Hi guys!
I would like to share with you my app, Medical scoring system. It has 3 scoring system right now that will help you (as a Medical personnel) in the managment of patient with certain Medical conditions.
The app is free and you can download it Medical scoring system.
Feel free to Review the app and if you need other scoring system to be included in the future update, just PM me.
Related
Lets all benchmark our XDA (MDA etc) . . . .
Then lets see how we can make them quicker!
Options:
- Registry Hacks?
- Overclocking Software?
- Etc . . . .
Surely somebody here has to be thinking along the same lines as me?
After all if you use something a lot, you want it better....
Can we clock this baby to 300Mhz + . . . .
MADmanFREE
:twisted:
I'm fairly certain anything over around 225-230 would exceed the refresh time for the memory and cause a hard reset. If it is even possible to manipulate the clock in the XDA by software.
Can someone explain
There is a large community devoted to overclocking. I have to ask why.
Is it really worth compromising the stability (and possibly integrity) of the hardware just for a few extra percent of speed?
These chips were designed to run at a certain speed (with a small margin to maintain stability). These chip designers know what they're on about, why do so many people think they know better?
I have to admit, i used to overclock my 486's, and it caused me so much trouble. Also a large high street retailer I worked for at the time used to overclock PC's and sell them as a higher spec - the amount of support calls we used to get!!!
By all means, if you want to try it, do so, but I have no problem with the speed of my phone.
Interesting so far.
Will have to get a poll going.
Just to see how much installing the extra software slows these things down...
MmF
JS's ipaqclock works, but i do not recommend oveclocking....
I returned my A101 a few weeks ago because memory would get down to 50MB or so after a while, and the whole tablet would then become quite sluggish.
I liked everything else about it, though. I wonder if the new firmware manages memory more efficiently and allows free RAM to stay at 80MB+ or so, or perhaps keep apps from loading themselves for no reason.
I'm afraid it's a hardware issue (simply too little RAM to start)... but you never know. Surely the Archos people by now have had an earful of complaints about this issue...
Free RAM on my archos 101 is constantly at 30Mb and I have no problem with sluggish performance.
I never kill apps unless they misbehave badly (badly written apps).
You can not maintain a 80Mb free level unless you don't use the device.
Killing apps just to free memory is a big nono.
Android uses a method to kill background apps automatically when space is needed in RAM. So effectively it cleans up after itself.
Here is a fairly good explanation of how the system is designed.
http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2010/04/multitasking-android-way.html
and
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=android+why+you+don't+need+a+task+killer
argie said:
I returned my A101 a few weeks ago
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why return it? They are selling on eBay for more than MSRP right now. LOL I would have sold it if I was you...made a little profit in the process.
ExploreMN said:
Why return it? They are selling on eBay for more than MSRP right now. LOL I would have sold it if I was you...made a little profit in the process.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, that wont last....
Not saying it will...but for now...right now...he could have done that.
wdl1908 said:
Free RAM on my archos 101 is constantly at 30Mb and I have no problem with sluggish performance.
I never kill apps unless they misbehave badly (badly written apps).
You can not maintain a 80Mb free level unless you don't use the device.
Killing apps just to free memory is a big nono.
Android uses a method to kill background apps automatically when space is needed in RAM. So effectively it cleans up after itself.
Here is a fairly good explanation of how the system is designed.
http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2010/04/multitasking-android-way.html
and
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=android+why+you+don't+need+a+task+killer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I first got my Archos 70 IT 250GB, I was constantly killing apps! Didn't seem to do any good, but I kept killing those apps ... I almost sent my Archos 70 back too. I even got the RMA from J&R. I don't think I'll be returning this beauty any time soon .... Also have a 3-year extended warranty.
Until I learned that it isn't necessary. I quit killing apps several days ago, and my Archos is running more smoothly. Still sluggish at times, but I have 12 folders on the desktop, along with 9 shortcuts! Most of those folders have lots of apps in them. I'm guessing that is why the desktop is so sluggish.
I can have Internet radio running while doing other stuff. The radio cuts out sometimes, but isn't much of an issue.
Internet runs smoothly about 1/2 the time. I didn't get my Archos 70 for high-end usage though, mostly just for reading, and watching short videos, and listening to Internet radio and playing music when I'm out and about (riding the bus, riding my bicycle, shopping).
Really comes in handy for having my shopping list with me, listening to my favorite tunes while walking around! I also have sticky notes with daily journal reminders that I'll transfer to my MacPro. Also use the calendar for appointments and events.
Some interesting reading in those 2 links. Thanks.
so maybe this is a newbie question but I was wondering what everyone uses as a benchmark or if the modding community as a whole finds benchmarking archaic or silly. I downloaded cf-bench and passmark performance last night, any feedback on these two benchmarks, or recommendations on new ones, or even reasonable condemnation of benchmarking in general is welcome.
JohnnyKushi said:
so maybe this is a newbie question but I was wondering what everyone uses as a benchmark or if the modding community as a whole finds benchmarking archaic or silly. I downloaded cf-bench and passmark performance last night, any feedback on these two benchmarks, or recommendations on new ones, or even reasonable condemnation of benchmarking in general is welcome.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Benchmarks take the human factor out of the equation, and what we really want is a snappy response and smooth transitions (the human experience)... neither of which can be benchmarked.
I'm partial to Quadrant Standard myself.
I love the aesthetics of Quadrant more than most others but like the functionality of AnTuTu. I know the results really don't translate to everyday performance all the time with these apps but find myself using them nonetheless. Again, the cool graphics is probably why
All benchmarks are different, and none are completely indicative of real world performance
Hello,
Do you think that the SG3 warm up because CPU is over using by process ?
because i play with "Quest and sorcery" and the SG3 warm up (by using 3G for one part ), but it doesn't a heavy user of 3D.
Do you think it doesn't necessary to use all the 4th Core ?
And do you think it can be fix by an update of ICS or it must be by a better coding of applications ?
Thanks
Usually apps do not use all 4 cores. Games usually have up to 3 threads; Graphics, Player-Interaction/Map and AI.
However your phone is running more than only the game simultaneously so the 4 cores do help.
3G, depending on your network signal, creates noticeably heat.
Is it really that bad or are you just wondering?
I'm sure there is potential to reduce the CPU-usage of the systems (there are experimental patches out there) but 99% of what you are experiencing is either the app or it's requirements.
Thanks,
I just wondering.
But i found the SG3 is too much warm (up to 53°C, 2 or 3 times and medium is 20-31°C ). and i want to know if i must wait for samsung/google or the authors of apps for a solution.
OR if i'm damned, change my phone ( but i think all is normal a this point)
bye
What do benchmarks actually measure? I always make allkinds of tests to the phones i have just for fun and to compare to others i have understood that a bigger score is always better..?
Benchmark test with antutu shows for me
10372
I have a s3 16gb and using the latest stock ics..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
CPU tests i guess is based on really long loops and depends on time that loop take you get result. RAM tests I think write big file direct to memory and depend of time get you speed of RAM memory in MBps or GBps...
On Antutu I have about 14,9K-15K with Paranoid and Siayah kernel. On Quadrant i have about 5,7K
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
e-peen.
Seriously, different benchmarks measure different types of system performance by subjecting different elements of the device to different stress and performance tests. CPU calculstions, frames per second, javascript performance - they're genuinely useful in some situations, such as for devs to test out different approaches and ideas to see if one works fundamentally better than the other, and if done properly it can be useful to compare raw performance of one device to another, but they've cottoned on in the wider community because some people like to benchmark their phones and post those benchmarks proudly.
It's all a bit ridiculous, especially if - indeed - they don't know what they're benchmarking, or they're using out of date and largely useless benchmarks like quadrsnt, or they're just doing it for the bragging rights. It's relatively easy to push your phone and have it score well in assorted benchmarking tools if you really want to, it's just unlikely to be genuinely useful in that state - for example, setting the CPU governor to 'performance' had the effect of boosting it up to the highest available clock speed, and of raping your battery life. These are mobile devixes, not gaming PCs, and are designed to operate accordingly.
Personally, I ignore people's benchmark posts, because if they're posting benchmarks they're either brsgging, complaining about something absurd - "Your kernel doesn't perform as well as someone else's when in this unrealistic benchmarking scenario! It may best optimised for daily use, but now I can't hold my precious benchmarking score above everyone else's heads!" or "This new software update sucks because I don't get as high as score in Wankermark Extreme! [twenty sad faces]."
Hope that helps.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
onslaught86 said:
e-peen.
Seriously, different benchmarks measure different types of system performance by subjecting different elements of the device to different stress and performance tests. CPU calculstions, frames per second, javascript performance - they're genuinely useful in some situations, such as for devs to test out different approaches and ideas to see if one works fundamentally better than the other, and if done properly it can be useful to compare raw performance of one device to another, but they've cottoned on in the wider community because some people like to benchmark their phones and post those benchmarks proudly.
It's all a bit ridiculous, especially if - indeed - they don't know what they're benchmarking, or they're using out of date and largely useless benchmarks like quadrsnt, or they're just doing it for the bragging rights. It's relatively easy to push your phone and have it score well in assorted benchmarking tools if you really want to, it's just unlikely to be genuinely useful in that state - for example, setting the CPU governor to 'performance' had the effect of boosting it up to the highest available clock speed, and of raping your battery life. These are mobile devixes, not gaming PCs, and are designed to operate accordingly.
Personally, I ignore people's benchmark posts, because if they're posting benchmarks they're either brsgging, complaining about something absurd - "Your kernel doesn't perform as well as someone else's when in this unrealistic benchmarking scenario! It may best optimised for daily use, but now I can't hold my precious benchmarking score above everyone else's heads!" or "This new software update sucks because I don't get as high as score in Wankermark Extreme! [twenty sad faces]."
Hope that helps.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
200% agree but it wont stop the what is your quadrant score posts .
jje
it wont stop the what is your quadrant score posts .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anyone good with Photoshop? Create a graph that reads 999'999'999'999'999'999 for your phone of choice and paste it under other people's claim.
It's neither more useful nor more useless than what they do
Benchmarks can be useful for yourself to check very basic performance before and after making changes (rom, kernel etc)
Sent via TCP/IP
gsw5700 said:
Benchmarks can be useful for yourself to check very basic performance before and after making changes (rom, kernel etc)
Sent via TCP/IP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Possible but run ten benchmarks one after the other and you get different results .
But as a method of a basic test to see if firmware has brought something extra to your phone yes .
Two areas of concern for users are always one use how the phone responds scrolls etc and that's subjective .Two is battery life and none of these benchmarks actually run a standard test that could be used to give a basic battery consumption figure over say a two hour period . But even that's not a good indicator of individuals battery usage .
jje