I have an android application where I will be required to provide support, I chose team viewer QS for this.
The problem -- user has to explicitly click on the "Allow connection" button inorder to start the remote support. Is there a way\hack with team viewer or with any other remote support applications where I can provide quick support without any user interaction.
Note-- the application is for a rooted device **
Thanks in advance !!
Can it be done? Yes. But the user has to set it up. Other then that stop and think about what you asked. No one is gonna install an app that allows another user full access to their device remotely. There is just to many security risks.
Bat cave One
Related
Hi!
In order to automatically switch to Wifi Keyboard as my current input method when plugging my phone (Atrix, Android 2.2.2) into my computer, I am looking to circumvent the security restrictions preventing that. Normally, applications are not given the permission to change input methods due to them being in control of the system, possibly with malicious intent.
Now, my phone is rooted, and root shall be your god, so this must be possible. To further complicate matters, I am trying to acieve this through Tasker (which does not know about root), as it already provides the several other tasks I want to achieve and can trigger them in any context imaginable. It is, however, able to run scripts - so if there is a way to do this by script, I'm set.
Google gave me a link to the developer.android.com reference to InputMethodManager (which I am not allowed to post here yet...), which says, among other things, the following:
The input method manager as expressed by this class is the central point of the system that manages interaction between all other parts. It is expressed as the client-side API here which exists in each application context and communicates with a global system service that manages the interaction across all processes.
An input method (IME) implements a particular interaction model allowing the user to generate text. The system binds to the current input method that is use, causing it to be created and run, and tells it when to hide and show its UI. Only one IME is running at a time.
Multiple client applications arbitrate with the input method manager for input focus and control over the state of the IME. Only one such client is ever active (working with the IME) at a time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only the system is allowed to directly access an IME's InputMethod interface, via the BIND_INPUT_METHOD permission. This is enforced in the system by not binding to an input method service that does not require this permission, so the system can guarantee no other untrusted clients are accessing the current input method outside of its control.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A client application can ask that the system let the user pick a new IME, but can not programmatically switch to one itself. This avoids malicious applications from switching the user to their own IME, which remains running when the user navigates away to another application. An IME, on the other hand, is allowed to programmatically switch the system to another IME, since it already has full control of user input.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The identification of the current IME is represented by this:
IBinder imeToken Supplies the identifying token given to an input method when it was started, which allows it to perform this operation on itself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I take from this that I either have to
a) gimme that BIND_INPUT_METHOD permission,
b) remove that whole restriction at least temporarily,
c) impersonate being the currently active IME by taking the imeToken away or
d) tell the IME that it should switch to another one.
Unfortunately, my programming experience is limited to C (on microcontrollers...), Python and PHP, and I have no greater experience with fitting my scripts into lager-scale frameworks, only in small ones for personal or limited use. So, well, I have no idea how to achieve any of these goals.
Could someone tell me if what I want to do is even possible, and if so, how? I don't need the full code, if there is much to it, but rather some directions, altough I certainly would not mind it
Thanks a bunch for any advice in advance!
V
PS: I hope it is not rude for me to ask this in here, but well, it's kinda-sorta dev stuff, and neither Google nor the Forum search turned up anything even close to an answer.
Use "Secure Settings". It will allow you to switch keyboard input using Tasker. It also lets you turn gps on and off as well as some other things.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
With the introduction of Android 4.2, we now have native multi-user support. This is a great feature for those of us who have multiple people using one device, but I'd like to go one further:
What about those of us who want to enable a 'guest' account, so anyone can use our tablets?
What I'd like to see is an app/script I could install to the root account that would:
A) Lock the guest account out of settings (including "App Info" from the recents menu)
B) Disable rebooting into recovery and bootloader for the guest account
C) Disable USB Debugging and force WiFi on for the guest account (to prevent modifying and preserve anti-theft measures)
D) Allow the root user to configure a list of apps [on the guest account] whose data will be erased each time the guest account is logged in/unlocked (like facebook, chrome, twitter, instagram, etc)
E) Allow the root user to select apps (like the Play Store, GMail, or anything else that uses Android's native Google accounts) which can be password/pin locked to avoid Android native accounts (anything that adds to "Accounts" in settings) being added to the profile, or at least the ability to remove them at each login.
I'd be willing to pay for an app/script like this, and I can't be alone...
Jay Aristide said:
With the introduction of Android 4.2, we now have native multi-user support. This is a great feature for those of us who have multiple people using one device, but I'd like to go one further:
What about those of us who want to enable a 'guest' account, so anyone can use our tablets?
What I'd like to see is an app/script I could install to the root account that would:
A) Lock the guest account out of settings (including "App Info" from the recents menu)
B) Disable rebooting into recovery and bootloader for the guest account
C) Disable USB Debugging and force WiFi on for the guest account (to prevent modifying and preserve anti-theft measures)
D) Allow the root user to configure a list of apps [on the guest account] whose data will be erased each time the guest account is logged in/unlocked (like facebook, chrome, twitter, instagram, etc)
E) Allow the root user to select apps (like the Play Store, GMail, or anything else that uses Android's native Google accounts) which can be password/pin locked to avoid Android native accounts (anything that adds to "Accounts" in settings) being added to the profile, or at least the ability to remove them at each login.
I'd be willing to pay for an app/script like this, and I can't be alone...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also thought that but i wish Google did this.
A. might be doable i will look into after core is done.(see below)
B. requires rom modification
C. may be doable but require root, turning wifi on is possible and automatically turning on if turned off is
D. I have auto enabling installed apps working, auto erase may be possible, Manuel is
E. wont be an issue cause you dont need to sign in with gapps, possible to disable but requires root
at this point i have the ability to enable any app installed on the primary user on a secondary user, all without root give me a few days to flesh out an app
aaronpoweruser said:
A. might be doable i will look into after core is done.(see below)
B. requires rom modification
C. may be doable but require root, turning wifi on is possible and automatically turning on if turned off is
D. I have auto enabling installed apps working, auto erase may be possible, Manuel is
E. wont be an issue cause you dont need to sign in with gapps, possible to disable but requires root
at this point i have the ability to enable any app installed on the primary user on a secondary user, all without root give me a few days to flesh out an app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know...
If you cooked all of this into PA, it would be a) the *only* rom in existance with a true guest account, and b) a feature that would actually bring a wider audience and realm of attention to PA...
ok, started on an app turns out it needs root, thought about it but its going to be a stand alone app for all users, might be paid tho.
aaronpoweruser said:
ok, started on an app turns out it needs root, thought about it but its going to be a stand alone app for all users, might be paid tho.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Given the level of control over apps and data it would need to create a true guest environment, I figured it would be root only. If you need an alpha/beta teater, I'll happily volunteer
Jay Aristide said:
Given the level of control over apps and data it would need to create a true guest environment, I figured it would be root only. If you need an alpha/beta teater, I'll happily volunteer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is an amazing idea, im up for alpha/beta testing as well.
Alpha/beta tester
I am looking for something like this as well, and will happily alpha/beta test it.
Being a Noob to Android I thought I'd install some location based profile software which is one of the things that Android owners always say they can do which is lacking from the iPhone.(where I come from)
Lamma seems to be recommended but the permissions it asks for include:
"Add or modify calendar events and send email to guests without owners' knowledge. read calendar events plus confidential information"
clicking on the detail is even more scary.
Android tells you what it's going to do - but do users actually allow this? Most apps seem to want permissions that you would have to be mad to accept.
Can I not install any useful app without agreeing to terms that are unacceptable?
What am i missing? Do people just allow unrestricted access? Not install any app? or is there a way of installing apps but not giving them stupid access?
I can't believe people allow that sort of access - I must be missing something.
Some custom after market ROMs allow to drop any permission by user but it may render app useless.
Most of the time apps are not malware, but sometimes they may be. You can contact developer of the app requesting for reasons of these permissions and he may reply better.
you can always use auto start manager app within the rom toolbox to control the permissions of the apps..
Confucious said:
Being a Noob to Android I thought I'd install some location based profile software which is one of the things that Android owners always say they can do which is lacking from the iPhone.(where I come from)
Lamma seems to be recommended but the permissions it asks for include:
"Add or modify calendar events and send email to guests without owners' knowledge. read calendar events plus confidential information"
clicking on the detail is even more scary.
Android tells you what it's going to do - but do users actually allow this? Most apps seem to want permissions that you would have to be mad to accept.
Can I not install any useful app without agreeing to terms that are unacceptable?
What am i missing? Do people just allow unrestricted access? Not install any app? or is there a way of installing apps but not giving them stupid access?
I can't believe people allow that sort of access - I must be missing something.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You really have to think about what the app could be using the permission for, for example something like tasker pretty much needs every permission going because it allows you to set anything up as a profile etc.
The rule of thumb is to look at the app reviews, look at the permissions and just think about what the app could be using it for.
Sure a soundboard style app shouldnt need to make phone calls but many apps do need permissions that at first glance you might not think are needed.
And if your really in doubt email the developer and ask them to explain why they need this permission.
Surprise :laugh:
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/manage-individual-app-permissions-with-xprivacy/
Hello
I'm developing a new app that enables the extra settings provided by the knox API.
You can run the app without root privileges.
Right now you can:
-View iptables rules
- Grant and revoke permissions to apps
- disable protected apps
- disable specific components of an app (activity, services, listeners, providers)
Planned features include:
- Edit firewall rules
- real user interface
- list all the changes currently enabled
If an App refuses to be disabled you can achieve the same result by disabling its main activity component
I did my best to provide a visual appealing interface
search for "it.ygopro.extendedsettings" on the google market.
Matteo
Good work.
App Works on my n910c.
Thanks.
I added the planned features on the main post.
If the app works, please share your specs (android version, launcher, knox status, phone model).
Matteo
EDIT:
Sorry.
I had to disable the app. The developer license doesn't allow so many activations. I have to wait for a developer license
As written in the title I would need a trick that prevents an Android device from requesting RSA authorization during the first use of ADB (which I use for remote connection via SCRCPY), and automatically give authorization to every devices.
I work in a company where we develop applications for companies, and for a project we used 30 Android mini-PCs that were installed in locations that are not easily accessible for maintenance, so I would need to access them remotely without requiring RSA authorization (precisely because reaching the mini PC to connect the mouse and accept the pop-up window would be really inconvenient).
If it can help the devices we use are already rooted.
Thanks in advance for the support.
Best regards,
Vasco.
if clicking a pop-up is inconvenient then so is this trick too...
https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/help/solved-adb-unauthorized-rsa-prompt-t3693961
CXZa said:
if clicking a pop-up is inconvenient then so is this trick too...
https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/help/solved-adb-unauthorized-rsa-prompt-t3693961
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks CXZa, yes also this solution would be a bit tricky.
The best solution would be a method applicable during development, something that can maybe bypass this control and allow an automatic authentication to any incoming connection and for any device.
Really I don't know if it's something possible in Android, maybe also with a third part application.