom up just for mine knowledge and understand on building enviroment would that be fine? Sorry can't download from rapidgator if u upload to mediafire u still have to pay? Tks
djjonastybe said:
It's much more stable using VMWare. Many systems have trouble downloading the source code. Virtual Box gets the 'HTTPS ... not received' errors. Honestly I don't know how to say the error accurately because I simply skipped Virtual Box due to that issue
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These issues are simple configuration mishaps and can be fixed easily. Nat tends to do this, I use a bridged nic. There are also a few kernel values you modify to fix any "download errors". I have never experienced any issues like you are suggesting using virtual box.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
orbital_71 said:
Lithid-cm, i am a beginner as i had install virtualbox with ubuntu 12.04 in it, but with 512m. I not rushing for building rom up just for mine knowledge and understand on building enviroment would that be fine? Tks
Sent from my LG-P990
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had issues building with less then 3 gig of memory. 512 might be too low. Might need at least 2 gig.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Those who want to install Sun Java JDK (Oracle) need to follow this tutorial:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=28793435#post28793435
Follow the Java part I made the guide some time ago
Kernel Source
Hi,
I'm new to android development.
I know that every ROM will have a Linux kernel, but where does this kernel come from?
I googled it, but I still can't figure it out.
I'll just take a wild guess.
Is it from
1. The source that you git from? (Ex: AOSP, CM10, AOKP)
2. The kernel of the Linux OS? (Ex: This VM's Linux kernel)
and by the way, am I able to change the kernel myself? (Ex: 2.6.35 to 3.0.8)
Thanks!
goldchang said:
Hi,
I'm new to android development.
I know that every ROM will have a Linux kernel, but where does this kernel come from?
I googled it, but I still can't figure it out.
I'll just take a wild guess.
Is it from
1. The source that you git from? (Ex: AOSP, CM10, AOKP)
2. The kernel of the Linux OS? (Ex: This VM's Linux kernel)
and by the way, am I able to change the kernel myself? (Ex: 2.6.35 to 3.0.8)
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You get the kernel source from your device manufacturer.
goldchang said:
Hi,
I'm new to android development.
I know that every ROM will have a Linux kernel, but where does this kernel come from?
I googled it, but I still can't figure it out.
I'll just take a wild guess.
Is it from
1. The source that you git from? (Ex: AOSP, CM10, AOKP)
2. The kernel of the Linux OS? (Ex: This VM's Linux kernel)
and by the way, am I able to change the kernel myself? (Ex: 2.6.35 to 3.0.8)
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lithid-cm said:
You get the kernel source from your device manufacturer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or port it from a similar device.
Will try this soom to decompile and compile the Settings.apk from Jelly Bean... Anyone any Tips? Please send me a PM.....
Hi,
can somebody else upload one package on a mirror or something ! because splitted ones are taking forever to download !
Thanks !
ShivangDave said:
Hi,
can somebody else upload one package on a mirror or something ! because splitted ones are taking forever to download !
Thanks !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't have a mirror, but why don't you just download a Linux ISO and set it up for yourself? Should be smaller downloads the whole way, everything will be up to date, and you'll get invaluable learning experience.:
thewadegeek said:
Don't have a mirror, but why don't you just download a Linux ISO and set it up for yourself? Should be smaller downloads the whole way, everything will be up to date, and you'll get invaluable learning experience.:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have tried to setup the environment but many packages are missing...
EDIT: Downloaded splitted ones... corrupted !
hey guys, im good java programmer but i dont have any idea about android
so i was wondering what are the benefits of learning android developments?
, will it be easy since i'm good java programmmer?
if that idea is good then what android books do you guys recommend for me?
Hi folks,
I just started to port UbuntuTouch for the Sony Xperia Z Ultra and I think I should have a *.zip ready for testing in 2 weeks.
Until then, I will use this thread as a scrap book to document all the troubles I run into, all the things that needed my special attention and fixes that are not that obvious. I hope there will be some fellas brave enough to test everything and report back or even to join me with the development.
Best regards,
Kalle
First Update:
I found that the Ubuntu Touch version that ist based on CyanogenMod was not updated to a more recent version. This means that I have to either look into AOSP or backport everything to CM-10.1. I think backporting is kinda stupid because newer we are writing new software to improve things. Sadly I don't have much experiance with AOSP so I will have to find out how everything works and what the differences to CyanogenMod are.
The good news is, that I'm catching up with the mailing list, which means I'll have a place to call for help.
Also I'm in the progress to start a git repo, but I'm unsure what I will need to add, maybe some common stuff from sony does not need to be changed.
So long,
Kalle
Update!
There is a new porting guide! See here
I already freed some space for it and ordered a bit more ram so after my exam next week, I'll pick this up/Start all over.
Hope you are as excited as I am,
Kalle
XDA:DevDB Information
Ubuntu Touch for Sony Xperia Z Ultra, ROM for the Sony Xperia Z Ultra
Contributors
KalleEatingBrain, Kohelet
ROM OS Version: 4.4.x KitKat
ROM Kernel: Linux 3.4.x
ROM Firmware Required: Unlocked Bootloader
Based On: AOSP
Version Information
Status: Testing
Created 2014-05-14
Last Updated 2015-02-24
freaking awesome!
freaking awesome!
i would like to test. maybe i can help with developing/porting
Thank you for your efforts. I will test if needed.
Sent from my C6806 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Great this would be awesome if you can make it happen. I'm here for testing if required.
Sent from my C6833 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
In also here for testing... Ubuntu Touch has intruiged me, I would love to try it out.
Thx... (thread bookmarked)
Sent from my C6833 using Tapatalk
I keep meaning to reply to this thread... Thanks for putting the effort in to get this working. If you want any hints/tips etc from my experience in getting slim and carbon built for the ZU just ask, I'll be willing to test aswell
iBuzman said:
Thx... (thread bookmarked)
Sent from my C6833 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Nice.ill be watching out everyday
Sent from my C6833 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
blueether said:
I keep meaning to reply to this thread... Thanks for putting the effort in to get this working. If you want any hints/tips etc from my experience in getting slim and carbon built for the ZU just ask, I'll be willing to test aswell
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool, thanks can you give me a hint on how to deal with new targets in Aosp? I mean setting up the files in a way "lunch" is able to find the right target.
Sent from my C6833 using XDA Free mobile app
vendersetup.sh file in vender/ might be what you are looking for?
have a gander at this http://www.kandroid.org/online-pdk/guide/build_new_device.html
How are you doing on this? I've just started working on this as well and am curious to know how far along you've gotten/what issues you've run into.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Free mobile app
So I've gotten the build to start, but I'm running into issues with libhybris:
ubuntu/hybris/compat/media/media_codec_layer.cpp:51:40: fatal error: gui/IGraphicBufferProducer.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make: *** [out/target/product/togari/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/libmedia_compat_layer_intermediates/media_codec_layer.o] Error
I'll post here once I've found a solution.
Kohelet said:
So I've gotten the build to start, but I'm running into issues with libhybris:
ubuntu/hybris/compat/media/media_codec_layer.cpp:51:40: fatal error: gui/IGraphicBufferProducer.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make: *** [out/target/product/togari/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/libmedia_compat_layer_intermediates/media_codec_layer.o] Error
I'll post here once I've found a solution.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, thats as far as I got, too. :-/ I tried removing all different libs or compiling different parts and leaving others out but I couldn't get any futher. Also I saw your post to the mailing list but it seems like you wont get a helpful reply either. As far a I could track this problem is the incompatibility of togari CM-11 and the ubuntu AOSP source tree. On xda-university there is a guide for porting from CM to AOSP which I will try but maybe you should take a look, too. Anyways: Great to see there is someone else except lazy me working on this.
Best regards,
Kalle
KalleEatingBrain said:
Yeah, thats as far as I got, too. :-/ I tried removing all different libs or compiling different parts and leaving others out but I couldn't get any futher. Also I saw your post to the mailing list but it seems like you wont get a helpful reply either. As far a I could track this problem is the incompatibility of togari CM-11 and the ubuntu AOSP source tree. On xda-university there is a guide for porting from CM to AOSP which I will try but maybe you should take a look, too. Anyways: Great to see there is someone else except lazy me working on this.
Best regards,
Kalle
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually got past the libhybris issue. The problem was that the porting guide is out of date. It's based on using cm-10.1 whereas the current source for Ubuntu is based on cm-11.0. So if you use 4.4.2 instead instead of 4.2.2 then it works. But there are so many other issues and the documentation for fixing them is so poor. I've kept a running list of problems I've come across and the solutions for them (it's below).
Also they dropped the whole UCM thing so you should be able to get sound working once you actually get a working build, but I couldn't get it to build. The error that is currently in my way has to do with "No rule to make target signapk.jar needed by com.qualcomm.location" or something or other. And I found nothing on how to solve that online.
At this point I've decided to take a short break from the whole thing because it's so frustrating.
Once I get motivated to work on it again, I'll probably start from scratch.
Issues List (I apologize for not being specific about the errors, I didn't write them down verbatim):
If you get an error about libelf you need to add CyanogenMod/android_external_elfutils to your local_manifests/roomservice.xml and also add external/elfutils under subdirs in build/core/main.mk
Don't forget to also add device/sony and vendor/sony to build/core/main.mk as well.
The build will complain about not having a rule to make android-boot.img. To fix you have to go to device/sony/fusion3-common/custombookimg.mk and change boot.img to android-boot.img. You need to make the same change in device/sony/rhine-common/custombootimg.mk
I got an error about android.hardware.bluetooth_le.xml. If you just restart the build it doesn't complain, but I didn't find a proper solution to that.
If you get the libhybris error you have the wrong version of the Ubuntu source. Make sure you're using 4.4.2 when you phablet-dev-botstrap. It should be phablet-dev-bootstrap --sources aosp --repo-branch phablet-4.4.2_r1 [target_directory]
You might get an error about a product_config.mk and how it's missing a makefile for togari. You have to make sure that in device/sony/togari Android.mk, cm.mk, full_togari.mk, and vendorsetup.sh PRODUCT_NAME is the same. I solved this by changing PRODUCT_NAME to cm_togari in all of them and then renamed full_togari.mk to cm_togari.mk
You might get an error like MODULE.TARGET.SHARED_LIBRARIES.libOmxCore already defined in hardware/qcom/media. You should have CyanogenMod/android_hardware_qcom_media-caf-new in your repo manifest with a path of android/qcom/media-caf-new so you can safely rm -rf the hardware/qcom/media directory to get past this error.
If you get an error about dtbToolCM, add /device/qcom/common/dtbtool to your subdirs in build/core/main.mk
You may get an error about mkbootimg, that's because Sony uses a different version of mkbootimg. The only option I found was to download it from the internet (Thanks DooMLorD!). Once you get that version edit device/sony/rhine-common/custombootimg.mk and replace $(MKBOOTIMG) with the path to your downloaded mkbootimg binary.
You might get an error about no rule to make target something/something/signapk.jar needed by something/something/com.qualcomm.location. I didn't find a solution to this error.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for that list, it's sure to help some one. I think I have had most of those errors in trying to get aosp to build.
Can I copy those errors to my [DEV]Random thoughts thread?
blueether said:
Thanks for that list, it's sure to help some one. I think I have had most of those errors in trying to get aosp to build.
Can I copy those errors to my [DEV]Random thoughts thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, feel free. I built CM for all my devices and regretted not keeping such a list when I did that. So now every time I work on a build I keep lists like that. Eventually, when I have a working build, I'll post a guide for how to build following the same steps I took.
Kohelet said:
Sure, feel free. I built CM for all my devices and regretted not keeping such a list when I did that. So now every time I work on a build I keep lists like that. Eventually, when I have a working build, I'll post a guide for how to build following the same steps I took.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeh carbon and slim were easy to build, and simple fixes. AOSP on the other hand I wish I had kept a build log
Ah nice, when I last checked CM-11.0 was not working with the 4.4.2r2 branch. I think I know how to fix the problem with the *.apk. Basically you have to remove all java dependencies from all the makefiles. I will look it up, so I can tell you what to grep for. Do you have a git repo we can work on, or should I add you to mine (which is just a fork of the CM-repos)? I will take a look at the sound in the next days. Thanks for you list!
Keep it up,
Kalle
Sent from my C6833 using XDA Free mobile app
KalleEatingBrain said:
Ah nice, when I last checked CM-11.0 was not working with the 4.4.2r2 branch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That could potentially be a major source of my problems. i wasn't aware of that.
I think I know how to fix the problem with the *.apk. Basically you have to remove all java dependencies from all the makefiles. I will look it up, so I can tell you what to grep for. Do you have a git repo we can work on, or should I add you to mine (which is just a fork of the CM-repos)? I will take a look at the sound in the next days. Thanks for you list!
Keep it up,
Kalle
Sent from my C6833 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All I have at the moment is a fork of the CM repos. Feel free to add me to your repo. My username on Github is Kohelet as well. I can start to look into removing java dependencies as well.
As for the sound, the mailing list made it appear as if it was a simple matter of running
Code:
$ sudo apt-add-repository ppa:ci-train-ppa-service/landing-018
$ sudo apt-get update
$ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
$ sudo apt-get install pulseaudio-module-droid
I could be wrong though.
This thread is NOT for general Q & A about using the kernel or configuring a specific version.
This thread IS for sharing source code or attempting to apply debugging to code changes.
In English: This is what a development thread really looks like. No downloads, No user manual.
Note to Mods: OT is welcome, so long as it is relevant to the kernel developer experience
Building the kernel 101:
A clean branch with only the build tools, ramdisks, and MacOS updates is at:
https://github.com/StarKissed/starkissed-kernel-trlte/tree/master
The stockish branch adds Linux patches, mainline updates, and SELinux mods
The deported branch is the customized version described in the OP feature list
You are going to need a few things, especially if building this kernel for MacOS.
GCC 4.7 (This is the version Samsung's documentation listed)
An updated mkbootimg (Must have DTS support)
A dtbtool (Included in the source, but only for Linux)
Insomnia (Not a requirement, but it will help you in the long run)
For MacOS, the tools are available from the following repositories:
https://github.com/StarKissed/android-toolchain-eabi-4.7
https://github.com/StarKissed/starkissed-build-tools
Let's jump ahead a moment for those of you who have built kernels and notice your boot.img is only around 11 MB while the versions you see listed here are all roughly 14 MB. This is where the new mkbootimg and dtbtool are necessary.
Attempting to retrieve the commandline arguments from the boot.img will not tell you one important piece:
Code:
./dtbtool -o dt.img -s 4096 -p ../scripts/dtc/ ../arch/arm/boot/dts/
chmod a+r dt.img
mkbootfs (ramdisk creation)
mkbootimg (mkbootimg params) --dt dt.img
This takes the DTSI that was built into a dtb as one of the first steps in the compile process and turns it into an image that is appended to the end of the boot.img. The dt.img just happens to be about 3 MB. (11 MB + 3 MB = 14 MB)
If you grabbed the original Samsung kernel source, you may notice that their default compile script directs the build to an "out" folder in the root of the kernel directory.
The obvious advantage to this is that their clean command runs into some errors, so the clean process is simply deleting the "out" folder and making a new one.
This doesn't work for a lot of the custom components you may want to add to your kernel, though. Some modifications, such as intelli-thermal, rely on a subdirectory that is referenced in the Makefile.
Building to this out folder will result in an error because it cannot find the output of that component, but building in the tree, or actual source, will also result in an error. The lesser of two evils is to fix in-tree builds.
Code:
Instructions for TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE in include/trace/define_trace.h say
"the path is relative to define_trace.h, not the file including it".
Fix in-tree compilation by making the path relative to define_trace.h.
What this means is that when you have a line that refers to the TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH or an include reference to a file that uses a relative location instead of a global, these need to be updated
The only two files that currently require updates in the stock source code are
Code:
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs_test.c
#include -> #include "../sd.h"
and
Code:
drivers/video/msm/mdss/mdss_mdp_trace.h
#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH . -> #define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH ../../drivers/video/msm/mdss/
If you want to be able to debug your kernel, you will need to enable last_kmsg.
Open up the arch/arm/configs/apq8084_sec_defconfig and add
Code:
CONFIG_SEC_DEBUG_NOCACHE_LOG_IN_LEVEL_LOW=y
CONFIG_PRINTK_PROCESS=y
CONFIG_SEC_DEBUG_LOW_LOG=y
More to come soon...
This is a great idea!
Looking fwd to seeing this thread take off...it will be very interesting for sure.
Sent from my SM-N910W8 using Tapatalk 2
@ktoonsez im back ready to play my man
@twistedumbrella my man i hope i dont become a ball buster on this thread but i have the 1st 2 questions on this thread:
1. How do you patch your kernels? (i use the p1 command.. is there another way?)
2. How did you manage to make the OC values show?
Disclaimer: I may have a lot of follow up questions
friedrich420 said:
@ktoonsez im back ready to play my man
@twistedumbrella my man i hope i dont become a ball buster on this thread but i have the 1st 2 questions on this thread:
1. How do you patch your kernels? (i use the p1 command.. is there another way?)
2. How did you manage to make the OC values show?
Disclaimer: I may have a lot of follow up questions
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use git am -3 so that any issue defaults to a merge then git mergetool to resolve it.
Switching the index in the dtsi that was modified was the only change to show it that I remember needing.
https://github.com/StarKissed/stark...mmit/695abe187620acf513b33237042925d60a99f0c1
friedrich420 said:
@ktoonsez im back ready to play my man
@twistedumbrella my man i hope i dont become a ball buster on this thread but i have the 1st 2 questions on this thread:
1. How do you patch your kernels? (i use the p1 command.. is there another way?)
2. How did you manage to make the OC values show?
Disclaimer: I may have a lot of follow up questions
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im back too.
ktoonsez said:
Im back too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
right on
any thoughts my man?
friedrich420 said:
right on
any thoughts my man?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im in the process of just starting over from the "F" source and looking for testers on INTL thread. I wish I didnt have to start over but looks like Im going to have to
ktoonsez said:
Im in the process of just starting over from the "F" source and looking for testers on INTL thread. I wish I didnt have to start over but looks like Im going to have to
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
we know for sure that your source without bfq works fine... now its a matter of figuring out what of all the additions from yesterday's source to today's source caused the bootloop..
friedrich420 said:
we know for sure that your source without bfq works fine... now its a matter of figuring out what of all the additions from yesterday's source to today's source caused the bootloop..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wonder if its any of the top 4 commits from here:
https://github.com/ktoonsez/KTNOTE4/commits/tw4.4?page=2
ktoonsez said:
I wonder if its any of the top 4 commits from here:
https://github.com/ktoonsez/KTNOTE4/commits/tw4.4?page=2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
give me a little bit of time and ill revert it manually and compile again the one i compiled in the afternoon (your morning)
I got lost in Freedom Wars for a bit. I need to figure out an issue with thermal then I'll be back
friedrich420 said:
give me a little bit of time and ill revert it manually and compile again the one i compiled in the afternoon (your morning)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is a test one starting all over again, just has OC and Voltage control:
http://ktoonsez.jonathanjsimon.com/note4/TW/KT-NOTE4-KK4.4-TW-N910-11.13.2014D.zip
ktoonsez said:
Here is a test one starting all over again, just has OC and Voltage control:
http://ktoonsez.jonathanjsimon.com/note4/TW/KT-NOTE4-KK4.4-TW-N910-11.13.2014D.zip
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately same bahavior my man..
friedrich420 said:
Unfortunately same bahavior my man..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, really? I just had 3 people boot up successfully, finally. You have the "F" or the "G"?
EDIT:
The guy I am testing with has the "G".
ktoonsez said:
LOL, really? I just had 3 people boot up successfully, finally. You have the "F" or the "G"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the F...
friedrich420 said:
the F...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just edited my post above, the guy that is answering me quick has the "G". Now Im really getting PISSED!!!!!!!!!! WTH!!
ktoonsez said:
Just edited my post above, the guy that is answering me quick has the "G". Now Im really getting PISSED!!!!!!!!!! WTH!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did anyone diff the ramdisk? If not, I can throw the two in git and see if anything lights up. I have the visual editor for Mac for exactly that.
ktoonsez said:
Just edited my post above, the guy that is answering me quick has the "G". Now Im really getting PISSED!!!!!!!!!! WTH!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this may or may not confuse you more...
i made a test git repository : https://github.com/friedrich420/Note4-AEL-Kernel2
all i did was cherry pick your oc and voltage control commits..
It booted im running it @2.99ghz right now and its fine...
Could it be that you need the F source my man?
twistedumbrella said:
Did anyone diff the ramdisk? If not, I can throw the two in git and see if anything lights up. I have the visual editor for Mac for exactly that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I started with stock N910F ramdisk in version "C", version "D" went back to my original universal ramdisk you can try the "C" and see if anything changes:
http://ktoonsez.jonathanjsimon.com/note4/TW/KT-NOTE4-KK4.4-TW-N910-11.13.2014C.zip
friedrich420 said:
this may or may not confuse you more...
i made a test git repository : https://github.com/friedrich420/Note4-AEL-Kernel2
all i did was cherry pick your oc and voltage control commits..
It booted im running it @2.99ghz right now and its fine...
Could it be that you need the F source my man?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is exactly what I just merged in so the "D" that wont boot for you is pretty much the same thing, lol. See what happens on the "C" version which is stock N910F ramdisk.
Hello there.
Here is device tree:
DOWNLOAD from My github.
It is in Alpha (developers) release as probably You will need to fix few errors by hand....but, anyway, someone must to start with something....
Kernel is in this moment not released by HTC, but We can do some things with prebuilt kernel.
PREPARATION:
Please, after You pull it inside cm-13 source, GET VENDOR FILES by cd into device/htc/htc_a51ul and
Code:
./extract-files.sh
(with connected phone in adb enabled mode)
Second, please comment out in BoardConfig.mk following line:
Code:
TW_THEME := pure4
and uncomment:
Code:
TW_THEME := portrait_hdpi
as I wasn't release yet pure4 design skin to github.
Third, if You cannot handle "BSP" (and it's about 99% that You can't ) comment out:
Code:
TARGET_USES_QCOM_BSP := true
and remove flag
Code:
-DQCOM_BSP
from COMMON_GLOBAL_CFLAGS
Then You are ready to build (until first error come)
PLEASE, don't take advantage with this if You really don't know how to handle errors as I will NOT help or respond on PM's regarding help about building this.
When something come up, will make post/and/or attach possible working image.
Cheers
EDIT1: dts is attached, so if someone like to play with kernel... Check it out. I will put changes to 64bit kernel on My github soon with this device tree.
EDIT2: kernel is updated. You can grab it on MY GITHUB
EDIT3: BoardConfig.mk is changed, so no need to change twrp skin and BSP (steps second and third).
Thank you, btw. great job!
Great beginning!
So, things changed... Kernel updated, device tree updated, read.me updated.
Please be free to pull Kernel and make changes so We can got it working. I was made first steps and don't have so much time to make all this together work but if few of dev's come aboard and take work, We can make it work soon.
So i am quite interested in this device, don't own it yet so @fergy would appriciate it, if you could push vendor (too much work to do it all manually, especially the makefile ).
Thanks.
List of vendor files are under my github device tree... When you extract files, makefile will be builded under vendor/htc/devicename
fergy said:
List of vendor files are under my github device tree... When you extract files, makefile will be builded under vendor/htc/devicename
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know that, but since i don't own the device i can't pull blobs using the script (obviously), so it would be awesome if you could create the vendor (run the script), git init and push
btw i remade the device tree based on the htc a5, looks much better now: https://github.com/Thecrazyskull/device_htc_a51ul
Thanks.
Thecrazyskull said:
I know that, but since i don't own the device i can't pull blobs using the script (obviously), so it would be awesome if you could create the vendor (run the script), git init and push
btw i remade the device tree based on the htc a5, looks much better now: https://github.com/Thecrazyskull/device_htc_a51ul
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://github.com/Skorupa123/vendor_htc_htc_a51ul
Recently I uploaded it, so, enjoy!
Skorupa123 said:
https://github.com/Skorupa123/vendor_htc_htc_a51ul
Recently I uploaded it, so, enjoy!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a damn lot!!!
@Thecrazyskull Do you make cyanogenmod?
@Thecrazyskull
I know that fergy aboneded our project.. But you.. Do you continue? Can i help you?
Dragonfail said:
@Thecrazyskull
I know that fergy aboneded our project.. But you.. Do you continue? Can i help you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I pretty much lost interest, especially since i dont want to develop without owning the device.
Thecrazyskull said:
I pretty much lost interest, especially since i dont want to develop without owning the device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can help you.. please.. continue...
Sent from my HTC Desire 820 using XDA Free mobile app
Dragonfail said:
I can help you.. please.. continue...
Sent from my HTC Desire 820 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its a pain for myself, and i don't wanna go through that so i won't be developing for this device anymore unless i can get my hands on one (very unlikely)
What is thts device tree not understanding
chitranjn_k said:
What is thts device tree not understanding
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is not really the place to ask...
chitranjn_k said:
What is thts device tree not understanding
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you don't understand it you don't need it.
Wysłano z Tapatalk / Sent with Tapatalk
Any idea about htc desire 826 dual sim i.e. a52_dtul device tree ?