[Q] Advice needed on next steps to take - Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

I recently returned an S3 gt-i9300 to Vodafone as it has died completely.
Vodafone returned it citing 'water damage'. On advice from the vodafone forum, I returned it to Samsung (I was stupid and honest explaining what vodafone had said the problem to be). Samsung have said the same 'water damage', I asked them to send me pictures of the water damage which I have attached to this post...as Samsung had told me that the warranty was void...I took it to a local repair shop who deals in fixing phones (a good one who offers no fix no fee). The repair shop said they saw no evidence of water damage, none of the moisture stips on the pcb have been triggered. I didn't get the phone wet, It was not dropped in water etc so I am now left with a brick of a phone and no idea how to move forward.
Looking at the pictures its easy to say yes water damage but look at the size of the damage? it's mm, my point is that the phone never got soaked etc... even samsung said their stance was that water damage can happen even by moisture in the air or sweat !!... so is it reasonable to refuse to repair a phone that cannot cope with moisture in the air ?
Please could I have some constructive advice ? I am happy to answer questions should you want to know any specific information.
I have wrote a letter to Samsung please see below.
Reference 4138232318 IMEI
Message *As you will see by the notes on your system, you returned a phone to me as it was no longer covered by your warranty due to _quotwater ingress_quot.
I have had the phone looked at by an independent repairer (you did say the warranty was no longer in effect so him opening it up should not affect anything).
Inside the phone all of the moisture strips are intact and not triggered and what you have photographed as evidence of water damage is in fact solder damage not _quotwater ingress_quot. There is no evidence of _quotwater ingress_quot on any other part of the phone. Additionally the _quotwater damage_quot you refer to is not near any point in which water would have been able to get in the phone. The _quotdamage_quot if that is what you can refer to it as is less than 1mm in diameter..... this is not evidence of this phone being submerged or come into contact with any quantity of water.
Your adviser told me that water damage can occur due to humidity or even sweat. I am not willing to accept that this phone cannot tolerate being in a humid environment and I can assure you that given our glorious weather lately and the fact I have not traveled abroad as I don''t have a passport.....How can this happen... unless Samsung are saying that I sweat too much to own an S3 ? I would be very careful how you answer that one.
Presently I am asking to put in a formal complaint which is the purpose of this email and I am requesting that you escalate this as per your procedures set for such circumstances. Failure to do so will result in me instigating procedures with the small claims court / trading standards.
As a satisfactory outcome I expect you to repair the phone, nothing more.
I await your prompt reply.
Nigel Courtney.

To me the pictures shows more of a corrosion on the board itself more than of a water damage. But I don't know... however I think you're better of buying a new phone instead of getting it repaired as repairing it is as costly (sometimes more costly) as to buying a new one.

SignetSphere said:
To me the pictures shows more of a corrosion on the board itself more than of a water damage. But I don't know... however I think you're better of buying a new phone instead of getting it repaired as repairing it is as costly (sometimes more costly) as to buying a new one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. Plus fixing the current issues doesn't mean future issues will be prevented.

Hi thanks for your feedback. I am trying to persuade Samsung that this should be done under warranty (with little success so far)... any tips??. I have already got a replacement - Xperia Z (funny enough water resistant !)
Any advice on how I should approach Samsung on it ?. I know the S III is a bit old hat now but it's a bloody good phone and I am damned if I am going to have to bin it...

Your initial return should be to the vendor .
If you want to use Samsung's limited 24 months warranty then different rules apply .
As you have already written to Samsung not much else you can do .
You are of course at liberty to take the vendor to court .
Not sure how you would fare taking the manufacturer to court as they never sold the goods and the Samsung warranty is not a point of sale warranty but an extra limited warranty .You are essentially saying that the phone is not fit for purpose and has a defect that was there from the start . Again its the vendors responsibility not Samsung's .
Personally i would be taking Trading Standards advice . Small claims court does not cost much and either you lose or you win or the other party does not bother and says have a repair and go away .

Related

[Q] i9100 Screen problem

I bought a galaxy s2 recently and the screen fails to register my touches suddenly.
Here the weird part, the screen is able to display everything perfectly.. but half of the screen doesnt register my touches.. left side not working, but right side is working..
so decided to send my phone for warranty and after a month, the distributor said that the LCD Socket is faulty due to the phone is pressed too hard.. they say it needs to replace the whole LCD Screen..
Is it possible to replace the LCD Socket only?
Why would you risk attempting to fix it yourself & voiding your warranty when you can get it fixed for nothing/properly under warranty ?
They are charging me myr700 for replacing the Lcd screen.. how is posible to damage the socket where the Lcd screen is perfectly fine? (no cracks no scratches no dents)
By right they should replace it for me without paying anything right?
Ahhhh. They're charging you. OK. I don't know what the warranty covers in your country or what your rights are with regard to same.
I know in Australia if my screen started to die like that after a month Samsung would be paying to replace the screen/the phone. At worst I'd end up paying postage to send the phone in to them.
It might well be worth your while/cheaper replacing it yourself in that case. Not sure if it's possible to replace just the socket, you may have to replace the whole screen. Plenty of tutorials to show you how to do this online, and you can get the screens from a plenty of places online as well (eBay might be a good start).
Thanks for the suggestion..
I searched internet for the i9100 LCD Socket but no results found.. I guess I have to replace the whole LCD Screen already.. ebay selling them around myr600+ also.. So is it better to DIY or pay a little bit more and letting the professionals to do it?
There are some doubts that I would love to ask you.. I always place the phone inside my jean's pocket and they said the pressure of jean's is high enough to cause damage to the phone's internals. Is that true? The jeans Im wearing is not very tight either..
I guess whether worth saving MYR 100 is worth it or not depends on how technically adept you are, I.E, do you think you can swap the screen out successfully based on having a look at the video tutorials that show you how to do it ? If you're in any doubt, you'd probably want to have it done professionally. I cracked the screen of my Nokia N958GB about two weeks after I got it a few yrs ago, ended up having it done professionally as the saving if I did it myself would have been similar to your situation now (I would have saved maybe $50-$60 AUD). I'm just not dexterous enough to do a job like that perfectly
I keep my SGS2 in my front jeans pocket when I wear them & haven't had a problem, tho I do have a fake leather flip case. I'd be surprised if the pressure from having them in a not tight jeans pocket would be enough to damage the phone, unless you put pressure on the phone while it was in your pocket maybe ?
Sounds like they're trying to weasel their way out of repairing it under warranty to me, but the problem is (which other people have found on here over the past few mths I've been visiting here) trying to prove that they should repair it under warranty which would probably cost you as much/more than the repair is worth to have an 'expert' (someone who works with small electronics) examine your phone & who is prepared to issue a report or similar saying it's definitely a fault with the phone & wasn't caused by you.
Tricky situation you're in man Maybe contact a consumer organisation in your country and ask for advice if they still refuse to repair it under warranty ?
Hope you get it sorted under warranty.
aqblood said:
Thanks for the suggestion..
I searched internet for the i9100 LCD Socket but no results found.. I guess I have to replace the whole LCD Screen already.. ebay selling them around myr600+ also.. So is it better to DIY or pay a little bit more and letting the professionals to do it?
There are some doubts that I would love to ask you.. I always place the phone inside my jean's pocket and they said the pressure of jean's is high enough to cause damage to the phone's internals. Is that true? The jeans Im wearing is not very tight either..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright, thanks a lot for the information. I think I better let them repair the phone because if I repair the phone myself, its pretty risky and i might even damage the phone further.
I will try to discuss/talk to the distributor and try to solve this under warranty. tqvm. appreciate that.
No probs Good luck with it. Let us know how you get on.
aqblood said:
Alright, thanks a lot for the information. I think I better let them repair the phone because if I repair the phone myself, its pretty risky and i might even damage the phone further.
I will try to discuss/talk to the distributor and try to solve this under warranty. tqvm. appreciate that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Asus RMA gone bad

Okay, so I sent my TF201 as well as the power cable in for an RMA because the shoddily designed power connector ended up mangling the receptacle on the tablet. I could charge the tablet only by plugging in the keyboard dock, and even then that's iffy.
It was over 2 weeks since I sent the tablet via UPS and they hadn't contacted me. I checked on the RMA site and it said this:
Waiting-[WF4] Wait for Customer Confirmation-Customer Induced Damage \Out-Of-Warranty
No emails or anything. I called Asus and the customer support guy, while polite, was clueless and couldn't help me. No explanation either, which the customer service guy parroted. He estimated the repair cost to be around $130. Screw that! I asked him to escalate the case, but from what I've read online, customer support from Asus is impotent.
Also, I just got off the phone with support guy number 3. Again, complete waste of my time. He wouldn't pass me off to a supervisor when I asked (twice).
Does anyone have any suggestions? What are my options at this point? What magic phrase do I need to use in order for Asus to actually honor their warranty?
This is definitely a make-or-break moment for Asus and my future business with them. I've got an Asus motherboard, an Asus monitor, and a tablet, but I will not hesitate to drop them and recommend others avoid them if this isn't resolved.
Warranty is not really too useful - this is the manufacturer assuring you that is specific things break in a specific period, they will replace them. What is much more powerful (potentially) is consumer protection legislation. Goods must be as described, fit for purpose, safe, etc.
Typical behaviour is to claim you broke 'it' by doing something silly (pulling the connector at a bad angle maybe). You need to demonstrate a design or manufacturing flaw.
In the UK, the claim is against the vendor, not the manufacturer.
You may be able to pursue legal action for a refund (less deduction for the time it was usable).
Likely, if you press hard enough (in writing, with traceability, not by phone), they will agree to some compromise. If no-one else has complained of the same problem, they will rightly assume you are pulling a fast one.
Contact head office in your country - noone else will have the authority to waive the repair fee.
tshoulihane said:
Warranty is not really too useful - this is the manufacturer assuring you that is specific things break in a specific period, they will replace them. What is much more powerful (potentially) is consumer protection legislation. Goods must be as described, fit for purpose, safe, etc.
Typical behaviour is to claim you broke 'it' by doing something silly (pulling the connector at a bad angle maybe). You need to demonstrate a design or manufacturing flaw.
In the UK, the claim is against the vendor, not the manufacturer.
You may be able to pursue legal action for a refund (less deduction for the time it was usable).
Likely, if you press hard enough (in writing, with traceability, not by phone), they will agree to some compromise. If no-one else has complained of the same problem, they will rightly assume you are pulling a fast one.
Contact head office in your country - noone else will have the authority to waive the repair fee.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry this isn't going to help but... why do you expect them to repair your device for free if it was damaged while plugging/unplugging? Did you yank it in some odd way and cause it to deform?
I too have noted that the back side of where it plugs in us more exposed than the front due to the angle/slope of the back plate at the edge. I worry something bad will happen if I yank on it. I am more careful because of this.
If you leave the gas nozzle in your car at a gas station and drive off you can't expect the dealer/manufacturer to warranty any damage to your vehicle AND you will most likely get billed by the station for the repair to their pump.
I'm sorry you are having the problem but I'm not seeing ASUS at fault here. You claim it broke due to shoddy design. I doubt it did so on its own and I am sure that is the way they see it too.
hx4700 Killer said:
Sorry this isn't going to help but... why do you expect them to repair your device for free if it was damaged while plugging/unplugging? Did you yank it in some odd way and cause it to deform?
I too have noted that the back side of where it plugs in us more exposed than the front due to the angle/slope of the back plate at the edge. I worry something bad will happen if I yank on it. I am more careful because of this.
If you leave the gas nozzle in your car at a gas station and drive off you can't expect the dealer/manufacturer to warranty any damage to your vehicle AND you will most likely get billed by the station for the repair to their pump.
I'm sorry you are having the problem but I'm not seeing ASUS at fault here. You claim it broke due to shoddy design. I doubt it did so on its own and I am sure that is the way they see it too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope. I treated that thing well. I noticed that the plug was not solidly built pretty early on into my ownership cycle, so I took care to make sure that when I plugged it in, the cord was nice and straight and the plug was gently put in. Obviously *something* must have caused the pins to be mangled but if it was because of a bump, that's shoddy product design, not carelessness on my part.
If it was a $20 repair I'd eat the bill, but they a.) haven't even gotten back to me why they believe it's my fault, b.) they haven't emailed me at all, I've done all of the reaching out to Asus, and c.) they say they're waiting for MY response even though no one at the call center can answer what response they're actually waiting for. The second guy I talked to just estimated that the bill would be "around $130".
I am willing to work with Asus on this, but they're not willing to work with me. See what I mean?
Where did you purchase the unit and how long ago? (These are actually rhetorical questions).
If your purchase was within the past 90 days and you paid with a credit card, you may be able to work with your credit card company and refuse the charges. Not that the retailer should necessarily eat the cost, but if you bought from Amazon, Target, etc., they probably have some sway with Asus. Make your pain their pain...
Hopefully you took pictures of the damage before sending it...
This is EXACTLY what I am going through right now with Asus.
My daughter's Prime boots to the ASUS screen and gets stuck there and will not turn off.
I called tech support and they walked me through several attempts to reset, said they thought it was a software issue and then gave me an RMA number. (BTW, I had also RMA'd my own Prime earlier this year due to GPS and wifi issues and it came back to me with a scratch on the lid. So my husband and I went over my daughter's tablet with a fine tooth comb before sending.) I shipped it in the box and packaging that Asus returned mine in.
I sent it 11/29 and they rec'd it 12/3. On 12/4, the RMA status said
Waiting-[WF4] Wait for Customer Confirmation-Customer Induced Damage \Out-Of-Warranty
No one contacted me. I called Asus on 3 separate occasions - each unable to tell me anything but promising to escalate. I rec'd no calls back.
On Dec 13th, we received an email from Megan Nesmith saying there is customer induced damage and an invoice for repairs. Attached were 2 close-up photos showing VERY OBVIOUS damage - a deep jagged crack in the front corner of the screen and additional damage where it looks like someone pried up the metal around the power button with a screw driver.
At this point, I spoke to a Kamar (sp) who said that I would receive a call by tomorrow evening once they investigate.
I am feeling as if they know my warranty is almost up (end of december) and are going to hold the tablet hostage- my word against theirs. I have done some research and have read similar stories about the Asus Texas repair facility. I don't know what to do if they come back and tell us there is nothing they can do and expect us to pay. I really feel taken advantage of. Anyone have advice for a situation like this?
What's interesting here is the lack of consistency
last week, I RMA'd my Unlocked prime for a sound issue, the issue was it just stopped working through both the speaker, and headphone jack. Asus honored the warranty and fixed it free of charge, I was expecting to get charged, but did not, in fact, it was a one day turnaround in Grapevine TX, my guess is they tested it, and just sent me a different prime, and its already on the way back, I should have it back tomorrow, its possible they may not have fixed it at all. I admit I am very nervous about it, I was told minimum of 10 days when I rma'd. I was very shocked when I checked the status, to make sure they had it logged in as received, and it said ready to ship, after 1 day, and repair status, was device repaired OK, let alone not being charged.I am very curious to see whether it come's back from Grapevine relocked, as I have read several peoples posts here XDA that after Rma the Tablets are relocked, and unlockable due to serial number removal
I even sent it in with a fresh install of Androwook 1.51.Asus didn't seem to have any issues with it being unlocked, at least with me, and I have never seen such a fast turn around on a RMA , EVER. My last Asus Rma took about 4 weeks on a Asus Rampage 4 extreme Motherboard
So why is there this kind of of consistency issues when RMA'ing. This should be pretty cut and dried
randalltroy said:
What's interesting here is the lack of consistency
last week, I RMA'd my Unlocked prime for a sound issue, the issue was it just stopped working through both the speaker, and headphone jack. Asus honored the warranty and fixed it free of charge, I was expecting to get charged, but did not, in fact, it was a one day turnaround in Grapevine TX, my guess is they tested it, and just sent me a different prime, and its already on the way back, I should have it back tomorrow, its possible they may not have fixed it at all. I admit I am very nervous about it, I was told minimum of 10 days when I rma'd. I was very shocked when I checked the status, to make sure they had it logged in as received, and it said ready to ship, after 1 day, and repair status, was device repaired OK, let alone not being charged.I am very curious to see whether it come's back from Grapevine relocked, as I have read several peoples posts here XDA that after Rma the Tablets are relocked, and unlockable due to serial number removal
I even sent it in with a fresh install of Androwook 1.51.Asus didn't seem to have any issues with it being unlocked, at least with me, and I have never seen such a fast turn around on a RMA , EVER. My last Asus Rma took about 4 weeks on a Asus Rampage 4 extreme Motherboard
So why is there this kind of of consistency issues when RMA'ing. This should be pretty cut and dried
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it has more to do with the repair depot. They arent actually owned by ASUS, rather Authorized by passing a series of tests/checks. Down the hall from me where I work we have a computer hardware repair department that is Dell, HP, Lenovo and possibly Gateway authorized.
So essentially you are dealing with a company with its own set of rules/standards who want to turn a profit and depending on their moral compass etc... you may get billed for a MOBO like I will in Texas if a flash goes wrong and I send it in VS Europe who will just reflash the ROM. Further other folks are having trouble with the call backs etc...
I think what would be most usefull is to compile a list of repair depots that are doing what so others can avoid using the ones they think will shaft them.
hx4700 Killer said:
I think it has more to do with the repair depot. They arent actually owned by ASUS, rather Authorized by passing a series of tests/checks. Down the hall from me where I work we have a computer hardware repair department that is Dell, HP, Lenovo and possibly Gateway authorized.
So essentially you are dealing with a company with its own set of rules/standards who want to turn a profit and depending on their moral compass etc... you may get billed for a MOBO like I will in Texas if a flash goes wrong and I send it in VS Europe who will just reflash the ROM. Further other folks are having trouble with the call backs etc...
I think what would be most usefull is to compile a list of repair depots that are doing what so others can avoid using the ones they think will shaft them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats nothing just time to let off some frustration. I'm an owner of an Asus Transformer infinity tablet and i pray to god I never have to RMA that. I had an asus Blu-ray Burner that died on me. I sent if for repairs on January 28th 2013. after a few weeks went by not hearing anything I checked online wasn't in a rush for it no inquiry was made I called them and they said the drive was mailed on the 15th of February. After not receiving the drive on the 29th I called back and they said that is weird their systems says it was mailed but did not have a tracking number. They would have to look into it and get back to me. Tuesday February 26th I called again speaking to 20 different reps at this point they finally just reissued another drive shipped on the 27th on February. After all this received the Drive today and its a dvd burner not a blu-ray burner wrong product. Freaking ridiculous. I swear on my grave treat your asus product like a god because their RMA department is crap!!! I just took screenshots and photos to prove they sent me a wrong product.
I've just about had it with RMA. My Transformer has been back and forth to ASUS for six months. It's a total of seven times and they still haven't fixed it. It originally went in for WiFi and gps issues. When it was returned I found grit under the digitizer and so it went back. They replaced the screen and mobo. When it came back there was a huge gap between the screen and the body. So, I sent it back again. They replaced the back panel and when it came back there was still a gap and there was damage to the seal around the screen. So, it went back again. This time they replaced the back again and on receiving it I found the gap was even larger and they had bent the body, forcing the screen in. So, again it went back and they replaced the back panel and screen. On return the gap was still there, the damage was still present on the "new" screen and the hadn't even locked the release catches. I compared the damage on the "new" screen with the photos I took for the previous RMA. Basically, they hadn't replaced the screen. They collected it again today and assure me it will be resolved. I really don't think it will. The technicians clearly don't care and lie about the parts they replace. I think they hope that if they just keep sending it back with some bull**** on the slip that one day I'll give up. I won't though. I spent a lot of money on it and I won't accept the repair centre damaging my property. The most ridiculous part is that they have now spent more on postage than I paid for it. I can think of an easier resolution for this, that's far more cost effective.
Sent from my HTC Sensation using Tapatalk 2
I sent my Prime to RMA, took 1 week.
1. Wifi improved by 1 Bar
2. I GOT YELLOW TINTED SCREEN!
They replaced my touch panel due to flex. Yes RMA has improved my prime but gave me an icky yellow tint. Oh gosh.
Hi,
I'm living in France and i've just found a brocker who want to sell a lot of tablets here
Code:
leboncoin.fr/informatique/497860592.htm?ca=7_s
This is a french company, and i didn't know it. It's near Paris.This company seems to be regular according; the "who we are page" on its website :
Code:
lesoldeur.fr/content/4-qui-sommes-nous
I think this could be a good opportunity for people having a hard-bricked device getting a motherboard. However the seller want too sell the lot, only. If many further people ask for a tablet, he's able to sell all the lot in a short time, this could be interesting for him!
I think too this will be interesting only for people leaving in France maybe on a European country and able speaking french, don't forgot the custom's fee's outside europe!
What do you think?
Note : NO WAY for me buying the whole lot and selling it to each people who need it!

Dropped by GS3, cracked the screen

Dropped my GS3, cracked the screen.
Few weeks later and the battery would take nearly 5 hours to charge from a few % to full.
Took it into my local 3 UK Store for the screen to be refurbished, and as an aside let them know of the charging problems. NO OTHER PROBLEMS WERE APPARENT...AT ALL!
I was quoted the generic £75 to fix the phone, which will be added to my monthly bill.
However, on Monday (4/3) i received a letter stating that they can't fix the phone due to "water damage".
Now i can categorically state that at no point has my GS3 been submerged in water or been out in the rain - in fact the only "water" it could have come into contact with is the sweat from my hands!
Anyway, i went to the store this morning and they gave me an email they had received from their Repair Centre stating that the Main board had failed its RF tests.
As a result of this, the guy said that the phone will only get fixed under my insurance.
I grudge claiming on insurance if the fault was not down to me, although if i have to, i will.
Anybody have any advice?
CShock said:
Dropped my GS3, cracked the screen.
Few weeks later and the battery would take nearly 5 hours to charge from a few % to full.
Took it into my local 3 UK Store for the screen to be refurbished, and as an aside let them know of the charging problems. NO OTHER PROBLEMS WERE APPARENT...AT ALL!
I was quoted the generic £75 to fix the phone, which will be added to my monthly bill.
However, on Monday (4/3) i received a letter stating that they can't fix the phone due to "water damage".
Now i can categorically state that at no point has my GS3 been submerged in water or been out in the rain - in fact the only "water" it could have come into contact with is the sweat from my hands!
Anyway, i went to the store this morning and they gave me an email they had received from their Repair Centre stating that the Main board had failed its RF tests.
As a result of this, the guy said that the phone will only get fixed under my insurance.
I grudge claiming on insurance if the fault was not down to me, although if i have to, i will.
Anybody have any advice?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Multiple forum posts on Water Damage across multiple user forums and multiple phone models .
Essence is that if the water damage indicators inside the phone are on then warranty is refused .
Water may be condensation rather than actual water ingress .
If you want to challenge the decision you would need a engineers report proving that no damage has incurred from water . Yet to read of anyone actually going down that route .
Worth a look at 3UK forum if they have one .
jje

[Q] Confirmation of water damage - where to next?

I'm absolutely certain this phone has not come into direct contact with water, yet was rejected warranty due to 'water damage'. I received a letter with the following:
"Unit has been assessed as Beyond Economical Repair (BER) due to liquid damage found on main PBA and LCD. Warranty has been rejected. Unit returned with photocopy attached for your reference.
An electronic image has been taken of the damage to your device and can be furnished upon request. This device does not meet warranty criteria and as such any subsequent submitted repairs may attract a handling fee."
Attached were the following images:
[EDIT] I can't post links, instead they are attached below.
First of all, can anyone confirm this is water damage? I assumed they would have attached a picture of the tab that turns pink when in contact with water, but it wasn't included.
If it is water damage, how much would the main PBA and LCD cost individually and what sort of experience would be needed to install these? Any further steps required after they are in the phone, as far as software installation, tweaking settings, etc?
One last thing, the phone was returned in worse condition (cracked housing), than I had sent it in. Do you think they are liable for this damage?
Ryzaar said:
I'm absolutely certain this phone has not come into direct contact with water, yet was rejected warranty due to 'water damage'. I received a letter with the following:
"Unit has been assessed as Beyond Economical Repair (BER) due to liquid damage found on main PBA and LCD. Warranty has been rejected. Unit returned with photocopy attached for your reference.
An electronic image has been taken of the damage to your device and can be furnished upon request. This device does not meet warranty criteria and as such any subsequent submitted repairs may attract a handling fee."
Attached were the following images:
[EDIT] I can't post links, instead they are attached below.
First of all, can anyone confirm this is water damage? I assumed they would have attached a picture of the tab that turns pink when in contact with water, but it wasn't included.
If it is water damage, how much would the main PBA and LCD cost individually and what sort of experience would be needed to install these? Any further steps required after they are in the phone, as far as software installation, tweaking settings, etc?
One last thing, the phone was returned in worse condition (cracked housing), than I had sent it in. Do you think they are liable for this damage?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most definitely you should raise hell about the cracked housing. That's about as unprofessional as it gets - imagine taking your car in for engine work and it comes back with the paint scratched. Was this from Samsung proper or a Samsung-authorized third party service center? To me, it would raise issues about their credibility if they can't even manage to disassemble/reassemble a phone without damaging it, and then not mention it.
Sorry I can't help you with your first two questions.
You could get the boards you need from a 'donor' phone with a broken screen & swap them out yourself or pay a local mobile repair shop to do it, you can buy the screens/digitisers online (eBay/Google search). Cost will vary wildly depending on how much someone wants for their busted phone, Samsung do not sell these parts separately (not the boards/at least not 'officially'), and service centres won't even sell you the parts without them performing the labour to replace (If they did, Samsung would go postal).
As to challenging them on the water damage issue, you could pay someone to assess it & give you a report on it if they disagree that it is water damage, but that's going to cost you money (How much, who knows ?).
You could also contact the equivalent of consumer affairs in your country & see if they'll lean on them. And with respect (and I really do mean that), we have your word re: damage to the housing Vs theirs.
It all boils down to their word/opinion Vs yours, and to go down the legal route would be seriously expensive if you lose (not to mention the time/grief involved). Besides, given your phone doesn't even work, the damage to the housing is the least of your problems (A bit of perspective is a beautiful thing).
In all honesty & given the probable expense/time involved getting someone independent to issue a report arguing the point (assuming said person does argue with their assessment that the phone is water damaged), you're probably better off getting the boards you need as above & either fixing it yourself or paying someone to do it. Or getting a new phone.
Edit - In my non professional opinion (I don't fix phones for a living, I'm simply someone who enjoys messing with them, like most people here), based on the pics you've provided, the boards have clearly been exposed to some kind/source of moisture (you can see the corrosion). As to what that is, hard to say & pretty much irrelevant.
True, you have a tough nut to crack.
Notice that all messed up areas suggest that it was all you while using the device, if it did come in contact with water or moist, it was during your watch, regardless on how exactly did that happen.
That being said, you might not have a strong case. Should follow the donor phone spares advice.
Sent from the little guy
gastonw said:
Should follow the donor phone spares advice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bummer, looks like I'll be doing just that!
Thanks for the replies everyone, I'm glad I can at least confirm the damage was water, not a blatant lie to rip me off.
It could be moisture as well....dont facebook while in the sauna!
Sent from the little guy

Galaxy S3 sudden death and Samsung not honouring warranty

My Galaxy S3 phone died just after about 6 months of use. I have heard a lot of it, it is due to a MMC bug destroying the motherboards. When I sent the phone to Samsung they falsely claim it for water damage. They did not show any pictures etc as evidence. It has never been exposed to or immeresed in water or any liquid. I did open the phone "after" the warranty claim was rejected and Samsung's official appointed repairers certified it beyond repair and void of warranty, and surprise surprise all the water damage indicators are intact with the phone being bone dry with out any presence of any liquid or any damage to the motherboard. When I sent the pictures to Samsung they have replied that now I have voided the waranty again as I have opened it myself and I am not a authorised repairer. No mention to the evidence I had presented including the intact water damage indicators.
They even added to line to say we hope you continue to buy Samdung products :laugh:
I am planning to take them to court. If any of you users in the UK had any similar issues and any experience with taking them (or any mobile manufacturer) to court I'd appriciate if you reply and share your experience. Even if you are in the same boat not sure what to do, reply. The more the evidence they are using this trick the better.
I think I have a strong case. Esp as the last time Samsung were in court they lost a billion dollars.:laugh:
SAMDUNG SHOULD TRY MARS EXPLORATION THEIR ENGINEERS WILL FIND EVIDENCE OF WATER ON MARS IN NO TIME
Plenty of these sort of water damaged posts on the net .
You can get an engineers report and take Samsung to the small claims court in the UK re water damage .
How you would get on after you unauthorized repairer dismantled the phone i would not like to say .
The ones i am aware of have not proceeded and basically did not even bother with an engineers report .
UK it is the vendor that the 12 months SOGA warranty applies Samsungs 24 month warranty is an extra limited warranty .
jje

Categories

Resources