Related
Just rambling here. In order to get ICS ported to the Venue, we need compatible kernel drivers. It appears, from what I can find on the 'net, that Qualcomm isn't releasing drivers for the QSD8250 for ICS. Looking around XDA, I see the HTC Desire (GSM), also based on the '8250, has a working ICS beta found here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1403113. This appears to use a Tiamat kernel, http://tiamat-dev.com/tiamat_bravo/. Using the AOSP 4.0.x repository, the Dell info from http://opensource.dell.com/releases/venue/v4.06/ and the Tiamat kernel, is it possible to pull together an ICS port? I wish I had more experience with this type of stuff...
Dell used the CAF 8260 GB sources when building 4xx roms, they simply backported whatever they need to from their already working 3xx codebase for whatever was needed (i assume)
CAF itself dropped support for 8x50 in their GB codebases, but the 8x60 is close enough it didnt really matter ultimately.
Much of the drivers arnt even in the kernel, they're in the android userland which is Apache and not gpl, hence the driver issue.
Which ever method you (presumedly do) to get the kernel booting under ICS doesnt really matter, but the more difficult/time-consuming methods will ultimately be more useful for porting to newer kern versions.
Don't forget the Nexus One and, IIRC, the HD2 also use the 8250
I would think this would help too: http://www.xda-developers.com/android/qualcomm-releases-adreno-2xx-gpu-binaries-for-ics/
Too bad the development work is well outside my capabilities. Maybe our Korean friends are working on it though.
Guys.!!! Dell venue n dell streak 5got same rom n environment hardware too just diffrence is venue is Hdpi n dell streak is Mdpi .so why do nt we join hands n make ics work for dell or on other hand u can take advantage of our dell streak 5 formus there r few good roms like longhorn 2.8 with Hdpi support for dell Venue and Dcs 1.1.which supports both hdpi n mdpi just need to edit build.prop n may be kernel....whish u all safe cooking ...n Friends in need friend indeed ..
Max
Sent from my Dell Streak using xda premium
Sent from my Dell Streak using xda premium
Folks, I can see that Qualcomm released Adreno 200 drivers for ICS several months ago (Mar) (https://developer.qualcomm.com/mobi...phics-optimization-adreno/tools-and-resources).
Information in the above page also says that, the drivers has been tested on CAF M8960AAAAANLYA1030. As I noticed, whenever we get the source code from Code Aurora, there is also a kernel directory included. Do you think that we can start from that kernel to port ICS to Venue?
chacona said:
Folks, I can see that Qualcomm released Adreno 200 drivers for ICS several months ago (Mar) (https://developer.qualcomm.com/mobi...phics-optimization-adreno/tools-and-resources).
Information in the above page also says that, the drivers has been tested on CAF M8960AAAAANLYA1030. As I noticed, whenever we get the source code from Code Aurora, there is also a kernel directory included. Do you think that we can start from that kernel to port ICS to Venue?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes we can,
But I aint that good into dev
This mobile has what it requires to run ICS
The kernel itself ultimately doesnt matter, as long as it has the right code changes merged in.
The current S5 ICS kernel's lineage is:
S5/405 (dell) -> Phoenix kernel/GB (n0p) -> Phoenix/cm7.2 (hPa) ?-> Phoenix/cm9 (hPa) -> Phoenix/AOSP (kibuuka)
Only the final step involved merging in any changes to make it work with ics, ultimately it's based mostly on the phoenix GB kernel which itself is based on the S5's 405 kernel
S5 405 = S5 408 = V 406 = V 408, they're all the same kernel (with ifdefs/configs for the S5/V).
I'd imagine getting a V kernel to boot ICS period is 85% of the work as the S5's froyo/GB kernels can directly boot V froyo/gb roms, and the reverse would likely hold.
The kernel 405/6/7/8 from Dell can be built successfully, however there are known issues such as after charging, we won't be able to boot the kernel up. I do not have a Streak, so I wonder whether those issues are fixed well in Phoenix kernel Manii? Can you show me how to get the source for the latest phoenix kernel that you're using with your Streak AOSP? Maybe I will try to build with Venue myself to see how things work!
phoenix kernel/ICS - Github
It's currently in the process of being merged back in.
You could try diffing S5 405 with V 406 and seeing what's changed in the source, they're nearly identical, but I dont expect them to be bit identical
TheManii said:
phoenix kernel/ICS - Github
It's currently in the process of being merged back in.
You could try diffing S5 405 with V 406 and seeing what's changed in the source, they're nearly identical, but I dont expect them to be bit identical
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds interesting, that's exactly what I did in my custom overclocked kernel. However, I will be able to save some time by using their kernel directly. In fact, I think that 405/407 kernel is not very different from 406 since my build for 405 also ran on DV too.
I will try with their "master"/experimental14 branch kernel first (to CM 7.2.0). Thanks for your information!
chacona said:
I will try with their "master"/experimental14 branch kernel first (to CM 7.2.0). Thanks for your information!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will be waste of time as only streak-specific file is board-qsd8x50_austin.c, other changes are device-independent.
Changes that essential to run ics with hwa:
kgsl3.8 - kernel-side drivers are in drivers/video/msm - direct drop in instead of one that's shipped with stock 405 kernel
include/linux/msm-kgsl.h - to make kgsl3.8 build
(not really)*streak-specific*changes to arch/arm/mach-msm/board-qsd8x50_austin.c - changes in hardware init routines needful for kgsl3.8 (updated data structures, powerrail). In short - do a diff for board-qsd8x50_austin.c between Phoenix and ics branches to find out what's changed - to be honest - changes are generic for qualcomm devices, so direct copy/paste of changes into your device's board file will do the job
Other patches that were applied to ics branch are optional (cpu governors, io schedulers, netfilter specific changes (these are only needed if you need ics' mobile data usage collecting/limits features)) or affect streak-specific drivers only (and are not ics-specific).
So, in short - update your device's board file and use ics branch - that would be enough.
kibuuka said:
So, in short - update your device's board file and use ics branch - that would be enough.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you think I can start with the stock kernel, download the ICS tree including the kernel, then do the diff/merge between device's board file from ICS kernel to Dell kernel? After that, the original Dell kernel is patched with new stuffs for ICS, and can be used with ICS ROM?
i can also provide you with all patches made for streak against aosp source tree for shortening your mileage and instructions for a quickstart (my streak is broken at the moment, so i've suspended my development activities and got spare time for that)
please mention kernel for streak's ics is being built separately at the moment (i've got plans incorporating it in aosp build process, but it will take some time)
when i've messed with streak kernel making it ics-friendly i've realised that most of stuff can be made cross-compatible between two devices.
It's 95% the kernel, the only thing left is to turn off the rotation patch and swap out the BCM4325 for BCM4239 drivers.
On stock 3/4xx i can directly load venue roms on my S5 and only wifi is broken. (with a S5 kernel) Everything else works.
TheManii said:
It's 95% the kernel, the only thing left is to turn off the rotation patch and swap out the BCM4325 for BCM4239 drivers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
rotation is triggerable through kernel configuration menu. check.
as of wifi - is there any known-to-be-trustable list of hardware components for venue?
The V is just an S5 without the hdmi and whatever provides usb hosting.
The only other notable change is the wifi chip.
All the other sensors are compatable, and so is the modem+ril.
(I was able to get 3g working, but not wifi due to the chip being different)
I dont think anyone has done a (good quality) teardown on the V though.
Most I can offer is to pull details android gives back while it's on.
I'm guessing that's how CM7.2 was ported, since hPa didnt actually own a V,
he just took his S5 build, and flicked a few switches.
(it helped a lot that CM7.2 doesnt need any kernel changes to boot, it's just the stock 408 one with a modded ramdisk)
He only had access to a V for like a day or so.
kibuuka said:
i can also provide you with all patches made for streak against aosp source tree for shortening your mileage and instructions for a quickstart (my streak is broken at the moment, so i've suspended my development activities and got spare time for that)
please mention kernel for streak's ics is being built separately at the moment (i've got plans incorporating it in aosp build process, but it will take some time)
when i've messed with streak kernel making it ics-friendly i've realised that most of stuff can be made cross-compatible between two devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Kibuuka, that sounds good, could you please share?
One more thing I would like to ask is, the stock kernels 405/407 and 406 have issues regarding power (sometime I can see the issue that after charging, screen goes black and we can only quit that situation by removing the battery). How did you address it? (I notice that your kernel works well on my CM7, without that issue - or is just simply because it has not happened yet?)
n0p did enormous amount of work addressing sleep of death issue (which, i believe is one you refer to), so dsc kernels (opposed to stock ones) are free of this bug. Ask him for details (i wasn't involved to dsc development at the point he managed to fix it) as he's best source of information on SoD issue fix you could find
As of aosp patchset - will upload it during weekends.
For whatever it's worth, as soon as we get a working ICS level kernel, I plan on porting TWRP and CWM-touch.
Those require ICS kernels (or rather it's a great deal more difficult to make them run on GB kernels) and I cant port them until then.
I've already gotten TWRP and CWM-touch working on the S7, and plan on porting TWRP to the S10 now.
Edit: come to think of it, I actually have TWRP running on a 5xx kernel (which is HC), i'll try simply porting and seeing what happens
Just trying to understand the game here... previously I had a Sprint Galaxy Nexus and as I understood it the entire source for the image was available and thus the devs could do a full build roughly equivalent to what an OEM would do. On the other hand with a device like my Galaxy Tab 10.1 there were certain things that were always flaky (running non-OEM roms) and the devs claimed they just didn't have the real drivers to properly support the hardware.
So what is the actual deal with the DNA? To run something like 4.1.2 what would be the procedure to generate the image? Nevermind the unlock/s-off details of actually getting it on the phone, how would you go about getting the DNA-specific drivers from the stock image and combining that with the aosp mainline? Would this involve disassembly of the stock image? Or is there a way to somehow use binary modules directly from the stock image?
Bump
Sent from my ViperVivow
from what I understand the hardest thing to get aosp (i believe thats what you were referring to in the OP?) will be cracking the RIL
[email protected] said:
from what I understand the hardest thing to get aosp (i believe thats what you were referring to in the OP?) will be cracking the RIL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I'm trying to figure out though, what is the actual process of doing this? I'm a Windows kernel dev, so in my world if I had one Windows machine up and running I could grab the binary .sys files and copy them into another similar OS (from Vista to Win7 perhaps) and things would just work. If I were moving between two imcompatible platforms (say from Windows to OpenBSD) then I'd have to disassemble the .sys to figure out what it actually does and then rewrite something functionally equivalent for BSD. I know nothing about Android development so I'm trying to understand how all this works here. We obviously have full stock image that includes all necessary drivers for the screen, radio, etc. And we also have generic, hardware independent aosp. So how do we combine the peanut butter and the chocolate to get the Reese's?
The issue is the RIL like has been stated. The problem is that HTC Sense uses a different telephony package than AOSP ROMs so the closed source ril.so and rild.so (radio interface layer and radio interface layer daemon object files) won't work with an AOSP ROM's telephony package (telephony.jar). There also may be some other hardware issues besides the radio like the camera that are different, but the radio is the biggest one.
Mazer
Sent from my rooted and debloated Droid DNA.
So in the past with other devices, how is this bridge crossed? Would a new telephony.jar be developed to interop with the existing ril/rild binaries? Or would the ril/rild binaries be reverse engineered and rewritten to be compatible with the existing telephony.jar?
HiBoost said:
So in the past with other devices, how is this bridge crossed? Would a new telephony.jar be developed to interop with the existing ril/rild binaries? Or would the ril/rild binaries be reverse engineered and rewritten to be compatible with the existing telephony.jar?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The telephony binaries would be decompiled and somewhat interpreted/understood and modified (usually involves a lot of guesswork and error log reading) recompiled then tested. If the build works then it is released. Usually there'll be two preliminary builds one that just has voice/text service, one with 3g, then one with 4g (all three working.) All three are completely separate and are huge milestones.
Mazer
Sent from my rooted and debloated Droid DNA.
Thanks for your responses!
HiBoost said:
Thanks for your responses!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure thing.
Sent from my rooted and debloated Droid DNA.
hey guys, just wondering how difficult it would be to do this and keep the finger print scanner. i (with no android developing experience) tried following a few tuts to try and port a 4.3 rom with little success, i managed to get it to start installing in cwm then to give a permission failure or something similar so yeah just a quick question
+1
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
hectorz321 said:
hey guys, just wondering how difficult it would be to do this and keep the finger print scanner. i (with no android developing experience) tried following a few tuts to try and port a 4.3 rom with little success, i managed to get it to start installing in cwm then to give a permission failure or something similar so yeah just a quick question
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Permission failure? Noob here too
I am guessing the ROM you tried to port checks for the Model number of the phone before flashing. What ROM did you try to port to and if you could post the instructions here we will make this the porting thread
Given that HTC One has all the custom ROM's and kernels we need devs or someone like us who can follow instructions to start doing it. I am sure we will get help from one another and end up with custom ROM's for the MAX.
I was also thinking of doing this but just to start with i don't want to look at the fingerprint scanner and may be later we could get it working.
I am certain most people would be willing to not have a working fingerprint scanner, as a trade off for a few custom roms/kernels...
Well to start you need to make sure your Meta-Inf directory is one from the Max, you should be porting from something with the same board as well which would give you less headaches in the long run. The One would be a good starting port since they use the same boards (msm8960 Snapdragon 600) The updater script in Meta-Inf needs to be pointing to the correct device. For example and this is just an example in the beginning of the updater script which is really the instructions for flashing the rom in recovery shouldn't say something like "get prop blah blah m7vzw" the m7 being the model # should be t6vzw if you were using a Verizon device etc etc.. All mount points need to be exactly what the Max's mount points are otherwise it will never flash.. The original One mount points aren't the same as the One Max. Also the kernel from the Max is a must, plus in system/lib you need the modules as well as hardware. In system/bin you need vold, vold is device specific. In system/etc you need vold.fstab again device specific stuff. The you need the hardware directory, which is touch capacitive buttons and LED's and what not. Those may be the same as the One since they are laid out the same.. The audio should most likely be the same but you would need to remove all the Beats Audio crap from system/etc since the One Max isn't a beats device.. GSM to GSM may be an easy port, CDMA to CDMA may be a little more difficult. Although they use libril-qc-qmi-1.so I think it is, that may be a typo but that's something like what the lib path will point to, the code may be slightly different in telephony for CDMA LTE devices. That would be found in framework.jar if applicable framework2.jar..
I could most likely easily get a port done, I'm just very limited to time.. Some of the tutorials out there are very generic and would kind of work well if you have 2 very identical devices with minor changes and manufactured around the same time small example would be like the HTC Desire and the HTC Thunderbolt.. That's a pretty straight forward port with some minor audio tweaks since sound image in system/etc is different and that as well are devices that would require a RIL hack as stated above with framework.jar... That right there would be strictly smali/baksmali hacking which I have some knowledge with but by no means a master of it lol... That is unless we had source for certain things but that isn't likely by no means... If anyone is interested in getting to work I'm more then willing I just sometimes have a hectic schedule... There is more to porting then just a few quick changes if you want a clean solid daily driver port... I started to port MIUI V5 just haven't really had much of a chance to test it. I have 3 MIUI ports built all slightly altered to eventually test different hacks..
The reason I chose MIUI V5 to port is because a good deal of HTC MIUI ROMs are based heavily on Sense.. Not many of them are AOSP based anymore which to me is kind of a shame.... The Chinese must have gotten tired of so many ports popping up with a lot of broken stuff because they all use to be AOSP based and to get them ported required a ton smali hacks and now when you decompile an actual source built official chinese MIUI rom and you diff out lets say services.jar from CM and services.jar from MIUI for every line of code like cdmareceiver.smali in CM in MIUI it's i.smali then cdmareceiver$1.smali in CM in MIUI it's 23.smali.... Those aren't actual lines those are just examples but they made it damn near impossible to properly diff stuff out.. You'd literally have to go through thousands and thousands upon thousands of lines to figure out which matches what and then make the changes you feel like need to be made and then hope you didn't break something in the process.... It sucks lol...
So yeah most of the HTC devices are now MIUI converted Sense based builds and I'm hoping are a little easier to port with less changes!! But I guess we'll see?!?!
Like I said, anyone wanting to work with me I will be more then glad to lend my knowledge of Android! I need someone to get me motivated again. I really miss working on Android and building stuff porting stuff whatever.. It's just fun! Plus we desperately need some form of a custom Android really really bad.... All of us do... I mean I'm Verizon, but Sprint, the International crew, all of us....
Lets pool all of our knowledge together and do some work!!! To all reading this if you are down contact me in this thread or PM me and lets get busy!
Murrda said:
Well to start you need to make sure your Meta-Inf directory is one from the Max, you should be porting from something with the same board as well which would give you less headaches in the long run. The One would be a good starting port since they use the same boards (msm8960 Snapdragon 600) The updater script in Meta-Inf needs to be pointing to the correct device. For example and this is just an example in the beginning of the updater script which is really the instructions for flashing the rom in recovery shouldn't say something like "get prop blah blah m7vzw" the m7 being the model # should be t6vzw if you were using a Verizon device etc etc.. All mount points need to be exactly what the Max's mount points are otherwise it will never flash.. The original One mount points aren't the same as the One Max. Also the kernel from the Max is a must, plus in system/lib you need the modules as well as hardware. In system/bin you need vold, vold is device specific. In system/etc you need vold.fstab again device specific stuff. The you need the hardware directory, which is touch capacitive buttons and LED's and what not. Those may be the same as the One since they are laid out the same.. The audio should most likely be the same but you would need to remove all the Beats Audio crap from system/etc since the One Max isn't a beats device.. GSM to GSM may be an easy port, CDMA to CDMA may be a little more difficult. Although they use libril-qc-qmi-1.so I think it is, that may be a typo but that's something like what the lib path will point to, the code may be slightly different in telephony for CDMA LTE devices. That would be found in framework.jar if applicable framework2.jar..
I could most likely easily get a port done, I'm just very limited to time.. Some of the tutorials out there are very generic and would kind of work well if you have 2 very identical devices with minor changes and manufactured around the same time small example would be like the HTC Desire and the HTC Thunderbolt.. That's a pretty straight forward port with some minor audio tweaks since sound image in system/etc is different and that as well are devices that would require a RIL hack as stated above with framework.jar... That right there would be strictly smali/baksmali hacking which I have some knowledge with but by no means a master of it lol... That is unless we had source for certain things but that isn't likely by no means... If anyone is interested in getting to work I'm more then willing I just sometimes have a hectic schedule... There is more to porting then just a few quick changes if you want a clean solid daily driver port... I started to port MIUI V5 just haven't really had much of a chance to test it. I have 3 MIUI ports built all slightly altered to eventually test different hacks..
The reason I chose MIUI V5 to port is because a good deal of HTC MIUI ROMs are based heavily on Sense.. Not many of them are AOSP based anymore which to me is kind of a shame.... The Chinese must have gotten tired of so many ports popping up with a lot of broken stuff because they all use to be AOSP based and to get them ported required a ton smali hacks and now when you decompile an actual source built official chinese MIUI rom and you diff out lets say services.jar from CM and services.jar from MIUI for every line of code like cdmareceiver.smali in CM in MIUI it's i.smali then cdmareceiver$1.smali in CM in MIUI it's 23.smali.... Those aren't actual lines those are just examples but they made it damn near impossible to properly diff stuff out.. You'd literally have to go through thousands and thousands upon thousands of lines to figure out which matches what and then make the changes you feel like need to be made and then hope you didn't break something in the process.... It sucks lol...
So yeah most of the HTC devices are now MIUI converted Sense based builds and I'm hoping are a little easier to port with less changes!! But I guess we'll see?!?!
Like I said, anyone wanting to work with me I will be more then glad to lend my knowledge of Android! I need someone to get me motivated again. I really miss working on Android and building stuff porting stuff whatever.. It's just fun! Plus we desperately need some form of a custom Android really really bad.... All of us do... I mean I'm Verizon, but Sprint, the International crew, all of us....
Lets pool all of our knowledge together and do some work!!! To all reading this if you are down contact me in this thread or PM me and lets get busy!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this was exciting to read, best of luck
I am going to get Ubuntu installed today and then Android Kitchen here i come!
pradeepvizz said:
I am going to get Ubuntu installed today and then Android Kitchen here i come!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can always use Cygwin on windows. there is a how to cook a rom tutorial in the General Android Dev forum.
DeadPhoenix said:
You can always use Cygwin on windows. there is a how to cook a rom tutorial in the General Android Dev forum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, i just installed it via virtual box without disturbing my system.
Just got android kitchen up and running, on prting sides of things got further this time, into aroma installes but error 7 which suggested earlyer is to do with mount points, if anyone could happen to help with theese it would be fab ))
Ok this is good start, i am proud of us here
I have got Android Kitchen running on my Ubuntu via virtual box.
I tried to set my working folder and tried tried to import my TWRP stock ROM backup. It seems like Android kitchen will require a CWM backup and TWRP does not seems to work.
With the TWRP backup i got this error
NON-YAFFS/NON-TAR FILE FORMAT DETECTED IN ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So i have just restored stock ROM on my phone, flashed CWM and now backing up my Stock ROM to COOK ANDROID
@[email protected] did you miss this thread just kidding, I know you have got a hectic schedule.
Again i am extremely happy to see ppl starting to develop ROM's!
Thanks for your encouragement @Murrda
No problem.. I'm home from work already and I'm off for the next 3 days so I'm actually going to get back to working on some ports. Anyone need a hand with anything as far as questions or setting up Linux or a dev environment please feel free to hit me up!
pradeepvizz said:
Ok this is good start, i am proud of us here
I have got Android Kitchen running on my Ubuntu via virtual box.
I tried to set my working folder and tried tried to import my TWRP stock ROM backup. It seems like Android kitchen will require a CWM backup and TWRP does not seems to work.
With the TWRP backup i got this error
So i have just restored stock ROM on my phone, flashed CWM and now backing up my Stock ROM to COOK ANDROID
@[email protected] did you miss this thread just kidding, I know you have got a hectic schedule.
Again i am extremely happy to see ppl starting to develop ROM's!
Thanks for your encouragement @Murrda
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Murrda said:
No problem.. I'm home from work already and I'm off for the next 3 days so I'm actually going to get back to working on some ports. Anyone need a hand with anything as far as questions or setting up Linux or a dev environment please feel free to hit me up!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
heyy i could use some help doing this part in android kitchen. straight from android kitchens page but i can't seem to get the recovery.fstab out anyway! im on t6ul verson of the max by the way thanks
/HIDE (sorry dont know how to get this to work (forum noob here too)
Create a file under the kitchen's /tools/edify_defs folder, with the name being the same as the value of ro.product.device (found in your device's /system/build.prop file).
If the stock ROM images for your device contain the recovery.img file, extract its files from the kitchen menu: Advanced --> Tools for boot image --> Extract from boot.img/recovery.img in any folder. Then, open up its ramdisk folder, and look for /system/etc/recovery.fstab or /etc/recovery.fstab or similar FSTAB file location. Open this file to find the mount points.
See the template file in the edify_defs folder to see how to set the mount points inside the file you created. Look at the other files in that folder for examples on how to do it.
managed to flash something and get mounting things sorted ))), getting an interesting navy green screen when booting now, will let you know on further developments. its a vanilla android rom i tried insertcoin-m7-google-edition_5.0-1 to be exact
hectorz321 said:
managed to flash something and get mounting things sorted ))), getting an interesting navy green screen when booting now, will let you know on further developments. its a vanilla android rom i tried insertcoin-m7-google-edition_5.0-1 to be exact
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good start mate! awesome!
update, getting a boot logo now which is great but im in a bootloop and have no idea where to start, iv been looking on trying to get logcat and such running but no success yet. Any advise anyone?
hectorz321 said:
update, getting a boot logo now which is great but im in a bootloop and have no idea where to start, iv been looking on trying to get logcat and such running but no success yet. Any advise anyone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which guide are you following? i just cooked a ROM today first time. I made the stock ROM for the T6UL.
---------- Post added at 08:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:34 PM ----------
ooo, Merry Christmas everyone
Yeah I've been trying to port gpe over to the max but I think I need the gpe kernel ported too.. I used the Max Sense kernel for it and I get a bootloop or frozen boot logo after install with no hope of getting a logcat. I didn't move the Max sense update-binary but don't think that would be an issue, both since Its gpe and I'm using aroma..
Sent from my HTC One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
HolyAngel said:
Yeah I've been trying to port gpe over to the max but I think I need the gpe kernel ported too.. I used the Max Sense kernel for it and I get a bootloop or frozen boot logo after install with no hope of getting a logcat. I didn't move the Max sense update-binary but don't think that would be an issue, both since Its gpe and I'm using aroma..
Sent from my HTC One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got to exactly the same point as you, reading several tutorials online i came across this interesting line "To port Sense you have to unpack the boot.img of your base rom and edit the init.rc to change the bootclasspath and match it with the port one" which is what iv done but also got stuck in a bootloop, looking at the two kernels are are a few differences in them. I think that might be they key.
hectorz321 said:
Got to exactly the same point as you, reading several tutorials online i came across this interesting line "To port Sense you have to unpack the boot.img of your base rom and edit the init.rc to change the bootclasspath and match it with the port one" which is what iv done but also got stuck in a bootloop, looking at the two kernels are are a few differences in them. I think that might be they key.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, i know for the kernel, without being able to mess with the zimage, the sense max kernel lacks the init.environ.rc from gpe, the fstab file is different(at least file extension), and there's a few things that point to sense files or folders that don't exist on gpe. Currently there is no released source for the max yet :'( so unless someone knows how to do it manually and hasn't shared HOW to do so, I just have to wait.. Hopefully it won't be too long.
Sent from my HTC One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I’ll start by admiting that, in the arts of cooking/building/porting android innards, I’m closer to being a complete noob than na intermediate user.
I own a Newman K1S, JB 4.2.2, MT6592, 2Gb/16Gb, 720p, and, sadly for me, it looks like the manufacturer (Newman Mobile, or Newsmy, who knows) pretty much disavows any knowledge of this model ever being built or sold. No reference to it, no community, no android updates or ROM releases.
Taking into account some MediaTek source codes for KitKat were made available earlier this year (even if unofficially), I was wondering:
So, question number 1 – Is it possible to build android 4.4 for my device straight from said sources? Or are they unreliable and it would be best not to attempt it?
And question number 2 – Being at the noob level, should I stay away from such a task? And, in this case, would I be better off porting a 4.4 ROM from a similar spec’ed device?
Also, while browsing needrom, I noticed that a 4.4 “official” ROM was posted for my device. However, having flashed it, I found that it produces no sounds from the external speaker (although with headphones it works fine). Same thing was experienced by other users, and there is no fix so far.
Which takes me to question number 3 – What may I try, in order to fix an issue like this? Does KK use the same sound drivers as JB, and maybe it’s only a matter of replacing them? (if so, I believe this is within my grasp, even if I must unpack the IMG files to reach the drivers)
Lastly, Newman K1S has a severe overheating problem when pushed, which I believe would be easily solved by underclocking it to 1.3 or 1.5, or maybe implementing an optimized kernel.
Final question – How do I manage to underclock with my current kernel, or, better yet, how do I port a custom, optimized kernel to my device?
Congratulations to everyone who managed to read this far, and thank you in advance for any help provided. I’ve spent the last few days reading tutorials and guides, only to become even more confused… I did manage to get android kitchen running on my Windows laptop, though!
Links to recent/updated guides that might be useful are appreciated, too.
Hi everyone,
After a few hiccups, I successfully rooted my Leagoo T5c, thanks to the excellent tutorial posted here. The phone works fine, thank you, but now, I'd like to know how to proceed to, say, upgrade the phone from its current Android version (7.0) to a more recent version.
Where to start?
Since this phone has a Spreadtrum/Unisoc SC9853i SoC (Intel-based), I suppose the custom ROMs and upgrade possibilities are few and far between, but I'd like to give it a shot.
I'm open to ideas, tips, tricks, voodoo moves and Santeria incantations, but I'm still a noob when it comes to Android, so please, be patient, and methodical... :good:
@UglyStuff
If you can unlock phone's boot-loader then you should be able to flash any Custom Recovery and/or Custom ROM that's suitable to 100% to phone's CPU-architecture. Who is the supplier of phone's SoC isn't of any interest at all.
Hi,
Thing is, as I said, I'm a noob when it comes to Android, so I don't want to brick my phone by trying to make it ingest a ROM that's not suitable for it.
If my phone came with a MediaTek or Qualcomm SoC, I wouldn't worry, because there are plenty of ROMs out there, custom or not, to play with, but this Spreadtrum/Unisoc SoC is a thing of its own.
It's based on Intel's Airmont architecture, and few phones or tablets use it, at least this specific version (SC9853i). Maybe I just don't understand too well how a ROM is built.
UglyStuff said:
Hi,
Thing is, as I said, I'm a noob when it comes to Android, so I don't want to brick my phone by trying to make it ingest a ROM that's not suitable for it.
If my phone came with a MediaTek or Qualcomm SoC, I wouldn't worry, because there are plenty of ROMs out there, custom or not, to play with, but this Spreadtrum/Unisoc SoC is a thing of its own.
It's based on Intel's Airmont architecture, and few phones or tablets use it, at least this specific version (SC9853i). Maybe I just don't understand too well how a ROM is built.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For example, I found this article where they explain how to flash LineageOS 17 (based on Android 10) on a Panasonic Eluga Ray 800 that uses the same SoC as my Leagoo T5c.
The thing is, I don't know if this is transposable to my device, though the two share the same SoC. As I said earlier, I don't want to permanently brick my phone...
@UglyStuff
The mentioned Intel Airmount SoC's instruction set architecture is x86_64 , the also mentioned Intel Spreadtrum SC9853i SoC's instruction set architecture is x86_64, too. Hence in order to upgrade yor phone's Android you need a Custom ROM compiled for x86_64 architecture. GIYF ...
OK, but since this Panasonic and my Leagoo share the same SoC, they also share the same x64 instruction set, so do I get it right if I say that the custom ROM built for the Panasonic would fit on my Leagoo, or am I missing something?
In theory it should.
OK, I guess I'll have to chance it, and use recovery in case things so south. My phone isn't compatible with Treble, according to this app. Does it mean anything in terms of installing one of the generic system images found here or not?