SGP 5.0 + PAC latest nightly - Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0, 5.0

Hi,
I'm not sure if this is the right forum or not but I've been using the PAC MAN rom nightlies now for some time now until the recent update on the 14-15th when I got stuck in a bootloop and had to revert back to the 10-09 nightly. after doing a lot of research I found that the reason for this seems to be an issue with the overall update to jb 4.3.1 and there is a kernel side fix that needs to be done.
basically what I'm asking is if there is anything I can do on my end to resolve this or if I have to wait for someone who develops kernels for the US variant of my device to fix it on their end?
I'm using the SGP 5.0 US (non physical button variant) with sultan kernel v6b2 and pac 10-09-2013 nightly currently if any of this info helps at all.

luraziel said:
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is the right forum or not but I've been using the PAC MAN rom nightlies now for some time now until the recent update on the 14-15th when I got stuck in a bootloop and had to revert back to the 10-09 nightly. after doing a lot of research I found that the reason for this seems to be an issue with the overall update to jb 4.3.1 and there is a kernel side fix that needs to be done.
basically what I'm asking is if there is anything I can do on my end to resolve this or if I have to wait for someone who develops kernels for the US variant of my device to fix it on their end?
I'm using the SGP 5.0 US (non physical button variant) with sultan kernel v6b2 and pac 10-09-2013 nightly currently if any of this info helps at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So far I don't think you can do something at the moment to fix this. Are you using sultan perhaps? If so then he have to fix his kernel so it can work with pac again.

zaclimon said:
So far I don't think you can do something at the moment to fix this. Are you using sultan perhaps? If so then he have to fix his kernel so it can work with pac again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah I'm running the latest sultan kernel for US players. I've recently been looking into how to build my own kernel also. figuring maybe there would be a way to update either an existing one or making one of my own (although I doubt I could make one as good or better then those out there right now lol)
either way I went back to gingerbread for the time being with the ACkernel that works for it until a kernel can be updated/modded/whatever...
just out of curiosity though. do you know what aspects of the kernel I would have to edit to allow for 4.3.1?

luraziel said:
yeah I'm running the latest sultan kernel for US players. I've recently been looking into how to build my own kernel also. figuring maybe there would be a way to update either an existing one or making one of my own (although I doubt I could make one as good or better then those out there right now lol)
either way I went back to gingerbread for the time being with the ACkernel that works for it until a kernel can be updated/modded/whatever...
just out of curiosity though. do you know what aspects of the kernel I would have to edit to allow for 4.3.1?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well the pac team modified some thing concerning the init.rc so the custom kernels would need to incorporate it. However, the stock kernel within the build should work no problem as its most likely nightlies.
Envoyé depuis mon Nexus 7 avec Tapatalk 4

zaclimon said:
Well the pac team modified some thing concerning the init.rc so the custom kernels would need to incorporate it. However, the stock kernel within the build should work no problem as its most likely nightlies.
Envoyé depuis mon Nexus 7 avec Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I looked into the kernel that the nightlies provide but they are all international versions of the device, and currently the Us rom they offer is an older version from back in September.
I'll look into the init.rc file though. hopefully it wont be too difficult. looking at some basic code for kernels and stuff it doesn't seem like it will be much harder to understand than the LUA was for making wow add-ons

Related

[rom][gsm] cm 10.1 official

Maybe is it real now?
I owuld appreciate to test it, but I don't know how, if it like AOKP or something like that.
http://get.cm/?device=umts_spyder
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Umts_spyder_Info
sound great!
but i think it just like the official AOKP
even though we have a good news again!
yyh2503 said:
sound great!
but i think it just like the official AOKP
even though we have a good news again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortnatly, I've tried to flash just like AOKP but it stucks in "booting..." (with the android and engines in the background)
I've not tried in slot 1, I'm little affraid installing into slot 1 and brick or something else
Sv: [rom][gsm] cm 10.1 official
There is already a thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2028020
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
guibovo said:
Maybe is it real now?
I owuld appreciate to test it, but I don't know how, if it like AOKP or something like that.
http://get.cm/?device=umts_spyder
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Umts_spyder_Info
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is because of Hashcode's hard work and extraordinary amount of input into the Unofficial CM10.1, I am sure he will make a new post himself. I dont think you meant to steal his glory tho.
BlueEditionE6 said:
This is because of Hashcode's hard work and extraordinary amount of input into the Unofficial CM10.1, I am sure he will make a new post himself. I dont think you meant to steal his glory tho.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uuh, sorry, I really did not see his post. ;$
My apologizes.
guibovo said:
Unfortnatly, I've tried to flash just like AOKP but it stucks in "booting..." (with the android and engines in the background)
I've not tried in slot 1, I'm little affraid installing into slot 1 and brick or something else
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you must be on a jb kernel....be careful with ics kernel,probably brick the device
Vallerino WR said:
I think you must be on a jb kernel....be careful with ics kernel,probably brick the device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's the opposite
Yes, it is, you must be on ICS kernel, that's the reason it has some bugs still, as BT one... IMHO
Enviado desde mi MOTOROLA RAZR usando Tapatalk 2
But I can ONLY install into sot_1?
Or are there a way to instal into slot_2?
Are there any problem installing in slot_1?
romdroid. said:
There is already a thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2028020
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're wrong, it's a unofficial release. The one in this topic is a Official Release from cryanogen team.
Installed using BMM in slot 2, with the "why_we_have_to_skip_devfs_setup_myth.zip" patch.
Works great! Camcorder working but still no flash with de camera.
Anárhér said:
You're wrong, it's a unofficial release. The one in this topic is a Official Release from cryanogen team.
Installed using BMM in slot 2, with the "why_we_have_to_skip_devfs_setup_myth.zip" patch.
Works great! Camcorder working but still no flash with de camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why the CM, and the AOKP are made in ICS Kernel? Why the developers don't use the JB Kernel of the leaked Verizon?? Something prevents it?
Maybe because it's not an official version (it's a leaked).
guibovo said:
Maybe is it real now?
I owuld appreciate to test it, but I don't know how, if it like AOKP or something like that.
http://get.cm/?device=umts_spyder
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Umts_spyder_Info
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's an image for download in the Nightly's session. You may download it and flash. That's all. I did it here through Safestrap 3.11 on Slot 1 and it wokred very well.
This ROM is awesome, but there still some artifacts and some other bugs known from AOKP.
But, for the whole thing, the system is sort of stable.
The official cm and aokp Roms are the same as Hashcode and Dhackers unofficial roms. The only difference is that we get updates directly from the aokp and cm teams now instead of Hashcode and Dhacker having to merge the changes from aokp and cm.
The official builds will stay on the ics kernel until the official jellybean build is released from Motorola. And probably will have to wait until Motorola releases the kernel source code.
Anárhér said:
You're wrong, it's a unofficial release. The one in this topic is a Official Release from cryanogen team.
Installed using BMM in slot 2, with the "why_we_have_to_skip_devfs_setup_myth.zip" patch.
Works great! Camcorder working but still no flash with de camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dude dont be stupid. its the same developer and the thread needs only to change the title to "official" from "unofficial" use common sense
I'm testing
I'm testing this rom since yesterday and it's very stable...
My razr has the ICS kernel, and I used Boot Manager on slot3 to test... Needed to patch devfs to boot..
The ROM is fast... but some old problems... like camera flash... the bluetooth I cant test since I dont have any BT devices...
Google now working... camera recording working... notification bar is the new 4.2.2 one
when flash camera is working it will be my default ROM...
awesome..
romdroid. said:
dude dont be stupid. its the same developer and the thread needs only to change the title to "official" from "unofficial" use common sense
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First, you need to be more polite with people you don't know. And second, despite the official build is only "cm" merged with hashcode's work it's still a new build since only now it will receive support from cyanogen team (not only about the razr port, which probably will continue to be hashcode's work, but about functionality, apps and more). But you're right, changing hashcode's thread title resolves, till he do that,it's the only thread that talk about the official release.
couillu44 said:
Maybe because it's not an official version (it's a leaked).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, but the ROM's make with the JB Kernel are very good and eliminate bugs such as camera flash and bluetooth.
>.< Is only for the JB kernel dude ? |

Cyanogenmod 10.1 DNA discussion thread

As stated in the cm 10.1 dev thread lets keep the general CM discussions here instead of cluttering the dev thread.
Great idea - now we can have all the misguided, misinformed speculation we want as to what hurdles have yet to be cleared before the DNA gets official CM nightly support
jk
Haha, exactly.
Actually, I think efforts might soon be underway to port straight AOSP as well I hope what I've heard (I can't give details, so please don't ask) comes to fruition.
That'd be great. I've been trying to learn more about programming and the build system so I can start helping out with some of it. I've setup ubuntu and sync and build cm every couple of days and I've been messing with building aokp since its based on cm.
AOKP, PA, PAC ROMs me want
Also some AOSP kernels as well
Sent from my TF300T using Tapatalk 2
I made a few changes and aokp started to build but I came across an error and haven't had time to look into it. If I get it built I'll try to learn some more about git and upload the source
skynet11 said:
Actually, I think efforts might soon be underway to port straight AOSP as well I hope what I've heard (I can't give details, so please don't ask) comes to fruition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why pure aosp as opposed to CM?
123421342 said:
Why pure aosp as opposed to CM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because a lot of popular ROMs out there are based on AOSP rather than on CM. Besides, there's always room for both right?
I'd love to try pure AOSP. I've always had HTC devices so I never got the pure Android experience.
123421342 said:
Why pure aosp as opposed to CM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because I want android and not all the stuff that comes with CM, if I want themes and mods ill do them myself
Does anyone have any resources that break down the build process?
I'm pretty excited for the 10.1 rom to become a daily driver. Once it's complete I hope to see possible other roms that are desensed... I'm sick of sense! I want some unadulterated android (or close to it)!
why would you want an aosp kernel? how are they better?
atishpatel2012 said:
why would you want an aosp kernel? how are they better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sense kernels won't work on aosp and the stock one they included in CM can't be overclocked or undervolted.
Nowak4G said:
Sense kernels won't work on aosp and the stock one they included in CM can't be overclocked or undervolted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel we are using right now is our stock kernel with cm commits. It doesn't include overclock or any other features because they could cause more bugs. Better to work all the bugs out of cm before you start doing things that could introduce more. Cplamer has already said that he has run a custom kernel with cm on his DNA so it is definitely going to happen. Just have to wait or build your own kernel unfortunately.
amathophobia said:
The kernel we are using right now is our stock kernel with cm commits. It doesn't include overclock or any other features because they could cause more bugs. Better to work all the bugs out of cm before you start doing things that could introduce more. Cplamer has already said that he has run a custom kernel with cm on his DNA so it is definitely going to happen. Just have to wait or build your own kernel unfortunately.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The other reason is because they're making so many changes to cm right now to get it working that a new kernel would have to be released for every update. I believe T1gartist has been running cm oc'd with a custom kernel as well
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
If you have the source it's not hard to add overclocking.
I'm not a dev or anything but I built AOKP
TheDanimal said:
I'm not a dev or anything but I built AOKP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can u upload the build.
I wud like to test it out.
What all features are working ? Are all" Whats Working" features CM10.1 working for it ?
Sorry for asking all these questions.
BTW, u should create a new thread in Orig. Android Dev. with AOKP build :victory:

[DEV][PORTING]Linux 3.4.x/3.10.x/3.12.x Kernel for I9300

Hey guys!
As you maybe know, we have the newest Android 4.4 but only a 3.0 Kernel. But we need the newer versions since Android is based of this new ones and if the gap between our version and Google's version is too big, it will take a long time to reach this. So i would say: "We need a newer kernel, let's go for it!" and i wanted to know if anybody is willing or if somebody is even able to port the 3.4 (or a newer version like 3.10 or 3.12) to our device to get better performance and to be safe to get all updates. If anybody is able and wants to help, please write it here or PM me. Also we should form a dev team to have the control over this project.
So if anybody is willing to, I will really appreciate it. I start this project on my own and you can join in to help and contribute your knowledge to this project. I will provide more info if needed. And yes, I know that it will be difficult but it is possible to reach the target.
Greets and best regards,
markey
If you want, have a look over here:Thread in development discussion section
Edit1: As i've seen in the poll, everybody (till now) wants the 3.4 kernel to be ported. So I have another question: Do you want me to port the 3.10 (or higher) Kernel also, after the 3.4 is running stable?
If yes, just write at the end of your post. Thanks. :good:
Edit2: I have decided to start porting the 3.1x+ Kernel based on dorimanx' sources first and then will try to port 3.4 cause 3.4 will have a better ability to be well integrated into Android till now and 3.10+ will take us one step further and keep us on track for the next Android versions which will be propably based on 3.8 or 3.10 Kernel.
If you have questions what this upgrade will (roughly) bring us, have a look at my last post in this thread.
This is great. It will be HARD, but, worth it. Just, maybe, this will see completion one day. I'll copy in kernel devs if I were you.
@DerTeufel1980
Sent from my Omni 4.4 Galaxy S3. Proud Googy Beta tester.
Great to see this! We need 3.4.x kernel!!
Regards :good:
Yes we can
tapatalked with my i9300
ROM: CyanogenMod 11
Kernel: Googy-Max2 (r3p2)
Googy to the rescue?!
Sent from my Omni 4.4 Galaxy S3. Proud Googy Beta tester.
It will be great!!!! Good luck, man:good:
Yes. Its gsear. Wait!!!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Let the fun begin
Envoyé de mon GT-I9300 en utilisant Tapatalk
This a is a great quest ... my props to the dev !
About kernel
3.4 would be amazing
3.10/12 more than we ever could ask
Thanks for u guys doing what samsung never cared to do for us
Enviado do meu GT-I9300 através de Tapatalk
googy_anas said:
Let the fun begin
Envoyé de mon GT-I9300 en utilisant Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We have lift off!
Sent from my Nexus 7 (2014) using Tapatalk. My mobile is an Omni run Galaxy S3.
Stunning idea! I just wish I already had the knowledge and the time to help, but I really hope this takes off!
edit. go for 3.10-3.12 of course, the Sky's the limit, but 3.4 is a good stopgap as it runs on similar Samsung-devices ...
Someone could try merging dorimanx smdk4210 (s2) Kernel. He has already merged most of 3.13, and our s3 kernel is also working for s2, after cm had merged some parts.
Gesendet von meinem SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 mit Tapatalk 2
DerTeufel1980 said:
Someone could try merging dorimanx smdk4210 (s2) Kernel. He has already merged most of 3.13, and our s3 kernel is also working for s2, after cm had merged some parts.
Gesendet von meinem SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 mit Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for that great info DerTeufel, I will see when I can start to merge it and work on it. So it would mean, we could directly start at 3.13. Isn't that great? I will search for his git, and then i will compare our actual kernels with a 3.0 s2 kernel and see what i have to change. Most difficult part will be to get it booting...rest shouldn't be a thing that big. Let's wait and see.
markey97 said:
Thank you for that great info DerTeufel, I will see when I can start to merge it and work on it. So it would mean, we could directly start at 3.13. Isn't that great? I will search for his git, and then i will compare our actual kernels with a 3.0 s2 kernel and see what i have to change. Most difficult part will be to get it booting...rest shouldn't be a thing that big. Let's wait and see.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great idea! Hope it goes well.
Sent from my Nexus 7 (2014) using Tapatalk. My mobile is an Omni run Galaxy S3.
Maybe stupid question, this kernel will be used only on AOSP Roms?, or may run on sammy roms?
niikko said:
Maybe stupid question, this kernel will be used only on AOSP Roms?, or may run on sammy roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No its no stupid question, just ask if you want to know anything. You're welcome and i am here to answer questions :good:
And now to your question: For now, its meant to run on AOSP ROMs and then afterwards, I will take a deeper look and see if I can get it running good on Sammy, so just wait a bit
And I think I will add features of googy-max kernel, devil-kernel, boeffla-kernel...whatever you want, just write it then when its running fine, and i will try to add it.
I also already thought about adding dual-boot, so yes, you will most likely see Sammy support in this kernel. And afterwards, I will try to make it a kexec kernel and get multiROM or sth like this running, to have e.g. Android and Ubuntu Touch on 1 single device
dat shi cray
samisax said:
dat shi cray
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you want to say with that?
Does this have any sense?
Very nice initiative. Devs in SGS Plus (i9001) also made a fully working 3.4 kernel from the scratch (CAF sources at least ) and now they can release KitKat without pains
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
sanefirst said:
Very nice initiative. Devs in SGS Plus (i9001) also made a fully working 3.4 kernel from the scratch (CAF sources at least ) and now they can release KitKat without pains
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha I know, I own this device myself and followed all developement of the 3.4 Kernel and all other work done by ADC team. :good: They used CAF sources but we will use sources from dorimanx cause we have an exynos processor.
Erik is a good dev, isn't he? Thanks to him we also got dual boot and I think we can also get further versions of Android thanks to ADC team.
Well, we will see how good I can get this working in a short time.

[Kernel][COS13.x][COS12.1][Stock COS Kernel with Hardboot/Multirom support]

Here is a kernel for stock Cyanogen OS13.x/13.0/12.1 with hardboot support (To use the stock Rom as primary Rom in Multirom)
Code:
Use my kernel only if you are sure about the risks of flashing custom Roms/Kernel to your device. I'm is not responsible for any damage caused by using one of my files.
I have attached 2 file types.
The .img files to flash it with fastboot or an kernel flasher app.
The .zip files to flash it with a custom recovery
The COS13.0 ZNH0EAS26M kernel will also work on COS13.0 ZNH0EAS2JK
The COS13.1.1 ZNH2KAS2X1 kernel will also work on COS13.1.2 ZNH2KAS3P0
Sources:
https://github.com/bauner/android_kernel_oneplus_msm8974
thank you so much :victory::victory::victory:
just flashed this on top of your fix
phone is stuck at cyanogen logo now
apparently I should have update to CM12 first now everything is fine.
900 something views and 2 comments...! very supportive pple in this forum nowadays.. cant get even a referance.
Great Kernel mod. Thanks... Confirmed working on my 1+1 64GB. Flashed multiboot and used flashify to update TWRP.. great work.. Thanks again.
NOW ME PHONE RUNNING THE PASINO AND THE SOKP.. MUSIC WHEN AND HOW I WANT IT>
comexx said:
just flashed this on top of your fix
phone is stuck at cyanogen logo now
apparently I should have update to CM12 first now everything is fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel in this thread is for cos12.1 YOG4P only!
It will not work with cos12 or cm11s
@bauner do you intend to develop this kernel any further? i like it
maxed4901 said:
@bauner do you intend to develop this kernel any further? i like it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If there will come another official cos update I will make a new version with multirom support.
Currently I will not add more features to the kernel because the stock kernel without any more features is currently working very fast and stable
bauner said:
If there will come another official cos update I will make a new version with multirom support.
Currently I will not add more features to the kernel because the stock kernel without any more features is currently working very fast and stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes it definitely is working well.. thanks though and look forward to future builds.:good:
bauner said:
If there will come another official cos update I will make a new version with multirom support.
Currently I will not add more features to the kernel because the stock kernel without any more features is currently working very fast and stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi!
YOG4PAS2QL seems to be out.
Wondering if the kernel was changed, if yes, can you please release a patched version?
Tnx!
Hello?
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Pls provide kernel for latest OTA with multirom support
Hi @Bauer. I have been alive because of your kernel. I keep stock ROM as stock multirom base ROM and install other ROMs. It started with your YOG4PAS1N0 kernel version. Now that there's an update...I would like to request you to update version please.I cannot update otherwise..If I do..I will lose my other ROMs.. I do not wish to use another kernel except stock one please.
Dusha999 said:
Hi!
YOG4PAS2QL seems to be out.
Wondering if the kernel was changed, if yes, can you please release a patched version?
Tnx!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Phate00 said:
Pls provide kernel for latest OTA with multirom support
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maxed4901 said:
Hi @Bauer. I have been alive because of your kernel. I keep stock ROM as stock multirom base ROM and install other ROMs. It started with your YOG4PAS1N0 kernel version. Now that there's an update...I would like to request you to update version please.I cannot update otherwise..If I do..I will lose my other ROMs.. I do not wish to use another kernel except stock one please.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel source seems to be the same
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_device_oneplus_bacon/commits/stable/cm-12.1-YOG4P
I will check in the next days if there are changes in the init scripts.
If there are changes I will make an updated version soon.
But for now you can use my current kernel in YOG4PAS2QL too.
I use it myself without any problems
bauner said:
The kernel source seems to be the same
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_device_oneplus_bacon/commits/stable/cm-12.1-YOG4P
I will check in the next days if there are changes in the init scripts.
If there are changes I will make an updated version soon.
But for now you can use my current kernel in YOG4PAS2QL too.
I use it myself without any problems
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for keeping the kernel alive @bauner. And thanks for confirming that but still look forward to the update.
maxed4901 said:
Thanks for keeping the kernel alive @bauner. And thanks for confirming that but still look forward to the update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have now compared the YOG4PAS1NO and YOG4PAS2QL ramdisks they are exactly the same.
So there is currently no need to make a new version
bauner said:
I have now compared the YOG4PAS1NO and YOG4PAS2QL ramdisks they are exactly the same.
So there is currently no need to make a new version
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
YOG4PAS3JL is out
It is reported to have Google search bar fix and 1NOV security update from Google.
Don't know if this patch covers kernel as well...
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Dusha999 said:
YOG4PAS3JL is out
It is reported to have Google search bar fix and 1NOV security update from Google.
Don't know if this patch covers kernel as well...
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thx for the info.
I will check it soon
Dusha999 said:
YOG4PAS3JL is out
It is reported to have Google search bar fix and 1NOV security update from Google.
Don't know if this patch covers kernel as well...
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are a few changes in the init scripts.
I have attached a new version for YOG4PAS3JL in the first post
Thanks for super duper fast update...

android p sources are out final but no ports yet?

It's been a week android pie is available...and xiaomi mi4 even got the android pie ROM today and we don't have any leak about Nexus 6p. I guess Nexus and pixel should be the first to get any leak on os because of same manufacturer. Does anyone know what's the status of development of pie of
Nexus 6p :crying:
There was a post up yesterday. @drewwalton19216801 successfully built Android pie for Nexus 6P, but wasn't able to test it because the physical port on his phone didn't connect to adb for some reason. So, he posted the builds if others wanted to try booting. There were a couple that were attempting to flash and help with the progress. The thread appears to have vanished overnight. I can't seem to find it anymore.
Jup, I tested it.
Was able to grab a logcat from adb so the kernel itself seems to boot.
But there are too many fatal errors right now.
I believe it was a pretty hacked build.
Duplicate whoops
Manudel96 said:
Jup, I tested it.
Was able to grab a logcat from adb so the kernel itself seems to boot.
But there are too many fatal errors right now.
I believe it was a pretty hacked build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know @drewwalton19216801 said he used the official source code and drivers, kernel, etc. That's probably the most pure it can get. Probably another reason he wanted to get it tested. I'm sure if he had a working phone that development would move along more quickly for him.
Last he said in his thread was that he was compiling something specific for you in regards to getting it to flash properly. I was really looking forward to that thread making progress. It's kind of mysterious that the mods just made his thread disappear as if nothing ever happened.
Devilmakerzz said:
https://cbldc.io/a8ce51c?utm_source=youtube.com&utm_medium=referral
I just got one link from youtube which says it's a rom for nexus 6p 9.0 is this true
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried just about every survey but wasn't able to get the file
Sent from my Nexus 6P using XDA-Developers Legacy app
Oh leave it then...it's fake..i guess..else xda would have posted it
Android P will be coming to Angler through custom ROMs. I can confirm this. Just please be patient.
MikeCriggs said:
Android P will be coming to Angler through custom ROMs. I can confirm this. Just please be patient.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about porting newer version of kernel (4.4.x for example) to make Angler project treble ready ?
RazGame said:
What about porting newer version of kernel (4.4.x for example) to make Angler project treble ready ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4.4 kernel will never happen on Angler.
Treble, maybe. I won't be porting it ?
OnePlus get AOSP Android Pie ports
OnePlus 2 recieve port of Pie, an it too has Snap 810
I'm currently working on porting P over and I have it compiling right now. Once I have it able to boot I will upload it. Then I'll optimize it and fix all of the underlying bugs.
Edit: Repetition.
Sapphiress said:
I'm currently working on porting P over and I have it compiling right now. Once I have it able to boot I will upload it. Then I'll optimize it and fix all of the underlying bugs.
Edit: Repetition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If u can do this, may you make it clear, like Pixel 2 ROM ? With blue color, Night Mode etc.
RazGame said:
If u can do this, may you make it clear, like Pixel 2 ROM ? With blue color, Night Mode etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's going to be released as an AOSP rom, So that the community has a baseline for Pie ROMS. Other than compatibility tweaks, and some small performance, thermal and battery tweaks, it will be completely vanilla. I'm trying to keep it as pure as possible meaning only AOSP source and Huawei binaries.
However, I already have plans on releasing a Pie based custom rom with a Pixel theme. So keep an eye out for AugmentOS in the future
Edit: This may take awhile. The non-frees don't want to compile correctly and when they do they don't boot.
Sapphiress said:
It's going to be released as an AOSP rom, So that the community has a baseline for Pie ROMS. Other than compatibility tweaks, and some small performance, thermal and battery tweaks, it will be completely vanilla. I'm trying to keep it as pure as possible meaning only AOSP source and Huawei binaries.
However, I already have plans on releasing a Pie based custom rom with a Pixel theme. So keep an eye out for AugmentOS in the future
Edit: This may take awhile. The non-frees don't want to compile correctly and when they do they don't boot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if you want or need any help, but send me a PM if you do and I'd love to offer my experience to you. It's been a while though...
Many phones getting Android pie..mi OnePlus ...man y nexus is so behind... Nexuses were the first one to get in old days.. I'm eagerly waiting for a single port... What's the status of linage os
skiman10 said:
I don't know if you want or need any help, but send me a PM if you do and I'd love to offer my experience to you. It's been a while though...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you! I'll keep that in mind. It's also been awhile for me, I haven't done this since I ported Gingerbread to an Froyo phone lol.
Sapphiress said:
Thank you! I'll keep that in mind. It's also been awhile for me, I haven't done this since I ported Gingerbread to an Froyo phone lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ayy it has been a little bit longer for you then! Welcome back to the unrelenting hostility of building AOSP for unsupported phones.
A couple friends and I have gotten a working build but IMS, RIL, camera, Bluetooth, and probably more need to be fixed. Please be patient, this is in no way an easy thing.
MikeCriggs said:
A couple friends and I have gotten a working build but IMS, RIL, camera, Bluetooth, and probably more need to be fixed. Please be patient, this is in no way an easy thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool. Ik know it can really be a b#tch without a decent (official) device tree.
Once tried to make a device tree for the Galaxy A7 Exynos. Didn't get it to work.
Keep it up!!

Categories

Resources