Related
Is it true that Samsung removed USB OTG Host capability from latest firmwares?
"DSLRcontroller" requires USB host and developer is suggesting that Samsung removed the feature.
http://dslrcontroller.com/devices.php
https://market.android.com/details?id=eu.chainfire.dslrcontroller
Could anyone try or disagree?
Galaid said:
Is it true that Samsung removed USB OTG Host capability from latest firmwares?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would you doubt Chainfire?
http://www.chainfire.eu/articles/103/_SGS2_KI_Samsung_removes_USB_host_support_patches_bootloaders/
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1202082
Any official response from Samsung about WHY did they remove the feature that existed on previous 2.3 ROMS?
Is this true ???
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the way I understood it was this:
USB OTG still works (technically) for "identified devices"; those devices being flash drives (and by extensions also usb card readers which appear as flash drives), mouse and keyboard. "Unidentified Devices" ie your DSLR will not activate in the newer firmwares. If Samsung didn't specifically add the device's USB id to their "whitelist" of approved devices, it will not activate. My guess is certain unsupported devices may have been causing issues with the phone?? Not quite sure, but this is the cause of this app not working on the newer firmwares. Before now, any usb otg would work in the sense that the phone would connect and form a link with it, even if it didn't necessarily know what to do with it (be it a webcam, dslr, etc) which is again what we need for this dslr program to work.
Maybe an answer could be to locate and modify the whitelist? My guess is that might be the easiest solution (speaking as a non-developer...)
compuw22c said:
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the way I understood it was this:
USB OTG still works (technically) for "identified devices"; those devices being flash drives (and by extensions also usb card readers which appear as flash drives), mouse and keyboard. "Unidentified Devices" ie your DSLR will not activate in the newer firmwares. If Samsung didn't specifically add the device's USB id to their "whitelist" of approved devices, it will not activate. My guess is certain unsupported devices may have been causing issues with the phone?? Not quite sure, but this is the cause of this app not working on the newer firmwares. Before now, any usb otg would work in the sense that the phone would connect and form a link with it, even if it didn't necessarily know what to do with it (be it a webcam, dslr, etc) which is again what we need for this dslr program to work.
Maybe an answer could be to locate and modify the whitelist? My guess is that might be the easiest solution (speaking as a non-developer...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey,
I am not an expert on this, but I belive that your statement is just partially true.
I just encounterd the same problem, i.e. usb-devices such as mouse, usb-stick, etc are properly supported BUT my own application would not run on my SGS2 (running KI1/KI1/KI1).
The application doesn't try to establish a connection to any unsupported device whatsoever (i.e. it just queries the number of connected usb-devices). Hence there is no special requirement for this application except the presence of the USB Host API, but this application crashes just like any other application which requires USB HOST (e.g. DSLRController).
Best
Hi *,
I'm very new to forum and hardware hacking. I'm also new to android dev (I have done some WP7 development).
I want to write application about radio conditions (RSCP, EcNo) and also wanna to decode ASN.1 messages to get some 3GPP layer 3 messages (RRC). To do that, I suppose that low level access is required.
So, is there any tutorials, guides etc. on how to do that for android devices (I know about android telephony class) or WP7/WP8 devices.
I also know that that is not possible on every device due manufacture restrictions.
I'm interested in Galaxy S(2/3), Nokia Lumia, Nexus, etc (device doesn't need to have qualcom chipset, all i wanna to do that).
I also know that some of companies like ASCOM are working together with chip suppliers for that kind of applications.
So, is it possible to do on market smartphones...
Thanks in advance for answers
Cheers!
TK
It's troublesome thing.
Every modern mobile solution does split into AP (Application Processor) and BP/CP/Modem (Baseband/Call Processor), sometimes these are integrated into one SoC (QC chips) or are splitted into 2 SoCs (like Exynos AP+QC/Infineon CP), on AP there's working ARMLinux with Android platform.
Platform does communicate with RIL HAL (proprietary lib), RIL does communicate with modem through some dedicated HW interface using kernel driver, nowaday its common shared-memory topology with abit of control through UART/GPIOs before RAM-share is set up (modem bootup, assuming AP does startup first, which is case in 2xSoC topology, on QC SoCs modem does startup first and does perform bootup of AP submodules).
The problem is - BP OS is closed source. In best case (rather unlikely) low-level transmission params might being received by RIL from AP but not being passed to platform, then you probably would need to patch RIL binary to expose these values to platform. If these transmission params aren't being transmitted from CP to AP, the easiest (and the ugliest) way to do is trying to find network structures inside of modem OS and pooling them from AP (assuming you've got direct access to all of CP memory). More advanced way would be integrating additional data into BP-RIL interface (modifying both RIL and modem binaries), what then narrows down to "best case".
If you aren't familiar with ARM assembly - analysing modem binary is pretty big task, prepare for at least few weeks of intense reversing.
This is a very interesting question!
So far, AFAIK, no one here at XDA (or elsewhere) have been able to successfully extract L1 radio parameters from the modem, using any form of API or other. So anyone who would successfully be able to do this, would be an instant XDA hero! (As for L3, I don't know.)
But then again, I don't think anyone have tried hard enough either. I have tried to a limited extent in my research of the Intel XMM6260 and trying to use some of the Android internal telephony API. Others have managed by hacking the AT command line interpreter, directly in the modem image of some limited versions of the 2xSoC's (like those of Intel/Infineon) used for jailbreaking <4S iPhones. These modem images are "only" 10 MB, whereas the Qualcomm modems "images" consists of 50-60 files and have a size up to 60 MB!! Although we should be able to find the AT command Processor (ATcP) in those...
As I see it today, we only have these options how to get these parameters in the Android eco-system.
1) We believe that the modem AT command interpreter/processor have the capability to provide radio parameters to the outside world. But this direct access often seem to be crippled:
a) by denying local or external terminal (UART) serial-access.
b) by being filtered by the RIL daemons and accompanying RIL libraries
c) by being complicated due to using modified IPC (shared memory) communication, rather than regular serial devices. However, by putting the device into "download/debug" mode, sometimes these devices re-appear!
(This is what ODIN, QPST and other programs does, see (4).)
2) We know that the Android internal phone API can use the following calls to get particular modem "stuff" (including sending AT commands): RIL_OEM_HOOK_RAW and RIL_OEM_HOOK_STR
The problem is that no one seem to know how to use it, nor how it depends on the hardware...
3) We know that the Service Mode's (settings/menu) are displaying many of these parameters, so that the phone OS certainly can get have access to these. So another option is to hack and understand how this is done by the service mode menu and the underlying modem software. This is where reverse engineering would come to its right!
4) We also know that many of the OEM phone debug/repair software, like QPST and QDART (Qualcomm) and "CDMA work-shop" etc. have full access to these variables as well...
Actually, if you're on a Qualcomm based device and can put it into QXDM mode, you can have all radio data to be output to the QXDM (3.12.754) software and possibly interface API. Thus... if we can understand the handshake and protocol they use we should eventually be able to make an app that can fetch this data as well...
Thx for your answers!
It looks like I need many hours to investigate and learn! Sound like fun, hope it will be...
I hope that soon I'll post something new on this thread about question.
Thx and hear ya!
Little update: Regarding radio conditions, here is telephony API http://developer.android.com/reference/android/telephony/package-summary.html and here is Signal strength class http://developer.android.com/reference/android/telephony/SignalStrength.html!
So I have these information (at least I hope so, because I don't have device for testing and I don't have dev environment set yet).
Also, regarding WP7 Samsung devices: there is samsung app called Diagnosis, where you can access root/debug screen in Test Mode... I was looking little into that app (I have unlocked Samsung Omnia W device), and there are very interesting informations, like list of neighbour cells with CellID and signal strength and many others (Handover test, antenna/ADC, RRC state, Tx Channel, Tx Power, EcIo, RSCP, L1 (looking now it's PCH_Sleep value ??), etc)
I need that kind of information + need to find way for decode L3 messages like RRC and RLC. From L3 you can find many other information (RAB establishment, IRAT handover, all 3GPP information element for GSM/WCDMA/LTE and so on!)...
hi *,
What about Gobi platform and GOBI dev?
BR
TheKrigla said:
hi *,
What about Gobi platform and GOBI dev?
BR
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, i was just looking for GOBI, too.
But they only show 4 Devices, with the Gobi-Modem inside:
qualcomm.com/gobi/products/finder?type=Smartphones
But there are buid in a few UMTS/USB-Sticks, Mobile Hotspots, a Router and some Notebooks (SubNotebooks),
Not bad, if you can use it as an external device, like the mobile router.
So it looks like a very special solution.
Did somebody check the HTC, Motorola or Samsung SDK ?
I am also trying to get low network info, and it looks like AT commands that exist (at least on my Samsung S3) do not provide this information. So I think emulating what QXDM does is the secret sauce... but that's hard
You can probably find what you need in the "QMI" related documents from THIS post... Let us know how it goes!
E:V:A said:
You can probably find what you need in the "QMI" related documents from THIS post... Let us know how it goes!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I quite don't fully understand how QMI works. The SDK appears (C++) to run on Windows. Is it possible run QMI directly on android? Also one post said that really low level information like Signaling can only be through the diag port. Perhaps there is a way to emulate QXDM on the android and connect to it to grab this info
Chipset access
I am wondering how tools like qualpoc from SwissQual work. They seem to have access to every damn thing happening in the android phone. Do they have any special API access from Qualcomm ?
enigma99a said:
I quite don't fully understand how QMI works. The SDK appears (C++) to run on Windows. Is it possible run QMI directly on android? Also one post said that really low level information like Signaling can only be through the diag port. Perhaps there is a way to emulate QXDM on the android and connect to it to grab this info
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mknair said:
I am wondering how tools like qualpoc from SwissQual work. They seem to have access to every damn thing happening in the android phone. Do they have any special API access from Qualcomm ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks.
http://www.swissqual.com/
Probably nothing special. What is special, is that they have full access to all their documentation. If you can download their white papers and the Android app, I'll tell you how they do it!
Is it possible to connect something like a 4G dongle to the usb port to create a roaming RF scanner and get the RSCP ECIO details from that? It's a bit mental but it doesn't look like we will be able to get this detail from the phone without paying the tens of thousands for the documentation anytime soon...
I tried to connect a Sierra Wireless device which can provide this info but I cannot seem to compile the module against the kernel.
I got QMI talking just fine on android 100%. But I need layer 1 info etc as well (DIAG)... Qualcomm docs look easy enough for the packet structure but now i just need access... And I'm totally stuck. USB is one way, but isn't there to get access locally? Like through UART or some other means? I believe all communication goes to the /dev/diag device but so far I have not been able to get access
E:V:A said:
So far, AFAIK, no one here at XDA (or elsewhere) have been able to successfully extract L1 radio parameters from the modem, using any form of API or other. So anyone who would successfully be able to do this, would be an instant XDA hero! (As for L3, I don't know.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I guess I am a XDA hero then I have successfully extracted L1 radio info, etc on Android itself. DIAG is pretty powerful and not very well documented so I had to figure everything out myself, but when it works you can get just about anything possible.
enigma99a said:
Well, I guess I am a XDA hero then I have successfully extracted L1 radio info, etc on Android itself. DIAG is pretty powerful and not very well documented so I had to figure everything out myself, but when it works you can get just about anything possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any thought about sharing solution?? Not cool man...
enigma99a said:
Well, I guess I am a XDA hero then I have successfully extracted L1 radio info, etc on Android itself. DIAG is pretty powerful and not very well documented so I had to figure everything out myself, but when it works you can get just about anything possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that right? There were never any heroes who didn't prove their worth. So why don't you share it with us? (Or if you don't want to share, at least tell us why not?)
E:V:A said:
Is that right? There were never any heroes who didn't prove their worth. So why don't you share it with us? (Or if you don't want to share, at least tell us why not?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, sorry guys for the late reply. Basically I had to rewrite the diag driver to get diag info. And this project is for profit, so I can't put myself at a competitive disadvantage after spending many weeks on it But if anyone has questions, I would be happy to answer
Hi at all!! My hero, enigma99 please tell me (or who knows)!!
I'm developing a app with SDK that use the java methods of classes like SignalStrenght and Telephony. But those methods dont work very well. (they are slow, and in much smartphone dont return the Ec/Io)
Do you think if in 3g tecnhology (UMTS, HSPA) the modem part always returns all measure (RSCP and Ec/Io)??
What's the way to follow for return this values? recompiling kernel? programming with NDK?
enigma99a said:
Yeah, sorry guys for the late reply. Basically I had to rewrite the diag driver to get diag info. And this project is for profit, so I can't put myself at a competitive disadvantage after spending many weeks on it But if anyone has questions, I would be happy to answer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is this for sale yet? Curious minds would like to know.
Hullo.
Looking for a little advice from folks about sideloading apks to multiple android devices at once (like, 8 or 9 of em). Searched around the forums a bit and couldn't find anything directly relating to this issue, so I figured I'd ask. I dunno if this belongs more in App development, but its an Android specific issue so...
At present I'm using Test Flight App (I'd post the URL but I'm too much of a noob here) to manage builds and releases. Its really great for getting beta builds out to the studio team, and to various beta testers and potential partners.
However there are a few issues with it, which are particularly problematic for quick iterations etc.
1) Actually downloading the apks is a manual process per device. So if you've a small QA team (or are working solo) it takes alot of time to get the newest build onto everything.
2) Each build has to be uploaded via the Test Flight website, then distributed to users on a build by build basis. This is a difficult to automate process, so makes having any kind of continuous integration system for nightlies etc. difficult at best.
I've been looking into possibly doing something like installing a Dropbox on each device and automating CI builds to a dedicated folder, which is shared via Dropbox to everything, but its a bit of work up front to get it working and I may still have to actually manually install the things each time.
Any of you guys had any experience attempting to do something like this?
Figured I might as well come back and answer my own question incase anyone else was wondering.
Ended up using a USB hub to connect multiple devices then running a script that used ADB to get all attached devices, then passed that list one by one into the adb install function.
Still not ideal, as it requires a wired connection for each phone, but works for now.
Dansixminute said:
Figured I might as well come back and answer my own question incase anyone else was wondering.
Ended up using a USB hub to connect multiple devices then running a script that used ADB to get all attached devices, then passed that list one by one into the adb install function.
Still not ideal, as it requires a wired connection for each phone, but works for now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about Wireless ADB?
Check ADB Wireless on Play Store. (Unfortunately all phones must be rooted, because it requires ADB port to be set to 5555)
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.wave18.adbwireless
I think you are using batch file to get ADB script for all devices.
Press Thanks if helped.
Hi guys, I've been an avid reader of the xda forum, and it's great, so far it has been an awesome source of knowledge, however up until now I had found everything I needed...
Long story short, I want to be able to use the sensors in my smartphone (Rooted Moto G XT1032, 16 GB) in the open source software Processing. Could somebody please point me in the right direction?
Basically I want to:
Connect my phone to my PC via BT or WiFi
Read the value of the sensors within my phone and transmit them to my PC
Somehow read those values in Processing and create nice graphs and stuff
I know how to program Processing, I've looked into the Amarino Project, but it does require the Arduino Part, and I know how to interface Arduino and Processing (I've done some PID control and other stuff with those), but I want to skip the whole Arduino part (at least for now).
Could somebody please point me in the right direction?
Thanks in advance, cheers!
Update 17/09/2014: Currently looking into the SensoDuino project, which apparently will solve my problems in the Android Front.
I tested it following the video in the main page of the project in the part Pairing and Establishing a Serial Connection between Windows 7 and SensoDuino (sorry I still can't post links), I have been able to read the data using Tera Term
Just mind the COM ports, and that you are actually transmitting over bluetooth, you can check this in the services tab of the properties of the paired device within Windows (If anybody wonders why not Linux, which I use the most, in which I do my main work and in which this would be pretty much a native feature, I intend to use this with a Windows Only Software)
Special thanks to TheBeano!
P.S. Depending on what the rules of this forum regarding solved threads are, I'll either update or publish whatever the outcome of this project is, cheers!
Hectormd said:
Hi guys, I've been an avid reader of the xda forum, and it's great, so far it has been an awesome source of knowledge, however up until now I had found everything I needed...
Long story short, I want to be able to use the sensors in my smartphone (Rooted Moto G XT1032, 16 GB) in the open source software Processing. Could somebody please point me in the right direction?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look at SensoDuino, they have a demo of connecting to Windows 7 via Bluetooth serial. Once you have a Bluetooth serial connection you can use Processing's serial comms to read the phone sensors. You could do the same sort of thing with Amarino, that is just read from the serial port, but it might be more work to decode the binary protocol that it uses from Processing. Sensoduino sends ASCII I think.
TheBeano said:
Look at SensoDuino, they have a demo of connecting to Windows 7 via Bluetooth serial. Once you have a Bluetooth serial connection you can use Processing's serial comms to read the phone sensors. You could do the same sort of thing with Amarino, that is just read from the serial port, but it might be more work to decode the binary protocol that it uses from Processing. Sensoduino sends ASCII I think.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot, it looks exactly like the thing that could fulfil my needs.
I'll update this post or publish whatever I come up with cheers, and thanks again!
Picked up a Moto G8 Power off Ebay and I havent touched an Android since I flashed a HTC Desire with Cyanogen Mod years ago.
Product/Variant: sofair XT2041-3 64GB PVT
?BootLoader? BL:MBM-3.0-sofiar-reteu-0f8934adaf8-210928
BaseBand: M6125_43.45.03.48R Sofia_rowdsds_cust
Recovery mode shows: RPES31.Q4U-47-35-9/54bc43
oem_locked
Spent all of today going around in circles.
Google Locked = it wants a pin to verify. Ebay ad stated it was google locked house clearance and not stolen. Nothing shows up in CheckAmend.com
On an offline PC
Android Studio installed - strangely ADB nowhere to be found.
ADB installed separately.
Got Magisk apk
Got from lolinet mirrors
XT2041-3_SOFIAR_RETEU_11_RPES31.Q4U-47-35-9_subsidy-DEFAULT_regulatory-DEFAULT_CFC.xml
blankflash_sofiar_RPE31.Q4U-47-35
From Motorola
Motorola_Mobile_Drivers_64bit
Rescue_and_Smart_Assistant_v6.3.2.12_setup - This will not install and I find this error in the Windows eventlog
MDM Declared Configuration: Function (checkNewInstanceData) operation (Read isNewInstanceData) failed with (The parameter is incorrect.)
Motorola support cant help until monday, but it might be a ASLR or some other MS security thing.
TWRP is missing the Motorola G8 on their website, G7 and G9 and others exist, so this is not an option.
Followed some of those youtube videos showing how to bypass the FRP, which appear to use a variety of tricks to either disable the Google Play Service or use an app to launch another app, a bit like getting the 2nd dial tone by calling a business freephone number, and hacking their phone system to get an onward outbound dial tone in the 80's.. Showing my age!
Before I put the device online using wifi and no sim for mobile data, I could get access to the Androids settings, where I could list apps, set permissions and other things so I'd tried to disable the play store, but these tricks wouldnt work. Put it online and it appears Android has been updated so those previous tricks for getting all the apps listed and makiing changes to their permission etc is no longer there. One of them was using the emergency phone, getting to the contact detail and then choosing a pic to gain access to other apps and that also stopped working and has disappeared which is why I say I think its been updated in all but version number!
I can access a fat32 sd card in recovery mode, but the apk files I put on it dont show, just the folders Android created on blank Fat32 partitions.
USB and ADB dont detect this device so I cant use the Wireshark USB to watch what is going over the USB connection.
AFAIK Android DeveloperMode/Debugging Mode is disabled.
I havent touched an android since the HTC Desires appeared and then I ported it Cyanogen Mod, but I subsequently learnt the UK Police had access to my phone even back then!
Not taking it apart to get access to the JTAG (just yet), I bought a few broke Pixel4A to see what I could learn about them when they arrive as well.
I see in fastboot, the mention of a "console [NULL]:null" is this the fastboot.exe alongside adb.exe in android tools, or something else?
So is there any other way or suggestion to get root for this device?
I fancied looking at LineageOS, or maybe some other OS like an unofficial port of GrapheneOS. I've found the device tree info put up by someone on here which would suggest its possible to port from Android 10Q to an Android11 distro/os, but my first hurdle is my stumbling block, I cant get the USB to work and have not found any other way to get beyond this stage to poke around with the OS and phone.
So any pointers, suggestions, advice, will be much appreciated!
TIA
Edit. It looks like Android/Google/Motorola have done a good job at locking down this OS and phone.
Edit2
Saw this thread here about making sure the Motorola drivers are installed properly.
[HELP] I seem to have bricked my Moto G Power and not it's stuck on bootloader.
This is what it looks like, and if I try to boot into recovery or system it just says "no operating OS found." Windows won't recognize it when trying to connect via USB. Any way to fix this? Help would be greatly appreciated.
forum.xda-developers.com
On Win10x64 I've been into c:\windows\system32\DriverStore\FileRepository, sorted the subfolders by todays date/time and can see a number of subfolders like
motoandroid.inf_amd64_dd80f24dcfb3dc931
motoandroid2.inf_...
motodrv.inf_....
motousbnet.inf....
and when inspecting one of the .inf files in notepad I can see there appears to be a service linked to the driver, but when I check the services, there isnt any services installed.
So I'm starting to think maybe Motorola's installation software doesnt work on windows with the default windows security settings, like exploit protection running.
More investigations...
Edit4
In the Control Panel (yes its still there in Win10), Device Manager, Other Devices are a couple of entries which the latest attempt to install the Motorola USB x64 msi installer created.
These are:
Mot Composite ADB Interface
Motorola ADB Interface
In c:\Windows\system32\drivers are a couple of 0KB wdf files (Windows Driver Foundation) files:
Msft_Kernel_WinUSB_01009.Wdf
MSft_Kernel_motoandroid_01009.wdf
Msft_User_WpdFs_01_11_00.wdf
So when looking at the c:\windows\system32\DriverStore\FileRepository I think the driver that needs to be installed can be found in the subfolder:
motoandroid.inf_amd64_dd80f24dcfb3dc931
However opening the motoandroid.inf file inside I can see lines like
DriverVer=03/25/2013, 1.3.0.0
As this folder was created about 30mins+ earlier, am I correct to believe the actual motorola driver was created back in 25th March 2013 and is version 1.3?
I know its possible to edit inf files to make drivers W2k and XP drivers work on later versions of windows, but the motorola website has the version number 6.4 but is this 6.4 the version number of the installation program?
Anyway scrolling further down the motoandroid.inf I can see towards the bottom instructions to install a service
"Mot ADB Interface Installation Driver" and it needs to find the actual driver in %root%\System32\Drivers\motoandroid.sys
Various paramaters, like a transfer size 4096bytes, a debug level of 2 and plenty of guids which will be found in the registry.
Anyway uninstalling the software as now removed these subfolders from the DriverStore\FileRepository, so a reboot and another attempt to see where its failing.
I just hope it doesnt need an internet connection, as this offline pc is a dev machine.
Onwards and upwards....
Edit 5
So the Windows 10 setting which prevents the Lenevo Rescue and Smart assist from installing is the Windows App and Browser Control > Exploit Protection > Force randomisation for images (Mandatory ASLR) when its on.
You can have every other windows setting on, like ransomware protection, normal ASLR, DEP etc etc and LMSA installs fine, right now its downloading an image to flash from FastBoot, but its not got the Developer mode/USB debug enable in android to make this possible.
Now lets see if I can get the Motorola USB drivers to work with ADB...
Got to say these forums are excellent cheap intelligence gathering tools for manufacturers and software companies to harden their products.
So tried lots and lots of these types of YouTube videos which are exploiting an SE Linux "vulnerabilities/design flaw" by getting access to enough of the system in order to disable/force stop certain apps in order to get past FRP block.
Some of these are less than a month old with less than 100 views, but I also suspect some of them of doing a bit of camera editing. I guess its a way of bunking up the number of views for a youtube account, before it gets rebranded, if thats even possible!?!
Now I managed to get the Lenovo Rescue and Smart Assist program to work, once I realised it will not install when Windows Exploit protection/Mandatory ASLR is enabled (which is a give away as to what the installer is doing on my system as well), and the give away information which suggests it might be worth downloading wireshark and installing the USB "packet" sniffer is the fact that when LMSA is running and you plug your usb cable into the Motorola phone, the phone displays the battery power as a xx% inside a swirling circle of sorts.
So there is some sort of USB communication taking place?
The other thing that gives it away is when you type in your IMEI number into the LMSA Rescue section, its detecting the version of firmware and wants to download the latest version.
LMSA did this to me last night as it downloaded
SOFIAR_RETEU_RPES31.Q4U_47_35_12_subsidy_DEFAULT__regulatory_DEFAULT_CFC.XML.zip
which I guess I can search for on this computer, or at least search for files on my windows hard drive created within a certain date/time frame, as the filename might be scrambled/obfuscated in some temp folder.
So is it just Firmware level communication, or is there some sort of Android communication taking place as well?
If its just firmware, then what could be elucidated/deduced from attacking the firmware? Perhaps its time to get the Wireshark USB sniffer out after all.
As I can also put an SD card into the phone (the start of a potential side channel attack) and the phone will load the SD card, I could explore different routes like some "malware" embedded using a picture to attach to the Emergency Contact details, maybe some PHP embedded in the pictures EXIF data or something that could trigger some other secondary app/process in Android into action.
It might pay for me to lookup the Google Android source if its open source, and look at the Android project source which is open source for any vulnerabilities. Anything mentioned in Github could give away clues
Configure on-device developer options | Android Studio | Android Developers
Learn how to configure system behaviors that help you profile and debug your app performance.
developer.android.com
So are there any issues listed here which doesn't just affect Android 13, but maybe earlier versions as well?
Google Issue Tracker
issuetracker.google.com
So lots of less obvious or not publicly mentioned intelligent sources of potential attack vectors in plain sight.
Seeing if I can alter the cpu clock speed and quantum could also help to introduce some instability, Linux has a wider range of cpu schedulers than windows, but this route tends to hang systems and I have to get enough access to this phone in order to change the route.
The recovery msg logs seen when selecting different bootloader options give away info, I think this is DMesg output of sorts. I'm not a linux programmer, just a boring old windows programmer.
I could explore what else could be loaded from the SD card, using the Bootloader menu options. I was surprised the APK packages dont appear in SD card in the "Recovery Mode > Apply updates from SD card" option. Maybe its not expecting a APK file extension? Mybe its expecting a different file of sorts like a .bin file or .img file. Is this where BlankFlash comes into play?
I have to admit, buying a second hand phone like this with FRB enabled off Ebay from a guy purporting to be in Salisbury home of Noivchok, is also a great way of spreading the latest and greatest malware to unsuspecting hackers and also to phish those who could potentially get around the FRB restriction with the minimum of effort. The UK civil service have their own internal postal system so has something been posted internally down the M5 motorway from Cheltenham, for some intelligence gathering or a cheap way of outsourcing some device cracking?
Oh well the silence is deafening.
So Motorola Support Centre have been in touch and stated:
I am really sorry to say that the kill switch feature, which is known as "Google Lock" is not bypassable by anyone other than the repair center.
So they are stating the Android Factory Reset Protection (FRP) can be bypassed which is another way of saying it can be undone, so the next challenge is finding out where on the device this flag or flags resides.
Is it something like the RaspberryPi One Time Programmable (OTP) switch's that may not be One Time Programmable but like the dip switches seen on the motherboards of early 8086/286/386/etc personal computers, or something else like a file on the main storage device with the rest of android.
I think the first thing to do is get Wireshark and the USB sniffer to see what information is being sent over the USB cable.
And as its possible to get the device online via wifi, it's probably a good idea to see what information is being sent over wifi, so using wireshark on a raspberrypi masquerading as an access point might be useful as well.
So the first thing to do is have a look at the Android documents
Android
Android has 74 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub.
github.com
https://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/admin/FactoryResetProtectionPolicy
The factory reset protection policy determines which accounts can unlock a device that has gone through untrusted factory reset.
So it looks like Android are also stating the Factory Reset Protection can be undone. It seems a that a single user setup and a corporate setup exist, where a corporate account could be used to remotely wipe a device and then reenable the device, I guess if the user hands it back to the company.
https://developer.android.com/about/versions/marshmallow/android-6.0-changes API 23
EXTRA_PROVISIONING_RESET_PROTECTION_PARAMETERS is removed so NFC bump provisioning cannot programmatically unlock a factory reset protected device.
You can now use the EXTRA_PROVISIONING_ADMIN_EXTRAS_BUNDLE extra to pass data to the device owner app during NFC provisioning of the managed device.
Interestingly, NFC can be used to unlock FRP in earlier versions of Android. and its possible to use NFC to potentially configure and more other devices using NFC. As NFC is just a low power and thus low range frequency in the RFID range of frequencies alot of other things could be possible. NFC to me is just like any other form of communication method, beit a usb cable, telephone wire, wifi, ultrasonic sounds, or Infrared.
Radio-frequency identification - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
NFCIP-1 and NFCIP-2
Near-field communication - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
As NFC can communicate a request and response, and Android is using NFC to configure devices, using NFC may be a novel attack vector for peoples android devices, without them knowing about it unless they capture on a personal webcam everyone and every NFC device they come in to close contact with. Maybe using payment terminals could become a new attack vector at your favorite local retail outlet?
Well if Covid doesnt make people socially distanced, then maybe an NFC attack vector might if it works beyond the claimed 4cm operating range! Unfortunately this phone does not come with NFC, but others do.
I've got to find the source code....
Android (operating system) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Most versions of Android are proprietary. The core components are taken from the Android Open Source Project (AOSP), which is free and open-source software (FOSS) primarily licensed under the Apache License.
Search results for "factory reset protection" | Android Open Source Project
source.android.com
The default implementation of Test Harness Mode uses the same storage mechanism as Factory Reset Protection to store the ADB keys temporarily in a persistent partition.
So it looks like I need to gain access to this "persistent partition" and try to find this ADB for starters.
Seems a bit sneeky of Google and Android here. https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/2016-02-01
At the bottom of the Android webpage is a link to Factory Images of the Google Nexus and Pixel phones which jumps you to Google web page. No indication what so ever I'm leaving Android and going to Google!
Flashing devices | Android Open Source Project
source.android.com
To enable OEM unlocking on the device:
In Settings, tap About phone, then tap Build number seven times.
When you see the message You are now a developer!, tap the back button.
In Settings, tap System, then tap Developer options and enable OEM unlocking and USB debugging. (If OEM unlocking is disabled, connect to the internet so the device can check in at least once. If it remains disabled, your device might be SIM locked by your carrier and the bootloader can't be unlocked.)
Reboot into the bootloader and use fastboot to unlock it.
For newer devices (2015 and higher):
fastboot flashing unlock
For older devices (2014 and lower):
fastboot oem unlock
Tip: if you're seeing `adb devices` output before reboot but fastboot or the flash script are misbehaving, it might be issues with your USB cable. Try a different port and/or switching connectors. If you are using a USB C port on your computer try a USB A port instead.
Confirm the unlock onscreen.
Well the instructions I've seen only talk about the gaining access to settings and the doing 7 taps on the Build Number. Lets see if the rest of the instructions work.
Onwards and upwards....
Well sent the phone back the Ebay seller claiming to be a house clearance business wouldnt provide any paperwork to back up his claims of how he came to be in possession of the phone. So as I planned to do some computer forensics on it, like retrieve the files wiped by a Factory Reset, and the perverse interpretation of the law in this UK, I wasnt prepared to go any further with the phone. So its been sent back. The banks have already shown how untouchable they are, other big businesses are also in the same position and finding illegal stuff on a phone is not a risk I'm not prepared to take without paperwork.